-
5/6/10!
1!
Experiences in Astronomical Observing �Astronomy 460, Spring
2010�
Prof. Snezana Stanimirovic
About live presentations- Philosophy of displaying
information:
Content is paramount!
Format (PowerPoint, Keynote, blackboard) is just a vehicle.
Don’t get format get on the way.
Content/purpose should determine the format (e.g. a PPT
presentation or a technical report)
- Prof. Alyssa Goodman: “PPT does not kill your presentation,
but bullets do!”
- “PPT is like the weather. Everybody likes to complain about
it, but nobody does anything about it.” Stephen Kosslyn’s book on
presentations ‘Clear and to the point’
- Useful presentation tips at: www.presentationzen.com
Concerns about PPT, or �things to be aware of
“When we understand that slide, we’ll have won the war,” General
McChrystal from “We Have Met the Enemy and He Is PowerPoint”, New
York Times (April 27 2010)�
“It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of
understanding and the illusion of control,” General McMaster said.
“Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.”
“Cognitive (involving perception, reasoning) style of PPT” by
Edward Tufte
- Billions of slides are made and used every year at all levels
(from schools to government agencies and military).
- Good points about PPT: enforces organization and structure;
flexible image import, manipulation, labeling; easy modification,
creation, archiving; great image display.
- Bad points about PPT: encourages abbreviated thought and
over-simplified information (many almost content-free slides); time
synch for perfectionists; hierarchical single-path structure (hard
to see connectivity); sales-pitch style (one-way flow of
information); slides often go too fast with too much
information.
- PPT helps ~10% of presenters, does not affect ~10% of
presenters, but ~80% of presenters may be affected negatively.
- Content and purpose of presentation should determine the style
and format. PPT is not the best vehicle for all presentations
(public talks vs technical reports).
- Often a permanent record of presentation is needed: gives a
reference for the future and also allows audience to control the
pace of learning. Another good way: show multiple images to
encourage comparison.
Assessing quality of technical reports• 2006: Nearly all
engineering presentations at NASA are made in PPT!• Example: Jan
2003 Columbia accident and analysis of the debris impact by
Boeing Corporation engineers• Slide on page 10:
– PPT reports resulted in mixed readings of the threat–
Optimistic executive summary at the top not in agreement with
comments below– “Flight condition is significantly outside of test
database” --- how can we then trust
the data? Debris hitting Columbia is 640x larger than what was
used for the tests! Note cryptic language making it much harder to
understand.
– “significant” used 5x on this slide: 640x is a huge
difference.– The same unit for volume (cubic inches) shown in 3
different ways, confusing– Bulleted style fragments thoughts and
filters out key explanations and supporting
information. Columbia accident investigation board said: “The
Board views the endemic use of PPT briefing slides instead of
technical papers as an illustration of the problematic methods of
technical communications at NASA.”
PPT slides should not replace or even supplement formal
technical reports! For serious presentations, paper handouts and
reports with full sentences,
numbers, and data graphics are superior.
-
5/6/10!
2!
How can we make effective presentations?
Planning presentation:1. Who is the audience? What is the
purpose of the event?
E.g. Public talk vs scientific conference vs technical
meeting.
People generally over-estimate human mental capacity to receive
information.
2. How much time we have to speak (and questions) ?
~1.5-1.2 minutes per slide. Make sure there is enough time for
questions.
Practice your talk to make sure you don’t go over your allocated
time.
3. What is exactly that you want to explain? OR
What are the 3 things you want people to remember from your
talk?
Make an outline/sketch/structure on the paper: think about what
are the main ideas/topics you want to talk about, and connections
between them. Make a beautiful story with all parts fitting nicely
into a logical flow.
4. CONTENT CONTENT CONTEN CONTENT CONTENT !!!!
5. Handouts!
“Viewgraphs leave no trace.” Edward Tufte
6. How much referencing should I include? Give credit where
credit is due!
Guidelines on how to communicate content properly:
1. Keep slide design simple. Do not district audience with busy
backgrounds and no-content images. Make your own templates tailored
for your needs.
2. Limit Bullets and text: bullets are essential for outlines,
but too many are distasteful and boring
3. Use clear and high-quality visuals: images, graphs and
animations. Combine graphics and text, use visual variety to
show&tell. Proper labels, make graphs easy to read. Maximize
information, minimize mess. Safer to avoid making tables PPT (use
IDL). Use graph layering to enhance comparison of information.
Keep it simple! “If a picture isn’t worth a thousand words, the
hell with it.” Reinhardt
4. Confidence: The more you are on top of your material the
less nervous you will be.
Useful info: “Presentationzen” at
http://www.garrreynolds.com/Presentation
5. Think about fonts (emphasis on simplicity and
consistency):
San-serif fonts are generally best for PowerPoint
presentations.
E.g. Gill San-serif or Arial vs Serif (Times)
Make sure text can be read from the back of the room.
6. Think about color choices (emphasis on simplicity and
consistency):
Okabe & Ito
(2008):!http://jfly.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/color/#select!
Do not use just color to show information. !Use color + shape
(redundant coding)!
A few examples:
-
5/6/10!
3!
An example clear outline:
What’s this “VDQI” for?– Data exploration– Hypothesis
testing– Making a point– Illustrating/demonstrating an idea–
Condensing information– >1 of the above (best answer)
Does my display pass the “impact test”?
An example graph:
Stanimirovic+08!
An example graph
6 0.1
2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
10 2 3
Tim
e B
etw
een
Inte
ract
ions
in M
yr (N
o G
ravi
ty)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 2 3 4 5 Number of
Clumps per pc 3
Interaction time, w/o gravity: τ=(πNa2σ)-1
Blue line shows times for σ =1 km s-1, and a=0.1 pc
Urban (Yes)
Suburban (Rarely)
Rural (No)
100 Kyr
10 Myr
1 Myr
Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!
An example graph
ram pre
ssure
old tid
al
new
tidal
LMC
X Putman03 ∆ GALFA
LMC
X Putman03 ∆ GALFA
An example layered graph
ram pre
ssure
old tid
al
new
tidal
LMC
X Putman03
Predicted velocity gradient along the MS
-
5/6/10!
4!
Velocity gradient along the MS
ram pre
ssure
old tid
al
new
tidal
LMC
X Putman03 ∆ GALFA
Show multiple images/objects to encourage comparison and
!connection. Also, redundant coding.!
Bad table example
Heiles & Troland 03;!Begum+08;!SS+09!
A good table
example:
1
00pc
Type
of C
ode
Cod
e N
ame
Size Active Collaborators Year
AMR Orion 512^3 + Klein, McKee, Krumholz 2006 -2,E (1) i s
SPH 5.E+05 Bate, Bonnell 2003 -4,P (1) i sf
(Eul.) Grid
ZEUS 256^3 Ostriker, Stone, Gammie 1999 -2,E (1) iMHD i 2D
MHD Stagger 128^3 Padoan, Nordlund 1999 (2) * i
MHD ENZO 1024^3 Padoan 2006 iMHD i ** *
MHD 128^3 Li, Nakamura 2006 (3) sf
MHD 128^3Vazquez-Semadeni, Ballesteros-
Paredes2005 (4)
SPH? Proteus512-2048
Heitsch, Burkert 2005 n/a n/a n/a
-2,E
-4,P
i
iMHD
(s) sink particles inserted at beginning *
(sf) sink particles formed
* multiple cases 2D projctd. onto 2D plane, no rad. xfr.
** in some cases
Stell
ar F
eedb
ack
Extre
rnal
Radi
atio
n Fi
eld
Synt
hetic
Obs
erva
tions
Summary: Simulations at Taste Test Basecamp (11/14/06)
Features
Simulation
Inpu
t Ene
rgy
Drivi
ng M
echa
nism
Self-
Grav
ity
Magn
etic
Field
s
(4) random driving
(3) stellar feedback (outflows)
(2) both driven & decaying considered
(1) decaying
multiple cases
ideal MHD
isothermal
Heat
ing
& Co
olin
g
Chem
istry
Scale
E(k)~k-2
P(k)~k-4
Star
s For
med
Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!
Radio Spectral-line Observations of Interstellar Clouds: �an
example illustration
Spectral Line Observations
Courtesy:!Alyssa !Goodman!