Top Banner
Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, September 16, 2004 University of Wisconsin, Madison
16

Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors

Long-Poe Ku

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Aries Project Meeting, September 16, 2004

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Page 2: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 2

The thrust of the study is to find out how compact a quasi-helically symmetric stellarator (QHS) can be.

• Drift orbits of particles are confined (deviating from flux surfaces by at most a banana width) if the magnetic spectrum in a coordinate system whose Jacobian is proportional to 1/B2 is dominated by a single helical component.

• It is generally thought that to have good QH the aspect ratio needs to be large, but it is not clear how low the aspect ratio can go before having good helical symmetry is no longer possible.

• HSX is a device having the medium aspect ratio of 8 with 4 field periods, probably the lowest A configuration known in the literature.

• We attempt to see if we can find interesting configurations with A<6.

Page 3: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 3

An example of 3 field-period QHS with A=6 (3H4). This configuration was found with the constraints of positive shear in rotational transform (d/ds>0) and a magnetic well depth of ~1% in the absence of plasma pressure.

Cross sections of LCMS equally spaced in toroidal angle over half-period.

Contours of |B| on LCMS

Page 4: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 4

3H4 has good QH quality:

B(1,1)/B(1,0) > 60 everywhere

B(1,1)/B(0,1) ~6 @ s=1

Page 5: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 5

The effective ripple in 1/ transport is everywhere less than 0.35%.

The energy loss fraction in our model calculation is < 5%.

Page 6: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 6

The configuration can be made more QH by further optimization (3H5):

B(1,1)/B(1,0) > 60 everywhere

B(1,1)/B(2,1)~ 28 @ s=1

Page 7: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 7

Contour plots of |B| on LCMS show excellent QH for 3H5. The energy loss fraction in our model calculation for this configuration is < 0.5%.

Normalized Toroidal Angle

Nor

mal

ized

Pol

oid

al A

ngl

e

Page 8: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 8

But 3H5 is more elongated than 3H4, resulting in the reduced width of the waist at the crescent shaped section.

3H4 3H5

Page 9: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 9

These configurations have high iota, low shear and low well depth in the absence of plasma pressure.

Rotational transform as function of normalized toroidal flux

Well depth (%) as function of normalized toroidal flux

0.8%

0.80<<0.84

Page 10: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 10

As a consequence, they are mostly Mercier unstable:

=6%

=3%

=1%

=0.5%

unstable

An example based on a model broad pressure profile.

Page 11: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 11

Mercier may be improved by increasing the magnetic well depth (3J8):

Cross sections of LCMS equally spaced in toroidal angle over half-period.

3.5%

Page 12: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 12

=1%=3%

=5%

With ~4% magnetic well, the configuration is essentially stable to Mercier for >4%

Page 13: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 13

The deeper well comes at the expense of reduced quality of QH:

B(1,1)/B(1,0) > 50 everywhere

B(1,1)/B(0,1) ~ 4.5 @ s=1

Page 14: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 14

And, the effective ripple is increased significantly. Can we further improve it?

Page 15: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 15

Can we still maintain good QH if the aspect ratio is further reduced? Although there are difficulties, here is a configuration with 3 field periods and aspect ratio 4.5 having reasonably good QH. Much more work awaits!

Page 16: Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.

LPK_091604 16

Issues to be addressed

• Develop configurations with A<6 with good QH, deeper magnetic well, and fatter waist.

• Investigate effects of bootstrap current and iota profiles.

• Analyze MHD stability and find out beta limit.

• Examine flux surface integrity and find ways for island avoidance.

• Study coils and min.