8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
1/28
BABYLONIAN
DIVINATORY
TEXTS
CHIEFLY
IN
THE
SCHO
/
YEN
COLLECTION
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
2/28
The publication of
C
ORNELL
U
NIVERSITY
S
TUDIES
IN
A
SSYRIOLOGY
AND
S
UMEROLOGY
Volume 18
was made possible thanks to a generous subvention from an anonymous donor
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
3/28
Cornell University Studies in
Assyriology and Sumerology
(CUSAS)
Volume 18
MANUSCRIPTS
IN
THE
SCH
O
/
YEN
COLLECTION
CUNEIFORM
TEXTS
VII
Babylonian Divinatory TextsChiefly in the Schyen Collection
by
A. R. George
with an appendix of material from the papers of W. G. Lambert
CDL Press
Bethesda, Maryland
2013
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
4/28
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication
George, A. R.Babylonian divinatory texts chiefly in the Schyen Collection : with an appendix of material from the papers
of W.G. Lambert / by A.R. George. pages cm. (Cornell University studies in Assyriology and Sumerology (CUSAS) ; Volume 18)ISBN 978-1-934309-47-6 (alk. paper)
1. Schyen Collection. 2. DivinationHistoryTo 1500. 3.OmensHistoryTo 1500. 4.Assyro-Baby-lonian religion. 5. Assyro-Babylonian literature. I. Lambert, W. G. (Wilfred G.) II. Title.
BF1762.G46 2013 133.30935dc23
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology
E
DITOR
-
IN
-C
HIEF
* * *
David I. Owen(Cornell University)
___
E
DITORIAL
C
OMMITTEE
* * *
Robert K. Englund(University of California, Los Angeles)
Wolfgang Heimpel(University of California, Berkeley)
Rudolf H. Mayr(Lawrenceville, New Jersey)
Manuel Molina(Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas, Madrid)
Francesco Pomponio(University of Messina)
Walther Sallaberger(University of Munich)
Marten Stol(Leiden)
Karel Van Lerberghe(University of Leuven)
Aage Westenholz(University of Copenhagen)
ISBN 9781934309476
Copyright 2013. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form(beyond that copying permitted in Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except byreviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher, CDL Press, P.O. Box34454, Bethesda, Md. 20827.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
5/28
Table of Contents
v
Statement of Provenance (Ownership History), by Martin Schyen ......................................... vii
Series Editors Preface, by David I. Owen ................................................................................. ix
Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... xiAbbreviations ............................................................................................................ xiiIntroduction ............................................................................................................................ xv
Catalogue ............................................................................................................................ xxiii
Concordances ...................................................................................................................... xxvii
I. Nos. 13. Old Babylonian Divination Prayers ............................................................. 1
II. Nos. 46. Old Babylonian Extispicy Reports .......................................................... 13
III. Nos. 711. Old Babylonian Extispicy Compendia...................................................... 27
IV. Nos. 1216. Other Old Babylonian Omen Lists from Southern Mesopotamia ............ 49
V. Nos. 1721. Late Old Babylonian Omen Lists from Tigunnum ................................ 101
VI. Nos. 2232. Divinatory Texts from the Sealand ......................................................... 129
VII. Nos. 3334. Middle Babylonian Omen Lists .............................................................. 229
VIII. Nos. 3536. Standard Babylonian Omen Lists ........................................................... 259
IX. Nos. 3742. Divinatory Models and Related Objects ................................................ 273
X. No. 43. An Unusual List of Sheep and Goats ...................................................... 281
Appendix. Nos. IXVII Further Divinatory Texts from Tigunnum,
from the Papers of the Late W. G. Lambert .......................................................... 285
References ..............................................................................................................................321
Indexes .................................................................................................................................. 337
Cuneiform Texts ...................................................................................................Plates ICVIII
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
6/28
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
7/28
Statement of Provenance
(
OWNERSHIP
HISTORY
)
vii
The holdings of pictographic and cuneiformtablets, seals, and incantation bowls in theSchyen Collection were collected in the late1980s and 1990s and derive from a great varietyof collections and sources. It would not havebeen possible to collect so many items, of suchmajor textual importance, if it had not beenbased on the endeavor of some of the greatest
collectors in earlier times. Collections that onceheld tablets, seals, or incantation bowls now inthe Schyen Collection are:
1. Institute of Antiquity and Christianity,Claremont Graduate School, Claremont,California (197094)
2. Erlenmeyer Collection and Foundation,Basel (
ca
193588)
3. Cumberland Clark Collection,Bournemouth, UK (1920s1941)
4. Lord Amherst of Hackney, UK (1894
1909)5. Crouse Collection, Hong Kong and New
England (1920s80s)
6. Dring Collection, Surrey, UK (191190)
7. Rihani collection, Irbid (
ca.
1935) andAmman, Jordan (before 196588) andLondon (1988)
8. Lindgren Collection, San Francisco,California (196585)
9. Rosenthal Collection, San Francisco,California (195388)
10. Kevorkian Collection, New York (
ca
193059) and Fund (196077)
11. Kohanim Collection, Tehran, Paris andLondon (195985)
12. Simmonds Collection, UK (194487)
13. Schaeffer Collection, Collge de France,Zrich (1950s)
14. Henderson Collection, Boston,Massachusetts (1930s50s)
15. Pottesman Collection, London (190478)
16. Geuthner Collection, France (1960s80s)
17. Harding Smith Collection, UK (18931922)
18.Rev. Dr. W. F. Williams, Mosul (
ca.
185060)
These collections are the source of almostall the tablets, seals, and incantation bowls. Oth-er items were acquired through the auctionhouses Christies and Sothebys, where in somecases the names of their former owners were notrevealed.
The sources of the oldest collections, suchas Amherst, Harding Smith, and CumberlandClark, were antiquities dealers who acquiredtablets in the Near East in the 1890s to 1930s.During this period many tens of thousands oftablets came on the market, in the summers of
1893 and 1894 alone some 30,000 tablets. Whilemany of these were bought by museums, otherswere acquired by private collectors. Some ofthe older private collections were the source ofsome of the later collections. For instance, alarge number of the tablets in the Crouse col-lection came from the Cumberland Clark,Kohanim, Amherst, and Simmonds collections,among others. The Claremont tablets camefrom the Schaeffer collection, and the Dringtablets came from the Harding Smith collec-tion.
In most cases the original findspots of tabletsthat came on the market in the 1890s to 1930sare unknown, like great parts of the holdings ofmost major museums in Europe and the UnitedStates. The general original archaeological con-text of the tablets and seals is the libraries and
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
8/28
viii Baby l on i an D iv i na t o ry Tex t s
archives of numerous temples, palaces, schools,houses and administrative centers in Sumer,Elam, Babylonia, Assyria, and various city statesin present-day Syria, Turkey, Iraq, and Iran.Many details of this context will not be known
until all texts in both private and public collec-tions have been published and compared witheach other.
Martin Schyen
MANUSCRIPTS
IN
THE
SCH
YEN
COLLECTION
CUNEIFORM
TEXTS
Vol. I. Jran Friberg,A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts
Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical SciencesNew York: Springer, 2007
Vol. II. Bendt Alster, Sumerian Proverbs in the Sch
yen Collection
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 2Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2007
Vol. III. Stephanie Dalley, Babylonian Tablets from the First Sealand Dynasty in the Sch
yen Collection
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 9Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2009
Vol. IV. A. R. George, Babylonian Literary Texts in the Sch
yen Collection
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 10Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2009
Vol. V. Miguel Civil, The Lexical Texts in the Sch
yen Collection
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 12Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2010
Vol. VI. A. R. George, Cuneiform Royal Inscriptions and Related Texts in the Sch
yen Collection
with contributions by M. Civil, G. Frame, P. Steinkeller,F. Vallat, K. Volk, M. Weeden, and C. Wilcke
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 17Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2011
Vol. VII. A. R. George, Babylonian Divinatory Texts Chiefly in the Sch
yen Collection
Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 18Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2013
Other volumes in preparation
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
9/28
Series Editors Preface
ix
The cultural legacy of Mesopotamia continuesto be more broadly illuminated with the sev-enth volume from the Schyen Collection(MSCT 7 = CUSAS 18), once again from thepen of Andrew George. With its publicationthe CUSAS and Schyen series continue tofunction as the major vehicles for the preserva-tion and dissemination of an astonishing varietyof new sources written in Sumerian and Akka-
dian/Babylonian. These new sources enhancegreatly our understanding of Mesopotamianhistory, economics, religion, law, culture, andlanguage from the Archaic and eventuallythrough the Neo-Babylonian periods, therebycovering most of Mesopotamias historical peri-ods. No series in recent history can comparewith the speed and scope of publication that theCUSAS series is providing.
The recent publication of the first SealandDynasty economic records by Stephanie Dalley(CUSAS 9 = MSCT 3) placed the Sealand
dynasty and two of its rulers on firm historicalfootings for the first time. The current volume,containing fifty-five previously unpublisheddivination texts, some entirely new to thegenre, opens a window on what must havebeen a rich and varied literary tradition thatflourished during that dynasty. Divination textsrepresent one of the more difficult and intrigu-ing literary genres from Mesopotamia andGeorges masterful editions and analyses of theastonishing variety of new divination sourcesfrom the Sealand dynasty and from the other-
wise unidentified locations of the northernBabylonian city of Tigunnum
and the southernBabylonian city of Dr-Abieu
add much tothis genre. They reveal the existence of differ-ent, non-canonical, traditions outside main-
stream, southern Babylonia, from where mostof our sources have emerged until now.Georges publication includes selections fromthe lamented Wilfred Lamberts Nachlass
.These particularly welcome additions preservefor posterity Lamberts meticulous work, alongwith those texts he carefully recorded and onwhich he had begun an extended commentary.In keeping with the general format of this series,
all texts are provided with accompanying fullapparati, which include transliterations, transla-tions, commentaries, copies, and photos so thatscholars and students may continue to reliablystudy and elaborate these new sources forMesopotamian civilization. In addition, photosof most tablets also may be accessed andenlarged for more detailed study at http://cuneiform.library.cornell.edu/collections andthe CDLI.
Much continues to be written publicly andspoken privately against the publication of texts
without excavated context. In spite of theincontrovertible importance of the thousandsof texts that have been published so far in thisseries and the many studies that have beenappearing, and will continue to appear, basedon their availability, there still are those indi-viduals and organizations that simply refuse toadmit that their views and imposed regulationshave done more harm than good. Rather thanencouraging the recording, preservation, dis-semination, and publication of unprovenancedtexts, they choose rather to ignore or suppress
them. Those who retain the baseless positionthat texts without excavated context have littlevalue hardly warrant even a brief response. Theinput and international cooperation of scholarsfor this and other volumes are sufficient indica-
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
10/28
x Baby l on i an Div ina t o r y Tex t s
tions of the widespread support of the CUSASand MSCT publications and a rejection of thepolicies of those journal and book editors whoprefer to impose censorship and otherwisechoose to suppress knowledge.
Special thanks are due to Martin Schyen,who continues to open his remarkable collec-tion to scholars for study and publication, to
Andrew George for the astonishing effort thathas gone into the preparation of this and previ-ous CUSAS and MSCT volumes, to ReneeGallery Kovacs for her continuous help andadvice, and to the anonymous donor, who pro-
vided the generous subsidy that made this largeand handsome volume available at a moderateprice.
David I. OwenCurator of Tablet Collections
Jonathan and Jeannette RosenAncient Near Eastern Studies Seminar
Department of Near Eastern StudiesCornell University, Ithaca, New York
March 17, 2013
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
11/28
Acknowledgments
xi
This book presents the results of a study of for-ty-three cuneiform tablets undertaken in Nor-way, England and America during the years20052012. The research was underpinned by agrant from the British Academy and a researchallowance provided by the Faculty of Languag-es and Cultures at the School of Oriental andAfrican Studies, University of London. In Nor-way I enjoyed as ever the generous hospitality
and friendship of Elizabeth Srenssen, MartinSchyen and Jens Braarvig. In America I wastwice a visitor to the Jonathan and JeannetteRosen Ancient Near Eastern Studies Seminar ofCornell University, and the pampered guest ofDavid and Susan Owen in Ithaca and of Frankand Renee Kovacs in California. Renee Kovacsinitiated my interest in the Schyen Collectionsomen texts and was also of enormous help infacilitating my study of the other tablets pub-lished here. To all these institutions and individ-uals, and to the anonymous collector who
allowed me access to those other tablets and sup-ported my work on them, I am deeply grateful.
Photographs of tablets in the Schyen Col-lection were prepared by agents of the SchyenCollection and the Norwegian Institute forPalaeography and Historical Philology, byKlaus Wagensonner of the University ofOxford and by the author, and are reproducedby kind permission of Martin Schyen and JensBraarvig. Images of most of the tablets in theanonymous collection were made at the RosenSeminar, Cornell University, and are published
here by generous leave of David I. Owen,Curator of the Tablet Collections. I am indebt-ed to Robert Englund of the University of Cal-ifornia, Los Angeles, for giving these images ahome online at the website of the CuneiformDigital Library Initiative.
Many of the texts presented here were readin seminar with colleagues and students, espe-cially at the London Cuneiforum in SOAS butalso at the Department of Culture Studies andOriental Languages, University of Oslo. Thecontribution of these seminars to my under-standing of the texts has been substantial and Iexpress my gratitude to those who accompa-nied me in these readings. My work on the
Tigunnum tablets treated in Chapter V hasbenefited substantially from reading fifteen tab-lets in Japan from transliterations prepared byProfessor Akio Tsukimoto of Rikkyo Univer-sity, Tokyo, with whom Dr. Daisuke Shibata ofTsukuba University kindly put me in touch. Irecord here my appreciation of Tsukimotosgenerosity in sharing his work with me, and mythanks for his own comments on my editions oftexts Nos. 1821. Dr. Abraham Winitzer ofNotre Dame University very kindly readthrough the editions of the Old Babylonian
omen lists in Chapter III and made some veryhelpful observations. Faults that remain restwith the author alone.
I am also grateful to Professor Stefan Maulof the University of Heidelberg for sending mea draft of his unpublished chapter, Die Inspek-tion der Opfervgeln, and to Dr. Erle Leichtyof the University of Pennsylvania for sharingwith me his work on two Cornell tablets. LastlyI record my indebtedness to David Owen, andnot only because he has accepted into his beau-tifully produced CUSAS series this latest install-
ment of cuneiform texts from the SchyenCollection. His persistence and leadership ineffecting the publication of the dispersed intel-lectual and historical legacy of ancient Meso-potamia earn the admiration of all those whovalue knowledge.
A.R.G.Buckhurst Hill
March 2013
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
12/28
Abbreviations
xii
AbB Altbabylonische BriefeIII = R. Frankena, Briefe aus der
Leidener Sammlung. Leiden, 1968VII = F. R. Kraus, Briefe aus dem
British Museum. Leiden, 1977IX = M. Stol, Letters from Yale.
Leiden, 1981
X = F. R. Kraus, Briefe aus kleinerenwesteuropischen Sammlungen.
Leiden, 1985XI = Stol 1986
XIV = K. R. Veenhof, Letters in theLouvre. Leiden, 2005
ABRT J. A. Craig,Assyrian and BabylonianReligious Texts. AssyriologischeBibliothek 13. 2 vols. Leipzig, 189597
ACh C. Virolleaud,Lastrologie chaldenne,le livre intitul enuma (Anu) iliBl,
publi, transcrit et traduitItar =AChfasc. 3 and 7, Paris, 1908
and 1909Sn=AChfasc. 1 and 5. Paris, 1908and 1909
Supp.=AChfasc. 9 and 10. Paris,1910
AHw W. von Soden,AkkadischesHandwrterbuch. 3 vols. Wiesbaden,196581
AO Antiquits orientales, tabletsignature, Muse du Louvre
ARM Archives royales de MariV = G. Dossin, Lettres. TCL26.
Paris, 1951VI = J.-R. Kupper, Lettres. TCL27.
Paris, 1953
26/I = Durand 1988
Bab Field number, excavations atBabylon on behalf of the DeutscheOrient-Gesellschaft, 18991917
BAM F. Kcher, Die babylonisch-assyrischeMedizin in Texten und Untersuchun-
gen. 6 vols. Berlin, 196380BBR = Zimmern 1901BE The Babylonian Expedition of the
University of Pennsylvania, SeriesA: Cuneiform Texts
VI/1 = H. Ranke, Babylonian Legaland Business Documents from theTime of the First Dynasty ofBabylon. Philadelphia, 1906
BM Tablet signature, British Museum,London
BRM Babylonian Records in the Libraryof J. Pierpont Morgan
IV = Clay, 1923
CAD The Assyrian Dictionary of the OrientalInstitute of the University of Chicago.Chicago, 19562010
CBS Catalogue of the BabylonianSection, tablet signature, University
Museum, PhiladelphiaCCT Cuneiform Texts fromCappadocian Tablets in the BritishMuseum
4 = S. Smith, CCT4. London, 1927CDLI Cuneiform Digital Library
Initiative, http://cdli.ucla.edu/
CT Cuneiform Texts from BabylonianTablets, &c, in the British Museum
3 = L. W. King,CT3. London, 18984 = T. G. Pinches, CT4. London,
1898
8 = T. G. Pinches, CT8. London,189918 = R. C. Thompson, CT18.
London, 1904
20 = R. C. Thompson, CT20.London, 1904
28 = P. S. P. Handcock, CT 28.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
13/28
Abb r e v i a t i on s xiii
London, 1910
30 = P. S. P. Handcock, CT 30.London, 1911
31 = P. S. P. Handcock, CT31.London, 1911
38 = C. J. Gadd, CT38. London,192539 = C. J. Gadd, CT39. London,
1926
40 = C. J. Gadd, CT40. London,1927
41 = C. J. Gadd, CT41. London,1931
44 = T. G. Pinches, MiscellaneousTexts. London, 1963
51 = C. B. F. Walker, MiscellaneousTexts. London, 1972
CTN Cuneiform Texts from NimrudIV = D. J. Wiseman and J. A. Black,
Literary Texts from the Temple ofNab. London, 1996
DN Divine NameEA J. A. Knudtzon, O. Weber and E.
Ebeling, Die El-Amarna-Tafeln.Vorderasiatische Bibliothek 2.Leipzig, 1915
EAE Enma Anu Ellil , astrological-omenseries
EmarVI D. Arnaud,Recherches au pays dAtata4 = Arnaud 1987
Erm. Tablet signature, State HermitageMuseum, St Petersburg
GAG W. von Soden, Grundriss derakkadischen Grammatik. 2nd edn.Analecta Orientalia 33/47. Rome,1969, 3rd edn 1995
GEN Gilgame, Enkidu and theNetherworld, Sumerian literarycomposition
Gilg. Epic of Gilgame, Babyloniannarrative poem
HISM Object signature, Hirayama IkuoSilkroad Museum, Yamanashi, Japan
HSM Tablet signature, Harvard SemiticMuseum, Cambridge, Mass.
HY Field number, excavations at TellYelkhi (Hamrin), Iraq
IM Tablet signature, Iraq Museum,Baghdad
K Kuyunjik, tablet signature, BritishMuseum, London
KAR E. Ebeling, Keilschrifttexte aus Assurreligisen Inhalts. 2 vols. Wissenschaft-liche Verffentlichungen der
Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 28,34. Leipzig, 191523
KBo Keilschrifttexte aus BoghazkiI = H. Figulla and E. Weidner, KBo
I. Wissenschaftliche Verffent-lichungen der DeutschenOrient-Gesellschaft 30, 1.Leipzig, 1916
KUB Keilschrifturkunden aus BoghazkiIV = E. Weidner, KUB 4. Berlin,
1922
37 = F. Kcher, Literarische Texte in
akkadischer Sprache. Berlin, 1953LB Tablet signature, de Liagre BhlCollection, Leiden
LKA E. Ebeling, Literarische Keilschrifttexteaus Assur. Berlin, 1953
MAH Tablet signature, Muse dArt etdHistoire, Geneva
MB Middle BabylonianMDP Mmoires de la Dlgation en Perse,
etc.
57 = Labat 1974
MLC Tablet signature, J. Pierpont Morgan
Library collection, Yale University,New Haven, Conn.
MS Manuscript Schyen, objectsignature, Schyen Collection, Osloand London
MSCT Manuscripts in the SchyenCollection
6 = A. R. Georgeet al.,Cuneiform RoyalInscriptions and Related Texts in theSchyen Collection. Cornell Univer-sity Studies in Assyriology andSumerology 17. Bethesda, Md.
Msk Field number, excavations at Mes-keneh, Syria
MSL Materials for the Sumerian LexiconIX = B. Landsberger, The Series
AR-ra = ubullu Tablet XV andRelated Texts. Rome, 1967
X = B. Landsberger and E. Reiner,The Series AR-ra = ubullu
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
14/28
xiv Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
Tablets XVI, XVII, XIX andRelated Texts. Rome, 1970
XI = E. Reiner (ed.), The SeriesAR-ra =ubullu, Tablets XXXXIV. Rome, 1974
XIV = Civil et al. 1979Ni Nippur, tablet signature,Archaeological Museum, Istanbul
PBS Publications of the BabylonianSection, the Museum of theUniversity of Pennsylvania
II/2 = A. T. Clay, Documents from theTemple Archives of Nippur Dated inthe Reigns of the Cassite Rulers.Philadelphia, 1912
VII = A. Ungnad, Babylonian Lettersof the ammurapi Period.
Philadelphia, 1915VIII/1 = E. Chiera, Legal andAdministrative Documents fromNippur, Chiefly from the Dynastiesof Isin and Larsa. Philadelphia,1914
OB Old BabylonianR H. C. Rawlinson et al., The Cuneif-
orm Inscriptions of Western AsiaV = T. G. Pinches,A Selection from
the Miscellaneous Inscriptions ofAssyria and Babylonia. 2nd
impression. London, 1909RA Revue dAssyriologie Rm Rassam, tablet signature, British
Museum, London
RN Royal nameSAA State Archives of Assyria
II = S. Parpola and K. Watanabe,Neo-Assyrian Treaties and LoyaltyOaths. Helsinki, 1988
IV = Starr 1990
VIII = Hunger 1992
X = S. Parpola, Letters from Assyrian
and Babylonian Scholars. Helsinki,1993
SB Standard Babylonian
Sm Smith, tablet signature, BritishMuseum, London
STT O. R. Gurney, J. J. Finkelstein andP. Hulin, The Sultantepe Tablets. 2vols. London, 1957, 1964
TCL Textes cuniformes du Louvre
VI = F. Thureau-Dangin, TablettesdUruk lusage des prtres dAnuau temps des Sleucides. Paris, 1922
XVII = G. Dossin, Lettres de lapremire dynastie babylonienne1.
Paris, 1933TIM Texts in the Iraq MuseumIX = J. J. A. van Dijk, Cuneiform
Texts: Texts of Varying Content.Leiden, 1976
TLB Tabulae cuneiformes a F. M. Th. deLiagre Bhl collectae, Leidaeconservatae
II = J. J. A. van Dijk, Textes divers.Leiden, 1957
IV = R. Frankena,AltbabylonischeBriefe. Leiden, 1965
TMB F. Thureau-Dangin, Textes math-matiques babyloniens. Leiden, 1938UCLM Tablet signature, R. H. Lowie
Museum of Anthropology,University of California, Berkeley,Calif.
UMM Tablet signature, UniversityMuseum of Manchester
Uruk Sptbabylonische Texte aus UrukI = Hunger 1976
II = von Weiher 1983
III = von Weiher 1988
IV = von Weiher 1993VAS Vorderasiatische Schriftdenkmler
der Kniglichen [Staatlichen]Museen zu Berlin
XXII = H. Klengel,AltbabylonischeTexte aus Babylon. Berlin, 1983
XXIV = J. J. A. van Dijk, LiterarischeTexte aus Babylon. Berlin, 1987
VAT Vorderasiatische AbteilungTontafeln, tablet signature,Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin
Voc. Vocabulary
YBC Tablet signature, Yale BabylonianCollection, New Haven, Conn.
YOS Yale Oriental Series, BabylonianTexts
X = Goetze 1947a
XI = J. van Dijk et al. 1985ZA Zeitschrift fr Assyriologie
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
15/28
Introduction
xv
Ancient Mesopotamian divinatory texts fallinto several genres. The most important andnumerous are the scholarly and pedagogicaltexts: omen lists, which are overwhelmingly themost common kind of divinatory text, modeltablets, commentaries and other scholia. Theseintellectual forms are academic, and served toelaborate, illustrate and comment on the theo-retical principles of Babylonian divination. The
academic texts bear witness to many differentdisciplines. Without attempting a comprehen-sive list of divinatory media, it is enough to listthe principal disciplines: portents were observedin the inspection of the body of sacrificial sheepand, less commonly, birds, particularly theirinternal organs (extispicy, Babylonian brtu,from br haruspex); in the appearance of oilpoured on water (lecanomancy), of smoke ris-ing from burning incense (libanomancy), and offlour dropped on to a surface (aleuromancy); ineclipses and planetary movements (astrology)
and in natural phenomena such as thunder andearthquakes (collected in the late series Enma
Anu Ellil); in multiple births, human and ani-mal, and malformations of stillborn foetuses(teratomancy, series fiumma izbu); in the localenvironment, where portents were observed ina wide variety of contexts, including topogra-phy and the built and natural environments,agriculture and animal husbandry, the move-ment of animals and birds (augury), the behav-ior of humans, the flames of lamps and torches,and in isolated events such as chariot accidents,
the perceived movement of cult statues andvehicles, etc. (collected in the first-millenniumseries fiumma lu); in sleep and dreams (oneiro-mancy); in the human face and body (physiog-nomy, seriesAlamdimm etc.); and in symptomsof sickness (diagnosis and prognosis, seriesSagig).1
These various disciplines all fall into one oftwo distinct categories of divination that are
characterized by different approaches to theobservation of portents and the response thatfollows. The first category involves the inter-pretation of unprovoked portents (omina oblati-va). The disciplines here are astrology, terato-mancy, augury and other techniques that com-prise the passive observation of the natural andbuilt environment and its populations, animaland human. These divinatory techniques seekto decode signs that occur without any humanintervention.
Divination is often described as a means of
predicting the future. In ancient Mesopotamiait was not so simple as that, except in its medicalapplication. Outside the diagnostic and prog-nostic omens, divination was a type of sooth-saying only in that observed signs were con-sidered to correlate with events that usually hadnot happened yet. The characteristic formal listsof omens paired off portents and predictions,the former as a conditional clause (If such andsuch is seen, called the protasis), the latter as itsoutcome (then such and such will happen,the apodosis). A lunar eclipse on the fifteenth
1 A careful description and comprehensive bibliogra-phy of the various categories of omen text is given byMaul 2003. For fiumma lusee in addition Freedman2006; for Enma Anu Ellilalso Reiner and Pingree2005, Gehlken 2012.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
16/28
xvi Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
day of the third month, for example, was pairedwith a statement predicting the death of a kingin a palace revolt (text No. 13: 21). It can alreadybe seen that an analogy is operating in this omen:the eclipse of one of the major celestial bodies
leads to a prediction of the demise of an earthlyruler. From that obvious beginning arose thediscipline of astrology. The theoretical under-pinnings of Babylonian divination will be con-sidered later. For the moment one may remarkthat the equation of sun and moon with heads ofstate meant that astrology was a divinatory dis-cipline of especial importance in governmentand diplomacy.
In studying Babylonian omen texts it isimportant to reject the pairing of portent andprediction as evidence of fatalism, in the sense of
an inevitable, pre-determined future. The kingwhom we met in the previous paragraph did nothave to die. The Babylonians and Assyrians un-derstood naturally occurring, unprovoked por-tents not as statements of a fixed future but ascommunications from the gods that invited aresponse from those who could decode them. Ifthe signs were unfavorable, they were taken aswarnings, and it was then imperative to elimi-nate their threat by magic means. The ancienttext known today as the Diviners Manual in-structs that an evil prognostication would onlyoccur if it was not eliminated by the correctmagical response (Oppenheim 1974: 200 l. 46).This elimination was achieved through apotro-paic rituals accompanied by incantations, by lit-anies chanted to appease the gods, or by both.These two activities were known respectively inBabylonian as iptu (from ipu exorcist,medicine-man) and kaltu(from kal lamen-tation-singer). The response to ill-boding signswas articulated in ancient Mesopotamia as thedispelling of evil (Babylonian namburb, Maul
1994). Averting the consequences of bad por-tents was not a matter of small-time superstition;it was a central concern of ancient Mesopota-mian religion.
The second category of divination compris-es techniques that were perceived to induce a
portent. They typically involve the ritual use ofa divinatory medium especially chosen and pre-pared for the purpose. The rituals purpose wasto invite the divine authorities, explicitly or tac-itly, to encode ominous signs in the medium for
the diviner to decipher. In ancient Mesopota-mia the most prominent discipline here wasextispicy, in which the divinatory medium wasthe body and insides of a sacrificial victim, usu-ally a male lamb. Other media were oil, smokeand flour, which are mostly attested in a veryfew texts of the early second millennium butsuspected of being commonly practised none-theless. The expensive technique of extispicy,patronized by the royal court and the wealthy,naturally attracted more scholastic attentionthan divination by cheaper media.
Divination by induced portent is oftenreferred to as provoked or impetrated (ominaimpetrativa). This kind of divination worked as awarning system in the same way as the first but,in addition, lent itself early to the developmentof a question-and-answer dialogue, in which,after due ritual, the diviner first posed a questionto the gods (the oracular query) and then soughttheir answer in the divinatory medium. The ques-tion was phrased so as to elicit a simple response,positive or negative. Questions could be askedon all manner of topics, private and public: thesafety and health of an individual, the prospectsof success in trade, marriage and war, the righttime to embark on a journey or military manoeu-vre, the correct moment to conduct a religiousritual or dedicate an image, appointments ofofficials and priests, etc.
In extispicy the answer to the clients ques-tion was acquired by cross-referencing ominoussigns with their predictions, as set out in lists ofomens. Their form is the same combination ofprotasis and apodosis as in unprovoked omens.
In provoked omens the apodosis carried herme-neutic value, identifying the portent as favorableor unfavorable. A majority of favorable portentsobserved in the extispicy indicated a positiveanswer to the oracular query, a majority of unfa-vorable portents communicated the reverse.2
2 On the theory and practice of Babylonian extispicysee, e.g., Jeyes 1980, Maul 2003: 7783, Veldhuis 2006.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
17/28
In t r o du c t i on xvii
This procedure of question and answerprobably first emerged as a method of corrobo-rating the value of unprovoked portents.Uncertainty in their interpretation could beresolved through extispicy, by asking the appro-
priate question. Historical instances of the cor-roborative function of extispicy in respondingto unprovoked omens are documented in thecorrespondence of diviners. At the court of Marion the middle Euphrates in the eighteenth cen-tury, extispicies were reported to have beendone to determine whether an ill-boding lunareclipse compromised the kings safety (it didnot), to clarify the significance of dreams, and toidentify the causes of illness (ARM 26/I nos. 8183, 136, 142). At the Assyrian court in the sev-enth century, documents report extispicies per-
formed to assess the import of a bird of ill omenand the implications of symptoms of sickness(SAA X nos. 183 and 315).
By virtue of its perceived capacity for check-ing the intentions of the gods, extispicy was animportant tool in good government. It becamethe preferred divinatory technique in determin-ing that decisions in matters of strategic impor-tance to the state royal, military, political,economic and religious were made in accor-dance with divine approval. The correspon-dence from Mari shows that extispicy wasalready much employed by the state and its ser-vants in the eighteenth century BCE (Durand1988: 3373, Heimpel 2003: 173248). Theresponse to portents called for the co-operation ofmen trained in different academic disciplines.The collaboration of astrologer (Enma Anu Ellilexpert), lamentation-singer (kal), exorcist-cum-medicine man (ipu) and haruspex (br),is well attested at the Assyrian court (Parpola1993), and was assuredly necessary in earlierperiods too.
It has been noted that the prediction in theapodosis of a typical Babylonian omen is not a
prophecy of a fixed outcome but a warning.Alongside this must be considered anotheressential point, that the combination of portentand prediction is an intellectual construct. Thisbecomes clear if the two elements of the omen
are studied separately.Portents were usually naturally occurring
signs that were ostensibly rooted in observation.This led to the view, once widely current inAssyriology, that ancient Mesopotamian divina-tion was based on real experience. However,recent studies of the omen corpora have discred-ited that view (e.g. Koch-Westenholz 1995: 1319, Brown 2000: 10813, Rochberg 2009, Win-itzer 2011). There are several reasons for reject-ing the old position. A telling one is provided bya small number of portents that describe impos-
sible events that could never have beenobserved. Already in the Old Babylonian peri-od, lists of omens incorporated such events asportents. Such portents have not yet been col-lected systematically. Good examples in OldBabylonian tablets occur in lunar-eclipse lists, asdemonstrated in the introduction to texts Nos.13 and 14 in Chapter V, but the most conspic-uously absurd example known to me is the sunsighted at midnight.3The existence of impossi-ble portents does not mean that the compilers ofomens were stupid. These men lived in a worldwhere, as now, a lifetime of experience taughteach and every one of them that the sun sets atdusk and rises at dawn. Just as today, their ances-tors had conceived a model of the universe toaccount for this. Though their model was one inwhich the sun passed around the earth, there wasno more room in it for a sighting of the sun atmidnight than there is in todays scientificallyproved model, in which the earth orbits the sun.And on the basis of experience and model,Babylonians generally were surely inclined, just
as we are today, to infer this about the future,that the sun would never be seen at midnight.
3 BM 97210: 34: DIfi dama(utu) ina qabltim(murub4)
tim innamir(igi.du) ba-ar-tum a-na arrim(lugal) (If) the sun is sighted in the middle watch(of the night): revolt against the king. The existenceof this tablet has been reported by Francesca Roch-berg (Rochberg-Halton 1984: 132 n. 21, 1988: 9 n.
5, Rochberg 2006: 340) and Matthew Rutz (2006: 72n. 42). Its text, in late Old Babylonian script, isknown to me from photographs posted online at ht-tp://www.britishmuseum.org/research.aspx and atransliteration by C. B. F. Walker. I am grateful to allthree scholars for permission to quote it here.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
18/28
xviii Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
What happened in divination, it seems, was thatthe compilers of omens consciously rejectedthat inference. They thought not only in termsof their own experience and the received wis-dom of their models, but they deliberately
imagined phenomena which they had not expe-rienced, even though such phenomena contra-dicted the model and were against all expec-tations. They can only have done this by rea-soning that they were without empiricalevidencethat such phenomena could not occur. If so, itcan be said that they adopted a strictly empiricistresponse to the natural world, resisting thetemptation of jumping to conclusions on thebasis of their own limited experience and inher-ited expectations. In this suspicion of inductiveinference they anticipated the position taken by
the eighteenth-century Scottish empiricist phi-losopher David Hume. Events that conflict withnatural laws can be reasonednot to be possible,but they cannot be experiencednot to be possible.
So much for portents. The predictions wereany one (sometimes two) of a large repertoire ofmany hundreds of standard sentences. The veryfact that they are so standardized speaks for theirorigin in reason rather than experience. It hasbecome ever more apparent that Babylonianscholars employed several methods in attachinga prediction to a portent: the common toolswere symbolism, analogy, paranomasia, etymo-logical speculation and folkloric allusion (e.g.Starr 1983a: 812, Glassner 1984, Rochberg2004: 5558, 2009: 2022, George 2010). Inastrology it has already been noted that themajor celestial bodies, sun and moon, wereinterpreted as symbolic counterparts of earthlyrulers, and the eclipse of such a body signifiedthe analogous demise of a king. In extispicy toothe same devices were at work. For example, thegall-bladder, the major feature of the visceral
surface of the sheeps liver, was often under-stood to stand for the king, a symbolic equation.Thus the presence underneath the liver of twogall-bladders one more than usual usuallysignified rivalry between two rulers (or would-be rulers). Right was the side identified with theclients interests (equivalent in Ciceros termi-nology topars familiaris), left with those of hisopponent (pars hostilis or inimica). If the left-hand
of the two gall-bladders was wrapped aroundthe right, it signified usurpation of the throne(text No. 9 5), a prediction that maps by anal-ogy the portents dominance of good (right) bybad (left) on to the field of the two rulers. From
the point of view of the diviners client, oftenthe king, the prediction of a usurper is naturallyunfavorable, and would be reckoned with thenegative omens.
The hermeneutic tools operating in the caseof the two gall-bladders are clear. The con-structed nature of the typical omen finds furtherexpression in the elaboration of systematic pat-terns in both portent and prediction. So in textNo. 10 8'10' portentous smears of blood ondifferent parts of the gall-bladder attract predic-tions of wounds to different members of the
royal entourage minister, diviner and cup-bearer. Other patterns associate different parts ofan observed feature with such variables as sec-tions of the army (e.g. No. 25 13 and paral-lels) and times of day and night (e.g. No. 25 49 and parallels).
While it remains the case that in manyomens the connection between portent andprediction is obscure to us, the combination ofportent and prediction was probably alwayswithout empirical basis, that is, without foun-dation in historical precedent. It is true that inlater lists of astrological omens some lunar-eclipse portents were matched not with predic-tions but with a limited number of past historicalevents notably the downfall of Akkade andthe sack of Ur in the reign of king Ibbi-Suen
but there are good grounds for rejecting theseas arising from an actual coincidence of the por-tents and these events in history (Al-Rawi andGeorge 2006: 24). Similarly the omens oftencalled historical, in which a portent is associ-ated with a legendary or historical ruler, such as
Gilgame or Sargon of Akkade, are also of dubi-ous historical worth, even if some of them werecomposed as late as the reign of Ashurbanipal(Starr 1985). In making the connection betweena portent and a supposed historical context, sev-eral of them employ such hermeneutic tech-niques as analogy and paranomasia, and they areof value for neither the history of events nor thehistory of divination (Cooper 1980, Starr 1986).
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
19/28
In t r o du c t i on xix
It is clear from the two tell-tale features ofimpossible portents and artificially generatedpredictions that in the periods from which wehave evidence, ancient Mesopotamian divina-tion was no longer dependent on empirical
observation, if it ever had been. Diviners wereusing sets of theoretical rules to generate andencode new omens, and were able to elaboratethe existing corpus almost limitlessly (Winitzer2006). In the first millennium BCEa considerablescholarship grew up that was concerned withthe theoretical basis of extispicy, reflecting espe-cially on the hermeneutic links between portentand prediction, and the positive or negative val-ue of that prediction. A problem for modernscholars is that while we can identify some of therules in play, we do not fully understand this
Babylonian language of signs (George 2010,Frahm 2010).
One corollary of the breaking of the con-nection between the matter of the predictionand the prospective repetition of historicalevents is that the predictions can be studied fromnon-historical perspectives. They have alreadybeen presented as evidence for daily life, publicand private (Oppenheim 1936, Nougayrol1971b, Koch-Westenholz 2002b). They aremore interesting still as sources for Babylonianpsychology. In characterizing omen apodoses asdidactic rather than functional, Ivan Starr hasrightly observed that they serve as a reflectionof the fears and aspirations of the people ofMesopotamia, rather than as statements of real-ity (Starr 1986: 630). The topics do indeedillustrate many universal human anxieties.Prominent subjects in the private realm are thefaithfulness of wives, the profligacy of heirs, thesuccess of the harvest and business, the loss ofproperty and livestock, the threats of droughtand famine, lions and rabid dogs, sickness and
plague, etc. In the public domain the anxietiesexpressed relate chiefly to the king: usurpationof the throne, loyalty of ministers and sons, suc-cess of the army, social unrest and rebellion, lossof territory and wealth, etc.
A further corollary lies in the history ofideas. The newly clarified intellectual context ofomen lists has led them recently to be charac-terized as texts where one may speculate about
the meaning of things (Veldhuis 2006: 493).Babylonian scholars speculated relentlessly onmeaningful interconnections in the observeduniverse, for example between constellations,cities, plants and minerals (Weidner 1967) and,
more pertinently, between ominous parts of theliver, deities, months and constellations (vonWeiher 1993 no. 159). Divination took part inthis cosmic network of interrelations (Koch-Westenholz 2000: 12). Speculation about hid-den meaning was the hallmark of Babylonianscholars theoretical exploration of the worldand its contents. The list was their equally char-acteristic format for conveying knowledge. Theomen lists, which represent a large proportion ofthe achievement of Babylonian scholarship,constitute as a whole an important statement
about the Babylonians understanding of theworld. In elaborating thousands of examples ofhidden interrelations between realities andideas, the manifold lists of omens are the out-come of cumulative attempts to embrace theentire universe in a system of reciprocal infer-ences. As an intellectual concept this can per-haps be seen as a Babylonian counterpart to themore modern idea of a universal theory ofeverything.
Not all ancient Mesopotamian divinatorytexts are academic and theoretically based.Alongside the omen lists and other scholarly andpedagogical texts are compositions of morepractical application, deriving from the profes-sional practice of divination. Some of these textsare prescriptive, serving to maintain correct pro-cedures, especially the ritual acts that precededan act of extispicy and the various prayers thataccompanied those acts (Starr 1983a, Zimmern1901: nos. 120, 71101). Others are more ephe-meral, arising from particular instances of prac-tice: reports on the outcome of individual acts of
extispicy (Kraus 1985, Koch-Westenholz 2002a),and documents that report or record other omi-nous portents, on earth and in the sky; particu-larly numerous are astrological reports sent tothe Assyrian court in the seventh century BCE(Hunger 1992). The oracular queries that wereput to the deity in the course of the ritual of actsof extispicy were originally ephemeral, but pro-fessional pride ensured that many queries of reli-
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
20/28
xx Baby l on i an Div ina t o r y Tex t s
gious and historical importance were retained inacademic libraries and became part of the tradi-tional scholia in Babylonia and Assyria (Lambert2007, Starr 1990).
The purpose of this volume is to make pub-
lic those cuneiform texts in the Schyen Col-lection that fall into the category of ancientMesopotamian divinatory texts. The SchyenCollection does not hold examples of all thegenres noted above, for products of the laterperiods in the history of cuneiform writing arevery rare in the collection. Not surprisingly, ithas very few exemplars of the canonical omenseries and lacks completely omen commentariesand astrological reports. No Assyrian documentsare present: as the volumes title suggests, thetexts are all composed in varieties of Babylonian.
The volume is divided into chapters, partlyby genre, partly by period and partly by prove-nance. Chapter I contains two divinationprayers, one highly literary and unusual, and anoracular query, all written in the Old Babylo-nian period, i.e. the third and fourth centuries ofthe second millennium BCE (texts Nos. 13).Three Old Babylonian extispicy reports popu-late Chapter II, one deriving from the archive ofDr-Abieu and reflecting a precise momentin history, the others probably academic modeltexts (Nos. 46). Chapter III gives editions offive Old Babylonian lists of extispicy omens, alltreating ominous features of the sheeps liverand gall-bladder (Nos. 711). Five Old Babylo-nian omen lists pertaining to other divinatorydisciplines (teratomancy, lunar eclipses, medicaldiagnosis and prognosis, and household por-tents) are collected in Chapter IV (Nos. 1216).Two chapters are devoted to the presentation ofdivinatory texts, mostly omen lists, from thedecades either side of the end of the Old Baby-lonian period: five late Old Babylonian omen
lists from Tigunnum in northern Mesopotamiain Chapter V (extispicy and teratomancy, Nos.
1721), and eleven texts from a scholarly archivedating back to the first Sealand dynasty in Chap-ter VI (extispicy, teratomancy, Nos. 2232).Two Middle Babylonian omen lists from thelate second millennium occupy Chapter VII;one treats extispicy, the other lunar eclipses inthe third month (Nos. 3334). Chapter VIII
presents Neo-Babylonian manuscripts of sec-tions of two of the great canonical omen seriesof the first millennium, Tablet I of fiumma izbu(human pregnancy and birth, No. 35) and Tab-let LXXIX of fiumma lu (augury, No. 36).
Chapter IX is given over to model tablets andrelated objects: two depict different arrange-ments of the sheeps colon, one perhaps is anatypical example of a model sheeps liver (Nos.3742). In Chapter X is edited an unusual textthat has some of the formal characteristics of anomen list but is not a succession of decoded por-tents (No. 43).
Not all the tablets in this volume are held bythe Schyen Collection. Ten members of theSealand archive treated in Chapter VI are cur-rently in a private collection whose owner wish-
es to remain anonymous. The same collectionprovided one example each of the genres divi-nation prayer and extispicy report. The appen-dix makes available seventeen tablets whosewhereabouts are unknown at the time of writ-ing: a selection of the divinatory texts fromTigunnum recorded in the scholarly papers ofthe late W. G. Lambert (Nos. IXVII).
This book adds to current knowledge fifty-five previously unpublished divinatory tablets.Some of them are important for the rareness ofthe texts they contain especially an excep-tionally well-preserved Old Babylonian tabletof teratomancy (No. 12), two early lunar-eclipseomen tablets (Nos. 1314), a huge tablet ofhousehold omens, written in eighteen columnsbut sadly not fully legible (No. 16), and a tabletof prognostic omens (No. 15). Other tabletsreport the presence of Babylonian divination inplaces from which little evidence for it has so farbeen available: eastern Babylonia in the periodof the first Sealand dynasty, which emerges as alink between Old Babylonian divinatory schol-
arship and the omen texts written at Susa later inthe second millennium (Nos. 2232); and thepalace of king Tunip-Teub at Tigunnum innorth Mesopotamia, where a tradition of divi-nation associated with the temple of Adad inAleppo was studied alongside texts originallyimported from Babylonia (Nos. 1721, appen-dix Nos. IXVII).
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
21/28
In t r o du c t i on xxi
In addition to the gain in primary sourcesand in understanding of the transmission ofBabylonian divination to the periphery and itsevolution there, this book also adds to the pic-ture, already painted above, of the huge variety
of divinatory techniques developed in ancientMesopotamia. Three texts report two divinato-ry media that are new to us, both belonging tothe category of provoked omens and both attest-
ed on the northern fringes of Mesopotamia: abirds heart dropped in water (texts Nos. 18 andappendix No. XV), which is a technique thatcombines extispicy with lecanomancy; and aewe confined in a building overnight (appendix
No. II), which is a practice that seeks to induceby artificial means a portent similar to those thatoccur without human provocation in the ani-mal-behavior omens of fiumma lu.
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
22/28
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
23/28
Catalogue
xxiii
1 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 476522 MS 3363Divination prayer, Old Babylonian, 13+13 ll.
2 Clay tablet, portrait format, top half 446819 Divination prayer, Old Babylonian, 13+14+2+3 ll.
3 Clay tablet, square, complete 515320 MS 3057Oracular petition, Old Babylonian, 10+1+10 ll.
4 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 5311429 MS 3218/6Extispicy report, Late Old Babylonian, Abieu,19+[x]+21+4 ll.
5 Clay tablet, landscape format, near complete 885325 MS 3058Extispicy report, Old Babylonian, undated, 12+4 ll.
6 Clay tablet, portrait format, complete 445415 Extispicy report, Old Babylonian, undated, 11+11+2 ll.
7 Clay tablet, near square format, complete 779022 MS 2225Liver omens (naplatum), Old Babylonian, 12+13 ll.
8 Clay tablet, landscape format, complete 775725 MS 3066Liver omens (naraptum), Old Babylonian, 9+9 ll.
9 Clay tablet, landscape format, complete 735824 MS 3078Liver omens (gall-bladder), Old Babylonian, 12+9 ll.
10 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 6410933 MS 3295Liver omens (gall-bladder, naplatum), Old Babylonian,2+2 cols., 26+19+26+25 ll.
11 Clay tablet, portrait format, major portion 10011730 MS 2813Liver omens (ubnum), Old Babylonian,2+2 cols., 23+24+11+8 ll.
Measurements CollectionText Description in mm (WHD) number
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
24/28
xxiv Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
12 Clay tablet, portrait format, complete 11817130 MS 3000Malformed-birth omens, Old Babylonian, 60+45 ll.
13 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 11018040 MS 3118Lunar-eclipse omens, Late Old Babylonian, 26+3+31 ll.
14 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 13022040 MS 3117Lunar-eclipse omens, Late Old Babylonian, 46+40 ll.
15 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower three-quarters 7810432 MS 2670Diagnostic and prognostic omens, Old Babylonian, 22+2+26 ll.
16 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 24021050 MS 3104
Domestic omens, Old Babylonian, 8+1+9 cols.,obv.: 23+34+29+35+37+35+34+28 ll.; right edge: 20 ll.;rev.: 19+27+30+31+29+31+35+35+27 ll.; top edge: 8 ll.;left edge: 4 ll.
17 Clay tablet, fragment 377028 MS 2796Liver omens (gall-bladder), Late Old Babylonian,Tigunnum, 12 ll.
18 Clay tablet, portrait format, top two-thirds 9710323 MS 1807Birds-heart omens, Late Old Babylonian,Tigunnum, 17+18+2+1 ll.
19 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower two-fifths 11010928 MS 1805Malformed-birth omens, Late Old Babylonian,Tigunnum, 25+25+2 ll.
20 Clay tablet, portrait format, top portion 798937 MS 1806Malformed-birth omens, Late Old Babylonian,Tigunnum, 17+9 ll.
21 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower two-fifths 707234 MS 2797Malformed-birth omens, Late Old Babylonian,Tigunnum, 7+4+16 ll.
22 Clay tablet, landscape format, major portion 12711426 Omens, carcass of sacrificial animal,1st Sealand dynasty, 36+30 ll.
23 Clay tablet, portrait format, major portion 13016334 Liver omens (p bu), 1st Sealand dynasty, 40+3+13 ll.
Measurements CollectionText Description in mm (WHD) number
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
25/28
Cata l o gu e xxv
24 Clay tablet, upper right portion 1058832 Liver omens (bb ekalli, ulmu), 1st Sealand dynasty, 26+28+4 ll.
25 Clay tablet, top portion 1157820 Liver omens (kak imitti), 1st Sealand dynasty, 21+15 ll.
26 Clay tablet, portrait format, major portion 9413023 Liver omens (kak umli), 1st Sealand dynasty, 41+24 ll.
27 Clay tablet, lower right fragment 8513632 Liver omens (gall-bladder), 1st Sealand dynasty, 39+42 ll.
28 Clay tablet, portrait format, top half 1019622 Lung omens, 1st Sealand dynasty, 28+15 ll.
29 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower half 11210023 Malformed-birth omens, 1st Sealand dynasty, 28+3+32 ll.
30 Clay tablet, landscape format, right-hand portion 736423 MS 2420Omen apodoses, 1st Sealand dynasty, 19+7 ll.
31 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower half 11512632 Gut omens, Middle Babylonian, Sealand, 40+4+39 ll.
32 Clay tablet, upper left fragment 479528
Diagrams of gut, 1st Sealand dynasty, 3+6 ll.
33 Clay tablet, square, near complete 757024 MS 3176/2Liver (manzzuetc.) and lung omens, Middle Babylonian,30+19 ll.
34 Clay tablet, landscape format, left portion + patch 825523 MS 3119Lunar-eclipse omens, Middle Babylonian, 10+8 ll.
35 Clay tablet, portrait format, top portion 947028 MS 1808Human-birth omens, fiumma izbuI, Neo-/Late Babylonian,21+12 ll.
36 Clay tablet, portrait format, lower portion 10512633 MS 1687Augury, fiumma luLXXIX, Neo-Babylonian,2+2 cols., 30+34+33+28 ll.
37 Clay tablet, square, near complete + patch 575518 MS 3080Diagrams of gut, Old Babylonian, uninscribed
Measurements CollectionText Description in mm (WHD) number
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
26/28
xxvi Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
38 Clay cone, complete 3535 MS 3195
Diagram and model of gut, Old Babylonian, uninscribed
39 Clay tablet, square, complete 939320 MS 4515Drawing of spiral labyrinth, Old Babylonian(?), uninscribed
40 Clay tablet, portrait format, complete 10311720 MS 3194Drawing of spiral labyrinth, Old Babylonian(?), uninscribed
41 Clay tablet, portrait format, near complete 8311620 MS 45168 drawings of labyrinths, Old Babylonian(?), uninscribed
42 Clay model, cut down 42
66
9 MS 3034Model of liver(?), Middle Babylonian, 6+5+1 ll.
43 Clay tablet, landscape format, near complete 906223 MS 3331List of deformed(?) sheep, Old Babylonian, 16+1+17+1 ll.
Measurements CollectionText Description in mm (WHD) number
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
27/28
Concordances
xxvii
1687 35
1805 19
1806 20
1807 18
1808 36
2225 7
2420 30
2670 15
2796 17
2797 21
2813 11
3000 12
3034 42
3057 3
3058 5
3066 8
3078 9
3080 37
3104 16
3117 14
3118 13
3119 34
3176/2 33
3194 40
3195 38
3218/6 4
3295 10
3331 43
3363 1
4515 39
4516 41
MS No. Text No. MS No. Text No. MS No. Text No.
1. Concordance of tablet numbers in the Schyen Collection (MS) and text numbers in this volume.
2. Concordance of text numbers in this volume and entry numbers in the database of the CuneiformDigital Library Initiative (CDLI), which offers high-resolution images of all the objects publishedin this book, sometimes in a fuller photographic record. The URL of an individual tablet at CDLIis the domain address http://cdli.ucla.edu/ followed by the CDLI entry number, e.g. text No. 1has the URL http://cdli.ucla.edu/P252304.
Text No. CDLI No. Text No. CDLI No. Text No. CDLI No.
1 P252304
2 P431298
3 P252066
4 P342689
5 P252067
6 P431299
7 P251421
8 P252075
9 P252087
10 P252236
11 P251860
12 P252027
13 P252127
14 P252126
15 P251708
16 P252113
17 P251842
18 P250501
19 P250499
20 P250500
21 P251843
22 P431300
23 P431301
24 P431302
25 P431303
26 P431304
27 P431305
28 P431306
29 P431307
30 P251603
31 P431308
32 P431309
33 P342641
34 P252128
35 P250502
36 P250457
37 P252089
38 P274588
39 P253616
40 P274587
41 P253617
42 P252040
43 P252272
8/9/2019 Babylonian Divinatory Text _intro Only _CUSAS-18-Frontal
28/28
xxviii Baby l on i an Div ina to r y Tex t s
Friberg 2007: 219, 489 39
Friberg 2007: 223 38
Friberg 2007: 224, 490 40
Friberg 2007: 228, 489 41
Leichty and Kienast 2003 36
4. Published duplicates and parallel texts
Publication Text No.
AO 7539 (Nougayrol 1971a) 31
BM 13915 (Aro and Nougayrol 1973 no. 3) 9
EAEXVII/2 34fiumma luLXXIX 36fiumma izbu I 35
YOS X 31 10
YOS X 56 12
3. Concordance of previous publication with text numbers in this volume
Publication Text No.