Attachment Relationships
Jan 02, 2016
Attachment Relationships
Theories of Attachment
Bowlby and Ainsworth Findings
How attachment develops
Relationship between attachment and parenting behaviors
Outline
A strong emotional bond that forms between infant and caregiver in the second half of
the child’s first year
The development of attachment relationships is a major achievement in the infant’s early
social life
Develops out of interactions between infant and caregiver
Attachment Relationship
Theories of AttachmentPsychoanalytic Theory Infants become attached to their mother
because they associate her with gratification of their instinctual drive to obtain pleasure through sucking and oral stimulation
Learning Theory Drive-reduction learning theorists suggested
that the mother becomes an attachment object because she is associated with the reduction of the baby’s primary drive of hunger
Theories of Attachment
Harlow’s Research
◦ Baby monkeys preferred to cling to the cloth “mother”—especially in moments of stress—even though it dispensed no food
Similar findings in human research
Thus, oral gratification and drive reduction are inadequate explanations for attachment
Theories of AttachmentLearning TheoriesOperant Conditioning
◦ Attachment development based on visual, auditory, and tactile stimulation that infants receive from their caregivers
◦ Parents are the most reliable sources of this type of stimulation
Central point: attachment is not automatic; it develops over time as a result of satisfying (i.e.,rewarding) interactions with responsive adults
Theories of AttachmentCognitive Developmental Theory Importance of ability to differentiate between
familiar and unfamiliar others
Importance of object permanence - understanding that objects, including people, have a continuous existence apart from the baby’s own interactions with them
Cognitive shifts in expression of attachment◦ Less need for physical proximity
◦ Understanding of need for and temporary nature of separations from familiar people
Theories of AttachmentEthological Theory – Bowlby Theory influenced by Lorenz’s demonstration of
imprinting ◦ Birds and other infrahuman animals develop a preference
for the person or object to which they are first exposed during a brief, critical period after birth
Focused on signaling behaviors in human infant attachment◦ crying, smiling, vocalizing, sucking, clinging
Evolutionary biases make it likely child will use the parent as a secure base◦ A safety zone that the infant can retreat to for comfort
and reassurance when stressed or frightened while exploring the environment
Theories of Attachment
Ethological Theory – BowlbyThree important features of theory
◦Emphasis on the active role played by the infant’s early social signaling systems
◦Stress on the development of mutual attachments
◦Attachment is a dyadic relationship, not simply a behavior of either the infant or the parent
•Efforts to regain physical contact with figure
Proximity Seeking
•Efforts to maintain self-initiated contact with figure
Contact Maintenance
•Any active avoidance of proximity to or interaction with figure
Avoidance
•Negative behavior (often accompanied by anger) in response to figure’s contact attempts
Resistance
Infant Attachment Behaviors
Bowlby’s Attachment
Style
Proximity-
Seeking
Contact-Maintainin
g
Resistance
Avoidance
Secure High High Low Low
2 Insecure Styles
Insecure/Resistant High High High Low
Insecure/Avoidance Low Low Low High
**New Slide
Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Procedure (SSP)
1 Mother, baby, and observer
30 sec Observer introduces mother and baby to experimental room and then leaves. (Room contains appealing toys scattered about.)
2 Mother and baby 3 min Mother sits quietly while baby explores; if necessary, play is stimulated after 2 minutes.
3 Stranger, mother, and baby
3 min An unfamiliar woman enters. First minute: stranger is silent. Second minute: stranger talks to mother. Third minute: stranger approaches baby. After 3 minutes, mother leaves unobtrusively.
4 Stranger and baby ≈3 min First separation episode. Stranger is responsive to baby.
5 Mother and baby ≥3 min First reunion episode. Mother returns to room and greets and/or comforts baby and then tries to settle the baby again in play. Mother then leaves, saying “bye-bye.”
6 Baby alone ≤3 min Second separation episode.
7 Stranger and baby ≤3 min Continuation of second separation. Stranger enters and responds to baby’s behavior.
8 Mother and baby 3 min Second reunion episode. Mother enters, greets, and then picks up baby. Meanwhile, stranger leaves unobtrusively.
Intro to lab (30 sec)
Mother and child alone
Stranger enters
Mother leaves
Mother returns; stranger leaves
Mother leaves; child
alone
Stranger enters
Mother enters
Strange Situation
Clip**New Slide
•Efforts to regain physical contact with figure
Proximity Seeking
•Efforts to maintain self-initiated contact with figure
Contact Maintenance
•Any active avoidance of proximity to or interaction with figure
Avoidance
•Negative behavior (often accompanied by anger) in response to figure’s contact attempts
Resistance
Behavioral Responses during Reunion
**New Slide
Strange Situation Example: Securely Attached Baby
Strange Situation: Secure
Attachment Type Description
Secure (Type B)
Babies are able to explore novel environments, are minimally disturbed by brief separations from their mother, and are quickly comforted by her when she returns
Insecure-Avoidant (Type A)
Babies seem not to be bothered by their mother’s brief absences but specifically avoid her when she returns, sometimes becoming visibly upset
Insecure-Ambivalent (Type C)
Babies tend to become very upset at the departure of their mother and exhibit inconsistent behavior on the mother’s return, sometimes seeking contact, sometimes pushing their mother away. (This is sometimes referred to as insecure-resistant or anxious-ambivalent attachment.)
Insecure-Disorganized (Type D; added later)
Babies seem disorganized and disoriented when reunited with their mother after a separation
Ainsworth’s Classifications
Secure65%
Avoidant20%
Ambivalent10%
Disorganized5%
Secure Avoidant Ambivalent Disorganized
Attachment Classifications
Examples of Attachment Classifications
Attachment to Father
Insecurely Attached Infants
How Attachment DevelopsWhat it Means to be AttachedBy age 1: form first attachment
Seek contact and proximity with attachment figure
Separation distress or protest - An infant’s distress reaction to being separated from the attachment object, usually the mother◦7-9 mos: distress emerges◦15 mos: intensity of distress at highest.◦After 15 mos: distress decreases
How Attachment DevelopsAttached to Whom?
Mother is usually primary, but infant is capable of forming attachment to any familiar individual
Multiple attachments are common◦Father◦Grandparent◦Sibling
Number of attachments limited because requires frequent, close, one-to-one interaction
Attachment develops in phases (Shaffer & Emmerson, 1964)
◦Asocial phase (0-6 weeks) Social (e.g., smiling face) and non-social
(sticker) stimuli produces favorable reaction
◦Phase of indiscriminate attachments (6 weeks – 6/7 months) Indiscriminate social responsiveness. Enjoy
attention from anyone, but prefers regular caregiver
How Do Infants Become Attached?
Attachment develops in phases (Shaffer & Emmerson, 1964)
◦Specific attachment phase (7-9months) Protest when separated from a particular
person, usually mother. Will follow mother closely. Wary of strangers.
◦Phase of multiple attachments (approx. 18 months) Infants form attachment to other people beside
primary attachment figure
How Do Infants Become Attached?
What type of parenting behaviors might cause…◦A secure attachment?◦An ambivalent attachment?◦An avoidant attachment?◦A disorganized attachment?
Consider this…
Sensitive and responsive
Behavior guided by baby’s cues (don’t interrupt)
Accepting of baby and minimal frustration
Physically and psychologically available
Parenting Babies are able to
explore novel environments
Minimally disturbed by brief separations from their mother
Quickly comforted by her when she returns
Child Behavior
Secure Attachment
Parenting Behavior Descriptions
Sensitivity Responding promptly and appropriately to the infant’s signals
Positive Attitude
Expressing positive affect and affection for the infant
Synchrony Structuring smooth, reciprocal interactions with the infant (do not interrupt or interfere with babies activity)
Support Attending closely to and providing emotional support for the infants activities
Stimulation Frequently directing actions toward the infant (do not ignore)
Parenting that is correlated with Secure Attachment (SPSS-S)
Intrusive and rejecting parenting (impatient)
Unresponsive to infant signals
Rarely have close bodily contact
Act angry & irritable
Parenting Babies seem not to
be bothered by their mother’s brief absences
Specifically AVOID her when she returns
Even though they sometimes becoming visibly upset
Child Behavior
Insecure-Avoidant Attachment
Unaffectionate and inconsistent parenting
Sometimes respond to infants cues and sometimes not (depending on parental mood)
More often tend to be indifferent
ParentingBabies tend to become
very upset at the departure of their mother
Inconsistent behavior on the M’s return, sometimes seeking contact, sometimes pushing their mother away
Often can’t be soothed up mothers return
Child Behavior
Insecure-AmbivalentAttachment*
*Also called insecure-ambivalent or anxious attachment
Unaffectionate and inconsistent parenting
Sometimes induces fear or reassurance in infant
ParentingCombination of
resistant and avoidant patterns
Confused about whether to approach or avoid mother
When reunited with mother they may be fearful, freeze, may move close or move away
Child Behavior
Disorganized Attachment
Typical rate of secure attachment for middle-class U.S. children is◦65%
But, only 38% of infants with insensitive mothers show secure attachment
Replicated: Relationship b/w father’s sensitivity and infant attachment style◦Relationship is significant, but weaker
A couple notes on parental sensitivity…
**New Slide
Key to attachment classification:◦Parental response when the attachment
system is activated (during times of distress) Chest to chest contact Still Face Experiment
◦Sensitivity and sweet parenting at other times less important for the attachment relationship
Sweet Nothings vs. Secure Base Provision