Top Banner
Are You Fit To Practise? Peter Charlesworth MSc MCOptom Director of Perceptive Former FTP panel member
19

Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Jan 22, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Are You Fit To Practise?

Peter Charlesworth MSc MCOptom

Director of Perceptive

Former FTP panel member

Page 2: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Disclaimer

As a former member of the FTP committee I amno longer affiliated to the GOC or the FTP process.This presentation is my own opinion and does notrepresent the opinion of the GOC or the FTPcommittee. I have no involvement in the cases Iwill present and am not party to any informationother than in the transcripts and determinationspublicly available on the GOC website

Page 3: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Fitness To Practise

Page 4: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015
Page 5: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

2012/13 Annual Review

From 239 Complaints

Page 6: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

The Process

Page 7: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Fitness To Practise Hearing

Page 8: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Impairment

• The FTP Panel decide whether a registrant’s fitness to practise is ‘impaired’

• The process is concerned with protecting the public and upholding professional standards not punishing the registrant or awarding damages

• Fitness to practise can be ‘impaired’ by:– misconduct– poor performance– criminal conviction or caution– physical or mental health problems

Page 9: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Decision Making

• Fact

• Misconduct

• Impairment

• Sanction

Page 10: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Decision Making

• Misconduct:

Page 11: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Decision Making

• Performance:

Page 12: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Decision Making

• Impairment

Page 13: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Decision Making

• Sanction:

Page 14: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Cases

Page 15: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Recent FTP cases

16

Cases in December 2014

Interim Orders 2

Interim Reviews 5

Substantive Decisions 2

Substantive Reviews 2

Total 11

Cases in December 2014

Optometrists 8 (inc 2 SO)

Dispensing Opticians 3 (inc 1 SD)

Page 17: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Consider

• What are the allegations of the case?

• What are the facts of the case?

– Who did the panel believe & why?

– Would you have done things differently?

• Was misconduct found and if so why?

• Was impairment found and if so for what reason

– Do you agree?

• How did the panel decide on sanction?

– Do you agree?

Page 18: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Summary

• FTP is only one legal route

• Cases are a small proportion of complaints

• Cases take a long time to resolve

• Consider facts on balance of probability

• Committee decides on fitness to practise today

• Considers public, profession and registrant interest

• Apply proportional sanction

Page 19: Are You Fit To Practise Eyecare 2015

Are You Fit To Practise?

Peter Charlesworth MSc MCOptom

Director of Perceptive

Former FTP panel member