D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware Apr 9, 2005 Scaling of Askaryan Pulses
Dec 21, 2015
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
E iEi iSin 3 x t x, tei , x
Sum over particles/Integrate over shower
Shower Front + Light Cone
i t
Density of Excess Projected Track Length
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Phase Factors and Rescaling FF
Most MC’s use this
z 2 c
zsin tan c 1 cos 2 c
z tan c
y 2 c
ytan ccos sin 2 cy tan c
Gy, y f yyeiy,, y, z y f yyei ayy; ay 2
ctan ccos sin
Gy0, ay GyayGz, Gzaz; az 2
csin tan c 1 cos
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
AVZ, ZHS, (G4 later)
E, 0, ice 2.53 107 0 1
1.01.44 ,
Gy 1
1.01.44 , f0 2.53 107
0Sinc0 (units?).
AVZ Use a Gaussian, and give the half-width of the Cerenkov cone at 1 GHz as 3.72 ° for a 1 PeV (3.1 m) shower.
Determine Gz as FT of gaussian
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3nu
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
G y
Gy avz black , zhs red
0 0.05 0.10.15 0.20.25 0.3nu
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1G z
Gz avz black , zhs red
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Scaling vs AVZ
Field calculation is integral over shower profile
Separation of shower profile
Separation of form factors
With scaled frequencies• Adapted from Alvarez, Vazquez, Zas• “Full sim” is approx a
• Blue – Gaussian for f(z), AVZ approx c for Gy
• Red – Griessen for f(z)
Separation of phase factors
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Scaling with energy and type
Comparison of em and hadronic shower length
-2 0 2 4 6 8LogEPeV1
1.5
2
2.5
3
hslhsl me
VeP
-2 0 2 4 6 8LogEPeV0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
goLhsl
hslmeVeP
f0 : l tot E
d EdxGy : Rm doesn't change
Gz : lshi, E
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Scaling with medium
AVZ scaled
G4
f0 : l tot iE
d EdxGy : RM
Esd Edx
Gz : lsh x X
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Scaling behavior
fractional excess
Single particle & shower signals
Includes LPM effect
z
y
c
to observer
ivt
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Pulse shapes
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-400
-200
0
200
400
EVmc
f0avz ,gyavz ,gzavz ,phisavzeev : 0.01d: 2.r: 0.00001
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 20.48mat : icetype : em
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2GHz0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1
0001xE
Vmc
zHG E:black , Gy:red , Gz:blue , Gatt:green
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Scaling model w/Shahid’s G4 10 TeV shower
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-400
-300-200-100
0100200300
EVmc f0sh ,gysh ,gzsh ,phisavzeev : 1d: 2.r: 1
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 5.12mat : icetype : em
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-100
-50
0
50
EVmc f0sh ,gysh ,gzsh ,phisavz
eev : 1d: 4.r: 1
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 5.12mat : icetype : em
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-50
0
50
100
EVmc f0sh ,gysh ,gzsh ,phisavz
eev : 1d: 4.r: 1
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 5.12mat : icetype : em
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-300
-200-100
0100200300
EVmc f0sh ,gysh ,gzsh ,phisavz
eev : 1d: 2.r: 1
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 5.12mat : icetype : em
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-750
-500-250
0250500750
EVmc f0sh ,gysh ,gzsh ,phisavz
eev : 1d: 0.r: 1
dnu : 0.02nu0 : 5.12mat : icetype : em
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Multiple showers
-4 -2 0 2 4tns-0.000075
-0.00005
-0.000025
0
0.000025
0.00005
0.000075EVmmc
Comparison of RF signal from split shower blackto original redSeparation of 4. m, distance 1km, d 4°, e 1
Ask
arya
n pu
lses
, UC
I, A
pr 9
, 200
5 (S
ecke
l)
Acoustic (in progress)
• Same as radio except– scalar vs vector– total track length– v/c is smaller– attenuation– experiment bandwidth