Top Banner
Apple vs HTC Patent Violation Case Manju A. Thomas Ist Year MBA-DMS
9

Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

Dec 05, 2014

Download

Business

Manju Thomas

A case study on patents
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

Apple vs HTC

Patent Violation Case

Manju A. ThomasIst Year MBA-DMS

Page 2: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

 PATENT #5,946,647

a patent that was issued all the way back in 1999 for Apple.

“data tapping patent” The method used by which your phone

can automatically "see" an address or phone number on a web page or e-mail and send you to the appropriate app.

Page 3: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study
Page 4: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

THE CULPRIT

HTC, a Taiwanese phone manufacturer uses this technique patented to Apple, in number of its devices.

Page 5: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

Complaint filed by Apple Inc, on Apr. 6, 2010 with the U.S. International Trade

Commission.

Page 6: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION The United States International Trade

Commission is an independent federal agency that, among other things, adjudicates cases involving imports that allegedly infringe intellectual property rights." It has the power, in rare cases, to ban infringing products from the country entirely. 

Page 7: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

VERDICT ON DEC 2011

The ITC ruled that HTC infringed on a patent related to "data tapping" that occurs at the system level in android.

A violation of section 337 of Tariff Act of 1930

Banned the importation and sales of HTC devices having this technique, starting April 19th, 2012.

Page 8: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

WHAT HTC HAD TO SAY?

“While disappointed that a finding of violation was still found on two claims of the ‘647 patent, we are well prepared for this decision, and our designers have created alternate solutions for the ‘647 patent.”

Page 9: Apple vs HTC- a business law case study

No wonder their tagline says,