Top Banner
5/6/10 1 Experiences in Astronomical Observing Astronomy 460, Spring 2010 Prof. Snezana Stanimirovic About live presentations - Philosophy of displaying information: Content is paramount! Format (PowerPoint, Keynote, blackboard) is just a vehicle. Don’t get format get on the way. Content/purpose should determine the format (e.g. a PPT presentation or a technical report) - Prof. Alyssa Goodman: “PPT does not kill your presentation, but bullets do!” - “PPT is like the weather. Everybody likes to complain about it, but nobody does anything about it.” Stephen Kosslyn’s book on presentations ‘Clear and to the point’ - Useful presentation tips at: www.presentationzen.com Concerns about PPT, or things to be aware of “When we understand that slide, we’ll have won the war,” General McChrystal from “We Have Met the Enemy and He Is PowerPoint”, New York Times (April 27 2010) “It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of contro l,” General McMaster said. “Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.” “Cognitive (involving perception, reasoning) style of PPT” by Edward Tufte - Billions of slides are made and used every year at all levels (from schools to government agencies and military). - Good points about PPT: enforces organization and structure; flexible image import, manipulation, labeling; easy modification, creation, archiving; great image display. - Bad points about PPT: encourages abbreviated thought and over-simplified information (many almost content-free slides); time synch for perfectionists; hierarchical single-path structure (hard to see connectivity); sales-pitch style (one- way flow of information); slides often go too fast with too much information. - PPT helps ~10% of presenters, does not affect ~10% of presenters, but ~80% of presenters may be affected negatively. - Content and purpose of presentation should determine the style and format. PPT is not the best vehicle for all presentations (public talks vs technical reports). - Often a permanent record of presentation is needed: gives a reference for the future and also allows audience to control the pace of learning. Another good way: show multiple images to encourage comparison. Assessing quality of technical reports 2006: Nearly all engineering presentations at NASA are made in PPT! Example: Jan 2003 Columbia accident and analysis of the debris impact by Boeing Corporation engineers Slide on page 10: PPT reports resulted in mixed readings of the threat Optimistic executive summary at the top not in agreement with comments below “Flight condition is significantly outside of test database” --- how can we then trust the data? Debris hitting Columbia is 640x larger than what was used for the tests! Note cryptic language making it much harder to understand. “significant” used 5x on this slide: 640x is a huge difference. The same unit for volume (cubic inches) shown in 3 different ways, confusing Bulleted style fragments thoughts and filters out key explanations and supporting information. Columbia accident investigation board said: “The Board views the endemic use of PPT briefing slides instead of technical papers as an illustration of the problematic methods of technical communications at NASA.” PPT slides should not replace or even supplement formal technical reports! For serious presentations, paper handouts and reports with full sentences, numbers, and data graphics are superior.
4

AST460 ppt - UW Madison Astronomy Departmentsstanimi/Students/AST460_ppt.pdf · 2010. 5. 6. · Boeing Corporation engineers • Slide on page 10: – PPT reports resulted in mixed

Jan 31, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 5/6/10!

    1!

    Experiences in Astronomical Observing �Astronomy 460, Spring 2010�

    Prof. Snezana Stanimirovic

    About live presentations- Philosophy of displaying information:

    Content is paramount!

    Format (PowerPoint, Keynote, blackboard) is just a vehicle.

    Don’t get format get on the way.

    Content/purpose should determine the format (e.g. a PPT presentation or a technical report)

    -  Prof. Alyssa Goodman: “PPT does not kill your presentation, but bullets do!”

    -  “PPT is like the weather. Everybody likes to complain about it, but nobody does anything about it.” Stephen Kosslyn’s book on presentations ‘Clear and to the point’

    -  Useful presentation tips at: www.presentationzen.com

    Concerns about PPT, or �things to be aware of

    “When we understand that slide, we’ll have won the war,” General McChrystal from “We Have Met the Enemy and He Is PowerPoint”, New York Times (April 27 2010)�

    “It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control,” General McMaster said. “Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.”

    “Cognitive (involving perception, reasoning) style of PPT” by Edward Tufte

    -  Billions of slides are made and used every year at all levels (from schools to government agencies and military).

    - Good points about PPT: enforces organization and structure; flexible image import, manipulation, labeling; easy modification, creation, archiving; great image display.

    -  Bad points about PPT: encourages abbreviated thought and over-simplified information (many almost content-free slides); time synch for perfectionists; hierarchical single-path structure (hard to see connectivity); sales-pitch style (one-way flow of information); slides often go too fast with too much information.

    - PPT helps ~10% of presenters, does not affect ~10% of presenters, but ~80% of presenters may be affected negatively.

    - Content and purpose of presentation should determine the style and format. PPT is not the best vehicle for all presentations (public talks vs technical reports).

    - Often a permanent record of presentation is needed: gives a reference for the future and also allows audience to control the pace of learning. Another good way: show multiple images to encourage comparison.

    Assessing quality of technical reports•  2006: Nearly all engineering presentations at NASA are made in PPT!•  Example: Jan 2003 Columbia accident and analysis of the debris impact by

    Boeing Corporation engineers•  Slide on page 10:

    –  PPT reports resulted in mixed readings of the threat–  Optimistic executive summary at the top not in agreement with comments below–  “Flight condition is significantly outside of test database” --- how can we then trust

    the data? Debris hitting Columbia is 640x larger than what was used for the tests! Note cryptic language making it much harder to understand.

    –  “significant” used 5x on this slide: 640x is a huge difference.–  The same unit for volume (cubic inches) shown in 3 different ways, confusing–  Bulleted style fragments thoughts and filters out key explanations and supporting

    information. Columbia accident investigation board said: “The Board views the endemic use of PPT briefing slides instead of technical papers as an illustration of the problematic methods of technical communications at NASA.”

    PPT slides should not replace or even supplement formal technical reports! For serious presentations, paper handouts and reports with full sentences,

    numbers, and data graphics are superior.

  • 5/6/10!

    2!

    How can we make effective presentations?

    Planning presentation:1. Who is the audience? What is the purpose of the event?

    E.g. Public talk vs scientific conference vs technical meeting.

    People generally over-estimate human mental capacity to receive information.

    2. How much time we have to speak (and questions) ?

    ~1.5-1.2 minutes per slide. Make sure there is enough time for questions.

    Practice your talk to make sure you don’t go over your allocated time.

    3. What is exactly that you want to explain? OR

    What are the 3 things you want people to remember from your talk?

    Make an outline/sketch/structure on the paper: think about what are the main ideas/topics you want to talk about, and connections between them. Make a beautiful story with all parts fitting nicely into a logical flow.

    4. CONTENT CONTENT CONTEN CONTENT CONTENT !!!!

    5. Handouts!

    “Viewgraphs leave no trace.” Edward Tufte

    6. How much referencing should I include? Give credit where credit is due!

    Guidelines on how to communicate content properly:

    1.  Keep slide design simple. Do not district audience with busy backgrounds and no-content images. Make your own templates tailored for your needs.

    2.  Limit Bullets and text: bullets are essential for outlines, but too many are distasteful and boring

    3.  Use clear and high-quality visuals: images, graphs and animations. Combine graphics and text, use visual variety to show&tell. Proper labels, make graphs easy to read. Maximize information, minimize mess. Safer to avoid making tables PPT (use IDL). Use graph layering to enhance comparison of information.

    Keep it simple! “If a picture isn’t worth a thousand words, the hell with it.” Reinhardt

    4.  Confidence: The more you are on top of your material the less nervous you will be.

    Useful info: “Presentationzen” at http://www.garrreynolds.com/Presentation

    5. Think about fonts (emphasis on simplicity and consistency):

    San-serif fonts are generally best for PowerPoint presentations.

    E.g. Gill San-serif or Arial vs Serif (Times)

    Make sure text can be read from the back of the room.

    6. Think about color choices (emphasis on simplicity and consistency):

    Okabe & Ito (2008):!http://jfly.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/color/#select!

    Do not use just color to show information. !Use color + shape (redundant coding)!

    A few examples:

  • 5/6/10!

    3!

    An example clear outline:

    What’s this “VDQI” for?–  Data exploration–  Hypothesis testing–  Making a point–  Illustrating/demonstrating an idea–  Condensing information–  >1 of the above (best answer)

    Does my display pass the “impact test”?

    An example graph:

    Stanimirovic+08!

    An example graph

    6 0.1

    2 3 4 5 6

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    10 2 3

    Tim

    e B

    etw

    een

    Inte

    ract

    ions

    in M

    yr (N

    o G

    ravi

    ty)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 2 3 4 5 Number of Clumps per pc 3

    Interaction time, w/o gravity: τ=(πNa2σ)-1

    Blue line shows times for σ =1 km s-1, and a=0.1 pc

    Urban (Yes)

    Suburban (Rarely)

    Rural (No)

    100 Kyr

    10 Myr

    1 Myr

    Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!

    An example graph

    ram pre

    ssure

    old tid

    al

    new

    tidal

      LMC

    X Putman03 ∆ GALFA

      LMC

    X Putman03 ∆ GALFA

    An example layered graph

    ram pre

    ssure

    old tid

    al

    new

    tidal

      LMC

    X Putman03

    Predicted velocity gradient along the MS

  • 5/6/10!

    4!

    Velocity gradient along the MS

    ram pre

    ssure

    old tid

    al

    new

    tidal

      LMC

    X Putman03 ∆ GALFA

     Show multiple images/objects to encourage comparison and !connection. Also, redundant coding.!

    Bad table example

    Heiles & Troland 03;!Begum+08;!SS+09!

    A good table

    example:

    1

    00pc

    Type

    of C

    ode

    Cod

    e N

    ame

    Size Active Collaborators Year

    AMR Orion 512^3 + Klein, McKee, Krumholz 2006 -2,E (1) i s

    SPH 5.E+05 Bate, Bonnell 2003 -4,P (1) i sf

    (Eul.) Grid

    ZEUS 256^3 Ostriker, Stone, Gammie 1999 -2,E (1) iMHD i 2D

    MHD Stagger 128^3 Padoan, Nordlund 1999 (2) * i

    MHD ENZO 1024^3 Padoan 2006 iMHD i ** *

    MHD 128^3 Li, Nakamura 2006 (3) sf

    MHD 128^3Vazquez-Semadeni, Ballesteros-

    Paredes2005 (4)

    SPH? Proteus512-2048

    Heitsch, Burkert 2005 n/a n/a n/a

    -2,E

    -4,P

    i

    iMHD

    (s) sink particles inserted at beginning *

    (sf) sink particles formed

    * multiple cases 2D projctd. onto 2D plane, no rad. xfr.

    ** in some cases

    Stell

    ar F

    eedb

    ack

    Extre

    rnal

    Radi

    atio

    n Fi

    eld

    Synt

    hetic

    Obs

    erva

    tions

    Summary: Simulations at Taste Test Basecamp (11/14/06) Features

    Simulation

    Inpu

    t Ene

    rgy

    Drivi

    ng M

    echa

    nism

    Self-

    Grav

    ity

    Magn

    etic

    Field

    s

    (4) random driving

    (3) stellar feedback (outflows)

    (2) both driven & decaying considered

    (1) decaying

    multiple cases

    ideal MHD

    isothermal

    Heat

    ing

    & Co

    olin

    g

    Chem

    istry

    Scale

    E(k)~k-2

    P(k)~k-4

    Star

    s For

    med

    Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!

    Radio Spectral-line Observations of Interstellar Clouds: �an example illustration

    Spectral Line Observations

    Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!