Page 1
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LNG2014-1176
1
Athens Institute for Education and Research
ATINER
ATINER's Conference Paper Series
AGR2014-1218
Wayner Montero-Carmona
Professor
Technological Institute of Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Victor M. Jimenez
Professor
University of Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Vanilla Protoplasts:
Isolation and Electrofusion
Page 2
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
An Introduction to
ATINER's Conference Paper Series ATINER started to publish this conference papers series in 2012. It includes only the papers submitted for publication after they were presented at one of the conferences organized by our Institute every year. The papers published in the series have not been refereed and are published as they were submitted by the author. The series serves two purposes. First, we want to disseminate the information as fast as possible. Second, by doing so, the authors can receive comments useful to revise their papers before they are considered for publication in one of ATINER's books, following our standard procedures of a blind review. Dr. Gregory T. Papanikos President Athens Institute for Education and Research
This paper should be cited as follows: Montero-Carmona, W. and Jimenez, V.M., (2014) "Vanilla Protoplasts:
Isolation and Electrofusion”, Athens: ATINER'S Conference Paper Series, No:
AGR2014-1218.
Athens Institute for Education and Research
8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece Tel: + 30 210 3634210 Fax: + 30 210 3634209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr URL Conference Papers Series: www.atiner.gr/papers.htm Printed in Athens, Greece by the Athens Institute for Education and Research. All
rights reserved. Reproduction is allowed for non-commercial purposes if the source is
fully acknowledged. ISSN: 2241-2891 05/09/2014
Page 3
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
3
Vanilla Protoplasts:
Isolation and Electrofusion
Wayner Montero-Carmona
Professor
Technological Institute of Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Victor M. Jimenez
Professor
University of Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Abstract The vanilla plant is an orchid mainly commercialized for the production of
vanillin. This compound is considered the second largest natural flavoring source in
the world. In recent years, price of vanillin has increased considerably, which has
generated the necessity of improving the quality of the plant materials. There are few
works related to the isolation, fusion and regeneration of protoplasts in vanilla, not
allowing to boost the benefits that this technique can generate for crop breeding. This
work presents efficient protocols for protoplast isolation and fusion from leaf and
protocorm like bodies (PLBs) of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia and Vanilla pompona) in
order to contribute to the genetic improvement of the genus.
A three-week pre-treatment in the dark was standardized before placing the
explants in an osmotic solution (0.06 M MES, 0.4 M mannitol, pH 5.7) for one hour at 50
r.p.m. This solution was then replaced with different enzymatic solutions for three hours at
25 ± 1 ºC and 50 r.p.m. The isolated protoplasts were filtered (320 mesh), centrifuged (100
xg for 5 min) and re-suspended in a 0.6 M sucrose solution. Subsequently, a washing
solution (50% MS salts with 0.03 M MES and 0.2 M mannitol, pH 5.7) was added to
separate protoplasts by flotation-centrifugation. Protoplasts ̀ viability was evaluated with
0.01% Evans blue. Enzymatic solution containing 1% cellulase, 1% pectolyase and
0.5% hemicellulase (pH 5.7) yielded the highest amount of protoplasts from V. planifolia
leaf explants (2,9 x105 ± 0,7 x10
5 protoplasts/g fresh weight, with a viability of 81%) and
from PLBs (2,8 x105 ± 0,7 x10
5 protoplasts/g fresh weight, viability 80%). In V. pompona,
yields of 2,8 x105 ± 0,8 x10
5 protoplasts/g fresh weight from leaf explants (viability 79%)
and 2,5 x105 ± 0,8 x10
5 protoplasts/g fresh weight from PLBs (viability 79%) were obtained.
For electrofusion, a hypoosmolar solution (Eppendorf®, HA, AL) was used, and
the alignment and fusion parameters were standardized. The fusion parameters U1 = 8
V, 60 s; A = 170 V, 30 µs, n 3; U2 = 8 V, 60 s generated the highest number of fusion
events (8.9%). Highest number of microcalli (plating efficiency 9.4%) was observed
on media containing 50% MS salts supplemented with MS vitamins, 1% CaCl2,
1 mg/L benzyladenine, 1 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 0.2 M mannitol, 0.03
M 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, 1 g/L hydrolyzed casein, 20 g/L sucrose,
and 6.2 g/L agar as a gelling agent (pH 5.7) in diffuse light (16 hours to 1000 lux).
Keywords: Protoplasts, isolation, electrofusion, V. planifolia, V. pompona.
Acknowledgments: Authors want to thank the Consejo Nacional de Rectores
(CONARE) in Costa Rica by partially funding this investigation.
Page 4
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
4
Introduction
In recent years, the international price of natural vanilla has been
increasing considerably. For 2011, the Gross Production Value of vanilla was
US$ 24 million. Production Value was highest in 2005, when it reached US$
51 million (vanilla benefit) caused by the 2004 tsunami; in 2007 it dropped
back to US$ 16 million and since 2008 it has stabilized. With these prices, the
vanilla global area planted grew up 4.9% between 2001 and 2011 (FAOSTAT
2014), and the world demand increased to 12 000 tons per year (Dignum et al.
2001). However, the global production of natural vanilla has only increased by
473 tons per year (average), being the deficit covered by synthetic compounds
(Havkin et al. 2004, Havkin and Frenckel 2006).
Traditionally, vanilla is propagated by cuttings (Besse et al. 2004);
however, this process can be performed only on a small scale, due to the
mechanical transmission of diseases. In addition, the collection of stem cuttings
prevents that mother plants can be exploited for production (Parra 1987).
Because of these reasons, it is difficult to meet the demand of plants through
this technique. Therefore, micropropagation has been presented as an
alternative to solve the shortage of vegetative propagules (George and
Ravishankar 1997, Geetha and Shetty 2000, Giridhar et al. 2001).
Currently, due to the profitability of the vanilla production and the high
susceptibility of commercial materials to the wilt caused by Fusarium
oxysporum and Phytophthora meadii or Sclerotium rolfsii (Parthasarathy et al.
2005, Pinaria et al. 2010), there is an increasing interest interest for the
production of new and better vanilla materials. Some in vitro non-conventional
breeding techniques can facilitate the production of new genotypes that better
fulfill the producers’ needs. This may be the case of the protoplast fusion
technique, which has proved its potential in the development of new materials
in several plant species (Szabados 1991). The main objective of this work was
to establish protocols for the isolation, culture and protoplasts fusion of two
species of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia and Vanilla pompona).
Methodology
Study Location
Research was conducted at the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory of the
Sustainable Agriculture in the Humid Tropics Research and Development
Center (CIDASTH), the Molecular Biology Laboratory of the Science and
Letters School at the Technological Institute of Costa Rica (San Carlos,
Alajuela) and the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory of the Grain and Seed
Research Center (CIGRAS) located at the University of Costa Rica (Ciudad
Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro de Montes de Oca).
Plant Material
Worked was conducted with V. planifolia (G Jackson, 2n=32) and V.
pompona (Schiede, 2n=32) material established in vitro at the ITCR San
Page 5
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
5
Carlos. Plants were multiplied in order to obtain leaf material and protocorm
like bodies (PLBs) in both vanilla species for protoplast isolation, culture and
fusion testing. These tissues were used because of their high regenerative
capacity, which was confirmed in previous studies (Alatorre 2002; Palama et
al. 2010).
For PLB induction, root-tip explants were used. They were placed inverted
(negative geotropism) on a medium containing MS salts (Murashige and Skoog
1962) supplemented with 1 mg/L, 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), 1 g/L
hydrolyzed casein (CH), 0,5 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 30
g/L sucrose and 8 g/L of agar as gelling agent. To obtain leaf tissue, in vitro
plants were used. They were placed on medium containing MS salts,
supplemented with 1 mg/L BA, 1 g/L CH, 30 g/L sucrose and 8 g/L agar as
gelling agent. Explants were cultured at 27 ± 1 °C; with a 16 hours
(8.6 μmol/m2s) photoperiod, and subcultured regularly every 30 days (Montero
2009).
Protoplast Isolation
For the isolation of protoplasts, three procedures (optimization of the
isolation protocol, purification of isolated protoplasts and enzymatic assays)
needed to be defined. A pretreatment of three weeks in the darkness was
standardized prior to placing the explants, leaf fragments (1 g, segmented in
squares of 0.3 x 0.3 cm) or poorly differentiated PLBs (1 g), in the osmotic
solution (0.06 M MES and 0.4 M mannitol, pH 5.7) for one hour.
Subsequently, this solution was replaced with the enzyme solution described in
table 1 for three and four hours at 28 °C. Both processes were performed in the
dark at 50 rpm. The isolated protoplasts were filtered (320 mesh), centrifuged
and washed three times by gentle centrifugation (800 rpm, 100 xg) for 5 min in
washing solution (50% MS salts with 0.03 M MES and 0.2 M mannitol at pH
5.7). Protoplast were resuspended in 1 mL of washing solution and carefully
overlaid on 5 mL of floating solution containing 0.6 M sucrose and 0.03 M
MES (pH 5,7) before final centrifugation. Protoplasts were removed using a
Pasteur pipette from the interface of the two solutions and were resuspended in
washing solution.
Page 6
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
6
Table 1. Enzyme Concentrations Evaluated for Isolation of Protoplasts from
Vanilla Leaf Explants and PLBs Protoplast Isolation.
Enzyme Solution 1
Cellulase 2 Pectolyase
3 Hemicellulase
3 Macerozyme
2
A 0.8% 0.5% 0.2% ---
B 1% 1% 0.5% ---
C 1% --- --- 0.5%
D 1% --- --- 1.0%
E 1% --- --- 1.5%
F 2% --- --- 0.5% 1 Enzymatic treatments (0.01 M MES + 0.7 M mannitol, pH 5.7) were adapted from
Szabados (1991), Price and Earle (1984) and Seeni and Abraham (1986, cited by Arditti and
Ernst 1993). 2 Karlan Biochemicals, AR, EEUU.
3 MP Biomedicals, CA, EEUU
The process efficiency was evaluated by means of the yield of isolated
protoplasts per g of tissue, using a Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. The treatments
were distributed in a completely randomized design, factorial arrangement of
treatments 6 x 2 (enzyme solutions x hours) and nine replicates per treatment.
Each experimental unit consisted of a Petri dish with 4 mL of solution.
Analysis of variance and comparison of means (Tukey, α = 0.05) were
performed using the SAS System ® (Proc GLM) program.
Viability Tests
The number of viable protoplasts per g of tissue was determined with the
Evans blue test (Gaff and Okong´o-Omgola 1971). For this purpose, 200 µL of
the protoplast suspension were placed for 10 min on a hanging drop slide. One
Evans blue 0.01% drop (approximately 100 µL) was subsequently added and
allowed to stand for 20 min. The viability was assessed by the percentage ratio
between the number of viable protoplasts and the number of isolated
protoplasts per g of tissue, using a Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. A descriptive
analysis was performed using percentages obtained during tests. Each
experimental unit consisted of 200 µL of protoplast suspension (at a
concentration of 1 x105 protoplasts/mL) with six replicates per treatment.
Protoplasts Electrofusion
Isolated and purified protoplasts were centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5
minutes, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was suspended in
hypoosmolar solution (Eppendorf ®, AH, GE) to a concentration of 1 x10
6
protoplasts/mL. Alignment and Testing electrofusion process (2 MHz, 100
V/cm) was performed on mesophyll protoplasts - etiolated PLBs mixtures from
the two species tested (V. planifolia + V. pompona).
To determine the necessary alignment voltage (U1), 200 µL of each
protoplast mixture were placed on the electrofusion chamber (see Figure 1).
Different AC voltages (5 to 10 V increased by 1 V) at constant 60 seconds
were evaluated. A descriptive analysis was performed using alignment rates
observed in the visual field of the microscope during tests. Each experimental
Page 7
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
7
unit consisted of 200 µL protoplast suspension with six replicates per
treatment.
Figure 1. Equipment Used for Electrofusion of Protoplasts Obtained from
Vanilla Leaf Explants and PLBs (A. Workstation; B. Electrofusion Chamber,
40X; C. Helix Chamber)
For the electrofusion process, different fusion parameters (Table 2) were
evaluated. Process efficiency was evaluated by the number of fusion events
counted (200 µL at 1 x106 protoplasts/mL) during the post-alignment (U2) in
the electrofusion chamber. Fusion events were performed with protoplasts from
different explants (V. planifolia leaf segments and PLBs V. pompona or vice
versa) in order to facilitate the identification (by coloration or size) of fusion
events obtained by microscopic observations. The treatments were evaluated
by descriptive analysis of efficiency rates observed in the visual field of the
microscope during tests. Each experimental unit consisted of 200 µL of fusion
events in solution with six replicates per treatment.
Table 2. Electrofusion Parameters Used for Vanilla Protoplasts Obtained from
Leaf Explants and PBLs (Modified from Montero, 2009)
Parameter Fusion (Un)
Voltage (V) Time (μs) n 1
A 170 25 2
B 170 25 3
C 170 30 2
D 170 30 3 1 n = number of DC pulses which underwent fusion events.
Once the proper alignment voltage was established, fusion tests were
performed with the parameters described above. For this, approximately
700 µL protoplast mixtures were placed in the Helix electrofusion chamber
(Figure 1). Finally, 700 µL, containing fusion events were pipetted and plated
on culture medium for subsequent regeneration.
Page 8
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
8
Culture and Regeneration of Fusion Events
The fusion products were distributed by dripping on culture medium
containing 50% MS salts supplemented with MS vitamins, 1% CaCl2, 1 mg/L
BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.2 M mannitol, 0.03 M MES, 1 g/L CH, 20 g/L sucrose
and 6.2 g/L of agar as gelling agent (pH 5.7). Osmotic potential was gradually
decreased (every third day) by adding fresh medium with variations of
50% (0.1 M), 25% (0.05 M) and without mannitol added to the culture medium
as an osmotic regulator. Microcalli were grown at 25 ± 2 °C in diffuse light
conditions (16 h light photoperiod, 4.3 μmol/m2s). The process was evaluated
by the efficiency rates between the number of protoplasts presenting cell
division and the amount of protoplasts placed (1 mL at 1 x106 protoplasts/mL).
Each experimental unit consisted of 700 μL protoplast solution with six
replicates per treatment.
Results and Discussion
Protoplasts Isolation
Once the isolation and purification protocols were optimized (see
Montero 2009), the different enzyme solutions were tested, in order to
maximize the protoplasts yield. Experiments were first conducted with leaf
explants of the two vanilla species studied. Afterwards, the best enzyme
solution was used for PBL protoplast isolation.
For V. planifolia protoplast isolation, the enzyme solution B (1% cellulase,
1% hemicellulase and 0.5% pectolyase) showed the highest yields for 3 to 4
hours of digestion (4.1 x105 ± 0.3 x10
5 and 3.2 x10
5 ± 0.2 x10
5 protoplasts/g
tissue, respectively, Figure 2). The lowest number of protoplasts was obtained
with the enzyme solution E (1% cellulase and 1.5% macerozyme), with
0.5 x105 ± 0.1 x10
5 protoplasts/g tissue at 4 hours digestion (see Figure 2).
Similarly, the V. pompona protoplast isolation showed the highest yields with
in the enzyme solution B for 3 and 4 hours of digestion (4.0 x105 ± 0.4 x10
5
and 3.2 x105 ± 0.3 x10
5 protoplasts/g tissue, respectively). The lowest number
of isolated protoplasts was obtained with the enzyme solution D (1 % cellulase
and 1% macerozyme) with 4 hours digestion, presenting yields of 0.4 x105 ±
0.2 x105 protoplasts/g tissue (see Figure 3).
Page 9
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
9
Figure 2. Protoplast Number Obtained from Six Enzyme Solutions Evaluated
in V. planifolia (3 and 4 Hours Digestion). Similar Letters Indicate Absence of
Significant Differences (Tukey, P = 0.0001). Bars Represent the Standard
Deviation
Figure 3. Protoplast Number obtained from six enzyme solutions evaluated in
V. pompona (3 and 4 hours digestion). Similar letters indicate absence of
significant differences (Tukey, P = 0.0001). Bars represent the standard
deviation
Yields obtained during V. planifolia protoplast isolation from leaf
mesophyll in this study were similar to those reported by Price and Earle
(1984), with values up to 1.8 x105 protoplasts/g fresh leaf tissue using an
Page 10
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
10
enzyme solution of 2% celulisine with digestion times of five hours.
Divakaran et al. (2008) reported performance of up to 2.5 x105 protoplasts/g
for V. planifolia leaf tissue, using purified enzyme solution of cellulase 2% and
0.5% macerozyme digestion with periods up to 8 hours. No data on
V. pompona protoplast isolation has been reported in the literature up to now.
However, the number of protoplasts isolated in this study was similar to that
reported for V. planifolia (Price and Earle 1984) and V. wightiana (1.6 x105
protoplasts/g fresh tissue; Seeni and Abraham 1986, cited by Arditti and Ernst
1993).
In monocots, the cell wall has a large number and variety on
hemicelluloses and a smaller range of pectins (Ishii, 1989). This composition
possibly facilitated the digestion with pectolyase and hemicellulase, increasing
the yield of isolated protoplasts in both species at the highest concentrations
tested for these enzymes (1% and 0.5% respectively). According to Ishii
(1989), although the presence of cellulase is sufficient for the degradation of
the cell wall in monocots, addition of pectolyase improved performance on the
isolated protoplast yield. In V. andamica, adding hemicellulase increased the
number of protoplasts isolated from leaf explants (Divakaran et al. 2008).
Utilization of the enzyme solution B for the isolation of protoplasts from
PLBs showed the following yields: For V. planifolia, 2.9 x105 0.7 x10
5
protoplasts/g tissue, and for V. pompona 2.5 x105 0.8 x10
5 protoplasts/g
tissue (see Figure 4). No significant differences (Tukey, P = 0.7407) occurred
between the two vanilla species evaluated when enzyme solution B was used,
while highest yields were consistently obtained with leaf explants.
Protoplasts isolated from leaf explants, in both V. planifolia and V.
pompona, showed characteristic green color of the chloroplasts presence in
mesophyll cells. Protoplasts isolated from PBLs exhibited a creamy color due
to the absence of chloroplasts and the presence of protoplastids (see Figure 5).
Figure 4. Number of Protoplasts Obtained in the Isolation from Two Explants
(Leaf and PLB) in the Two Vanilla Species Tested (3 Hours of Digestion) with
Enzyme Solution B. Similar Letters Indicates Absence of Significant
Differences (Tukey, P < 0.05). The Bars Represent the Standard Deviation
Page 11
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
11
Figure 5. Protoplasts Obtained from Two Explants (Leaf and PLB) in the Two
Vanilla Species Tested (After 3 Hour Digestion with Enzyme Solution B, 100X)
Viability Tests
Viability tests were performed by applying 0.01% Evans´ blue as
described by Gaff and Okong'o-Omgola (1971). In this test the dye enters the
cytoplasm of isolated protoplasts. After half an hour, the dye was removed
from viable protoplasts, while non-viable protoplasts remain with a darker blue
staining (see Figure 6).
Figure 6. Viability Testing Performed with 0.01% Evans´ Blue on Vanilla
Purified Protoplasts (VP: Viable Protoplast; NVP: Non-Viable Protoplast;
400X)
It was determined that the viability exhibited by leaf protoplasts was
76% for V. planifolia and 78% for V. pompona. For PLBs, the viability
exhibited was 75% and 77%, respectively (see Figure 7).
Page 12
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
12
The viability measured by 0.01% Evans´ blue depends primarily on the
ability of plasmalemma of living or viable protoplasts to expel the dye from the
cytoplasm, while non-viable or dead protoplasts retain the blue color inside
(Gaff and Okong'o-Omgola 1971). High viability ratios increase the possibility
of higher numbers of protoplasts regenerating their cell walls, which is a
prerequisite for cell division under culture (Yasugi 1989). According to
Divakaran et al. (2008), viability evaluated by fluorescein diacetate (FDA)
showed a value of 72% for V. planifolia protoplasts, whereas for V. andamica
it was 55%. The data obtained in this study shows great similarity with
viability measured in a previous study (Montero 2009) for V. planifolia and V.
pompona (between 75% and 81%).
Figure 7. Viability Measured with 0.01% Evans´ Blue on Purified Protoplasts
from Two Explants (Leaf and PLB) in the Two Vanilla Species Tested
Protoplasts Electrofusion
Prior to fusion, alignment tests were performed in order to evaluate the
effect of voltage on the alignment rate (see Figure 8). All voltage parameters
evaluated on hipoosmolar solution showed alignment events. The 8 V test
presented the highest number of alignments (21.87%) compared to other
voltages evaluated (see Figure 9).
Page 13
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
13
Figure 8. Alignment of Purified Protoplasts from Two Explants (V. planifolia
Leaf and V. pompona PLB, 40X)
Figure 9. Alignment Rate of Protoplasts Between Two Explants (V. planifolia
Leaf and V. pompona PLB). Bars Represent the Standard Deviation
Once alignment voltage was established, electrofusion tests were
conducted. Within these tests, alignment (U1) and post-alignment (U2)
parameters were set to 8 V under standardized 60 seconds, in order to define
the electrofusion parameters assay (Un, see Table 2). Among the electrofusion
conditions evaluated, the highest of fusion events rate (8.9%) was observed
with the D parameters (Un = 170 V, 30 microseconds, n 3) compared to the
other treatments evaluated (see Figure 10).
During the alignment process, the protoplasts migrated due to bipolar
charge generated by the alternating current applied; forming chains of aligned
protoplasts (see Figure 8). Standardized periods of alignment and post-
alignment allowed formation of higher number of chains, which facilitated the
Page 14
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
14
process of electrofusion. By applying a direct current to the formed chains
(Un), the plasmalems regions from different protoplasts that were in contact
suffered localized electroporation due to this voltage (Biedinger et al. 1990,
Van Wert and Saunders 1992, Blackhall et al. 1996). In a low conductivity
medium, such as the hypoosmolar solution, media prevents that the voltage
exceed the critical electric field needed for electrofusion, preventing the
destruction of protoplasts (Jaroszeski et al. 1994).
Figure 10. Electrofusion Efficiency Observed when Evaluating Different
Electrofusion Parameters with Purified Protoplasts from Two Explants (Leaf and
PLB) for Both Vanilla Species Studied. Similar Letters Indicate Absence of
Significant Differences (Tukey, P < 0.05). Bars Represent the Standard Deviation
Culture and Regeneration of Fusion Events
Preliminary studies (see Montero 2009) allowed optimization of the
culture conditions for fusion events. Therefore, fusion events were directly
plated on the agar medium described below and maintained with diffuse light.
Fusion parameters D (A = 170 V, 30 µs, n 3) showed the highest microcalli
number observed (9.4%), while fusion parameters A (A = 170 V, 25 µs, n 2)
produced the lowest number of microcalli (see Figure 11). Microcalli grew
constantly for 12 weeks after been plated (see Figure 12).
To culture fusion events obtained from V. planifolia and V. andamica,
Divakaran et al. (2008) proposed the use of liquid MS salts and vitamins,
supplemented with 0.5 mg/L of BA, 0.5 mg/L of indole-3-butyl acid (IBA), 7%
mannitol and 3% sucrose (pH 5.7), under agitation. Yasugi (1989) reported the
importance of supplying plant growth regulators (NAA, BA and 2,4-D) to
stimulate the growth of microcalli obtained by fusion between Dendrobium,
Epidendrum, Paphiopedilum and Cattleya.
Page 15
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
15
Figure 11. Regeneration Efficiency for Protoplast Fusion Events between Two
Explants (V. planifolia Leaf and V. pompona PLB). Similar Letters Indicate
Absence of Significant Differences (Tukey, P < 0.05). Bars Represent the
Standard Deviation
Figure 12. Developed Microcallus from Fusion Events between V. planifolia
Leaf Protoplasts and V. pompona PLB Protoplasts (12 Weeks After Been
Plated, 40X)
In this study, microcalli were cultured on a 50% MS semi-solid medium
supplemented with 50% MS vitamins, 1% CaCl2, 1 mg/L BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D,
0.2 M mannitol, 0.03 M MES, 1 g/L CH, 20 g/L sucrose and 6.2 g/L of agar as
gelling agent (pH 5.7) in order to stimulate their regeneration. The gradual
reduction of osmotic potential by adding fresh medium allowed microcalli
growth. The microcalli resulted from fusion events are currently being
maintained at the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory of the CIDASTH to promote
their growth and development, looking at their regeneration, and evaluation to
determine the presence of somatic hybrids.
Page 16
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
16
References
Alatorre, F. 2002. Estudio morfogénico e histológico del híbrido Vanilla fragans x
Vanilla pompona Schieden obtenido in vitro. Tesis Bach. Agr. Chapingo, MX,
Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. p. 86
Arditti, J; Ernst, R. 1993. Micropropagation of orchids. Ontario, CA, Wiley
Intersciece. 696 p.
Besse, P; Da Silva, D; Bory, S; Grisoni, M; Le Bellec, F and Duval, MF. 2004. RAPD
genetic diversity in cultivated vanilla: Vanilla planifolia, and relationships with
V. tahitensis and V. pompona. Plant Science 167(2):79–385. DOI = http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168945204001645
Biedinger, U; Youngman, RJ; Schnabl, H. 1990. Differential effects of electrofusion
and electropermeabilization parameters on the membrane integrity of plant
protoplasts. Planta 180(4):598 – 602. DOI = http://link.springer.com/article/10.
1007/BF02411459
Blackhall, NW; Davey, MR; Power, JB. 1996. Applications of protoplast technology.
In Dixon, R; Gonzales, R eds. Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach. Oxford,
GB, Oxford University Press. 27 – 38.
Dignum, M; Kerler, J and Verpoorte, R. 2001. Vanilla production: technological,
chemical, and biosynthetic aspects. Food Reviews International 17:119 - 120.
DOI = http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/FRI-100000269#.U5Rczih
A4YM
Divakaran, M; Geetha, SP; Nirmal Babu, K; Peter, KV. 2008. Isolation and fusion of
protoplasts in Vanilla species. Current Science 94:115 – 120. DOI = http://www.
currentscience.ac.in/php/toc.php?vol=094&issue=01
FAOSTAT (Statistics Division of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations). 2014. Vanilla: Statistical Information, FAOSTAT. DOI = http://faostat.
fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor
Gaff, DF; Okong`o-Omgola, O. 1971. The use of non-permeating pigments for testing
the survival of cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 22(3):756 – 758.
DOI = http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/3/756.full.pdf
Geetha, S and Shetty, S. 2000. In vitro propagation of Vanilla planifolia, a tropical
orchid. Current Science 79(6):886 – 889. DOI = http://www.currentscience.ac.in/
php/toc.php?vol=079&issue=06
George, P and Ravishankar, G. 1997. In vitro multiplication of Vanilla planifolia
using axillary bud explants. Plant Cell Reports 16(7):490 – 494. DOI =http://
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01092772
Giridhar, P; Obul, B and Ravishankar, G. 2001. Silver nitrate influences in vitro shoot
multiplication and root formation in Vanilla planifolia Andrews. Current
Science 81(9):1166 – 1170. DOI = http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/toc.php?
vol=081&issue=09
Havkin, D; French, J; Graft, N; Pak, F; Frenkel, Ch and Joel, D. 2004.
Interrelation of curing and botany in vanilla (Vanilla planifolia) bean. Acta
Horticulturae 629:93 – 102. DOI = http://www.actahort.org/books/629/629_12.h tm
Havkin, D and Frenkel, Ch. 2006. Postharvest handling and storage of cured vanilla
beans. Stewart Postharvest Review 4:1 – 9. DOI = http://www.stewartposthar
vest.com/Archives/Archives_Issue4_August2006.htm
Ishii, S. 1989. Enzymes for the isolation of protoplasts. In Bajaj, Y ed. Biotechnology
in Agriculture and Forestry. 8v. Heidelberg, DE, Springer-Verlag Berlin. 23–33
p.
Page 17
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: AGR2014-1218
17
Jaroszeski, MJ; Gilbert, R; Fallon, PG; Séller, R. 1994. Mechanically facilitated cell-
cell electrofusion. Biophysical Journal 67(4):1574 – 1581. DOI = http://www.
cell.com/biophysj/abstract/S0006-3495%2894%2980630-7
Montero, W. 2009. Aislamiento, cultivo y fusión de protoplastos en dos especies de
vainilla (Vanilla planifolia y Vanilla pompona). Tesis M.Sc. Ciencias Agrícolas y
Recursos Naturales con énfasis en Biotecnología, CR, Universidad de
Costa Rica. p. 89
Murashige, T; Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with
tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum 15(3):473 – 497. DOI = http://
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x/abstract
Palama, T; Menard, P; Fock, I; Choi, YH; Bourdon, E; Govinden-Soulange, J; Bahut,
M; Payet, B; Verpoorte, R and Kodja, H. 2010. Shoot differentiation from
protocorm callus cultures of Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae): proteomic and
metabolic responses at early stage. Plant Biology 10:82-100 DOI = http://www.
biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/10/82
Parra, R. 1987. Cultivo in vitro y anatomía de óvulos de vainilla (Vanilla planifolia
Andrews). Tesis. M.Sc. Chapingo, MX, Colegio de Postgraduados. 104 p.
Parthasarathy, VA; Anandaraj, M; Rema, J; Sasikumar, B; Suseela Bhai, R; Rajeev, P
and Dinesh R. 2005. Vanilla (Extension Pamphlet). Calicut, IN, Indian Institute
of Spices Research. 11 pp. DOI = http://www.spices.res.in/index.php?option=
com_content&view=article&id=141&Itemid=66
Pinaria, AG; Liew, ECY and Burgess, LW. 2010. Fusarium species associated with
vanilla stem rot in Indonesia. Australasian Plant Pathology 39(2): 176-183
DOI = http://link.springer.com/article/10.1071/AP09079
Price, G; Earle, E. 1984. Sources of orchid protoplasts for fusion experiments.
American Orchid Society Bulletin 53:1035 – 1043.
Szabados, L. 1991. Protoplastos: aislamiento, cultivo y regeneración de plantas. In
Roca, W; Mroginski, L. Eds. Cultivo de tejidos en la agricultura: Fundamentos y
aplicaciones. Cali, CO, CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, CO).
p. 239 – 270. DOI = http://exa.unne.edu.ar/biologia/fisiologia.vegetal/cultivo_de
_tejidos.htm
Van Wert, S; Saunders, J. 1992. Electrofusion and electroporation of plants. Plant
Physiology 99:365 – 367. DOI = http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/99/2/365.
full.pdf+html
Yasugi, S. 1989. Isolation and culture of orchid protoplasts. In Bajaj, Y ed.
Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. 8v. Heidelberg, DE, Springer - Verlag
Berlin. 235 – 253 p.