Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG 2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate Course Copyright American College of Gastroenterology 1 Current Treatment Options for Patients Hospitalized with Severe UC Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG Professor of Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Medical Director, Digestive Health Center Classification of UC Severity MILD • <4 stools/day ± blood • Normal ESR • No signs of toxicity MODERATE • ≥4 stools/day ± blood • Minimal signs of toxicity SEVERE • >6 bloody stools/day • Fever • Tachycardia • Anemia or ESR FULMINANT • >10 stools/day • Continuous bleeding • Toxicity • Abdominal tenderness/distension • Transfusion requirement • Colonic dilation on x-ray Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Br Med J. 1955;2:1041. Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:501.
15
Embed
B. MD, FACG - American College of Gastroenterologys3.gi.org/meetings/wb2016/16ACG_VGS_Regional_0016.pdfTitle Microsoft PowerPoint - Sun-Hanauer-Traetment Options for Severe IBD Author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 1
Current Treatment Options for Patients Hospitalized with Severe UCStephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACGProfessor of MedicineFeinberg School of MedicineMedical Director, Digestive Health Center
tenderness/distension• Transfusion requirement• Colonic dilation on x-ray
Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Br Med J. 1955;2:1041.Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:501.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 2
Indications for Hospitalization
• Severe luminal disease
• Suspected toxic megacolon
• Failure of outpatient medications
•Venous thrombosis
• Infection
•Medication‐related adverse event
Variable Mild Severe Fulminant
N Stools < 4 > 6 > 10
Blood Intermittent Frequent Continuous
Temp Normal > 37.5 > 37.5
Pulse Normal > 90 > 90
Hgb Normal < 75% nl Transfusion
ESR < 30 > 30 > 30
Xray Thumbprinting Dilation
Exam Tenderness Distension/ tenderness
What Does “Severe” Mean?
Dickinson RJ. Gut. 1985; 26:1380-84.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 3
Mayo Endoscopic Subscore
NormalColon (0)
MildUlcerativeColitis (1)
ModerateUlcerativeColitis (2)
SevereUlcerativeColitis (3)
Endoscopic pictures courtesy of Gil Melmed, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Deep Ulcerations
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 4
Endoscopic Severity Predicts Colectomy
Severeendoscopic colitis
Moderateendoscopic colitis
Carbonnel F et al. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:1550.
100
0
Colectomy (%)
Deep/extensive
ulcers
93%
Mucosaldetachment
30%
Largemucosal
abrasions
26%
Well-likeulcers
17%
93% → colectomy93% → colectomy
100
0Superficial
ulcers
77%
Deep butnonextensive
ulcers
8%
23% → colectomy23% → colectomy
Colectomy (%)
Predicators of Poor Response or Surgery• Stool frequency
• >8 or >5 after 3 days IV rx.
• Percentage bloody stools
• Body temperature > 37.5
• Heart rate >90 bpm
• CRP (>25, >45 mg/L)
• Transverse colon > 5 cm
• Low hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL
• Serum albumin
• ESR > 30 mm/h
• Bandemia
• Prolonged flare
• Active infection
• Hospitalization setting
• Severe endoscopic lesions
• Disease duration
Lindgren SC et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;10(10):831-5. Gonzalez-Lama Y et al. Hepatogastroenterol2008;55(86-87):1609-14. Suzuki Y et al Dig Dis Sci 2006;51(11):2031-8. Cacheux W. et al. A,m J Gastroenterol2008;103(3):637-42. Ananthakrishnan AN et al. A, J Gastroenterol 2008;103(11):2789-98.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 5
Management Day 11 2 3
• Check for C difficile
• Abdominal x-ray to rule out dilation
• Complete physical exam for signs or symptoms of DVT, dehydration, sepsis, toxic megacolon
• Pregnancy test if appropriate
• Set patient expectations
• IV steroids for no more than 5 days
• Colorectal surgery consultation
• Patient will be discharged on some form of immune suppression
• IV steroids
• IV fluids if volume depletion but patient can eat if no nausea/ vomiting
• DVT prophylaxis
• No narcotics -if patient having pain suspect toxicity
• Check chemistries, CBC, but also TMPT, PPD, Hep B serologies
Inpatient Medications
•No role for oral 5‐ASA
• IV steroids: 40 mg or 1 mg/kg IV methylprednisolone daily
•No randomized trials comparing different steroid regimens
•Unclear if thiopurine continued or not
•Antibiotics not indicated to treat UC
Often used in toxic settings
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 6
93%78%
53%69% 65% 70%
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Dexa100mg
x3
HC400mg
M-pred40mg
M-pred0.75-1..0
mg/kg
HC 400mg
M-pred64 mg
% R
emis
sion
or
Sub
stan
tial
R
espo
nse
Daily Dose
Outcomes: Severe UC by Day 15
Sood, A et al. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;35(4):328‐31. Panes, J et al. Gastroenterology 2000;119:903‐8.Mantzaris, GJ et al. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001;36:971‐4. Mantzaris, GJ et al. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:43‐6.D’Haens G et al. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1323‐9. Chapman et al. Gut 1986;27:1210‐2
•Travis or Ho Index used to predict likelihood of colectomy
•Consider flex sig to rule out CMV
•Re check C. difficile toxin
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 7
• had an 85% risk of medical failure.
Predictors of IV Steroid Failure
Travis et al, 1996• 85% failure rate on
day 3 if:– >8 BM/d or – CRP>45mg/l
• 60% failure rate on day 7 if:– >3 BM/d or– Blood still visible
• Higher failure rate if: – Severe ulcerations
present on sigmoidoscopy
Over first 3 days Points
Mean # BMs 4–6 1
Mean # BMs 6–8 2
Mean # BMs >9 4
Albumin <3.0 g/dL 1
Colonic dilatation 4
Travis S, et al. Gut. 1996;38:905.Ho GT, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:1079.
Ho et al, 2004
Failure of Medical TherapyScore 0–1 = 11%Score 2–3 = 43%Score ≥4 = 85%
C. difficile Infection
• IBD patients higher risk for infection
•C. diff positive hospitalized UC patients
Longer hospital stay, more aggressive disease 20% colectomy rate
OR 4.7 for death if C. diff positive
•As infection tends to be more severe, treatment with vancomycin recommended at first line
14Berg AM, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jan;19(1):194-204.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 8
Unique Risk Factors for CDI in IBD Patients
• Younger age
• No antibiotic exposure
• Outpatient acquisition
• More commonly seen in UC than Crohn’s colitis
Berg AM, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jan;19(1):194-204.
Pseudomembranes Rarely Seen in IBD Patients
Issa M, Vijayapal A, Graham MB, et al. Impact of Clostridium difficile on inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):345‐51.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 9
CDI‐IBD Patients Have Worse Outcomes• Population based retrospective study based on discharge
diagnosis (2003)
• Primary outcome: in‐hospital mortality
• CDI‐IBD 2804, CDI 44,400, IBD 77,366
• Compared to non IBD CDI patients; IBD patients with CDI had:
2x greater mortality
6x more likely to undergo bowel surgery
3x longer length of stay
3x more likely to require TPN
2x more likely to require blood transfusionsAnanthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG. Excess hospitalization burden associated with Clostridium difficile in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2008 Feb;57(2):205-10
Cytomegalovirus in Severe UC
• Immunosuppressed patients at risk for CMV infection
•Testing can be serologic, histologic
• Serum CMV IgM and IgG
•Biopsy with H+E, immunohistologic stains
•ACG guidelines suggest treatment with gancyclovir and reducing immune suppressing medications*
Kandiel A, Lashner B. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006:101(12):2857-65. Maconi G, et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37(6):418-23.Kornbluth A, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;105(3):501-23.
*No evidence of benefit
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 10
Day 4
Adequate Response
•Continue IV steroids until clinical remission
Formed bowels
No blood
No urgency
•Transition to oral steroids & discharge
Inadequate Response
•Colectomy
Safest
• Infliximab
•Cyclosporine
•Monitor until clinical remission
The CYSIF Study
CsA vs Infliximab in IV Steroid-Refractory UC
Laharie D, et al. Lancet. 2012;380(9857):1909-15.
Response Rates at Day 7
CsA
Pati
ents
(%)
Infliximab
84%
020406080
100 86%
N=111 (55 CsA; 56 infliximab)
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 11
Accelerated induction dosing of infliximab compared with standard dosing in acute severe UC
• Gibson et al, ClinGastroenterol Hepatol 13:330‐335;2014
(Accelerated dosing = 5 mg/kg at median day 0>7>24)
“Real Life”: CSA vs. Infliximab ?
Courtesy of Russ Cohen
Infliximab Cyclosporin
• Outpatient
• Inpatient
• IV steroid responsive
• Already failed/allergic to azathioprine or 6‐MP
• Renal disease, hypertension, seizures, advanced age: ok
• Reliable
• Inpatient only
• IV steroid refractory
• Has not failed / allergic to azathioprine / 6‐MP
• Does not have renal disease, hypertension, seizures, advanced age.
• Must be very very reliable.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 12
•Never together
•Often send patient to surgery instead
• Some Exceptions:
1. Cyclosporin: effective, but then has allergic reaction to azathioprine / 6‐MP (wash out for 48‐72 hours?)
2. Cyclosporin: intolerable side‐effect (wash out for 48‐72 hours)
3. Infliximab: failure / allergic reaction; wash out (variable)
• Don’t forget PCP prophylaxis!
BOTH Cyclosporin and Infliximab?
Switching Therapy & Other Considerations
•Patients who fail a rescue therapy should undergo colectomy
•With infliximab consider fecal loss and re‐dosing (accelerated induction)
• Switching from one rescue therapy to another has only 30% success rate but SAE rate of 20%, with death rate as high as 2%
Maser EA, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(10):1112-6. Leblanc S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(4):771-7.
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 13
Oral tacrolimus
Open label German study 72% remission
at 2 weeks
Open label German study 72% remission
at 2 weeks
RCT vs placebo in Japan 50% at 2
weeks in treatment arm vs 13% placebo
RCT vs placebo in Japan 50% at 2
weeks in treatment arm vs 13% placebo
Other Therapies
Adalimumab
Not studied in hospital setting and not recommended
Not studied in hospital setting and not recommended
Schmidt KJ, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(1):129-3.Ogata H, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(5):803-8.
Tofacitinib
Not studied in hospital setting and
not yet approved
Not studied in hospital setting and
not yet approved
Ulcerative Colitis:Indications for Surgery
• Failure to control severe attacks or toxic megacolon
•Acute complications
•Chronic symptoms despite medical therapy
•Medication side effects without disease control
•Dysplasia or Cancer
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, FACG
2016 ACG/VGS/ODSGNA Regional Postgraduate CourseCopyright American College of Gastroenterology 14
Assessing Causality of Perioperative IBD Medications and Complications: Confounders
• Severity of IBD
• Nutritional status
• Concomitant therapies
• Emergent vs Elective Surgery
• Different pre-operative drug window
• Different procedures
• Different expertise of surgeons
Preparing Patients for Surgery:Loeb’s Laws
•The Golden Rule: Don't do to the patient what you wouldn't like done to yourself.
• If what you are doing is working, keep doing it.
• If what you do is not working, stop (and do something else).