EVALUATION ORIGINAL U-A 2011 Urine Chemistry-Genl INSTITUTION: ATTENTION: CAP NUMBER: Laboratorio Medico Las Americas Medellin ANT CO KIT INFORMATION: 2/11/2011 1/4/2011 Original Evaluation: Kit# 7181660-01 1 Kit Mailed: 23921478 Kit ID: Claudia Velasquez MT Next Mailing Date: 7/11/2011 COPIED TO: LAP CAP IMPORTANT NOTES: NOTE: Due to variability of Urine Albumin results, participants are graded by peer group only. If a peer group had less than 10 participants, the results will receive code 20 'No appropriate target.' LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation: [20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded. Reviewed By Date 0001 The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory. Page 1 of 5
99
Embed
ATTENTION: Claudia Velasquez MT CAP NUMBER: KIT ... · DigitalPT Support from AccuTest . Member_DigitalPT International EQA Collaboration ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Due to variability of Urine Albumin results, participants are graded by peer group only. If a peer group had less than 10 participants, theresults will receive code 20 'No appropriate target.'
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239214781/4/20112/11/2011
U-A 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
U-01 148 16 [20]U-02 158 16 [20]U-03 128 16 [20]
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Osmolality, urinemmol/kg
OTHER
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239214781/4/20112/11/2011
U-A 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
U-01 390 U-02 213 U-03 253 Resultados del resumen de participantes por sistemas de medición tales como Advance instruments, fiske, precision systems, wescor.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239214781/4/20112/11/2011
U-A 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239214781/4/20112/11/2011
U-A 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 7.036 - 7.1170.0144 0.2
B ACC 7.566 - 7.6470.0114 0.2
C ACC 6.953 - 7.0340.0148 0.2
D ACC 7.308 - 7.3890.0083 0.1
E ACC 7.607 - 7.6880.0092 0.1
A ACC 62.8 - 73.82.71 4.0
B ACC 18.6 - 28.70.65 2.8
C ACC 66.4 - 78.01.85 2.6
D ACC 39.2 - 49.31.05 2.4
E ACC 16.5 - 26.60.69 3.2
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Feb/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» pH
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.07
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.62
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.99
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.35
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.63
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» pCO2 mm Hg
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 71
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 24
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 72
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 45
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 23
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
80 7.0763-0.44
80 7.60691.15
78 6.9935-0.23
80 7.34840.19
80 7.6479-1.94
80 68.310.99
77 23.610.60
71 72.18-0.10
78 44.210.76
79 21.572.07
1 of 3 2011/Feb/25Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 30.0 - 43.02.15 5.9
B ACC 64.2 - 78.92.43 3.4
C ACC 104.3 - 128.44.00 3.4
D ACC 170.6 - 203.55.47 2.9
E ACC 117.7 - 140.53.78 2.9
A ACC 1.89 - 2.050.026 1.3
B ACC 0.75 - 0.870.018 2.2
C ACC 2.04 - 2.400.057 2.6
D ACC 1.42 - 1.550.020 1.3
E ACC 0.52 - 0.630.016 2.8
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Feb/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» pO2 mm Hg
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 36
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 73
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 126
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 190
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 131
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» Calcium - Ionized mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.94
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 0.80
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.15
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.51
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 0.60
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
71 36.54-0.25
75 71.510.61
75 116.312.42
75 187.070.54
75 129.120.50
28 1.970-1.13
30 0.810-0.57
30 2.221-1.23
29 1.4881.11
30 0.5731.66
1 of 3 2011/Feb/25Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Laboratory
Test event
2 / 4
Statistical Count
Mean SD
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 5.9 - 7.40.27 4.0
B ACC 17.0 - 20.90.28 1.5
C UNACC 19.2 - 23.50.62 2.9
D ACC 9.4 - 11.60.34 3.2
E ACC 2.2 - 2.90.12 4.7
A ACC 2.0 - 3.10.11 4.3
B ACC 7.9 - 11.90.31 3.1
C ACC 7.6 - 11.60.41 4.2
D ACC 3.7 - 5.60.15 3.3
E ACC 1.4 - 2.20.09 5.1
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Feb/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» Glucose mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.8
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 18.9
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 19.0
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 10.1
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.6
Analyte Score: 80.00%
» Lactate mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.5
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 9.8
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 9.1
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 4.5
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.7
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
12 6.660.52
11 18.94-0.14
10 21.35-3.77
12 10.51-1.21
12 2.560.30
18 2.56-0.51
17 9.87-0.23
18 9.60-1.23
18 4.63-0.87
17 1.81-1.20
1 of 3 2011/Feb/25Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Laboratory
Test event
3 / 4
Statistical Count
Mean SD
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 4.9 - 6.00.06 1.1
B ACC 4.2 - 5.30.06 1.4
C ACC 5.5 - 6.60.07 1.1
D ACC 3.1 - 4.20.05 1.3
E ACC 6.0 - 7.10.08 1.3
A ACC 143 - 1521.3 0.9
B ACC 135 - 1441.1 0.8
C ACC 147 - 1561.7 1.1
D ACC 125 - 1340.9 0.7
E ACC 151 - 1591.4 0.9
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Feb/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» Potassium mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 5.4
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 4.7
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.0
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 3.7
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.6
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» Sodium mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 145
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 138
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 148
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 129
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 156
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
27 5.43-0.54
28 4.73-0.39
28 6.02-0.31
28 3.680.38
28 6.560.47
26 147.5-1.95
28 139.2-1.12
26 151.6-2.07
29 129.8-0.84
28 155.00.68
1 of 3 2011/Feb/25Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[26] = Educational challenge.[30] = Scientific committee decision.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
Lower UpperEvaluation Statistics
Mean
HG-01 88.9 [26]P 89.16 1.05 46 -0.2
7.0 [26]P 8.44 0.55 45 -2.6
1.9 [26]P 2.10 0.11 44 -1.8
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239241362/7/20113/14/2011
HG-A 2011 Hemoglobinopathy SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Text Box
89,8 8,4 2,1
P = Based on peer group statistics
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Hgb Electro, quant %SEBIA CAPILLARYSHB FSEBIA CAPILLARYSHB SSEBIA CAPILLARYSHB C
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
HG-05Dry Lab Challenge ALPHA CHN DELE/MUTATN [26]HG-05 HB HASHARON [26]HG-05 SICKLE SCREEN WILL BE NEG [26]HG-05 CONDITN THAT IS HARMLESS [26]
HG-06 AN ALPHA CHAIN VARIANT [26]HG-06 HIGH O2 AFFINITY HB VARIANT [26]HG-06 HGB G-NORFOLK, TARRANT [26]HG-06 NO THERAPY NEEDED [26]
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239241362/7/20113/14/2011
HG-A 2011 Hemoglobinopathy SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Text Box
8,5 45,73 44,8
calidad
Text Box
95,7 1,98
calidad
Text Box
59,47 2,5 37,17
calidad
Callout
Beta chain deletion. Hb G San Jose. Ver resumen de participantes pagina 9 a 15.
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239185333/15/20114/14/2011
CAR-A 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
CR-01 1 CR-02 41.9 CR-03 2.7 CR-04 85.8 CR-05 4.4 Datos por Vitros, no hay otros instrumentos para compararse. La mayoría de los reportes se encuentran en unidades ng/ml. Ver resumen de participantes.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239185333/15/20114/14/2011
CAR-A 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
<4> Scorecard performance pending future evaluation or may not be applicable due to discontinued testing or use of a waived method.
100
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239185333/15/20114/14/2011
CAR-A 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HCRP432) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 0 - 3.90.16 19.6
B ACC 8.7 - 14.80.65 5.5
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: ci8200Subscription ID 32222 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Mar/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein mg/L
SM:Turbidimetric (IA) 1.0
SM:Turbidimetric (IA) 11.8
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
27 0.831.01
23 11.760.06
1 of 3 2011/Mar/30Print Date
Instrument Model: Abbott Architect ci8200
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Laboratory
Test event
3 / 16
Statistical Count
Mean SD
Sweat Testing (SWEA423) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A *ACC 67 - 751.2 1.7
B *ACC 117 - 1322.3 1.9
C *ACC 32 - 431.7 4.6
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: SweatcheckSubscription ID 32225 Cycle: 01 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Mar/15
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» Conductivity mmol/L
SM:Conductivity 73
SM:Conductivity 129
SM:Conductivity 39
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
6 70.71.93
6 124.81.80
6 37.21.06
1 of 2 2011/Mar/30Print Date
Instrument Model: Wescor Sweat-Chek
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:<NONE>
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
CSM-A 2011CSM-B 2010CSM-A 2010
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239191263/7/20114/21/2011
CSM-A 2011 Immunosuppressive DrugsE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[11] = Unable to analyze (documentation to be provided by laboratory).[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.[26] = Educational challenge.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239181733/14/20114/21/2011
C-A 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
CHM-01 614,4 CHM-02 146 CHM-03 57,3 CHM-04 174,4 CHM-05 145,7 Datos por reactivo Abbott, 35 grados. Nosotros reportamos por reactivo Randox.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 6 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 7 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239181733/14/20114/21/2011
C-A 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
Medias por grupo CHM-01 76.3 CHM-02 49.8 CHM-03 32.6 CHM-04 55.6 CHM-05 50.22
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 8 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 9 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 10 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 11 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 12 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 13 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 14 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 15 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 16 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 17 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 18 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239181733/14/20114/21/2011
C-A 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Subspecialty :7181660 ToxicologyProficiency Event
2010 2
Regulated Analyte Test Event Score %
Proficiency Event2010 3
Proficiency Event2011 1 Cumulative CLIA
'88 PerformanceInterpretation
Current EventPerformanceInterpretationTest Event Score % Test Event Score %
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 19 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:<NONE>
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
CR-A 2011CR-B 2010CR-A 2010
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:<NONE>
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239201414/5/20114/22/2011
GH2-A 2011 Glycohemoglobin SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
IMPORTANT NOTES: Participants Reporting Oligoclonal Bands: Because of spacing limitations on this evaluation report, please note that the result descriptionshave been abbreviated. Please refer to your result form or the PSR for the complete descriptions.
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.[26] = Educational challenge.[27] = Lack of participant or referee consensus.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239207664/11/20115/11/2011
M-A 2011 Cerebrospinal Fluid ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Oligoclonal BandsOLI-01HELENA TITAN GEL MATCH OLIGOCLON BND BOTH [27]
OLI-02 OLIGOCLON BANDS ABSENTOLIGOCLON BANDS ABSENT Good
OLI-03 OLIGOCLON BANDS PRESENTOLIGOCLON BANDS PRESENT Good
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239207664/11/20115/11/2011
M-A 2011 Cerebrospinal Fluid ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[26] = Educational challenge.[27] = Lack of participant or referee consensus.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 5
P = Based on peer group statistics
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-01 6.5 6.68 0.19 733 -0.9 6.0 7.4 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Protein, Totalg/dL
BIURET
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
ELP-A 2011ELP-B 2010ELP-A 2010
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Albumin Electrophor g/dLSEBIA MINICAP
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252164/25/20116/14/2011
ELP-A 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
SPE-01SPE Pattern Interp NO ABNORMALITY [27]
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-01 732 639.5 35.4 111 +2.6 479 800 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Immunoglobulin Gmg/dL
BECKMAN IMMAGE
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252164/25/20116/14/2011
ELP-A 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
P = Based on peer group statistics
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Albumin Electrophor g/dLSEBIA MINICAP
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
Method Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your GradeParaprotein ID
SPE-02 IgA KAPPASEBIA CAPILLARYS IgA KAPPA Good
SPE-02 M-PROTEIN (PARAPROTEIN.)SPE Pattern Interp M-PROTEIN (PARAPROTEIN.) Good
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252164/25/20116/14/2011
ELP-A 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-02 72 70.0 4.7 111 +0.4 52 88 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Immunoglobulin Gmg/dL
BECKMAN IMMAGE
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Bence Jones Protein IDUBJP-01OTHER NO BENCE JONES PROTEIN [26]
Bence Jones Protein IDUBJP-02OTHER KAPPA FREE LIGHT CHAINS [26]
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252164/25/20116/14/2011
ELP-A 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[11] = Unable to analyze (documentation to be provided by laboratory).[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.[26] = Educational challenge.[28] = Response qualified with a greater than or less than sign; or a response is not applicable.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 6 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 7 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239183135/31/20117/8/2011
C-B 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
Muestra CHM-06: Error clerical, valor real 174. Muestra CHM-07: Reprocesar
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 8 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 9 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 10 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 11 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 12 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239183135/31/20117/8/2011
C-B 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
33.1, media por metodo segun resumen de participantes.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 13 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 14 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 15 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 16 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 17 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
<2> Currently successful - At risk for the next two mailings.
98
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 18 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239183135/31/20117/8/2011
C-B 2011 ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Subspecialty :7181660 ToxicologyProficiency Event
2010 3
Regulated Analyte Test Event Score %
Proficiency Event2011 1
Proficiency Event2011 2 Cumulative CLIA
'88 PerformanceInterpretation
Current EventPerformanceInterpretationTest Event Score % Test Event Score %
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 19 of 19
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[11] = Unable to analyze (documentation to be provided by laboratory).[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239186085/24/20117/8/2011
CAR-B 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239186085/24/20117/8/2011
CAR-B 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239186085/24/20117/8/2011
CAR-B 2011 Cardiac Survey SetE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HCRP432) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 0 - 3.80.12 16.2
B ACC 11.3 - 17.30.96 6.7
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: ci8200Subscription ID 32222 Cycle: 02 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Jun/28
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein mg/L
SM:Turbidimetric (IA) 0.8
SM:Turbidimetric (IA) 13.6
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
26 0.730.60
22 14.30-0.72
2 of 3 2011/Jul/15Print Date
Instrument Model: Abbott Architect ci8200
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[28] = Response qualified with a greater than or less than sign; or a response is not applicable.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239215697/11/20118/20/2011
U-B 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239215697/11/20118/20/2011
U-B 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239215697/11/20118/20/2011
U-B 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
U-B 2011U-A 2011U-B 2010
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239215697/11/20118/20/2011
U-B 2011 Urine Chemistry-GenlE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[11] = Unable to analyze (documentation to be provided by laboratory).[26] = Educational challenge.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Sickling TestHG-07 NEGATIVELAB PREPARED/IN-HOUSE NEGATIVE Good
HG-08 NEGATIVENEGATIVE Good
HG-09 POSITIVEPOSITIVE Good
HG-10 NEGATIVENEGATIVE Good
TestSpecimen Your GradeAcceptable ResponseMethod Your Result Good Response
Hgb Electro Alk only
HG-07 [11]
HG-08 [11]
HG-09 [11]
HG-10 [11]
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239241478/8/20119/13/2011
HG-B 2011 Hemoglobinopathy SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
P = Based on peer group statistics
TestSpecimen Your GradeAcceptable ResponseMethod Your Result Good Response
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
Lower UpperEvaluation Statistics
Mean
HG-07 97.7 [26]P 97.78 0.15 16 -0.5
2.3 [26]P 2.24 0.14 17 +0.4
HG-08 63.7 [26]P 63.28 2.49 18 +0.2
1.0 [26]P 2.24 0.59 12 -2.1
35.0 [26]P 34.46 1.72 16 +0.3
HG-09 58.4 [26]P 60.25 1.33 16 -1.4
2.4 [26]P 1.75 0.41 15 +1.6
35.8 [26]P 35.26 1.18 16 +0.5
2.0 [26]P 2.28 0.17 16 -1.6
HG-10 96.8 [26]P 97.79 0.40 16 -2.5
2.0 [26]P 2.01 0.15 17 -0.1
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239241478/8/20119/13/2011
HG-B 2011 Hemoglobinopathy SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 4
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239241478/8/20119/13/2011
HG-B 2011 Hemoglobinopathy SurveyE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[11] = Unable to analyze (documentation to be provided by laboratory).[26] = Educational challenge.[28] = Response qualified with a greater than or less than sign; or a response is not applicable.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 5
P = Based on peer group statistics
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-03 5.8 5.99 0.23 733 -0.8 5.3 6.6 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Protein, Totalg/dL
BIURET
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
ELP-B 2011ELP-A 2011ELP-B 2010
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Albumin Electrophor g/dLSEBIA MINICAP
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252338/8/20119/19/2011
ELP-B 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
P = Based on peer group statistics
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Paraprotein Peak %SEBIA MINICAP
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
Lower UpperEvaluation Statistics
Mean
SPE-03 67.8 [26]P 59.57 2.33 27 +3.5Test
Method Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your GradeParaprotein ID
SPE-03 IgA LAMBDASEBIA CAPILLARYS IgA LAMBDA Good
SPE-03 M-PROTEIN (PARAPROTEIN.)SPE Pattern Interp M-PROTEIN (PARAPROTEIN.) Good
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-03 207 204.0 12.0 103 +0.3 152 255 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Immunoglobulin Gmg/dL
BECKMAN IMMAGE
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252338/8/20119/19/2011
ELP-B 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
5 (Mediana) Resumen de participantes.
P = Based on peer group statistics
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen MeanYour
Result S.D.No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
SPE-04 6.3 6.72 0.23 735 -1.8 6.0 7.4 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Protein, Totalg/dL
BIURET
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
ELP-B 2011ELP-A 2011ELP-B 2010
Test
Methods
Unit Of Measure--
Albumin Electrophor g/dLSEBIA MINICAP
Specimen Your Result S.D. Labs Your GradeS.D.ILimits of Acceptability
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252338/8/20119/19/2011
ELP-B 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Paraprotein IDSPE-04SEBIA CAPILLARYS [11]
SPE-04 NO ABNORMALITYSPE Pattern Interp NO ABNORMALITY Good
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Bence Jones Protein IDUBJP-03OTHER NO BENCE JONES PROTEIN [26]
Bence Jones Protein IDUBJP-04OTHER NO BENCE JONES PROTEIN [26]
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 5
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239252338/8/20119/19/2011
ELP-B 2011 ElectrophoresisE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
calidad
Callout
Kappa free light chains
calidad
Callout
Lambda free light chains
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 7.397 - 7.4780.0083 0.1
B ACC 7.071 - 7.1520.0069 0.1
C ACC 7.045 - 7.1260.0113 0.2
D ACC 7.489 - 7.5700.0069 0.1
E ACC 7.717 - 7.7970.0094 0.1
A ACC 33.1 - 43.20.80 2.1
B ACC 70.3 - 82.62.07 2.7
C ACC 61.8 - 72.72.29 3.4
D ACC 25.5 - 35.60.69 2.3
E ACC 12.1 - 22.20.64 3.7
A ACC 81.4 - 98.82.90 3.2
B ACC 151.9 - 186.55.76 3.4
C ACC 28.8 - 44.72.64 7.2
D ACC 198.4 - 245.87.88 3.6
E ACC 176.2 - 222.27.65 3.8
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 03 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Sep/27
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» pH
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.44
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.12
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.09
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.53
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.75
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» pCO2 mm Hg
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 37
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 74
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 64
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 30
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 17
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» pO2 mm Hg
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 93
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 174
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 36
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 229
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 207
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
82 7.43790.25
83 7.11191.17
81 7.08510.44
83 7.52930.10
82 7.7570-0.74
80 38.13-1.40
81 76.41-1.16
82 67.24-1.42
80 30.55-0.80
81 17.12-0.19
79 90.101.00
80 169.190.84
80 36.77-0.29
79 222.060.88
79 199.161.02
3 of 3 2011/Oct/04Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Laboratory
Test event
1 / 3
Statistical Count
Contact Name Claudia Velasquez E. Fax 011-574-3400510Email [email protected]
Mean SD
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 1.28 - 1.410.020 1.5
B ACC 1.57 - 1.670.016 1.0
C ACC 1.90 - 2.070.027 1.4
D ACC 0.84 - 0.920.011 1.2
E ACC 0.85 - 0.940.013 1.4
A ACC 11.3 - 13.90.21 1.7
B ACC 4.0 - 5.00.16 3.5
C ACC 5.8 - 7.20.17 2.7
D ACC 13.2 - 16.20.31 2.1
E ACC 1.5 - 2.30.15 8.0
A ACC 5.0 - 7.60.21 3.3
B ACC 2.9 - 4.40.09 2.4
C ACC 2.0 - 3.00.08 3.2
D ACC 7.1 - 10.80.21 2.3
E ACC 0.6 - 1.10.08 9.9
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 03 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Sep/27
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» Calcium - Ionized mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.35
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.63
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 1.96
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 0.89
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 0.9
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» Glucose mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 12.5
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 4.4
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.4
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 14.2
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.1
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» Lactate mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 6.3
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 3.6
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.5
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 8.8
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 0.9
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
34 1.3440.28
34 1.6200.60
33 1.982-0.81
34 0.8820.69
33 0.8930.53
20 12.61-0.51
20 4.47-0.47
20 6.48-0.49
20 14.68-1.54
19 1.881.48
24 6.32-0.10
24 3.63-0.38
24 2.50-0.05
22 8.99-0.90
23 0.850.57
3 of 3 2011/Oct/04Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
Laboratory
Test event
2 / 3
Statistical Count
Mean SD
Blood Gas / Electrolytes (BGAS435) - Performance Report
Laboratory Results Summary
A ACC 3.6 - 4.60.07 1.6
B ACC 6.9 - 8.00.06 0.7
C ACC 4.9 - 6.00.03 0.6
D ACC 2.8 - 3.80.00 0.0
E ACC 1.7 - 2.80.05 2.2
A ACC 130 - 1390.9 0.7
B ACC 105 - 1141.0 0.9
C ACC 143 - 1521.4 0.9
D ACC 118 - 1270.9 0.7
E ACC 156 - 1651.6 1.0
CO1033AI PageLaboratorio Medico Las Americas
CAP LAP Number 7181660
Instrument Nickname: GemSubscription ID 32219 Cycle: 03 - 2011
Results Deadline 2011/Sep/27
Analyte Sample Problem Code
SDICOMPARATIVE GROUP DATA
CV(%)
» Potassium mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 4.1
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 7.4
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 5.4
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 3.3
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 2.3
Analyte Score: 100.00%
» Sodium mmol/L
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 134
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 109
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 148
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 122
ID:IL GEM Premier 3000 159
Analyte Score: 100.00%
Grade: ACC - Acceptable; UNACC - Unacceptable; *ACC or *UNACC: Ungradable result due to either lack of peer group consensus or insufficient number of participants. As required by CLIA/CAP, you must verify the accuracy of these ungradable results.» This result is designated for regulatory purposes.Peer Group(PG) Codes: AR-all results; AU-all results in specific unit; ME-method; SM-submethod; RM-reagent manufacturer; RG-reagent group; RE-reagent; IM-instrument manufacturer; IG-instrument group; ID-instrument modelProblem Codes: 1(Failure to participate); 2(Failure - Excl Requested); 11(Below Linear/Detection Limit); 22(Above Linear/Detection Limit); 33(Analyzer Out of Service); 66(Specimen Not Appropriate); 88(Testing Suspended During Test Event);
DigitalPT Support from AccuTest Member_DigitalPT International EQA [email protected] | tel 604.222.3900 | fax 604.222.3901 | www.digitalpt.comPO Box 999 Westford, MA, 01886, USA
30 4.10-0.05
30 7.42-0.36
30 5.41-0.33
31 3.300.00
31 2.280.45
31 134.1-0.11
32 109.5-0.54
32 147.70.23
32 122.7-0.80
30 160.1-0.65
3 of 3 2011/Oct/04Print Date
Instrument Model: IL GEM Premier 3000
YOUR LAB'S DATAResult Grade Peer Group Code:Description Acceptable Results
IMPORTANT NOTES: Participants Reporting Oligoclonal Bands: Because of spacing limitations on this evaluation report, please note that the result descriptionshave been abbreviated. Please refer to your result form or the PSR for the complete descriptions.
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.[26] = Educational challenge.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239208369/6/201110/6/2011
M-B 2011 Cerebrospinal Fluid ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Oligoclonal BandsOLI-04 OLIGOCLON BANDS PRESENTHELENA TITAN GEL OLIGOCLON BANDS PRESENT Good
OLI-05 MATCH OLIGOCLON BND BOTHMATCH OLIGOCLON BND BOTH Good
OLI-06 OLIGOCLON BANDS ABSENTOLIGOCLON BANDS ABSENT Good
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasClaudia Velasquez MTMedellin ANT CO
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
239208369/6/201110/6/2011
M-B 2011 Cerebrospinal Fluid ChemistryE V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL