Top Banner
Mazen Kherallah, MD, FCCP Mazen Kherallah, MD, FCCP King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center Center Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
98

Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

casta

Mazen Kherallah, MD, FCCP King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center. Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks. Shock Definition. Question #0. Which of the following is necessary in the definition of shock? (a) A drop in the systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Mazen Kherallah, MD, FCCPMazen Kherallah, MD, FCCPKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Page 2: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Shock Definition

Page 3: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #0

Which of the following is necessary in the definition of shock?

• (a) A drop in the systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg

• (b) A drop in the mean arterial pressure of less than 60 mm Hg

• (c) A drop in the SBP of 40 mm Hg or 20% from baseline

• (d) An elevated lactic acid of ≥ 4 mmoL/L• (e) Any of the above

Page 4: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #1

• Which of the following is necessary in the definition of shock?

• (a) Hypotension

• (b) Tissue hypoxia

• (c) Use of pressors

• (d) Multiple organ dysfunction

Page 5: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Shock

• Profound and widespread reduction in the effective delivery of oxygen leading to first to reversible, and then if prolonged, to irreversible cellular hypoxia and organ dysfunction” Kumar and Parrillo

• Leads to Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS)

Page 6: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Pathophysiology

Page 7: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Pathophysiology

VO2

DO2Oxygen delivery

Oxygen uptake Oxygen extraction ratio

Page 8: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Mizock BA. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:80-93.

Oxy

gen

Co

nsu

mp

tio

n

Oxygen Delivery

Critical DeliveryThreshold

Lactic

Aci

dosis

Physiologic Oxygen Supply Dependency

Page 9: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

sepsissepsisSepsissepsis

Page 10: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Mizock BA. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:80-93.

Oxy

gen

Co

nsu

mp

tio

n

Oxygen Delivery

Pathologic

Physiologic

Pathologic Oxygen Supply Dependency

Page 11: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Pathophysiology

• Most forms of shock – Low cardiac output state

– Supply-dependency of systemic VO2

• Septic shock– Systemic DO2 and VO2 are both supranormal, but an

oxygen deficit remains

– Peripheral oxygen extraction may be deranged and VO2 is pathologically supply-dependent

– Possible microvascular maldistribution of perfusion

Page 12: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #2

• Which is not an important determinant of oxygen delivery?

• (a) Hemoglobin level

• (b) Cardiac output

• (c) pO2

• (d) SaO2

Page 13: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Oxygen Delivery (DO2)

Cardiac Output x Oxygen Content

CO x [(1.3 x Hgb x SaO2) + (0.003 x PaO2)]– Hemoglobin concentration– SaO2

– Cardiac output– PaO2 (minimal)

Page 14: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

HR SV CO

PreloadContractility

Cardiac Output

Afterload

Page 15: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

• Determined by end-diastolic volume

• Pressure and volume related by compliance of the ventricle

Page 16: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure versus left ventricular end-diastolic

volume

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

LVEDV (ml/m2)

LV

ED

P (

mm

HG

)

Decreased compliance Normal compliance

Page 17: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Cardiac Output

• Sterling relationship

Volume loading

Card

iac

outp

ut

Page 18: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

5 10 15 20 25 30

PAOP (mmHg)

LV

SW

I (g

.m/m

2)

Hypodynamic Normal Hyperdynamic

Clinical Adaptation of the Sterling Myocardial Function

Curves

Page 19: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

SVR CO MAP

SV HR

Global Hemodynamic Relationships

PreloadContractility

Afterload

Page 20: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #3

• Which can cause low preload?

• (a) High PEEP

• (b) Tension pneumothorax

• (c) Third spacing

• (d) Positive pressure ventilation

• (e) All of the above

Page 21: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Pathophysiology

• Inadequate/ineffective DO2 leads to anaerobic metabolism

• Large/prolonged oxygen deficit causes decrease of high-energy phosphates stores

• Membrane depolarization, intracellular edema, loss of membrane integrity and ultimately cell death

Page 22: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Effects of Shock at Cellular Level

Page 23: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 24: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Common Histopathology Associated with

Tissue Hypoperfusion and Shock?

Page 25: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Histopathology of Tissue Hypoperfusion Associated with

Shock

Coagulative necrosisCoagulative necrosis

Contraction bandsContraction bands

EdemaEdema

Neutrophil infiltrateNeutrophil infiltrate

Myocardium

Diffuse alveolar damageDiffuse alveolar damage

Exudate, atelectasisExudate, atelectasis

EdemaEdema

Hyaline membraneHyaline membrane

Lung

Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005

Page 26: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Mucosal infarctionMucosal infarction

Hemorrhagic mucosaHemorrhagic mucosa

Epithelium absentEpithelium absent

Small Intestine Liver

Centrilobular hemorrhagic necrosisCentrilobular hemorrhagic necrosis

Nutmeg appearance Nutmeg appearance

Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005

Histopathology of Tissue Hypoperfusion Associated with

Shock

Page 27: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Histopathology of Tissue Hypoperfusion Associated with

Shock

Brain

Eosinophilia and shrinkage of Eosinophilia and shrinkage of neuronsneurons

Neutrophil infiltrationNeutrophil infiltration

Bland infarct Bland infarct

Punctate hemorrhagesPunctate hemorrhages

Brain

Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005

Page 28: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Histopathology of Tissue Hypoperfusion Associated with

Shock

Kidney

Tubular cells, necroticTubular cells, necrotic

Detached from basement membraneDetached from basement membrane

Swollen, vacuolatedSwollen, vacuolated

Pancreas

Fat necrosisFat necrosis

Parenchymal necrosisParenchymal necrosis

Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease: 2005

Page 29: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Incidence of Ischemic Histopathology in Patients Dying with Shock

Hypovolemicn = 102 (%)

Septic n = 93 (%)

Cardiogenicn = 197 (%)

Heart 37 17 100

Lung 55 65 10

Kidney 25 18 11

Liver 46 30 56

Intestine 9 26 16

Pancreas 7 6 3

Brain 6 3 4McGovern VJ, Pathol Annu 1984;19:15McGovern VJ, Pathol Annu 1984;19:15

Page 30: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Shock Syndromes

Page 31: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

ShockCardiogenic shock - a major component of the the mortality associated with cardiovascular disease (the #1 cause of U.S. deaths)

Hypovolemic shock - the major contributor to early mortality from trauma (the #1 cause of death in those < 45 years of age)

Septic shock - the most common cause of death in American ICUs (the 13th leading cause of death overall in US)

Page 32: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

Afterload

Contractility

Arterialpressure

Cardiacoutput

Peripheralresistance

Heartrate

Strokevolume

Leftventricular

size

Myocardialfiber

shortening

Cardiac Performance

Page 33: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Compensatory Mechanisms

Page 34: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Case 1

• 34 year old involved in a motor vehicle accident arrived to emergency room with blood pressure of 70/30 and heart rate of 140/min

Page 35: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #5

• Which is typical of hypovolemic shock?

• (a) High SVR

• (b) High cardiac output

• (c) High oxygen delivery

• (d) Normal wedge pressure

Page 36: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

Afterload

Contractility

Arterialpressure

Cardiacoutput

Peripheralresistance

Heartrate

Strokevolume

Leftventricular

size

Myocardialfiber

shortening

Hypovolemic Shock

Compensatory MechanismAdrenaline

Page 37: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

CO SVR PWP EDV

Hypovolemic

Cardiogenic

Obstructiveafterloadpreload

Distributivepre-resuscpost-resusc

Hypovolemic Shock Hemodynamics

Page 38: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Hemorrhagic • Trauma• Gastrointestinal• Retroperitoneal

Fluid depletion (nonhemorrhagic)• External fluid loss

- Dehydration- Vomiting- Diarrhea- Polyuria

• Interstitial fluid redistribution- Thermal injury- Trauma- Anaphylaxis

Increased vascular capacitance (venodilatation)• Sepsis• Anaphylaxis• Toxins/drugs

Kumar and Parrillo, 2001

Hypovolemic Shock

Page 39: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Case 2

• 54 year old with acute onset chest pain arrived to emergency room with blood pressure of 70/30 and heart rate of 140/min

Page 40: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #5

• Which is typical of cardiogenic shock?

• (a) Low SVR

• (b) High cardiac output

• (c) Low oxygen delivery

• (d) Low wedge pressure

Page 41: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

Afterload

Contractility

Arterialpressure

Cardiacoutput

Peripheralresistance

Heartrate

Strokevolume

Leftventricular

size

Myocardialfiber

shortening

Cardiogenic Shock

Compensatory MechanismAdrenaline

Page 42: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

CO SVR PWP EDV

Hypovolemic

Cardiogenic

Obstructiveafterloadpreload

Distributivepre-resuscpost-resusc

Cardiogenic Shock Hemodynamics

Page 43: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Kumar and Parrillo, 2001

Myopathic• Myocardial infarction (hibernating myocardium)• Left ventricle

Right ventricleMyocardial contusion (trauma)MyocarditisCardiomyopathyPost-ischemic myocardial stunningSeptic myocardial depressionPharmacologic

• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity• Calcium channel blockers

Mechanical• Valvular failure (stenotic or regurgitant)• Hypertropic cardiomyopathy• Ventricular septal defect

Arrhythmic• Bradycardia• Tachycardia

Cardiogenic Shock

Page 44: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Case 3

• 67 year old with fever, chills, SOB, and ugly looking abdominal wound arrived to emergency room with blood pressure of 70/30 and heart rate of 140/min

Page 45: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #6

• Which is not typical of sepsis?

• (a) Low SVR

• (b) High cardiac output

• (c) Low oxygen delivery

• (d) Low wedge pressure

Page 46: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

Afterload

Contractility

Arterialpressure

Cardiacoutput

Peripheralresistance

Heartrate

Strokevolume

Leftventricular

size

Myocardialfiber

shortening

Distributive Shock

Compensatory MechanismAdrenaline

Page 47: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

CO SVR PWP EDV

Hypovolemic

Cardiogenic

Obstructiveafterloadpreload

Distributivepre-resuscpost-resusc

Distributive Hemodynamics

Page 48: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Kumar and Parrillo, 2001

Septic (bacterial, fungal, viral, rickettsial)

Toxic shock syndrome

Anaphylactic, anaphylactoid

Neurogenic (spinal shock)

Endocrinologic• Adrenal crisis• Thyroid storm

Toxic (e.g., nitroprusside, bretylium)

Distributive Shock

Page 49: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Preload

Afterload

Contractility

Arterialpressure

Cardiacoutput

Peripheralresistance

Heartrate

Strokevolume

Leftventricular

size

Myocardialfiber

shortening

Obstructive Shock

Compensatory MechanismAdrenaline

Page 50: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

CO SVR PWP EDV

Hypovolemic

Cardiogenic

Obstructiveafterloadpreload

Distributivepre-resuscpost-resusc

Obstructive Shock Hemodynamics

Page 51: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Kumar and Parrillo, 2001

Impaired diastolic filling (decreased ventricular preload)• Direct venous obstruction (vena cava)

- Intrathoracic obstructive tumors

• Increased intrathoracic pressure- Tension pneumothorax

- Mechanical ventilation (with excessive pressure or volume depletion)

- Asthma

• Decreased cardiac compliance- Constrictive pericarditis

- Cardiac tamponade

Impaired systolic contraction (increased ventricular afterload)• Right ventricle

- Pulmonary embolus (massive)

- Acute pulmonary hypertension

• Left ventricle- Saddle embolus

- Aortic dissection

Extracardiac Obstructive Shock

Page 52: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Clinical Features

Page 53: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Symptoms of Shock

• Anxiety /Nervousness• Dizziness• Weakness• Faintness• Nausea & Vomiting• Thirst• Confusion• Decreased UO

• Hx of Trauma / other illness

• Vomiting & Diarrhoea

• Chest Pain• Fevers / Rigors• SOB

General Symptoms Specific Symptoms

Page 54: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Signs of ShockPale

Cold & ClammySweatingCyanosis

TachycardiaTachypnoea

Confused / AggiatatedUnconscious

Hypotensive/OliguricStridor / SOB

Page 55: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Capillary Refill

Page 56: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Skin Mottling

Page 57: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Skin Mottling

Page 58: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Diagnosis and Evaluation

• Primary diagnosis - tachycardia, tachypnea, oliguria, encephalopathy (confusion), peripheral hypoperfusion (mottled, poor capillary refill vs. hyperemic and warm), hypotension

• Differential DX: – JVP - hypovolemic vs. cardiogenic– Left S3, S4, new murmurs – cardiogenic– Right heart failure - PE, tamponade– Pulsus paradoxus, Kussmaul’s sign – tamponade– Fever, rigors, infection focus - septic – Poor skin turgor and dry mucous membranes: hypovolemic

Page 59: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Unable to produce Tachycardia

• Limited cardiac response to catecholamine stimulation: elderly

• Autonomic dysfunction: DM

• Concurrent use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents

• The presence of a pacemaker

Page 60: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Severity of Hemorrhage

Comparison of Adult vs Child

Page 61: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Classification of Hemorrhagic Shock

Class I Class II Class III Class IV

Blood loss (ml) Up to 750 750-1500 1500-2000 >2000

Blood loss (%) Up to 15% 15-30% 30-40% >40%

Pulse rate <100 >100 >120 >140

Blood pressure Normal Normal Decreased Decreased

Pulse pressure Normal Decreased Decreased Decreased

Respiratory rate

14-20 20-30 30-40 >35

Urine output (ml/h)

>30 20-30 5-15 Negligible

CNS/mental status

Slightly anxious

Mildly anxious

Anxious/ confused

Confused/ lethargic

Fluid replacement

Crystalloid Crystalloid Crystalloid/ blood

Crystalloid/ Blood

Page 62: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 63: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 64: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Shock Evaluation and Monitoring

Page 65: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Initial Therapeutic Steps

A Clinical Approach to Shock Diagnosis and Management

Admit to intensive care unit (ICU)

Venous access (1 or 2 large-bore catheters)

Central venous catheter

Arterial catheter

EKG monitoring

Pulse oximetry

Urine output monitoring

Hemodynamic support (MAP < 60 mmHg)

• Fluid challenge• Vasopressors for severe shock unresponsive to fluids

Page 66: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Diagnosis and Evaluation

• Hgb, WBC, platelets

• PT/PTT

• Electrolytes, arterial blood gases

• BUN, Cr

• Ca, Mg

• Serum lactate• ECG

Laboratory

Page 67: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

A Clinical Approach to Shock Diagnosis and Management

• CXR

• Abdominal views*

• CT scan abdomen or chest*

• Echocardiogram*

• Pulmonary perfusion scan*

* When indicated

Initial Diagnostic Steps

Page 68: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Diagnosis Remains Undefined orHemodynamic Status Requires Repeated Fluid Challenges or

Vasopressors

A Clinical Approach to Shock Diagnosis and Management

Pulmonary Artery Catheterization

• Cardiac output• Oxygen delivery– MVO2– DO and VO• Filling pressures

Echocardiography

• Pericardial fluid• Cardiac function• Valve or shunt abnormalities

Page 69: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Hemodynamic MonitoringMeasurement of PCWP

Page 70: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 71: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Components of the Atrial Waves

Page 72: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

The difference between CVP and PCWP waves

Page 73: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

The mean of the A wave approximates ventricular end-

diastolic pressure

Page 74: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Reading CVP

V A

c

Page 75: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Reading PCWP

A

V

VA

Page 76: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Reading the mean of an A wave

22+10/2=16

Page 77: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Question #7

• Which is true about the “wedge”?

• (a) Measures LVEDV

• (b) Falsely elevated by PEEP

• (c) Increased in pulmonary HTN

• (d) Accurately measured in mitral stenosis

Page 78: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Wedge Pressure

• Correlates well with LA and LVEDP if normal anatomy

• Reliable measure of preload (volume) only with normal/stable ventricular compliance

• Falsely elevated by PEEP (and auto-PEEP)

Page 79: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Shock Management

Page 80: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Management

• Treatment of underlying cause

• Volume

• Vasopressors

Page 81: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

A Clinical Approach to ShockDiagnosis and Management

Identify source of blood or fluid loss in hypovolemic shock

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), cardiac angiography, and revascularization for LV infarction

Echocardiography, cardiac cath and corrective surgery for mechanical abnormality

Pericardiocentesis surgical drainage for pericardial tamponade

Thrombolytic therapy, embolectomy for pulmonary embolism

Source control and early broad antibiotics for septic shock

Page 82: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Perfusion Goals in Patients with Septic Shock

HEMODYNAMCS

MAP > 60 mm HgPAOP = 12 - 18 mmHgCardiac Index > 2.2 L/min/m2

ORGAN PERFUSION

CNS - improved sensoriumSkin - warm, well perfusedRenal - UOP > 0.5 cc/kg/hrDecreasing lactate (<2.2 mM/L)Improved renal, liver fucntion

O2 DELIVERY ADEQUACY

Arterial Hgb SpO2 > 92%Hgb concentration > 9 gm/dLSVO2 > 65%Blood Lactate Conc < 2 mM/L

Page 83: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Volume Therapy

Crystalloids

• Lactated Ringer’s solution• Normal saline

Colloids

• Hetastarch• Albumin

Packed red blood cells

Infuse to physiologic endpoints

Page 84: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al 2001;345:1368-1377.

Early Goal Directed Therapy89

Page 85: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 86: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

49.2%

33.3%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Standard Therapy N=133

EGDTN=130

P = 0.01*

*Key difference was in sudden CV collapse, not MODS

Early Goal-Directed Therapy Results:28 Day Mortality

Vascular Collapse

21% vs 10%

p=0.02

MODS

22% vs 16%

P=0.27

NEJM 2001;345:1368-77.

Mortality %

Page 87: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. 2001;345:1368-1377.

In-hospital mortality

(all patients)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 Standard therapyEGDT

28-day mortality

60-day mortality

NNT to prevent 1 event (death) = 6 - 8M

ort

ali

ty (

%)

The Importance of Early Goal-DirectedThe Importance of Early Goal-DirectedTherapy for Sepsis-induced HypoperfusionTherapy for Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion

92

Page 88: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

SepsisSIRS Severe Sepsis Septic ShockInfection

Early Goal Directed Therapy

Early Goal-Directed Therapy (EGDT): involves adjustments of cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility to balance O2 delivery with O2 demand: Fluids, Blood, and Inotropes

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. NEJM 2001;345:1368.

CVP > 8-12 mm Hg MAP > 65 mm Hg Urine Output > 0.5 ml/kg/hr ScvO2 > 70% SaO2 > 93% Hct > 30%

*

Therapies Across The Sepsis Continuum

Page 89: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Type of Fluids

Page 90: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Therapy: Resuscitation Fluids

• Crystalloid vs. colloid

• Optimal PWP 10 - 12 vs. 15 - 18 mm Hg

• 20-40 mL/kg fluid challenge in hypovolemic or septic shock with

• Re-challenges of 5 - 10 mL/kg

• 100 - 200 mL challenges in cardiogenic

Page 91: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Vasoactive Agent Receptor Activity

Agent a1 a2 b1 b2 Dopa

Dobutamine + + ++++ ++ 0

Dopamine ++/+++ ? ++++ ++ ++++

Epinephrine ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ 0

Norepinephrine +++ +++ +/++ 0 0

Phenylephrine ++/+++ + ? 0 0

Page 92: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

0

Vasopressors/Inotrops

Page 93: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 94: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 95: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks
Page 96: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Dopamine Norepinephrine

Page 97: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Take Home Points

• Shock is defined by inadequate tissue oxygenation, not hypotension

• Oxygen delivery depends primarily on CO, Hgb and SaO2 (not pO2)

• Volume expand with crystalloids and blood, if indicated; then add vasoactive drugs to improve vital organ perfusion

• Early treatment of shock is critical

Page 98: Approach and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Shocks

Thank You