THE ADVANTAGE AND THE DISADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM IN ASIA By : Romi Novriadi (Indonesia) Floriefe M G, (Philipines) Priyanka Biswas (Bangladesh) Eamy N Yaacob (Malaysia)
Dec 20, 2014
THE ADVANTAGE AND THE DISADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM IN ASIA
By : Romi Novriadi (Indonesia) Floriefe M G, (Philipines)
Priyanka Biswas (Bangladesh)Eamy N Yaacob (Malaysia)
BACKGROUND
Integrated fish farming systems refer to the production, integrated management and
comprehensive use of aquaculture, agriculture and livestock, with an emphasis on aquaculture. China
has a long and rich history of integrated fish farming. Written records from the first and second
centuries B.C. documented the integration of aquatic plant cultivation and fish farming.
THE PRINCIPLE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
The waste products of one biological system serve as nutrients for a second biological system.
The integration of fish and plants results in a polyculture that increases diversity and yields multiple products.
Water is re-used through biological filtration and recirculation.
Local food production provides access to healthy foods and enhances the local economy.
BASIC MODEL OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
a) Agri-based fish farming b) Live-stock fish farming The fish-cum live-stock farming is
realised as innovation for recycling of organic wastes as well as production of high protein content feed at low cost.
MODELS OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
A multilevel integrated fish farming web of chicken-pig-fish (Source : FAO)
MODELS OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
A web of integrated fish farming of cow-earthworm-duck-fish (FAO)
Parallel Connected Web of Multitrades
Integrated fish farming network in Xiang Yang Aquaculture Farm, Wuxi (Sorce : FAO)
THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
1. Efficient waste utilisation from different culture practice for fish production (artificial balance)
The re-cycling of organic wastes for fish culture servesthe dual purpose of cleaning the environment (by
avoiding the problem of waste disposal).This is important to sustainable aquaculture
THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
2. It reduces the additional cost for supplementary feeding as well as fertilisation
Manure loading in integrated fish farming basically comes from poultry and other farm animals, which contain considerable
quantities of nutrients for fish production. Protein content from manure ranges between 10 – 30%, energy between 110 - 1400 kcal
per kg manure with synthesized soluble vitamins in high concentration (Praff, 1975; Tuleun, 1992). It also contains non digested feed. It can be utilized to replace reasonable parts of
feed stuff used in conventional fish production cost
3. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies as a necessary complement to fish farming practice.
A study survey in Mekong Delta, Vietnam showed – IPM rice-fish have higest net income (19 500 000 VND/year/ha) due to comparatively low costs and high yields
of both rice and fish.
The production costs are lower but the rice yield is similar to that of non-IPM rice farm. Non-IPM rice-fish farmers have the lowest
net income (15 800 000 VND per year ha−1) due to their high costs and low yields (Berg, 2002)
THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
3. It reduces the input and increases output and economic efficiency
The economic benefit of integrated fish farming cannot be over-emphasized since the integration is varied and diversified in nature. It is one of the most
viable, reliable and profitable of any farming enterprise
THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM4. Has potential to
increase the production and socio-economic status of weaker section of our society
It contributes immensely to the economic empowerment of many families especially in
the rural communities. It enables the farmer to be
productive all the year round and fully maximize its
production
THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATED FISH FARM
4. Meet the Milennium Development Goals (MDG’s) Objective
Ensure the food security and the Food availability
THE DISADVANTAGE
Consider this
The spread of diseaseTo the fish
To the Human
THE DISADVANTAGE
To the fish
Environment measurement at Chicken-fish farm
Spread of Fish Diseasefish become more susceptible to- diseases both parasites, bacteria, and viruses that are transmitted from livestock manure or from food remains with a poor quality,
Degradation of Water qualityWater as a live place for fish, become worse, as a result of excessive nutrient input and low of dissolved oxygen
Pesticide
P
Disease
Chemica
lPoor water quality
N
Death fish at Agri-based fish farm
Rice-fish farming in Northern Malaysia, concurrent increase use of pesticides and herbicides – affected fish species. Double cropping of rice - shorter growing season for fish.
Pesticide – necessary for high yield, but adverse effect on health and environment.
THE DISADVANTAGE
To the HumanRemember about H5N1
?
Chicken farm at Catfish
Chicken got H5N1 virus
Given to Catfish
Now, suppose chickens had died of H5N1. Surely this way, would get H5N1 into the fish guts (how long might it remain?), as well as onto skin, and into water? And how about us
as consumer?
THE DISADVANTAGE
fish production will be very dependent on the production of other livestock (especially to the food)
disrupt the growth rate of fish – fish/duck > fish/goat (Geeta, 1988).
Stress fishReduce the immunity
Where is my food?
SOLUTIONSocio-cultural factor – together with economic and technical feasibility studies on integrated farming.
Budget analysis, estimate cost of production and profit of operation.
Finance well-planned development projects to promote integrated fish farming.
Use of formulated bio-fertilizer and microagent for water manipulation
SOLUTIONTraining on integrated aquaculture-agriculture by bilateral oranization - World Fish Center
Showed significant positive impact on farmers' technical efficiency, total factor productivity and net incomes (Murshed-E-Jahan and Pemsl, 2011).
References
Murshed-E-Jahan, K. & Pemsl, D.E., 2011. The impact of integrated aquaculture-agriculture on small-scale farm sustainability and farmers' livelihoods: Experience from Bangladesh. J. Agri. Syst. 104 (5); 392-402.
Berg, H., 2002. Rice monoculture and integrated rice-fish farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam—economic and ecological consideration. Ecological Economics, 41; 95-107.
DANK U