B. Singh and M. Birch 02/05/201 3 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation Compilation and Evaluation of %P n and T 1/2 Data for β-delayed Neutron Emitters Balraj Singh, Michael Birch, Alan Chen McMaster University Pre-CRP North American Workshop on Beta-delayed neutron emission 2-3 May 2013 at JIHIR (ORNL, USA)
23
Embed
B. Singh and M. Birch 02/05/2013Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation Compilation and Evaluation of %P n and T 1/2 Data for β-delayed Neutron Emitters Balraj.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Compilation and Evaluation of %Pn and T1/2 Data for β-delayed
Neutron Emitters
Balraj Singh, Michael Birch, Alan ChenMcMaster University
Pre-CRP North American Workshop on Beta-delayed neutron emission 2-3 May 2013 at JIHIR (ORNL, USA)
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Outline
• Status of available compilations/evaluations• Current status of beta-delayed neutron
probability measurements• Compilation/Evaluation procedures• A<72 compilation, evaluation, systematics• Examples• Future plan for A>72, fission region• Conclusions
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Status of available compilations/Evaluation
– G. Rudstam, K. Aleklett, L. Sihver: ADNDT 53, 1 (1993): evaluation and measurements: Cu-75 to La-150: 93 nuclides : only 31 references cited.
– B. Pfeiffer, K.L. Kratz, P. Moller: Prog. Nucl. Energy 41, 39 (2002): compilation Cu-73 to La-150: 129 nuclides. No documentation or source references.
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Evaluation Policies• Not just averaging of all experimental numbers, critical
assessment of individual measurements• Recommended value is the weighted average of the most
reliable measurements; or the most reliable measurement out of a set.
• Most recent value taken when measurements repeated by a group over time using same method.
• When an average is taken, the assigned uncertainty is not lower than the lowest experimental uncertainty in the dataset that is being averaged.
• Full documentation is kept concerning how the evaluated result was obtained, e.g. which results were considered for averaging, and why.
• Primary versus secondary (grey) literature; latter used with caution, and if possible in consultation with the authors.
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Work Done So Far: A ≤ 72• The P1n (including P2n, P3n) probabilities and/or half-
lives have been evaluated for a total of 110 nuclides in the A ≤ 72 mass region; another 63 for half-lives only; total of ~200 papers consulted. McMaster+IAEA+GSI+BNL:
• M. Birch, B. Singh, D. Abriola, I. Dillmann, A. Sonzogni, E. McCutchan, T. Johnson
• Systematics:– The Kratz-Herrmann Formula (KHF: ZP 263 (1973) 435)
does not make accurate predictions in this mass region– The ratio of Pn to T1/2 shows a better correlation with
the Q(β-n) energy window for the decay
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
A ≤ 72 Systematics
Fit
•Only data with an uncertainty in Pn ≤ 25% used•Predictions within one order of magnitude
a = 0.0282(53)b = 4.351(81)
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Example: 137INSR Reference Half-life (s) %P(n) Method Comments
2013Ye02 6.80(88), 6.88(105), 6.95(76)
Low-energy recoilβ-delayed γ-raysβ singles
2010MaZS ~6.9 n Preliminary Result
1993Ru01* 24.13(12) 7.46(30) n, β-
1980ReZQ* 7.6(8) Ion counting Also 1977Re05,P(n)=8.5(9)
1980Lu04 24.3 6.7(4) n, β- Same group as 1993Ru01
1978Kr15 24.3(8) 6.1(5) fission Also 1974Kr21: mixed activity
1975As04* 24.8(2) 6.1(8) n, β-
1974Gr29 24.5(2) n Same group as 1993Ru01, also 1974Ru08, 1976Lu02
1972Sc48 24.3(8) 6.6(8) fission Adjusted in 1993Ru01 from 5.2(7). Also 1969ScZY
1971De35* 24.7(2) 8.6(12) Gamma,Xe-137
1964Ar24 24 3.0(5) n, β- Outlier: Chauvenet’s criterion
1959Pe28 24.4(4) fission
B. Singh and M. Birch
Example: 137I
• P(n) : weighted average (LRSW) = 7.29 (33) %, reduced χ2=1.0. Uncertainty of 0.30 in 1993Ru01 increased to 0.46 to limit its relative weight to 50%.
B. Singh and M. Birch02/05/2013 Beta-Delayed Neutron Data Evaluation
Future evaluation plan• Checks on first draft of A<72 region. Plans to publish
this in NDS by the end of 2013.• Compilation/evaluation of A=72-150 region starts next
week. Much bigger task than A<72 region• Hope to complete first draft by the end of 2014.• Checking may take another six months or so.• Next step is to think about database development: its
• We feel that a dedicated evaluation of %B-n data and associated half-lives with full details will be useful. It may provide initiative for new experiments where data are lacking or inadequate.
• McMaster’s group has completed a first draft of evaluation of A<72 region nuclei. It is being checked by collaborators.
• Work on A=73-150 region will soon start with estimated first draft in about a year and half. Probably ~300 papers.
• Will keep track of new measurements, and incorporate these in the evaluation of two mass regions as needed.
• We will take part in discussions of a suitable database of these data.