BAE SYSTEMS Developing Coalition Interoperability Marcus Krackowizer - September 2004 BAE SYSTEMS Developing Coalition Interoperability Marcus Krackowizer - September 2004
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
BAE SYSTEMSDeveloping Coalition Interoperability
Marcus Krackowizer - September 2004
BAE SYSTEMSDeveloping Coalition Interoperability
Marcus Krackowizer - September 2004
Today’s ObjectivesToday’s Objectives
• Introduce the problem context and interdependencies.
• Discuss BAE SYSTEMS’ Position
• Review example of enabling technologies and Operational analysis.
• Expand on Multi National Experiment 3
• Introduce the problem context and interdependencies.
• Discuss BAE SYSTEMS’ Position
• Review example of enabling technologies and Operational analysis.
• Expand on Multi National Experiment 3
Focusing on Coalition Combat Effectiveness and
Capability
Today’s Discussion ContextToday’s Discussion Context
NATO CNAD R&T priorities;Common Operating Picture
Joint Expeditionary WarfareNetwork Centric RSTA Time Critical
TargetingKnowledge, Maneuver & Precision Engagement Continuous Pressure
Interoperable Tactical CommunicationsInterfaces Between NATO and National
Intelligence SystemsIntegrated Agency Actions
Aerospace Ground SurveillanceSituation Knowledge Based Operations
Infantry Personal Protection & Network Centric Battle Dress
Interoperable Joint Combat Identification System
Today’s Discussion ContextToday’s Discussion ContextJoint Expeditionary Warfare:
Rapid Global Mobility Interoperability Shared Battlespace Awareness
Self-Synchronized & Integrated Military Forces:Air & Space Superiority Network Centric Operations Open Systems Architectures
Knowledge, Maneuver & Precision Engagement:Precision EngagementInformation Superiority
Continuous Pressure: Agile Combat SupportTime Sensitive TargetingDynamic Engagement Control
•Integrated Agency Actions•Situation Knowledge Based Operations•Primarily Non-Linear
External DriversExternal Drivers
• Fiscal Pressure• Multinational Co-operation• Manpower Challenges• Political & Social Responsibility
• Fiscal Pressure• Multinational Co-operation• Manpower Challenges• Political & Social Responsibility
LEGACY
Delivering TransformationDelivering Transformation
Deliver Platforms
Develop Transformational Technologies & Capabilities
Support Current Operations
Understand Customer Operational Concepts & Strategic Objectives
LEGACY
Developmental
Begin to deliver Transformation
Examples such as• AJCN• JTRS
Examples such as•NITEWorks•Network Sensing
BAE SYSTEMS plcA Platform Prime and PartnerBAE SYSTEMS plcBAE SYSTEMS plcA Platform Prime and PartnerA Platform Prime and Partner
Air
Sea
Land
World Leading Platform Integration & Customer
Support
Missiles
90,000 Employees£46B Order Book
£12.6B Annual Sales£980m PBIT
£860m Net Debt
Supporting Current Network Centric WarfareSupporting Current Network Centric Warfare
Compass Call System• Prime contractor for
prime mission equipment
Enterprise-wide Intelligence System
Low Cost Precision Weapons
• 100% direct hit operational testing by US Army
Link 16
• More than 1,000 systems delivered to US forces and 8 NATO nations
BAE Systems supported all the Flex Targeting (dynamic retasking) during OIF conducted through digital data links
BAE Systems supported all the Flex Targeting (dynamic retasking) during OIF conducted through digital data links
Delivering TransformationDelivering Transformation
Deliver Platforms
Develop Transformational Technologies & Capabilities
Support Current Operations
Understand Customer Operational Concepts & Strategic Objectives
LEGACY
Developmental
Begin to deliver Transformation
Examples such as• AJCN• JTRS
Examples such as•NITEWorks•Network Sensing
BLOSBLOS
SATCOMSATCOM
SIGINTSIGINTEW/IOEW/IO
EW/IOEW/IO
AJCNAJCN
AJCNAJCN
AJCNAJCN
AJCN Overview
AJCN is a JTRS Compliant Programmable RF System that Simultaneously Supports Multiple Missions (Communications, SIGINT, EW and IO)
AJCN is a JTRS Compliant Programmable RF System that Simultaneously Supports Multiple Missions (Communications, SIGINT, EW and IO)
Key AJCN Features:• Multi-Mission Support• Scaleable Architecture
(Platform Independent)• SW Reprogrammable• Open System Design
Key AJCN Features:• Multi-Mission Support• Scaleable Architecture
(Platform Independent)• SW Reprogrammable• Open System Design
Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited
AJCNAJCN
BAE SYSTEMSBAE SYSTEMSBAE SYSTEMS
BAE SYSTEMS plcMike Turner
CEO
Special Security Agreement
BAE SYSTEMSNorth AmericaMark Ronald
CEO
26,000 employees$5.1B annual salesTop 10 DoD Supplier
90,000 Employees£12.6B Annual Sales
S IG IN TE WIO
S IG IN TE WIO
A J C NA J C N
D T S PD T S P
S IG IN TS IG IN T
N C C TN C C T
S M A R T T A N K E RS M A R T T A N K E R
G L O B A L IN F O R M A T IO N G R IDG L O B A L IN F O R M A T IO N G R ID
F C SF C S
F C SF C S
F C SF C S
A J C NA J C N
A J C NA J C NW IN -TC 4 IS R
In fo s p h e r e s
W IN -TC 4 IS R
In fo s p h e r e s
W IN -TW IN -T
J T R SW a v e fo r m s
J T R SW a v e fo r m s
A J C NA J C N
A J C NA J C N
S IG IN TS IG IN T
R e a c h B a c kR e a c h B a c k
W O L F P A C K W O L F P A C K
MMA MMA
AJCNAJCN
AJCNAJCN
MC2A MC2A
AJCNAJCN
BAMS BAMS
AJCN is a Critical Element for Network Centric Warfare, including the Airborne COMMS Node for MMP, FCS, WIN-T, and potentially for MC2C, BAMS, & MMA
AJCN is a Network Centric Warfare EnablerAJCN is a Network Centric AJCN is a Network Centric Warfare EnablerWarfare Enabler
Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited
Delivering TransformationDelivering Transformation
Deliver Platforms
Develop Transformational Technologies & Capabilities
Support Current Operations
Understand Customer Operational Concepts & Strategic Objectives
LEGACY
Developmental
Begin to deliver Transformation
Examples such as• AJCN• JTRS
Examples such as•NITEWorks•Network Sensing
NITEWorksNITEWorks
Network Integration Test and Experimentation Works
Network Integration Test and Experimentation Works
• 10 partner companies and 33 associates• MoD directed and industry managed• ‘Solution Concept Teams’ responding to customer
questions• An integrated MoD/Industry environment
• 10 partner companies and 33 associates• MoD directed and industry managed• ‘Solution Concept Teams’ responding to customer
questions• An integrated MoD/Industry environment
A MoD/Industry partnership providing an experimental environment which allows our customer community to assess
the benefits of NEC and the options for its effective and timely delivery
Modus OperandiModus Operandi
• Verified capability options in response to customer-initiated questions – experimental resources (human, technical, analytical)– contextual information (battlespace & business
understanding)
• Iterative Problem/Question response cycle • Report key decision-points to the Customer
– Low riger visulisation and experimentation– cases for detailed experimentation (where merited) are
developed
• Verified capability options in response to customer-initiated questions – experimental resources (human, technical, analytical)– contextual information (battlespace & business
understanding)
• Iterative Problem/Question response cycle • Report key decision-points to the Customer
– Low riger visulisation and experimentation– cases for detailed experimentation (where merited) are
developed
Focus on modification of current procedures with existing assets to enhance NEC vision
Focus on modification of current procedures with existing assets to enhance NEC vision
Example of Current ThemesExample of Current Themes
• Multi National Experiment 3 – coalition synthetic experimentation aimed at improving
UK/US/NATO interoperability• Kill Chain Development (KCD)• Indirect Fires Integration (IFI)• Command and Battlespace Management (land)• ISTAR (Collection and Exploitation
Coordination)• Others include; Land Tactical Picture 2005, Under
Water Autonomous Vehicles, Combat ID
• Multi National Experiment 3 – coalition synthetic experimentation aimed at improving
UK/US/NATO interoperability• Kill Chain Development (KCD)• Indirect Fires Integration (IFI)• Command and Battlespace Management (land)• ISTAR (Collection and Exploitation
Coordination)• Others include; Land Tactical Picture 2005, Under
Water Autonomous Vehicles, Combat ID
Multi National Experiment 3Multi National Experiment 3
• Assessed and developed an operational level EBP concept– current Afghanistan scenario– examined the process, organisation and
technology required to support EBP
• Six Multi Interoperability Council nations – Australia, Canada, France, Germany, UK & US
plus NATO– ran from 2-20 February 2004. – UK participation was led by D CBM/J6
• Assessed and developed an operational level EBP concept– current Afghanistan scenario– examined the process, organisation and
technology required to support EBP
• Six Multi Interoperability Council nations – Australia, Canada, France, Germany, UK & US
plus NATO– ran from 2-20 February 2004. – UK participation was led by D CBM/J6
MNE3 ObjectivesMNE3 Objectives
Effects Based Planning is the core concept under consideration in this theme•Coalition Objectives
– processes to support coalition EBP – organisations to support coalition EBP– technology requirements to support coalition EBP
•UK Objectives– Influence development of international EBP process – Assist in the management of EBP to UK military
doctrine– 21 UK experimental questions
Effects Based Planning is the core concept under consideration in this theme•Coalition Objectives
– processes to support coalition EBP – organisations to support coalition EBP– technology requirements to support coalition EBP
•UK Objectives– Influence development of international EBP process – Assist in the management of EBP to UK military
doctrine– 21 UK experimental questions
MNE3 MethodMNE3 Method
• Quasi-Experiment• Afghanistan Vignette• Global Coalition Federated Battle Lab
(CFBL) Network
• Quasi-Experiment• Afghanistan Vignette• Global Coalition Federated Battle Lab
(CFBL) Network
MNE3 OutcomeMNE3 Outcome
• Good learning opportunity and environment to exchange ideas
• Differences between US and coalition partners’ experimentation approach
• EBP offers potential for improved coalition and UK military operations. – analysis suggests, if poorly implemented it
will detract from current operations planning capabilities.
• Good learning opportunity and environment to exchange ideas
• Differences between US and coalition partners’ experimentation approach
• EBP offers potential for improved coalition and UK military operations. – analysis suggests, if poorly implemented it
will detract from current operations planning capabilities.
ConclusionsConclusions
• Many factors driving transformation. – US will steer coalition transformation
• Nation’s need to be independent presents a challenge
• NITEworks – True solutions to the customer– addressing complex, multi stakeholder
environments that drive a NEC
• UK needs to address national NEC as a priority to solving coalition interoperability.
• Many factors driving transformation. – US will steer coalition transformation
• Nation’s need to be independent presents a challenge
• NITEworks – True solutions to the customer– addressing complex, multi stakeholder
environments that drive a NEC
• UK needs to address national NEC as a priority to solving coalition interoperability.
Questions
Command&
Control
Battle SpaceAwareness
TargetIdentification
Platforms as Nodes
e.g.E-2C HawkeyeAWACSF-18 HornetLCSJSF
Less Tangibles
Training -Stre
ss
-Workload
-Fatigue
Doctrine &
Process
Human Factors
CombatIdentification
Integrating Systems
e.g.FORCENetLandWarNetConstellationNetFCSWIN-T, GiG
Combat IDCombat ID
•One Corollary of MNE3
Related Documents
