This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
METHODOLOGY-Identification of the physical system and components of the manipulator.And Jacobians for the 3 Dof parallel manipulator. Suitable microcontrollerand actuation.
RESEARCH
The Equipments/instruments required for the experiment include:spanners, screw drivers, gauge, lathe machine, soldering iron, weighingbalance, measurin ta e, eneral machinin tools, weldin machine
Data to be collected: material properties, packaging information, datasheet of motors, weight of links, speed /rating of motors, acceleration,
Velocity of the manipulator, orientation .
Experiments:
Test to measure speed of the manipulatorTest to determine orientation of the manipulator
EXPERIMENTAND DATACOLLECTION
Modelingand
NumericalSolution
CAD DESIGN: Solidworks is use to model the structure
KINEMATICS ANALYSIS: SolidWorks motion Simulation is use toanalyze the kinematics of the cad model.
Robotics Simulation: Simulation using Robot studio/ any other
AnalyticalSolutions
Fabrication
Mathematical modeling of the 3 DOFParallel manipulator
4. Control system design: this involves the design of the controller to be use, such as PD, PI
and PID. The design of the circuit for the entire system. The programming of the
microcontroller. Though this project priority is the kinematics and static analysis of the
parallel manipulator. This control design is necessary for demonstration of the
capabilities and working principle of the system.
Generally in this design phase, the workspace must be know, the torque of various links and
platform. The method of actuation and the type of end effectors that will be utilize. The
material properties such as yield strength will be considered.
3.6. Data Analysis and InterpretationThe data use or collected at various stage will be analyze .The experimental data will be
compare to the simulation as well as the analytical results obtain. The workspace calculationand the simulated result will be compared. The torque required will be calculated. Graphs
will be plotted to illustrate or compare data. Result obtain will also be listed in table manner
for adequate understanding.
4.0. EXPECTED RESULT [5 marks]
This project is a fabrication project as such; the mechanical structure of the robot will be
built. It is expected that a parallel manipulator is fabricated. Parallel manipulator has two or
more links that connect a moving platform to a single base. (Ayssam Elkady, 2008). The
design of the parallel manipulator should fulfill this requirement links joining base and
moving platform).
Payload Capacity: The manipulator should be able to carry a reasonably load to its
structure. More on this will be determine after the first meeting with my supervisor
when the project commences.
The robot achieved the desirable trajectory with a position error less than 20 × 10 − 3
m after 5 seconds. This is a test for the positioning accuracy of the robot as well as
the programming and the acceleration. Since this robot will be use for the packaging
industry, it is necessary that this positional accuracy is achieved.
Cad Model: there should be proof of the cad model of the system. 2D draft as well as
3D models of each individual components and there assembly. The Cad models will
be printed and use for both the poster presentation as well as the final report.
5.0. Project Cost [5 marks]
Economists, engineering managers, project managers, and indeed any person involved in
decision making must be able to analyze the financial outcome of his or her decision. The
decision is based on analyzing and evaluating the activities involved in producing the outcome of
the project. These activities have either a cost or a benefit. Financial analysis gives us the tools to
perform this evaluation. Often the decision to make is to proceed or not to proceed with a
project. In cases involving investment, we want to know if the project is economically viable in
order to proceed. In effect, we compare the net benefit of proceeding with the project against the
consequences (good or bad) of not proceeding (the null alternative). Sometimes we are
confronted with two or more courses of action (alternatives); in this situation, we want to know
which alternative produces the greatest net benefit. To be able to make the go/no go decision or
to compare different projects, systems, or courses of action, we have to find a common measureto reflect all the costs and benefits and their time of occurrence. Financial analysis methods will
give us this capability (Abol Ardalan, 2000).
The cost estimate below is an overview of the cost of this project and is presented in table 2
The estimate above does not include some of the labor cost, such as the machining, the handling,
the assembly etc. Those operations will be carried out by the student (Nangi Ebughni.). However
I have included a miscellaneous of Rm 500. This is to cover any unforeseen rise of materialprices. Also the project will commence next year, meaning there might be increase in tax or cost
of labor or fixed cost like rent and these might leads to rise in prices, to avoid the effects of those
increases, I have included the miscellaneous. The total cost for this project is worth Rm 3591