APPENDIX G Slug Test Results - Records Collections

APPENDIX GSlug Test Results

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1

Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:

Rc=

From type curve:Where Le/rw=

50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet

30ln(Re/rw)=

Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:

rw=

A=2.6098 B=

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

ttfXiixwv ff- tvtmtMsuRiftJS'u tiiis ''' '' ll llllilPil illtSI I-l l:Bouwer and Rice Method

Regression line: r squared = 0.9941

Hydraulic conductivity = 41.08 ft/day

Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________4.5 feet

. ,; ; ..-. .;. .;.'. ; . ,;. .; ; •.;.;.; •.;,; ;., ; y>:.vv .v ,., ••• •;•:>.•;•:•:•:•;•.•:•'•;•:•:• •:•: : > ]';•.•;•:';';•:':•;•'':•:•;•;•: , ,... •••.• •••'•• ;• •:•,•' ••, *t: • • • . • . < • . « • •»:•' •,. •'•*'• •*•"*• •;•' •• • • '• '."t'-j1-1' •• '•• ':'-'-'- • • • •'•'• • • : •'• ;' •'• '•;• • •,•'« • •'•'• ••••; • • ' ' • '• -'•''•• ••••'• '••••.•.'. . , .•'•. .',;.•. : •. .•. . ,•,•.•. •.'.•- ,•.'.' , .•, . ,',•,•.'. -..•;; >:•.>.>. ,':::i::: :mm:mmm mx10

1

ST3au53£ "-1ubOedS 0.01

0.001 cm

*te°° 8 ^^ -.

0

B data

1

* "" J3"~ B

^ ^

J

Time (min)points regression

iH"--- B

B

1 IS

line

ftR3QUl3l

</) Qfli IH l!

fl3 0 >Ôc "E

(133dO QV3H NI HONVHD

oo

cC

P

P<•HP

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1

• •:•••' ::!llii::::!;?ll|£ilf|flllli


Rc=



30ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.6098 B=

^ ^ ^ ^ ff MvMK i

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4


Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________4.5 feet

•'.•'• '•jft. .''•:•;•!•.•: . .• •'•i* •;•: 'v, •,•*,•.•»*' :•:• •'• ;• • •,•,«,, •. ,•: ;

10

iF

"S

<u00CO

0.00102 0.4 _0.6 , . . 0.8 1 \2 1.4Time (mm)

a data points _ regression line

CM

*- 1W QQ) I

H ±

c cw o? 2

T

(XH3d) QV3H MI 3ONVHD

«0en

>n

0P

P*

P0c•<H-P

ino

«n H in o inT-3 o o

\

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1

!;$:?;!:fS


Rc=


S S®»;:;;:;;:;-;:;g:;;


30ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.6098 B=

ilitl$:S; ^

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

Regression line: r squared

Hydraulic conductivity =

_ Effective radial distance• of slug test =

MSSSS lJ' otilS Si ' ^B&i'SSSS:'® ^

Bouwer and Rice Method0.9972

37.48 ft/day

4.5 feet

0.001ISTime (mm)

B data points _ regression line

AR30M35

4- Iwo>

CD *-*.£ css O

(133d) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1


Rc=



30ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.6098 B=

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =

Hydraulic conductivity = . 52.71 ft/day


10

CD1

ubflaa 0.16

0.0102 0.4 _. , 0.6. . 0 . 8 1 12Time (mm)

H data points _ regression line

RR30U13-7

* *-

<DI •_D) 4-1.EC= Oec SLL

a

c(2C/

(133d) QV3H MI 39MVH3

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-8


Rc=


59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9964 B=

8s;.K®s::;ss! ; S> ^;??:";SfffX}! S W!l:

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

:;:i$|:;l



^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =


241 .05 ft/day

5.0 feet

0.0010.4 _. f 0.6. N 0.8 1 12Time (mm)

data points _ regression line

AR30M39

0PCO - *

«- I$ w•o "55

(X33d) QV3H MI 3OMVHD

inc-i

:

a Ic c

inC3

in co »n T—i in o in<N rJ o CJ

I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-8

vxMtwVmmwmmmmmTotal well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:

Rc=

From type curve:Where l_e/rw=

59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9964 B=

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared



10

«X— '1§<uffic o-1**m

D60Ca6 0.01 '

0.001 c•

\\B

\ G3

• B \ B (9 1

\i B a B a i

B

OJ

a data

1 B D

SB B B

1 B !

B B B] 8

rri- / 1.5. \ 3Time (mm)points regression1 w1

I

1 i

2^ 3

line

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-8


Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9964 B=

i ill iRZ PII ti ill l ffi

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45



^ Effective radial distance^ fc of slug test =


120.90 ft/day

5.0 feet

. • . • , , , : , I-:,'1 . '.''/:•', /.': ,' vX'.v. . ,•:•'•:•.''•'•: :•:•:•;•:•;•'•'•'•:•;•; :•; ;•:•;•;'' ••: ;•:•; ; ;•• : •;• • • ;•:•:•: :•;•; :•»;•:•:•;•, vx;vX !»'v' : '•'•.•'-' • •• ;•'•; •• x-x-r*:'\-«M- •••• , •/ 'v;*V':'' ',','', ;•:•: . ••• '•'•; • ; '•••,'.•!•'''• • •: '•••;• • ; • ' '•;•;• ' ';•;•' ,•'•'•' : ; ' • ' ' '•• •> ; !•'•' • • ' ••'.•.;,; .,..-.,..... _= . . ;,;••• ;;;;"";

10

g '.•oea<Dffi.s "-1OJbt)ca

^ 0.01

0.001 (ft

,1 \

3 fy

TB

\

B 1

IB 13 B B

1 B B

B 8 B 1

TiB data points

B B B B B [

1

me (min)regi

i i ii 3

23 3 3

•ession line

5

AR3GMU3

•*— •W COO J

•o "55

CD

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3

RR30UUU

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9964 B=

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




10

T3eaoffi.£<uGO

o.01

0.001O S 1 _ . . I S . . 2 2 STime (mm)


ftR30Ul»*S

CM* 004- |w rn,23"S

I?OO) 4->.E c= O

(1333) QV3H NI3OMVHO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


';'•.': '.:•;-:? :*i:£;:&J:Vj:$ iff' f-SffflSUKSffffi' :•;•<; f:f •'•:•':•'?, •f- .'fWWffft ¥.:¥.:':; iiSJSSiSSr


Rc=


& S*SSiS*SSSi:*K?®!S?iK?SSSSaB(bI!ia4WW$*M<9mffM3miWfM

83.02 feet10.83 feet

10 feet100 feet0.1 3 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.1780 B=

SiKSS itSSSSSS:::-:; ^ ^¥Ki¥ii¥:¥jf¥SBB:¥5/¥ -1 i;:i¥5;¥<fto

2 inches6 inches

72.19 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

••t J i ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ f



_ Effective radial distance^ Bi of slug test =


195. 12 ft/day

6.0 feet

—

10

s~^ is•OCd<UDCc o-1

•f"N

8)§ •6 0.01

0.001 (

A

V

B

B

I

I

B\

\N

) 0.1 J.

B data poin* / • \ °ime (mm)ts regres

B

3 0.4 0.5

sion line

flR30l*U7

CLHEI) oven NI HONVHD

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


''•'• :;:|:r* :J: ;:|:;:>;: :;:|:|:|:[:|:f;::|x;;ij:|:;j:;:;:|:;;;::


Rc=



10 feet100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.1780 B=

:;:|:;:::;;;:!:::;:f:

2 inches6 inches

72.19 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared



•;Jf!£lll

10

i

&"Oaffi

u60cd

^ 0.01

0.001 (

tI 4

B

1 " %

!9 B I

B B B B B B B 1D B B B B B

1 0.5 _1. , . N 1^ 2 2^Time (mm)JM| B data points regression line

CM

to eg0) -J

51c'.E.<2DC

c.E o

CL333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

RR30**150

0>

CD

.EC= oCOLL

i

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3AR3QM51

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test # 2Monitor Well US-9

1 ':?:v v fiO'.;;:,;.'"':;-.!}''. ' . i.?^ SiJetsifi tibnsi lf f lH j iij: ::, :1::,, •; :;•:"•/• ' -•-,- ••- •.•/..


Rc=




40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.1780 B=

2 inches6 inches

72.19 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

;: •- ' : .' ;; ;J\V ;:|':t •'•• ;i:, ' M Jr -^--' '-- ------- : - '- ;



Effective radial distanceof slug test =


793.91 ft/day

6.0 feet

• :' I- -.>'•:•'<."'•• . • //' '•r:r;;:;':<:;;::';';:';;:;''<jrapliicar:ResiiIts "••' "'.':. .„.•'!...•. •.'..:•• . - ..10 •

g \•acd<uDCCH

(30cCO

^ 0.01

0.0010

a f a iT

1 S B » « «. 13 B a B S B 1] H B H B H 13 1

OS 1 —. . IS. N 2 2J 3Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

152

I


SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


• • ••:••:-- •:=? • ••• ••. •• ' ^ ? m WdCl;.Si cM«S :l': : • ." -v >.;,,., ; f / • ' . -


Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches

51 .27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




''-lOiv' ' 'l-'U K»e:ti ] i'C •,•••••.•! '•''•"': ' •'•':•.;'', K-'1'1' ' '• ' ••::: ;; '' :.:' :> .......'..


231 .97 ft/day

5.0 feet

:;: "•-'•••••• -.'.... '''V;::';'::"^^ ":;;-:-: ••• ' • . .. .

10

g J•oCBuffi.5 0-1ubOcdu OJ)1

0X101 (

1ni BI B1 BI m g Q

)

i o o n n ——

a i

—— a —— D n i

1 B B

TiB data points

B a

me (min) 'repr

!3

IS 3 3.5

•ession line

&R30U15U

(1333) QV3H MI 39MVH3

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


, "• : • •: ' • , " ,.••,,•••; '•'; .''!.: •.;';!•••,., '•:•: , '•; .•: ' :•'• !•'•:•'• •.•*w r ' ' '» ' ' t . •'••••' ' ' *.•»•; ;•""!'•"- •' • " • •'" . '•••:•:': •'•... . . . . . . . . . . - - - - . - - - - - -• • - •••••••• ,• m ^ m m , •• •-•• •• ---—•—•• • ••••••• • •- ••Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches

51 .27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

ResultsBouwer and Rice Method

Regression line: r squared = 0.8366


Effective radial distance____of slug test = __ ______5.0 feet

Graphical Results

-8-B

B i!

0.001r~ , . ,Time (mm)


2 2S 3 3S

S°

c c«!tt2

CO CN

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHDftR3QM57

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-10

; :"':*:: \Pi; .;.;. ... 'i-lt j:;;:|;:|.: •, - -- :.- v..: ,:u :;,,,,;::-,-:",:::: :-;•; • TVZV


Rc~



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches

51 .27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

•• • " . ': >fi::;' •',,'•. ':: ^ ^ EW » > ^ 1 : '-•-•-•••- •'-Bouwer and Rice Method




0.7591

206.08

5.0

ft/day

feet

'Res'nlis

0.0011 —IS .... 2 2S 3 3STime (mm)


£ -•o -5

.E c= oCO 5LL

inCO

ino


AR30M59

«n

.n

GO

3

ino

0)

tco •>o 5O) •*-•.E c= o(0 5LL


in

(.

CPcC<hC

inO

m (si m en^ I CN I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2696 B=

I ^ IS If SI ; ^

2 inches6 inches

81 .66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




10

1 i

sg »-iffi,C

8) 0.01ed6

0.001

0.00010

m

1a.8*B

8B

1 1

1

B 8 B 1

T!„ data points

5 , . :me (mm)regr

2S 3 3S

ession line

HR30M61

CO CM T-<

(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHO

in

cP•<Ht

ino

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


89.75 feet8.09 feet10 feet100 feet

0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2696 B=

2 inches6 inches

81. 66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

"::i::i:::*f;Regression line: r squared




308.76 ft/day

6.6 feet

• ,• , ..,'.•. ,•,',•,,. . . .,.,. ,.;,'.;.; >,./.;; ', '.•'.•'.•' ',•'• '.>' . ,'X x-iv" ,-XvX-: •:•:•.-;-:•'•. •.>•:•;•!•:•;•;•'•:•'•: xvx-xox'-rvy-rvX''' ^ ':'' "•'•:•;•'•:•;;«•:•:•:•:•: :•:•••: i*X')» ' ••'•'•:•••••,• '•'•*'iii'i:j •' !•'' •: 'i'X'X'X X1 :':•:••;•:•; x>yv;'' ;•:'•:•,' ;;••,, .•;•'•' "•' • v/vX'X'Xv.v1' •' •]''• '•; '. .'!•:• -:1:1.1 •;-. M'XvM'.'i'i'XvJv.'Wii'X1

10

0

1

<£T3

ffiCu60 0.01

ed6

0.001

0.0001 (

L_J1 B B

fB 1

±_

B B

B B B 1

53 ea

9 EH B I

B3 C

B B B

3 I3

I 0^ 1 _. , IS. s 2 2.5 3Time (mm)m B data points _ regression line

6R30M63

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


';;:.'itkS.if: fi>':*MfMiWXtif:'yi«;


Rc=


&S&:£8&;O::::::x>:Xr:::::r::c;:::;::r::::;r-r;:'::::::r:r:::7tt^


0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=

i;:lf g &££$if;g Vf;iS fWmf&•x'V:l$l!' . £.%!':% ^ ^'X;XvXv,;:!:Xv;.vXvX: -:•:•:-:


rw=

A=3.2696 B=

$&£'::X:XW *:wX-X-xU;xW:;X;xW:W ^

2 inches6 inches

81 .66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

ifiiiilffRegression line: r squared


_ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =


342.85 ft/day

6.6 feet

;:x' ::': Kx'ttx::j&:g&:;:&:;

10

T33DC_£Dbocd

0.001

0.0001

Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

+-Cft0•o<0

oD) •*-*.EC= o

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVKD

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ K i &iiii ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^


Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2696 B=

2 inches6 inches

81 .66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45



Effective radial distance_____of slug test =___________6.6 feet

0.0001

B-H D O———B- -B———B-B-

II B B II

Time (min)a data points _ regression line

2 2S 3 3S

AR30M67

CM

*• I10

"

.E == OcoLL

I(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


70 feet13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

•.#:''!:C;



^_^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =


55.99 ft/day

5.2 feet

0.010 0.05 0.1 rrfl.15 , . . 0 0 5 OJ 035TYme (min)

H data points _ regression line

-O 0)

c c•53 oE^

inCO


co

in

/•c/P

<**.s.

0<KP

inC5

CN coI I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

/\—

3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45



^ Effective radial distance^ fe of slug test =


62.65 ft/day

5.2 feet

10

1 Ih

ed<L>E

bOCed

0.01

0.0010.05 0.1 ,-AlS , . . 02 0 5 03 03STime (mm)


(XHHd) OVHH NIHONVHDRB30M72

SLUG TEST ANALYSISFalling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-15

•;.::ii!ll:lll:i:;;:lilllliilillilll


Rc=


iiii ii MSiiiuji70 feet

13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=

i O ^ j'i i S iJrt'tf'''1' ^


rw=

3.0410 B=

mm:mmmmmm®wmmmmmmm

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




• • • • :. v.v:' •:',-, •;'''''X;X';X';v:'XvX::';';:x'i;x;x:,':'xv:':' ':v::X':;:;x]Xv';:',:.v:'X-;:;'x:i'x;:;:':;:;:'>x:x:'':: ' :• : • x- !•:•'•! 'f •'.&,•& o 4ni'ni'S'tf*%l''t' '• mf i 'j*:€?TH ; 1 •"fr-icf V.'Xvitt'Xv1' :;';v,';:x:X'X':vx': x]:':v:;X':';!;'.':-:;:::;:-;';<-X'-';'; : :'Xvr'''/x':-M': ;':•.•:':• x-x-Xv;- :•'•:";': ;•;•:•'•: x-x-x-Xvi-iv;-'- ; :: ;j': ySiS'? ;;; :? ?:g;S:;s; •;K:K:::H:H:;;;:;iiS:W;;:

10

*z-o !cduE.Buboced o.iu

I

0.01 (•

8

, \iB B a a a i1 B B B B I

B

Tt

a data points

1 B B B B !B

5 , . . 1me (mm)reg]

i i i i

25 3 35

'ession line

&R30M73

•O T%CO

inco


CO

in<N

*» S

P

inC5

in -i in 01 in co ino I ^ I CN I coI I I I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well US-15

:p!;|: ii;:iil|ililiillli:llillili


Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

, ''tftti'XiXvX/; ' •'••'•['', !x':;x'::£:x':x': \' [v:;::::;:vi;:*i :•:•:• |i': i£:ig:::;:^ Wlr'*.-::':;^^;:.:-' :;.:::::'::::::''::;'::::::::::::;:

ft:fr:$Sv:v'-x ';::;:!vx>:]:;:>,:>:v::: ::: :''': :'•' '• ,-''.•. ; :•:'•'; ; x-x-X" ."j-'v'v'-'''':-:''':?:-:'-1'

Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared = 0.9561


Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________5.2 feet___

10

¥(0ffi£* 0.1

0 i

C° '

^ 0.01

0.001 (

m

\\. â

I

\

1 S H 0 B B 1

TiB, data points

D B Bl 13 !

me (min)regi

1 ! 1 i i

25 3 3

•ession line

5

AR30M75

CO

co

inCN

CM .. °

/

— I T *H -« T

•O TsCO £CD 3

o>2 I g|| i e

in0

in o in T—i in CN md o I r-3 | ri

I I I

QV3H NIHONVH3

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


; 'f. '? M|; Jllll Ilililli.


Rc=


s i sssssjsss ss sino'Aai'!WM%!™3 yWKWM %iW#:U

40 feet11. 13 feet

10 feet100 feet

0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=

•Sfilii'jjjiiJ&JSli ilifi'<jpCtiJllv«lliv*lIJ>


rw=

A=2.7571 B=

^mtfmmmmwmmmmimtm-vstixyt' mvwwymmrnw-A 'S' '.im

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

Q.2500 feet

2.70.45




10

g l¥£a <"•*Mt

1

6 o.01

0.001 e

m

a TSL

\B

\ 1

s

\B •\ B B\ B !

\

OS ]

a data

B B SIS B

1 S S 1B B B

rr>. /• I-S- \ 2Time (mm)points regression

II:

2.5 3

line

RR30UI77

=•o "5

o>.±;c e

(xaaj) ovan NI HONVHD(\R30l4l78

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Is):Aquifer thickness:

Rc=


vXiX;.;:;.;: ::x;:y:::::::':::::;r :':::x:::'X-:WM«'7s|i: ?KMMii9lmff ^

40 feet11. 13. feet


40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.7571 B=

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

/iiI$i!f:t$?S





40.89 ft/day

3.9 feet

10

ST3es<Uffi.£ "<uMea6 0.01

0.001 cm

V\

\1

. a\ B\ a B i\ B

1B B I

B B B

0.5 1 ry,!TiB data points

BD 8 B S B

1

me(min)regi

1 !: i9

2S 3 3S

•ession line

inco

daaj) OV3H NI BONVHD\80

CO

in

GC

CN

sri

coP

ino

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


•i-f •••:: ft,-:1'; :,': '•• J;-; ;•;;:;,; ,;:;:;:!:S¥;rSx;xSx:.:xi:x::x;::x4x:xi::S••••• ;•••. • '•• x ; '.•: i1:' ':v.v'i vKxiiiliXxxSf SJS'Si JSSSSSS:


Rc=


40 feet11. 13 feet

10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.7571 B=

:'x'::*xtt:$:::'X::'vxX:o;::X:X; :;.-;'/; ::x'x f <:•:•'•:'•<: ,:>:"•:; ;':':V: ;;':?:: ri':vtfigix'Sx'ggxfxW

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

;:r:|;;v::;i#:



^ Effective radial distance^ B of slug test =


37.70 ft/day

3.9 feet

Graphical Results

0.0010.1 02 —Q3 , . s 0.4 OS 0.6 0.7Time (mm)

data points _ regression line

AR30M8I

(1333) QV3H NI 3OMVHQ

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


'•'•'••;'] •'' • X'i'i'i-x tt'i'iv'': ::;r':':i;:?h''''i'i;'':'::x''::x'::'T:i::':-x'xv;


Rc=


40 feet11. 13 feet


40ln(Re/rw)=

l iii iii iiiiii lSI!Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:

rw=

A=2.7571 B=

iSl ^ iPlli i iJii

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

••;:!:'::::,;.'.C:S;:&• , . '• '':•':•', '•;.'.'•:•'•:':•:•/:•' XvX-x '•:•'• •x-XvX'X'X :•: x-x-XvX'X :•:•:•: X'X'XvX'X'X-y'X-x-x*:- -:•:•:•'-.'•>• •:-'-




?:§:;?S;i;?i-JJ:iSjK S SS;•X'X-XvX'X'X':':'?'"'?!^ • •f.W X'X-i'.'X'-X'i'XvXvXvX'X'x; :•: • '•:•'•'•• ••••i;.i':'X ••XvXvXvX .'''X'/:' •'•:•'.'[• ;•;••• '•'•'•J'X'r-r-Xv "•'>'.>' '•'.•'•',•' ',•'•'•'.•'.•'. :•':;•', . ' . ',>,',',<: ,•, ,•;•,•,•.':•'', ' ,'.•;


26.59 ft/day

3.9 feet

'•:-M^

10

* *

£TJau

? -•t-H

UbficdU 0.01

0.0010•

8

fe

' "V,""1

V^ B

\B ,\ B

1

B 1g B

0.5 rr-f / 1 \ IS 2Time (mm)B data noints regression line

AR3QIH83

0T3CO0

roS.E e= o

(133d) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


;:;:!;:i:iPl:lIIPiillil ^


Rc=


90 feet12.2 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=

iisiiie iB iiijiiiifiiiiiiiiiiWell diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:

rw=

A=3.2300 B=

•iSisiPi

2 inches6 inches

77.8 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

: • ' -': •: ,; ' ,:': ' :''iv'v V;;;;;::;::;::;;x;;'v;'x::;::::x::';:;;;:;' v^;1-1' •.••';-:':!:-'-!';'!!;:;:::::;:;:;::':',:.:<v;r;':- ::'x:'v:;:;:':;:':




SSKSSSiSi•x-fx-i-i-x-r'X':':-:-!" ' '* * /'1' X'.vXx. ':X;X,''XxX:X'X !:X:X;X;X ':':X:':X;::/.vXv:yXxXv:;X>y,x,:px./:xXX x.x.x -'Xi'x';-/,':', •>:-,•;-.'.•:•, •:•:-•-,•• -xW.l.:, . ,...;:..:.:,:;:;:;';


273.37 ft/day

6.3 feet

10

&•aCO£c o-1• »•*<u60CK5

6 0.01

0.0010

•

1P%BB

B

19 B B

B B B

B

B B B 1

TiB data points

8

9 B B B 1

5 , . . 2me (mm)regi

ii

1 !1

2 3 3.5

•ession line

inco


co

in(N

ctCS h

4h

ino


SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


•;' " <••< .,'•• V'; /;::,f:;U viS41;;i ^. •:••-;•-. ".::•: .<?:--•• -' •;-•: - .


Res



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2300 B=

2 inches6 inches

77.8 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




feS iMill. ^ !..:;1.1*:":"1''. :':1'.'1 ••^••••+[> •••••.....;.,.. ...-....'. .'.' •. •••••:••••-. • •.:•'.• -. ,', ;•,• 'X'X- '~r~* ~ *TI*'T ' .,,.-. . . ; . . '.'. '•.•' ',;,.. . . ... :•'• . .


282.72 ft/day

6.3 feet

•:. ':.' ''•'•' ^ ::.;•••' :;;:/:\.'':'' ^10

'•&T3as<u£C o-1• I-*

<ubOa6 0.01

OJWl (

\—\

jaii *»

-1

aa

BB i

8

1 B BEl B B

1

OS

B data

B B B B [

1 B

1 B B B B 1

B

i _,. , is, N :Time (mm)points regression

1

1 I

ZS 3

line


&R3QM89

(133d) OV3H MI 3ONVH3

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


•V-Jk


Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9155 B=

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

.:':'-1it;:::!;$;;;



^ Effective radial distance^ B of slug test =

j;:;;:$;gii;:!|!Jj


18.52 ft/day

4.6 feet

•;;::!:-:-:::.;:i:!M

10

;& 'T3ed<L>ffic "-1'i)16 0.01

0.001 e

•

c\>BjEgjg

\B 19 B 1 9 B I

1 2 3 4_. i . . « 7 8 9 10Time (mm)B, data points _ regression line

SR3QM9I

00

T3 0

h.O

c c

(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHD

QO

•*c

Kf

CO

CN

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9155 B=

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Graphical Resalts

10

•aRJDEctsfl

0.01

0.001OS _,. , . x 1 ISTime (mm)

data points __ regression line

eo*T<n co" ="D 0CO >0 1 Oo>±:c c

in -* CO CS rH


in

co

SLUG TEST ANALYSISiFalling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-18

^/ii ilSiHil:;:'::;!?:;:?:!!:!?:!::!!:!


Rc=


x-xv X'X*xiXv: XiX'X*X'Xvx>xiX'X'X'Xi:vx-x>!**'»':.i''!jj:'ii


40ln(Re/rw)=

iiilcfS iiiiifiiiiiiiiiiWell diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:

rw=

A=2.9155 B=

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




10

g '•oe<3<uffi3 o-iubO§

6 0.01 '

0.001(

a

\1

9

\\\i

\B B\ B B

NV B I

TiB data points

3 B S B B B I

\

me (min) 'regi

i i 9 13

> 2S 3 3S

•ession line

RR30M95

"8

.E c= oCO 5u.


SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9155 B=

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




0.0001

II B

OS _1. . . . IS 2 2S'time (min)B, data points _ regression line

RR3QU197

W)

CM

*±"2 0|£^S.E c= oCOLL

CCtc/p.

• • v -« ^- jI I I(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2676 B=

2 inches6 inches

81 .47 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

•:: >; :,;x: |; x ::: •••' ':,.':|:j:;x;;:::.';y::,;:|x|:| ;':;;:;'::':;:':;:;:;;f;;:|;;:!:::;:;:::^




•x'X'X-xvx-x ;•:•:!"« '."£•£. ;''•:• xixv X'X-x-X'X'X-x-x-x-x 'Xvx X'tti-x-x-xv1': ; .-:•: : y-fv'v, :-, :•••' :•:•:•• r.v'-'X-X'Xv ;•:•;•: :•: :•',-•• •;•:•;•;•;•.• •'•, .•:•:•:•:• •••;•;•:': :,•::•,:'";, ,-:•. ;•: y/,-:-,-;Hilppitifc ^Bouwer and Rice Method

0.9999

649.39 ft/day

6.6 feet

10

§ '<•s<Dffi3 "(t>00cCO

6 0.01

0.001 c

A

Y8 !

9 \ B

\\

1 B

B

B

\

\0.05 0.1 —f.

B data points

B B •

15 / • N 0me (mm)regi

9

ra

B

B

2 025 03 03S

ession line

&R30M99

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


• • • '•• '; .-.: ;v': ••'••:'• '•;:,&;;::i::: "" '• :.•:.. : - ;••------ -1 . .: ' • :••••:.••.: vî: :• • • : • i V "' 'S&XtoW '^ • •' '-' ">•'••• •'." • • ' • • • , -- - - - - - - - - - . - - .




40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.2676 B=

2 inches6 inches

81 .47 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

;. - : • ^.v,;:S:-!;n ... .::.---•••• . ..;.... . .:





209.02 ft/day

6.6 feet

10

0.001

Time (mm)data points _ regression line

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=



40ln(Re/rw)=

;::Q»% i J K a::i Trt'W'tt''tt#xW x'12':sw'PPPlJEICo*****!:** ;; ; m«mmmv


rw=

A=3.2676 B=

2 inches6 inches

81 .47 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




0.01

0.001

-*-

0.5 1 _. f 1.5. v 2 2STime (mm)B data points _ regression line

""" O)

*T4-« '

•o "55co >0 >1 o0).1Sc c

CO

in - co

(xaaa) avan NI HONVHO.&R30U202

CO

incs

inc5

CM o,

*-T

tiC C

rH fN) CO -<*© O O OI I I I

(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHD

H- ICO

.EC= oCOLL

I

QVHH NI3ONVHD

CM en*T*•<W CO0 J•o "0f!^- o= 1:= o

avaH NI SONVHD

APPENDIX HIrrigation Well Assessment

H.I Operational Periods of Irrigation Wells

Hastings Irrigation Well

ftR30U208

oS!

CO$0

COCO<

cdOJD

HH

I

£

1m

8

ai

i

ic§ . . . " gE" °-i. saoraaa 10 / NO I

AR30U209

c0ECOCO0CO2 £-

1 1> 03

•i— i

1 -5co .aO) tS•;-; ca*— E

1

cc"gDCO•"•

Si~ .

i i i i i i i i

: •r-> J

M

1

7t-»

$p"

Sii

8

Siis§

i. saoraad aao / NO I

S!

0

COCO

co __* Jo• 1—

C fco •"*MO)-• C3fc ffi

I

s03

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

>->

s

Si"37

s;j.

Si1iTH

73

C 5=O IQ. 0-

aao / NO

v

0coCO0COCO _

IIbfi•—4-1 OJOCO .3O) «•— cct: ffiIE"35

Sii

Si

Si_L3

Co

IE"0

Si

f

Sii

f

Si

Ii

Si

§ "g SCL O.

| saomadaao/NO |

13Q r\ o w • -H

c0ECOCO0COw a

1 o£ gbfic

bfi"to .a05 «••• cdt ffi

1

E"ECO

-

-

-

i i i i i i i i

£ _•i ^HS3 V

cs

CO1

ts

8* [r]tw t-M

3 5-BQ™

SiiA

s?QQ3

1 ! l1 saoraaa aao / NO | M

T————

0

COCO0CO

11^ *3> ed

C

OQ

I

E03CO

Sijr8

I

?

ts9i

_ .._ &COC ^_ IO *^ sex.c J^L

a saomaa aao / NO |

AR30if2l5

4-

0

ECOCO0COCO ^

1 §> •£}^ cd

§ |'43 §0m c*** -i— cO) to•j— cd^ K

1ma m

DC

1

_-

—

-

I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

o13

Si353o

fgQ

S!ig-CO1

N

o

o 'gQ- S.I sdomad aao / NO |

Collins Irrigation Well

SiI

Siic

0CO0 *CO

§tofi

«t cVM

fSI

E

1CO

Sii

I8

Siiec a=o oi" °~i. saoiHHJ aao / NO I

Sii. - •=? ^

C0ECOCO0COCO< *"0 G

bflC TTO £••" &2

CO -S0) 3•c oJ±

1E

1CO

_

—

i i I I i I i i

^ f

SiiIOv-f

w<J mQ ™

Sii8

Siiso % JoE P

c0ECOCO0CO

"0 G> 0> T5cdc -p

AcIs 1.5* *3*— U

1

E"sCO

Sij_»-*

SJI

SiI

SiI

O Sg gQ- 0.

g. sdomadaao/NO |

8?ep

C0ECOCO0CO

"0 G> 0> T3cdc -c1o £'15 02S .sWH F"O) -3"E 3

IE15

3

-

-

-

i i i i i i

t ^

Si

<fS

Si§>

* MQ™

s;137s

s"3

§ S sCL Q_

1 sdoraajaao/No | g

Pc0ECOCO0COCO ^

"0 G^ .2

"cdtofin 'EAc ""*

RPEo -S^ •Wfc **~*

|31E"g3CO

-

-

i i i i i i i i i5 st=0 ^Q. Q.

[^ 1 sdomadaao/NO 1

i.1

i

fS

I

—

0coCO0CO

OJ g'•3cd

O

to .sf s

ce

SJr

WlkCOI

SJ

SQ

$

00

g =§ JQ. Q. NE E

BR30U223

H.2 Monitor Well Hydrographs

Monitor Well LD-1

&R30U227

0

I 78 qCO "-1

.1eo

U. >-H

I i_T*

EE3CO

T

2

ts

(xaaa) aaAai >iaxvM NI

0

I 78 Sco |-JJ*5 =3 ^_______—(—— r< 13 ^ '

"0

CO

3CO

§c 2

o1-1

'

13A31 H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

Si

0

8 SCO J

-J— tcO

c 2

f•c Sl« 00— o

Ui

g

CO

Si38

f m"18!i

SiiIrt O !<•> it </•>O O I ^

I I

NI 30NVH3

&R301423Q

IBO

8

R

•» in <o f^,O O O O r s i

(X33d) 13A31 H3XVAV NI3ONVHD

5R30U231

0COco YCO QCO J

oE 2

.8JSP*

gI

E"gCO

SiI•?Is

s;i

00

Si00

r-l II S

13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHO

flR30l»232

—»——

0

CO?

CO 7 S |

0

co HCO -1

GO

c 2.2 84-i IM

CO 43If• IccgCO

&lJr

Si

&J

13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVHO

t

0

Wco®coco

0> ^5 -ac

GQ

OH

S

DC

3co

I8-enI

9,

i

T8-

c! c! c> o' I1 1 1 !

(X3Hd) 13A3T H31VM NI 3ONVH3

-• ——

0

COco v® Aco Qco J

GO

CMO>

*OOI

S!ii8

jr8

w»

8-o I

a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHD

HR30U23S

Monitor Well LS-2

ftR3Ql»236

~I

0

COCO0COCO

G

€O)l_ Ui^ toO- 8

T3

HH

DC

g3CO

O _

1^^

8

Sii

Sii

S!ic

o o o oI I I I

13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

0COCO0COCO

1 1> Goc 2

CO 43O) P*•B »•.

— OI *inHH3CO

(XH3H) 13A31H3XVAV NI HONVHD

3QU238

0

3

Sii

Sii

"1(NT

Si

O' O C> c! O° C> C> C> OI I I I I I I I

13A31 H3XVAV NI 30NVHO

flR30U239

_£3co

oIco 78 2co d< o

0

CtgO)

i IHH*

SiI

8!

Cl33d) a3A31 H3XVM. NI 3ONVHO

0COSR <*0 iCO co

03CO

= I0 t.GO

WJ CLttmm ZT1v. F5

-PKM

Si

a

Sieo

NO\

SP

S!

(xaaa) asAai naxvM NI

0

COCO0COCO

— oI tffi1co

^>^

<L>

"0 g> "GoCO— ^ ^CO 43

*

f f ? ? f f f f f(xaaa) 13A3T HaxvM NI

No,

en1

8-en

i?

I

(X33d) a3AHT miVAV NI 3ONVHD

— • ———

0

I 7% 3CO d

1§cCO -G

.? s

g3CO

(N9t

oIS

siJr

(xaaa) aaAai naxvM NI

Monitor Well LS-3

NI 3ONVHO

0COCOG >s > sg - _V ?

o

0 gGO

= 2O t-43ed

HH

cc"gco

•

Sii

Siicf*4 f<> •«*• l* v t . oo Oi«> o o o' o «> o o'I I I I I I I I

13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHD

13A31H3XVAY NI 39NVH3

c0)

CO

COCO<

£3CO

iu i i 1 ^ 1 i i i.o

OuI U

E . 1 g^

Si

iTj-

g2?

(X333) a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

0COCO0COCO

0 SGO

COB

II fr_g

CO

Ol

?m

VI

8-enI

oo

Si00•3

o o o o o o o o oI I I I I I I I I

(X33d) THA31H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

0COCO <?0 ICO cqCO ^*ls-<2• I—IGo

c 2o ^tW o•I

0CO

P _7 T

Cl

f

?CO

en

8-en

(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHO

0wCO®COCO

3

(-12g

cCO -*•i5 2t &JO

"

I

as

a

(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

RR30U253

Monitor Well LS-8

0COw °°% J,CO ico ~< ?"0 o> •-5 §c 2o *

o

g3CO

Sic

Sii

4c> c> o' c> c> c> c>I I I I I I I

(X333) 13A31 H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

(X333) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

ell Assessment

tor Well LS-8

- rrgn

Hydrograph for M

aure

!/•>C>

Si

Sia

1

(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

ftR30U257

0

COW o oICO <«CO J

33

0CO

c 2.2 g"CO 43

1 £

g3CO

gI00

<s

g

gi3

o'I

13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

sp

c0

CO ooCO i0 coW a<

«

23CO

—— feJD0 .S

2

gi1

2P

00

??

(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

0CO opCO I0 coCO "J

Coco £O 43

..V i-<

O

DC

3CO

•8-ento

<

t

t8 igk

g

(XH3d) 13A3T HSXVAi NI3ONVHD

W

Laurel Rl - Irrig

m Well Assessment

^Hydrograph for Mo

nitoring Well LS-8

i

(<

I{(s

s

" ^

__ s

y

•> o m «-< v> & T-

1 1

(X333) 13A3T aXVM NI 3ONVH3

NOl

8-n8

S

t«0-H

P3If«\8-mCOi-(

Si8-m

> 1«3

AR301426

0

COCO oo0 ICO coCO -)

IGO2

<« 43———^ VMMf

O) O,•"» cd

1CO

8

I8

<êAfcl

S!

eno I

(X333) 13A3T HSLLVM NI 3ONVH3

Monitor Well LS-12

AR30U263

—•——

0CO <s>CO rH0 ICO coCO J

g3CO

GO

S sP M

43§* <I

gjLiS

g

gC S O M • * V C o o ^ - io o o o o I ;3

I I I I

(X33d) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 39NVHD

a:"gCO

gi

—1

0E0 ICO co

S <2® -C!O) a,'= 2

g

IO

g

g

f

(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

g

c0

I a0 ICO co

0 u

MG

= I0 1

•c f

M-i

g

3CO

gi3i

gi

gI

gI3

o' o o' o' II I I I


0

i a0 iCO coCO J

=O

IE

3CO


gI

g

s

g00

g

0COCO0CO

K

o•s*.

oO) .— DH!• tf^ t-l

2

03

g

7

g

Is

is

N

T

gI

(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

0

I 20 ICO co

GO

C 5

•i 1

ffiHM

1(0

jr8

gCO

8

(X33d) 13AHT mXVAV NI 3ONVHO

"I

0

i 20) ICO v>

G

= I0!^ M 1——Ô} Cu

"" O1 1CC

CO

^c

5<r>

^<c<

^- — — •

?

>

>' c! o' ^ c> o c> cJ o c1 1

8-en1f>T-I

1O,Oco

> S

A (X333) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

vi

itm«e

RR304270

T

0

CO

0

G

= IO ~co 2• ••I ZtrfW C3

t!_ ffi££

i

II

tsT

SQ

cs o Io' 2


Monitor Well LS-14

0CO .0 T -^^CO co

flgG

Oc s°S<4—(43

g

3CO

tt-Mg

g3s

(S tr> <<h inc> o c! oI I I I

(X33d) 13AHT H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

^ —

0

I s0 ICO co

Co

t *-<* tsfi

I

—cc13CO

g3

gi

g18

gi

f

(X333) 13A3T HaLVM NI 3ONVH3

c0

i s0 iCO co

0

G

c %

o

Ih-Hg

3CO

Ia

o\I

g

gO CS •* •*> W i-l

o' c! c> <£ II I I I

(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

g

0COCO0COCO

-»oc so tB fftHH

3CO

gI<

gI

gj3I-VI

g

^ "2 "to o oI I I


0COco 2;0

o.aGo

•ia» -aIEg3CO

gLIa

gooI

a

g00 wH

gi

g

(X33H) a3A3T H3XVAV NI3ONVHD

0CO rf^ % 801 * §CO coCO J

kco - <^ '

^^ GoI?J J ^ /ffl sO) di•— cd>— 6A

g

CO

o>

Jr

oI

g

Jra

gi


(X33i> 13A31H3XVAV NI3ONVHO

RR30U279

0CO TfCO S ^ '0 ICO coCO J< *

G ^ Si

CO

O2

1O) PH'•- cd— O

•I

<$8

COI

(X33d) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVHO

RR30U280

Monitor Well LS-16

AR30U28I

(X33d) 13A3T miVM. NI 3ONVHD

0

co 50 iCO co5 = i0 g

GO

J™ bflS

I *°I ^ fc

g

CO

gIo

g

I2

gI

t-l CS C^> •**• IO ^^ f~ CO O* - r n lo o' tf o <S <S o' o' o' ISI I I I I I 1 I I


S!

C0

CO V£CO n0 ICO coCO J^ T5

sGO

S 20

O)

EDC"g3

gia

g

g

g3

*-t &t ef) •** \f> )& C-» ooo o o o o o o oI I I I I I I I


(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 39NVH3

g

0

COCO £0 7w nCO 3< d

Gc £

t 2mm b£

OI *o

g

1

g

IS

gI? "3

g

f

g

1 S


A-R30l*286

0

COCO0COCO

5O

S S.Q **"5 43CD DH•«•• cdk_i u<" toJD•" O

'I

e < a

|co

Ot

Jr

§

g00

a

inf

(X333) a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

0£ veCO rH0 ICO coCO J< a

.53

Ig3CO

G

I

8-en8

enIOO

as-

tf> \& t~c> <5 o"I I I

(X333) a3A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

cso\I

0

COCO

coCO H-3<

fO) a,•!•• cd

"I1 I

£3CO

as

en

a

v>

8-encs I> °0

13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO

Monitor Well LS-17

AR30i*29Q

g

^

0CO ^CO S0 ICO coil0

GO

g3CO

*

oS-i

g

gc3

g

gIc

(XHHH) q3A3T HBXVAV NI SONVHO

RR30U29I

0S oV) rH0 Ito v>W j

feO

.53O""5

IHHDC

CO

(X333) a3A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

g

g

PQIgi

i8

0CO ^CO 50 ICO co

0

GO

C

0 I

?™ ui feo

I

E

1CO

\>

gI2

g

8

gI

g37

oI


<u

0 u.-4-J• -tGO

O t5'•S OT3 <£5

IT!MHcc£3CO

0

CO ^to ^ \ i0 I * 8CO coCO J

g

g3

gI<

gIi—v

I

g

(X33d) 13A31H3XVM NI HONVHD

0COCO £0 7C/5 'to 3< a13

50.aG

C

i!MHDC

"03

g

a

g

g§°

(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 39NVH3

i?r-« I

1 §

AR30I4295

0CO ^CO £;0 ICO coCO J

CD

Go5-to

oUi

IH-lDC

3CO

I8 g

O5

• 8-en

CN

I

afa

gi

i

(X33d) 13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3

< a

g3CO

fCi

8-enIOO

enI

Ien

<f> o <-•> r-i 1 1 CN Io o- I Y ' 8


0

if130

» f£ §>

'IHMg

3CO

a

is

P-lO>I

O>

JrI

(X33d) 13A3133XVM NI3ONVHD

RR30U298

Monitor Well LS-19

AR3Q14299

(X33d) 13A3T miVAV NI 3ONVHO

RR'30U30tt

052coOCOCO

GO

c 20

3CO

3••^ ^^f I1IBM OJQ

g

i1/1 I

7*

(X333) aSA31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

g

0

CO asCO 1-10 ICO cqCO J

GO

__ .G°* &•-- cd

HH

£3CO

gJ[3cI

gJ3i—»I

CN o CN TJ- \e> oo Tc> o o o o I

I I I I

(X333) 13A31 H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

A.R304302

g

0CO oxCO TH0 ICO coCO J

0

co

o• I—IGO

oS-i

IHH

g

3CO

gepf w

g±3i-»

I

gr-l rf> -* 10o o' o o'I I I I


fl-R30l*303


(X33d) 13A3T H3XVM NI39NVHD

RR3QI+305


AR3QU306

(X333) a3A31 H3XVM MI 3ONVH3 A

APPENDIX I

Meteorological Data for 17 June 1992

AR3Ql*3Q8

SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL - LAUREL LANDFILLMETEOROLOGICAL DATA

17 JUNE 1992

SOUTH

EAST

C NORTH

WEST

| SOUTH

EAST

NORTH i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930TIME [EOT]

100

80

UJS- 60

40

20

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

20

1816

10 ffi

6

4

900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930

TIME [EOT]

^ SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL. - LAUREL LANDFILL• WIND ROSE^ 17 JUNE 1992

HOUR 0900 - HOUR 2000 [EOT]

'

' ' ' —— ' —— 1 —— I —— |1 3 6 10 16 21 93SCALE (MPH)

WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT OCCURRENCE1-3 3-6 6-10 10-16 16-21 >21

N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NNE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00E 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ESE 1.53 18.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00[E 1.53 48.85 13.74 0.00 0.00 0.00^ KE 0.76 4.58 8.40 0.00 0.00 0.00

"kr --*- ~ ~ ~

V

WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT OCCURRENCE1-3 3-5 6-10 10-16 16-21 >21

S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

AR-30I+3IO

APPENDIX J

Soil Gas Screening Results

AR3QUH

Initial Soil Gas Survey Results

AR30UI2

Summary of Soil Gas Survey

Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGrid AR06-LGA

SampleLocationAR06-LGA-01AR06-LGA-02AR06-LGA-03AR06-LGA-04AR06-LGA-05AR06-LGA-06AR06-LGA-07AR06-LGA-08AR06-LGA-09AR06-LGA-10AR06-LGA-11AR06-LGA-12AR06-LGA-13AR06-LGA-14AR06-LGA-15AR06-LGA-16AR06-LGA-17AR06-LGA-18AR06-LGA-19AR06-LGA-20AR06-LGA-21AR06-LGA-22

Date17-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane5.048.55.80.00.00.053.34.40.00.02.18.050.61.611.86.11.643.30.012.03.020.5

Carbon Dioxide5.041.76.03.05.00.029.15.20.99.63.510.341.44.816.98.313.823.33.617.18.323.5

Oxygen16.04.516.9

. 18.617.521.42.518.020.012.27.912.23.114.39.715.68.87.818.69.115.57.4

Summary of Soil Gas Survey(cont'd)

Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGridAR07-LGA

SampleLocationAR07-LGA-01AR07-LGA-02AR07-LGA-03AR07-LGA-04AR07-LGA-05AR07-LGA-06AR07-LGA-07AR07-LGA-08AR07-LGA-09AR07-LGA-10AR07-LGA-11AR07-LGA-12AR07-LGA-13AR07-LGA-14AR07-LGA-15AR07-LGA-16AR07-LGA-16(Duplicate)AR07-LGA-17AR07-LGA-18AR07-LGA-19AR07-LGA-20AR07-LGA-21AR07-LGA-22AR07-LGA-23AR07-LGA-24

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane

0.30.820.730.19.64.80.015.111.111.915.80.00.042.50.064.753.6

0.00.058.81.851.452.362.351.9

Carbon Dioxide4.40.810.612.58.44.30.910.49.49.420.40.52.130.86.622.916.9

1.52.833.02.839.740.320.717.7

Oxygen14.219.713.5-10.613.917.220.614.516.013.89.920.619.66.815.98.25.3

19.218.83.619.63.23.04.96.4


Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGridAR08-LGA

SampleLocationAR08-LGA-01AR08-LGA-02AR08-LGA-03AR08-LGA-04AR08-LGA-05AR08-LGA-06AR08-LGA-07AR08-LGA-08AR08-LGA-09AR08-LGA-10AR08-LGA-11AR08-LGA-12AR08-LGA-13AR08-LGA-14AR08-LGA-15AR08-LGA-16AR08-LGA-17AR08-LGA-18AR08-LGA-19AR08-LGA-20AR08-LGA-21(Inside Well LS-1)

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.00.156.356.20.513.254.30.00.50.00.052.50.00.00.00.00.016.641.624.3

Carbon Dioxide0.12.50.736.534.03.210.042.61.1

, 1.74.23.341.70.70.40.91.60.613.228.518.4

Oxygen20.818.320.02.42.518.911.63.119.719.817.518.02.520.519.819.520.020.710.96.812.2

AR3Ql43i5


Results from Survey of Landfill GasesPerimeter Locations

SampleLocationAR09-LGA-01AR09-LGA-02AR09-LGA-03AR09-LGA-04AR09-LGA-05AR09-LGA-06

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.20.80.00.00.0

Carbon Dioxide1.38.50.80.62.02.4

Oxygen19.715.420.220.519.219.0

AR30U.3I6

•Supplemental Soil Gas Survey Results

AR30U3I7

Summary of Supplemental Soil Gas Monitoring

K Samples Taken Outside Landfill Perimeter

impleLocation

AR-P-LGA-01AR-P-LGA-02AR-P-LGA-03AR-P-LGA-04AR-P-LGA-05AR-P-LGA-06AR-P-LGA-07AR-P-LGA-08AR-P-LGA-09AR-P-LGA-10AR-P-LGA-11AR-P-LGA-12AR-P-LGA-13AR-P-LGA-14AR-P-LGA-15AR-P-LGA-16

^ AR-P-LGA-17^B AR-P-LGA-18^ AR-P-LGA-19

AR-P-LGA-20AR-P-LGA-21AR-P-LGA-22AR-P-LGA-23AR-P-LGA-24AR-P-LGA-25AR-P-LGA-26AR-P-LGA-27AR-P-LGA-28AR-P-LGA-29AR-P-LGA-30AR-P-LGA-31AR-P-LGA-32AR-P-LGA-33AR-P-LGA-34AR-P-LGA-35AR-P-LGA-36AR-P-LGA-37

l ^ AR-P-LGA-38Ik AR-P-LGA-39^ AR-P-LGA-40I AR-P-LGA-41

Date28-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329 -Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329 -Apr- 9329 -Apr-93

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

Carbon Dioxide | Oxygen0.10.40.40.41.01.10.40.30.40.10.20.21.00.30.20.81.10.82.80.30.30.30.30.20.20.11.10.40.40.30.10.20.20.30.80.80.70.31.50.51.6

19.920.020.220.319.519.119.920.019.820.020.220.219.619.819.919.619.519.617.819.619.819.919.920.019.920.019.319.919.919.920.020.120.120.119.619.619.820.018.719.817.3

AR30U3I8BASLRES1A.WK3

APPENDIX G Slug Test Results - Records Collections

Documents