Chp4
165
CHAPTER IVRESULT AND ANALYSIS4.1. THE BRIEF HISTORY OF THE
COMPANYPT Inter Pan Pacifik Futures is part of the Inter Pan Group,
known by a variety of business activities such as financial
services, developers, manufacturing, and international trade since
1989. Since the establishment of the Supervisory Board and the
Commodity Futures Trading (BAPPEBTI Badan Pengawas Perdagangan
Berjangka dan Komoditi) in Indonesia, PT Inter Pan Pacifik Futures
received official permit from BAPPEBTI with license number 427 /
BAPPEBTI / SI / VII / 2004 and is a member of Jakarta Futures
Exchange (JFX) with license number SPAB-056 / BBJ / 12/03 and also
a member of the PT Indonesian Derivatives Clearing House (KBI
Kliring Berjangka Indonesia) with license number 27 / AKKBI / IX /
2004.Figure 4.1 Broker Business License PT Inter Pan Pasifik
FuturesFigure 4.2 Member of Indonesia Derivatives Clearing
In doing business, PT Inter Pan Pacifik Futures is committed to
his partners with the motto "Profiting from the Futures" which
means in order to provide the best investment benefits, PT Inter
Pan Pacifik Futures also provide professional and experienced
brokers in stock market, currencies and world commodities.4.1.1.
Product / Investment of PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures
In PT Inter Pan Pacifik Futures, there are many options to
invest in Futures trading, any market opportunities that brings
benefit can be traded. The products in PT Inter Pan Pacifik Futures
can be seen on Figure 4.3 below.
Figure 4.3 Products of PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures4.1.2.
Transaction MechanismMargin Forex Trading has other features that
is not available in the conventional transactions, such as in the
investment margin trading, the gains can not only be obtained from
a rising price trend (bullish), but can also be obtained from the
declining price trend (bearish), therefore Margin trading can be
done in two ways transaction.4.1.3. Contract Unit/LotIn the Margin
trading transactions, we use LOT for each unit, for example in
Stock trading 1 Lot represents 500 shares, exclude banking stocks,
then in Forex, 1 Lot represents US $ 100,000.00 (for US $ / JPY and
USD / CHF) and the required margin requirement of US $ 1,000.00 /
lot.4.2. THE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization structure for a company or organization plays an
important role since it is the basic structure for a company. The
benefit to create the organization structure chart is for company
to have a clear organization pattern and basis in carrying out
tasks and activities to reach the companies goals and
objectives.
Organization structure is the picture of relationship between
one position to another position in term of authority and
responsibility in delivering and completing tasks and activities.
In PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures Medan, the organization structure
consists of several positions:
a. Regional Managing Directorb. Branch Director
c. Operational Manager
d. Secretary
e. Human Resource
f. EBM (Executive Business Manager)
g. TDA (Sales people)
h. Deputy of Business ManagerBelow is the chart of organization
structure in PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures Medan:4.2.1. Job
Description in PT Inter Pan Pasifik FuturesThe job description of
each position in PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures Medan is as
follow:
a. Regional Managing Director
Supervising all branch office in the regional, and directing
Branch Directors.b. Branch Directors
Monitor every sales team in all branches, and achieve sales
targets based on the target sales of each branch.c. Operational
ManagerResponsible for the daily office operational.
d. SecretaryAssist director in performing duties such as
preparing schedule of activities for director, prepare letters and
others.e. Human ResourcesDeals with recruitment and achieve
recruitment targets every month.f. EBM (Executive Business
Manager)
i. As the head of business deputies
ii. Motivates and trains the sales people
iii. Directs and guides the sales people in each team
iv. Guide sales people to present and prospecting the
customers
v. Achieve sales target every month
g. TDA (Sales people)
i. Contacting potential customers
ii. Prospecting the customers
iii. Close the deal/sales
h. Deputy of Business Manager
Establish his/her own sales team.4.3. DESCTIPTIVE STATISTICSThe
writer distributes questionnaires to respondents to obtain data
about the influence of training program towards employees
performance at PT Inter Pan Pasifik Futures Medan. The respondents
will fill in the questionnaires and the writer will collect the
result and calculate the data. The questionnaires distributed are
46 copies to 46 respondents. It consists of 18 questions, 8
questions representing Variable X (Independent variable or Training
program) and the other 5 questions represent Variable Y (Dependent
Variable or Employees performance)
Each question is provided with 5 (five) alternative answers.
Each answer will have its value. When the respondent answers Very
disagree it is categorized as very low and will be given 1 (one)
point, Disagree will be given 2 (two) points, Moderate worth 3
(three) points, Agree has 4 (four) points and Very agree is 5
(five) points.
The data being analyzed is the data obtained from 46 respondents
or samples. The identity of these respondents can be seen on tables
below.Table 4.1Respondents Gender
NoGenderFrequencyPercentage
01Male2656.52%
02Female2043.48%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015From the data shown above,
there are 46 respondents consisting of 26 male respondents (56.52%)
and 20 female respondents (43.48%).
Table 4.2Respondents Education LevelNoEducation
LevelFrequencyPercentage
01Below/equal high school00.00%
02High School graduates1532.61%
03Diploma12.17%
04Bachelor or higher3065.22%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015From the data shown on table
4.2, there are 46 respondents with no respondent with education
below/equal high school (0%), 15 respondents of high school
graduates (32.61%), 1 respondent (2.17%) has diploma degree and 30
respondents are bachelor or higher graduated (65.22%).Table
4.3Respondents AgeNoAgeFrequencyPercentage
01Below 251532.61%
0225 to 402145.65%
03Above 401021.74%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015From the data shown above,
there are 46 respondents with 15 respondents (32.61%) below 25
years old, 21 respondents (45.65%) range from 25 to 40 years old,
10 respondents (21.74%) are above 40 years old.4.3.1. Analysis of
Independent VariableBefore the writer analyze the result of this
research, the writer would like to quantify respondents answers for
independent variable first by determining the score of each
alternative answers in order to make the data clear and
correct.
Table 4.4Company Provides Good And Suitable
TrainingNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1532.61%
02Agree1226.09%
03Moderate36.52%
04Disagree1532.61%
05Very Disagree12.17%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.4 shows the respondents answers for question
whether the company provides good and suitable training. There are
15 respondents (32.61%) answer very agree, 12 respondents answers
agree (26.09%), while 3 respondents (6.52%) choose moderate.
Moreover, 15 respondents (32.61%) disagree and 1 respondent (2.17%)
very disagree.Table 4.5Employees Like The TrainingNoRespondent's
AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1430.43%
02Agree1532.61%
03Moderate48.70%
04Disagree1123.91%
05Very Disagree24.35%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.5 shows the respondents answers for question
whether the employees like the training provided by the company.
There are 14 respondents (30.43%) answer very agree, 15 respondents
answers agree (32.61%), while 4 respondents (8.70%) choose
moderate. Moreover, 11 respondents (23.91%) disagree and 2
respondent (4.35%) very disagree.Table 4.6Company Differ Employees
Training NoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1430.43%
02Agree1736.96%
03Moderate613.04%
04Disagree919.57%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.6 shows the respondents answers for question
whether the company differentiates the training based on the level
of employees. There are 14 respondents (30.43%) answer very agree,
17 respondents answers agree (36.96%), while 6 respondents (13.04%)
choose moderate. Moreover, 9 respondents (19.57%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.7Employees Understand The
Knowledge From TrainingNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1226.09%
02Agree1736.96%
03Moderate36.52%
04Disagree1328.26%
05Very Disagree12.17%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.7 shows the respondents answers for question
whether the employees understand the knowledge provided from the
training. There are 12 respondents (26.09%) answer very agree, 17
respondents answers agree (36.96%), while 3 respondents (6.52%)
choose moderate. Moreover, 13 respondents (28.26%) disagree and 1
respondent (2.17%) very disagree.Table 4.8Employees Act Positively
In Working ActivityNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1736.96%
02Agree1123.91%
03Moderate613.04%
04Disagree1226.09%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.8 shows the respondents answers for question
whether employees are acting positively in working activity. There
are 17 respondents (36.96%) answer very agree, 11 respondents
answers agree (23.91%), while 6 respondents (13.04%) choose
moderate. Moreover, 12 respondents (26.09%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.9Employees More Confident And
ComfortableNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1634.78%
02Agree1226.09%
03Moderate36.52%
04Disagree1532.61%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.9 shows the respondents answers for question
whether employees feel more confident and comfortable working in
the company. There are 16 respondents (34.78%) answer very agree,
12 respondents answers agree (26.09%), while 3 respondents (6.52%)
choose moderate. Moreover, 15 respondents (32.61%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.10Employees Become More
Productive After TrainingNoRespondent's
AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1430.43%
02Agree1532.61%
03Moderate613.04%
04Disagree1123.91%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.10 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees become more productive after the
training. There are 14 respondents (30.43%) answer very agree, 15
respondents answers agree (32.61%), while 6 respondents (13.04%)
choose moderate. Moreover, 11 respondents (23.91%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.11Employees Want More Advance
Training In The FutureNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1430.43%
02Agree1634.78%
03Moderate1021.74%
04Disagree613.04%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.11 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees would like to have more advance training
in the future. There are 14 respondents (30.43%) answer very agree,
16 respondents answers agree (34.78%), while 10 respondents
(21.74%) choose moderate. Moreover, 6 respondents (13.04%) disagree
and no respondent (0%) very disagree.4.3.2. Analysis of Dependent
VariableThe writer would like to quantify respondents answers for
dependent variable by determining the score of each alternative
answers in order to make the data clear and correct.
Table 4.12Employees are MultitaskingNoRespondent's
AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1532.61%
02Agree1021.74%
03Moderate715.22%
04Disagree1430.43%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.12 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are able to multitask on several related
tasks. There are 15 respondents (32.61%) answer very agree, 10
respondents answers agree (21.74%), while 7 respondents (15.22%)
choose moderate. Moreover, 14 respondents (30.43%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.13Employees Handle All Their
Customers WellNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1430.43%
02Agree1021.74%
03Moderate1021.74%
04Disagree1226.09%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.13 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees handle all their customers well. There
are 14 respondents (30.43%) answer very agree, 10 respondents
answers agree (21.74%), while 10 respondents (21.74%) choose
moderate. Moreover, 12 respondents (26.09%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.14Employees Are
KnowledgeableNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1123.91%
02Agree1634.78%
03Moderate817.39%
04Disagree1123.91%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.14 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are knowledgeable. There are 11
respondents (23.91%) answer very agree, 16 respondents answers
agree (34.78%), while 8 respondents (17.39%) choose moderate.
Moreover, 11 respondents (23.91%) disagree and no respondent (0%)
very disagree.Table 4.15Employees Are Experienced And
SkillfulNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree817.39%
02Agree1736.96%
03Moderate1123.91%
04Disagree1021.74%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.15 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are experienced and skillful. There are
8 respondents (17.39%) answer very agree, 17 respondents answers
agree (36.96%), while 11 respondents (23.91%) choose moderate.
Moreover, 10 respondents (21.74%) disagree and no respondent (0%)
very disagree.Table 4.16Employees Can Carry Out The Tasks Within
The Time LimitNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1839.13%
02Agree1021.74%
03Moderate1123.91%
04Disagree715.22%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.16 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are able to carry out the tasks within
the time limit. There are 18 respondents (39.13%) answer very
agree, 10 respondents answers agree (21.74%), while 11 respondents
(23.91%) choose moderate. Moreover, 7 respondents (15.22%) disagree
and no respondent (0%) very disagree.Table 4.17Employees Have Good
Time ManagementNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1226.09%
02Agree1328.26%
03Moderate613.04%
04Disagree1532.61%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.17 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees have good time management. There are 12
respondents (26.09%) answer very agree, 13 respondents answers
agree (28.26%), while 6 respondents (13.04%) choose moderate.
Moreover, 15 respondents (32.61%) disagree and no respondent (0%)
very disagree.
Table 4.18Employees Seldom Take Off Days Except For
IllnessNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree613.04%
02Agree1532.61%
03Moderate1328.26%
04Disagree1226.09%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.18 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees seldom take off days except for illness.
There are 6 respondents (13.04%) answer very agree, 15 respondents
answers agree (32.61%), while 13 respondents (28.26%) choose
moderate. Moreover, 12 respondents (26.09%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.
Table 4.19Employees Arrive To Work On TimeNoRespondent's
AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1226.09%
02Agree1226.09%
03Moderate1430.43%
04Disagree817.39%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.19 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees arrive to work on time. There are 12
respondents (26.09%) answer very agree, 12 respondents answers
agree (26.09%), while 14 respondents (30.43%) choose moderate.
Moreover, 8 respondents (17.39%) disagree and no respondent (0%)
very disagree.
Table 4.20Employees Are Very Cooperative Among Their
TeamNoRespondent's AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree1123.91%
02Agree1634.78%
03Moderate919.57%
04Disagree1021.74%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.20 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are very cooperative among their team.
There are 11 respondents (23.91%) answer very agree, 16 respondents
answers agree (34.78%), while 9 respondents (19.57%) choose
moderate. Moreover, 10 respondents (21.74%) disagree and no
respondent (0%) very disagree.
Table 4.21Employees Can Follow InstructionsNoRespondent's
AnswerFrequencyPercentage
01Very Agree919.57%
02Agree1839.13%
03Moderate510.87%
04Disagree1430.43%
05Very Disagree00.00%
Total46100.00%
Source: Questionnaire data in 2015
Data on the table 4.21 shows the respondents answers for
question whether employees are able to follow directions and
instructions from supervisor. There are 9 respondents (19.57%)
answer very agree, 18 respondents answers agree (39.13%), while 5
respondents (10.87%) choose moderate. Moreover, 14 respondents
(30.43%) disagree and no respondent (0%) very disagree.
4.4. TEST OF DATA QUALITYTo test data quality, writer will do
several tests consisting of Validity test, Reliability test, Mean,
Median and Mode test, Normality test, Correlation test, Coefficient
of Determination test and Linear Regression test.4.4.1. Validity
Test
The writer has pre-test the validity of questionnaire by
distributing to 20 random samples. Based on the responses to the
questionnaire distributed for variable X (Training program) and
variable Y (Employees performance), the writer then made a summary
of the data in Attachment 2.By conducting validity test, the writer
will know better if the questionnaires distributed to respondents
will have valid answers/value. The writer has conducted the
validity test based on the data in attachment 2 for variable X and
Variable Y. The validity test will be shown in attachment 3 for
Variable X and attachment 4 for Variable Y. Below is the summary of
validity test conducted.Table 4.22Summary of Validity test for
Variable X and Variable Y
ValidityValuesRemarks
X #010.9450Very High validity
X #020.9231Very High validity
X #030.9180Very High validity
X #040.9321Very High validity
X #050.9680Very High validity
X #060.9317Very High validity
X #070.8672Very High validity
X #080.8785Very High validity
Y #010.8687Very High validity
Y #020.9492Very High validity
Y #030.8621Very High validity
Y #040.8342Very High validity
Y #050.9321Very High validity
Y #060.9400Very High validity
Y #070.8748Very High validity
Y #080.8623Very High validity
Y #090.8487Very High validity
Y #100.8406Very High validity
Source: Questionnaire pre-test data in 2015Thus, the writer can
conclude that all the questionnaires are valid.
4.4.2. Reliability test
The writer has pre-test the reliability of questionnaire by
distributing to 20 random samples. Based on the responses to the
questionnaire distributed for variable X (Training program) and
variable Y (Employees performance), the writer then made a summary
of the data in Attachment 2.
By conducting reliability test, the writer will know better if
the questionnaires distributed to respondents will have reliable
answers/value. The writer has conducted the reliability test based
on the data in attachment 2. The reliability test data will be
shown in attachment 5. The formula to test reliability is as
follows:
Where: k = 18
= 58.958
= 278
The reliability result is 0.834. By using reliability scaling in
chapter III, we can see that it is good data reliability; therefore
we can conclude that the questionnaires answers are reliable.
4.4.3. Mean, Median and Mode
The questionnaire will be distributed to 46 respondents. The
data will be shown in attachment 6 for both Variable X (training
program) questionnaires and Variable Y (Employees performance)
questionnaires. For Variable X (training program), there are 8
questions, thus the value can take on any value between 8 and 40
with the scale of:8.0-12.0 = Very disagree
12.1-20.0 = Disagree
20.1-28.0 = Moderate28.1-36.0 = Agree
36.1-40.0= Very agree
The Mean of Variable X is:
So, it means that average answers by respondents are 29.4 which
means the average answer is Agree.The data of Variable X when
arranged in order is
15, 16, 16, 16, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 19, 21, 21, 23, 23, 24,
28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 35, 35, 35,
35, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39Since the total
data of Variable X is even, the calculation of Median is as
follows:
So, it means that the Median of Variable X is 33 which mean that
33 can represent the Variable X data and 33 (Agree) can be used as
the data representative for Variable X.The Modes of Variable X is
35 since it has the most occurrence answer.For Variable Y
(employees performance), there are 10 questions, thus the value can
take on any value between 10 and 50 with the scale of:10.0-15.0 =
Very disagree
15.1-25.0 = Disagree
25.1-35.0 = Moderate
35.1-45.0 = Agree
45.1-50.0= Very agree
The Mean of Variable Y is:
So, it means that average answers by respondents are 35.6 which
means the average answer is Agree.The data of Variable Y when
arranged in order is
22, 22, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 25, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 28, 29, 29,
30, 31, 31, 33, 35, 36, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43,
43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 45, 45, 47, 47, 47, 47, 48, 50Since the total
data of Variable Y is even, the calculation of Median is as
follows:
So, it means that the Median of Variable Y is 36.5 which mean
that 36.5 can represent the Variable Y data and 36.5 (Agree) can be
used as the data representative for Variable Y.The Modes of
Variable Y is 43 since it has the most occurrence answer.4.4.4.
Normality Test
Using the data in attachment 6, we can calculate the data
provided and find whether the data is normally distributed. Then,
we shall input the data into SPSS to find the normality value using
Kolmogorov-Smirnov formula.
From the SPSS result, shown in attachment 7, the normality of
the test is 0.137. Based on Amirs book, if the result is greater
than 0.05, then it will indicate that the data is normally
distributed. 4.4.5. Coefficient of Correlation TestUsing the data
in attachment 6, we can calculate the data provided and find the
relationship of each data. Then, we shall use input the data into
SPSS to find the coefficient of correlation. The formula to find
coefficient of correlation is as follows:
The writer will be able to find out the relationship between
Variable X and Variable Y using Coefficient of Correlation. This
test is used to know the relationship between Variable X (Training
program) with Variable Y (Employees performance) whether the
relationship is positive, negative or no relationship at all.From
the SPSS result, shown in attachment 7, the coefficient of
correlation test is 0.728. We shall refer to coefficient of
correlation scale in chapter III to find the meaning of this
result. It shows that the relationship between Training program
(Variable X) and Employees performance (Variable Y) is Positive and
High relationship. 4.4.6. Coefficient of Determination
The writer has already test the relationship between variable X
and variable Y. Turns out, there is positive and high relationship
between both variables. Thus, the writer will do another test to
know influence or relationship in percentage. The writer will use
coefficient of determination test to calculate the influence by
using formula as follows:
From the SPSS result in attachment 7, the coefficient of
determination result is 52.93%. It is a strong relationship. This
proves that Training program influence Employees performance by
52.93%, while the other 47.07% is influenced by other factors such
as leadership, motivation, discipline, etc.4.4.7. Linear Regression
TestAfter testing the influence of training program (Variable X) to
employees performance (Variable Y), we need to see the concrete
influence by number and how one variable affects the other variable
significantly. The writer will use Linear regression test to know
the influence in number and figure. The formula for linear
regression test is:
Y = a + b X
From the SPSS, we found that the linear regression is:
Y = 11.869 + 0.807 X
Based on the result above, the linear regression is Y = 11.869 +
0.807 X, which means if we increase variable X by certain point,
the value of Variable Y will increase as well. The writer made some
calculations to see the increase percentage as follows:Example:
X = 1, then Y = 11.869 + 0.807 (1) ( 12.676
X = 2, then Y = 11.869 + 0.807 (2) ( 13.483
X = 3, then Y = 11.869 + 0.807 (3) ( 14.290
X = 4, then Y = 11.869 + 0.807 (4) ( 15.097From the example, the
writer can conclude that for every 1 point increase in Variable X
(Training program), Variable Y (Employees performance) will
increase by 0.807 point. The linear graphic can be seen
below.Figure 4.5 Linear Graphic between Variable X and Y
4.5. TEST OF HYPOTHESISThe writer will use Z-test to know the
hypothesis is significant or not.
Zcount = 4.881, thus Zcount = -4.881From the calculations above,
we get the value of Zcount is 4.881 and -Zcount is -4.881.
Figure 4.6: Hypothesis diagram
Thus Zcount is greater than Ztable = 1.96 with confidence level
95% and Ztable is greater than Zcount.Based on the hypothesis
test:If Ztable < Zcount < Ztable, thus H0 is accepted and Ha
is rejected. There is no significance level of relationship between
Training program and Employees performance.
If Zcount > Ztable, thus H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted.
There is significance level of relationship between Training
program and Employees performance.
If Ztable > -Zcount, thus H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted.
There is significance level of relationship between Training
program and Employees Performance.
4.6. RESULT AND ANALYSISBased on the data and calculation that
is done by the writer, the writer got the result and analysis:
a. The coefficient of correlation of Variable X and Y are 0.728.
It means variable X and Y has positive and high relationship or
Training program has positive and high relationship with employees
performance. By providing the right training program for employees,
the employees performance can be boosted.
b. The high relationship is shown by correlation of
determination at 52.93%. It means that Training program influence
employees Performance by 52.93%. Thus, the remaining 47.07% is
influence by other factors such as leadership, motivation,
discipline or other factors. c. In linear regression test, Y =
11.869 + 0.807 X. It means that if we increase variable X (Training
program) by 1 point, variable Y (employees performance) will also
increase by 0.807 point.
d. The z-test is to prove our hypothesis. Z-test shows us that
Zcount is 4.881 and -4.881 Thus Zcount is greater than Ztable=
1.96. Therefore H0 is rejected; it means there is a significance
level of relationship between Training program and Employees
performance.
EMBED Excel.Chart.8 \s
Ho Accepted
Ha Accepted
Ha Accepted
-4.881
0
4.881
34
_1485090243.unknown
_1485094011.unknown
_1485094488.unknown
_1485110730.unknown
_1485111580.xlsChart1
11.869
12.676
13.483
14.29
15.097
East
Training program
Employees' Performance
Sheet1
01234
East11.86912.67613.48314.2915.097
_1485112834.unknown
_1485110743.unknown
_1485094525.unknown
_1485094256.unknown
_1485093209.unknown
_1485093299.unknown
_1485092845.unknown
_1485092688.unknown
_1485092839.unknown
_1485089886.unknown
_1485090000.unknown
_1485089870.unknown