ARTIKEL PENELITIAN KEBOCORAN TEPI BAHAN RESTORASI SETELAH PERENDAMAN LARUTAN ASAM: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIK Diajukan Untuk Memenuhi Persyaratan Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Kedokteran Gigi TAQIA ZULFA NIM: J2A015020 FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN GIGI UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG 2020 https://repository.unimus.ac.id
14
Embed
ARTIKEL PENELITIAN KEBOCORAN TEPI BAHAN RESTORASI …
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
1Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang. Telepon: (024) 74640230, email: [email protected]
2Dosen Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Dokter Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Kebocoran tepi yang terjadi pada suatu restorasi akan menjadi suatu jalan masuk bagi bakteri serta debris yang terdapat pada cairan rongga mulut sehingga berpenetrasi masuk diantara dinding kavitas dan bahan restorasi tanpa dapat dideteksi secara klinis. Rendahnya pH dapat mempengaruhi integritas permukaan bahan restorasi. Bahan material gigi yang cenderung larut bila bereaksi dengan asam. Kelarutan ini akan menyebabkan banyak ruang kosong. Absorpsi air dapat mendegradasi bahan restorasi dan menyebabkan debonding antara gigi dan restorasi, sehingga terjadi kebocoran tepi. Kerusakan enamel yang disebabkan oleh asam cukup signifikan, karena asam yang dikonsumsi mengakibatkan saliva tidak dapat menetralisir suasana di rongga mulut, sehingga asam akan melarutkan enamel gigi, serta mempengaruhi kekasaran dan kekerasan gigi. Tujuan: Mengetahui kebocoran tepi bahan restorasi setelah perendaman dengan larutan asam. Metode: Pada April 2020 dilakukan pencarian pada mesin pencarian jurnal dan artikel menggunakan ScienceDirect, PubMed, dan Google Scholar. Pencarian ini fokus pada kebocoran tepi bahan restorasi setelah perendaman larutan asam. Judul dan abstrak yang terkait tersedia Bahasa Indonesia dan Inggris, dan artikel masuk kedalam kriteria inklusi dan terdapat bacaan seluruhnya. Hasil: Pada tinjauan sistemaik, mesin pencarian mendapatkan 2427 artikel dengan 33 artikel yang masuk dalam kriteria inklusi untuk dilakukan review. Keseluruhan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebocoran tepi pada bahan restorasi terjadi setelah perendaman larutan asam. Kesimpulan: Semua bahan material restorasi dapat mengalami kebocoran tepi membuktikan bahwa semakin lama waktu perendaman dengan larutan asam dapat mengakibatkan semakin besar kebocoran tepi pada bahan restorasi. Kata Kunci: Kebocoran tepi, Perendaman Asam, Bahan Restorasi
1Collage Student Education Program S1 Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang. Phone: (024) 74640230, email: [email protected] 2Lecturer Education Program S1 Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of
Muhammadiyah Semarang
ABSTRACT Introduction: Microleakage in dental material restoration will be an entry point for bacteria or debris on oral cavity and penetration at cavity without detection on dental material clinical. Low pH affect integrity dental material surface. Dental material tend to dissolve if reaction with acid. Solubility will cause empty space. Water absorbtion degradation dental material restorative cause debonding between restoration and teeth, and microleakage happened. Enamel damage caused acid in signifikan, consumtion of acid caused saliva cannot neutralize oral cavity. Objective: to know microleakage dental material restoration after immersed in acid solution. Method: In April 2020 an electronic research of literature was performed, in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search was focused on microleakage of dental material restoration after immersed in acid solution. The related tittle and abstract available in Indonesia and English, and the articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for full text reading. Result: In this systematic review, literature search initially resulted in 2427 articles among which 33 articles only fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and were finally included in the review. Almost all the studies showed that microleakage at dental material restoration happened after immersed on acid solution. Conclusion: Microleakage happened in all dental material restoration. The longest immersion time at acid solution, the higher microleakage at dental material restoration. Keyword: Microleakage, Immersion Acid, Dental Material Restoration
Linares M.C. 2004. Effect of different treatment and storage on the proximate compotition and protein quality in canned tuna. Archivos Latino americanos De Nutricion. 54(1):112-117.
2. Balgi, p., F. Katge. 2017. Comparative
Evaluation Of Microleakage Of Two Newer Glass Ionomer Cement In Primary Molars Immersed In Three Beverages. Ceylon Medical Journal 2017; 62:184-188
3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dental Material Journal 2010. P.1-9.
Stroberi Sebagai Bahan Bleaching. FKG UNAIR. JMKG 2012;1(2):126-133.
8. Navarro, R., Ascension Vicente. 2011. The Effects Of Two Soft Drinks On Bond Strength, Bracket Microleakage, And Adhesive Remnant On Ontact And Sealaed Enamel. European Journal Of Orthodontics 33 (2011) 60-65
9. Saraswati, Widya. 2019. Microleakage
Difference Between Total Etch And Self Etch Bonding In Bulk Fill Packable Composite Restoration After Carbonic Acid Immersion. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 52(4):192
10. Sabdi, Suhaida., Wan Zaripah Wan
Bakar, Adam Husein. 2011. Assessment Of Microleakage Of Few Restorative Materials After Erosion By Acidic Solution. Arch Orofac Sci (2011), 6(2): 66-72.
11. Cenci, M.S. et al., 2008. Influence of
thermal stress in marginal integrity of restorative materials. Journal of applied oral science: revista FOB, 16(2), hal. 106-10. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089200.
12. Allorerung, J., Anindita, P., dan
Gunawan, P. 2015. Uji Kekerasan Resin Komposit Aktivasi Sinar dengan Berbagai Jarak Penyinaran. Jurnal e-Gigi (eG). 3(2), pp, 444-448
13. Maganur PDC. 2016. Evaluation of
microleakage and surface texture of resin modified GIC and flowable composite immersed in soft drink and fresh juice. Bapuji Dental College and Hospital. India.
14. Hashemikamangar, Sedigheh Sadat.
2016. Effect Of Lactid Acid On Microleakage Of Class V Low
15. Syafri, Muhammad., Tunjung Nugraheni, tri Endra Untara. 2014. Perbedaan Kebocoran Mikro Resin Komposit Bulkfill Vibrasi Sonic dan Resin Komposit Nanohibrid pada Kavitas Kelas I. JKed Gi; Vol.5, No. 2, April 2014.
16. Nana, Sudjana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya
17. Mahmoud, E.A., Maha A. Niazy, and Mohamed A. El Yasaky. 2018. Evaluation Of The Effect Of Beverages On Wear Resistance And Microleakage Of Classs V Esthetic Restoration. ADJ-for Grils, Vol.5,No.4.
18. Marcos Aurelio Bonfirm Da Silva . 2015. Evaluation Of The Surface Roughness And Microleakage Of Dental Composites Exposed To Different Beverages. The Journal Of Contemporary Dental Practice, October 2016;16(10): 800-804
19. Tegrani, Maryam Hajenoruzali. 2014. Comparison Of Microleakage Of Two Materials Used As Fissure Sealant With Different Methods. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Feb; 5(2): 171-175
20. Nassief, Sarah. 2020. Hydrochloric Acid Cyclic Exposure Effect On Microleakage Of Resin Cement. J Dent. 2020 13(5); 240-245
21. Kurniawan, P., Isyana E., Yanuar.
2017. Kebocoran tepi restorasi resin komposit nanohybrid setelah perendaman dalam air sungai desa anjir pasar. J.Ked. Gi, Vol II no 1 Maret 2017
light sources on microleakage of bleached enamel. Dent Mater J 2008;27(4):598-604.
23. Alqarni, Mohammed A. 2019.
Microleakage Of Aesthethic Restoration Following Functional Simulation And Immersion In Saudi Traditional Mouth Rinses. J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 15; 7(21): 3630-3633
24. Anusavice, K.J., Chiayi, S., Rawls,
H.R. 2012. Philips’ Science of Dental Materials. Edisi 12: Elsevier.
25. Beriat, N.C. And Nalbant, D. 2007.
Water Absorption And Hema Release Of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer. Eur J Den. 3(4). Pp:267-268
26. Devara, A.R., Lunardhi, Yuanita. 2016. Perbedaan Kebocoran Tepi antar GIC Konvensional dan Resin Modified GIC ada Restorasi Kelas V. Conservative Dentistry Journal.Vol.6 No.2 Juli-Desember 2016: 19-23.
27. Dhurohmah, Mujayanto, R. & Chumaeroh. S., 2014. Pengaruh Waktu Polishing dan Asam Sitrat terhadap Microleakage pada Tumpatan Resin Komposit Nanofiller Aktivasi Light Emiting Diode-In Vitro. ODONTO Dental Journal, 1(1), hal. 11-15
28. Dinakaran, S. 2015. Evaluation Of The
Effect Of Different Food Media On The Marginal Integrity Of Class V Compomer, Conventional And Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration. Journal Of International Oral Health, 7(3), 53-58
29. Eronat, Nesrin. 2014. Comparative
Evaluation Of Microleakage Of Nano-Filled Resin Modified Glass Ionomer. Eur J Dent. 2014 Oct-Dec; 8(4): 450-455
30. Gandaatmadja, D., Mulyawati, E.,
Halim, H.S., dan Widyastuti, W. 2010.
Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Resin Komposit Dan Konsentrasi Bahan Hidrogen Peroksida Pada Perubahan Kekasaran Permukaan Resin Komposit Setelah Prosedur In Office Bleaching. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi, 129 – 134
31. Halim, S. Abd El. 2011. Comparative
Evaluation Of Microlakage Among Three Different Glass Ionomer Types. Oper Dent (2011) 36 (1): 36-42
32. Hamouda, I. M. 2011. Effect of
Various Beverages on Hardness, Rougness, and Solubility of Esthetic Restorative Materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 23(2), pp 315-322.
33. Hussein, Thulfiqar Ali. 2014. The Assessment Of Surface Roughness And Microleakage Of Eroded Tooth Colored Dental Restorative Materials. J Conserv Dent. 17(6): 531-535
34. Katge, F., & Abhinav Shitoot. 2016.
Evaluation of Microleakageof Nanoionomer and Nanocomposite Restorations, immersed in Fruit Drink Fresh Fruit Juice, and Soft Drink. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. Vol 40 no 2/2016
35. Moosavi, Horieh. 2013 .The Effect Of
Different Surface Treatment Of Demineralised Enamel On Microleakage Under Metal Orthodontic Brackets. Prog Orthod. 2013; 14(1): 2
36. Ningsih, Diana Setyo. 2014. Resin
Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Sebagai Material Alternatif Restorasi Untuk Gigi Sulung. Odont Dent Jur. 1(2). Pp: 46-48
37. Nurdin, D., Djustiana, N., dan Febrida, R. 2010. Degree Of Conversion Komposit. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan
Kebocoran Tepi antara Restorasi Resin Komposit Tipe Bulk-Fill dan Tipe Packable dengan Penggunaan Sistem Adhesif Total Etch dan Self etch. Odonto Dental Journal. 3(1), pp 8-13.
39. O’Brien, W.J. 2002. Dental Materials
And Their Selection. Third edition. Canada : Quintessence Books.
40. Punnathara, Sairaj. 2017. A
Comparative Evaluation Of The Influence Of Command Set Methods On Microleakage Of Glass Ionomer Cement. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6): Zc12-Zc15
Kebocoran Mikro Akibat Efek Suhu Terhadap Pengerutan Komposisi Nanohibrid. Jurnal Dentino. 1(2), pp. 108-112.
43. Sosrosoedidjo, B.I., 2004. Glass
Ionomer Modifikasi Resin. IJD. 11(1).Pp: 44-45
44. Tavangar, Maryam. 2016. A
Comparative Evaluation Of Microleakage Of Two Low Shrinkage Composite With A Conventional Resin Composite. J Dent (Shiraz) 2016 Mar; 17(1):55-61
45. Trivedi, Krishna., Vijay Bhaskar,
Mahadevan Ganesh. 2015. Erosive Potential Of Commonly Used Beverages, Medicated Syrup, And Their Effects On Dental Enamel With And Without Restoration. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 2): s474-s480
46. Van Noort R. Introduction to dental material. 3rd ED Toronto: Mosby Elsevier, 2007: 127-40
47. Vanga V. Narshimha. 2011. Effect Of
Cola On Surface Microhardness And Marginal Integrity Of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer And Compomer Restoration. People’s Journal of Scientific Research: Vol.4(2), July 2011.
48. Zanatta, RF. 2017. Microleakage And
Shear Bond Strength Of Composite Restorations Under Cycling Conditions. Oper Dent (2017) 42 (2): E71-E80
49. Zavareh, Farahnaz Arbabzadeh. 2013. Assessment Of Microleakage Of Class V Composite Resin Restoration Following Erbium Dopes Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Conditioning And Acid Atching With Two Different Bonding Systems. J Laser Med Sci Winter 2013;4(1):39-47