Attachment 23 General Atomics Electronic Systems 04038903-7SP, Revision C, "Qualification Basis for 04034101-001 (2-RE-90-271, -272, -273 & -274)" (Non-Proprietary)
Attachment 23
General Atomics Electronic Systems 04038903-7SP, Revision C,"Qualification Basis for 04034101-001 (2-RE-90-271, -272, -273 & -274)" (Non-Proprietary)
REVISIONSREV ........ _DESCRIPTION . DATE APPROVED
B INCORPORATED ECN 400000218 2-10.11 B. WILKINSON2-10-11 P. BERNER
A. EVANS 2/1012011 2-10-11 A. EVANS2-10-11 E. CABEL
C INCORPORATED ECN 400000298S. HUMS 2/22/2011
7,-- 2-11P.A -5%
0.IZAL~iC I iisera
P. &a-'.-
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001General Atomics HARA
Redacted Qualification Basis for 04034101-001
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION I Job Number: 25402SUPPLIER DOCUMENT REVIEW STATUS
STATUS CODE;1 Li Work may proceed. 3 [] Rejected. Revise and resubmit
1C l Workmayproceed. Editorial 4 [ Revraw not required. Work maycomments need only be incorporated proceed.if revised for other purposes.
2 [] Revise and resubmit Work may P027proceed subject to Incorporation of 8595changes indicated.
Permission to proceed does not constitute acceptance or approval of design details, calculatons,analysis, test methods, or materials developed or selected by the Supplier and does not relieve the
SEISMIC CATEGORY I
Change doc.Classification
+4. CENEURAL ATOMICS 4949GREENCRAIG LANEv ELCTRONIC SVSTMS SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1675
DRAWN DATEA,E. BUTr 1115110
CHECKED
J. OWEN 12113/10ENGR
A.E.BUTT QUALIFICATION BASIS for 04034101-001RVW. GRATZA 1206110 (2-RE-90-271, -272, -273 & -274)
PROJ MISR SIZE FSCM NO. DRAWING NO. REVP. BERNER 12113110
RELEASE S.ARTER 1.117110 A 58307 04038903-7SP CRELEASE SHEET
E. (;ABEL 1,2J,7110 OR-NG LEVEL 3 SCAL.E: NONE ... 1 of 50J, .... I
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
CHANGE RECORD
Issue
Rev. A
Rev. B
Rev. C
Date
December 2010
February 2011
February 2011
Description of Change
Original Issue
Incorporated CustomerComments
Incorporated CustomerComments
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 2
GA-ESI PROPRIETARY
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
CONTENTS
1 INTRO DUCTIO N .................................................................................................. 6
1.1 ENGINEERING AND COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEM CHANGES THAT AFFECT
QUALIFICATION ............................................................................................................ 6
1.2 REPORT CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... 7
2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION BASIS .................................................... 8
2.1 SERVICE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 8
2.2 02818905-QSR COMPONENT REVIEW ...................................................................... 9
2.3 QUALIFICATION BASIS ................................................................................................ 9
2.3.1 RM-1000 and I-F Converter Modules ............................................................................................ 10
2.3.2 RD-23 Detectors ............................................................................................................................. 12
3 SEISM IC Q UALIFICATIO N BASIS ................................................................... 13
3.1 SEISMIC REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 13
3.1.1 Plant Equipment Seismic Requirements .................................................................................. 13
3.1.2 Seismic Requirements for Control Room and Devices ............................................................ 16
3.2 COMPONENT REVIEW ................................................................................................. 17
3.3 QUALIFICATION BASIS ................................................................................................ 18
3.3.1 NIM Bin Assembly .......................................................................................................................... 19
3.3.2 Line Filter. ........................................................................................................................................ 24
3.3.3 RD-23 Detector ............................................................................................................................... 25
4 REPLACEM ENT SCHEDULE ............................................................................ 28
5 EM C Q UALIFICATIO N BASIS .......................................................................... 29
5.1 MONITOR SYSTEM QUALIFICATION BASIS ............................................................. 29
5.2 RADIATED SUSCEPTIBILITY ....................................................................................... 30
5.2.1 Low Frequency Radiated Susceptibility ................................................................................... 31
5.2.2 High Frequency Radiated Susceptibility ................................................................................... 31
5.3 CONDUCTED SUSCEPTIBILITY ................................................................................ 32
5.4 IMPULSE AND BURST IMPULSE SUSCEPTIBILITY ................................................. 32
5.5 RADIATED EMISSIONS .............................................................................................. 32
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 3
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
5.6 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS .......................................................................................... 33
6 SOFTWARE QUALIFICATION BASIS ............................................................. 34
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................. 36
APPENDIX A POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY ANALYSIS ....................................... 38
A.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 38
A.2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ....................................................................................... 38
A.3 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 38
A .4 M ET H O D ............................................................................................................................ 39
A.5 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................ 40
A.5.1 GA-ESI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ........................................................................................... 40
A.5.2 ALLOWABLE BOLT STRESS CALCULATIONS ..................................................................... 41
A.6 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................. 41
A.7 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 41
A.7.1 GIVEN INFORMATION AND PARAMETERS ......................................................................... 42
A. 7.2 POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBL Y MASS ...................................................................................... 42
A. 7.3 NATURAL FREQUENCY OF THE POWER SUPPLY BRACKET .......................................... 43
A.7.4 ANAL YSIS OF SCREWS A TTACHING POWER SUPPL Y ASSEMBL Y TO RM- 1000 .......... 45
A.7.5 ANALYSIS OF POWER SUPPLY BRACKET .......................................................................... 47
TABLESTABLE 2-1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION SUMMARY TABLE FOR 04034101 -001 ........................................ 10
TABLE 3-1 REQUIRED ACCELERATION VALUES FOR HIGH RANGE AREA MONITOR PLANT EQUIPMENT .............. 13
TABLE 3-2 VERTICAL REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (BUILDING ARS) ........................................................ 14
TABLE 3-3 HORIZONTAL REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (BUILDING ARS) .................................................. 15
TABLE 3-4 REQUIRED ANALYSIS ACCELERATIONS FOR PLANT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 16
TABLE 3-5 REQUIRED ACCELERATION VALUES (ARS) FOR THE CONTROL ROoM ............................................. 16
TABLE 3-6 REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR DEVICES ............................................................................ 17
TABLE 3-7 SEISMIC QUAUFICATION SUMMARY TABLE FOR GA-ESI P/N 04034101-001 ................................... 18
TABLE 4-1 HIGH RANGE AREA MONITOR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE ............................................................... 28
TABLE 5-1 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY TEST RESULTS FOR RM-1000, I-F CONVERTER, AND RD-23 ....... 30
TABLE A-1 LIST OF EQUIPMENT ANALYZED UNDER SEISMIC CONDITIONS ......................................................... 38
TABLE A-2 REQUIRED ACCELERATIONS FOR GENERIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ............................................... 40
TABLE A-3 GIVEN INFORMATION AND PARAMETERS ......................................................................................... 42
TABLE A-4 POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY MASS .................................................................................................. 43
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 4
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001
TABLE A-5 NATURAL FREQUENCY OF THE POWER SUPPLY BRACKET ............................................................. 44
TABLE A-6 ANALYSIS OF SCREWS ATTACHING POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY TO NIM BIN .............................. 46
TABLE A-7 ANALYSIS OF POWER SUPPLY BRACKET ................................ ............................................... 48
FIGURES
FIGURE2-1 I-F CONVERTER MODULE ASSEMBLY (04501351-001) ............................................................. 12
FIGURE 3-1 VERTICAL REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (ARS) FOR PLANT EQUIPMENT ................................ 14
FIGURE 3-2 HORIZONTAL REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (ARS) FOR PLANT EQUIPMENT .......................... 15
FIGURE 3-3 REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR DEVICES ................................................................... 17
FIGURE 3-4 04508905-QR VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR NIM BIN ASSEMBLY ................................... 22
FIGURE 3-5 04508905-QR HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR NIM BIN ASSEMBLY ............................. 23
FIGURE 3-6 E-254-0960 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA (ARS) FOR RD-23 DETECTOR ............................. 26
FIGURE 3-7 E-254-0960 HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA (ARS) FOR RD-23 DETECTOR ....................... 27
FIGURE A-1 POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 39
FIGURE A-2 ANALYSIS OF SCREWS ATTACHING POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY TO RM-1 000 .............................. 45
FIGURE A-3 ANALYSIS OF POWER SUPPLY BRACKET .......................................................................... 48
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 5
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
1 INTRODUCTION
This Qualification Basis Report for GA-ESI P/N 04034101-001 High Range Area Monitor
System provides the evaluation and justification to demonstrate the environmental, seismic,
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), and software qualification. This report is a supplement to
the principle report GA-ESI report 04038903-QSR. GA-ESI report 04038903-QSR provides the
following:
" Equipment Description
* Environmental Qualification Requirements
* Seismic Qualification Requirements
3-14 through 3-16 and CEB-SS-5.10 R3, F
* EMC Qualification Requirements
" Software Qualification Requirements
" GA-ESI's Environmental Qual Program
* GA-ESI's Seismic Qual Program
" GA-ESI's EMC Qual Program
" GA-ESI's Software Qual Program
Section 2.7
Sections 3.2 and 3.2.7
Section 3.3 and Figures 3-4 though 3-7 and
igure 3-1.
Section 3.4
Section 3.5
Section 4.2
Section 4.3
Section 4.4
Section 4.5
1.1 ENGINEERING AND COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEM CHANGES THAT AFFECTQUALIFICATION
This qualification report is based on the configuration of the monitor assembly on September 24,
2010.
In addition to qualifying assemblies and components by similarity, changes made to these parts
and systems are reviewed and addressed in this report as follows:
Some parts of the equipment qualified in this report have changes from those like-
numbered parts that were qualified in the reports referenced in this report. All
revisions and changes to parts that are Commercial Grade Items, and were
qualified in the referenced qualification reports, have been evaluated and justified
for qualification equivalency during the normal parts database management
process. This qualification evaluation during parts database change is standard, in
accordance with GA-ESI Operating Procedure OP-4.0-190. Similarly, all revisions
and changes to any subassembly parts that were qualified in the referenced
qualification reports have been evaluated and justified during the standard
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 6
25402-011 -V1 A-HARA-001 90-001
Engineering Change Notice (ECN) process, in accordance with GA-ESI Operating
Procedure OP-4.0-130.
1.2 REPORT CONTENTS
This report consists of the following sections.
Section 1. INTRODUCTION. This section describes the reason for the report, its organization,
identification of the radiation monitors being qualified, and a description of the contents of each
section.
Section 2. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION BASIS. This section demonstrates the
environmental qualification of the equipment by similarity to equipment and components
successfully tested to requirements equal to or better than the requirements for the radiation
monitors being supplied.
Section 3. SEISMIC QUALIFICATION BASIS. Section 3 documents the integrity of the monitor
system during seismic conditions. This is accomplished by demonstrating that the Test Response
Spectra for similar equipment envelops the Required Response Spectra for the equipment location
and by analysis.
Section 4 REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE. This section provides the replacement schedule for
components whose life is less than 40 years.
Section 5. ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY QUALIFICATION BASIS: Section 5 describes
the tests conducted to document EMC and reported in GA-ESI document 04038800.
Section 6. SOFTWARE QUALIFICATION BASIS: The Software Qualification Basis section
describes the history of software configuration control and testing in accordance with the
requirements of a 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix A Quality Assurance program. The Verification and
Validation program for the RM-1000 software has been reported in a number of reports which are
identified in the section.
Section 7. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS. This section lists the GA-ESI documents and drawings
referenced in the body of the report.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 7
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION BASIS
The environmental qualification of the High Range Area Monitor System, GA-ESI P/N
04034101-001, is based on previously completed qualification tests, GA-ESI design review, and
manufacturers design specifications. The monitor system is Safety Related and required for
Post Accident Monitoring.
2.1 SERVICE CONDITIONS
The High Range Area Monitor Systems are located in several areas of the Watts Bar Unit 2
nuclear power plant. The service conditions in those areas are given in GA-ESI document
04038903-QSR and are summarized below.
* RD-23 High Range Detectors: These detectors are located in the Containment Upper
and Lower Compartment areas. These are Harsh environment areas and the detectors
are required to operate during and after accident conditions. The service conditions
given below are the most severe conditions in the two locations:
Average Temperature:
Abnormal Temperature:
Abnormal Humidity:
Normal Radiation:
Accident Temperature
Accident Pressure:
Accident Humidity:
Accident Radiation:
Post Accident Operating Time:
Chemical Spray: - -
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 8
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
RM-1000 NIM Bin Assembly and Line Filter: These components are located in the
control room area. The service conditions are:
Average Temperature:
Abnormal Temperature Range:
Abnormal Humidity Range:
Normal Radiation:
2.2 02818905-QSR COMPONENT REVIEW
A review of the High Range Area Monitor System list of materials was made for major
assemblies that were previously environmentally qualified by GA-ESI report 02818905-QSR.
The TVA tag numbers and their representative components were qualified as part of the GA-ESI
report 02818905-QSR. Specifically, the RD-23 detector (GA-ESI P/N 03602062-001), a NIM
Bin assembly (GA-ESI P/N 02810279-001), and an RP-2C module (GA-ESI P/N 02810410-002)
were qualified. The RD-23 detector being qualified is that same as that qualified by 02818905-
QSR and its qualification basis will not be repeated in this report. The RP-2C module has been
replaced by an RM-1 000 and I/F converter and will be qualified by this report.
2.3 QUALIFICATION BASIS
This section describes the basis for the qualification of the High Range Area Monitor System.
The detectors are qualified for a Harsh environment and the Control Room components for a
Mild environment. Therefore, the detectors are qualified for normal, abnormal, accident, and
post-accident service conditions. The Control Room components are qualified for normal and
abnormal service conditions, but they must operate through the accident and post accident
periods in those service conditions.
For Mild environments, GA-ESI type tests computer based assemblies that are designed and
manufactured by GA-ESI to abnormal extremes to demonstrate performance over the
temperature and humidity range that the assemblies may experience in service. Certain other
assemblies, whose performance may be affected by extremes, designed and manufactured by
GA-ESI, are also tested at temperature and humidity extremes. All other components and
assemblies are selected for the generic service conditions and approved through a design
review and commercial grade dedication process (in accordance with GA-ESI procedure OP-
7.3-240). Performance and functionality of the monitor assembly are demonstrated by the final
Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP). A certificate of compliance is provided with the accepted
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 9
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
assembly. Components and modules that have a life less than 40 years are identified in
Section 4, Replacement Schedule.
For Harsh environments, GA-ESI type tests all components for normal, abnormal, accident, and
post accident service conditions to demonstrate that those components will perform their safety
functions.
The detectors, located in the Upper and Lower Containment Compartment environment, have a
normal radiation total dose greater than GA-ESI levels of qualification. A radiation review of
each part in the assemblies was performed using TVA RIMS report #B43'860721903 as the
basis for qualifying the equipment to higher levels of radiation. The results of that review are
given in GA-ESI report 02818905-QSR.
Environmental Qualification Summary Table 2-1 identifies the assemblies that are qualified by
test and the test article that was utilized to demonstrate that qualification. The subsequent
subsections describe that testing performed for each assembly and compare the test article with
the assembly being qualified.
Table 2-1 Environmental Qualification Summary Table for 04034101-001
Component GA-ESl P/N Test Article Qual Report Qual Section
High Range Area Monitor System 04034101-001
NIM Bin Assembly 04030801-001
RM-1000 w/Relay Interface 04501200-004 04501000-001 04508905-1SP 2.3.1
I-F Converter Module 04501351-003 04506150-001 04508905-2SP 2.3.1
RD-23 Detector 03602062-001 02818905-QSR 2.3.2
2.3.1 RM-1000 and I-F Converter Modules
Similar RM-1000 Module (GA-ESI P/N 04501000-001) and I-F Converter Module (GA-ESI P/N
04506150-001), to the RM-1000 Module (GA-ESI P/N 04501200-004) and I-F Converter Module
(GA-ESI P/N 04501351-003) being qualified, were tested as a unit connected to an
o the extremes of temperature and humidity as reported in 04508905-OR. The
modules being qualified are modifications to the tested modules and are qualified by similarity
by supplement GA-ESI reports 04508905-1SP (RM-1000 Module) and 04508905-2SP (I-F
Converter Module). The difference between the modules reported in the above reports
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 10
25402-011-VIA-HARA-001 90-001
(04508905-QR, 04508905-1SP, and -704508905-2SP) and the modules being qualified is the
color of the front panel paint and is judged in-significant.
The RM-1000 and I-F Converter Module test article components with age related failure
mechanisms were age conditioned to near end of life. ••vas performed for
ach from The
applied line voltage was set at and -T The modules met the acceptance criteria. • tests were performed at
with a IThe RM-
1000 and I-F Converter passed all performance tests. The RM-1000 and I-F converter are
considered qualified environmentally.
2.3.1.1 RM-1000 Module
The RM-1000 module (GA-ESI P/N 04501200-004) is similar to the RM-1000 module (GA-ESI
P/N 04501000-001) tested and reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-QR. A detail
comparison between the GA-ESI P/N 04501200-001 & -002 (P/N 04501200-004 is the same
except paint color) and GA-ESI P/N 04501000-001 is provided in GA-ESI document 04508905-
1SP (Supplement 1). The significant differences are listed below:
" The The original
Mis no longer available.
* The Keypad/Display Printed Wiring Assembly (PWA)
" The CPU
" The Output PWA was changed to accommodate the new
voltage of as required by the original
The RM-1000 Planar display (GA-ESI P/N 50016021-001) is similar to the RM-2000
display unit. The new display module is the same manufacturer and model series as the RM-
2000 display. The only difference is size where the RM-1000 display is smaller than the RM-
2000. Both displays are Safety Related, Class 1E and Seismic Category I qualified.
2.3.1.2 I-F Converter Module
The I-F Converter module (GA-ESI P/N 04501351-003) is similar to the I-F Converter module
(GA-ESI P/N 04501301-001) tested and reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-OR. The
differences between GA-ESI P/N 04501301-001 and GA-ESI P/N 04501351-001 & -002 (P/N
04038903-7SP
RevC Page11
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
04501351-003 is the same except paint color) as provided in GA-ESI document 04508905-2SP
(Supplement 2) are:
* The external enclosure. A standard • is used for GA-ESI P/N 04501351-003 in
place of base used for GA-ESI P/N 04501301-001.
" The connectors mounting location. The same connectors are used for both modules. The
is on the whereas the GA-ESI P/N
04501301-001 connector mounting is on the cover of the metal box.
" The wiring length. The wiring for the to the connectors is
the= for the GA-ESI P/N 04501301-001 module.
Connector JA is for the signal connector from the RD-23A detector and connector J3 is for the
output signal from the I-F Converter to the RM-1000.
_o the I-F Converter (from the RM-1000).
2.3.2 RD-23 Detectors
The RD-23 detectors (GA-ESI P/N 03602062-001) are qualified for a Harsh environment and
post accident monitoring. Refer to GA-ESI report 02818905-QSR for qualification basis.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 12
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
3 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION BASISThe seismic qualification of the High Range Area Monitor System, GA-ESI P/N 04034101-001,
is based on previously completed seismic tests and analysis. This section describes the basis
for the seismic qualification. The monitor is Seismic Category I.
3.1 SEISMIC REQUIREMENTS
The High Range Area Monitor System is safety related and is required to operate during or after
an earthquake. For qualification by random is used to
ensure that the Test Response Spectra envelopes the Required Response Spectra. For
analysis the values of ZPA and peak acceleration shall be based on
3.1.1 Plant Equipment Seismic Requirements
The requirements for the seismic qualification of the High Range Area Monitor RD-23 detector
located in the plant are found in GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR, Figures 3-4 through 3-7.
The ZPA and peak acceleration values for plant equipment are given in Table 3-1. The values
provided in Table 3-1 represent the highest accelerations of both the Upper and Lower
Containment Compartments. East-West spectra were provided by the customers Figure
C1.180. Since the detector is attached to the building walls, the ARS defines the RRS.
Table 3-1 Required Acceleration Values for High Range Area Monitor Plant Equipment
Parameter Vertical North-South East-West-
Testing
Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA) - g's
= Acceleration - g's
Analysls•
Zero Period Acceleration - g's
Peak Acceleration - g's
For comparison of the Test Response Spectra (TRS) with the Required Response Spectra
(RRS) a simplified RRS curve is constructed using the information given in GA-ESI document
04038903-QSR Figures 3-4 through 3-7 and Table 3-1, as follows. The governing North-South
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 13
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
spectra provided in GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR envelopes the East-West spectra
provided by the customer.
* Vertical: The spectrum given in GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR Figure 3-4 and 3-6
are to envelope the RRS shown in those figures. The vertical
RRS is shown in Figure 3-1 (Data in Table 3-2).
* Horizontal: The spectra given in GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR Figures 3-5 and 3-
7 are broadened, and simplified to envelope the north-south RRS in those figures. The
horizontal RRS is shown in Figure 3-2 (Data in Table 3-3).
Vertical Required ResponseSpectrum
--
*10
0.1
1 10 100 1000
Frequency, Hertz
Figure 3-1 Vertical Required Response Spectrum (ARS) for Plant Equipment
Table 3-2 Vertical Required Response Spectrum (Building ARS)
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION(SEC.) (Hz) (G's
1.000 1 0.25
0.556 1.8 0.42
0.323 3.1 0.42
0.167 6 1.7
0.125 8 1.7
0.100 10 0.95
0.048 21 0.95
0.025 40 0.34
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 14
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001
Horizontal Required ResponseSpectrum
10
F u n41T 4~j~~ -~j~r l
1 10 100 1000
Frequency, Hertz
Figure 3-2 Horizontal Required Response Spectrum (ARS) for Plant Equipment
Table 3-3 Horizontal Required Response Spectrum (Building ARS)
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION(SEC.) (Hz) (G's)
1.000 1 0.45
0.333 3 1.2
0.200 5 6.4
0.167 6 6.4
0.083 12 1.6
0.025 40 1.04
For analyzing structural and support elements the values given in Table 3-1 are modified by
multiplying the peak and ZPA values by 0 Peak values times 0 are used if the natural
frequency of the element being analyzed is not calculated or the natural frequency is in the
dynamic range (< 33 Hz). ZPA values times Ws conservatively used if the natural frequency
is calculated and is in the rigid range (> 33 Hz). The required accelerations are calculated
directly from the Table 3- Table 3-4 provides the required accelerations
for analysis.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 15
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001
Table 3-4 Required Analysis Accelerations for Plant Equipment
Analysis Method Vertical
Acceleration
g's
Max Horizontal
Acceleration
g's
*1*-
Natural Frequency not Calculated or in the DynamicRange
Natural Frequency Calculated and in Rigid Range
3.1.2 Seismic Requirements for Control Room and Devices
The requirements for the seismic qualification of the High Range Area Monitor equipment
located on the control room floor and walls (ARS) are found in GA-ESI document 04038903-
QSR, Figures 3-14, 3-15, and 3-16. The ZPA and peak acceleration values for the ARS are
given in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Required Acceleration Values (ARS) for the Control Room
Parameter Vertical North-South East-West
Testing
Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA) - g's
Peak Acceleration - g's
Analysiss)
Zero Period Acceleration - g's
Peak Acceleration - g's
For qualification by testing, the Required Response Spectra (RRS) for devices is constructed
using the information given in CEB-SS-5.10 Rev. 3, Figure 3.1. This figure is used for testing
individual parts. This RRS is shown in Figure 3-3 (Data in Table 3-6). Figures 3-4 and 3-5
show that this RRS is enveloped by the TRS of the RM-1000 and the NIM Bin assembly.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page16
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
Table 3-6 Required Response Spectrum for Devices
3.2 COMPONENT REVIEW
A review of the High Range Area Monitor System list of materials was made for major
assemblies that were previously seismically qualified by GA-ESI report E-115-0459. Major
assemblies for this monitor have not been qualified by GA-ESI report E-1 15-0459, therefore,
this qualification basis is for all assemblies and components.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 17
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
3.3 QUALIFICATION BASIS
This section describes the basis for the seismic qualification of the High Range Area Monitor
System. The monitor system is qualified as seismic Category I and is required to be functional
during and after a seismic event.
GA-ESI seismically qualifies radiation monitoring systems by test and structurally by analysis.
Generally, components and assemblies that are tested are tested functionally as well as
ensuring the seismic adequacy of the structure. GA-ESI has tested the radiation monitoring
systems using test methods. Conservative analysis is
performed
in
GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR.
The Seismic Qualification Summary Table 3-7 identifies the assemblies that are qualified by test
or analysis. The test article that was utilized to demonstrate qualification is provided as well as
the test report. The subsequent subsections describe the testing or analysis for each assembly
and compare the test article or the structure analyzed with the assembly being qualified.
Table 3-7 Seismic Qualification Summary Table for GA-ESI P/N 04034101-001
Component GA-ESI P/N Test Test Article Qual Qual
Component Report Section
High Range Area Monitor 04034101-001
NIM Bin Assembly 04030801-001 04500801-001 04500801-001 04508905-OR 3.3.1
NIM Bin Assembly Frame 04502001-004 04502001-001 04502001-001 04508905-OR 3.3.1.1
RM-1000 w/relay Interface Board 04501200-004 04501000-001 04501000-001 04508905-iSP 3.3.1.2
I-F Converter Module 04501351-003 04506150-001 04506150-001 04508905-2SP 3.3.1.2
Power Supply w/Bracket 04500850-001 04038903-7SP 3.3.1.3(analysis)
Power Supply 04502050-001 04502005-001 04500801-001 04508905-QR 3.3.1.4
Line Filter 50015790-001 04438901-QSR, 3.3.2Appendix A(Analysis)
RD-23 Detector 03602062-001 03602062-001 03602062-001 E-254-0960 3.3.3
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 18
25402-011 -Vl A-HARA-00190-001
3.3.1 NIM Bin Assembly
The Control Room NIM Bin Assembly (GA-ESI P/N 04030801-001) contains RM-1000 and I-F
Converter Modules as well as the power supply assembly. The components are qualified
individually by test and analyses of similar components discussed in the following subsections.
The NIM Bin Assembly is similar to the NIM Bin Assembly used for the qualification testing of
the original 24 volt power supply, the RM-1 000 and the I-F Converter Modules.
3.3.1.1 NIM Bin Assembly Frame
The NIM Bin Assembly frame (GA-ESI P/N 04030801-001) is an all metal structural support for the
RM-1000 module, the I-F Converter Module, and 24 volts DC power supply and, therefore,
requires seismic qualification. The NIM Bin Assembly frame is similar to the tested NIM Bin
Assembly Frame (GA-ESI P/N 04502001-001). The test article with the subassemblies installed
was tested seismically as reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-QR. The RM-1000 NIM Bin
Assembly was subjected and
Shutdown Earthquakes (SSE).
and The Test Response Spectra (TRS)
for a typical SSE in the X-Y plane are shown in Figures 3-4 and 3-5. The RM-1000 NIM Bin
Assembly and its mounting hardware successfully passed this testing. The assembly frame is
considered qualified.
3.3.1.2 RM-1000 Modules
The RM-1000 module (SE P/N 04501200-004) is similar to the RM-1000 modules tested (GA-ESI
P/N 04501000-001) and reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-OR and 04508905-1SP. GA-
ESI report 04508905-1SP provides a similarity analysis. The RM-1000 modules limited life
components were age conditioned prior to performing these tests.
Following the environmental qualification test, the RM-1000 Module was given a seismic
qualification test as reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-QR. A pre-seismic functional test was
performed on RM-1 000 module.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 19
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
The modules passed the functional test.
The RM-1000 modules were placed in a power up and test condition. Selected closed contacts of
the alarm relays were monitored for chatter throughout the tests. A current and voltage analog
output from each module was monitored throughout the test.
The modules were subjected to as described in Section
3.3.1.1. The typical TRSs are shown in Figures 3-4 and 3-5. The relays did not chatter and there
was no loss of analog signal throughout the testing.
Following the seismic testing the modules were given a post-seismic functional test. The RM-1000
modules passed the test and are considered seismically qualified.
3.3.1.3 I-F Converter Modules
The I-F Converter Module (GA-ESI P/N 04501351-001) is similar to the tested I-F Converter
(GA-ESI P/N 04506150-001) and reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-QR. The similarity
analysis for the I-F Converter Module is provided in GA-ESI report 04508905-2SP.
Following the environmental qualification test, the I-F Converter Module was given a seismic
qualification test as reported in GA-ESI document 04508905-QR. A pre-seismic functional test was
performed.
The modules passed the functional test.
~04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 20
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
The I-F Converter Module was subjected to the same seismic testing as the RM-1000 Modules.
The I-F Converter Module remained functional during those tests. The TRS versus RRS curves
for the tests are shown in Figures 3-4 and 3-5. The module passed a post seismic functional
test and is considered qualified. The figures show that the TRS fully enveloped the RRS (CEB-
SS-5.10 Rev. 3, Figure 3-1) shown in Figure 3-3.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 21
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 22
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 23
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
3.3.1.4 Power Supply Bracket
The Power Supply Bracket (GA-ESI P/N 04502017-001 and -002) and its bolt mounting are
analyzed in Appendix A using the calculated weight and analyzed at in all directions.
The analyses show that the stress levels of the bracket assembly are within the allowable
stresses for both the GA-ESI generic and TVA specific cases. The power supply bracket is
considered seismically adequate and qualified.
3.3.1.5 Power Supply
The 24 Volt Power Supply (GA-ESI P/N 04502050-001) is attached to the bracket qualified in
3.3.1.4 and to the back of the NIM Bin Assembly and provides power to the RM-1000 and I-F
Converter Modules. The power supply is a replacement power supply for the originally tested
power supply (GA-ESI P/N 04502005-001). GA-ESI document 04508905-QR demonstrates
that the replacement power supply is similar to the test article, since they are by the same
manufacturer and model series. The replacement power supply has a higher current rating and,
therefore, slightly heavier. The Technical Evaluation further demonstrates that the slightly
greater weight does not affect the seismic qualification.
The original power supply (test article) parts that had age related failure mechanisms (aluminum
electrolytic capacitors, transformer, coils, and wire) were age conditioned as described in GA-
ESI document 04508905-QR. The age conditioned parts were then assembled into the two
power supplies that were mounted on the rear of the NIM Bin Assembly Frame and provided
power to the RM-1000 processor modules being qualified. Sections 3.3.1.1, 3.3.1.2, and 3.3.1.3
described the tests performed. The low voltage power supply is considered seismically
qualified.
3.3.2 Line Filter
The separately provided line filter is qualified by analysis described in GA-ESI document
04438901-QSR, Appendix A7. The line filter is an
It is consider rigid and, Pereore, LP1aceleraion levels pusmargin are used for the analysis. The accelerations used ar in all three axes. These
are much greater than the accelerations required to meet - rol Room panel seismic
requirements (Figure 3-3). The maximum principal stresses in the fasteners are
__ These are well within the TVA stress allowable.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 24
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001
3.3.3 RD-23 Detector
The RD-23 Detector (GA-ESI P/N 03602062-001) is the same detector as the tested RD-23
Detector reported in GA-ESI report E-254-0960. The seismic tests were Mwith the test
article attached rigidly to the shake table in the same configuration as the unit being qualified
would be in the field. There wasn't any amplification between the shake table and the mounting
location. An RP-2C Module was connected to the RD-23 detector throughout the testing and a
= output from the detector was used during the testing to verify
operation. The test article was given 0 Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) tests and 0
Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) test then rotated f and the test sequence repeated.
Figures 3-6 and 3-7 shows the accelerometer response at the detector and compares the fSTest Response Spectra (TRS) to the Required Response Spectra (RRS). The test
article remained intact and functional throughout the testing and is considered qualified. The
detector passed a post seismic functional test and is considered qualified.
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 25
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 26
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
WYLE LABORATORIES
CUSTOMER 6-4' fC
Report No. 58567
Job No. . Page No. 5,
Pull Scale /operator --
Date /M
Accel. No. S_____
Specimen . rkIa2irftc
Damping 123r
Control C ) Response
Err __
Axis of Teat A-V
RESPONSE SPECTRUM2 a 4 ISa a 4 8 67 I t oo p 1 a If aI 'i 4 IA B J lIIq,
/,
'p
m0_ .,o.....
•iTRS 5% DAMPING II
I 4m
D I
I a
I
7?fII ,tttli r ,r fQin Effio. f~lA flift~me I'tff'ffl"lfff-M ht-il
'I
. 1 1. 1 1 1 -01 1-1. 1 1 1 1 1 ý K3 0 KOL FNAKAM KIý-
11 H............ ...........
....... .. ............. ......
.............. .......... ......
.... ................ .
i i i iisim i F i H
I I t j4111f
Io
I
61
a
I22
I10 I I IFRQUENCY Hz
Figure 3-7 E-254-0960 Horizontal Response Spectra (ARS) for RD-23 Detector
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 27
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
4 REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE
The replacement schedule for components that contain parts with significant aging mechanisms
is provided in this section. The replacement schedules provided in Table 4-1 are based on an
Lifetime for components in enclosures include an
A dash entry indicates a higher-level assembly that does not
require replacement but contains the component to be replaced. The individual components to
be replaced are listed with a qualified life in years.
Table 4-1 High Range Area Monitor Replacement Schedule
Component GA-ESI P/N Life @ 86°F Notes
Years
High Range Area Monitor 04034101-001 ---
NIM Sin Assembly 04030801-001 ---
RM-1 000 Module Assembly 04501200-004 ---
Front Plate Assembly 04501260-001
Keypad/Display PWA 04503070-001 ...
Keypad 87YY3616A-534
Gas Plasma Display 50016021-001
Output PWA 04503080-001
Display/Keypad Cable 04502018-002Assembly
24 Volt Power Supply 04502050-001
Notes:
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 28
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
5 EMC QUALIFICATION BASIS
This section demonstrates that GA-ESI P/N 04034101-001 (High Range Area Monitor System)
is Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) qualified for operation in an industrial environment
similar to that found at TVA's Watt Bar Unit 2. The EMC qualification basis is established by
demonstrating that GA-ESI's EMC qualification tests on the radiation monitoring systems meets
the intent of the requirements for replacement radiation monitors.
The High Range Area Monitor System consists of
The Customer Connection Diagram (GA-ESI drawing 04034120) shows the major components
of the system as well as their electrical interconnections. The following subsections describe
the EMC Qualification Basis for the system as a whole; the NIM Bin Assembly consisting of the
RM-1000 Module, the I-F Converter Module, and the associated power supply; the RD-23
Detector; and the power line filter.
5.1 MONITOR SYSTEM QUALIFICATION BASIS
The monitor system uses the latest technology and components developed and tested to
ensure Electromagnetic Compatibility. have
been added to power input circuits and components that could generate noise, such as relays.
Tests have been conducted individually, using the latest standards available at the time, on the
radiation monitor's microprocessor and their associated detector.
GA-ESI has performed the tests on a Echannel RM-1000 radiation monitoring system the
configuration of which is shown in GA-ESI drawing 04509000 System Installation Configuration,
RFI/EMI Test, RM-1000 the results of which are issued in GA-ESI report 04038800, RM-1000
EMC Test Report, TVA and 04509050, RM-1000 EMC Test Report. The equipment tested used
an RM-1000 microprocessor radiation monitor Display/Control NIM Bin Assembly, an I-F
Converter, line filter, and an RD-23 detector. The monitor system being qualified is the same as
the monitor system tested and includes ECO-1 7656 modifications to ensure EMC compliance.
Table 5-1 lists the results for the tests performed, demonstrating that the tested radiation
monitoring system meets the intent of the requirements of TVA specification SS E18.14.01
Revision 3. The subsections that follow the table discuss results that require additional
explanation.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 29
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
Table 5-1 Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Results for RM-1 000, I-F Converter, and RD-23
Test Method Parameter TVA Requirement Results Section
Low Frequency Radiated Evaluate Frequency M 5.2.1
Susceptibility
High Frequency Radiated IEC 1000-4-3 Frequency 5.2.2
Susceptibility Amplitude **Low Frequency Conducted MIL-STD-461 D Frequency 5.3
Susceptibility (CS-1 01) Amplitude
High Frequency IEC 1000-4-6 Frequency 5.3.1
Conducted Susceptibility Amplitude
Surge Susceptibility IEC 1000-4-5 Test Level M
Impulse and Burst of IEC 1000-4-4 Test Level M 5.4
Impulses Susceptibility -E-Electrostatic Discharge IEC 1000-4-2 Contact MO
Air -EN
Radiated Emissions CENELEC Emission M 5.5
EN 55011
Group 1 Class
A
Conducted Emissions MIL-STD-461D Emission M 5.6
CE-102
5.2 RADIATED SUSCEPTIBILITY
TVA specification SS E18.14.01 R3 section 8.1 specifies the requirements to demonstrate the
equipment is not susceptible to low and high frequency radiated electromagnetic fields. The
frequency range specified is from This is divided into a low frequency range
fromr and a high frequency range from Each will be
discussed separately in the following subsections.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 30
25402-011-V1A-HARA-00190-001
5.2.1 Low Frequency Radiated Susceptibility
The low frequency electromagnetic fields found in control room area generally
Such is the case with the RM-1000, I-F Converter, power
supply, and line filter. They are installed i
The cable to the RD-23 is required to be installed in
and the RD-23 detector As further evidence that the
RM-1000 and I-F Converter are a
test was conducted as part of the EMC testing reported in GA-ESI report
04038800 in accordance with IEC 61000-4-8. A was swept
across the surface of the no susceptibilities found. The
High Range Area Monitor System is considered acceptable.
5.2.2 High Frequency Radiated Susceptibility
1 sets of tests demonstrate compliance with TVA specification SS E18.14.01 R3 section
8.1. The first test was conducted using ag detector and an RM-1000. In this case an
I-F Converter is not required and the pulses from the ietector are essentially the
same as theg from the I-F Converter. The EUT was subjected to af lfrom and from with sine wave modulation frequency of
and a ffrom the surface. The RM-1000 passed this test.
The second test was conducted using an RM-1000, I-F Converter, and an RD-23 ion chamber
detector. The EUT was subjected to a and from
with sine wave modulation frequency of and a distance of *surface. The RM-1000 and I-F Converter passed this test.
The third test was conducted with the same configuration as the second test. The EUT was
subjected to a with sine wave
and a from the surface. The RM-1 000 and I-F
Converter passed this test.
The above demonstrates that the RM-1000 is not susceptible to electric field strengths of Eand the I-F Converter from I-F Converter is not
susceptible to electric field strengths ofE g The I-F Converter has not
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 31
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
been tested at
5.3 CONDUCTED SUSCEPTIBILITY
The conducted susceptibility tests are divided into low frequency and high frequency tests. The
low frequency tests were conducted on the AC power lines without problems and passed the
requirements. The high frequency conducted susceptibility tests were run at • for the
RM-1000, I-F Converter, and the RD-23 ion chamber on the cables identified in the report
without problems. The TUV report does not include this test; however, it is reported in GA-ESI
report 04038800 section 7.A.
The RM-1000, I-F Converter, and RD-23 area monitor
system is considered to have passed this test at rms.
5.4 IMPULSE AND BURST IMPULSE SUSCEPTIBILITY
Electrical Fast Transient tests were conducted in accordance with IEC 1000-4-4 (IEC 801, part
4). The power lead test passed a= with the addition o on the
high voltage and signal leads to the RD-23 and is considered acceptable. The data cables were
tested attM. The tests were and all passed successfully
which corresponds to IEC 1000-4-4 severity level I and is consider appropriate for a "typical
industrial environment' such as a power plant. Evaluation is required to ensure that= on
data lines is within actual plant conditions.
5.5 RADIATED EMISSIONS
Tests were conducted in accordance with CENELEC EN 55011 Group 1, Class A from
Emissions were less than • over the frequency range with the
addition of cables. This is well below the EPRI TR-102323 Figure 7.4
requirements and is considered acceptable.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 32
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
5.6 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
Tests were conducted in accordance with MIL-STD-461D CE-102 from 10 kHz to 400 MHz on
each power line conductor. Emissions were well below Figure 7.2 of EPRI TR-102323 for
'Highest Composite Plant Emissions Envelope' and conducted emissions are considered
acceptable.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 33
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
6 SOFTWARE QUALIFICATION BASISThe RM-1000 software has been thoroughly Verified & Validated to the latest standards
available in 1998. Version 1.2 was approved for use in similar monitors delivered to Browns
Ferry Plant, based on TVA Specification SS-E18.15.01, Rev. 3.
Software Qualification for the TVA Replacement Radiation Monitors is based on the
requirements described in GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR section 3.5 for software
developed under a 10 CFR 50 Appendix B program. The qualification demonstrates that the
software V&V program meets the intent of RG1.152-2005 by describing the requested
information in TVA specification SS-E18.15.01, Rev. 3 section 5.2.
GA-ESI's software qualification program is in accordance with 10CFR 50 Appendix B. Formal
configuration control and error reporting fully meet the requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B as
well as 10CFR Part 21.
In the late 1990s, during the development of the RM-1000 Radiation Monitor, a formal
verification and validation program was completed to demonstrate that the RM-1000 meets all
regulatory and standards for safety related digital microprocessors. The standards and
regulatory documents used for this V&V program were:
* NRC Regulatory Guides: RG-1.152 R1(Jan 1996) and RG-1.153 R1(Jun 1996)
* ANSI/IEEE-ANS: 7-4.3.2-1982
* ANSI/ANS: 10.4-1987
0 ANSI/IEEE: 610.12-1990, 730.1-1989, 828-1990, 830-1984, 1012-1986,
1016-1987, 1028-1988, 1042-1987, and 1063-1987.
* IEC: 323-1.974
* EPRI: TR-102348 (March 1993), TR-102323 (Sept 1994)
The results of the V&V are reported in the following GA-ESI documents.
* 04507000 RM-1000 System Requirements Specification
0 04507001 RM-1000 Software Requirements Specification
* 04507006 RM-1000 System Test Procedure Specification
* 04507007-1 TR RM-100OSystem Verification Test Results
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 34
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
* 04507040
* 04507042
* 04507043
* 04507047
* 04508903-1TR
• 04508904
RM-1 000 System Test Plan / Test Design Specification
RM-1000 Software Verification and Validation Plan
RM-1000 Computer Program Development Plan
RM-1000 Software Quality Assurance Plan
Seismic Qualification Test Results
Functional Test Procedure for RM-1 000 and I/F Converter
These reports demonstrate that the RM-1000 Radiation Monitoring System software meets the
requirements for verification and validation of safety related software.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 35
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
GA-ESI DRAWINGS
04034100
04034101
04034120
OUTLINE, HIGH RANGE AREA MONITOR SYSTEM
HIGH RANGE AREA MONITOR SYSTEM
CUSTOMER CONNECTION DIAGRAM, HIGH RANGE AREA MONITOR
SYSTEM
GA-ESI DOCUMENTS
02818905-QSR
04038800
04238905-QSR
04507000
04507001
04507006
04507007-1 TR
04507040
04507042
04507043
04507047
04508903-1TR
04508904
04508905-OR
04508905-1S P
04508905-2SP
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR CLASS 1E
EQUIPMENT FOR WATTS BAR UNITS 1 & 2
RM-1000 EMC TEST REPORT, TVA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR CONTAINMENT
ATMOSPHERE, R-1 1/12
RM-1000 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION
RM-1000 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION
RM-1000 SYSTEM TEST PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION
RM-1000 SYSTEM VERIFICATION TEST RESULTS
RM-1000 SYSTEM TEST PLAN /TEST DESIGN SPECIFICATION
RM-1000 SOFTWARE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PLAN
RM-1000 COMPUTER PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RM-1000 SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
SEISMIC QUALIFICATION TEST RESULTS
FUNCTIONAL TEST PROCEDURE FOR RM-1 000 AND I/F CONVERTER
QUALIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR RM-1000 PROCESSOR MODULE AND
CURRENT-TO-FREQUENCY CONVERTER
SUPPLEMENT TO QUALIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR RM-1000 PROCESSOR
MODULE AND CURRENT-TO-FREQUENCY CONVERTER
SUPPLEMENT TO QUALIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR RM-1000 PROCESSOR
MODULE AND CURRENT-TO-FREQUENCY CONVERTER
-04038903-7SPRev C Page 36
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
E-254-0960
04038903-QSR
04238908
OP-4.0-130
OP-4.0-190
TEST REPORT CLASS 1E DESIGN QUALIFICATION TESTING OF ANALOG
HIGH RANGE RADIATION MONITOR (RD-23, RP-2C, RP-23, AND RP-20-01)
QUALIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT
UNIT 2 REPLACEMENT RADIATION MONITORS
SURGE PROTECTOR/FILTER SEISMIC ANALYSIS
ENGINEERING CHANGE ORDERS
MAINTENANCE OF THE ESI DATA BASE
-04038903-7SPRev C Page 37
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-00190-001
APPENDIX A POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY ANALYSIS
A.1 INTRODUCTION
This appendix analyzes the RM-1000 NIM Bin Power Supply Assembly to demonstrate that it
will maintain structural integrity during an earthquake at the Watts Bar Unit 2 Nuclear Power
Plant.
A.2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
04500850 POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY, 24V
BRACKET, POWER SUPPLY, 24V04502017
04502050-001
CEB-SS-5.10 R3
POWER SUPPLY, 24V
TVA SPECIFICATION FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION
OF ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND I&C DEVICES
A.3 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
Table A-1 lists the analysis performed and its associated subsection for the power supply
assembly. The worst case condition is the stress on the four screws attaching the power supply
assembly to the back of the RM-1000 NIM Bin module. The natural frequency of the power
supply bracket is calculated as well as the highest stress bracket cross section. The four
screws attaching the terminal block/fuse assembly to the bracket have much less stress than
the four screws being analyzed. They are the same size and hold much less weight. Figure A-
1 shows the power supply assembly and identifies the locations being analyzed.
Table A-1 List of Equipment Analyzed under Seismic Conditions
Equipment GA-ESI P/N Type of Analysis AppendixSection
Power Supply Assembly 04500850-001 Natural frequency of the power supply A7.3bracket
Analysis of screws attaching the power A7.4supply assembly to the back of the RM-1000 module.
Analysis of the bracket cross section A7T5
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 38
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
A.4 METHOD
GA-ESI's seismic analyses use the following conservative approach. The natural frequency of the
component being analyzed is determined, if feasible. Components in the rigid range (natural
frequencies greater than 33 hertz) use the Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA) times to provide
margin. If the natural frequency of the component being analyzed cannot be determined, the peak
acceleration found for the appropriate damping level on the RRS (ARS), plus any amplification,
multiplied by 0 is used. The result, of the method used, is the acceleration of the mass
concentrated at its center of gravity.
Power Supply Assembly is attached to the back of the NIM Bin module installed in the Control
Room panel which has high g low frequency accelerations in all directions. Therefore, the seismic
analysis uses the maximum acceleration shown in Figure 3-3 of = from • with a
multiplication factor of N for multimodal considerations.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 39
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
The frequency analysis for the Power Supply bracket
A.7.3 shows that the
acceleration shown in Figure 3-3 of = with a multij
analysis.
-in Sectionlowever the maximum
is used for the bracketplication factor of
Seismic forces (plus weight) are independently applied to the center of mass in the three
orthogonal axes that produce the highest stress in the part. The tensile and shear stresses are
calculated for each reaction. Stresses of the same type are combined using either the root of the
sum of their squares or their sum, if acting in the same direction. The maximum shear and tensile
stresses are then calculated and compared to the material allowable stresses.
In cases where a single RRS (ARS) is specified for the horizontal axis, the acceleration may be
taken as the maximum acceleration acting in one direction. The components can be analyzed for
the maximum acceleration acting separately in the x axis, the z axis, and at a 45 degree angle with
the x and z axis.
The analyses are performed using Microsoft Excel.
A.5 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
A.5.1 GA-ESI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
GA-ESI has established acceptance criteria for generic analysis of structural elements of radiation
monitoring system in order to use the analysis for most customer seismic conditions. These criteria
are conservative using generic RRS curves established for generic qualification testing. GA-ESI's
RRS are based on • and the accelerations used are given in Table A-2.
Table A-2 Required Accelerations for Generic Structural Analysis
Analysis Method Vertical Horizontal
Acceleration Acceleration
g's g's
Natural Frequency not Calculated or in the DynamicRange
Natural Frequency Calculated and in Rigid Range
Cabinet Dynamic Accelerations a x Figure 3-3)
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 40
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
GA-ESI uses the following conservative allowable stress relationships.
1. Total maximum allowable principal tensile stress is M times the yield strength of the
material.
2. Total maximum allowable principal shear stress is M imes the yield strength of the
material.
A.5.2 ALLOWABLE BOLT STRESS CALCULATIONS
The allowable stresses for ductile materials for non-pressure boundary members, welds, and
threaded fasteners are given by GA-ESI document 04038903-QSR:
a. Pure Shear:
b. Pure Tension
Where Su = minimum ultimate tensile strength
= applied shear stress
d tensile stress
A.6 CONCLUSIONS
The analyses, of the equipment listed in Table A-i, demonstrate that the equipment's design is
adequate and meets the acceptance criteria for both GA-ESI Generic and TVA Control Room
applications.
A.7 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS
The following subsections demonstrate the structural integrity of the equipment listed in Table
A-i. The subsections are organized as follows:
* A7.1 Given information and parameters
* A7.2 Calculation of the mass of the bracket and attached components
* A7.3 Calculation of the power supply bracket natural frequency
04038903-7SP
RevC Page 41
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
* A7.4
* A7.5
Analysis of screws attaching the bracket to the RM-1000 module
Analysis of power supply bracket
A.7.1 GIVEN INFORMATION AND PARAMETERS
Table A-3 provides information regarding the strength of the materials being analyzed and the
seismic accelerations to be used for the analyses. Note: for the generic analysis the horizontal
acceleration is resolved to an x-axis and z-axis component by taking its RMS value at a 45
degree angle.
Table A-3 Given Information and Parameters
DESCRIPTION VARIABLE VALUE UNITS NOTES
Vertical Acceleration av g's 1
Horizontal Acceleration ah g's 1
Screw (ASTM A581-75 303SS) yield Sy-screw psi 2
Screw (ASTM A581-75 303SS) tensile St-screw psi 2, 3
Bracket Material (300 series SS) yield Sy-bracket psi 2, 3
Bracket Material (300 series SS) tensile St-bracket psi 2
Screw Area (6-32UNC-2A) Ascrw sq in 2
Notes:
1. Natural frequency calculated and in the rigid range,
2. Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers 7 th edition
3. Lowest tensile and yield for all 300 series SS.
A.7.2 POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY MASS
Table A-4 is a list of the power supply assembly parts and the components that are attached to
the power supply bracket and their masses. The calculation of the mass of the power supply
assembly and its components is basis on known weights, calculated weights, and conservative
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 42
25402-011 -VIA-HARA-001 90-001
estimates for items where weights were not found. A • has been added for
miscellaneous items and unknown weights.
Table A-4 Power Supply Assembly Mass
Description GA-ESI P/N Weight Units Notes
Power Supply Bracket 04502017-001 lbs 1
Power Supply Plate 04502017-002 lbs 1
Power Supply 04502050-001 - lbs 2
Fuse holder 50004078-001 lbs 3
Fuse 50008728-001 lbs 3
Terminal Block, 6 pos 50015642-001 lbs 3
Hardware (screws, washers, retainers) Various lbs 3
Wire Various - lbs 3
Margin (10%) --- lbs
Total m, w lbs
Notes:
2.
3.-
A.7.3 NATURAL FREQUENCY OF THE POWER SUPPLY BRACKET
Table A-5 analyzes the natural frequency of the power supply bracket. The up-down direction is
0therefore, the side-to-side direction is analyzed for
the first natural frequency. The power supply is
Ifrequency. The power supply is considered
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 43
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
Table A-5 Natural Frequency of the Power Supply Bracket
Description Formula Value Units Notes
Modulus of Elasticity 303 SS E psi 2
Moment of Inertia m_
Graviational Acceleration g in/sec 2
End Load W lbs
Length of the bracket 1 K in
Weight of bracket per inch W lbs/in
Natural Frequency Hz 3
Notes:
1. The natural frequency is calculated in the
2.
3.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page44
25402-011 -V1 A-HARA-001 90-001
A.7.4 ANALYSIS OF SCREWS ATTACHING POWER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY TO RM-1000
This subsection analyzes the screws that attach the power supply assembly to the back of the
RM-1000 NIM Bin. The analysis is performed using the TVA accelerations which are similar to
the GA-ESI generic accelerations for the same location. The analysis, shown in Table A-6,
includes both GA-ESI and TVA allowable stresses. Figure A-2 shows the power supply
assembly, the center of mass, and forces acting on the center of mass and screws.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 45
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
Table A-6 Analysis of Screws Attaching Power Supply Assembly to NIM Bin
Description Formula Value Units Notes
x dimension X in
y Dimension K in
Y
y Distance between screws K in
z Distance between screws II in
Force x and Reaction x lbf
Force y and Reaction y lbf
Force z and Reaction z - lbf
Moment x
Moment y
Moment z
in-lbs
= in-lbs I
Iuin-ibs
Tensile force on each screw lbf
Tensile Stress on each screw psi
Shear force on each screw lbf
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 46
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
Description Formula Value Units Notes
Shear Stress on each screw psi
Combined Maximum Tensile psiStress
Combined Maximum Shear psi
GA-ESI Generic Tensile - psiAllowable
GA-ESI Generic Shear psiAllowable
Tensile Allowable psi
Shear Allowable psi
Combined Allowable psi
Notes:1. Conservative Estimate
A.7.5 ANALYSIS OF POWER SUPPLY BRACKET
This subsection analyzes the power supply bracket. The analysis is performed using the TVA
accelerations which are similar to the GA-ESI generic accelerations for the same location. The
analysis, shown in Table A-7, includes both GA-ESI and TVA allowable stresses. Figure A-3
shows the power supply assembly, the center of mass, and forces acting on the center of mass
and screws.
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 47
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
Table A-7 Analysis of Power Supply Bracket
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 48
25402-011 -VI A-HARA-001 90-001
Description Formula Value Units Notes
-~1 f 4
Force x and Reaction x lbf
Force y and Reaction y lbf
Force z and Reaction z lbf
Area of the each bracketsection Ab
sq in
Moment y
Moment z
4 +
U in-lbs
+
U in-lbs
Tensile force on each bracketsection
Tensile Stress on each bracketsection
Shear force on each bracketsection
Ibf
Ipsi
- lbf
Shear Stress on eachsection
bracket U psi
Combined Maximum Tensile * psiStress -own_
___
Combined Maximum Shear - psiStress-
GA-ESI Generic Tensile - psiAllowable
GA-ESI Generic Shear - psiAllowable
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 49
25402-011-VIA-HARA-00190-001
Notes:1.•
04038903-7SP
Rev C Page 50