Are the I.C.C.-findings and decision correct?

Is the I.C.C decision and findings correct?

Are the I.C.C.-findings and decision correct?V. Jayadevan(The one who developed the VJD system)

The resaons mentioned in the press release to retain D/L system.

Are there no evidences of significant flaws in D/L system? Let us check

SituationD/L target for team-250 over projected score of team-1, D/LVJD-target for team-250 over projected score of team-1, VJDTeam-1, 50/0 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs140231113191Team-1, 50/1 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs115188108181Team-1, 50/2 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs95156103172

SituationD/L target for team-2VJD-target for team-2Team-1 100/0 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs179170Team-1 100/1 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs172164Team-1 100/2 when match interrupted after 20 overs. Team-2 get 20 overs163158Difference in targets of team-2 for team-1s score of 100 and team-1s score of 50 for loss of wickets 0,1 and 2D/LVJDFor zero loss of wickets T(100/0)-T(50/0)39 (179-140)57 (170-113)For the loss of 1 wicket T(100/1)-T(50/1)57 (172-115)56 (164-108)For the loss of 2 wickets T(100/2)-T(50/2)68 (163-95)55 (158-103)

More examples for the statistical flow in D/L system

Team-1s ScoreD/L Par scores at five overs corresponding to wickets 0-901234567892004649535967789511915018122052555863708197121156195240586063677281961191572062606465677074829411515421228070707173778292111147213

OverscompletedWickets down012345678956163656873829511815621089899101103106112121136165210101231241251261291331391511722111214814914915015215415916618221215186186187187188189190194201218Par score table for a T20 match where Team-1 make 250 runs113/5 in 8 overs is a winning score. In 15 overs, 202/8 is a winning score. Par-score for 5 overs and 6 wickets is 95. Same is the par-score for a score of 200 (instead of 250). After 12 overs 148/0, 159/6 and 166/7 are equivalent scores!

Sl.noSituationD/LVJD1England 176/5 after 36, 5 overs when match rescheduled to 46. Then after 37,5 overs when England were 181/5 again rescheduled to 40 overs. England make 193/6 in 40. Target for NZ in 40.2262122SA 226/3 in 42. Four overs lost 250 in 46, Target for India in 46 overs2712603India 226/8 in 47, 1 overs. Target for Pakistan in 33.2021874New Zealand 212/5 in 44, 2 overs, Target for W.I. in 33 overs.2112015Australia 96/1 in 19 when the interruption occurred. Rescheduled to 29. Australia makes 183 in 29. Target for South Africa in 29 (debut of Wincoda 3.0)223209Is not there any clear advantage by using VJD system?Here are some solid examples from real match situations D/L results were very severely criticized in cases #1,#2 and# 4. It was another system which was in use while #3 was played. In #5, D/L just escaped because, SA did not put any fight back. When Australia got most of the power play overs and the final 10 overs, it makes no sense to give such a huge increase in target.

ConclusionsEven with this short presentation it is substantiated here that