© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. New Technology Controls High Temperature Coker Heater Fouling AIChE Chicago Symposium 2007 September 25, 2007 Presented by: Bruce Wright © 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Oct 27, 2014
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
New Technology Controls High Temperature Coker
Heater Fouling
AIChE Chicago Symposium 2007September 25, 2007
Presented by:Bruce Wright
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Discussion Topics
1. Coker economics and impact of fouling on DCU and refinery operations
2. Coker heater fouling mechanisms3. Stages of fouling4. Design of custom MILESTONETM additive
programs 5. Coking Stability Index (CSI)6. Case histories7. Summary
MILESTONE is a trademark of Baker Hughes Incorporated
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Delayed Coker Economics• Coker Economic “Drivers”
– Primary driver is the differential value of light distillates (gasoline, kerosene, diesel) versus heavy fuel oils
Product Prices: 1998-2005
01020304050607080
Avg1998
Avg1999
Avg2000
Avg2001
Avg2002
Avg2003
A vg2004
Avg2005
$/B
bl
Reg Gaso HS Dist Resid Fuel
US Gulf Coast (Hart’s Downstream Energy Services)
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Delayed Coker EconomicsGlobal market conditions have caused a great
increase in coker margins since 2003:C a lc u la te d C o k in g M a r g in
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5
$/B
bl
Cokers are making a lot of money, and refiners want new ways to increase unit throughput!
US Gulf Coast (Hart’s Downstream Energy Services)
Economic Impacts of Coker Heater Fouling
Throughput Losses
Conversion Losses
Increased Fuel Usage
De-coking Costs
Reduced Flexibility
E, H & S Concerns
2-5% ~ $5 MM
$25 – 50 M/coil
Can be > $5 MM
1% ~ $3 MM
2% > $200,000
(All Values Based on Typical 40,000 B/D Unit)
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Coker Heater Design & Operation• Operating Parameters Affecting Coking RatesØFluid velocity
ØContinuous throughput
Continuous Flow and Adequate Velocities are Critical to Good Operations!
Coker Heater Design & Operation• Operating Parameters Affecting Coking RateØHeater Outlet Temperatures
ØUneven Heat Distribution - “Hot Spots”
ØPoor Flow Distribution
732
704
677
510
593
621
649
538
568
°C
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Feed Factors Impacting Fouling
• Asphaltene content and stability Ø Higher asphaltene content leads to more
coke generation in the coilsØ Low stability feeds result in increased
fouling
• Content of solids/inorganics Ø Corrosion by-productsØ Filterable solids and saltsØ Sodium concentration
Sources of Inorganic Materials• Iron sulfide, rust (corrosion by-products)ØCrude oil storage and transmissionØUpstream process units
• Salts: sodium, calcium, and magnesium chlorides ØFrom crude oil producing formationØBrine contamination from transportation
• CausticØNaOH injections into desalted crude
• Clay, dirt, sand, catalyst finesØFrom producing formation or bitumen depositØFrom upstream process units
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Resins
Asphaltene Core
Asphaltene Micelle In Solution
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Asphaltene Destabilization• Asphaltenes readily destabilize when subjected to
stressØ Changes in pressure, temperature, pH and solution
environment can cause destabilization
Ø Can occur when oils are blended and processed
• Disruption of asphaltene – resin interaction
• Thermal cracking conditions (>750°F) cause progressive loss of asphaltene solubility in the bulk oil phase
• Asphaltenes lose paraffinic side-chains and naphthenic portions are de-hydrogenated to aromatic rings
Thermal Decomposition of Oil• Concentration of paraffin compounds increases• Resins are lost from conversion to asphaltenes • Naphthenes become aromatic• Aromatics condense to form asphaltenes – lose
solubility in bulk oil
+Heat
HSolubility Loss,
Precipitation, De-hydrogenation, Coke Formation
HeatN-
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Coke Formation• High temperature destabilizes asphaltenes -
They become more aromatic and less soluble in the bulk liquid
• Destabilized asphaltenes aggregate to become particle-like
• The agglomerated phase precipitates, adheres to the hot tube surfaces and de-hydrogenates to form coke
• At the unit start-up cleaned coils have a catalytic effect on asphaltene deposition
Asphaltene Precipitation
Asphaltene Destabilization
Hot Tube Surface
Deposition
Degradation
Aggregation
Stress & Disruption
of Resins
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Stages of Fouling
• Initial layer formed on tube surfaceØMetal catalyzed cokingØFast - at the startup of the unit when coils
are clean and metal is exposed
• Secondary layer of depositionØDecreased asphaltene solubility in bulk oilØThermal breakdown of asphaltenesØPrecipitation of thermally converted
asphaltenes or coke ØSlower
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Catalysis of Coke Formation• Initial rapid coking due to
tube surface metals– Cu >> Ni ~ Cr > Fe, but…– Many Fe sites available– The activation energy
needed to crack and de-hydrogenate is decreased
• Continued catalytic effects from metals cracked out of resid – Contributes to steady
state coking of the furnace tubes
Stages of Fouling
InitialInitial T imeTime Shutdow nShutdow n
InitialInitialFoulingFouling
S teady State FoulingS teady State Fouling B u lk FoulingBulk Fouling
Hea
t Tra
nsfe
rH
eat T
rans
fer
Coe
ffic
ient
C
oeff
icie
nt ““
UU””
Pres
sure
Dro
pPr
essu
re D
rop
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Stages of Fouling – Heater Tubes
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Days on Line
Skin
Tem
pera
ture
(F)
Slope for first 30 days is 3.9 degrees F / day
Slope for day 31 until end is 1.3 degrees F / day
With Successful Treatment
Delayed Coker Heater Skin Temperatures
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Fouling Control Additives
Program Success
RequirementsDisperse
Inorganic & Organic Particles
Polar functionality to adsorb on active metal
sites
Withstand High
Temperatures
Stabilize Asphaltenes
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Research Program Design
• Feedstock characterization test protocols
• Deposit characterizations
• Property ratios, correlations with fouling tendency
• Development of the Coking Stability Index
• Benchmark fluid characteristics with others in data base
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Coking Stability Index (CSI)
• Predictive tool for determining fouling potential and rate of fouling
• Uses an NIR laser to detect the onset of asphaltene precipitation
• Titration technique with non-solvent• Used in conjunction with oil
characterizations to determine stability of coker feed
• Chemical additive screening
2.940.458192.09.0 MonthsWest Coast
3.850.325137.15.0 monthsMidwest
2.630.34899.52.4 MonthsCanadian
Saturate/AromaticRatio
Asphaltene/ResinRatio
CSIFurnaceRun Length
Coker Feed
CSI Coker Stability IndexFurnace Feed Stability
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
CSI
INT
EN
SIT
Y
West Coast RefinerMidwest Refiner Furnace FeedCanadian Refiner Furnace Feed
More Stable
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
MILESTONE Heater Fouling Control
Advanced Process Heater Fouling Control Technology
• A new fouling control program developed for high
severity thermal conversion unit heaters
• Involves proprietary testing to understand the fouling mechanisms, and chemical program effectiveness
• Novel, multi-component fouling control solutions– Custom designed based on feedstock characterizations and
comprehensive root cause investigations
– Specialized feedstock characterization methodologies
– Utilizes new high temperature chemistries
MILESTONE Additive Technology Multi-Component Program
• Interacts with metal surfaces to reduce catalytic effects on surface coking reactions
• Stabilizes asphaltenic compounds in the feedstock to inhibit their precipitation
• Disperses organic & inorganic particles
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
JIP – Joint Industry Project, Using Department of Energy (DOE) Pilot Delayed Coking Unit
at the University of Tulsa, OKØ Investment by major refiners to study coker
operating variables, including coker heater fouling
Ø Pilot unit studies confirmed suspected heater fouling mechanisms
Ø Pilot unit tests also confirmed efficacy of Baker Petrolite fouling control technology
MILESTONE Technology:Pilot Scale Demonstrations
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Case History Summary
RefineryReduction in Fouling Rate
Throughput Improvement
Return on Program
A 9X 5% >6:1
B 3X Returned to Normal
>3:1
C 20% >10:1
MILESTONE Program Performance
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Summary• Delayed coker furnace fouling is a
complex phenomenon involving heavy hydrocarbon compounds and inorganic materials
• Two stages of fouling: initial catalytic stage and thermal or steady-state stage
• Costs of delayed coker furnace fouling can be significant especially when throughput is restricted either during operation or during de-coking cycles
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Summary• The Baker Petrolite research group has
developed a successful mitigation program for delayed coker furnace fouling
• A new, multi-component program is utilized to combat the various mechanisms of heater fouling
• Treatment programs have been used in several applications with significant economic benefits
© 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Thank You for Your Attention!