AWIPS

AWIPS

Tim Hopkins

February 25, 2010

AWIPS II Overview and Statusfor HIC Conference

2

AWIPS II Near Term Milestones and Activities

• Software Delivery DR5, 2/15/10• DR6 coming March 1st

• Additional forecaster testing March 5 9th

– Focus on stability, localization and customization and local apps infrastructure

Field Volunteer testers (Lead is Bill Gery)• Eric Thaler WFO BOU• Ken Pomeroy WRH SSD• Kristian Mattarochia WFO RNK• Paul Stanko WFO GUM

• Preliminary Readiness Review, March 10th

• Final TO11 software delivery, March 15th

• System OT&E Readiness Review, March 16th

3

Hardware Refresh Schedule

Activity Status Sched. Cost Issues Risk Deploy Start

Terminal Server & Console (Cyclades) G G G G G 3/15/10

Rack Consolidation G Y G G G Fall, 2010 (on hold)

Modem Replacement (MultiTech) G Y G G G June, 2010

REP Server Refresh (Dell 2950) G G G G G 2/16/10

*DX1/DX2 Refresh (HP DL380) G Y G G G June, 2010 (tied to PV)

NAS Tape Backup Refresh (Tandberg LT04, 1.6TB+1TB ext drive)

G G G Y G July, 2010

*LAN Switch Replacement (Cisco 2960) G Y G G G April, 2010

*LX Workstation Refresh (HPZ600) G Y G G G April, 2010

*Powervault Replacement (Netapp 2020) G Y G G G June, 2010

*DX3/DX4 Replacement (Dell 2950) G Y G G G July, 2010

* AWIPS II OT&E Pre-requisite

No Concern Issues Significant Issue Completed Not Applicable

G Y R B N/A

Green=1, Yellow=2, Red=3 General Status = simple average of all ratings, rounded to nearest integer (.5 rounded up), N/A’s not counted

Legend

4

AWIPS-II Risk MatrixV

ery

Lo

w

L

ow

Mo

de

rate

0 -

20%

20

-40%

40

- 60

%

60

- 80

%

L

IKELIH

OOD

L

IKELIH

OOD

Hig

h

Consequences

Trend Rank/

ID

Ap

pro

ach Risk

1 M Raytheon cannot resolve all FBSO’s by 3/15/10

7 M Government cannot complete all FBSO DR testing by 3/15/10

2 M Regions cannot port critical local apps by 3/15/10

4 M GSD cannot deliver MSAS by 3/15/10

3 M GSD cannot deliver LAPS by 3/15/10

6 M Government cannot complete all gap testing activities by 2/3/10

4

3

2

1

1 2 3 4

5

5

80

- 10

0%

Ver

y H

igh

3

4

1

2

ApproachM – MitigateW – WatchA – AcceptR - Research

Decreasing (Improving)Increasing (Worsening)Unchanged

ApproachM – MitigateW – WatchA – AcceptR - Research

Criticality

Decreasing (Improving)Increasing (Worsening)Unchanged

L x C Trend

Critical

Med

Low

6

7

55

• Final Target: 22

• Final Target Date: 3/15/2010

– Work Weeks Left to Final: 3

– Work Weeks Left to Next Target: 3

• Project Critical Path: Yes

• Gov. Proj. Lead: SEC-Ed Mandel/Ashley Kells

• RTS Proj. Lead: N/A

22 22

14

6

0

10

20

30

Nu

mb

er

of

Lo

ca

l A

pp

s

B/4 System OT&E

Categories

Total Accepted In Progress Complete

• Last Target: N/A• Current Actual: 7 Complete • Next Target: 22 SOTE Complete• Next Target Date: 3/15/10 (Weekly)• Projected Completion Date: TBD• Resource Needs: TBD

• Assuming that if the regions have accepted the app then they have the resources but this is still somewhat uncertain.

• Associated Actions/Notes:• Regions demoted some from critical, so

we are down to 22 now.• SEC is experimenting with assisting on

some

AWIPS-II Local Applications Migration Progress

Critical Local Apps for System OT&E

6

Critical Local Apps MigrationProgress

Site Status Application Name

BOI R Analog14.1 (1270) Migration

BOI R AnalogPoP (1283) Migration

EAX B Bookie's Real-Time Observation Monitor (1886) Migration

WRH Y ClimoPOP (1511) Migration

AJK B copyFile.pl and sendCmd.pl (1665) Migration

WRH Y DiurnalFromModel (1294) Migration

BYZ B email_users.sh (774) Migration

ERH Y erhLAPS (1006) Migration

SST G ldadProductDisseminationSystem

BYZ R MatchObsAll local apps (2163) Migration

BYZ R MatchObsAll

Site Status Application Name

KRF G Meet-Me Notification Software (1829) Migration

PQR B Metar Watch (1895) Migration

STO RL MOSReliabilityScripts (2300) Migration

UNR G NDBC Buoy Monitor (1600) Migration

HNX G obsgrid_qc.tcl (2282) Migration

AMA RL ObsPlot (1979) Migration

WRH Y QPFHelper (1413) Migration

MRX G VWP Plotting and Analysis (1242) Migration

SGX Y WR Sky Tools (1622) Migration

AJK B xmclimate

AJK B xmgraph

Not Started ROM LOE Analysis Complete

In Progress, No problems

In Progress, Issues

In Progress Significant

Issues

Completed

NS RL G Y R B

77

AWIPS-II Software Discrepancies Progress

OPEN Fix Before System OT&E DR’s (FBSO)

• Final Target: Zero (contract exit criteria, Hard)• Final Target Date: 3/15/10 (contract milestone, Hard)

– Work Weeks Left: 3– FBSO Submission Weeks Left: 0– FBSO Submission Rate(10/1->1/22): 55/wk.

• Projected Remaining Submissions: 0– Projected Total FBSO’s Remaining: 631– Projected Fix Rate Needed: 210/wk.– Actual Fix Rate(2/5 -> 2/12) : 86.5/wk. (last:50)

• Project Critical Path: Yes!!• Gov. Proj. Lead: SEC-Ed Mandel/Pete Pickard• RTS Proj. Lead: Andre Tarro/Doug Lawson/Frank

Griffith

483

177

597

252

656

304

656

304

639

382

742

402

729

415

731

443

758

465

631 616

0200400600800

#of

Op

en/F

ixed

F

BS

O's

12/4 12/25 1/8 1/22 2/5Date

Open Raytheon Fixed and Tested

• Projected Completion Date: 3/15/10• Resource Needs: FFP contract task• Associated Actions/Notes:

– 2/5/10 is last day to submit new FBSO’s– Estimated completion date at actual fix

rate, assuming no more FBSO’s after 2/3/10: 4/12/2010 (last: 5/12/2010)

• 631/86.5 = 7.3 (work weeks)

88

AWIPS-II Software Testing Progress

FBSO DR Testing

• Final Target: All Delivered FBSO’s Tested (Govt. Responsibility, Firm)

• Final Target Date: 3/15/10 (contract milestone, Hard)– FBSO Test Work Weeks Left: 3– FBSO Submission Weeks Left: 0– Projected FBSO Test Rate Needed: 56.4/wk.– Actual FBSO Test Rate (2/5 -> 2/12) : 24.5/wk.

• Project Critical Path: Yes• Gov. Proj. Lead: SEC-Ed Mandel/Tom Piper• RTS Proj. Lead: N/A (Govt. Activity)

320

145103

382

145103

402

189129

415303210

134

443536

256159

465536

309201

616536

318208

0200400600800

#of

FB

SO

's

1/4 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12Date

Fixed and Tested By Raytheon Fix Delivered To Govt. Tested by Govt. Closed by Govt.

• Last Target: 29 (tested 27)• Next Target: 109 (Computed, Firm)

– 1/29 DR4 delivery had 233 new FBSO fixes in it

• Projected Completion Date: 3/15/10• Resource Needs: A watch item• Associated Actions/Notes:

– Activity is ramping up quickly

99

AWIPS-II Software Testing Progress

FBSO DR Testing Closure Rate

• If a test fails, the DR gets re-cycled back to Raytheon for resolution and then must be re-delivered and re-tested. This adds workload on both sides and reduces effective fix rate, adding to the likelihood of the #1 risk.

2715848254

284

12476345

145103

4210

189129

60

10

210

13464

12

256

15981

14

309

201

9216

318

208

91

190100200300400

#of F

BSO

's

11/20 12/25 1/15 1/29 2/12Date

Tested Pass (Closed) Fail Incomplete

1010

AWIPS-II Deployment Transition Planning (DTP) Progress

Hardware+Software ArchitectureComponent Progress*

• Final Target: – All 12 Major Pieces of Hardware 100% Finalized

and Tested by Govt. (implied TO11 exit criteria, Firm) = 12 x 100

• Final Target Date: 3/15/2010– Work Weeks Left(wwl): 2

• Project Critical Path: Yes• Gov. Proj. Lead: SEC-Ed Mandel/Jim Williams• RTS Proj. Lead: Andre Tarro• Mitigation: Best effort mitigation is indicated on the below

chart by red and green being of matched percent complete, for any component that is >0% complete. Indication is that 11/11 components are in synch. Excellent!. 1/12 still not defined at all. Very Good.

0%

50%

100%

Ap

pro

xim

ate

%

Co

mp

lete

DX1 DX2 PX1 PX2 DX3 DX4 LX XT NAS CP1 CP2 PV

Hardware Components (10/30/09)

Current Design and Test (Raytheon) Final Design and Test Complete (Raytheon)

Final Design Tested by Govt.

• Projected Completion Date: 3/15/2010• Begin stability testing

• Resource Needs: None• Associated Actions/Notes:

– This is an issue that hinders govt. testing and deployment planning efforts across the board. Govt. has not required it from RTS sooner. RTS says it will be done in January (sometime). See associated risk mitigation.

DX1 – PostGres/Radar svrDX2 – Bup PostGresPX1 – LDM/Rehost appsPX2 – LDM/LDAD procs DX3 – Edex PrimaryDX4 – Edex Client

LX - CaveXT – Text WorkstationNAS – HDF5CP1 – LDM ServerCP2 – LDM BupPV - TBD

Architecture Overview

11

Product Improvement DashboardAWIPS Extended Activities

Activity Status Sched. Cost Issues Risk

AE: NAWIPS Migration Y Y G Y Y

AE: Thin Client Y Y G Y Y

AE: WES Bridge Y Y G Y Y

AE: WES Integration Y Y G Y Y

AE: CHPS Deployment G G G G G

AE: Data Delivery – Phase I Y Y G Y Y

AE: Collaboration – Phase I Y Y G Y Y

No Concern Issues Significant Issue Completed Not Applicable

G Y R B N/A

Green=1, Yellow=2, Red=3 General Status = simple average of all ratings, rounded to nearest integer (.5 rounded up), N/A’s not counted

Legend

12

4

3

2

1

1 2 3 4

5

5

AWIPS-II Extended Risk MatrixV

ery

Lo

w

L

ow

Mo

de

rate

0 -

20%

20

-40%

40

- 60

%

60

- 80

%

L

IKELIH

OOD

L

IKELIH

OOD

Hig

h

Consequences

Trend Rank/

ID

Ap

pro

ach Risk

1 M AWIPS II Infrastructure gaps or changes will adversely affect schedules of WES II bridge, NAWIPS migration, and Thin Client projects

2 M Lack of sufficient AWIPS II documentation, training and support for development organizations and SEC engineering support contractors could impact project schedule

3 R Inability to engage RTS on AWIPS II Extended Projects

4 M Integration and support issues of Government developed code for NAWIPS and Thin Client

5 M Ability of data providers and networks to support AWIPS II data delivery requirements

6 M Security requirements may conflict with Thin Client and Data Delivery requirements

80

- 10

0%

Ver

y H

igh

3

4

12

ApproachM – MitigateW – WatchA – AcceptR - Research

Decreasing (Improving)Increasing (Worsening)Unchanged

ApproachM – MitigateW – WatchA – AcceptR - Research

Criticality

Decreasing (Improving)Increasing (Worsening)Unchanged

L x C Trend

Critical

Med

Low

6

5

13

AWIPS II Extended Milestones

Phase Project Near-Term Targets Target Deployment

Extend AWIPS II to Entire Enterprise

NAWIPS Migration OTE: 2-3Q11 4Q11

Thin Client OSIP G3: 3Q10 1Q12

WES Bridge

WES Integration OSIP G3: 3Q10

2Q11

2Q12

CHPS Deployment OSIP G3: 3Q10 3Q11

Enterprise Enhancements

Data Delivery – IOC

Data Delivery - FOC

OSIP G2: 3Q10 4Q12

FY13

Collaboration – Phase I

Collaboration – Phase II

Collaboration - Phase III

OSIP G2: 3Q10 2Q12

FY13

FY14

Information Generation FOC

FY14

3D Visualization IOC FY14

14

New OS/Hardware BaselineNotional Strategy

• Notional! i.e. no OSIP project yet• One hardware suite to serve needs of RFC’s and NC’s• One hardware suite for WFO’s• Use Red Hat Server products virtualization capabilities to support two

different configurations of RFC/NC hardware suite.• WFO’s would stay with current hardware refresh plan and workstation

version of Red Hat and associated configuration• Result would be

– Retain two hardware baselines (WFO & RFC/NC)– Increase OS baseline to two (RHEL Workstation and Server)– Increase OS/hardware configuration baseline to three

• RFC configuration• NC configuration• WFO configuration

• OSIP Project 07-059 (RFC AWIPS Configuration) should provide input to the above strategy. – Gate 2 is scheduled for April but documentation has not been updated

for some time i.e. uncertain of current and recent past level of activity.

15

NAWIPS Migration Integrated Schedule

Mon 3/15/10