Draft Wetland Delineation Report South Suburban Airport Master Plan Area ID Total Depth Hydric Soil Native FQI Comments W02NE-1-S1 21 Yes W02NE-1U-S2 21 No W02NE-4abc NA NA 9.0 W02NE-5-S1 21 Yes Photo S W02NE-5U-S2 20 No W02NE-6-S2 NA Na no soil core W02NE-6U-S1 20 Yes W02NE-7 NA NA 6.9 W02NW-2-S2 13 Yes W02NW-2U-S1 20 No W02NW-2U-S3 20 No W02NW-5-S1 9 Yes W02NW-5U-S2 18 No W02NW-6-S1 21 Yes W02NW-6U-S2 20 Yes corn field W02NW-7-S2 20 Yes W02NW-7U-S1 21 No UW02NW-8 NA NA NA Photo SE W02NW-9-S1 20 Yes W02NW-9U-S2 21 Yes W02SE-2 NA NA NA No data form, excavated pond W02SE-4-S1 20 Yes W02SE-4U-S2 21 Yes W02SE-5-S1 20 Yes W02SE-5U-S2 21 Yes UW02SE-6 NA NA NA Photo N W02SE-7-S1 20 Yes W02SE-7U-S2 20 Yes W02SE-8-S1 20 Yes W02SE-8U-S2 20 No W02SE-9-S1 21 Yes W02SE-9U-S2 21 No W02SE-10-S1 20 Yes W02SE-10U-S2 21 No UW02SE-11 NA NA NA W02SE-12-S1 21 Yes W02SE-12U-S2 20 Yes W02SW-1-S1 21 Yes W02SW-1U-S2 21 Yes W02SW-3-S2 20 Yes W02SW-3U-S1 20 No 7.2 6.0 9.3 6.0 8.0 9.0 6.9 4.9 0.0 20.1 6.3 4.1 12.6 Appendix D Section Will 02 11.4 5.9 7.8 13.6 Page 427
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Draft Wetland Delineation Report South Suburban Airport Master Plan
Area IDTotal Depth
Hydric Soil
Native FQI Comments
W02NE-1-S1 21 YesW02NE-1U-S2 21 NoW02NE-4abc NA NA 9.0W02NE-5-S1 21 Yes Photo SW02NE-5U-S2 20 NoW02NE-6-S2 NA Na no soil coreW02NE-6U-S1 20 YesW02NE-7 NA NA 6.9
W02NW-2-S2 13 YesW02NW-2U-S1 20 NoW02NW-2U-S3 20 NoW02NW-5-S1 9 YesW02NW-5U-S2 18 NoW02NW-6-S1 21 YesW02NW-6U-S2 20 Yes corn fieldW02NW-7-S2 20 YesW02NW-7U-S1 21 NoUW02NW-8 NA NA NA Photo SEW02NW-9-S1 20 YesW02NW-9U-S2 21 Yes
W02SE-2 NA NA NA No data form, excavated pondW02SE-4-S1 20 YesW02SE-4U-S2 21 YesW02SE-5-S1 20 YesW02SE-5U-S2 21 YesUW02SE-6 NA NA NA Photo NW02SE-7-S1 20 YesW02SE-7U-S2 20 YesW02SE-8-S1 20 YesW02SE-8U-S2 20 NoW02SE-9-S1 21 YesW02SE-9U-S2 21 NoW02SE-10-S1 20 YesW02SE-10U-S2 21 NoUW02SE-11 NA NA NAW02SE-12-S1 21 YesW02SE-12U-S2 20 Yes
W02SW-1-S1 21 YesW02SW-1U-S2 21 YesW02SW-3-S2 20 YesW02SW-3U-S1 20 No
7.2
6.0
9.3
6.0
8.0
9.0
6.9
4.9
0.0
20.1
6.3
4.1
12.6
Appendix DSection Will 02
11.4
5.9
7.8
13.6
Page 427
Draft Wetland Delineation Report South Suburban Airport Master Plan
Area IDTotal Depth
Hydric Soil
Native FQI Comments
Appendix DSection Will 02
W02SW-5-S1 7 YesW02SW-5U-S2 15 NoW02SW-6U-S1 20 NoW02SW-6-S2 22 YesW02SW-6-S3 20 YesW02SW-6U-S4 23 NoW02SW-7-S2 NA NA No soil coreW02SW-7U-S1 20 YesUW02SW-8 NA NA NAW02SW-9-S1 25 YesW02SW-9U-S2 20 No
BWC-W02-S1 24 Yes Photo SWBWC-W02U-S2 20 No
NA = not applicable
6.6
0.0
8.0
9.8
12.8
AECOM December 16, 2009Page 428
XY
XY
XYXY
XY
XY
XYXY
XY
XYXY
XY
XYXY
XY XYXY
XY
XYXY
XY
XY
XY
XY XY
XY
XYXY
XY
XY
XY
XYXY
XYXY
XYXY
XYXY
XYXY
XYXY
XYXY
XY
XY
XY
XY
[�
[�
[�
[�
W2
W02SW-1
W02NW-6
W02
NE-1
W02SW-3a
W02SE-2W02SE-5
W02NW
-2
W02S
E-12a
W02S
E-8
BWC-W02
W02NE-7
W02SW-9
W02NE-5
W02SE-10
W02NW-7
W02SW-7
W02SW-3b
W02SW-5
W02SE-4
W02NW-9
W02SE-12b
W02SE-7
W02SW-6a
W02SW-6b
W02NE-6
W02SW-6dW02SW-6c
W02NW-5
W02NE-4a
W02NE-4c
W02SE-9
W02NE-4b
W02NE-1-S1
W02SE-9-S1
W02SE-8-S1
BWC-W02-S1
W02SE-7-S1
W02NW-7-S2
W02SW-6-S3
W02NW-2U-S3
W02NW-2-S2
W02NW-2U-S1
W02NW-6-S1
W02NW-5-S1
W02SW-7U-S1
W02SE-7U-S2
W02NE-6U-S1
W02NE-5U-S2
W02SE-4U-S2
W02SE-10-S1
W02SE-9U-S2
W02SE-8U-S2
W02SE-5U-S2
BWC-W02U-S2
W02SW-9U-S2
W02NW-7U-S1
W02SW-6U-S4
W02SW-5U-S2
W02NW-6U-S2
W02NW-5U-S2
W02SW-3U-S2
W02SW-3U-S1
W02SE-12U-S2
W02NE-5-S1
W02SE-4-S1
W02SE-5-S1
W02SW-9-S1
W02NE-6-S2
W02SW-6-S2
W02SW-5-S1
W02SW-1-S1
W02NW-9-S1
W02SW-1U-S2
W02NE-1U-S2
W02SE-12-S1
W02SW-6U-S1
W02NW-9U-S2
W02SE-10U-S2
UW02NW-8
UW02SW-8
UW02SE-6
UW02SE-11
EXHIBIT D-1FWill Township Section 2
2008 - 2009 FIELD INVESTIGATION RESULTSSouth Suburban Airport
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam/Ashkum silty clay loam not mapped; PEM seep
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes * No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Tiles present in seepy areaSeepy area at base of hillside; area riddled with t ile blowout holes filled with open water*No soil core taken due to high water table; no ve getation plot data recorded. Vegetation inventory recorded a dominance of wetland species.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus strobus (planted) Planted That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (A/B)1. Rubus allegheniensis Y FACU2. Rosa multiflora Y FACU Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Cornus stolonifera Y FACW Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. Lonicera tatarica N UPL OBL species x 1 = 05. -- -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Solidago gigantea N FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Elymus virginicus Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Calamagrostis canadensis N OBL4. Helianthus grosseserratus Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant throughout area. Percent cover not calculated because vegetation plot not selected.
Area is a mosaic of upland/wetland shrubs, wetland herbacious species and planted White pines. Vegetation inventory had dominance of hydrophtic species.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 435
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Ashkum silty clay loam Not mapped; PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes * No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Grassy area at base of hill with high water table; tile p resent with several blowouts.*Water table too high to extract soil core
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Helianthus grosseserratus 50 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Geum laciniatum 25 FACW4. Epilobium coloratum 10 OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Rorippa palustris 25 OBL6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
160 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 441
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil X or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X* No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:*Buried soil horizon from pond excavation on adjace nt property; mucky layer at 12"
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 100 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. -- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 443
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Drummer silty clay loam/Ozaukee silt loam PFO/Stream
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes * No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Groundwater-and field tile fed stream meandering through forested area at base of slope.
*No soil core taken due to inundation and high water table;
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)1. Cornus racemosa Y FACW2. Morus alba Y FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Lonicera tatarica Y UPL Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Elymus virginicus Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Geum canadense Y FAC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Polygonum virginianum Y FAC4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
data in remarks or on a separate sheet)Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam and Ashkum silty clay loam PEM; Stream
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil X or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Tiled drainageway with part open channel. Surround ing soil is highly eroded. Soil and hydrology disturbed due to channel dredging excavation
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Prunus serotina 5 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)5. --
5 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 35 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Helianthus grosseserratus 25 Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Andropogon gerardii 50 Y FAC4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
115 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 449
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Tiled drainageway
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species 1 x 2 = 2
FAC species 1 x 3 = 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species 4 x 4 = 161. Andropogon gerardii 65 Y FAC UPL species 3 x 5 = 152. Festuca elatior 25 Y UPL Column Totals 9 (A) 36 (B)3. Trifolium repens 5 N FACU4. Achillea millefolium 1 N FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.05. Lonicera tatarica 1 N FACU6. Potentilla simplex 1 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. Daucus carota 1 N UPL 50 Dominance Test is >50%8. Aster pilosus 5 N FACU 4 Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. Cyperus sp. 5 N Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
109 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 451
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil X or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Tiled drainageway with part open channel. Surrounding soil is highly eroded.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Prunus serotina 5 FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1 FACW3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
6 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Rubus allegheniensis 15 FACU UPL species x 5 = 02. Bromus inermis 50 UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3.4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
65 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Old field vegetation in eroded tree plantation (probably fo rmer pasture/crop land)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 453
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Seepy, unplanted slope in the center of White Pine planta tion
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. Rubus allegheniensis 30 Y FACU2. Sambucus canadensis 5 N FACW Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Agrostis alba 80 Y FACW- UPL species x 5 = 02. Helianthus grosseserratus 25 Y FACW- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Dactylis glomerata 10 N FACU4. Festuca elatior 10 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 456
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches) Color (moist) % % Type* Loc**
10YR 2/1 98 2 D M silty clay loam moist, friable; wet at 7"
Soil Unit Name: Ozaukee silt loam/Markham silt loam Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Unplanted in the middle of planted White Pine stand
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus strobus 60 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Solidago altissima 25 Y FACU UPL species x 5 = 02. Festuca elatior 50 Y UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Dactylis glomerata 25 Y FACU4. Agrostis alba 10 N FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
110 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Old field vegetation in eroded tree plantation (probably fo rmer pasture/crop land)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 458
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Cultivated field next to Black Walnut Creek. Probably til ed
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Abutilon theophrasti 20 Y FACU UPL species x 5 = 02. Setaria glauca 10 Y FAC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Mollugo verticillata 20 Y FAC4. Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
50 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Large sparsely vegetated low area next to BWC. Evidenc e of complete crop failure in 2008.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 461
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Drummer silty clay loam/Jasper loam Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Unvegetated crop field w/corn stubble
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 0 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: #DIV/0! (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. UPL species x 5 = 02. Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3.4. Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Plot in corn stubble of 2008 crop. Corn crop in this pl ot was a solid stand with no sign of washout or failure
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 463
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Long, low drainageway at west end of farm field and at base of slope
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1.2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Carex stricta 80 Y OBL UPL species x 5 = 02. Helianthus grosseserratus 10 N FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Aster simplex 1 N FACW4. Phalaris arundinacea 10 N FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Pastinaca sativa 5 N UPL6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
106 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
-87.69935981
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
W02NW-7 S2
41.37752692
Page 467
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Long, low swale at the base of a slope. Upland poi nt in adjacent old field
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)1. Rubus allegheniensis 35 Y FACU2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
35 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Daucus carota 1 N UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Bromus inermis 80 Y UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Festuca elatior 1 N UPL4. Pastinaca sativa 5 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Aster pilosus 1 N FACU6. Poa pratensis 40 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
128 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
W02NW-7U S1
41.37752692 -87.69935981
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 469
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Tiled drainageway outlet to Black Walnut Creek excavated recently. Spoil bank and fresh spoil present
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. Salix exigua 80 Y OBL2. Sambucus canadensis 20 N FACW Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Rubus allegheniensis 10 N FACU Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
110 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Elymus virginicus 60 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Ambrosia trifida 25 Y FAC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Dactylis glomerata 10 N FACU4. Trifolium repens 20 N FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
115 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Willow thicket mixed with old field vegetation
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 473
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Sample point is on spoil bank north of BWC channel at c orner of stream meander. Excavation for drain tile locate d ~35 ft south.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)1. Lonicera tatarica 20 Y FACU2. Acer negundo 5 N FACW Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Salix exigua 10 Y OBL Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
35 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 90 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Pastinaca sativa 5 N UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Arctium minus 5 N UPL4. Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominated by Bromus inermus. Salix along BWC bank a nd drainage channel
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 475
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
(A3) Black Histic (S6) Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)
(A4) Hydrogen Sulfide (F1) Loamy Mucky Mineral
(A5) Stratified Layers (F2) Loamy Gleyed Matrix
(A10) 2 cm Muck (F3) Depleted Matrix 1Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(A11) Depleted Below Dark Surface (F6) Redox Dark Surface wetland hydrology must be present.
X (A12) Thick Dark Surface (F7) Depleted Dark Surface
(S1) Sandy Mucky Mineral (F8) Redox Depressions
(S3) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat
Remarks: Hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATIONHydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: This plot is not located in a wetland.
Historic aerial photos show evidence of drain tile in this field and adjacent fields. Hydrology at this location has been impacted, so the hydric soil indicators
found at this location are likely relict and indicative of pre-tile conditions since no wetland hydrology is evident and hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.Page 479
TAROFF 0 TARAXACUM OFFICINALE 3 FACU Ad P-Forb COMMON DANDELION
Page 485
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 5/4/2009
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point: W02SE7 SC-1
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression on terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none: concave
Slope %: 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: Ashkum silty clay loam Not mapped; PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Drainage tile present in drainageway. Area is a de pression on terrace; field tile present.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1.2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. -- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)Common reed dominated area in meadow dominated by Bromus inermis
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
-87.6957424541.37206046 NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 486
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Tiled drainageway
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)1.2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species 0 x 1 = 05. -- FACW species 1 x 2 = 2
FAC species 1 x 3 = 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species 2 x 4 = 81. Bromus inermis 50 Y UPL UPL species 2 x 5 = 102. Poa pratensis 50 Y FAC Column Totals 6 (A) 23 (B)3. Cornus racemosa 1 FACW4. Cirsium arvense 1 FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.85. Daucus carota 1 UPL6. Taraxacum officinale 1 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- N Dominance Test is >50%8. -- N Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
104 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
-87.69574245 NAD83 Illinois East41.37206046
Page 488
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Large silky dogwood thicket
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. Cornus amomum 75 Y FACW2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Cornus amomum 10 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Geum laciniatum 20 Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3.4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
41.37212178
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
-87.69887516 NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
Page 501
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Prunus americana 30 Y UPL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)5. --
30 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 14% (A/B)1. Cornus stolonifera 20 Y FACW2. Prunus americana 30 Y UPL Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Juglans nigra 15 N FACU Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
65 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Achillea millefolium 25 Y FACU UPL species x 5 = 02. Solidago altissima 25 Y FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Poa pratensis 30 Y FAC4. Festuca elatior 10 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Trifolium repens 35 Y FACU6. Taraxacum officinale 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. Daucus carota 5 N UPL Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
140 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
41.37212178
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
-87.69887516 NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
Page 503
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches) Color (moist) % % Type* Loc**
10YR 4/2 90 10 C M clay loam Moist, friable; some gravel
POPDEL 2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Nt Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD
POTSIS 4 Potentilla simplex 4 FACU- Nt P-Forb COMMON CINQUEFOIL
RANABO 0 Ranunculus abortivus -2 FACW- Nt A-Forb SMALL-FLOWERED BUTTERCUP
RUBALL 3 Rubus allegheniensis 2 FACU+ Nt Shrub COMMON BLACKBERRY
SALINT 1 Salix interior -5 OBL Nt Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW
TRIREP 0 TRIFOLIUM REPENS 2 FACU+ Ad P-Forb WHITE CLOVER
Page 505
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 24-Apr-09
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point: W02SW-1 SC-1
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none:concave
Slope %: 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: Drummer silty clay loam Wetland Complex
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Large grassy area w/tiled drainageway
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. Salix exigua 35 Y OBL2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
35 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 65 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Poa pratensis 35 Y FAC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Bromus inermis 1 N UPL4. Ranunculus abortivus 1 N FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
102 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
41.37597275 -87.70536551 NAD83 Illinois East
Page 506
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Drummer silty clay loam and Markham silt loam Wetland Complex
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Ditching and tiling problable
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species 0 x 1 = 05. -- FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 1 x 3 = 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species 2 x 4 = 81. Rubus allegheniensis 10 N FACU UPL species 3 x 5 = 152. Bromus inermis 40 Y UPL Column Totals 6 (A) 26 (B)3. Poa pratensis 90 Y FAC4. Solidago nemoralis 10 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.35. Potentilla simplex 1 N FACU6. Daucus carota 1 N UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- N Dominance Test is >50%8. -- N Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
152 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
24-Apr-09
41.37597275 -87.70536551 NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 508
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
PHRAUS 1 Phragmites australis -4 FACW+ Nt P-Grass COMMON REED
POPDEL 2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Nt Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD
ROSMUL 0 ROSA MULTIFLORA 3 FACU Ad Shrub MULTIFLORA ROSE
RUBALL 3 Rubus allegheniensis 2 FACU+ Nt Shrub COMMON BLACKBERRY
SALALB 0 SALIX ALBA -3 FACW Ad Tree WHITE WILLOW
SALINT 1 Salix interior -5 OBL Nt Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW
SCIFLU 4 Scirpus fluviatilis -5 OBL Nt P-Sedge RIVER BULRUSH
SCIVAC 5 Scirpus validus creber -5 OBL Nt P-Sedge GREAT BULRUSH
SOLALT 1 Solidago altissima 3 FACU Nt P-Forb TALL GOLDENROD
TYPANG 1 Typha angustifolia -5 OBL Nt P-Forb NARROW-LEAVED CATTAIL
Page 510
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 23-Apr-09
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point: W02SW-3 S2
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none:Concave
Slope %: 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: Peotone silty clay loam PEM/PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Plot is near boundary of old field dominated by bromus a nd willow thicket at edge of open water.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Quercus palustris (planted) 10 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2. Acer saccharinum 20 Y FACW3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)5. --
30 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60% (A/B)1. Salix exigua 50 Y OBL2. Rubus allegheniensis 20 Y FACU Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
70 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 90 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Column Totals (A) 0 (B)3.4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
90 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7052009741.37082854
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 511
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ***Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Concretions and oxidized root channels in upper 6"
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Oxidized root channels
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
W02SW-3 S2
Matrix
Color (moist) Remarks
Redox Features
Texture
10YR 5/3
10YR5/6
0-6
6-20
Page 512
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 23-Apr-09
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point: W02SW-3 SC-1
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none:Concave
Slope %: 0 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: Peotone silty clay loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampl ing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Quercus macrocarpa (planted) 50 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)5. --
50 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25% (A/B)1. Rubus allegheniensis 25 Y FACU2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
25 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 80 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Solidago altissima 20 Y FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3.4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7052009741.37082854
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 513
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches) Color (moist) % % Type* Loc**
10YR 2/2 100 Moist, friable, silty clay loam
10YR4/3 95 5 Moist, friable, silty clay loam
10YR 5/6 75 25 Moist, firm; clay wet at 19"; some gravel
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam (Drummer silty clay loam is mappe d adjacent) PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Seepy drainageway with sedge meadow community
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Ulmus americana 25 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)5. --
25 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)1. Robinia pseudoacacia 20 Y FACU2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
20 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Agrostis alba 50 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Phalaris arundinacea 25 Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Lycopus americanus 10 OBL4. Carex cristatella 25 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Epilobium coloratum 25 Y OBL6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
135 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)Sedge meadow in drainageway
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
41.37475907
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.70714816
Page 516
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam/Ozaukee silt loam UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Seepy hillside has wetland elements in vegetation. Phalaris grows uphill.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Ulmus rubra 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)2. Robinia pseudoacacia 35 Y FACU3. Acer negundo 1 N FACW Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)5. --
66 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)1. Robinia pseudoacacia 30 Y FACU2. Rosa multiflora 5 N FACU Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
35 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Poa pratensis 45 Y FAC UPL species x 5 = 02. Bromus inermis 35 Y UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Phalaris arundinacea 5 N FACW4. Pastinaca sativa 2 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Solidago altissima 25 Y FACU6. Taraxacum officinale 1 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. Morus alba 1 N FAC Dominance Test is >50%8. Geum canadense 3 N FAC Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. Arctium minus 3 N UPL Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
120 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7071481641.37475907
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 518
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam not mapped; PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Grassy tiled drainageway; vent observed
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. -- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)Grassy field with evidence of drainage tile
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7067513941.37297593
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 521
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam Not mapped; PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Agricultural tile is present
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. -- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)Grassy tiled drainageway is monoculture of Reed Can ary grass
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
41.37281837
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
-87.7062927 NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
Page 523
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ***Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Field tile outlet present nearby (<50ft).
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
W02SW-6 SC-2
Matrix
Color (moist)
10YR 5/3
10YR 5/6
10YR 3/1
0-10
10-20
Remarks
Redox Features
Texture
12
Page 524
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 5/1/2009
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point: W02SW-6 SC-3
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none:
Slope %: 0 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Drainage tile present
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. Salix exigua 10 Y OBL2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
10 FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. -- Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.705956741.37276566
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 525
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Markham silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Drainage tile present
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Bromus inermis 10 N UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. --4. -- Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. --6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7055415641.37271166
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Page 527
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Ashkum silty clay loam Not mapped; PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present?* Yes * No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:*Soil core not taken due to inundation; Vegetation very sparsely scattered in ponded depression
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. -- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Echinochloa crusgalli 10 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Phalaris arundinacea 5 FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Ranunculus abortivus 5 FACW4. Epilobium coloratum 10 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Agrostis alba 25 Y FACW6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
55 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Naturally problematic?
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7045239641.37298062
Significantly disturbed?
Page 530
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Soil Unit Name: Beecher silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus strobus (planted) 50 Planted FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2. --3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)5. --
50 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1. --2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 70 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Pastinaca sativa 25 Y UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Achillea millefolium 10 N FACU4. Solidago nemoralis 10 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Daucus carota 5 N UPL6. -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
120 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East-87.7045239641.37298062
Page 532
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? (no soil core) Yes No * Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Long raised feature visible on NRCS aerial photos; appears to be location of drainage tile. *No soil core taken because of complete dominance of upland vegetation and no wetland hydrology.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)5. --
Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1.2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Bromus inermis 90 Y UPL UPL species x 5 = 02. Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3.4. Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5.6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
90 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
W02SW-8
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
NAD83 Illinois East
NWI Classification:
Page 534
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
PRUSER 1 Prunus serotina 3 FACU Nt Tree WILD BLACK CHERRY
QUEPAU 8 Quercus palustris -3 FACW Nt Tree PIN OAK
RANABO 0 Ranunculus abortivus -2 FACW- Nt A-Forb SMALL-FLOWERED BUTTERCUP
RHACAT 0 RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 3 FACU Ad Shrub COMMON BUCKTHORN
ROSMUL 0 ROSA MULTIFLORA 3 FACU Ad Shrub MULTIFLORA ROSE
RUBALL 3 Rubus allegheniensis 2 FACU+ Nt Shrub COMMON BLACKBERRY
RUMCRI 0 RUMEX CRISPUS -1 FAC+ Ad P-Forb CURLY DOCK
TAROFF 0 TARAXACUM OFFICINALE 3 FACU Ad P-Forb COMMON DANDELION
VIOSOR 3 Viola sororia 1 FAC- Nt P-Forb COMMON BLUE VIOLET
Page 536
Project/Site: Inaugural South Suburban Airport City/County: Will County Sampling Date: 4-May-09
Applicant/Owner: Illinois Department of Transportation State: Illinois Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): T. Radke; Robyn West Section, Township, Range: Section 2; T33N; R13E
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none:
Slope %: Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Unit Name: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NoHydric Soils Present? Yes X No Yes X NoWetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Low spot in tree plantation; ID'd on NRCS review
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Taxodium distichum (Planted) 50 Planted OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW3. -- Total Number of Dominant 34. -- Species Across All Strata: (B)5. --
75 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)1.2. -- Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. -- Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. -- OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Geum laciniatum 15 Y FACW UPL species x 5 = 02. Cyperus esculentus 10 Y FACW Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Rumex crispus 5 N FACW4. Helianthus grosseserratus 5 N FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5.6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. -- Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
35 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
W02SW-9 SC-1
NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 537
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology X Significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or hydrology Naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplin g point locations, transects, important features, e tc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No XHydric Soils Present? Yes No X Yes No XWetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:Upland soil core next to NRCS ID'd swale; probably tiled
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Taxodium distichum (Planted) 35 Planted OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0 (A)2.3. -- Total Number of Dominant4. -- Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)5. --
35 Percent of Dominant Species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)1.2. Prevalence Index Worksheet:3. Total % Cover of Multiply by: 4. OBL species x 1 = 05. -- FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU species x 4 = 01. Achillea millefolium 20 Y FACU UPL species x 5 = 02. Daucus carota 15 Y UPL Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)3. Solidago altissima 35 Y UPL4. Taraxacum officinale 5 N UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = #DIV/0!5. Erigeron annuus 10 N FAC6. Trifolium repens 15 Y FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:7. Bromus inermis 15 Y UPL Dominance Test is >50%8. -- Prevalence Index is ∗3.0*9. -- Morphological Adaptations* (Provide supporting
10. -- data in remarks or on a separate sheet)
115 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.1. --2. --
Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland?
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
Total Cover:
W02SW-9 SC-2
NAD83 Illinois East
HydrophyticVegetationPresent?
NWI Classification:
Page 539
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)