ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW ST. FRANCIS …...CORPORATE AFFAIRS, STRATEGIC PLANNING AND PROPERTY Page 35 of 263 Page 2 of 5 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As a result of oversubscription pressures

PUBLIC

ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW

ST. FRANCIS XAVIER, ST. FIDELIS,

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION

“Complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind, Philippians 2:2”

Created, Draft First Tabling Review

May 6, 2014 May 15, 2014

Joseph Ruscitti, Senior Manager, Planning Services

John Volek, Senior Coordinator, Planning, Admissions and Accountability

Gina Iuliano-Marrello, Superintendent of Education, Area 3

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Vision:

At Toronto Catholic we transform the world

through witness, faith, innovation and action.

Mission:

The Toronto Catholic District School Board is an

inclusive learning community rooted in the love of

Christ. We educate students to grow in grace and

knowledge and to lead lives of faith, hope and

charity.

G. Poole

Associate Director of Academic Affairs

A. Sangiorgio

Associate Director of Planning and Facilities

S. Pessione

Associate Director of Business Services,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Angela Gauthier

Director of Education

REPORT TO

CORPORATE AFFAIRS, STRATEGIC

PLANNING AND PROPERTY

COMMITTEE

Page 35 of 263

Page 2 of 5

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

As a result of oversubscription pressures in the community served by St. Fidelis, St.

Francis Xavier and Immaculate Conception, these schools were identified and approved

as candidates for a fixed attendance boundary review in a report to Corporate Affairs,

Strategic Planning and Property Committee on October 18, 2012. Implementing a fixed

attendance boundary is an effective means of managing enrolment in a school in order to

optimize the use of available space in a facility, as well as to assist in balancing

enrolment at nearby schools. The Boundary Review Committee (BRC) has completed its

report and has submitted it to the Director of Education in accordance with the

Elementary School Attendance Boundary Policy (S.A. 03).

In response to the BRC’s report, this report recommends that the fixed attendance

boundary for each school, as detailed in Scenario #2 (Appendix ‘A’), be considered for

approval at the Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee meeting on

May 15, 2014. This is the same scenario supported by the BRC.

This report further recommends that opportunity for public input with respect to the

recommendations contained herein, as well as the BRC’s report, be provided at the

regularly scheduled meeting of the Board on May 22, 2014.

B. PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to review the BRC’s report and to recommend a boundary

option that will address the enrolment pressures and balance the enrolment between the

three facilities, St. Francis Xavier, St. Fidelis and Immaculate Conception, serving this

community.

C. BACKGROUND

1. The Elementary Attendance Boundary Policy (S.A. 03) (Appendix ‘B’) was approved

by the Board on October 18, 2012. The Policy states as follows:

“Policy

The Director of Education may prepare a report for consideration by the Board

identifying a school, or group of schools, facing programming challenges and/or facility

limitations due to enrolment oversubscription or under subscription, and in respect of

which there may be a need to consider and review the possible implementation of

boundaries in respect of one or more of the identified schools.

Page 36 of 263

Page 3 of 5

Regulations

1. An attendance boundary review shall be initiated by the community, the Director

of Education or Board staff through a submission of a formal request to the Board

of Trustees compliant with Board procedures, or through a recommendation by

Board staff.”

2. Initiation of an attendance boundary review at St. Francis Xavier, St. Fidelis and

Immaculate Conception was approved by the Board on October 18, 2012. The review

process, undertaken in accordance with the Elementary Attendance Boundary Policy

(S.A. 03), spanned approximately four months, with public meetings held on

February 4, 2014 and March 18, 2014. Notes from the public meetings are included

in Appendix ‘C’. The BRC completed its report and submitted it to the Director of

Education on April 22, 2014 (Appendix ‘D’).

3. All information discussed as part of the boundary review process, as well as material

provided to the Committee for consideration, and the notes from public meetings

were made available on the Board’s website. The BRC’s report was also posted on

the website.

4. Planning staff presented several boundary options for consideration as part of their

presentation to the BRC members. After several meetings and discussion amongst

the members of the BRC, the options were narrowed to three scenarios for

presentation and consideration at the public meetings. These options were the “Status

Quo” (existing FDK catchment areas as the fixed boundaries), Scenario #1 and

Scenario #2.

5. Based on a Ministry rated capacity of 369 students, St. Fidelis is currently

oversubscribed with an enrolment of 599 students (as of October 31, 2013). There

are currently 6 portables on site to accommodate the overflow. A business case has

been submitted to the Ministry to approve an addition or replacement facility for the

St. Fidelis community.

6. Based on a Ministry rated capacity of 524 students, St. Francis Xavier is also

operating at capacity with an enrolment of 515 students (as of October 31, 2013).

There are currently 2 portables on site to accommodate programming overflow.

7. Based on a Ministry rated capacity of 543 students, Immaculate Conception is

operating slightly below capacity with an enrolment of 440 students (as of October

31, 2013).

D. EVIDENCE/RESEARCH/ANALYSIS

8. In order to assist the BRC with its discussion on boundary solutions, Planning staff

submitted several boundary options for consideration as part of the review process.

As indicated earlier in this report, these options were considered by the BRC

Page 37 of 263

Page 4 of 5

members and narrowed to 3 scenarios for presentation at the public meetings.

Scenario #2 is a hybrid of several scenarios and is considered by Planning staff and

members of the BRC to provide the most balanced enrolment and the best overall

solution for all communities. This scenario is premised on a capital solution at St.

Fidelis.

9. After careful consideration of all comments and input received from members of the

BRC, individuals from the school communities, and the local parish during the public

consultation process, it is the conclusion of Planning staff that the most effective

boundary option is Scenario #2 (Appendix ‘A’).

10. Appendix ‘E’ shows the impact on projected enrolment at each school resulting from

the implementation of fixed attendance boundaries as they are detailed in Scenario

#2. In summary, Immaculate Conception will experience a projected increase of

approximately 147 students by 2027. Based on an OTG capacity of 529, this

represents a utilization of approximately 111%. St. Fidelis will experience a projected

increase of approximately 62 students by 2027. Based on an OTG capacity of 369,

this represents a utilization of approximately 179%, however, with an anticipated

capital improvement to the school the estimated OTG capacity would increase to 658

and decrease the utilization to approximately 100%. St. Francis Xavier will

experience a projected increase of approximately 92 students by 2027. Based on an

OTG capacity of 524, this represents a utilization of approximately 116%.

11. The BRC was informed by staff that all students currently attending these schools

will have the option to remain at their existing location. Students who presently have

siblings at these schools who are expected to be in the school for the next school year

shall also gain admission.

12. In accordance with the Elementary Attendance Boundary Policy (S.A. 03), the

following sequence of Committee/Board meetings will be required prior to final

approval of recommendations.

May 15, 2014 – Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee

Director’s Report is considered.

Defer any final decisions on boundary recommendations.

May 22, 2014 – Regular Board

Provide opportunity for public input (delegations and written submissions)

regarding the Director’s Report and the BRC Report.

Defer any final decisions on boundary recommendations.

June 5, 2014 – Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee

Further report from Director of Education is considered, which takes into

account the results of public input provided at the previous Board meeting.

Board to make final decision on recommendations.

Page 38 of 263

Page 5 of 5

E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. That an opportunity for public input regarding the recommendations contained in this

report as well as the Boundary Review Committee’s report, be provided at the regularly

scheduled Board meeting of May 22, 2014.

2. That the fixed attendance boundary identified as Scenario #2 in Appendix ‘A’ of this

report, be considered for approval at the regularly scheduled Corporate Affairs, Strategic

Planning and Property Committee meeting of June 5, 2014.

Page 39 of 263

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

KEEL

E�ST

CALE

DO

NIA

RD

JAN

E�ST

WILSON AVE

ROGERS RD

DU

FFER

INST

WESTON

RD

LAWRENCE�AVE�W

BLACKCREEK

DR

EGLINTON AVE W

TRETHEWEY DR

GULLIVER RD INGRAM�DR

BRIDGELAND�AVE

OLD

WESTO

NRD

YORE�RD

KEEL

E�S T

RUSTIC�RD

CULF

ORD

�RD

FALSTAFF�AVE

QUEENS�DR

MAPLE LEAF DR

JAY�

ST

KAN

E �AV

E

SCO

TT�R

D

TYCOS�DR

CASTLEFIELD�AVE

ERIE

�ST

GRACEFIELD�AVE

PLAYFAIR�AVE

SILV

E RT H

OR N

� AV

E

ORFUS�RD

DOWNSVIEW�AVE

AVON

�AVE

BURR�AVE

REGENT�RD

ROCK

CLI F

F E�B

LVD

VICTORY�DR

LAMBTON�AVE

BICK

NEL

L�AV

E

GLEN�PARK�AVE

WYNDALE�DR

GLENCAIRN�AVE

NA

IRN

�AV

E

INDUSTRY�ST

RON

ALD

�AV

E

MA

CLEO

D�S

T

ENN

ERD

ALE

�RD

RAY�AVE

HA

RVIE

� AV

E

SHEF

FIEL

D�S

T

DUNRAVEN�DR

ALLIANCE�AVE

RAVEN�RD

GLEN�LONG�AVE

DU

FFL A

W�R

D

BECKETT�AVE

BOO

N� A

VE

RICHARD�CLARK�DR

CAMERON�AVE

CORN

ELIU

S�PK

WY

DA Y

�AV

E

FLORAL�PKWY

ANTHONY�RD

WES

TMO

UN

T�A V

E

BLA

C KTH

ORN

�AV

E

BRO

OKH

AV

END

R

CARTWRIGHT�AVE

NO

RTH

C LI F

F E� B

L VD

AILEEN�AVE

COMAY�RD

GREENBR OOK DR

WINGOLD�AVE

EPSOM�DOWNS�DR

GLENGROVE�AVE

CLEARVIEW�HTS

YORE�RD

LAWNSIDE�DR

GROVEDALE�AVE

GIL

BER T

� AV

E

MCR

OBE

RTS�

A VE

DEL�RIA�DR

AM

ESBU

RYD

R

RID

GE�

R D

DENSLEY�AVE

YPRES�RD

MCCORMACK ST

KEEL

E �S T

KITCHENER AVE

CORDELLA�AVE

CAYUGA�AVE

DONALD�AVE

APE

X�RD

RORY�RD

BENTWORTH�AVE

ROSE

THO

RN�A

VE

TROWELL�AVE

HAV

EN�R

D

STRATHNAIRNA

VE

KIN

COR T

� ST

EAR L

SCO

URT

� AV

E

SPALDING�RD

ASTORIA AVE

NORTH PARK DR

HUMBER�BLV

D

DYN

EVO

R �R D

TED

DE R

S T

TREE

LAW

NPK

WY

SCHELL�AVE

HARDING�AVE

SAMOR�RD

HATHERLEY�RD

FLAMBOROUGH DR

SELL

E RS�

AVE

LONBOROUGH�AVE

THURODALE�AVE

WINSTON PARK BLVD

KATHERINE�RDWILLIAM CRAGG DR

EUG

ENE�

ST

VIA�CASSIA�DR

HYDE�AVE

RICH

ARD

SON

�AV

E

LAPP�ST

GRA

Y �AV

E

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

DORSEY DR

PAU

L�D

A VID

�ST

NORTHLAND�AVE

LAN

SDO

WN

E�A V

E

YARR

OW

�RD

STEL

LAS

T

SNID

ER�A

VE

L EXF

I EL D

�AV

E

LITT

L E�B

LVD

MI R

AN

DA

�AV

E

MU

RRA

YRD

VENN�CRES

JOCA

DA

�RD

J ASPER AVE

MO

NT C

ALM

�AV

E

UN

I ON

�ST

REN

FIEL

D�S

T

ING

LESI

DE�

DR

LESTER�AVE

J ULIET CRES

TURNBERRY�AVE

TODD

BAYLISBLVD

GRE

END

ALE

�AV

E

AG

ATE�

RD

PRI V

ET� R

D

FAIR

BAN

K�AV

E

CON

NIE

�ST

KIRK

NEW

TON

�RD

SAG

E�AV

E

HIL

LDA

L E�R

D

KERSDALE�AVE

WHITLEY�AVE

KATIE CRT

AN

CAST

ER�R

D

ROSELAWN�AVE

TOUCHSTONE�DR

BERT

RAM

�ST

GLE

NH

AVEN

�ST

DU

VAL�

DR

HA

RTL E

Y �AV

E

INNES�AVE

DENNIS�AVE

SUMMIT�AVE

ROCKC

L IF F E CRT

LEIG

H�S

T

MARCIA�AVE

NORANDA DR

PHOTOGRAPHYDR

QUINAN�DR

LANGDEN A VE

BEN

TON

�RD

BROME�RD

PA RKCHES T ERRD

BLU

E�SP

RIN

GS�

RD

HOLWOOD�AVE

EVERSFIELD�RD

BROWNVILLE�AVE

MA

IDST

ON

E�ST

LAVENDER�RD

BERTAL RD

MILLENNIUM�DR

IA NHALL RD

HARROW DR

LACE

Y �AV

E

NASHVILLE�AVE

MAY

O�D

R

CHA

MBE

RS� A

VE

WESTDALE�DR LAD

Y�YO

R K�A

VE

SPEA

RS�S

T

HILLARY�AVE

HAV

ERSO

NB

LVD

TUM

PAN

ES

T

LISCOM

BERD

PLATIN

UM

DR

MILFORD AVE

HOLMESDALE RD

YORK�AVE

BRO

NO

CO�A

VE

GADE�DR

IRVING�RD

BRA

NST

ON

E �RD

CLAY

BRO

OKE

�ST

CLIF

F �S T

BLA

ND

ORM

AN

�RD

CHA

MB E

RLA

IN�A

VE

GRO

TON

� ST

B RY N

�RD

VEERLAND�DR

ARROWSMITH AVE

HIG

HV

I EW

� AV

E

KING

GEORGES DR

MA

RIA

NFE

LD�A

VE

EUPH

RASI

AD

R

CAN

T ON

�AV

E

KEITH�AVE

MO

NTA

NA

�AV

E

RODING

ST

MU

NIC

I PA

LD

R

CLE V

E DO

N�S

T

CORBY�AVE

CRO

HA

M� R

D

ROLLET�DR

BOWIE�AVE

TEIGNMOUTH�AVE

BUSHEY A V E

PRES

C OTT

�AV

E

J ACI NTA DR

PEAREN�ST

BLOEM�AVE

LESWYN�RD

GU

ESTV

I LL E

�AV

E

PAMILLE�PL

MAYBAN

K�AVE

MANGROVE RD

DA

NTE

RD

HAW KIN SD

R

DE

MA

RCO

BLVD

WESTBURY

CRES

ROTHE RHAM AVE

GOTHAM�CRT

SYMES�RD

WESTACRES�DR

SABL

E�ST

CRAYDON�AVE

JOYCE�PKWY

CENTREPARK�DR

VICTORIA�BLVD

EWART�AVE

SYNDICATE AVE

DALRYMPLE DR

KINKORA�DR

SMALLWO

OD

DR

HEARST

CRCL

VEN

ICE�

DR

WINTERGREEN�RD

CHA

PPE L

�HIL

L�RD

VAL ENCIACRES

GA

BIA

N�W

AY

PA

ULSON RD

REDBANK�RD

RED

BERR

Y�PK

WY

GILPIN�AVE

PA

RSO N CRT

RUTHERFORD�AVE

SEA

BRO

OK�

AVE

WOOLNER�AVE

PRES T ON

RD

PAXTONIA�BLVD

CLEO

� RD

S PR I

NG

VIE

W�A

VE

SPA

RTA

�RD

SENECA�AVE

MONARCHDALE�AVE

EPIC

LAN

ERD

HEA

RNE�

AVE

RAMSDEN�RD

WAT

T�AV

E

CALA

IS�A

VE

LOTH

ERTON PTWY

TEST

ON

� BLV

D

WICKFORD DR

NICKLE�ST

GARSIDE�CRES

WESTCHESTER RD

MA

RTIN

I�DR

DUBRAY AVE

REDF

ERN

�AVE

ALY

WA

RD�S

T

BATTERSEA CRE S

MARSHLYNN�AVE

CHUDLEIGH�RD

KENO

RA CRES

HALLSPORT C RES

ENN

E RD

ALE

�ST

HARLTON

CRES

PALA

MAR

�RD

HAW

KSD

ALE

� RD

GLENVALLEY�DR

ROCHDALE�AVE

HUNTER AVE

HAFIS�RD

THORNTON�AVE

KEYWEST�AVE

MAHONEY�AVE

VIA

TORR

ED

R

WESTCLIFFE RD

FLEE

TWO

OD

�AV

E

HOLLIS�

STLOCUST

�ST

HOLMESDALE CRES

KEEL

ESD

ALE

DR

PEM

BER�

DR

RIDGE POINT CRES

RAITHERM�RD

HIL LBORN A VE

VIA�AURELIA�DR

JULI

AN

�RD

RAINSWOOD CRT

NORDALE CRES

UP WOO D

AVE

BLACKSTON

EST

BOU

RDO

N�A

VE

DONOFR

EERD

SAN

DER

STEA

D�A

VE

COLF

AX�

ST

REG

ENT�

ST

HYS

EL�R

D

L AN

DO

UR �

AVE

BELGRAVIA AVE

WO

OLT

O

N CRES

CAM

EO

CRES

ROM

EO�S

T

OLY

MPIA DR

FLAM I

NG

OCR

ES

BARTONVILLE�AVE�E

LAWRENCE S ERVICE RD N

BRIDGELAND�AVE

WO

OD

BOROUGH

AVE

GREENT R EE CRT

LIVINGSTONE AVE

ELH

URS

T�CR

T

CLARKSON�AVE

WHITMORE AVE

SOM

ERVILL

E�AVE

DEAKIN�AVE

DEVER ELL

CRES

CAESAR�AVE

SUNNYBRA E CRES

PARA

MOUNT CRT

SORLYN AVE

BLU

EBEL

L�G

T

PORTER�AVE

GRAHAM�RD

MARTIN�ST

AST

RAL�

ST

ARK

WRI

GH

T�ST

GIBSON�ST

CIRCLE RIDGE

ARN

OLD

�AV

E

MARSHALL BLVD

MARTHA EA TONW

AY

THE�WISHBONE

CRIPPS�AVE

PITKIN�CRT

CONVENT�CRT

DENARDA�ST

REDHILL�AVE

SHO

RTT�

ST

HELEN�AVE

EDISON�CRCL

BRIE

F�RD

VANWYCK�RD

YORKTOWN�DR

DARIEN�CRT

NORTHWESTERN�AVE

HOMER�AVE

DORSEY�CRT

OXFORD�D

R

ROWAN�AVE

CARRINGTON�AVE

FOX�POINT

BERR

YTO

N�A

VE

LOO

KOU

T�PL

STEWART�SMITH�DR

PRA

DO

�CRT

WEL

DO

N�C

RT

NO

RCRE

ST�D

R AM

BER�CRE S

RICA

RDO

�RD

EWART�AVE

GIL

BERT

�AV

E

SCHELL�AVE

ENN

ERD

ALE

�ST

CLIF

F�ST

DONALD AVE

HA

RVIE

� AV

E

LAN

SDO

WN

E�A V

E

MCR

OBE

RTS �

AVE

SPEA

RSST

CLIF

F �S T

GU

E STV

I LL E

�AV

E

KEEL

E�ST

JOYCE�PKWY

AILEEN�AVE

CORN

ELIU

S�PK

WY

MIR

AN

DA

�AV

E

NA

IRN

AV

E

BOWIE�AVE

BENTWORTH�AVE

SCHELL�AVE

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

BLAC

KTH

ORN

AV

EJOYCE�PKWY

St�Matthew

St�Fidelis

St�Bernard

Santa�Maria

Regina�Mundi

St�John�Bosco

St�Philip�Neri

St�Francis�Xavier

St�Nicholas�of�Bari

Our�Lady�of�Victory

Immaculate�Conception

�� Boundary�Descriptions

E

0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.40.3Kilometres

Prepared�by:�TCDSB�Planning�ServicesApril�2013

St.�Francis�Xavier�Boundary Immaculate�Conception�BoundarySt.�Fidelis�BoundaryNorth�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres,�Culford�Rd,�George�Anderson�Dr,�Keele�St,�Colville�Rd,�between�lot�lines�83�Colville�Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd.

East�Boundary�(North�to�South):�CNR�Railway

South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Eglinton�Ave�W

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�Black�Creek�Dr

North�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�2�28�(even)�&�38�92�(even)�Beckett�Ave,�between�lot�92�&�94�Beckett�Ave,�between�lot�68�&�70�Falstaff�Ave,�rear�lot�line�89�Springview�Ave,�Highway�401


South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Maple�Leaf�Dr,�Keele�St,�South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St,�rear�lot�lines�9�63�(odd)Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�lines�6,7,5,3�Lookout�Place,�93�97�&�103�107�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�line�17�Edison�Cir,�rear�lot�line�587�Rustic�Rd

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�Jane�St,�Highway�400�(Black�Creek�Dr�On�Ramp)

\ Elementary Schools

Expressway

Major Roads

Local Roads

Parks

St. Fidelis

St. Francis Xavier

Immaculate Conception

North�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Highway�400�(Black�Creek�DrOn�Ramp),�Maple�Leaf�Dr,�Keele�St,�South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St,�rear�lot�lines�9�63�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�lines�6,7,5,3Lookout�Place,�93�97�&�103�107�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�line�17�Edison�Cir,�rear�lot�line�587�Rustic�Rd


South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres,�Culford�Rd,�George�Anderson�Dr,�Keele�St,�Colville�Rd,�between�lot�lines�83�Colville�Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�Jane�St,�Queens�Dr,�Black�Creek�River,�Lawrence�Ave�W,�Black�Creek�Dr

Rear�lot�lines�2�28�&�38�92�(even)�Beckett�Ave

Between�lot�92�&�94�Beckett�Ave

HIGHWAY�401 HIGHWAY�401

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

HWY�400

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

KEEL

E�ST

South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St

Rear�lot�lines�9�63�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky

Rear�lot�lines�6,7,5,3�Lookout�Place

93�97�&�103�107�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky

Rear�lot�line�17�Edison�Cir

Rear�lot�line�587�Rustic�Rd

JAN

E�ST

JAN

E�ST

BLACK

BLACK�CREEK�DR GEORGE�ANDERSON�DR

BLACK�CREEK�D

RRear�lot�lines�1�19�

(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres

CULFORD�RDBetween�lot�lines�83�Colville�

Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd

CREEK RIVER

EGLINTON�AVE�W

Between�lot�68�&�70�Falstaff�Ave�Rear�lot�line�89�Springview�Ave

COLVILLE�RD

KEEL

E�ST

QUEENS�DR

LAWRENCE�AVE�W

'A-1'Page 40 of 263

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

KEEL

E�ST

CALE

DO

NIA

RD

WILSON AVE

JAN

E�ST

ROGERS RD

DU

FFER

INST

LAWRENCE�AVE�W

WESTON

RD

BLACKCREEK

DR

EGLINTON AVE W

TRETHEWEY D R

GULLIVER RD INGRAM�DR

BRIDGELAND�AVE

OLD

WESTO

NRD

YORE�RD

KEEL

E �S T

RUSTIC�RD

CULF

ORD

�RD

FALSTAFF�AVE

QUEENS�DR

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

JAY�

ST

KAN

E�AV

E

SCO

TT�R

D

TYCOS�DR

CASTLEFIELD�AVE

ERIE

�ST

GRACEFIELD�AVE

PLAYFAIR�AVE

ORFUS�RD

SILV

E RT H

OR N

�AV

E

DOWNSVIEW�AVE

AVON

�AVE

BURR�AVE

REGENT�RD

NO

RTH

CLIF

FE�B

LVD

VICTORY�DR

ROCK

CLI F

F E�B

LVD

BICK

NEL

L�A V

E

LAMBTON�AVE

GLEN�PARK�AVE

WYNDALE�DR

GLENCAIRN�AVE

NA

IRN

�AV

E

INDUSTRY�ST

RON

ALD

�AV

E

MA

CLEO

D�S

T

ENN

ERD

ALE

�RD

RAY�AVE

SHEF

FIEL

D�S

T

DUNRAVEN�DR

HA

RVIE

� AV

E

RAVEN�RD

ALLIANCE�AVE

GLEN�LONG�AVE

DU

FFL A

W�R

D

BECKETT�AVE

RICHARD�CLARK�DR

BOO

N�A

VE

CAMERON�AVE

ANTHONY�RD

CORN

ELIU

S�PK

WY

FLORAL�PKWY

DAY

�AV

E

WE S

T MO

UN

T �A V

E

BLA

CKTH

ORN

� AV

E

BRO

OKH

AV

END

R

CARTWRIGHT�AVE

AILEEN�AVE

COMAY�RD

GREENBR OOK DR

WINGOLD�AVE

EPSOM�DOWNS�DR

GLENGROVE�AVE

CLEARVIEW�HTS

YORE�RD

LAWNSIDE�DR

GROVEDALE�AVE

GIL

BER T

� AV

E

MCR

OBE

RTS�

A VE

DEL�RIA�DR

AM

ESBU

RYD

R

RID

GE�

RD

DENSLEY�AVE

YPRES�RD

MCCORMACK ST

APE

X�RD

KEEL

E �S T

KITCHENER AVE

CORDELLA�AVE

CAYUGA�AVE

DONALD�AVE

RORY�RD

BENTWORTH�AVE

TROWELL�AVE

ROSE

THO

RN�A

VE

HAV

EN�R

D

STRATHNAIRNA

VE

KIN

COR T

� ST

SPALDING�RD

SAMOR�RD

EARL

SCO

URT

� AV

E

NORTH PARK DR

HUMBER�BLV

D

DYN

EVO

R �R D

TE D

DE R

ST

TREE

LAW

NPK

WY

SCHELL�AVE

ASTORIA AVE

HATHERLEY�RD

FLAMBOROUGH DR

HARDING�AVE

WINSTON PARK BLVD

LONBOROUGH�AVE

THURODALE�AVE

KATHERINE�RD

SELL

ERS�

AVE

WILLIAM CRAGG DR

EUG

ENE�

ST

VIA�CASSIA�DR

HYDE�AVE

RICH

ARD

SON

�AV

E

LAPP�ST

GRA

Y �AV

E

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

DORSEY DR

PAU

L�D

A VID

� ST

NORTHLAND�AVE

LAN

SDO

WN

E�A V

E

YARR

OW

�RD

STEL

LAS

T

LEXF

I EL D

�AV

E MU

RRA

YRD

SNID

ER�A

VE

LIT T

L E�B

LVD

MIR

AN

DA

�AV

E

VENN�CRES

JOCA

DA

�RD

J ASPER AVE

MO

NT C

ALM

�AV

E

REN

FIEL

D�S

T

ING

LESI

DE�

DR

LESTER�AVE

J ULIET CRES

TURNBERRY�AVEUN

ION

�ST

TODD

BAYLISBLVD

WHITLEY�AVE

GRE

END

AL E

�AV

E

AG

ATE�

RD

PRIV

E T� R

D

FAIR

BAN

K�AV

E

CON

NIE

�ST

AN

CAST

ER�R

D

KIRK

NEW

TON

�RD

SAG

E�AV

E

HI L

LDA

LE�R

D

KERSDALE�AVE

KATIE CRT

ROSELAWN�AVE

BERT

RAM

�ST

GLE

NH

AVEN

�ST

DU

VAL�

DR

HA

RTLE

Y �AV

E

TOUCHSTONE�DR

INNES�AVE

DENNIS�AVE

SUMMIT�AVE

ROCKC

L IF F E CRT

LEIG

H�S

T

MARCIA�AVE

NORANDA DR

PHOTOGRAPHYDR

QUINAN�DR

LANGDEN A VE

BEN

TON

�RD

BROME�RD

PA RKCHES T ERRD

BLU

E�SP

RIN

GS�

RD

HOLWOOD�AVE

EVERSFIELD�RD

BROWNVILLE�AVE

MA

IDST

ON

E�ST

LAVENDER�RD

BERTAL RD

MILLENNIUM�DR

IA NHALL RD

HARROW DR

LACE

Y �AV

E

WESTDALE�DR

NASHVILLE�AVE

MAY

O�D

R

TUM

PAN

ES

T

CHA

MBE

RS� A

VE

L AD

Y �YO

R K�A

VE

SPEA

RS�S

T

HILLARY�AVE

HAV

ERSO

NBL

VD

GADE DR

LISCOM

BERD

MILFORD AVE

HOLMESDALE RD

YORK�AVE

BRO

NO

CO� A

VE

IRVING�RD

PLA

TINU

MD

R

BRA

NST

ON

E�RD

CLAY

BRO

OKE

�ST

CLIF

F �S T

BLA

ND

ORM

AN

�RD

CHA

MB E

R LA

IN�A

VE

GRO

TON

� ST

B RY N

�RD

VEERLAND�DR

RODING

ST

ARROWSMITH AVE

HIG

HV

I EW

�AV

E

KING

GEORGES DR

MA

RIA

NFE

LD�A

VE

EUPH

RASI

AD

R

CAN

T ON

�AV

E

KEITH�AVE

MO

NTA

NA

�AV

E

MU

NI C

I PA

LD

R

CLE V

E DO

N� S

T

CORBY�AVE

CRO

HA

M� R

D

ROLLET�DR

BOWIE�AVE

TEIGNMOUTH�AVE

BUSHEY A V E

J ACI NTA DR

PEAREN�ST

BLOEM�AVE

PRES

C OTT

�AV

E

LESWYN�RD

GU

ESTV

I LL E

�AV

E

PAMILLE�PL

MAYBAN

K�AVE

MANGROVE RD

DANT E RD

HAW KIN SD

R

DE

MA

RCO

BLVD

WESTBURY

CRES

ROTHE RHAM AVE

GOTHAM�CRT

WESTACRES�DR

SABL

E�ST

SYM

ES�R

D

JOYCE�PKWY

CENTREPARK�DR

VICTORIA�BLVD

EWART�AVE

SMALLW

OO

DD

R

CRAYDON�AVE

SYNDICATE AVE

DA

LRYM

PLE

DR

KINKORA�DR

HEARST

CRCL

VEN

ICE�

DR

WINTERGREEN�RD

CHA

PPEL

�HI L

L�R D

VAL ENCIA CRES

GA

BIA

N�W

AY

PA

ULSON RD

REDBANK�RD

RED

BERR

Y�PK

WY

GILPIN�AVE

PA

RSO N CRT

RUTHERFORD�AVE

SEA

BRO

OK�

AVE

PRES T ON

RD

PAXTONIA�BLVD

CLEO

�RD

S PR I

NG

VIE

W� A

VE

SPA

RTA

�RD

SENECA�AVE

MONARCHDALE�AVE

WOOLNER�AVE

EPIC

LAN

ERD

HEA

RNE�

AVE

RAMSDEN�RD

WAT

T�AV

E

CAL A

IS�A

VE

LOTH

ERTON PTWY

TEST

ON

� BLV

D

WICKFORD DR

GARSIDE�CRES

WESTCHESTER RD

MA

RTIN

I�DR

DUBRAY AVE

REDF

ERN

�AVE

ALY

WA

RD�S

T

BATTERSEA CRE S

MARSHLYNN�AVE

CHUDLEIGH�RD

KENO

RA CRES

HALLSPORT C RES

ENN

E RD

ALE

� ST

KEYWEST�AVE

NICKLE�ST

ROSECLIFFE�AVE

H ARLTON

CRES

PALA

MAR

�RD

HAW

KSD

ALE

� RD

GLENVALLEY�DR

ROCHDALE�AVE

HUNTER AVE

HAFIS�RD

THORNTON�AVE

WESTCLIFFE RD

FLEE

T WO

OD

�AV

E

HOLLIS�

STLOCUST

�ST

VIA

TORR

ED

R

MAHONEY�AVE

HOLMESDALE CRES

KEEL

ESD

ALE

DR

PEM

BER�

DR

RIDGE POINT CRES

RAITHERM�RD

HILLBORN A VE

VIA�AURELIA�DR

JULI

AN

� RD

BELGRAVIA�AVE

RAINSWOOD CRT

NORDALE CRES

UP WOO D

AVE

BLACKSTON

EST

BOU

RDO

N�A

VE

DONOFR

EERD

SAN

DER

STEA

D�A

VE

COLF

AX�

ST

REG

ENT�

S T

HYS

EL�R

D

L AN

DO

UR �

AVE

LIVINGSTONE AVE

WO

OLT

O

N CRES

ROM

EO�S

T

OLY

MPIA DR

FLAM I

NG

OCR

ES

WHITMORE AVE


CAM

EOCR

ES


BRIDGELAND�AVE

WO

OD

BOROUGH

AVE

GREENT R EE CRT

HOPE WELL AVE

ELH

URS

T�CR

T

CLARKSON�AVE

SOM

ERVILL

E�AVE

DEAKIN�AVE

DEVER ELL

CRES

CAESAR�AVE

SUNNYBRA E CRES

PARA

MOUNT CRT

SORLYN AVE

BLU

EBEL

LG

T

PORTER�AVE

RIDELLE AVE

GRAHAM�RD

MARTIN�ST

AST

RAL�

ST

GIBSON�ST

CIRCLE RIDGE

ARN

OLD

�AV

E

MARSHALL BLVD

MARTHA EA TONW

AY

THE�WISHBONE

CRIPPS�AVE

PITKIN�CRT

CONVENT�CRT

DENARDA�ST

REDHILL�AVE

SHO

RTT�

ST

HELEN�AVE

EDISON�CRCL

BRIE

F�RD

VANWYCK�RD

CIRI

LLO

CRT

YORKTOWN�DR

DARIEN�CRT

NORTHWESTERN�AVE

HOMER�AVE

DORSEY�CRT

OXFORD�D

R

ROWAN�AVE

CARRINGTON�AVE

FOX�POINT

BERR

YTO

N�A

VE

LOO

KOU

T�PL


PRA

DO

�CRT

WEL

DO

N�C

RT

NO

RCRE

ST�D

R AM

BER�CRE S

RICA

RDO

�RD

EWART�AVE

AILEEN�AVE

SCHELL�AVE

SCHELL�AVE

BOWIE�AVE

ENN

ERD

ALE

�ST

NA

IRN

AV

E

CLIF

F�ST

MIR

AN

DA

�AV

E

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

HA

RVIE

� AV

E

GIL

BERT

�AV

E

KEEL

E�ST

SPEA

RSST

GU

E STV

I LL E

�AV

E

MCR

OBE

RTS �

AVE

JOYCE�PKWYBLA

CK

THO

RNA

VE

CORN

ELIU

S�PK

WY

LAN

SDO

WN

E�AV

E

DONALD AVE

BENTWORTH�AVE

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

CLIF

F �S T

JOYCE�PKWY

St�Matthew

St�Fidelis

St�Bernard

Santa�Maria

Regina�Mundi

St�John�Bosco

St�Philip�Neri





Scenario��Boundar��Descriptions

E

0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.40.3Kilometres

Prepared�by:�TCDSB�Planning�ServicesMay�2013

St.�Francis�Xavier�Boundary Immaculate�Conception�BoundarySt.�Fidelis�BoundaryNorth�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres,�Culford�Rd,�George�Anderson�Dr,�Keele�St,�Colville�Rd,�between�lot�lines�83�Colville�Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd


South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Eglinton�Ave�W

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�Black�Creek�Dr

North�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�2�28�(even)�&�38�92�(even)�Beckett�Ave,�between�lot�92�&�94�Beckett�Ave,�between�lot�68�&�70�Falstaff�Ave,�rear�lot�line�89�Springview�Ave,�Highway�401


South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Queens�Dr,�Black�Creek�River,�Lawrence�Ave�W,�Black�Creek�Dr,�East�lot�line�253�259�(odd)�Gracefield�Ave,�South�lot�line�53,�54�Arkwright�St,�South�lot�line�213�221�(odd)�Gracefield�Ave,�Gracefield�Ave,Culford�Rd,�Queen's�GreenBelt�Trail,�West�and�North�lotline�2500�Keele�St,�Keele�St,�South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St,rear�lot�lines�9�63�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�lines�6,7,5,3Lookout�Place,�93�97�&�103�107�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�line�17�Edison�Cir,�rear�lot�line�587�Rustic�Rd

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�Jane�St


Expressway

Major Roads

Local Roads

Parks

St. Fidelis

St. Francis Xavier


North�Boundary�(West�to�East):�South�lot�line�53,�54�Arkwright�St,�South�lot�line�213�221�(odd)�Gracefield�Ave,�Gracefield�Ave,Culford�Rd,�Queen's�Greenbelt�Trail,�West�and�North�lot�line�2500�Keele�St,�Keele�St,�South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St,�rear�lot�lines�9�63�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�lines�6,7,5,3�Lookout�Place,�93�97�&�103�107�(odd)�Cornelius�Pky,�rear�lot�line�17�Edison�Cir,�rear�lot�line�587�Rustic�Rd


South�Boundary�(West�to�East):�Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres,�Culford�Rd,�George�Anderson�Dr,�Keele�St,�Colville�Rd,�between�lot�lines�83�Colville�Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd

West�Boundary�(North�to�South):�East�lot�line�253�259�(odd)Gracefield�Ave,�Black�Creek�Dr




C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

KEEL

E�ST

South�lot�line�2505�Keele�St






JAN

E�ST

JAN

E�ST

BLACK

BLACK�CREEK�DR GEORGE�ANDERSON�DR

BLACK�CREEK�D

R

Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres

CULFORD�RDBetween�lot�lines�83�Colville�

Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd

CREEK RIVER

EGLINTON�AVE�W


COLVILLE�RD

KEEL

E�ST

QUEENS�DR

GRACEFIELD�AVE

CULF

ORD

�RD

LAWRENCE�AVE�W

BELT��TRAILQUEEN'S GREEN

West�and�North�lotline�2500�Keele�St

East�lot�line�253�259�(odd)Gracefield�Ave

South�lot�line�53,�54�Arkwright�St,�South�lot�line�213�221�(odd)�Gracefield�Ave

'A-2'Page 41 of 263

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

KEEL

E�ST

CALE

DO

NIA

RD

DU

FFER

INST

WESTO

NRD

JAN

E�ST

ROGERS RD

LAWRENCE�AVE�W

ST�CLAIR�AVE�W

BLACKCREEK

DR

EGLINTON AVE W

TRETHEWEY DR

OLD

WESTO

NRD

GU LLIVER RD INGRAM�DR

BRIDGELAND�AVE

YORE�RD

KEEL

E �S T

RUSTIC�RD

CULF

ORD

�RD

FALSTAFF�AVE

QUEENS�DR

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

JAY�

ST

KAN

E�AV

E

NA

I RN

�AV

E

S ILV

ERTH

OR N

� AV

E

BOO

N�A

VE

SCO

TT�R

D

TYCOS�DR

HA

RVI E

�AV

ECASTLEFIELD�AVE

NO

RTH

CLI F

FE� B

LVD

ERIE

�ST

GI L

BERT

�AV

E

GRACEFIELD�AVE

PLAYFAIR�AVE

ORFUS�RD

WES

TMO

UN

T �AV

E

DOWNSVIEW�AVE

UN

ION

�ST

AVON

�AVE

BURR�AVE

ROCK

CLI F

FE�B

LVD

DAY

�AV

E

HOPE�ST

EARL

SCO

URT

� AV

E

BICK

NEL

L�A V

E

LAMBTON�AVE

GLEN�PARK�AVE

WYNDALE�DR

GLENCAIRN�AVE

INDUSTRY�ST

RON

ALD

�AV

E

BLA

CKTH

ORN

�AV

E

MA

CLEO

D�S

T

ENN

ERD

ALE

�RD

RAY�AVE

SHEF

FIEL

D�S

T

DUNRAVEN�DR

RAVEN�RD

ALLIANCE�AVE

TERRY�DR

GLEN�LONG�AVE

DU

FFL A

W�R

D

BECKETT�AVE

CAMERON�AVE

ANTHONY�RD

ASCOT�AVE

CORN

ELIU

S�PK

WY

FLORAL�PKWY

BRO

OKH

AV

END

R

CARTWRIGHT�AVE

SELL

ERS�

AVE

R OS E

THO

RN�A

VE

SYMES�RD

AILEEN�AVE

COMAY�RD

GREENBROOK DR

WINGOLD�AVE

COLVILLE�RD

GLENGROVE�AVE

CLEARVIEW�HTS

YORE�RD

LAWNSIDE�DR

GROVEDALE�AVE

MCR

OBE

RTS�

A VE

VIELLA�ST

DEL�RIA�DR

AM

ESBU

RY�D

R

DENSLEY�AVE

YPRES�RD

MCCORMACK ST

APE

X�RD

KEEL

E �S T

KITCHENER AVE

CORDELLA�AVE

CAYUGA�AVE

DONALD�AVE

RORY�RD

BENTWORTH�AVE

TROWELL�AVE

HAV

EN�R

D

STRATHNAIRNA

VE

KIN

COR T

� ST

SAMOR�RD

NORTH PARK DR

HUMBER�BLV

D

DYN

EVO

R �R D

TE D

DE R

ST

TREE

LAW

NPK

WY

SCHELL�AVE

ASTORIA AVE

HATHERLEY�RD

GU

NNS RD

MORRISON�AVE

FLAMBOROUGH DR

HARDING�AVE

HENRIETTA�ST

LONBOROUGH�AVE

THURODALE�AVE

EUG

ENE�

ST

VIA�CASSIA�DRHYDE�AVE

RICH

ARD

SON

�AV

E

LAPP�ST

GRA

Y �AV

E

GEORGE ANDERSON DR

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

DORSEY DR

PAU

L�D

A VID

� ST

NORTHLAND�AVE

LAN

SDO

WN

E�A V

E

YARR

OW

�RD

RID

GE�

RD

STEL

LAS

T

SNID

ER�A

VE

LIT T

L E�B

LVD

MIR

AN

DA

�AV

E

VENN�CRES

JOCA

DA

�RD

ROCKWELL�AVE

J ASPER AVE

MO

ULD

�AV

E

MO

NT C

ALM

�AV

E

REN

FIEL

D�S

T

LESTER�AVE

J ULIET CRES

TURNBERRY�AVE

PRES

C OTT

�AV

E

TODD

BAYLISBLVD

WHITLEY�AVE

GRE

END

AL E

�AV

E

ROWNTREE�AVE

FAIR

BAN

K�AV

E

CON

NIE

�ST

KIRK

NEW

TON

�RD

SAG

E�AV

E

HI L

LDA

LE�R

D

KERSDALE�AVE

KATIE CRT

ROSELAWN�AVE

BERT

RAM

�ST

GLE

NH

AVEN

�ST

DU

VAL�

DR

HA

RTLE

Y �AV

E

TOUCHSTONE�DR

INNES�AVE

DENNIS�AVE

SUMMIT�AVE

ROCKC

L IF F E CRT

LEIG

H�S

T

MARCIA�AVE

NORANDA DR

PHOTOGRAPHYDR

QUINAN�DR

LANGDEN A VE

BEN

TON

�RD

BROME�RD

PA RKCHES T ERRD

BLU

E�SP

RIN

GS�

RD

HOLWOOD�AVE

EVERSFIELD�RD

BROWNVILLE�AVE

MA

IDST

ON

E�ST

LAVENDER�RD

BERTAL RD

MILLENNIUM�DR

HARROW DR

LACE

Y �AV

E

WESTDALE�DR

NASHVILLE�AVE

MAY

O�D

R

HOWICK�AVE

GLEN�SCARLETT�RD

SPEA

RS�S

T

HILLARY�AVE

HAV

ERSO

NBL

VD

CAST

LETO

N� A

VE

LISCOM

BERD

MILFORD AVE

HOLMESDALE RD

YORK�AVE

BRO

NO

CO� A

VE

IRVING�RD

PLA

TINU

MD

R

BRA

NST

ON

E�RD

CLAY

BRO

OKE

�ST

CLIF

F �S T

BLA

ND

ORM

AN

�RD

CHA

MB E

R LA

IN�A

VE

GRO

TON

� ST

B RY N

�RD

VEERLAND�DR

ARROWSMITH AVE

KING

GEORGES DR

MA

RIA

NFE

LD�A

VE

EUPH

RASI

AD

R

KEITH�AVE

ING

LESI

DE�

DR

MU

NI C

I PA

LD

R

PRI V

E T�R

D

CHA

MBE

RS� A

VE

CORBY�AVE

CRO

HA

M�R

D

ROLLET�DR

BOWIE�AVE

TEIGNMOUTH�AVE

BUSHEY A V E

J ACI NTA DR

PEAREN�ST

BLOEM�AVE

LESWYN�RD

GU

ESTV

I LL E

�AV

E

PAMILLE�PL

MAYBAN

K�AVE

MANGROVE RD

DA

NTE

RD

HAW KIN SD

R

DE

MA

RCO

BLVD

WESTBURY

CRES

ROTHE RHAM AVE

GOTHAM�CRT

WESTACRES�DR

SABL

E�ST

JOYCE�PKWY

ST�C

LAI R

�GD

NS

CENTREPARK�DR

VICTORIA�BLVD

NORMAN�AVE

EWART�AVE

CORBETT�AVE

CRAYDON�AVE

SYNDICATE AVE

DA

LRYM

PLE

DR

KINKORA�DR

HEARST

CRCL

VEN

ICE�

DR

L AD

Y �Y O

RK�A

VE

NO

RTH

GAT

E�D

R

VAL ENCIA CRES

GA

BIA

N�W

AY

PA

ULSON RD

REDBANK�RD

RED

BERR

Y�PK

WY

GILPIN�AVE

PARSO N CRT

RUTHERFORD�AVE

SEA

BRO

OK�

AVE

PRES T ON

RD

GOODWOOD�AVE

HIG

HV

I EW

�AV

E

CLEO

�RD

SPA

RTA

�RD

SENECA�AVE

MONARCHDALE�AVE

WOOLNER�AVE

TOWNSLEY�ST

HEA

RNE�

AVE

RAMSDEN�RD

ROYA

L �ST

WAT

T�AV

E

LOTH

ERTON PTWY

BLA

KLEY

�AV

E

PRITCHARD�AVE

TEST

ON

� BLV

D

WICKFORD DR

GARSIDE�CRES

WESTCHESTER RD

MA

RTIN

I�DR

ALY

WA

RD�S

T

BATTERSEA CRE S

MARSHLYNN�AVE

CRIS

COE�

ST

CHUDLEIGH�RD

KEN

ORA CRES

ENN

ERD

ALE

� ST

KEYWEST�AVE

NICKLE�ST

ROSECLIFFE�AVE

H ARLTON

CRES

GLENVALLEY�DR

ROCHDALE�AVE

HUNTER AVE

HAFIS�RD

LIVERPOOL�ST

RAV

ENA

L�S T

THORNTON�AVE

NORTON�AVE

NO

RVA

L �S T

FLEE

TWO

OD

�AV

E

HOLLIS�

STLOCUST

�ST

VIA

TORR

EDR

MAHONEY�AVE

HOLMESDALE CRES

KEEL

ESD

ALE

DR

PEM

BER�

DR

RIDGE POINT CRES

RAITHERM�RD

HILL BORN A VE

VIA�AURELIA�DR

PRYOR�AVE

BELGRAVIA�AVE

RAINSWOOD�CRT

NORDALE CRES

U P WOO DAVE

BLACKSTON

EST

BOU

RDO

N�A

VE

WIN

STO

N�P

ARK

�BLV

D

BRICKWO

RKSLA

NE

DONOFR

EERD

SAN

DER

STEA

D�A

VE

COLF

AX�

ST

REG

ENT�

S T

HYS

EL�R

D

L AN

DO

UR �

AVE

LIVINGSTONE AVE

WO

OLT

O

N CRES

ROM

EO�S

T

OLY

MPIA DR

FLAM I

NG

OCR

ES

WHITMORE AVE


CAM

EOCR

ES


BRIDGELAND�AVE

WO

OD

BOROUGH

AVE

BAN

NER

MA

N�S

T

GREENT R EE CRT

HOPE WELL AVE

HA

GA

RA

VE

ASHTON�AVE

ELH

URS

T�CR

T

CLARKSON�AVE

SOM

ERVILL

E�AVE

DEAKIN�AVE

DEVER ELL

CRES

CAESAR�AVE

SUNNYBRA E CRES

KING ST

PARA

MOUNT CRT

SORLYN AVE

OSC

AR�

ROM

ERO

�PL

BLU

EBEL

L�G

T

PORTER�AVE

RIDELLE AVE

GRAHAM�RD

LANTOS CRT

MARTIN�ST

AST

RAL�

ST

AR K

WRI

GH

T�ST

GIBSON�ST

CIRCLE RIDGE

ARN

OLD

�AV

E

R UN

NYM

EDE�

RD

MARSHALL BLVD

MARTHA EA TONW

AY

BRIT

AN

NIA

�AV

E

THE�WISHBONE

CRIPPS�AVE

LAMBERT�AVE

PITKIN�CRT

CONVENT�CRT

DENARDA�ST

REDHILL�AVE

SHO

RTT�

ST

EDISON�CRCL

BRIE

F�RD

VANWYCK�RD

CIRI

LLO

CRT

YORKTOWN�DR

DARIEN�CRT

NORTHWESTERN�AVE

HOMER�AVE

DORSEY�CRT

OXFORD�D

R

ROWAN�AVE

CARRINGTON�AVE

FOX�POINT

BERR

YTO

N�A

VE

LOO

KOU

T�PL


PRA

DO

�CRT

WEL

DO

N�C

RT

NO

RCRE

ST�D

R

GRIEVES�AVE

AM

BER�CRE S

RICA

RDO

�RD

JOYCE�PKWY

GU

ESTV

I LL E

�AV

E

GIL

B ER T

� AV

E

CLIF

F �S T

BLA

CKT

HO

RNA

VE

CLIF

F�ST

ENN

ERD

ALE

�ST

BENTWORTH�AVE

NA

IRN

AV

E

EWART�AVE

AILEEN�AVE

SCHELL�AVEM

IRA

ND

A�A

VE

LAN

SDO

WN

E�AV

E

HA

RVIE

� AV

EGLE

NH

AVEN

�ST

BOWIE�AVE

SYM

ES�R

D

JOYCE�PKWY

MAPLE�LEAF�DR

CHIS

WIC

K�AV

E

PRES

COTT

�AV

E

CHA

MBE

RS�A

VE

MCR

OBE

RTS �

AVE

KEEL

E�ST

DONALD AVE

SCHELL�AVE

SPEA

RSST

BLAC

KTH

ORN

AV

E

St�Clare

St�Fidelis

St�Bernard

St�Matthew

Santa�Maria

Regina�Mundi

St�John�Bosco

St�Philip�Neri





Stella�Maris

Scenario�2��Boundary�Descriptions

E

0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.40.3KilometresPrepared�by:�TCDSB�Planning�Services

Jan�2014




C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

C�N

�R�R

AIL

WAY

North�lot�line�2505�Keele�St






JAN

E�ST

JAN

E�ST

BLACK�CREEK�DRBLA

CK�CREEK�DR

BLACK CREEK

EGLINTON�AVE�W


QUEENS�DR


Expressway

Major Roads

Local Roads

Parks

St. Fidelis

St. Francis Xavier


HIGHWAY�400

CULF

ORD

�RD

Rear�lot�lines�1�19�(odd)�Ridge�Point�Cres

CULFORD�RD Between�lot�lines�83�Colville�Rd�&�21�Benton�Rd

COLVILLE�RD

BLACK�CREEK�DR

Rear�lot�line�236�248�(even)�Gracefield�Ave,�

rear�lot�line�66,�68�(even)Arkwright�St

Rear�lot�line�65,�67�Arkwright�St,rear�lot�line�182�222(even)�Gracefield�Ave,

rear�lot�line�8�12(even)�Bluebell�Gt,�Queens�Dr,east�lot�line�549�Queens�Dr

Rear�lot�line�9,7,5�Bluebell�Gt,�rear�lot�line�553�567(odd)�

Queens�Dr,�Culford�Rd

QUEENS�DR BELT��TRAILQUEEN'S GREEN

Rear�lot�line�108,�102,�76�94�(even)�

George�Anderson�Dr

Rear�lot�line�64�68(even)�George�Anderson�Dr

Rear�lot�line�42�56(even)George�Anderson�Dr

West�&�North�lot�line�of30�George�Anderson�Dr,

South�lot�line�2368�Keele�Ave

Option: Boundary�Scenario�2

IMMACULATE�CONCEPTION Portables Capacity 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Pupil�Count 0 529 440 465 486 494 530 538 553 571 586 615 599 596 593 590 587

Rate�of�Utilization�(%) 83% 88% 92% 93% 100% 102% 105% 108% 111% 116% 113% 113% 112% 112% 111%

ST�FIDELIS Portables Capacity 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Pupil�Count 6 369 599 611 628 638 645 649 649 658 665 662 674 670 667 664 661

Rate�of�Utilization�(%) 162% 166% 170% 173% 175% 176% 176% 178% 180% 179% 183% 182% 181% 180% 179%

Rate�of�Utilization�(%)*Assumes�capital�improvement�to�increase�capacity�to�658�in�2017

658 91% 93% 95% 97% 98% 99% 99% 100% 101% 101% 102% 102% 101% 101% 100%

ST�FRANCIS�XAVIER Portables Capacity 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Pupil�Count 1 524 515 517 526 550 575 593 625 621 627 613 618 615 613 610 607

Rate�of�Utilization�(%) 98% 99% 100% 105% 110% 113% 119% 119% 120% 117% 118% 117% 117% 116% 116%'A-3'Page 42 of 263

POLICY SECTION: STUDENT

SUB-SECTION: ADMISSIONS AND PLACEMENT

POLICY NAME: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY POLICY

POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 1 of 6

Date Approved: Date of Review: Dates of Amendment: October 18, 2012 - Board April 28, 2010 - Board

Cross Reference: • S.A. 01, Admission Policy• S.T. 01, Transportation Policy

Policy

The Director of Education may prepare a report for consideration by the Board identifying a school, or group of schools, facing programming challenges and/or facility limitations due to enrolment oversubscription or under subscription, and in respect of which there may be a need to consider and review the possible implementation of boundaries in respect of one or more of the identified schools.

Regulations

1. An attendance boundary review shall be initiated by the community, the Director ofEducation or Board staff through a submission of a formal request to the Board ofTrustees compliant with Board procedures, or through a recommendation by Board staff.

2. The Director of Education shall set a limit on the total number of attendance boundaryreviews conducted per year, dependent upon availability of appropriate staff resources,and reserves the right to prioritize the requests for reviews.

3. The Board reserves the right to aggregate individual requests for boundary reviewsdepending on the geographic location of the schools being considered for review.

4. Fixed attendance boundaries must employ an open, public consultative process similar tothe process used in School Accommodation Review, whereby a Boundary ReviewCommittee (BRC) consisting of parents/guardians, educators and Board officials isestablished.

For the school(s) which is(are) the subject of an attendance boundary review, and for anyof the neighbouring schools included in the boundary review with the potential of being

"B-1"Page 43 of 263




POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 2 of 6

impacted and which may have a previously approved fixed attendance boundary, membership on the BRC shall include:

• Trustee;

• School Superintendent;

• Principal or designate;

• One parent representative;

• CSAC Chair or designate;

• One student representative;

• Pastor; and

• Community representative.

5. The BRC will be deemed to be properly constituted provided that a majority of membersare present. Quorum shall be established if a majority of the members of the Committeeare present.

6. The Director shall appoint a Principal who does not represent the area under study asChair of the BRC.

7. The School Superintendent shall identify the members of the BRC and formally inviteeach of them to participate on the BRC. The School Superintendent(s), or delegate(s),shall function as secretary of the BRC as well as in a resource capacity.

8. The BRC shall seek input on boundary configuration options, and shall hold publicengagement consisting of a minimum of two and a maximum of four public meetings.These meetings shall be open to the public, and advance notice shall be provided by theBRC consistent with the Community Engagement Policy.

a. The BRC shall ensure that a wide range of school and community groups areconsulted, such as school councils, parents/guardians, school staff/administration,students, and the local community.

"B-2"Page 44 of 263




POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 3 of 6

b. After the Board has approved and announced a boundary review, a minimum of30 days must be allowed prior to the first public meeting.

c. The public consultation period shall be a minimum of 30 days, beginning with thefirst public meeting.

d. Extended school holidays such as spring and summer break, Easter, Thanksgivingand Christmas, shall not be considered part of the minimum 30 day publicconsultation period.

9. Administrative staff shall be made available throughout the consultation process toprovide the necessary expertise and resources. This shall include staff from the Planningand Facilities Superintendency, as well as representation from the Toronto StudentTransportation Group.

10. The BRC shall ensure that all information relevant to the attendance boundary review ismade public and available in advance of public meetings, both electronically and in printform. This information will also be posted to the Board website and other appropriatevenues such as libraries, parishes, etc.

11. The BRC shall be provided with all relevant data in the possession of the Board in orderto carry out its mandate, including the following:

a. Maps of the area;b. Current enrolment data and demographic projections by program;c. Maps and information on transportation;d. School profile data, including capacities for each school under study.

12. The BRC shall ensure that all information that is technical in nature be provided andexplained in plain language.

13. The BRC shall keep detailed notes or minutes reflecting the full range of boundaryoptions expressed at public meeting(s) and shall make these minutes available to thepublic.

14. The BRC shall ensure that there is a process in place to respond to questions raised at themeeting(s) which could not be answered at the meeting(s).

"B-3"Page 45 of 263




POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 4 of 6

15. A full transportation modeling study shall be undertaken by the Board to determine theimpacts of a fixed attendance boundary on schools and students, and to determineassociated costs to the Board. The results of the study will be provided to the BRC.

16. Board staff shall prepare boundary configuration option(s) for consideration by the BRC.These will be provided to members of the BRC prior to the first public meeting.

17. The BRC shall prepare a report detailing their preferred attendance boundaryconfiguration option(s), along with recommendation(s), and submit the report to theDirector of Education for review. The completed report shall be made available to thepublic. The BRC report must take the following into consideration:

a. Fixed attendance boundaries must be designed to follow logical and easilyidentifiable routes and/or physical landforms where possible, such as major roads,rail-lines, watercourses, parklands, ravines, and established political boundaries.

b. Fixed attendance boundaries must be constructed in such a fashion that schoolsaffected by the imposition of a nearby fixed attendance boundary benefit to thefullest extent possible, both in terms of maximizing student enrolment andutilization of available classroom space.

c. Program offerings (e.g. French Immersion, Gifted, etc.) must be taken intoconsideration when developing boundaries, and as such, there could be more thanone boundary associated with any given school(s) under review.

18. After receiving the BRC’s report and boundary recommendations, the Director ofEducation shall prepare a report for consideration by the Board of Trustees in publicsession at a regularly scheduled meeting, regarding the BRC’s recommendations, as wellas staff comments and recommendations.

19. The Director of Education’s report shall be made publicly available and posted on theBoard’s website in advance of the Board of Trustees’ meeting at which it is to beconsidered.

20. Opportunity for public input regarding the BRC’s report and the Director of Education’sreport shall be provided at a subsequent meeting of the Board of Trustees, which willhear and receive delegations as well as consider written submissions.

"B-4"Page 46 of 263




POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 5 of 6

21. The Director of Education shall prepare a further report for consideration by the Board ofTrustees in public session, regarding and responding to public input received andrepresentations made at the previous Board meeting.

22. The Board of Trustees shall make a decision with regard to the boundary of the school(s)included in the attendance boundary review at a regularly scheduled meeting and shallnotify the school community(ies) in writing of the Board’s decision, and shall have thedecision posted on the Board’s website.

23. The final approved boundary map shall be distributed to the local City Councillor, locallibrary, other community agencies, the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB), through theArchdiocese to the parishes, maintained on the Board website and the profile of theschool.

24. Any decision by the Board of Trustees to implement a fixed attendance boundary shall beplanned for and implemented no sooner than the following school year.

25. Subject to the Board’s Admissions Policy (S.A.01), a student must have primaryresidence within the established fixed attendance boundary to qualify for admission to theschool. All other students outside the fixed attendance boundary may apply to be placedon a wait list, and may be granted admission at the discretion of the Board where spacepermits.

26. If requests exceed available space, subject to TCDSB Admissions Policy (S.A. 01), wait-listed students will be admitted based on date of wait-list application, subject to thefollowing priorities:

Priority 1: Students whose primary residence is situated within the fixed attendanceboundary of the requested school.

Priority 2: Student attending licensed childcare, including licensed home childcare, within the fixed attendance boundary of the requested school.

Priority 3: Students receiving childcare within the fixed attendance boundary of the requested school.

Priority 4: Students resident in the City of Toronto.

Priority 5: Students resident outside the City of Toronto.

"B-5"Page 47 of 263




POLICY NO: S.A. 03

Page 6 of 6

Student transportation will be provided in accordance with the Board’s Transportation Policy.

27. Students who have siblings already in the requested school and expected to be in theschool for the next school year shall gain admission.

"B-6"Page 48 of 263

Boundary Review Meeting Minutes Madonna Auditorium

February 4, 2014 – 7:00pm

In Attendance: Committee Members in Attendance:

Gina Iuliano Marrello, Sal Piccininni, Barbara Leporati, David Palster , Stephen Dempsey, Adele , Carmela Ferri, Toni Ruscitto-Daddario, Micahel Caccamo, Pat Pacchiarotti, Rosa Tucci

Councillor DiGiorgio, Laura Albanese and their representatives

Chair: Erica Wilson, Principal Madonna SS

Regrets: Judy Onody, Pat Lanni

AGENDA ITEM Discussion Recommendations/Next Steps

PRAYER

- led by: Erica Power

“Year of Faith, Hope and Charity” Prayer

Opening Greetings

Erica Wilson

-Greetings and well wishes

- “World Cancer Day” – recognized

-Virtue of the Month – Love

-Introductions – Committee Representatives

APPENDIX 'C'Page 49 of 263

Outline of Agenda for the evening

Gina Iuliano Marrello -Welcome and greetings

-Overview of Steering Committee (BRC) -Overview of Process

Planning Department

David Palster

-Explanation of Boundary Review: -Grandfathering of children already registered in schools -Does not affect students already registered -explanation of current existing boundaries

Starting Point: -existing boundaries, and impact of keeping these boundaries from Kindergarten to Grade 8; -discussed projections for enrolment across 3 schools until 2027 -St. Fidelis is choice for capital improvement due to these numbers; on the books for some time -St. Francis Xavier will eventually increase to approx. 146% capacity

First Proposed Scenario: (Scenario 2) -Immaculate Conception remain unchanged -St. Fidelis pans out at about 100% -St. Francis Xavier balances out at about 115%

By increasing St. Fidelis boundary, this adjusts St. Francis Xavier’s enrolment and St. Fidelis enrolment to approx. 100%

Second Proposed Scenario: (Scenario 3) -this scenario was created by request from BRC -this scenario increases the enrolment at Immaculate Conception and St.


Francis Xavier to over 100% each

Scenario 3A: -slight adjustment to some residents that are St. Xavier in Scenario 3 to include them into St. Fidelis catchment

-Overview of Scenarios -right-sizing school justifies capital improvement required at St. Fidelis

Boundary Review binder is now public and online: www.tcdsb.org/Board/PlanningandFacilities/BoundaryReview/Pages/default.aspx

Erica Power -Thanks David for his presentation

-Opens the floor to questions

Questions:

Parent at St. FX

Question: -Construction at St. Fidelis will be disruptive -where will the students go while the construction is going on? - students will need to leave the property -are the numbers of the displaced students included in the numbers of other schools in these scenarios?

Answer: -Yes, the plan is awaiting Ministry Approval to move forward. -explains the Business request process through the Ministry -St. Fidelis is number 4 on the list -Boundary Review is dependent on capital development -approvals and monies have already been approved for an expansion, so a


http://www.tcdsb.org/Board/PlanningandFacilities/BoundaryReview/Pages/default.aspx


plan is in place as a back-up

-too early in the process to determine where the students will go and what type of capital development will take place -this summer FDK retrofitting will still take place to fulfil Ministry requirements -the enrolment numbers are not vastly different in the scenarios as they currently exist at St. Fidelis -these numbers are satisfied because of portables; intention is to eliminate portables

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: St. Fidelis is already tight. How are we proposing a larger boundary if we don’t have a school for it, and there are a lot of “ifs” in building a new school? There is a problem with driving into the school and dropping of children.

Answer: -Some portables are meant also as a back-up plan in the event retrofitting is not complete -plan is also to leave portables for future enrolment, so facilities does not need to go in two portables at a time -this is a gradual increase in numbers -this is over time and not immediate impact

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: Problem right now at that St. Fidelis is that many students live outside of catchment area. This is part of the problem. Creating boundaries will help balance out numbers. This will enable schools to say to parents register at your school. Boundary Review is a good thing for this community. Schools are made up of parents, children, and teachers. Parents are going


to the school with the most kids. That’s not what schools are about.

Parent at St. FX Question: There is zero enforcement currently in enrolment for students in these schools. I know of families that are not in the area who currently attend certain schools. I don’t think boundaries are helpful because these are not being enforced.

Answer: -Process outlined for registering -explanation of FDK Boundaries, Transportation Boundaries, Grades 1-8 Boundaries, etc. -boundary enforcement is in place and schools are working hard at enforcing them

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: -Could the new school end up outside the current boundary of St. Fidelis?

Answer: -highly unlikely scenario

Parent at St. FX Question: I am concerned that many residents will not want their child living through a renovation, and will try to enrol in the closest school. This will leave St. FX with oversubscription and more portables. That is what is happening now with St. John the Evangelist and St. FX enrolment. I am concerned that St. FX will end up overloaded and then when everyone moves back to their newly built school St. FX will end up with nothing.

Answer:


-Plans are made ahead to try to avoid these scenarios from happening. Parent at St. FX Question:

-If St. Fidelis is approved for a new school, what happens to the students at this site? I want to know what the plan is – there must have been discussion about this.

Answer: -We do meet and plan ahead. We review schools that are available for sale and leasing, but we need to wait for approval because even in two months these schools may change.

Parent at St. Fidelis Point of Clarification: -When a Boundary is reached through this process, my understanding is that the students at St. Fidelis, who wish not to be moved to another school during the construction, will not be able to transfer to any school they choose. These boundaries will now be enforced.

Answer: That is correct. They will not be able to move to one of the other schools.

Gina We are looking at all three communities equally, and not just St. Fidelis at this Boundary Review.

Parent at St. FX Question: Is there the possibility to consider placing grade 7 &8 students in another site from all three schools, and keep the elementary schools at K-6 only?

Answer -this fragments school communities -this is not the direction the Board is going -everything is a possibility though, and the question can be brought


forward to the Board and discussed

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: How many schools on average are selected yearly for capital development?

Answer: -We give our eight, the Ministry reviews the business cases and the selection varies

Parent at St. Fidelis Question When will St. John the Evangelist be completed?

Answer: -We are in a phase that requires some land ownership -This will need to be addressed first

Parent at St. Fidelis Question How did you arrive at these projected numbers?

Answer: -Based on Catholic School supporters -very high catholic supporters in west-end of Toronto

Parent at St. FX Question I don’t think the St. Fidelis School community should worry about the Board rebuilding the school outside of the current area. They will do their best to ensure it remains in the area. They wouldn’t go through this process (Boundary Review) to just move the school out.

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: Why are we planning boundaries now when there is no school?


Answer: We need to plan ahead because boundaries take time to right-size the school. 60 JK students equal 600 students in the end. We need time for the boundaries to take effect. We also need to project/plan for how many classes we will need.

Parent at St. FX Question: My neighbourhood has many older Italian families. The new families coming into the neighbourhood don’t yet have children. When they do, has the planning committee thought about this?

Answer: Yes. The numbers support these changes in community.

Laura Albanese Explains the situation at St. John the Evangelist and the process that led up to the new location, the building of the school, etc.

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: Once the Ministry makes a decision and approves a decision, have they and would they ever claw-back on a decision.

Answer -Have not seen this actually happen; probably not a good political move considering it is for Education -Anything is possible, but most likely what might happen is more additional proposals would not be accepted

Parent at St. Fidelis Question Once a decision is made, how long before the community would be notified?

Answer:


The whole community would know by the next CSAC meeting. Parent at St. Fidelis Question:

Once the site is approved for a new school, how long before we know if the current site is considered? Will it be August?

Answer: The team will meet and then make a recommendation.

Gina Iuliano Marrello Encouraged to take back the information from the evening and to think about the information provided.

Frank DiGiorgio Only viable option if you are to increase the population of St. Fidelis is to build a new school on a new site. St. FX is a bigger site, but that is not the site being considered for this renewal.

Sal P. We are currently looking on a lot of different things we can’t discuss at this time. Staff is working on it. All levels of government involved –Laura, Frank, etc.Some of the plans are exciting, but not for sure at this point in time.

Parent at St. FX Question: Why don’t we build for 1000? Make a super school?

Answer: Super schools don’t work; -600 students is a good size; examples provided.

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: Overcapacity has always been a problem at St. Fidelis. This process and


Boundary Review is a waste of time.

Answer: -Thank you, your comments have been noted.

Parent at St. FX Question: Gracefield and Amesbury Elementary schools are well under capacity and have the largest property in the neighbourhood. I would hope that these schools have been looked at as options. Are there conversations with other Boards, can we just ask?

Answer: We (Planning and Facilities, and Capital) are always looking and in constant contact with other Boards. -A Board must declare a school surplus to its needs in order to be available for lease or sale. -We can’t just ask; it doesn’t work that way -will include this suggestion in minutes.

Chair -Reposted boundaries and scenarios on screen -projected enrolment reposted -web address reposted

Laura Albanese Question: How are parents voting or making comments about this process?

Answer: -This is the forum and the opportunity -Parents can submit to CSAC or Principals and these will be forwarded to BRC for their minutes -the process of submitting recommendation from BRC is outlined


Gina Iuliano Marrello and Erica Wilson

Thank committee members, panels (Planning & Facilities, Capital), parents, and audience for their participation and attendance.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 8:42pm

Next Meeting: TBA

Chaminade SS


Boundary Review Meeting Minutes Chaminade Library

March 18, 2014 – 7:00pm

In Attendance: Committee Members in Attendance:

Gina Iuliano Marrello, Sal Piccininni, Barbara Leporati, David Paltser , Stephen Dempsey, Adele (Parent- St. Francis Xavier) , Parent (Immaculate Conception), Carmela Ferri, Toni Ruscitto-Daddario, Micahel Caccamo, Pat Pacchiarotti (Parent – St. Fidelis, Pat. Lanni (Parent – St. Fidelis), Rosa Tucci, Councillor DiGiorgio, Laura Albanese, Ivana (Parent -St. Francis Xavier)

Chair: Carmine Settino, Principal Chaminade SS

Regrets:

AGENDA ITEM Discussion Recommendations/Next Steps

Opening Greetings:

Carmine Settino

-Greetings and well wishes

-Introductions – BRC Committee Representatives

PRAYER

- led by Gina Iuliano Marrello

“A Prayer for Visioning”

Gina Iuliano Marrello -Welcome and greetings

-Overview of Steering Committee (BRC)


-Overview of Process -Overview of reasoning behind boundary changes proposed

-Grandfathering of children already registered in schools -Does not affect students already registered -explanation of current existing boundaries

-reminds parents and community members present that the meeting is about the boundary review for all three schools, and encourages the discussion to remain focussed on this topic

-Outline of Agenda for the evening presented -distributes copies of proposed and FDK boundary

Distribution of Boundary Maps

Time given for participants to review and discuss freely among themselves and the members of the committee

Planning Department

David Paltser

-Explanation of Boundary Review: -explains that several models were initially considered - details the criteria and pupil yield used to develop plans and proposed boundaries for all three schools

-Displays “Status Quo” boundary maps and projected enrolment numbers -Discusses enrolment numbers and their significance over the years (until 2027)

Scenario 1 - Boundary Map discussed in details - Boundaries change slightly between St. Fidelis and St. Francis Xavier -Discusses enrolment numbers and their significance over the years (until 2027)


Scenario 2 - Boundary Map discussed in detail - Boundaries change slightly between all three schools - Also, some boundary lines occur between property lots -Discusses enrolment numbers and their significance over the years (until 2027)

- All three boundary options are displayed (“Summary of Boundary Options”) -this diagram outlines enrolment for all three schools for each of the 3 Boundary Scenarios

-All resources are found on line, including historic pupil information

Boundary Review binder is now public and online: www.tcdsb.org/Board/PlanningandFacilities/BoundaryReview/Pages/default.aspx

Carmine Settino -Opens the floor to questions

Questions:

Parent at St. Fidelis

Question: Scenario 1 – in this Scenario you know which school you are going to Scenario 2 – in this Scenario, it is hard to know which school you should attend Why do you prefer Scenario 2 when it seems to be the most confusing?

Answer: -the property line divides the boundaries -Scenario 2 avoids half a street going to one school and half going to




another -the boundary is more obvious on larger map

Parent at St. Fidelis Question: I would like to see current population and dwelling numbers? Number of households in the area needs to be seen. The variance should be consistent with the numbers you have. This will be beneficial for parents to see.

Answer: -historic numbers are used -usually do not use households as a predictor of enrolment -households is not necessarily representative of the number of Catholics in the area -kindergarten students are the best indicator of enrolment and best predictor of Catholic households in a community

Parent (School?) Question: Point of Clarification: Current students are not affected? Siblings?

Answer: -Current students and siblings of students entering the school are not affected. -As long as one sibling is still in the school when the sibling enrols.

Sal Piccininni - One of the highest Catholic populations in Toronto

Committee Member Mr. Pacchiarotti

Question: When will the household numbers for the area be provided to the parent


who asked the first question?

Answer: -Principal will be given that information and it can be passed on to the parent.

-We can have another meeting if needed as well.

Carmine Settino -Thanks the parents for attending -Thanks the Committee -Encourages Parents & Community members to speak to one of the Community members if they require further information

-Mr. Settino continues to speak to Chaminade SS news. -Speaks about Cell Phone Theft and provides some tips for parents. -the “Black List” is a website that records stolen cell phone numbers -Chaminade students were interviewed for a news documentary that will air on Thursday on Global News.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 8:00pm

Next Meeting: TBA


APPENDIX ‘D’

Attendance Boundary Review (2013)

Immaculate Conception, St. Fidelis and St. Francis Xavier

Recommendations of the Boundary Review Committee

to the Board

April 16, 2014 Preamble

This document represents the group submission that was drafted by the Boundary Review

Committee whose members are listed below. We respectfully submit these recommendations to

the Attendance Boundary Review (2013‐2014) impacting the following schools: Immaculate

Conception, St. Fidelis, and St. Francis Xavier. The intent of the Boundary Review for the three

schools is to provide solutions for balanced enrolment at each of the schools. The changes will be

effective for the 2015‐2016 school year.

The Boundary Review Committee reviewed 6 scenarios (including the current boundaries) and

agreed to consider 3 possible Scenarios. These 3 Scenarios were considered the most viable and

were the ones presented at the public meetings for consideration.

The concerns raised by the Immaculate Conception community centred on the north boundary of

George Anderson Drive. A small number of parents on that street drive their children to

Immaculate Conception School and would like to continue to do so or would appreciate busing. A

mini‐bus does go along that route but only for extenuating circumstances/special permission.

Parents wondered if a student who is currently outside of a school boundary and ineligible for

transportation, will then become eligible after the boundary shifts to include the student’s

address. Board response: The student would become eligible if he resides more than 1.5 km from

the school or meets the Hazard Criteria in accordance to the Board’s Transportation Policy.

Parents appreciated knowing that their children would be able to continue to attend the school

where they are currently enrolled until Grade 8. In accordance with the admission policy, siblings

of students currently enrolled in the school will be given the same priority as those living within

the school boundaries. Parents requested that transportation services continue for those students

currently within the boundaries and receiving transportation, but who will be outside the school

boundary after the change. This will be brought to the board for recommendation. It was noted

that newly enrolled students would be subject to the current transportation policy.

The concerns generated from the St. Fidelis School community centred on the feasibility of

obtaining approval for a new school facility that could actually accommodate the projected

enrolment over the next 10 years within an expanded boundary. To alleviate the concern, central

Page 65 of 263

APPENDIX ‘D’

staff assured the community that there was a plan in place to accommodate the enrolment

projections for St. Fidelis. Approved boundary changes can also always be revisited if the need

arises. The community also felt it important that neighbours residing on the same street should be

attending the same school in order to build strong community ties. As such, the recommendation

has been made to draw boundary lines on backyard property limits as opposed to the centre of

the street.

The concerns discussed by St. Francis Xavier community revolved around steadily growing

enrolment at the school. The school has a very small gym which restricts community gatherings

and assemblies. Projections indicate that enrolment will continue to escalate to well beyond the

capacity of the school. A boundary review could stabilize the growth to within reasonable

standards relieving the issue of lack of space. Currently, students on one side of some of the

major streets attend St. Francis Xavier and students on the other side of the street attend St.

Fidelis. The community of St. Francis Xavier suggested that students who reside on either side of

Queens Drive east of Culford attend St. Francis Xavier School.

The three impacted schools were able to arrive at a unanimous decision of endorsing Scenario 2

boundary review proposal outlined by the planning department. We arrived at this decision after

two public meetings as well as four meetings of BRC members only. The recommendation is based

on discussions at those meetings along with feedback and intake from the affected communities.

It was collectively decided that all three parties would submit one report containing the reasoning

for our endorsement.

The boundary review committee would like to thank the parents, staff and students who have

given their time to participate in this important process. The committee took many factors into

account when arriving at its decision including but not limited to projected numbers, community

impact, busing issues, childcare, and intake from the affected members of the community.

Boundary Review Committees Members

Immaculate Conception:

Carmela Ferri (Principal)

Antonella Ruscitto‐D’Addario (Vice Principal)

Jenypher Ashby (CSAC Chair)

Effie Monteleone (CSAC Treasurer)

St. Fidelis:

Michael Caccamo (Principal)

Rosa Tucci (Vice Principal)

Pat Lanni (CSAC Chair)

Pat Pacchiarotti (CSAC Vice Chair)

Page 66 of 263

APPENDIX ‘D’

St. Francis Xavier:

Judy Onody (Principal)

Steve Dempsey (Vice Principal)

Adele Nemi‐Bottos (CSAC Co‐Chair)

Maggie Furmanski (CSAC Co‐Chair)

Community & School Board:

Laura Albanese (Member of Provincial Parliament – York South Weston)

Frank DiGiorgio (Councillor – Ward 12 York South Weston)

Ivana Padovan (Representative from Councillor Frank Di Giorgio’s Office)

Darlene Ferreira (Representative from MPP Laura Albanese’s Office)

Rose Gagliardi (St. Fidelis Parish representative)

Sal Piccininni (Trustee Ward 3)

Gina Iuliano Marrello (Superintendent of Education, Area 3)

Barbara Leporati (Planning Services)

David Paltser (Planning Services)

Kevin Hodgkinson (Transportation)

Erica Wilson – Principal of Madonna and the Chair for the first Public Meeting

Carm Settino – Principal of Chaminade and the Chair for the second Public Meeting

Recommendation

After considering the recommended boundaries for the three schools put forward by the Planning

Services Department, as well as input from discussions during the two public meetings, the

Boundary Review Committee has decided to endorse Scenario 2, as prepared by the Planning

Services Department. The committee believes that this proposal will accomplish the goal of

maintaining acceptable enrolment at each of the schools and ensuring that communities are

strengthened by having students on either side of the street (except for major streets) attend the

same school.

Conclusion

Based on the information provided during the consultation meetings and the feedback received

from stakeholders in the communities of Immaculate Conception, St. Fidelis, and St. Francis Xavier,

the Boundary Review Committee unanimously supports Scenario 2 boundaries recommendation

proposed by the Planning Services Department. The Boundary Review Committee respectfully

submits this recommendation for consideration in the boundary review process.

Page 67 of 263

Option:

Boun

dary

�Sce

nari

o�2

IMM

ACU

LATE

�CO

NCE

PTIO

NPo

rtables

Capa

city

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Pupil�Cou

nt0

529

440

465

486

494

530

538

553

571

586

615

599

596

593

590

587

Rate�of�U

tilization�

(%)

83%

88%

92%

93%

100%

102%

105%

108%

111%

116%

113%

113%

112%

112%

111%

ST�F

IDEL

ISPo

rtables

Capa

city

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Pupil�Cou

nt6

369

599

611

628

638

645

649

649

658

665

662

674

670

667

664

661

Rate�of�U

tilization�

(%)

162%

166%

170%

173%

175%

176%

176%

178%

180%

179%

183%

182%

181%

180%

179%

Rate�of�U

tilization�(%

)*A

ssum

es�capita

l�improvem

ent�to�increase�capacity

�to�

658�in�201

765

891

%93

%95

%97

%98

%99

%99

%10

0%10

1%10

1%10

2%10

2%10

1%10

1%10

0%

ST�F

RAN

CIS�

XAV

IER

Portables

Capa

city

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

Pupil�Cou

nt1

524

515

517

526

550

575

593

625

621

627

613

618

615

613

610

607

Rate�of�U

tilization�

(%)

98%

99%

100%

105%

110%

113%

119%

119%

120%

117%

118%

117%

117%

116%

116%

App

endi

x 'E

'

Page 68 of 263

ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW ST. FRANCIS …...CORPORATE AFFAIRS, STRATEGIC PLANNING AND PROPERTY Page 35 of 263 Page 2 of 5 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As a result of oversubscription pressures

Documents