Promoting Healthy Environments and Improved Asthma Control in New England Schools: Policy, Practice and Innovation Innovations in New England Thursday, October 16 th , 2014 Indoor Air Quality: CT’s success – Kenny Foscue, MPH, CT Department of Public Health Integrating Environmental Health into School Wellness – Tolle Graham, MassCOSH Green Cleaning Purchasing Contracts – Julia Wolfe, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Operational Services Division NEEP Public Building Operations and Maintenance – Brian Buckley, JD, MA, Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Project CASE (Controlling Asthma in Schools Effectively) – Michelle Barron-Magee, RI Department of Health
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Promoting Healthy Environments and Improved Asthma Control in New England Schools: Policy, Practice and Innovation
Innovations in New EnglandThursday, October 16th, 2014
Indoor Air Quality: CT’s success – Kenny Foscue, MPH, CT Department of Public HealthIntegrating Environmental Health into School Wellness – Tolle Graham, MassCOSH
Green Cleaning Purchasing Contracts – Julia Wolfe, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Operational Services Division
NEEP Public Building Operations and Maintenance – Brian Buckley, JD, MA, Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships
Project CASE (Controlling Asthma in Schools Effectively) – Michelle Barron-Magee, RI Department of Health
Connecticut’s State-BasedMulti-agency
School IEQ Strategy:
The CT School Indoor Environment Resource Team
Kenny Foscue, MPH
Environmental & Occupational Health Assessment Program
CT Department of Public Healthwww.ct.gov/dph/schools www.csiert.org
• 2002 – City- wide Healthy Schools Taskforce formed–Annual inspections for all schools
BUAC, a Program of The Medical Foundation
some history….• 2004: Asthma Coalition released report:
“Who’s Sick at School”• 2005 – Green Cleaning Policy adopted
• 2008 – statewide asthma coalition formed
• 2010 – BPS Wellness Council formed
• 2013 – BPS Wellness Policy incorporates “Healthy School Environments”
The EPA Framework for IAQ Tools for Schools Implementation
1. Infrastructure & Supportive Policies
4. Healthy School
Environment
2. Health & Mental Health
Services
3. Asthma Education
6. Family & Community Involvement
5. Physical Education & Activity
Public Schools District Wellness Policy
Requires every school to form or maintain a Wellness Council to guide school-based practices and systems that improve school health.
Cultural ProficiencySchool Food and Nutrition PromotionComprehensive Physical Activity Comprehensive Health EducationHealthy School EnvironmentHealth ServicesSafe and Supportive SchoolsStaff Wellness•Safe and Supportive Schools
*
Healthy School Environment/Safe and Supportive Schools
*
Healthy School Environment:
•Schools implement existing policies to promote and manage school environments. This includes the use of green cleaners, school-based recycling, a tobacco-free environment, water access, and well-maintained school facilities.
Steps:
•Principal reads annual report and prioritizes issues for Wellness Council to address
•Wellness Council creates an action plan for those issues
•Wellness Council includes school community in actions
BPS ENVIRONMETNAL AUDIT RESULTS 2004 - 2011
These two graphs on this page are showing overall district trends, specifically, the % of schools each year where at
least 5% of the spaces inspected had recorded “incidents”.
Examples of Wellness Action steps for Healthy Environments
• Organize a school “clutter-free” clean up 1-2 times a year (add fun incentives; set up swap/ give away tables)
• Encourage all staff to use IPM log to document signs of pests and read quarterly inspection reports
• Ask BPS to supply bottles for the approved “green cleaner”
• Conduct your own “environmental walkthrough” (train students as environmental ambassadors)
• Review list of work orders that have been filled or not completed
MAAP – MA Asthma Advocacy Partnership
• 2009-2014 State Plan - shared model from Boston and other urban asthma coalitions for healthy schools
• New Plan (2014- 2020) – Includes primary prevention roadmap– Share / include inclusion of
environmental health in other school district wellness policies
• Central Purchasing Agency of the Commonwealth• Responsible for establishing statewide contracts• 1.4 billion in purchases last year ~ 140 contracts• “best value” contracts
Goal: Leverage purchasing power of state & local government
• Health & Safety: – Involves greater safety in handling for cleaning staff and IAQ for occupants– Safer ingredients: Common cleaning products have been linked to triggering asthmatic episodes,
cancer, effects on the nervous system, reproductive organs, kidneys, liver and hormones
– Automatic dispensing systems which reduces exposure to employees
• Environment: – “Approved Products” are 3rd party certified: Environmental criteria: concentrates, packaging,
reduced or eliminates hazardous chemicals
• Savings: – Use single product with different dilution rates – Automatic dispensing systems: reduces over use of products / exposure to employees / efficient
– Disinfect only where needed: Reduces the cost of higher priced disinfectants; healthier
– Microfiber: reusable; versatile
– Chem-free options: equipment eliminates the need to buy chemicals, or reduces use (e.g., steam cleaning)
Products are 3rd Party Certified Independently 3d Party Certified through Green Seal or Ecologo: • Verify green claims• Make sure products work• No need to analyze data sheets• No need for concern of various
• Contract Advantages– Certified products means evaluated & tested– OSD oversight for vendor performance – Request additional products on the contract as needed
• Choosing a Vendor– 16 Vendors - Talk to more than one; ideas and services can vary– Find one with location near you, references – Check their Green Program – quality of their staff, training
capabilities
• Transitioning– Facility Assessment - FREE– Vendor expertise in choosing comparable products– Ask to “pilot” products in areas of concern
Innovations in New England: O & M, NE-CHPS, and more
October 16, 2014
Brian D. BuckleyHigh Performance Buildings Associate
PRESENTATION SUMMARY
1. About NEEP
2. NEEP’s Schools and Public Buildings O&M Guide
• IAQ Examples
• Energy Efficiency Examples
3. Northeast Collaborative for High Performance Schools
4. Resources
52
1. ABOUT NEEP
53
NORTHEAST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PARTNERSHIPS“Accelerating Energy Efficiency”
54
MISSIONAccelerate the efficient use of energy in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions
APPROACHOvercome barriers to efficiency through Collaboration, Education & Advocacy
VISIONTransform the way we think about and use energy in the world around us.
One of six Regional Energy Efficiency Organizations (REEOs) designated by U.S. Dept. of Energy to work collaboratively with them in linking regions to DOE guidance, products
2. NEEP’S SCHOOL AND PUBLIC BUILDING OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE GUIDE
(FREE @ NEEP.ORG/PUBLICBUILDINGS)
55
REGIONAL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE GUIDE Strategies for creating green, healthy & energy efficientexisting buildings in your school or municipal building
WHAT IS IT?• A pathway for existing Schools
and Public Building to adopt high performance operation and maintenance strategies
• Many low cost ideas• Regionally developed• 15 sections
Project CASE is a multi-level, multi-component pilot intervention targeting school-age students with asthma within three RI core cities. CASE aims to decrease the burden of asthma by• Improving the environmental health of
schools.• Increasing student and caregiver
knowledge of how to self-manage asthma.
Project CASE
Project CASE
• Increasing staff knowledge of how to recognize and decrease asthma triggers in the school environment.
• Supporting students in effectively managing their asthma.
CASE components include:• Asthma education for staff, students
and caregivers delivered by the Hasbro Children Hospital’s, Draw A Breath Program.
• Environmental walk-through within the schools.
• Communication (SNT’s, PCP’s and AAP’s).
Project CASE
CASE schools were chosen based on the following criteria:• Location in areas of high asthma burden
as reported by surveillance of claims data
• Chronic absenteeism rates as high as 21%
• Poor physical environment• Parent reports
CASE
Additional Data/Demographics:• Asthma dx of 14-21%• Within a three year period, between 11-
15% of these students had an asthma-related ED visit or hospitalization.
• 54% Hispanic, 30% African American• 80-99% eligible for Federal Free and
Reduced Price School Meal Program compared to 46% statewide.
principals and school nurse teachers• RI Department of Education• Environmental Justice League of RI• Family Services RI• Hasbro Children’s Hospital• RI Asthma Control Coalition• RI Department of Education
CASE
Internal Support Staff• Asthma Control Program• Healthy Homes and Environment Team
Moving Forward• Add on four CASE schools annually • Work from the top/down with school
districts.• Involve the school districts in choosing
which schools to implement CASE.• Utilize Kidsnet to increase the use of