Application of levee breach Application of levee breach safety evaluation for safety evaluation for overtopping overtopping Korea Institute of Construction Technology Research fellow Yoon Kwang Seok Researcher Chu Hyun Jae May 6 2008 4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence
17
Embed
Application of levee breach safety evaluation for overtopping Korea Institute of Construction Technology Research fellow Yoon Kwang Seok Researcher Chu.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Application of levee breach safety Application of levee breach safety
evaluation for overtoppingevaluation for overtopping
Korea Institute of Construction Technology
Research fellow Yoon Kwang Seok
Researcher Chu Hyun Jae
May 6 2008
4th International Symposium on Flood Defence
1. Introduction
2. Previous Study Review
3. Application of Safety Evaluation
4. Concluding Remarks
CONTENTSCONTENTS
4th International Symposium on Flood Defence
1. Introduction1. Introduction
Motivations
• Increase of a levee breach by overflow
Objectives
• Safety evaluation of the levee when the overflow occurs
2. Previous study review2. Previous study review
Breach condition by overtopping (Apel et al., 2006)
• Difference between a load factor and a resistance factor
• Load factor: Critical flow qcrit
• Resistance factor: Actual flow qa
2. Previous study review2. Previous study review
Estimation of actual flow qa (Kortenhaus et al., 2002)
• Actual flow qa = A hE3/2
- hE: overflow depth (hu) + velocity head (v02/2g)
- A: geometric parameter of levee (Oumeraci et al., 1999)
hk = height of levee
Bk = crest width
Rk = radius of curvature
Cw = contraction flow
Cn = slope of outer talus
Cm = slope of inner talus
2. Previous study review2. Previous study review
Estimation of critical flow qcrit (Vrijling, 2000)
• Inner talus of a levee
• Critical flow qc (qcrit)
• Critical flow velocity vc
- vc : critical velocity (m/s)
- : inner talus (degree)
- k : roughness of the inner talus (m)
- fg : quality of the levee turf ( )
(0.7 for bad turf
1.4 for turf good quality)
- te : overflow duration (hour)
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Levee breach cases by overtopping
• The July 2006 flood in Jinju (July 8, 2006 ~ July 10, 2006)
• Study reach : the Nam River
Watershed : 711.9 km2
Length of river : 51.8 km
Yeongcheon River basin
Outline of field survey
Basin River Management
Designfrequency Location No. of
BreachCause ofBreach Remarks
NamRiver
NamRiver
Nationalgovernment 100 years
Majinje 1
Overtopping
- Contraction of
section
- Bended channel
- Backwater effect
from the main
channel
Daegokje 3
Daegok stream
Localgovernment2nd Grade
50 years Deokgokje 5
YeongcheonRiver
Localgovernment2nd Grade
80 years
YeoncheonRiver 5
Munsanstream 1
Total - 15 -
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Inundation area
Breach : 68m
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0. 0010. 010. 1110100
(mm)입경 (
%)통
과중
량백
분율
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Rainfall data collection
• The July 2006 flood in Jinju
Stations Period Office Note
Jinju8 July
~ 10 JulyKMA
Hourly
data
Jinyang, Chilgok,
Jungam
8 July
~ 10 JulyMOCT
Hourly
data
Sugok, Sinan8 July
~ 10 JulyKWRC
Hourly
data
Munsan, Gumgok,
Daegok, Jisu,…
8 July
~ 10 JulyJinju
Hourly
Data
Daega,
Yeonghyeon,
Yeongo,
Gaecheon
8 July
~ 10 JulyGosung
Hourly
data
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Flood discharge
• 5 sub-basins in the Nam River, 6 sub-basins in the Yeongcheo
n River
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Flood discharge
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation
Flood level
• Estimation of flood level from flood discharge (HEC-RAS)
3. Application of safety evaluation3. Application of safety evaluation