Top Banner
Personal Pedagogical Framework Natasha Urselmann
12

Assignment 2, Part A

Apr 16, 2017

Download

Education

nurse93
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Assignment 2, Part A

Personal Pedagogical Framework

Natasha Urselmann

Page 2: Assignment 2, Part A

“the teacher is not in the school to impose certain ideas or to form certain habits in the child” – John Dewey

Page 3: Assignment 2, Part A
Page 4: Assignment 2, Part A

How I conduct effective learning experiences•Brainstorming

•Total class

•Open discussion

•Cooperative learning

•Role playing

•Guided inquiry

•Problem solving

•Concept mapping

Interactive Instruction

Constructivism

Cognitivism

Indirect Instruction

Constructivism

Cognitivism

Page 5: Assignment 2, Part A

Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

Representation, Action & Expression and Engagement

CAST (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.

Page 6: Assignment 2, Part A

Social and Emotional Wellbeing•Underpins the other four “petals” of my framework

•Realise and understand fullest potential and be able to fully function as part of society

•If not addressed, can unfold into later problems in learning engagement and social interactions with peers

•Strongly linked to cognitive growth

•Promoting expectations and beliefs that optimise motivation connects to UDL

Page 7: Assignment 2, Part A

Formative Assessment•Need to generate understanding of student learning

•Allows opportunities to adjust future learning

•Allows opportunities for feedback

•Lack of formative assessment affects self-efficacy beliefs

•Encouraging formative feedback and self-assessment is an important aspect of UDL

Page 8: Assignment 2, Part A

Authentic + Discovery Learning Experiences•Constructivist learning environment

•John Dewey,, Jean Piaget, and Lev Vygotsky

•Learning is connected to real-world and is relevant to learners

•Hands-on and problem-solving activities rather than knowledge transfer

•Sustained investigation

•Making learning outcomes authentic, communicating to real audiences, and reflecting a purpose links to UDL

Page 9: Assignment 2, Part A

Differentiation•Flexibility in

• Learning content• Resources• Instruction• Student output • Assessment

•Learners have a variety of needs and styles

•Front-load diversity

•Enables maximisation of students capabilities

•Providing alternatives in requirements , as well as physical responses and interactions connects concept to UDL

Page 10: Assignment 2, Part A

Will not always be able to employ my preferences for cognitivism and contructivism

Provide safe, supportive environment to maximise cognitive abilities

Page 11: Assignment 2, Part A

Make educated decisions on future learning

Increase independence and engagement

Cater for all individuals

Page 12: Assignment 2, Part A

References Anderson, K. (2007). Differentiating Instruction to Include All Students. Preventing School Failure. 51(3). p. 49-54. Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth. (2008). Technical Report: The Wellbeing of Young Australians.

Retrieved from http://www.aracy.org.au/publications-resources/command/download_file/id/173/filename/Technical_Report_-_The_wellbeing_of_young_Australians.pdf

Bryer, F. & Signorini, J. (2011). Primary pre-service teachers’ understanding of students’ internalising problems of mental health and wellbeing. Issues in Educational Research, 21(3). 233-258. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/43346/74639_1.pdf?sequence=1

CAST (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author. Castronova, J. (2002). "Discovery Learning for the 21st Century: What is it and How Does it Compare to Traditional Learning

in Effectiveness in the 21st Century?" Action Research Exchange 1 (1). Coffey, H. (n.d.). Discovery learning. Retrieved from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/5352 Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Simon and Schuster Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. Language Learning Journal. 35(1). pp. 81-

93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19571730701315832 Hughes, S., & McIntyre, J. (2014). Module 2 – Teaching Roles and Responsibilities. Retrieved from USQ:

http://usqstudydesk.usq.edu.au/m2/mod/resource/view.php?id=274512 Johnson, T.W., & Reed R.F. (2008). John Dewey. In Philosophical Documents in Education (3rd ed, pp. 98-124). Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview. Retrieved from

http://alicechristie.org/classes/530/EduCause.pdf Piaget, J. (1954). To Understand is to Invent. New York: Grossman. Queensland Department of Education, Training and Employment. (2014). Learning and Wellbeing Framework. Retrieved

from http://deta.qld.gov.au/initiatives/learningandwellbeing/resources/learning-and-wellbeing-framework.pdf Steinkruger, C. (2007). Do Students Progress if They Self-Assess? A Study in Small-Group Work. Retrieved from

http://scimath.unl.edu/MIM/files/research/SteinkrugerC.pdf Tomlinson, C. & Allan, S. (2000). Leadership for Differentiating Schools and Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for

Supervision & Curriculum Development. Wilson, B. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments. Englewod Clifs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.