7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
1/16
O R I G I N A L P A P E R
Avalanche risk assessment for mountain roads: a case
study from Iceland
Maria Wastl Johann Stotter Hannes Kleindienst
Received: 24 November 2008 / Accepted: 23 December 2010 / Published online: 6 January 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
Abstract This paper presents an assessment of the avalanche hazard potential and the
resulting risks on mountain roads for a 38.7-km-long section of road no 76 (Siglu-
fjararvegur) in northern Iceland following a regional scale approach developed in the
Alps. The assessment of the individual avalanche death risk proved applicable to distin-
guish areas of avalanche hazard with a risk above the accepted level, which should be
given priority in following detailed investigations and the planning of possible protective
measures, from road sections where the avalanche death risk is low and accepted accordingto international practice. The cumulative individual and collective avalanche death risks in
the investigated road section provide a comparable measure for assessing the avalanche
hazard both within the Icelandic public road network and on an international scale. The
case study on road no 76 in northern Iceland shows that a standardised regional scale risk-
based approach is practical to determine, analyse and assess the avalanche hazard situation
on mountain roads in Iceland and guarantees comprehensible, reproducible and compa-
rable results as a basis for a sustainable planning of measures.
Keywords Risk assessment Avalanche hazard Mountain roads Iceland
M. Wastl (&)Department of Geography, Institute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Koblenz University,Universitatsstrae 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germanye-mail: [email protected]
URL: http://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/koblenz/fb3/ifin/geographie
J. StotterInstitute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
H. KleindienstGRID-IT Gesellschaft fur angewandte Geoinformatik mbH, Technikerstrae 21a,6020 Innsbruck, Austria
123
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9703-6
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
2/16
1 Background and aim of the investigation
While the management of avalanche hazards in settlements follows operational stand-
ardised procedures in Iceland (see e.g. Arnalds et al. 2004; Johannesson 2004; Jonasson
et al. 1999; Jonsson 2002; http://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/), there are no comparableapproaches for a systematic survey and assessment of the avalanche hazard situation and a
sustainable planning of measures for roads. This investigation presents a regional scale
assessment of the avalanche hazard potential and its related risks on mountain roads for a
case study in northern Iceland.
The total length of the public road network in Iceland is ca. 13,000 km (http://www.
vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%
BDsing_01-03-2010.pdf), mostly low-volume roads outside built-up areas. About
10,500 km of these roads are open all year. Substantial parts of the Icelandic public road
network e.g. in central northern Iceland, north-western and eastern Iceland lie in alpine
mountain areas and are affected by avalanches. Though the resulting road maintenancecosts are considerable, there is no general overview of the avalanche hazard situation up to
now. (Fig. 1)
The aim of the investigation is to describe and assess the generalised avalanche hazard
situation and its related risks on roads outside built-up areas following a regional scale
approach.
The approach is calibrated by a detailed investigation into the 38.7-km-long section of
road no 76 (Siglufjararvegur) from Siglufjorur to Straumnes in northern Iceland (Fig. 2).
The results are documented in maps indicating the avalanche hazard potential for specific
road sections, a report with the risk assessment and recommendations and an informationsystem, all together providing a basis for detailed planning.
To guarantee that investigations following the developed approach are feasible and
affordable for all rural roads in Iceland and reduce time-consuming and expensive field-
work to a minimum, the investigation needs to be mainly based on already existing data
most of which are available at the Icelandic Road Administration (Vegagerin), the Ice-
landic Meteorological Office (Veurstofa Islands) and the National Land Survey of Iceland
(Landmlingar Islands).
Fig. 1 Road no 76 in northern Iceland
466 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
http://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
3/16
This paper describes the practical application of a regional scale risk-based avalanche
hazard assessment for mountain roads in Iceland meeting these preconditions.
2 Investigated road section
Road no 76 is classified as a highway and tarred. The mean traffic densities along the
investigated section of the road are between ca. 250 and 370 cars per day in the annual
average, with ca. 400540 cars per day during the summer (June to September) and ca.
150270 cars per day during the winter months (December to March), based on the census
from 2008 (http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/
Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdf).
Figure 2 shows the investigated section of road no 76. For the assessment of the ava-
lanche hazard situation, it was divided into six subsections (road sections 911941 in the
map).
Fig. 2 Investigated section of road no 76 from Siglufjorur to Straumnes. The orange line marks theboundary of the catchments of the streams crossing the road, the blue dots indicate the meteorologicalstations used in this investigation
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 467
123
http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdf7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
4/16
3 Avalanche hazard assessment
3.1 Method
Due to the specifications stated in the objectives (see Sect. 1) and the requirements of theregional scale and the resulting detail in the determination of areas affected by avalanche
hazards, an approach was adopted which had been developed in the Eastern Alps in recent
years (see http://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdf; http://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.
gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdf). In addi-
tion to the natural hazard zone maps on the planning level with scales C1:10,000, a
preceding regional scale overview level with scales B1:25,000 has been introduced in
Austria, Germany and Italy. This approach aims at increasing the efficiency and effec-
tiveness in natural hazard management by maximising the use of existing data (maps,
reports, scientific investigations, etc.) and reducing time-consuming and expensive field-
work to a minimum. Models which are specially adapted to the requirements of a regionalscale are applied to provide comprehensible, reproducible and comparable results, which
help to assign priorities in the planning of measures.
3.2 Data bases
To guarantee that the developed approach can be applied to all classified roads in Iceland,
the investigation was mainly based on already existing data most of which are available at
the offices of
the Icelandic Road Administration, i.e.(1) digital colour orthophotos with a resolution of 0.5 m and
(2) digital 5 m contour lines
for the areas around the road.
The mosaic of the digital colour orthophotos provides the background for 3D-views of
the investigated road sections and the detailed maps of the results (see Sect. 3.3).
the Icelandic Meteorological Office, i.e.
meteorological data of stations in or close to the investigation area: Sauanesviti
(66
11
0
N, 18
57
0
W, 30 m a.s.l.), Skeisfoss (66
00
0
N, 19
01
0
W, 84 m a.s.l.) andSiglunes (66120N, 18510W, 8 m a.s.l.) (see Fig. 2).
the National Land Survey of Iceland, i.e.
(1) topographic maps Iceland-Island 1:50,000 and
(2) black and white aerial photographs.
Stereo pairs of these aerial photographs provided the basis for mapping potential
starting areas of avalanches above the investigated section of road no 76 before going into
the field (see Sect. 3.3).
Orthophotos of a resolution of 1.0 m were produced from the black and white aerial
photographs by means of the software PCI OrthoEngine.
For this investigation, a digital terrain model (DTM) was produced using ARC-GIS. It is
based on the digitised contour lines (interval 20 m) and geodetic points of the 1:50,000
maps for the whole investigation area and the digital 5-m contour lines provided by the
Icelandic Road Administration for parts of the area along the investigated section of road
no 76. The elevation data of the 5-m contours were used where available. This improved
468 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
http://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdf7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
5/16
DTM provided the basis for modelling the investigated processes, which guarantees a high
quality of the modelling results for the areas around the road.
In addition, these data studies on the general geological background (Gumundsson
et al. 2001; Hafliason 1982) as well as previously made reports on the investigated road
section (Jarfristofa AGVST, BAH Ragjof 1999; Smundsson et al. 2004) wereavailable for this assessment. The latter, however, concentrate on an area of active sagging
and do not provide information on the avalanche hazard situation.
3.3 Applied model
Objective of the modelling part of the investigation was the determination and outline of
areas affected by avalanche processes for the section of road no 76 from Siglufjorur to
Straumnes.
Potential starting areas of avalanches were mapped based on stereo pairs of the aerial
photographs (see Sect. 3.2) for the areas above the road. These maps were checked andcompleted in the field. Areas of active avalanche processes could be identified by damage
to the vegetation, missing sods or eroded patches of soil. In some cases, remains of snow or
debris left by avalanches could be found. Boulders deposited by the avalanches were
mapped as indicators for the extents of the accumulation areas. Additional information on
the run-out distance was provided by ruins of farm buildings which had been destroyed by
an avalanche (Engidalur). The ground-truthed maps were digitised and transferred to a GIS
dataset.
The starting areas were checked and partly expanded by means of a disposition model
using functionalities of geographical information systems. On the regional scale, the mostimportant criterion for the determination of the starting areas is the slope of the terrain.
Potential starting lines of avalanches are defined as the upper boundaries of areas with
slopes between 28 and 50.
The resulting dataset of potential avalanche starting areas was the basis for modelling
the accumulation areas using the model GRID-aval.
The avalanche model GRID-aval (Grid-based Trajectory Avalanche Model) is a two-
dimensional model to calculate the run-out distance of flow avalanches on a regional scale
(see Stotter et al. 2006). It is based on the approach of Lied and Bakkehi ( 1980) and
determines the maximum run-out distance in a topographic-statistical way. The model
describes the run-out distance of an avalanche by means of an angle a which is a functionof the angle between the starting point and the point at which the avalanche track reaches
an angle of 10.
The model calculates the run-out distance of an avalanche starting from a given line
by means of an estimated slope with the angle a. This estimated slope describes the loss
of energy of the avalanche during the flow process. Thus, the difference between the real
slope of the terrain surface and the estimated slope gives the corresponding kinetic
energy, which, in a following step, can be used as input data for the modelling of the
flow paths. The angle a is determined on the basis of a statistical analysis of known
avalanche events.For this assessment, a was derived from the statistical analysis of 45 avalanche events
in Iceland by Johannesson (1998).This investigation gives a mean value for a of 23.62
with a standard deviation of 3.19 (a = 23.62, r = 3.19, n = 45). The minimum value
for a in the Siglufjorur area (n = 7) is 21. On this basis, an estimated slope of 23.62
(mean) and a lower limit of 20.43 (mean minus one standard deviation) were used in
the calculations.
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 469
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
6/16
The avalanche track is determined by means of a vector-orientated model on the basis of
orientation and slope data from the digital terrain model. The influence of topography on
the calculated avalanche tracks is determined by a weighting factor (topoweight). A
topoweight value of 1 stands for a motion close to that of a ball while a very high value
represents the motion characteristics of water. A further model parameter (widening)defines the lateral extension of the avalanche from the calculated tracks. In model calcu-
lations made so far, topoweight values between 5 and 7 and a widening of 0.005 have given
good results. The output of this modelling is a sequence of points in three-dimensional
coordinates.
The modelled avalanche accumulation areas were printed out against the background of
the topographic maps and the colour orthophotos (see Sect. 3.2) and compared with the
extents of the avalanche accumulation areas mapped in the field. These checked and
corrected data provided the basis for assessing the avalanche hazard for the investigated
road section.
Based on the findings in the field and the modelling results, two avalanche hazard levelsare distinguished:
(1) Avalanche hazard level 1 is based on an estimated slope of 23.62, which is the
statistical mean of the analysis of 45 avalanche events in Iceland by Johannesson
(1998).
Areas of avalanche hazard level 1 can be reached by avalanches under unfavourable
conditions.
(2) Avalanche hazard level 2 is based on an estimated slope of 20.43, which is the mean
minus one standard deviation in the analysis by Johannesson (1998), and indicatesareas that can be reached by avalanches under extremely unfavourable conditions
(worst case assumption).
There are, however, no records of avalanches for the investigated road which could
provide empirical evidence for the assumptions on these avalanche hazard levels.
Figure 3 shows an example of the modelled avalanche tracks and the extent of the
accumulation areas, which are the outer boundaries of all cells reached by the avalanche
tracks, for avalanche hazard levels 1 and 2, respectively.
While the validation of run-out distances is not possible due to the limitations of the
available data, the avalanche hazard levels reflect the topographic situation of the affectedroad sections, where the slopes with the avalanche tracks extend down to the coastline (see
Fig. 1). Thus, all modelled avalanche tracks that reach or cross the road cause an avalanche
hazard in these areas irrespective of their exact run-out distances.
3.4 Results
In the investigated part of road no 76 between Siglufjorur and Straumnes, there are 18
areas of avalanche hazard level 1 (see Table 1) and 25 areas of avalanche hazard level 2
(see Table 2).
The areas of avalanche hazard level 1 lie between Siglufjorur and km 13.32, i.e. in
road sections 911, 912 and 921 (see Fig. 2). Altogether, 6.81 km of these northern three
sections can be reached by avalanches under unfavourable conditions (Figs. 4, 5, 6).
Especially, road sections 911 and 912 are almost entirely areas of avalanche hazard level 1
with 14 avalanche tracks, some of which very broad, crossing this part of the road.
470 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
7/16
Fig. 3 Modelled avalanche tracks and accumulation areas for avalanche hazard levels 1 (dark blue) and 2(light blue) (Stotter et al. 2006)
Table 1 Areas of avalanchehazard level 1 on road no 76 fromSiglufjorur to Straumnes
The total length of the areas ofavalanche hazard level 1 is6.81 km
No Road km fromSiglufjorur
1 00.39
2 0.881.08
3 1.391.46
4 1.502.00
5 2.082.17
6 3.194.43
7 4.795.03
8 5.095.29
9 5.395.66
10 5.715.73
11 5.887.32
12 7.457.48
13 7.587.99
14 8.539.20
15 9.549.82
16 11.0911.41
17 12.2212.39
18 13.0513.32
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 471
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
8/16
The areas of avalanche hazard level 1 in section 921 are limited to four comparativelyshort parts of the road.
West of km 13.32 the slopes along road no 76 are less steep and less high. There are
steep and high slopes in road section 941 (see Fig. 2). These are, however, so far away
from the road that the modelled accumulation areas for avalanche hazard level 1 of the four
potential avalanches in this section do not reach the road (see Fig. 7).
Table 2 Areas of avalanchehazard level 2 on road no 76 fromSiglufjorur to Straumnes
The total length of the areas ofavalanche hazard level 2 is8.99 km
No Road km fromSiglufjorur
1 00.42
2 0.881.083 1.382.17
4 3.174.54
5 4.695.06
6 5.095.30
7 5.395.66
8 5.715.73
9 5.867.38
10 7.438.03
11 8.529.23
12 9.509.82
13 11.0811.44
14 11.9612.15
15 12.2112.46
16 13.0313.35
17 13.4513.52
18 13.6113.63
19 13.7713.83
20 13.9514.05
21 14.1014.18
22 14.2114.24
23 31.9932.66
24 35.7435.76
25 35.8335.85
Fig. 4 Areas of avalanchehazard for avalanche hazard
levels 1 (dark blue) and 2 (lightblue) in road section 911: km03.2Siglufjorur to thenorthernmost point of road no 76
472 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
9/16
The modelled accumulation areas of avalanches for avalanche hazard level 2 are gen-erally larger than those of avalanche hazard level 1. The areas of avalanche hazard level 2
thus usually form a band around the areas of avalanche hazard level 1 (see Fig. 3).
For road sections 911, 912 and 921, this means that 8.28 km of the road can be reached
by avalanches under extremely unfavourable conditions (worst case assumption). While in
road sections 911 and 912 with their extensive areas of avalanche hazard level 1, there are
only small further areas of avalanche hazard level 2, ten additional avalanches reach the
road in section 921 under the conditions of avalanche hazard level 2. The total extent of the
areas of avalanche hazard level 2 in this road section remains however limited.
Three further areas of avalanche hazard level 2 lie in road section 941 (Fig. 7).
4 Risk assessment
The assessment of the avalanche risk for the investigated section of road no 76 is based on
investigations by Wilhelm (1997, 1998, 1999) in the Alps. This approach has been applied
Fig. 5 Areas of avalanche hazard for avalanche hazard levels 1 (dark blue) and 2 (light blue) in roadsection 912: km 3.29.5northernmost point of road no 76 to Skrinavk
Fig. 6 Areas of avalanche hazard for avalanche hazard levels 1 (dark blue) and 2 (light blue) in roadsection 921: km 9.518.7Skrinavk to south of Hraun
Fig. 7 Areas of avalanche hazard (avalanche hazard level 2) in road section 941: km 31.138.7pipe 510to road to Straumnes
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 473
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
10/16
e.g. to high alpine pass roads in Switzerland (Margreth et al. 2003), to mountain roads in
Italy (Zischg et al. 2004, 2005) and Austria (Gufler 2007; Huttenlau 2004) and to roads in
Norway (Kristensen et al. 2003). For the study on road no 76 between Siglufjorur and
Straumnes, it was adapted to comply with the data availability of the regional scale.
According to this approach, there is a distinction between (1) the individual risk and thecollective risk for the society for each area of avalanche hazard and (2) the cumulative
individual and collective risks for the investigated road section.
The individual death risk (1.1), collective death risk (1.2), cumulative individual death
risk (2.1) and cumulative collective death risk (2.2) can be determined by the following
equations:
rind i 1
Ti
gi zivi 24h
k 1:1
rcol i
1
Ti
gi WDT
vi 24h b k 1:
2
rind sum Xn
i1
rind i zi
24hXn
i1
gi
Ti vi k 2:1
rcol sum Xn
i1
rcol i WDT b
24hXn
i1
gi
Ti vi k 2:2
with
rind_i for individual death risk for avalanche hazard area i [1/years],rcol_i for collective death risk for avalanche hazard area i [deaths/year],
rind_sum for cumulative individual death risk for n areas of avalanche hazard [1/
years],
rcol_sum for cumulative collective death risk for n areas of avalanche hazard
[deaths/year],
Ti for mean return period of the avalanche [years],
gi for width of the area of avalanche hazard [km],
zi for number of passages per day,
vi for mean velocity in the investigated road section [km/h],
k for mean death rate in cars involved in avalanches,WDT for average daily winter traffic [cars],
for degree of occupancy [persons/car] and
i = 1, 2,,n areas of avalanche hazard
As the input data required for these equations are only partly available for the inves-
tigated section of road no 76, the following assumptions are made for the risk assessment.
Based on the census from 2008 (http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_
thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_
2008.pdf), an average traffic density (WDT) of 270 cars is used for road no 76 between
Siglufjorur and the tunnel (see Fig. 4) during the winter months and a WDT of 150 carsfor the section of the road from the tunnel to Straumnes. The number of passages (zi) is
assumed to be one for the areas of avalanche hazard from the northern end of the tunnel to
Straumnes, and 1.75 between Siglufjorur and the southern end of the tunnel as part of the
cars moving in this section of the road reflect local traffic from Siglufjorur. There are no
474 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdf7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
11/16
data on the mean velocity (vi) and degree of occupancy () of the cars. For this assessment,
the former is estimated to be 60 km/h and the latter two persons/car.
Data on the death rate in cars hit by avalanches (k) are not available in Iceland.
According to the statistical analyses of avalanche accidents on roads in Switzerland by
Wilhelm (1999), 18% of the people who are hit by avalanches in their cars die. For moreremote areas with unfavourable topographic characteristics in Norway, Kristensen et al.
(2003) assume a death rate of 40% for avalanche accidents due to longer rescue times. On
road no 76, the distance between the settlements of Siglufjorur and Hofsos from where
rescue operations could start is about 60 km. Therefore, long rescue times should not have
a particular effect on the death rate in the investigated section of this road, and a death rate
of 18% as determined by Wilhelm (1999) is used in the assessment of the avalanche risk.
The length of the road sections affected by avalanches (gi) is derived from the modelled
areas of avalanche hazard (see Sect. 3.4).
The most difficult assumption concerns the mean return period (Ti) of the avalanches as
avalanche inventories are not available. Against this background, three groups of returnperiods are distinguished on the basis of the reconstructed areas of avalanche hazard (see
Sect. 3.3):
(1) Avalanches with a long return period (Ti = 100)
These are avalanches which reach the road only under extremely unfavourable condi-
tions as defined for avalanche hazard level 2 (see Sect. 3.3).
(2) Avalanches with a short return period (Ti = 10)
These are avalanches for which the reconstructed areas of avalanche hazard level 1 (seeSect. 3.3) reach far beyond the road and which thus come down to the road even in the case
of relatively small events.
(3) Avalanches with a medium return period (Ti = 30)
These are avalanches for which the reconstructed areas of avalanche hazard level 1 (see
Sect. 3.3) reach only little beyond the road and which thus only seldom come down to the
road.
The assessment of the individual death riskrind_i [1/years] for each area of avalanche
hazard on road no 76 from Siglufjorur to Straumnes identifies three areas of ava-
lanche hazard with an rind_i greater than 1 9 10-5 (orange colouring in Table 3).
These sections should be given priority for following detailed investigations and the
planning of possible protective measures. Twelve areas of avalanche hazard have an
rind_i between 1 9 10-5 and 1 9 10-6 (yellow colouring in Table 3), while in the
rest of the areas of avalanche hazard the rind_i is less than 1 9 10-6.
The results in Table 3 show that both the individual death risk rind_i [1/years] and the
collective death riskrcol_i [deaths/year] are very sensitive to the lengths of the road sections
in the areas of avalanche hazard. In the cases with an rind_i greater than 1 9 10-6 the
modelled areas of avalanche hazard are often very wide and thus affect long sections of the
road. If it is assumed, however, that not all avalanche events reach the maximum possible
extent the result looks different. For an event reaching half of the maximum possible
modelled width the rind_i remains below 1 9 10-5 everywhere in the investigated road
section and exceeds 1 9 10-6 in eleven areas of avalanche hazard altogether.
The cumulative individual death riskrind_sum [1/years] for all areas of avalanche hazard
on road no 76 between Siglufjorur and Straumnes, under the assumptions stated above
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 475
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
12/16
and for the case that no measures of avalanche prevention or control or temporary closing
of the road are taken, is 9.314 9 10-5. The cumulative collective death risk rcol_sum[deaths/year] for the investigated road section is 0.0282, or one avalanche death in
36 years.
Table 3 Individual death risk rind_i [1/years], collective death risk rcol_i [deaths/year], cumulative indi-vidual death riskrind_sum [1/years] and cumulative collective death riskrcol_sum [deaths/year] for road no 76from Siglufjorur to Straumnes with gi for width of the area of avalanche hazard [km], Ti for mean returnperiod of the avalanche [years], zi for number of passages per day, vi for mean velocity in the investigatedroad section [km/h], k for mean death rate in cars involved in avalanches, WDT for average daily winter
traffic [cars] and for degree of occupancy [persons/car]
Road km gi
[km]Ti
[years]zi vi
[km/h] WDT
[cars]
[persons/car]rind_i
[1/years]rcol_i
[deaths/year]0.00-0.39 0.39 10 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000853 0,00263250
0.39-0.42 0.03 100 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000007 0,00002025
0.88-1.08 0.20 10 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000438 0,00135000
1.38-1.39 0.01 100 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000002 0,00000675
1.39-1.46 0.07 10 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000153 0,00047250
1.46-1.50 0.04 100 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000009 0,00002700
1.50-2.00 0.50 10 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00001094 0,00337500
2.00-2.08 0.08 100 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000018 0,00005400
2.08-2.17 0.09 10 1.75 60 0.18 270 2 0,00000197 0,00060750
3.17-3.19 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
3.19-4.43 1.24 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00001550 0,00465000
4.43-4.54 0.11 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000014 0,000041254.69-4.79 0.10 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000013 0,00003750
4.79-5.03 0.24 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000300 0,00090000
5.03-5.06 0.03 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000004 0,00001125
5.09-5.29 0.20 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000250 0,00075000
5.29-5.30 0.01 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000001 0,00000375
5.39-5.66 0.27 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000338 0,00101250
5.71-5.73 0.02 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000025 0,00007500
5.86-5.88 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
5.88-7.32 1.44 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00001800 0,00540000
7.32-7.38 0.06 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000008 0,00002250
7.43-7.45 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
7.45-7.48 0.03 30 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000013 0,00003750
7.48.7.58 0.10 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000013 0,00003750
7.58-7.99 0.41 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000513 0,00153750
7.99-8.03 0.04 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000005 0,00001500
8.52-8.53 0.01 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000001 0,00000375
8.53-9.20 0.67 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000838 0,00251250
9.20-9.23 0.03 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000004 0,00001125
9.50-9.54 0.04 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000005 0,00001500
9.54-9.82 0.28 10 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000350 0,00105000
11.08-11.09 0.01 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000001 0,00000375
11.09-11.41 0.32 30 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000133 0,00040000
11.41-11.44 0.03 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000004 0,00001125
11.96-12.15 0.19 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000024 0,00007125
12.21-12.22 0.01 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000001 0,00000375
12.22-12.39 0.17 30 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000071 0,00021250
12.39-12.46 0.07 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000009 0,00002625
13.03-13.05 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
13.05-13.32 0.27 30 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000113 0,00033750
13.32-13.35 0.03 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000004 0,00001125
13.45-13.52 0.07 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000009 0,00002625
13.61-13.63 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
13.77-13.83 0.06 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000008 0,0000225013.95-14.05 0.10 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000013 0,00003750
14.10-14.18 0.08 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000010 0,00003000
14.21-14.24 0.03 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000004 0,00001125
31.99-32.66 0.67 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000084 0,00025125
35.74-35.76 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
35.83-35.85 0.02 100 1 60 0.18 150 2 0,00000003 0,00000750
rind_sum[1/years]/rcol_sum[deaths/year]
0,00009314
0,02817800
Areas of avalanche hazard with an rind_i greater than 1 9 10-5 are marked in orange, those with an rind_i
between 1 9 10-5 and 1 9 10-6 in yellow
476 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
13/16
This cumulative individual death risk is one order of magnitude less than the value
determined for the road over the Fluela Pass in the Swiss Alps for the state without safety
measures by Margreth et al. (2003) (see the comparison of the cumulative individual death
risk and the cumulative collective death risk on road no 76 between Siglufjorur and
Straumnes with those on roads in the Alps in Table 4). It is also comparable to or less thanthe cumulative individual death risks found e.g. by Huttenlau (2004) and Gufler (2007) for
roads in inner Stubai and inner Oetz Valley in Austria, which include the risk reduction by
permanent measures, or by Zischg et al. (2005) for the Sulden road in Italy. The cumulative
collective death risk for the investigated section of road 76 is very low compared to
mountain roads in the Alps.
5 Conclusions
According to Wilhelm (1999), the accepted individual avalanche death risk rind_i [1/years]for the user of a public road is\1 9 10-5. Against this background, the assessment of the
individual death risk for each area of avalanche hazard on road no 76 from Siglufjorur to
Straumnes can be used to distinguish areas of avalanche hazard with a risk level above the
critical value, which should be given priority for following detailed investigations and the
planning of possible protective measures, from road sections where the avalanche death
risk is low and accepted based on international practice (see Table 3). The calculated risks
for the investigated section of road no 76 can further be reduced by measures like tem-
porary closing of parts of the road. This requires, however, a systematic monitoring of the
development of the avalanche hazard situation along the road.The cumulative individual and collective avalanche death risks in the investigated road
section, on the other hand, provide a reproducible and comparable measure for assessing
the avalanche hazard situation and the related risks both within the Icelandic public road
network and on an international scale (see Table 4). In this context, it is interesting to note
that the cumulative individual avalanche death riskrind_sum [1/year] determined for road no
76 between Siglufjorur and Straumnes of 9.314 9 10-5 is equal to the average traffic
mortality rate in Iceland in the last 10 years, i.e. 9 9 10-5 (http://www.us.is/id/4219).
The investigation into the avalanche hazard situation and the related risks on road no 76
between Siglufjorur and Straumnes in northern Iceland shows that a standardised regional
scale risk-based approach is practical to determine, analyse and assess the avalanchehazard situation on mountain roads in Iceland and guarantees comprehensible, reproduc-
ible and comparable results, which help to assign priorities in following detailed investi-
gations and the planning of measures.
For the natural hazard management, the results of this assessment need to be combined
with road data (e.g. current and expected traffic volume for various timescales, road
clearing and maintenance costs for problematic road sections). This allows cost benefit
analyses as a basis for decisions on protective measures. To meet these requirements, an
Internet Road Information System was developed (see Stotter et al. 2006).
In the last decades, Iceland used a lot of money to improve the public road network andthe accessibility of remote communities during the winter (see http://www.
vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/) often by building tunnels in
road sections with a high avalanche hazard potential (http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/
jardgong/jardgvegakerf/; http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/;
http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/). This was part of a policy to
provide an equally high level of infrastructure in all parts of the country and thus work
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 477
123
http://www.us.is/id/4219http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.us.is/id/42197/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
14/16
against the rural exodus. As a consequence of the current financial crisis in Iceland, public
spending on the road network has been cut back considerably and will be so for theforeseeable future. Against this background, an approach as it is presented in this paper can
become even more important both as a basis for a sustainable planning of measures and for
the communication of risk to the public.
Acknowledgments This paper is based on a study for the Icelandic Road Administration made at thealpsCentre for natural hazard and risk management GmbH in Innsbruck in cooperation with Lnuhonnunconsulting engineers in Reykjavk. We thank the Icelandic Road Administration and the Icelandic Meteo-rological Office for the provision of data and Dr. Halldor G. Petursson at the Icelandic Institute of NaturalHistory in Akureyri for useful information on the investigated road section. We also thank the reviewers fortheir constructive comments on the paper.
References
Arnalds , Jonasson K, Sigursson S (2004) Avalanche hazard zoning in Iceland based on individual risk.Ann Glaciol 38:285290
Table 4 Comparison of the cumulative individual death risk rind_sum [1/years] and the cumulative col-lective death risk rcol_sum [deaths/year] on road no 76 between Siglufjorur and Straumnes with valuesdetermined for roads in the Alps
Investigated road section rind_sum [1/years] rcol_sum
[deaths/year]
Road no 76 between Siglufjorur andStraumnes, northern Iceland (38.7 km, 25avalanche tracks, 9 km areas of avalanchehazard), without safety measures (this paper)
9.314 9 10-5 0.0282
Road over the Fluela Pass, Switzerland(19.3 km, 47 avalanche tracks, endangeredroad length 10.1 km), without safety measures(Margreth et al. 2003)
8.7 9 10-4 0.70
Road from Ranalt to the terminal of the StubaierGletscherbahn, inner Stubai Valley, Tyrol,Austria (7.24 km, 16 avalanche tracks), withpermanent measures (Huttenlau 2004)
3.65.4 9 10-5 0.19860.4252
Road from Zwieselstein to Obergurgl, innerOetz Valley, Tyrol, Austria (10 km, 10avalanche tracks), with permanent measures(Gufler 2007)
1.221 9 10-4 1.100
Road from Zwieselstein to Vent, inner OetzValley, Tyrol, Austria (13 km, 21 avalanchetracks), with permanent measures (Gufler2007)
4.523 9 10-4 2.378
Sulden road between Prad and Sulden, OrtlesAlps, Southern Tyrol, Italy (summer road,20 km, 22 avalanche tracks), without safetymeasures (Zischg et al. 2005)
1.16 9 10-4 0.113
Sulden road between Prad and Sulden, OrtlesAlps, Southern Tyrol, Italy (winter road,20 km, 17 avalanche tracks), without safetymeasures (Zischg et al. 2005)
0.0798
478 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
123
7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
15/16
Johannesson T (1998) Icelandic avalanche runout models compared with topographical models used in othercountries. In: Hestnes E (ed) 25 years of snow avalanche research, vol 203. NGI Publ, Oslo, pp 4352
Johannesson T (2004) Greining a tni snjofloa sambandi vi takmorkun a notkun husa a vetrarlagi. URToJ200407, Veurstofa Islands, Reykjavk
Jonasson K, Sigursson S, Arnalds (1999) Estimation of avalanche risk. VIR99001UR01, Veurstofa
Islands, ReykjavkJonsson T (2002) Httumat og hlutverk Veurstofunnar ljosi httumatsramma Aljoaveurfristof-
nunarinnar. G02021 VIUR11, Veurstofa Islands, ReykjavkKristensen K, Harbitz CB, Harbitz A (2003) Road traffic and avalanchesmethods for risk evaluation and
risk management. Surv Geophys 24:603616Lied K, Bakkehi S (1980) Empirical calculations of snow-avalanche run-out distance based on topo-
graphical parameters. J Glaciol 26:165177Margreth S, Stoffel L, Wilhelm C (2003) Winter opening of high alpine pass roadsanalysis and case
studies from the Swiss Alps. Cold Reg Sci Tech 37:467482Stotter J, Wastl M, Schoberl F, Lippert J, Sigorsson H, Kleindienst H (2006) GIS-based regional scale
assessment of the natural hazard potential for roadscase study road no 76 from Siglufjorur toStraumnes, Iceland. In: Strobl J, Roth C (eds) GIS und Sicherheitsmanagement. Wichmann, Heidel-
berg, pp 97106Wilhelm C (1997) Wirtschaftlichkeit im Lawinenschutz. Methodik und Erhebungen zur Beurteilung von
Schutzmassnahmen mittels quantitativer Risikoanalyse und okonomischer Bewertung. Mitt EidgenossInst Schnee- und Lawinenforsch 54, Davos
Wilhelm C (1998) Quantitative risk analysis for evaluation of avalanche protection projects. NGI Publ203:288293 Oslo
Wilhelm C (1999) Kosten-Wirksamkeit von Lawinenschutzmassnahmen an Verkehrsachsen. Vorgehen,Beispiele und Grundlagen der Projektevaluation. Bundesamt fur Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (ed)Vollzug Umwelt, Praxishilfe, Bern
Zischg A, Fuchs S, Stotter J (2004) Uncertainties and fuzziness in analysing risk related to natural hazardsa case study in the Ortles Alps, South Tyrol, Italy. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Risk Analysis IV, ManagementInformation Systems 9, Southampton, pp 523532
Zischg A, Fuchs S, Keiler M, Stotter J (2005) Temporal variability of damage potential on roads as aconceptual contribution towards a short-term avalanche risk simulation. Nat Haz Earth Sys Sci5:235242
Online documents
http://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdfAccessed 17 May 2010http://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-
06-04-og.pdf Accessed 17 May 2010http://www.us.is/id/4219 Accessed 17 May 2010http://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/Accessed 17 May 2010
http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/17 May 2010http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/Accessed 17 May 2010http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/Accessed 17 May 2010http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%
A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdf Accessed 17 May 2010http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_
01-03-2010.pdfAccessed 17 May 2010http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/Accessed 17 May 2010
Unpublished reports and diploma theses
Gumundsson A, Fahrnberger W, Hallsteinsson H (2001) SiglufjorurOlafsfjorur. Veggong umHeinsfjor. Yfirlit yfir jarfri Trollaskaga og astur til jargangagerar. Jarfristofan ehf.Unni fyrir Vegagerina
Gufler B (2007) Vergleichende Beurteilung des Lawinenrisikos auf den Verkehrswegen des hinteren Otz-talsUberlegungen zur Schulrelevanz. Diploma thesis, Institute of Geography, University ofInnsbruck
Hafliason H (1982) Jarfriskyrsla vegna jarsigs a Almenningum vi Siglufjor
Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480 479
123
http://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.us.is/id/4219http://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/jardgong/jardgvegakerf/http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/VegskraLysing/$file/Vegaskr%C3%A1_lei%C3%B0arl%C3%BDsing_01-03-2010.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/umferd_thjod_2008_skyrsla/$file/Umfer%C3%B0_%C3%A1_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegum_2008.pdfhttp://www.vegagerdin.is/upplysingar-og-utgafa/aaetlanir/vegaaetlun/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/oshlidargong/http://www.vegagerdin.is/storframkvaemdir/hedinsfjardargong/http://www.vedur.is/ofanflod/log/http://www.us.is/id/4219http://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/www.tirol.gv.at/themen/umwelt/wald/schutzwald/downloads/endber-kurzfass-06-04-og.pdfhttp://bfw.ac.at/iym/pdf/ziegner.pdf7/29/2019 Avalanse Irlanda
16/16
Huttenlau M (2004) Risikoanalyse im Hinteren StubaitalTirol. Gefahrenprozess Lawine. Analyse desindividuellen und kollektiven Todesfallrisikos auf der Zufahrtsstrae zur Talstation und Analyse desSchutzdefizits im Bereich des Talstation der Stubaier Gletscherbahn. Diploma thesis, Institute ofGeography, University of Innsbruck
Jarfristofa AGVST, BAH Ragjof (1999) Greinarger um aurskriu ur Kongsnefi Fljotum
Smundsson , Petursson HG et al. (2004) Kortlagning a sgi a Siglufjararvegi um Almenninga.Afangaskyrsla
480 Nat Hazards (2011) 56:465480
1