AUTHORS: GUILLERMO CAJAMARCA P. DARÍO GUERRERO SOLANO ADVISORS: DIRECTOR : Lcdo. Miguel Ponce, Msc. CO-DIRECTOR: Lcdo. MARCOS V. MORALES OCTOBER 2009 QUITO - ECUADOR DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH PROGRAM DISTANCE LEARNING EDUCATION ARMY POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
48
Embed
AUTHORS: GUILLERMO CAJAMARCA P. DARÍO GUERRERO SOLANO ADVISORS: DIRECTOR : Lcdo. Miguel Ponce, Msc. CO-DIRECTOR : Lcdo. MARCOS V. MORALES OCTOBER 2009.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
REPRESENTATION OF THE LANGUAGE BY SIGNS OR SYMBOLS.WRITING SKILL
INDEPENDENT COMPREHENSIBILITY
Write text
without help or
assistance
Write text
without help or
assistance
Write, read and
be understood
by themselves
and others.
Write, read and
be understood
by themselves
and others.
Write own
ideas to read &
be understood.
Write own
ideas to read &
be understood.
HYPOTHESIS
NULL HYPOTHESIS(Ho) WORKING HYPOTHESIS(Hi)
HYPOTHESIS SYSTEM
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
THE DISTANCE LEARNING
EDUCATION DOES NOT
AFFECT THE LANGUAGE
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT.
THE DISTANCE LEARNING
EDUCATION DOES NOT
AFFECT THE LANGUAGE
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT.
THE DISTANCE LEARNING
EDUCATION DOES AFFECT
THE LANGUAGE SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT.
THE DISTANCE LEARNING
EDUCATION DOES AFFECT
THE LANGUAGE SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT.
PART THREE
METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN
ARMY POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN
1) TYPE OF RESEARCH AND DESIGN
RESEARCH: Applied, descriptive,
and of fielding investigation:
. Control and Experimental
. Pre and Post Test.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental,
quantitative and transversal.
1) TYPE OF RESEARCH AND DESIGN
RESEARCH: Applied, descriptive,
and of fielding investigation:
. Control and Experimental
. Pre and Post Test.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental,
quantitative and transversal.
2) SIZE AND SAMPLE
SIZE: 20 students in last
levels of the ALEP of the DLE-ESPE Term March 08-Oct 09.
SAMPLE: Whole population was
considered as NO sample.
2) SIZE AND SAMPLE
SIZE: 20 students in last
levels of the ALEP of the DLE-ESPE Term March 08-Oct 09.
SAMPLE: Whole population was
considered as NO sample.
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN
3) FIELD WORKSupport Center No.50 ALEP-DLE
ESPE (Quito), Term Oct-008 –
Marc-009
Control Group:
10 students
Experimental Group: 10 students
3) FIELD WORKSupport Center No.50 ALEP-DLE
ESPE (Quito), Term Oct-008 –
Marc-009
Control Group:
10 students
Experimental Group: 10 students
4) INSTRUMENTS FOR DATA
COLLECTION
Pre – test.
Post – test.
4) INSTRUMENTS FOR DATA
COLLECTION
Pre – test.
Post – test.
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
PART FOUR
TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS
ARMY POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS
GRAPHICAL EXPOSITION OF
RESULTS
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
EXAMPLES OF RESULTS OBTAINED ON THE TESTS
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
PRE – TEST (LISTENING SKILL)Question 3
What will the weather be like?a.It is going to snowb.It is going to sunc.It is going to rain
RESPONSES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
IT IS GOING TO SNOW 4 40%
IT IS GOING TO SUN 3 30%
IT IS GOING TO RAIN 3 30%
TOTAL:…………. 10 100%
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
PRE – TEST (SPEAKING SKILL) Parameter a):
STRESS
INDICATORSFREQUENCY
STRESSPERCENTAGE
EXCELLENT 0 0%
VERY GOOD 4 40%
GOOD 5 50%
REGULAR 1 10%
DEFICIENT 0 0%
TOTAL:……….. 10 100%
EXAMPLES OF RESULTS OBTAINED ON THE TESTS
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
POST – TEST (LISTENING SKILL)Question 3How much is the skirt?
RESPONSES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
A 7 70%
B 2 20%
C 1 10%
TOTAL:…………. 10 100%
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMPOST –TEST (SPEAKING SKILL)
Parameter a)
STRESS
INDICATORSFREQUENCY
STRESSPERCENTAGE
EXCELLENT 0 0%
VERY GOOD 8 80%
GOOD 2 20%
REGULAR 0 00%
DEFICIENT 0 00%
TOTAL:……….. 10 100%
Interpretation of dataANALYSIS OF RESULTS
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
PRE - TEST
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
POST - TEST
x µ (x - µ) (x - µ)2
17.33 16.20 1.13 1.27
16.6716.20
0.47 0.22
14.6716.20
-1.53 2.34
14.6716.20
-1.53 2.34
15.6716.20
-0.53 0.28
17.6716.20
1.47 2.16
15.6716.20
-0.53 0.28
17.0016.20
0.80 0.64
15.6716.20
-0.53 0.28
17.0016.20
0.80 0.64162.02 10.45
x µ (x - µ) (x - µ)2
18.00 17.30 0.70 0.49
17.0017.30
-0.30 0.09
16.6717.30
-0.63 0.39
16.6717.30
-0.63 0.39
17.3317.30
0.03 0.009
17.6717.30
0.37 0.13
16.6717.30
-0.63 0.39
18.0017.30
0.70 0.49
17.0017.30
-0.30 0.09
18.0017.30
0.70 0.49173.01 2.96
ΣX = 162.02/10 ΣX = 173.01/10
CALCULATION OF THE ARITHMETIC
MEAN
= 16.20
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
ARITMETHIC MEAN
IN THE PRE-TEST
ARITMETHIC MEAN
IN THE POST-TEST
= 17.30
X
X
XXXX
We want to prove the significance of the difference between both results, supported by the hypothesis set in our project.
Next, we test the difference between means, also called “margin of error of the Test T” to accept or reject the hypothesis using the formula below:
nnnn
XXS XX
11
221
22
21
21
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
REPLACING DATA CALCULATION OF T-REASON:
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
Sx1-Sx2 = 0.38
The observed difference is: -2.89
38.0
30.1720.16 T
CALCULATION “DEGREE OF FREEDOM”
(Dof)
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
Dof = (n1+n2 – 2)Dof = (10+10-2)
Dof = 18
The Degree of Freedom (Dof) is the number of participants in the Experimental Group (n1) plus the number of participants in the Control Group (n2) minus 2.
CONSULT WITH THE “T TABLE”:
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
IN THE LEVEL OF 0.05 AND WITH 18 DEGREES OF FREEDOM, WE FOUND A T REASON OF: +2.101 / - 2.101
THE RESULT OBTAINED IN T-REASON (-2.89) IS HIGHER THAN (-2.101) AS DISPLAYED IN T-TABLE, SO WE CAN CONCLUDE THAT, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS IS SIGNIFICANT; THEREFORE THE NULL HYPOTHESIS (Ho) IS REJECTED,AND THE WORKING HYPOTHESIS (Hi) IS ACCEPTED.
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
WORKING HYPOTHESIS
WORKING HYPOTHESIS
-2.89+2.101-2.101
+2.89
WORKING HYPOTHESIS(H
i)
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAMANALYSIS OF RESULTS
IS ACCEPTED, THUS:
“THE DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM DOES AFFECT THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDENTS LANGUAGE SKILLS ”
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
The Distance Learning Education is significant and affects the development of listening and speaking skills.
The Distance Learning Education is significant and affects the development of listening and speaking skills.
A few students have a good command of the Language Skills in English
A few students have a good command of the Language Skills in English
The results showed that AL in DEP allows the students to acquire proficiency in reading and writing. Practice in Listening and speaking are both scarce.
The results showed that AL in DEP allows the students to acquire proficiency in reading and writing. Practice in Listening and speaking are both scarce.
Direction of communication (input and output message) Mode of communication (spoken and written message).
Direction of communication (input and output message) Mode of communication (spoken and written message).
E-learning applied to the Linguistics in English Program is a must alternative to improve the teaching and learning of the LSD nowadays.
E-learning applied to the Linguistics in English Program is a must alternative to improve the teaching and learning of the LSD nowadays.
CONCLUSIONS
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
Come up with practical ways to spur the students’ interest to master the language skills in English on a daily basis.
Come up with practical ways to spur the students’ interest to master the language skills in English on a daily basis.
Assign tasks, projects that motivate the students to want to improve and attain a good command of the language.
Assign tasks, projects that motivate the students to want to improve and attain a good command of the language.
The implementation of a virtual system in Applied Linguistics in English Program will allow the professors and students to take advantage of the TICs.
The implementation of a virtual system in Applied Linguistics in English Program will allow the professors and students to take advantage of the TICs.
Authorities and professors, if possible, should consider providing with audio material that would enhance the learning.
Authorities and professors, if possible, should consider providing with audio material that would enhance the learning.
RECOMMENDATIONS
THE PROPOSAL
PART FIVE
THE PROPOSAL
““VIRTUAL VIRTUAL
LEARNING LEARNING
(E-LEARNING) IN (E-LEARNING) IN
THE APPLIED THE APPLIED
LINGUISTICS IN LINGUISTICS IN
ENGLISH ENGLISH
PROGRAM”PROGRAM”
““VIRTUAL VIRTUAL
LEARNING LEARNING
(E-LEARNING) IN (E-LEARNING) IN
THE APPLIED THE APPLIED
LINGUISTICS IN LINGUISTICS IN
ENGLISH ENGLISH
PROGRAM”PROGRAM”
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
Technologies of Information and Communications (TICs).
Works without limitation of space and time.
Allows to work in asynchronous and synchronous activities.
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
E-LEARNING
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAME-LEARNING
CONTRIBUTION
OF THE
TICs
EASY ACCESS TOA WIDE SOURCE OF
INFO
RAPID PROCESSAND RELIABLE
TYPE OF DATA
CHANNELS OF IMMMEDIATE
COMMUNICATION
E-CAPACITY OF STORAGE
INTER-ACTIVITYOF
INFORMATION
DIGITALIZATION OF
INFORMATION
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAM
ADVANTAGESMultidirectional medium
Information updating
made easy
Cross-platform
E-LEARNINGFlexibility / accessibility
Software widely
available
Inexpensive worldwide distribution
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAME-LEARNING
Convenience andfexibility to
learners
series of opportunities
and tasks
Fluencyand dinamic
communication
PRINCIPLES
Minimun environmental impact
Quality Education
Use of TICs
E S P EAPPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH
PROGRAME-LEARNING
ACTORS
Teachers/Advisors Learners/students
Interaction with graphics designers and system programers.
Knowledge and skills in the management of TICs.
Practice methodological strategies
Ongoing and dynamic communication with everybody
Use of methodologies
High level of autonomy
Use of TICs.
Interaction with everybody
Ongoing communicatio: asynchronous and synchronous −wise