Appropriate imaging for back pain Dr David Lisle Brisbane Private Imaging Royal Brisbane Hospital University of Queensland
Appropriate imaging for back pain
Dr David Lisle
Brisbane Private ImagingRoyal Brisbane HospitalUniversity of Queensland
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities• Clinical presentations• Guidelines• Children
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities– Radiographs (X-rays)– Scintigraphy (bone scan)– CT– MRI
• Clinical presentations• Guidelines• Children
Radiographs
What you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Disc height
Radiographs
What you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Disc height
Disadvantages
• Radiation• Nonspecific
– OA changes in most adults
• Insensitive– No direct visualisation
of neural and other nonbony structures
Bone scan
What you see
• Bone pathology– Osteoblastic activity
Bone scan
What you see
• Bone pathology– Osteoblastic activity
Disadvantages
• Radiation• Very nonspecific• Relatively poor
anatomical resolution– (Improved with
SPECT; SPECT/CT)– No direct visualisation
of neural and other nonbony structures
CT
What you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Cross sectional view of spinal canal and foramina
• Disc, thecal sac, nerve roots
CT
What you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Cross sectional view of spinal canal and foramina
• Disc, thecal sac, nerve roots
Disadvantages
• Radiation• Nonspecific
– Most adults have ‘findings’
• Poor visualisation of individual neural structures and disc anatomy
Radiation doses
Imaging test Effective dose (mSv)
CXRs Background exposure
Flying hours
CXR 0.02 1 3 days 4
Lumbar X-ray 1.5 75 6/12 300
Lumbar CT 2-10 100-500 8/12 - 3 years 400 - 1800
Bone scan 6 300 2 years 1200
MRIWhat you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Bone pathology• Multiplanar view of
spinal canal and foramina
• Disc: hydration and structure
• Neural structures: cord, nerve roots
MRIWhat you see
• Bony anatomy and alignment
• Bone pathology• Multiplanar view of
spinal canal and foramina
• Disc: hydration and structure
• Neural structures: cord, nerve roots
Disadvantages
• Availability, cost• Pacemakers,
claustrophobia• Nonspecific (too
sensitive)– Most adults have
‘findings’
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities• Clinical presentations: classification into 3
broad categories1. Nonspecific low back pain2. Back pain associated with radiculopathy3. Back pain associated with a specific
cause requiring prompt evaluation• Guidelines• Children
Back pain categories
1. Nonspecific (mechanical) low back pain– Acute: < 12 weeks– Chronic: > 12 weeks– Ligament/ muscle strain/ tear– Intervertebral disc degeneration– Osteoarthritis
– Facet joints– SI joints
– Spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis
Back pain categories
2. Back pain associated with radiculopathya) Unilateral acute nerve root compression
(sciatica)– Leg pain >> back pain– Disc herniation
b) Unilateral chronic nerve root compression– Disc herniation or spinal stenosis
c) Bilateral chronic nerve root compression– Spinal stenosis– DD vascular claudication
d) Bilateral acute nerve root compression = ‘cauda equina syndrome’
Cauda equina syndrome
• Bilateral acute nerve root compression– Massive disc protrusion/ sequestration
• Sudden onset bilateral leg pain• Saddle anaesthesia• Rapidly progressive or severe neurological
deficits– Motor deficits at >1 level– Faecal incontinence– Urinary retention
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Cauda equina syndrome− Cancer− Vertebral infection− Vertebral compression fracture− Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Cauda equina syndrome− Clinical scenario
− Cancer− Vertebral infection− Vertebral compression fracture− Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Cancer− Hx of Ca + new onset LBP− Unexplained weight loss +/-
persistent symptoms +/- age > 50− Vertebral infection− Vertebral compression fracture− Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Vertebral infection− Fever− iv drug use− Recent infection
− Vertebral compression fracture− Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Vertebral compression fracture− Hx of osteoporosis− Steroid use− Old age +/- minor trauma
− Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain categories
3. Back pain associated with a specific cause requiring prompt evaluation− Ankylosing spondylitis (seronegative
SpA)− Nonmechanical, inflammatory type of
back pain: morning stiffness; improved with exercise
− Alternating buttock pain− Waking at night− Younger age
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities• Clinical presentations• Guidelines
– Multiple: different countries and associations
– Common theme:• Triage into 3 broad categories as
described• Children
LOW BACK PAIN GUIDELINESDiagnostic triage
1.Non-specific LBP2.Radiculopathy3.Specific LBP
• ‘Red flags’
‘Red Flags’• Cauda equina syndrome• Known 10 tumour• Weight loss• Severe symptoms, not
settling• Fever• Recent infection or Sx• Osteoporosis• Steroid use• Non-mechanical pain• Child*
LOW BACK PAIN GUIDELINES• American College of Physicians & American
Pain Society Recommendations
1.Focused Hx and examination to place patients into 1 of 3 categories
2.No imaging for nonspecific LBP3. Imaging for LBP + severe or progressive
neurological deficits OR risk factors for specific cause
4. Imaging for LBP and radiculopathy if candidates for surgery or epidural injection
Ann Intern Med 2007;147:478-491
Diagnostic work-up
Possible cause Imaging Additional studiesNonspecific LBP None NoneRadiculopathy MRI (CT)Cauda equina MRICancer MRI for known 10; X-ray
for other eg wt lossESR
Vertebral infection MRI ESR, CRPVertebral compression # X-rayAnkylosing spondylitis X-ray, incl pelvis (MRI) HLA-B27; ESR, CRP
Ann Intern Med 2007;147:478-491
www.imagingpathways.health.wa.gov.au
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) UKACR Appropriateness Criteria
Ineffectiveness of imaging for nonspecific LBP
• Favourable natural Hx– Most improve by 4 weeks; unaffected by imaging
• Nonspecificity: loose association between findings and symptoms– ‘Abnormalities’ or normal aging?
• Potential harms:– Radiation– ‘Labelling’– Incidental findings
Ann Intern Med 2011;154:181-190
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities• Clinical presentations• Guidelines• Children
Back pain in children and adolescents
Presentation Associated Sx DD Ix
Night pain Fever, malaise Tumour, infection X-rayMRI
Acute pain Radiculopathy+ve SLR
Disc herniationSpondylosis
X-rayMRI
Chronic pain Rigid kyphosisMorning stiffness
“Scheuermann’s”Inflammatory arthropathy
X-ray
Pain with extensionSport: eg rowing
Hamstring tightness Spondylolysis‘Stress reaction’
X-rayMRI
Pain + recent onset scoliosis
Fever, malaise, +ve SLR
Idiopathic scoliosisTumour, infection, syrinx, disc herniation
X-rayMRI
Am Fam Phys 2007;76:1669-76
MRI: paediatric items
• Referral by a medical practitioner– (Excluding specialist or consultant
physician)• Age under 16• Issues re GA/ sedation• Practical terms: 5/6 to 15
– Younger for a ‘good’ kid– Older for a ‘not so good’ kid
MRI: paediatric items
• Head• Spine, following radiographic examination• Knee following radiographic examination
for internal derangement• Hip following radiographic examination• Elbow following radiographic examination• Wrist following radiographic examination
MRI: paediatric items
• Head
• Spine, following radiographic examination– Significant trauma– Neck or back pain + neurological signs– Back pain, significant pathology suspected
• Knee following radiographic examination for internal derangement
• Hip following radiographic examination• Elbow following radiographic examination• Wrist following radiographic examination
9M
Spine trauma
Neck pain + neurology
9F
Back pain, gymnast
11F
STIR T1
Appropriate imaging for back pain
• Imaging modalities• Clinical presentations• Guidelines• Children
Thank you