Watts, Griffis and McOuat 42A08NW8894 2.10846 MCCANN 010 ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE HYDE CLAIMS OF McCANN TOWNSHIP LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION FOR LENCOURT LIMITED 2. 1 0346 RECEIVED FEB l 9 1988 MINING LANDS SECTION Toronto, Ontario February 17, 1988 Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited Consulting Geologists and Engineers
48
Embed
ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE€¦ · watts, griffis and mcouat 42a08nw8894 2.10846 mccann 010 assessment report on the hyde claims of mccann township larder lake mining division for lencourt
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
42A08NW8894 2.10846 MCCANN 010
ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE
HYDE CLAIMS OF McCANN TOWNSHIP
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
FOR LENCOURT LIMITED
2. 1 0346
RECEIVED
FEB l 9 1988
MINING LANDS SECTION
Toronto, Ontario February 17, 1988
Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited Consulting Geologists and Engineers
Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited of Toronto was retained to oversee work done by Lencourt Limited on the Hyde claims of the McCann Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario.
2._____PROPERTY - LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
2A____LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is located in the southeastern portion of McCann Township, Larder Lake
Mining Division, Ontario at latitude 48 022'30"N and longitude 80 0 24'40"W or
approximately 65 kilometres east of Timmins and 10 kilometres southwest of Ramore
and is readily accessible by logging roads (sre Figure 1).
2.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property consists of 27 contiguous, unpatented mining claims numbered as follows:
L 800806
L 800807
L 800808
L 800810
L 800811
L 80081 2
L 821929
L 821930
L 821931
L 821932
L 821936
L 821937
L 979771
L 979772
L 979773
L 979774
L 979775
L 979776
L 982489
L 982490
L 982491
L 982492
L 982493
L 982494
L 982495
L 982496
L 982497
3._____GEOLOGY
3.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The area is underlain by intermediate and mafic metavolcanics, sediments of
Gowganda Formation (Coleman Members) and diabase dykes.
- l-
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
PROPERTY LOCATION
Scale I"s32 miles
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
3.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The property is primarily underlain by mafic volcanics with scattered amphibolite and
syenite dykes. Two large quartz vein systems were uncovered on the central part of
the property (see Figure 2). Vein No. l trends approximately 35 0 NE while vein No. 2
runs about 42 0 NE. The veins are generally barren of mineralization with minor
sulphides in some of the wall rock.
4. LINE CUTTING
Three separate crews completed the line cutting on the Hyde claims amounting to
36. 1 79 kilometres. Line cutting took place between October 25 and November 21,
1987 with the majority of the cutting (25.37 kilometres) being completed by Laforest-
Hlava Exploration Services Ltd. (Appendix 3). Lines were established at b 00 foot
intervals with pickets every 100 feet.
5. _____ SAMPLING
M ____ SOIL SAMPLING
A total of 218 soil samples were taken between October 18 and 25, 1987. Sampling
was done at 25 foot spacings and at a depth of approximately l foot. The area of
primary sampling was between lines 1200 W and 800 E and up to 600 feet north and
south of the baseline. Results were disappointing with little consistency between
values (Appendix I).
5.2 ROCK SAMPLING
A total of 68 rock samples were taken between September 21 and November 3, 1987.
The bulk of the samples were from the 2 main quartz veins (see Figure 2). All samples
were tested for Au with 4 samples being run for multi-element analysis. Again results
were poor with only one isolated sample returning 0.24 oz gold/ton (Appendix H).
-3-
8(
7
•0-
X)W 41
\
i
SYENITE, MAFIC \ 4iw VOLCANICS AND \ . AMPHIBOLITE ':
\
.'S"' '
,;''^ \ /"
//'^ SHACK D
• 1';
-s-
4
)OW 1
's.
\\\
i* 0"V*x.'/•A **^
' V ^
""" ,-'w' "^ lX^QUVE.N x^'4;v.,.-y]
/' 1^ ^
•••"' ^ V-^ /f'
#^/'' *" SYENITE
QUARTZ STRINGER 30' t SYENITE/AMPHIBOLE
3 4(
. SYENITE AND .' AMPHIBOLITE
*
i *
i: l...
://^KmozAu/t
•. AMPHIBOLITE AND ^ SYENITE DYKES
.••"
600N
400N
•200N
B i
•200S
400S
S MOSTLY SYENITE
•600 S800E
0 100 200 300 400
JOE F EET
Figure 2. Generalized Geologic Map
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
6._____STRIPPING
A program of mechanical stripping was carried out between October l and 20, 1987.
From October l to 10, a bulldozer (D7) was used for a total of 54 hours. Between
October 10 and 20, the bulldozer was replaced by a backhoe to get at trouble areas,
amounting to 65 hours of work. After this, 21.5 man days were spent spraying down
and clearing the outcrop of all debris. The stripping revealed 2 large quartz veins,
extending several hundred feet averaging 2 feet in thickness but up to 6 feet in a few
locations.
7._____MAPPING
Detailed mapping was carried out on the 2 main veins at a scale of l" to 12'.
Approximately 8 man days were spent setting up a grid and mapping the vein systems.
Two maps were produced as a result.
A generalized map, at a scale of l" to 200', shows vein locations and bulldozer trails
relative to grid (Figure 2).
8._____GEOPHYSICS
The geophysical work on the Hyde claims was carried out by Laforest-Hlava
Exploration Services Ltd. of Timmins (Appendix III). Both ground magnetometer and
VLF-EM 16 electromagnetic surveys were conducted on the grid.
The magnetometer survey was completed over 38.52 kilometres and over
1,200 readings were taken. Results indicate the probable presence of 3 varieties of
rock units underlying the grid (Appendix III).
The electromagnetic survey totalled almost 1,200 readings over 35.6 kilometres.
Thirty-two individual anomalies were interpreted to warrant further evaluation
(Appendix III).
-5-
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
9. CONCLUSIONS
Overall results were not encouraging. In order to fully evaluate the potential of the
property, further geological mapping and sampling will be necessary. At present
however further work is not anticipated.
-6-
RECEIVED
FEB l 9
MINING LANDS
Appendices I and II
Sampling Results to AccompanyLencourt's Assessment
VLF EM SurveyFraser Filter NAA StationVLF EM Survey In-Phase/Quadrature NAA Station
In back pocket-i
In back pocket
In back pocket
INTRODUCTION
The following report describes the results of a ground magnetometer survey and VLF EM survey for Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited on a claim group located in McCann Township, Larder Lake Mining Division. The field work was completed on December 13, 1987. The report was completed on December 17, 1987.
PROPERTY LOCATION AND ACCESS (FIGURE 1)
The property is located in the southeastern portion of McCann Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario at Latitude 48 0 22' 30" and Longitude 80 0 24' 40" or approxi mately 65 km (40.39 miles) east of Timmins.
The property is accessible by a bush road from Ramore, approximately 10 kilometers (6.21 miles) southwest.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (FIGURE 2)
The property consists of 27 contiguous, unpatented mining claims numbered as follows:
L LLLLL
800806 800807800808800818008180081
012
L LLLLL
82 8282828282
1 11111
929 930931932936937
L L
-- L
LLL
979771 979772979773979774979775979776
LLLLLL
982489 L 982495 982490 L 982496982491 L 982497982492982493982494
SO0
490
48*
500
49*
48*
PROPERTY LOCATION
Scale I"s32 miles FIGURE l
621932 l L822236
————— ————— |
OSOri- L 600608
L Leoo8io
l AQlftJA i -OOftfll
\sst—— -4--
L *824*6 /' t 6624*7t\
MCCANN TOWNSHIP PORTION OF CLAIM MAP NO. G3673
Scale 1:20000 FIGURE 2
REGIONAL GEOLOGY (FIGURE 3)
The regional geology shown on Figure 3 is a portion of the Ontario Department of Natural Resources Map No. 2205. The area is underlain by intermediate and mafic metavolcanics, sediments of Gowganda Formation (Coleman Member) and diabase dikes.
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The details regarding the property geology were not available to the author at the time of writing of this report. The geophysical crew noted the presence of 71 out crops within the property.
LINE CUTTING
The grid was chained utilizing the Imperial System. The grid lines were established in a true north-south direc tion at 400 feet (121.92 m) intervals with pickets at 100 ft. (30.48 m) intervals. The main base line and two tie lines (TL 24 * 00 N and TL 20 * 00 S) were established on the property.
GROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
The ground magnetometer survey was completed utilizing a proton magnetometer capable of reading total field values to an accuracy of ±1 gamma. The main base station was established at BL O * 00 with the value of 59787 gammas. Secondary base stations were established at 100' (30.48 m) intervals along the base line and along the tie line to provide data for diurnal corrections. Diurnal variation was corrected by tieing in to the base stations at the time intervals less than 60 minutes. Maximum misclosure was 22 gammas. A total of 1,266 readings were taken.
IF Ironformttionandferruglnouschert (occursasamemberofstratlgraphic units 1,!. 4, ana S).
Sulphide mineralization.
SYMBOLS ^
Geological boundary.
Synclinal axis.
Anticlinal axis.
Faun.
Lineament.
Altitude in feet above mean sea level.
Railway with station or flagstop.
VLF-EM 16 ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
The electromagnetic survey was carried out utilizing a Geonics EM-16, VLF-EM receiver. The unit measures the vertical In-phase component (tangent of the tilt angle of the polarization ellipsoid) and vertical Out-of-phase component (the short axis of the polarization ellipsoid compared to the long axis) of the secondary field generated in the vicinity of conductors.
The transmitter station used for the survey was NAA Cutler Maine with the frequency of 24.0 kHz. The azimuth to the station (NAA) is 140 0 . All the readings were taken with the operator facing north.
A total of 1,170 readings were taken within the property.
SURVEY RESULTS - MAGNETOMETER
The results of the ground magnetometer survey are presented on Map 1 in a back pocket. The maximum magnetic relief within the property is 12,263 gammas in the north western portion of the property.
The prominent magnetic linear magnetic high between L 16 W 8 * 0 0 N and Line 8 E 5 t 00 S is probably due to the presence of ultramafic sill. The northwestern portion of the property is underlain by volcanics and the remainder of the property is probably underlain by felsic intrusive and/or sediments.
SURVEY RESULTS - VLF EM
The survey results are presented on maps in back pocket as follows:
Map 2 - Fraser Filter NAA station
Map 3 - Profiles - In-Phase and Quadrature NAA station
A total of 32 individual anomalies were interpreted and are labeled numerically from 1 to 32 on Map 2 in a back pocket. The following table is a summary and brief descrip tion of all anomalies detected by the present survey.
ANOMALY NO
123456789101112131415161718
STRIKE LENGTH
400'
1400'1000'800'800'
2500'2400'2400'900'
1300'800'800'400'
1500'1700'400'
2200'1000'
MAXIMUM VALUE FRASER FILTER
MAGNETIC CORRELATION.* COMMENTS
481355292476925352164119144936122743
- 1214+ 1 377
--
F 209---
- 1492'
--
* 188F 4922
--
F 2700* 2714
* Flanking
ANOMALY NO
1920
212223242526272829303132
CONCLUSI
STRIKE LENGTH
1300'1200'
1300'800'
1400'1000'1300'800'800'400'
2200'1200'1800'400'
MAXIMUM VALUE FRASER FILTER
9275
161373211558133122296222
ONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MAGNETIC CORRELATION
8
COMMENTS
faulted extension of #8?
480
5556
441
A total of 32 VLF-EM 16 conductors were located during the present survey.
Anomalies 2, 13, 18, 30 and 32 display direct magnetic correlation and probably are at least partly due to the pre sence of pyrrhotite.
Anomalies 1, 9 and 24 display negative magnetic cor relation which could indicate the presence of alteration.
All of the conductors detected by the present survey deserve further evaluation.
Prior to evaluating the anomalies as potential drill targets, Watts, Griffis McOuat should complete detailed
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont'd)
geological mapping and geophysical surveys. Grid lines at- 100' spacing should be established over the target areas and magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys should be conducted at 25' intervals.
Once this data is available, a meaningful decision can be made regarding the anomalies that may require further evaluation by trenching or drilling.
Respectfully submitted
Milan Hlava, B.Se., F.G.A.S.
CERTIFICATE
I, Milan Hlava of the City of Timmins, Province of Ontario, Canada and Town of Surrey, Province of British Columbia, do state:
1. That I am a practising consulting geologist with offices at 24 Pine Street South, P. 0. Box 1163, Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9 and 14746 90A Avenue, Surrey, B. C. V3R 1B2.
2. That I am a graduate of Komensky University,Bratislava, Czechoslovakia (1968) with a degree of Bachelor of Science in Exploration Geology.
3. That I have practised my profession as a Geologistcontinuously since 1968 and as a Consulting Geologist continuously since 1984.
4. That I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada since 1982.
5. That I have no interest directly, indirectly nor anticipated in Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited or the properties in this report.
6. That I am familiar with the material contained in this report, having examined all the material my self.
7. That the conclusions reached in this report are my own.
Respectfully submitted
(A/l^ei^ *^s*4afr42 Milan Hlava, B.Se..F.G.A.S.
COURT LTD.CLAIMS, fi c C MM Tup.
s ,/'---.'X^
•'*.
J&--
3^, 4^ W.,^".-.V ^
tno
Co.oe*^ *\
*iw
" x^ j lll'l*^
v^ -w *tt—
H..U.VK;
o o
-:
ea
2l r
1 2*
2 *?
O
*iv*
C
73
til^
0 tn
^. 3
w
OEv
r\
v *,
'\
* l
* \.'
U)
gfU
I I0-J
oo c*.
s-
ex O
-' S
o: o
Ministry of•- Northern Development
and
Type of Survey(s)
Report of Work
(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
42A08NW8894 3.10846 MCCANN
Mining Act
900
Cto'm Holderisl
•Address
406 - Q fri(Survey Company
Township or Area
KcProspector's Licence No.
T 5015
E: "TSTro^ M5C le 6
** vices
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
Date of Survey (from fii to)
f n n\ r t* eilay l Mo. l Yr. j Day j Mo. j Yr.
Total Mile* of line Cut
23. *\
iu Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right{Special Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
gnetometer
Days per Claim
40
For each additional survey: uvng the sany^r/d: j
Enter 20 days (for each) '
i——
- Radiometric l
Other
20
MIMING LANDS SEETOSETION' Geochenncdi
Note: Special provisions : Electromagnetic
credits do not apply to Airborne Survevs Magnetometer
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
(excludes power stripping)
, pe ot Work 77-Po"oimeo on Ciaim(s)
LBOOfioS) cto*- BIO, *m 775* ^ 97?77b
culation of Expenditure Oayt Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
S 3,lb5.25
Tola) Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's
choice. Enter ri umber of day* credits per claim selected
*n co'umns at right.
Date
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Expend. Days Cr.
571 771.-lie
17*! 773
Total numOer of mining claims covered by this reoort of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O.lDate Recorded Recorded
Mining Recorder
l heiebv certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report ofWorVa'rTneyeffKereto.Tiaving performed the work
or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
tilt ?r^ one?
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M.fl.O.-MINING RIGHTS ONLY
S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
M.* S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
Description Order No. Oat*
LEGEND
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS
SURVEYED LINESTOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC
BOWMAN TOWNSHIPLOTS. MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS. ETC
UNSURVEYEO l INBS
PARCEL BOUNDARYMtMNG CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY
UTIl'T" LINES
NON PERENNIAL STREAM
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN
RESERVATIONS
ORIGINAL SHORELINE
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES
TRAVERSE MONUMENTAndrew
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PATENT. SURFACE S MINING RIGHTS
" . SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
. MINING RIGHTSONLY
LEASE. SURFACE St M INING RIGHTS
" .SURFACE RIGHTSONL,Y.........-.--.—.....—— B- .MINING RIGHTS ONLY--.. ——-—————- U
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ....,.....,..,————-*- T
ORDER IN COUNCIL ........,..,........ J —...........__ OC
RESERVATION
CANCELLED
SAND fi. GRAVEL
De CovrceNOTE: M INING RIGHTS IN P ARCELS P ATENTED PRIOR TO WAV 6.
1913. VESTED 'M O RIGINAL PATENTEE BY TM6 PUBLIC LANDS ACT RSO 1970, CHAP 3BO, SEC. S3. SUBSEC 1.
10 20 M 10 SO 60 79
500 O WOO 2000 3000 4000 SOOO'~ ~ " ' i
SCALE 1:20 000
Wildgoose \\
iiTE OF ISSUE
^:EP is 1987— — TV" ~~ ~ ~ I L-RDERLAKE
N:v:2 RECORDER'S OFFICE-h----
TOWNSHiPL 982 W . L 982498 MCCANN
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION
LARDER LAKELAND T ITLES/ R EGISTRY DIVISION
COCHRANE
Me. vtile-
To d h anter L.
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
MHstry ofNaturalResourcesTOWNSHIPTOLSTOI
100
SCALE : l inch: 200 Feet
TOPOGRAPHIC
- - - - Troll portoger
~ — — Bush rood
- Good driving rood, Highway
————— Rail road
Claim post located
Claim post assumed location
* f W itness post
Creek, River
Lake shore
Swamp, Bog ——. —— —Property boundry line
a
a
a
MAGNETIC SURVEY
A dd 56,000 Gammas to all readings for total field values
O Contours
Depression Contour
Contour intervals: | 000
Gammas
Base Station location: Q400 , L
2 . 1 0846
WATTS-GRIFFIS ft McOUATLAFOREST-HLAVA EXPLORATION
MCCANN TWP PROPERTYInstrument:
Geometrics G-816 Proton MagnetometerDrafting by: Guy Thibault Exploration ServicesDrawn by: G. Thibault Dote: 15-12-87
Date of Survey November 1967
en OO)
Oen
oCO
rrOO
c
42A88NW8694 2., e846 MCCANN
210
SCALE : l inch: 200 Feet
TOPOGRAPHIC
Trail portage
Bush rood
Good driving road, Highway
Rail road
Claim post located
Claim post assumed location
Witness post
Creek, River
Lake shore
Swamp, Bog - Property boundry line
V.L.F.- E.M. SURVEY•JO \
HO X .
\
'i:-Kt X
20 TRUE CWUb.5 OVER
2.10846
WATTS-GRIFFIS ci McOUATLAFOREST-HLAVA EXPLORATION
MCCANN TWP PROPERTYinstrument:
Geonics EM-16
Drafting by: Guy Thibault Exploration ServicesDrawn by: M. Caron Date: 15-12-87
Date of Survey November 1987
CON cc
r oH
W
- -x ^ —————- -!X--—— W- - ——
CD
OD
o K 0 ^\L^ * * * 4 o * ^-—*-I^r* -- ~ * ^/v---*~-H
35 en (7i en o CD ^••cn en ^ t* 4* *ur tn * * ro lv\"^r -"^ Vxi~-- )i"'X^^ 0 0 w
^ - - K ' - - -
ro
,X- - - — h
en en
X- -
O CO Q y CO
-*- ̂-K V——— "X **
•* "" ^ v* ^".^^.^- x* x---v---x-_^ x- __ x _^ —x x . ___ ̂ ~ * y
* * ^.^ — . ro ~ ro *
-' *s^s
ra
ro ro ra 5
K)—-— K
V ^---^ "K.^^
i i * CO ro
.X'
en
S t^~
en F3
.—— - X
x. -~ -.ro en ro
*o CO CD •/lra en en to en en
ro•x"
Ul en Oi N
(DOD
ken X
(D
*'" X~ X-,/i i i i ^cir
en O t" N S
^7
O OD\ > — ̂5 5\ ^ A
x "* \ ,- "x '^ y^ •*""" en m "^^^^^ ro* *~ — -
\ *-*^ ^*"•CO* ro ro •^ g j- m \ en en ra
CD O O CD
i ' 'o w -J*
V, 1 1 1
i o j.-*-" ^"^cn CD Q ™ ps j^ TJ - -^* —— " x ^^ T)'"^"^ en ^j OD g fg \^ o t*b^ O)^— S CD ~
y --- ^"-^ i .x-"' 11
en O O
COO C)
r~ r
roCC/")
O
CO
•42A08NW8894 a . 18846 MCCANN
-^4OO
SCALE : l inch: 200 Feet
BLACK RIVIR MATHESON (
TOPOGRAPHIC
- ~ - - - Troll portage
~~~— Bush rood
— Good driving road, Highway
—,____ Rail road
o Claim post located
a Claim post assumed location
a * f W itness post
^ ^ ^ Creek, River
Lake shore
Swamp, Bog Property boundry line
V.L.F.- E.M. SURVEY
FRASER FILTER
2. 1 0846
WATTS-GRIFFIS fc McOUATLAFOREST-HLAVA EXPLORATION
MCCANN TWP PROPERTYInstrument:
E M - 16 GEONICSby: Guy Thibault Exploration Services
Of awn b y Q Thibault D ote: 20-12-87
Date of Survey November 1982
Contour everyto *
CON
r* o
oH
IN)
O H
o* o01
-p o O '
00
-Hf"l
o c/)
o00
42AC8NW8894 2.18846 MCCANN 230
UJUJ
oM
-Jl-J
03 i
-rO
i00l
UJ(Oi
UJ
O
UJUJ (Dl-J
UCVJ 10l
UJIP10 l
o
962489821931
821932822237
800812800806
9776
00810.-8
00807
800808'
T:..- 24 N
20 N
- 10 N
BL+ 0
0
10 S
TL-
20
S
30
S
OoO
CO
o(N(O
Oro
CD
ZC -'l
3 QZ -l
-l
3 OZ -l
3 9! -
3 Zl -l
3 e
AA 8-1
M
V\ 9!
o/;
S '""i"}^
o
\. N\V
—,^ x - -
in
w
-5---w
J-N
"g"O
"\ ™- -*.
O
CM
-•x~-00
o-^r /ro ^
mj —
SP"
^-^-rV H
^ N
-^- 'V ''
* u 1 t
9^sf.toN
V)
xWX
•v "•5--*^^-
Ni
:.^w
O O*x~*-x
ro
- *K-
* "^
N
--V- ^*f*~ * "™ —— "
m \w o ,
—————— .^^ ——————
-v- \ if) in 1
— - — * * ^~ — 'i
\
——— ———— -^j-r.-
o , -^ ; — ** ^ —————————
10^^^-^* r*)~~— . ̂,. io
- - — V -— — — X -i.
.^ i *?r . .
in r^ co in J——— - -^^^^^ - . — —
' — — ~- .^^^
•^^
(fi
s"
--^-s -s —— 1 "* ———————— -K^-"
in (D— " "~^**s..
^- -^' — — -~-^" "-*
P -K — -
1
k
i O - — X™. v — x^ — ̂L
N (fi. _ K.-1^
-- ̂
^A
—M———— CJ /^ l,* ' "*- J ^' — jr1^1 i^*-^. ' , ̂ - x - - - -^^r - X ^ ̂