Application No: Application Type: FULLmygov.elmbridge.gov.uk/documents/s9981/20160813... · • Disruption during construction. One letter of support was also received. The application

Application No: 2016/0813 Application Type: FULL

Case Officer: Aneta Mantio Ward:

St Georges Hill

Expiry Date: 03/06/2016 Location: Charters Cavendish Road Weybridge Surrey KT13 0JN

Proposal: A pair of semi-detached houses, one three storey with basement and integral garage and one two storey house with basement and new access from Egerton Road following demolition of existing house

Applicant: Mr D Houghton

Agent:

Mrs Emily Temple Pegasus Group Abbey House Grenville Place Bracknell Bracknell Forest RG12 1BP

Decision Level: If Permit – Sub-Committee If Refuse – Sub-Committee

Recommendation: Permit

Representations: 5 objections have been received concerned with the following issues: • The proposed development is too big; • Loss of amenities – light, overshadowing, overlooking, noise & wildlife; • Highway implications (insufficient parking proposed, pedestrian safety); • Disruption during construction.

One letter of support was also received. The application has been promoted by Cllr Harman if the recommendation is to permit.

R e p o r t Description

1. The application site of 692sqm (0.07ha) is a corner plot located to the north of Egerton Road and to the east of Cavendish Road in Weybridge. It is currently occupied by a detached two-storey dwelling with an integral double garage. The ground level of the site slopes down to the northeast/rear corner of the plot. The site lies within the Lower St Georges Hill and East of Brooklands Road Environs character area as defined in the Weybridge Settlement Companion Guide to the Design and Character SPD. Constraints

2. The relevant planning constraints are:

• TBH SPA 5km buffer zone • Settlement area

Policy

3. In addition to the National Planning Policy Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance, the following local policies and guidance are relevant to the determination of this application:

Core Strategy 2011 CS1 – Spatial Strategy CS2 – Housing provision, location and distribution CS4 – Weybridge CS13 – Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area CS17 – Local Character, Density and Design CS21 – Affordable housing Development Management Plan 2015 DM1 – Presumption in favour of sustainable development DM2 – Design and amenity DM6 – Landscape and trees DM7 – Access and parking DM8 – Refuse and recycling Design & Character SPD 2012 Companion Guide: Weybridge Developer Contributions SPD 2012

4. History Reference Description Decision 2015/0742 A pair of semi-detached houses, one

three storey with basement and integral garage and one two storey house with basement and new access from Egerton Road following demolition of existing house

Refused and subsequently dismissed on appeal. The reasons for dismissal are discussed in the report below.

2013/5127 2 semi-detached houses, one tree storey with integral garage and one three storey with associated parking and new access from Edgerton Road following demolition of existing house

Withdrawn

Proposal

5. Planning permission is sought for a pair of semi-detached houses, one three storey with basement and integral garage and one two storey house with basement and new access from Egerton Road following demolition of existing house. This is an amended proposal to the latter refused and dismissed on appeal.

6. The proposed pair of semi-detached dwellings would measure approximately a maximum of 14.2m deep, 19.3m wide with a ridge height of 9.05m, compared with the previously considered maximum height of 8.8m (Plot 1) and 6.2m (Plot 2). Separation distances to the side boundaries of the application site would be maintained at 1m and 4m to the north and south respectively (as previously). The garden spaces would be provided in the form of front and rear gardens. Plot 1 (located to the north of the application site) would offer two off-street parking spaces in the form of a driveway and a garage; and Plot 2 two driveway parking spaces. The development would utilise the existing vehicular accesses from Cavendish Road for Plot 1 and proposes an additional access from Egerton Road that would serve Plot 2. Two sets of 1.7m high timber gates with approximately 1.9m boundary wall are also proposed.

Consultations

7. Surrey County Council (Transportation) – The Highway Authority has assessed the impact of the proposal on highway safety and capacity and raised no objections subject to conditions and informative. The development is considered in accordance with Policy DM7 of the Development Management Plan 2015 and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012.

8. Tree Officer – Raised no objections.

Positive and Proactive Engagement

9. In assessing this application, officers have worked with the applicant in a positive and proactive manner consistent with the requirements of 186-187 of the NPPF by making available pre-application advice to seek to resolve problems before the application was submitted and to foster the delivery of sustainable development.

10. No formal pre-application advice was sought prior to the submission of the current application.

Planning Considerations

11. The most recent application, ref. 2015/0742 was refused and subsequently dismissed on appeal. The Inspector in his decision letter outlined that the proposed development ‘would appear out of character in this location. The proposed use of render would jar with the local pallet of materials in the vicinity of the appeal site, which is predominantly brick. This in combination with the proposed form of the building, being flat roofed with a horizontal emphasis, would give the building a stark, bulky and dominant appearance in the plot and street scene. I therefore find that it would be a discordant addition to the street in a prominent location, with little visual affinity with the character and appearance of the area.’

12. The following matters were previously considered acceptable – the principle of development, impact on residential amenities and on highway including access and parking, and provision of contribution towards the SAMM (Strategic Access Management and Monitoring) – please see the officer’s report ref. 2015/0742 for detailed assessment. Due to the timing and the shift in the Government’s view on the matter of provision of the affordable housing for smaller sites such this, the affordable housing contribution was agreed at the appeal stage. The report below still includes references to the above matters should these be materially altered by the current proposal.

13. Based on the above, the relevant planning considerations in the determination of this application are:

• Principle of development • Impact on the character of the surrounding area • Impact on residential amenities • Impact on highway, including access and parking • Financial considerations

with a particular emphasis on the proposal’s design and appearance within the street. Principle of development

14. Throughout the previous planning history, and as confirmed by the Inspector dealing with the last application at appeal, the principle of subdivision of the site and the implementation of two residential units has been considered acceptable. The design of the proposal and its impact on the character of the area and the street scene

15. The area surrounding the application site is characterised by a variety of residential properties, generally consisting of terraced, semi-detached and detached dwellings as well as flats. As the proposal includes a pair of semi-detached dwellings, these are not considered at odds or harmful to the character of the surrounding area in principle.

16. The contemporary design was subject to objection by the Council (ref. 2015/0742) and in combination with the proposed unusual external materials resulted in the dismissal of the subsequent appeal. The Inspector’s view was that the proposal should have some affinity with its location. In connection with another development in the wider area it was also suggested by the Inspector that ‘a contemporary approach has employed a harmonious form and use of

material which enables it to be both contemporary whilst respectful of the character of the area.’

17. The current proposal seeks to implement a hybrid building in terms of design (its appearance and palette of the external materials) that would employ a mixture of traditional and contemporary features. The proposed building would comprise gables within the north/side and west/front elevations with pitched roof sloping away from Egerton Road within the south elevation. Contemporary bay windows would appear within both the Cavendish and Egerton Road street scenes and the elevations would include large areas of glazing to enable better use of natural light. The external materials would include bricks, tile or metal clad roofing material with metal railings and timber gate within otherwise brick boundary wall matching the brick of the dwellings.

18. The omission of large flat roofs, being replaced with pitched roofs of ‘L’ shaped footprint and the use of gables would reflect the more traditional buildings in the surrounding area, which would be reinforced by the use of bricks, which are common in the vicinity. Whilst an indication of these external materials was provided, it is considered that greater clarification would be necessary to ascertain the final appearance of the proposed development as a whole. This can be secured by a suitably worded condition.

19. The overall height of the development would increase. However due to the roofs sloping away from both road frontages, the development is not considered to appear overly dominant or overbearing within the street scene.

20. In conclusion, whilst the proposed building would be of a distinctive design, this would reflect a degree of affinity with the surrounding built form and it is considered that the proposal addresses the previous reason for refusal. The impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties and future occupiers

21. The proposed layout takes into account the neighbouring properties in terms of light and privacy. The rear projection would not infringe upon the 45-degree line taken from the nearest habitable room windows of the ‘Cavendish Court’ or ‘Malabar’ to the north and east respectively. As such, it is not considered that the proposal would result in any adverse loss of light to the neighbouring properties.

22. The flank wall of Plot 1 would accommodate one window above the ground floor level that would serve a second floor en-suite. However this would be set back from the side boundary and due to the layout of the neighbouring property, this window is not considered result in any adverse overlooking and loss of privacy to this neighbouring property.

23. The proposed building would not be located any closer to ‘Malabar’ than the existing dwelling. The existing separation distance of 20.3m between the rear wall of Plot 1 and the flank wall of the above neighbouring property would be retained. This is considered sufficient as not to result in any adverse overlooking and loss of privacy to the occupiers of ‘Malabar’.

24. As the application site is a corner plot, an effective solid boundary treatment is proposed to enable the use of the front gardens as private amenity areas by the future occupiers. Whilst of unusual design concept, sufficient garden amenity areas are considered to be provided for the future occupiers. It is also considered however that any further encroachment on these areas would result in insufficient gardens to the future occupiers and therefore the restriction of the permitted development falling within the Classes A and E is necessary. A relevant condition could be imposed. Access and parking

25. County Highway Authority has undertaken an assessment in terms of the likely net additional traffic generation, access arrangements and parking provision and is satisfied that subject to conditions the application would not have a material impact on the safety and operation of the adjoining public highway. The County Highway Authority seeks to impose relevant conditions

and informative in order not to prejudice highway safety nor cause inconvenience to other highway users. Impact on the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area

26. The application site lies within the 5km buffer zone of the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area. To mitigate the impact of the additional residential occupancy within the buffer zone, the applicant is required to enter into a legal agreement to secure a financial contribution towards the Strategic Access Management and Monitoring (SAMM). A satisfactory unilateral agreement has been received. Financial considerations New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination

27. Section 70 subsection 2 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) states that any local financial considerations are a matter to which local planning authorities must have regard to in determining planning applications; as far as they are material for the application. The weight to be attached to these considerations is a matter for the Council.

28. The New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination is a grant paid by central government to local councils for increasing the number of homes and their use. The New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination is paid each year for 6 years. It is based on the amount of extra Council Tax revenue raised for new-build homes, conversions and long-term empty homes brought back into use. There is also an extra payment for providing affordable homes. The Council’s New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination allocation for 2016-17 is £2.96m.

29. Local financial considerations are defined as grants from Government or sums payable to the authority under the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). This means that the New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination is capable of being a material consideration where relevant. In the current case, the approval of the application would mean that the New Homes Bonus Scheme Grant Determination would be payable for the net increase in dwellings from this development.

Affordable Housing

30. Policy CS21: Affordable Housing of the Council’s Core Strategy (2011) requires that development resulting in the net gain of 1-4 residential units should provide a financial contribution equivalent to the cost of 20% of the gross number of dwellings on site as Affordable Housing.

31. Following a Court of Appeal decision which found in favour of the Government, paragraphs 012-023 of the National Planning Policy Guidance on planning obligations have been reintroduced. These paragraphs and the Ministerial Statement are now a material consideration, alongside local planning policy, against which the Council must consider all planning applications. However, given that the local plan remains the primary consideration against which decisions must be made, the Council is continuing to apply policy CS21 Affordable Housing as set out in the Core Strategy. Following receipt of legal advice, the Council has produced a statement to set out local evidence in support of continuing to apply policy CS21 to this application in light of the revised PPG. This is available to view on the Planning Services webpages.

32. The applicant did not submit a viability assessment, but provided a legal agreement to secure the required contribution towards the affordable housing as part of this application in line with Policy CS21.

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)

33. The development falls under development which is liable for CIL. The applicant has provided the relevant liability forms required to pay the chargeable amount required by the Council’s adopted Charging Schedule in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Matters raised in Representations

34. The matters raised have been addressed in the planning considerations above, however the outstanding matter is dealt with below:

• While the concerns of the local resident in terms of the disruption including noise and traffic implications that may be caused by the construction works are noted, it is not the planning system’s role to obstruct development on this basis. Inevitably, any construction works may lead to some temporary disruption. Ordinarily, the requirements of Environmental Health legislation will seek to limit any harm so far as reasonably practicable. A standard informative would be added to permissions to draw this matter to the attention of the applicant. Furthermore, a condition is suggested requesting method of construction statement to be approved prior to commencement of works to minimise any such disruption.

Conclusion

35. On the basis of the above, and in light of any other material considerations, the proposal is considered to overcome the previous reason for dismissal of the appeal (application ref. 2015/0742) and to be in accordance with the development plan. Accordingly, the recommendation is to grant permission

Case Officer Checklist Neighbour Notifications AMA 27/04/2016 Consultations AMA 27/04/2016 Drawings AMA 27/04/2016 Site Visit Notes AMA 16/06/2016

Recommendation: Grant Permission

Conditions/Reasons 1 TIME LIMIT (FULL APPLICATION)

The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason: To comply with Section 51 of Part 4 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2 LIST OF APPROVED PLANS

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the following list of approved plans: A GA(00) 02A, A GA(10) 00, A GA(10) 01, A GA(10) 02, A GA(10) 03, A GA(10) 04, A GA(11) 02, A GA(11) 03, A GA(11) 04, A GA(12) 01, A GA(12) 02, all received on 09/03/2016.

Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out in a satisfactory manner.

3 PD LIMITATION

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town & Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 2015 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting that Order) no development falling within Part 1 Classes A and E of Schedule 2 to the said Order shall be carried out within

the curtilage of any dwellinghouse, unless planning permission is first granted by the Borough Council.

Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the future occupiers and the character of the surrounding area, and to comply with Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015 and Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy 2011.

4 MATERIALS SAMPLES

NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL SAMPLES OF THE MATERIALS TO BE USED ON THE EXTERNAL FACES AND ROOF OF THE BUILDING HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL. DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DETAILS. Reason: To ensure that a satisfactory external appearance is achieved of the development in accordance with Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015. It is considered necessary for this to be a pre-commencement condition because the use of satisfactory external materials goes to the heart of the planning permission.

5 LANDSCAPING - SCHEME

NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL FULL DETAILS OF BOTH HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING WORKS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL AND THESE WORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS APPROVED. THIS SCHEME SHALL INCLUDE INDICATIONS OF ALL HARD SURFACES, WALLS, FENCES, ACCESS FEATURES, THE EXISTING TREES AND HEDGES TO BE RETAINED, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PLANTING TO BE CARRIED OUT, AND DETAILS OF THE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

Reason: To preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

6 LANDSCAPING - IMPLEMENTATION

ALL HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING WORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DETAILS. ARBORICULTURAL WORK TO EXISTING TREES SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT, OTHERWISE ALL REMAINING LANDSCAPING WORK AND NEW PLANTING SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO THE OCCUPATION OF ANY PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OR IN ACCORDANCE TO THE TIMETABLE AGREED WITH THE BOROUGH COUNCIL. ANY TREES OR PLANTS, WHICH WITHIN A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS IN PURSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT DIE, ARE REMOVED, OR BECOME SERIOUSLY DAMAGED OR DISEASED, SHALL BE REPLACED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE WITH OTHERS OF SIMILAR SIZE AND SPECIES, FOLLOWING CONSULTATION WITH THE BOROUGH COUNCIL, UNLESS THE BOROUGH COUNCIL GIVES WRITTEN CONSENT TO ANY VARIATION.

Reason: To preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

7 NEW ACCESS/MODIFIED ACCESS

The development hereby approved shall not be first occupied unless and until the proposed vehicular access to Egerton Road has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans (and to provide vehicular visibility splay of 2m by 43m and the maximum achievable pedestrian visibility splay) and thereafter the visibility zones shall be kept permanently clear of any obstruction over 1.05m high.

Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety, the free flow of traffic nor cause inconvenience to other highway users in accordance with Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

8 OPENING OF GATES

The access gates shall only open into the site.

Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety nor cause inconvenience to other highway users and to satisfy Policy DM7 of the Development Management Plan 2015 & Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy.

9 HIGHWAY OBSTRUCTION

No obstruction shall overhang the highway along the site frontage onto Cavendish Road and Egerton Road between 0.6 metres and 2 metres high above the ground.

Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety nor cause inconvenience to other highway users and to satisfy Policy DM7 of the Development Management Plan 2015 & Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy.

Informatives 1 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

The development permitted is subject to a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability for which a Liability Notice will be issued as soon as practical after the day on which planning permission first permits development.

To avoid breaching the CIL regulations and the potential financial penalties involved, it is essential a prior commencement notice be submitted. A blank commencement notice can be downloaded from http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/1app/forms/form_6_commencement_notice.pdf. For the avoidance of doubt commencement of demolition of existing structure(s) covering any part of the footprint of the proposed structure(s) would be considered as commencement for the purpose of the CIL regulations.

2 NEW VEHICLE CROSSOVERS AND DROPPED KERBS The permission hereby granted shall not be construed as authority to carry out any works on the highway. The applicant is advised that prior approval must be obtained from the Highway Authority before any works are carried out on any footway, footpath, carriageway, or verge to form a vehicle crossover or to install dropped kerbs. Please see www.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/road-permits-and-licences/vehicle-crossovers-or-dropped-kerbs.

3 MATERIALS DEPOSITED ON THE HIGHWAY The developer is reminded that it is an offence to allow materials to be carried from the site and deposited on or damage the highway from uncleaned wheels or badly loaded vehicles. The County Highway Authority will seek, wherever possible, to recover any expenses incurred in clearing, cleaning or repairing highway surfaces and prosecutes persistent offenders. (Highways Act 1980, Sections 131, 148, 149).

Figured dimensions only are to be taken from this drawing.All dimensions are to be checked on site before any work is put in hand.Where applicable this drawing must be read in conjunction withadditional information prepared by Fletcher Crane Ltd and/ or others.

Client's name

Scale:

Drawn Job No Status: Drawing NoChecked Date Rev

Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310

Charters, Cavendish Road, Weybridge, KT13 0JNHoughton Property Developments LtdThe Loft, Cowleaze House, 39-45 Cowleaze Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT2 6DZ

T +44 (0)20 8546 1640

www.fletchercranearchitects.com

Fletcher Crane Architects Ltd

Mark Revision Drawn Date Checked

*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(00) 02A

Proposed Site Plan0 20(40)m

RL

RL

RL

Loggia

RL

RL

+6.250

+8.9

00

45°

45°

45°

45°

1,5°

1,5

°

+9.050 Ridge Level

+8.8

00

+6.250

+6.050 Eaves Level

+6.0

50

E

aves L

evel

B

B

EGERTON ROAD

CA

VE

ND

ISH

RO

AD

Cavendish Court

Malabar

408

572

412

Existing Tree Removed

Existing Tree Removed

Existing TreeRemoved

285

281

280

New TreeProposed

New TreeProposed

Site Boundary

Site Boundary

10872

9517

20366

15570

1020

2.1

4.2

4.2

4079

7784

6759

9133

23556

6756

20813

5297

14000

14182

10178

28504780

2548


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(10) 00

Proposed Basement Floor Plan

Site Area = 629m² (0.063Ha)

0 10(20)m

-07

-08

-09

-10

-11

-12

-13

-12

-14

-11

-12

-13

-14

-15

-16

-10

-09

-17

-08

rise=218mm run=242mm approx rise=218mm run=242mm approx

-04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16-03 -17

UP

UP

-12 -11 -10 -09 -08 -07 -06 -05 -04 -03 -02 -0100-04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14-0100 -03-02

UP

UP

-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17

UP

UP

rise=216mm run=250mm


A

A

B

B

Plot 02105.5m² Ground Floor GIFA

Plot 01102.8m² Basement Floor GIFA

Site Boundary

Site Boundary

Ensuite5.4m²

Bathroom5.4m²

Bedroom17.2m²

Hallway18.7m²

Store Room11.9m²

Purp

le d

otted lin

e d

enote

s b

uild

ing a

bove

Gym Studio13.1m²

Under Stair Storage

Family Room25.m²

Bathroom5.3m²

Ensuite4.0m²

Plant5.1m²

- 3.150

SteppedPatio

- 2.850

Bedroom9.6m²

Playroom

Cupbd

Wardrobe3.4m²

Gym Studio31.2m²

SteppedGarden

SteppedGarden

SteppedGarden

Outdoor Patio

Outdoor Patio Outdoor Patio

Outdoor Patio


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

A GA(10) 01

Proposed Ground Floor Plan

MZ TF 01.02.2016

Site Area = 629m² (0.063Ha)

0 10(20)m

-02

-01

00

-04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14-0100 -03-02 -12 -11 -10 -09 -08 -07 -06 -05 -04 -03 -02-13-14

UPUP

UP

UP

Gen140L

Recycle140L

rise=218mm run=242mm approx

New TreeProposed

New TreeProposed

06

05

04

03

02

01

07

08

00

-04

-03

-02

-01

00



-02 -03 -04 -05

0504030201-0100 -02

-03-02

-04-05



-04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16-03 -17

rise=218mm run=242mm approx

00

-01

-02

-03

EGERTON ROAD

CA

VE

ND

ISH

RO

AD

Cavendish Court

Malabar

Gen140L

Recycle140L

10904 Rear Garden Length

20329

A

A

B

B

WC2.3m²

Kitchen17.5m²

Dining Area20.5m²

Bin Store

Snug13.2m²

Cloaks2.0m²

Plot 0291.9m² Ground Floor GIFA 341.8m² Grand Total GIFA

+0.200

+0.000

+0.000

+0.000

-0.100

Garden160m²

Garden50m²

FP

Kitchen13.8m²

WC1.8m²

Larder1.4m²

Dining Room15.8m²

Hallway

Hallway

Garage18.0m²

Plot 0165.5m² Ground Floor GIFA (excluding garage)285.5m² Grand Total GIFA (304.6m² including garage)

± 0.000

± 0.000

- 0.300

- 0.300

-0.650

Dotted lin

e d

enote

s b

uild

ing a

bove

Dotted line denotes building above

UP

UP

UP

UP

Garden118m²

- 0.300

UP

- 1.000

- 0.900

- 0.000

- 0.300

Site Boundary

Site Boundary

SteppedGarden

Utility Area7.1m²

Study8.0m²

+0.000

SteppedGarden

SteppedGarden

Low Level Planting

SteppedGarden

Family Room19.5m²

-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17

+0.400


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

A GA(10) 02

Proposed First Floor Plan

MZ TF 01.02.2016

0 10(20)m

New TreeProposed

New TreeProposed

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

08

09

11

12

13

14

24

07

15

16

10

20330RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

A

A

B

B

EGERTON ROAD

CA

VE

ND

ISH

RO

AD

Cavendish Court

Malabar

Dressing Room2.1m²

Dressing Room5.4m²

Master Bedroom13.6m²

Ensuite11.0m²

Void AboveEntrance

Ensuite4.8m²

Bedroom12.5m²

Shwr

WC

Bathroom4.6m²

Bedroom16.8m²

Linen

Balcony

Landing

Plot 0294.4m² First Floor GIFA

Master Bedroom13.0m²

FP

Ensuite8.4m²

Dressing Room4.3m²

Living Room16.0m² Bedroom

10.9m²Laundry4.3m²

Bathroom6.1m²

LandingVoid

Plot 0186.7m² First Floor GIFA

+3.200

+3.200

Site Boundary

Site Boundary


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(10) 03

Proposed Second Floor Plan0 10(20)m

Loggia

New TreeProposed

New TreeProposed

RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

RL

23

22

21

20

25

26

27

28

29

30

24

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

22879

A

A

B

B

EGERTON ROAD

CA

VE

ND

ISH

RO

AD

Cavendish Court

Malabar

Plot 01 30.5m² Second Floor GIFA

Plot 02 50.0m² Second Floor GIFA

Bedroom 0220.4m²

Site Boundary

Site Boundary

En suite4.6m²

Void below(Bedroom)

HallwayVentilated Void

Ventilated Void

+6.250

+6.250

+6

.05

0

Ea

ve

s L

eve

l

+6.050


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

N

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(10) 04

Proposed Roof Plan0 10(20)m

New TreeProposed

New TreeProposed

RL

RL

RL

Loggia

RL

RL

EGERTON ROAD

CA

VE

ND

ISH

RO

AD

Cavendish Court

Malabar

Site Boundary

Site Boundary

+6.250

+8

.90

0

45

°

45

°

45°

45

°

1,5°

1,5

°

+9.050 Ridge Level

+8

.80

0

+6.250

+6.050 Eaves Level

+6

.05

0

Ea

ve

s L

eve

l

A

A

B

B


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(11) 02

Proposed Street Elevations 1 of 2

Proposed West Street Elevation

Proposed South Street Elevation

0 10(20)m

*

45.51

44.15

43.12

41.45

42.82

41.45

42.82

41.45

50.3849.99

50.38

46.00

43.12

45.89

40.5040.65

45.45

44.31

45.50

44.13

44.02

48.11

47.00

48.09

46.98

48.10

46.91

48.67

47.7248.12

46.93

48.10

47.00

48.11

47.01

45.44

44.29

45.43

44.29

45.42

44.13

45.42

44.13

43.16

41.64

42.85

41.62

42.8342.83

42.84

45.51

42.82

41.60

41.47

42.84

44.15

39.00 AOD

41.00 AOD

43.00 AOD

45.00 AOD

47.00 AOD

49.00 AOD

49.90 AOD

47.25 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

Street level varies

6.25 PH

8.80 PH

41.00= 0.00 GFL

47.25

42.83

42.61

40.19

47.86

47.23

45.78

44.14

43.61

42.62

44.13

45.30

44.10

40.2440.22

42.2942.65

41.19

40.31 40.32

42.31

43.72

39.00 AOD

41.00 AOD

43.00 AOD

45.00 AOD

47.00 AOD

49.00 AOD

50.50 AOD

47.25 AOD

43.20 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

Street level varies

9.050 PH Ridge Level

6.25 PH

41.00= 0.00 GFL


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

MZ TF 01.02.2016 A GA(11) 04

Proposed Internal Garden Elevations

Proposed East Elevation Viewed Within Garden Proposed North Elevation Viewed Within Garden

Proposed West Elevation Viewed Within Garden Proposed South Elevation / Part Section Viewed Within Garden

0 10(20)m

49.90 AOD

47.25 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

Ground level to adjoining property varies

EtchedWindow

6.20 PH


8.90 PH

41.00= 0.00 GFL

47.25 AOD

49.90 AOD50.50 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

8.80 PH 8.90 PH 9.05 PH

41.00 AOD = 0.00 GFL

39.00 AOD

41.00 AOD

43.00 AOD

45.00 AOD

47.00 AOD

49.00 AOD

50.50 AOD

47.25 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

Street level varies41.00= 0.00 GFL


6.25 PH 6.050 EH

49.90 AOD

47.25 AOD

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry


6.25 PH

8.90 PH

41.00= 0.00 GFL


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

A GA(12) 01

Proposed Section AA

MZ TF 01.02.2016

0 10(20)m

Outdoor Patio

Dining

Living Room Bathroom

Outdoor Patio

Larder Kitchen

Bedroom

Laundry

2.90 PH

6.25 PH

site

bo

un

da

ry

41.00= 0.00 GFL

site

bo

un

da

ry

8.90 PH

-2.85 FL-3.15 FL

-0.30 FL

45°

1.5°

Gym

8.80 PH

6.050 PH


Client's name

Scale:


Job title

Drawing title

Planning1310


T +44 (0)20 8546 1640




*

1 : 100 @ A1; (1: 200 @ A3)

A GA(12) 02

Proposed Section BB

MZ TF 01.02.2016

0 10(20)m

site

bo

un

da

ry

site

bo

un

da

ry

2.90 PH

6.25 PH

41.00= 0.00 GFL

-2.85 FL

8.80 PH9.050 PH

-3.15 FL

-0.30 FL

45°

Gym

Dining Area Kitchen Larder WC

Ensuite Gym BathroomHallwayHallway

Hallway Garage

Dressing RoomHallwayHallwayBathroom LaundryMaster Bedroom

6.050 PH

Application No: Application Type: FULLmygov.elmbridge.gov.uk/documents/s9981/20160813... · • Disruption during construction. One letter of support was also received. The application

Documents