Top Banner
Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities UNCTAD, Geneva United Nations Conference on Trade and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Development
31

Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Hugh Shaw
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM

 September 2006

David Vanzetti

Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities

UNCTAD, Geneva

United Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentUnited Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Page 2: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

ATPSM

• Agricultural Trade Policy Simulation Model

• Static

• Deterministic

• No stocks

• 35 commodities

• 160 countries plus EU25 plus RoW.

Page 3: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Outline

• Features

• Documentation

• Coverage

• Trade policies

• Outputs

• A likely scenario

• Results

Page 4: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

ATPSM Documentation

• Downloadable from website unctad.org/tab• Online help from interface• Updates from website• This ppt presentation available on request

Page 5: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Features

• Free• Easy to use for and researchers, policymakers and

negotiators • Graphical user interface• On-line help function and

handbook available• Report writer - Export to Excel

Page 6: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Limitations

• Bilateral trade issues (non-spatial)• Tariff line level cuts• TRQ definitions (=> overfilled)• C++ version ≠ Excel version

– EU25

– Production quotas

– Land constraint

– Decoupled domestic support

Page 7: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

ATPSM Commodity Aggregation (1)

• Livestock• Bovine meat• Sheepmeat• Pigmeat• Poultry• Milk, fresh• Milk, conc. • Butter • Cheese• Hides and skins• Wheat

• Maize • Sorghum • Barley• Rice• Sugar raw• Sugar refined• Oilseeds, temperate• Oilseeds, tropical

• Vegetable oils

Page 8: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

ATPSM Commodity Aggregation (2)

• Pulses

• Roots, tubers

• Tomatoes

• Non-tropical fruits

• Citrus fruits

• Bananas

• Other tropical fruits

• Coffee green

• Coffee processed

• Cocoa beans

• Cocoa processed

• Tea

• Tobacco leaves

• Tobacco processed

• Rubber

• Cotton linters

Page 9: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Trade Policies Specified

• Global import quota• Bound in-quota tariff rates• Bound out-of-quota tariff rates• Applied tariff rates• Distribution of quota rents• Export subsidies• Domestic support• Production quota• Not suitable for RTAs

Two tier tariff structure

Page 10: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

ATPSM output

• Consumer surplus

• Producer surplus

• Tariff revenue

• Quota rents

• Welfare

• Commodity prices

• Production

• Consumption

• Exports

• Imports

Page 11: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Market Access: Current Tariffs

Bound Applied

High-income countries 51 48Middle-income countries 60 25Low-income countries 78 39

High-income countries 4 3Low & Middle-income countries 20 13

Agriculture

Non-AgricultureSource: UNCTAD TRAINS, WTO

Specific Problems:• Tariff escalation• Tariff peaks

Page 12: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

European Union: bound and applied tariff rates

Note: New AVEs (Paris), Five products with tariffs above 500% not plotted.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1 159 317 475 633 791 949 1107 1265 1423 1581 1739 1897 2055

Olive oil, refinedSugar, raw

Tea

Page 13: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Developing countries: bound and applied tariff rates

Kenya bound and applied tariffs

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 200 400 600 800

bound

applied

Number of tariff lines

Tar

iffs

in p

er c

ent

Bound at ceiling level

Lower applied rates

Page 14: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Market Access: Tiered Formula

Thresholds Cuts

Band % %

1 0 – 30 35

2 30 – 60 45

3 60 – 90 50

4 90 60

Developed Countries

Page 15: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Market Access: Tiered Formula

Thresholds Cuts

Band % %

1 0 – 30 25

2 30 – 80 30

3 80 – 130 35

4 130 40

Developing Countries

Page 16: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Ambitious scenario

• Banded tariff cuts plus caps 100, 150%• Export subsidies -100%• Domestic support -70/-60/-50%, -50%• LDCs 0%.

But• No sensitive products• No special products• No TRQ expansion• No safeguards

Page 17: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Base developing country exports

0100020003000400050006000

700080009000

$m

Total = $117b

Page 18: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Base developing country imports

0100020003000400050006000700080009000

10000

$m

Total = $102b

Page 19: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Base developing country tariff revenueby commodity

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

$m

Total = $14.5b

Page 20: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Base implied tariff by commodity

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

%

Total = 14%

Page 21: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Results

• Prices• Exports• Imports• Welfare

Page 22: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in world prices

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

%

Page 23: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in developing country exportsby commodity

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

%

Page 24: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in developing country exportsby commodity

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

$m

Page 25: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in developing country importsby commodity

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

%

Page 26: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in developing country importsby commodity

-400-300-200-100

0100200300400500600

$m

Page 27: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in welfareby commodity

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

$m

Total = $15004m

Page 28: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Change in welfare Ranked

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

$m

Total = $15b

45 winners (inc EU25)

Page 29: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Implications

• World prices increase• Increase in exports• Increase in global welfare, $15b• But 116 countries worse off (-ve terms of

trade)– Export subsidy removal– bound > applied = few allocative gains– production quota rent

Page 30: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

Improvements?

• Special/sensitive products + compensatory expansion of TRQs

• Tariff line level data• Update data

Page 31: Assessing the agricultural negotiations with ATPSM September 2006 David Vanzetti Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities.

The End