DRAFT A - 1 APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS Please note that the page numbers for the Synchro output sheets are discontinuous, since output sheets corresponding to the intersections evaluated as part of this SEIR have been included and output sheets of the remaing intersections that were studied for the EIR, but not analyzed for the SEIR have been deleted.
90
Embed
APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DRAFT
A - 1
APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS
Please note that the page numbers for the Synchro output sheets are discontinuous, since output sheets corresponding to the intersections evaluated as part of this SEIR have been included and output sheets of the remaing intersections that were studied for the EIR, but not analyzed for the SEIR have been deleted.
DRAFT
A - 2
2030 PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 95 84 186Volume Left (vph) 28 1 0Volume Right (vph) 60 0 8Hadj (s) -0.29 0.04 0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.3 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.11 0.10 0.22Capacity (veh/h) 795 798 833Control Delay (s) 7.7 7.8 8.4Approach Delay (s) 7.7 7.8 8.4Approach LOS A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 8.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: University Frontage South & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 15
Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 16 93 213Volume Left (vph) 5 0 14Volume Right (vph) 2 26 0Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.13 0.05Departure Headway (s) 4.6 4.0 4.1Degree Utilization, x 0.02 0.10 0.24Capacity (veh/h) 727 876 874Control Delay (s) 7.7 7.5 8.4Approach Delay (s) 7.7 7.5 8.4Approach LOS A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 8.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Addison Street & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 16
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 276 59 87 239Volume Left (vph) 13 20 17 35Volume Right (vph) 209 21 10 18Hadj (s) -0.41 -0.11 0.01 0.02Departure Headway (s) 4.4 5.0 5.0 4.8Degree Utilization, x 0.34 0.08 0.12 0.32Capacity (veh/h) 767 655 656 699Control Delay (s) 9.6 8.4 8.7 10.1Approach Delay (s) 9.6 8.4 8.7 10.1Approach LOS A A A B
Intersection SummaryDelay 9.6HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 60.3 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 66 141 524 832Volume Left 0 0 33 41Volume Right 66 141 28 77cSH 413 601 792 1065Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.24 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 23 3 3Control Delay (s) 15.4 12.8 1.1 1.0Lane LOS C B A AApproach Delay (s) 15.4 12.8 1.1 1.0Approach LOS C B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 28 36 34 75 40 77 344 14 50 610 96Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1726 1756 1770 1849 1770 1812Flt Permitted 0.72 0.91 0.27 1.00 0.52 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1280 1619 512 1849 963 1812Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 30 39 37 82 43 84 374 15 54 663 104RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 24 0 0 2 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 140 0 0 138 0 84 387 0 54 760 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 11.3 11.3 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7Effective Green, g (s) 11.3 11.3 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 305 339 1223 637 1199v/s Ratio Prot 0.21 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.09 0.16 0.06v/c Ratio 0.58 0.45 0.25 0.32 0.08 0.63Uniform Delay, d1 22.2 21.6 4.1 4.3 3.6 5.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.86Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 1.1 1.7 0.7 0.2 1.5Delay (s) 25.7 22.7 5.8 5.0 3.6 6.6Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 25.7 22.7 5.2 6.4Approach LOS C C A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis26: University Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 26
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 630 677 902 880 100 28Volume Left 15 0 32 0 38 4Volume Right 0 63 0 10 53 13cSH 379 1700 904 1700 368 164Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.40 0.04 0.52 0.27 0.17Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 3 0 27 15Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 18.4 31.4Lane LOS A A C DApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 18.4 31.4Approach LOS C D
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 27
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBR2 SELLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 3 56 67 140 58 189 61 219 0 124 0 187Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1726 1799 1583 1681 1681 1583 1770Flt Permitted 0.52 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 894 1799 1583 1681 1745 1583 1770Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 3 68 82 194 81 205 74 238 0 151 0 203RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 97 0 0 275 205 67 0 245 43 0 203Turn Type Perm Split Perm Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 2 6 6 3 8 7Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 14.8 14.8 3.1 21.0 21.0 10.1Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 14.8 14.8 3.1 21.0 21.0 10.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.14Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 362 319 71 499 452 243v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.04 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.13 0.14 0.03v/c Ratio 0.69 0.76 0.64 0.94 0.49 0.10 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 29.3 27.7 26.9 35.1 21.8 19.3 30.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 13.6 8.9 4.4 86.8 3.4 0.4 21.3Delay (s) 42.9 36.5 31.3 121.9 25.2 19.7 52.2Level of Service D D C F C B DApproach Delay (s) 42.9 34.3 37.4 32.8Approach LOS D C D C
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 28
Movement SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 416 3Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00Frt 0.85Flt Protected 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1583Flt Permitted 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 452 3RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 455 0Turn Type customProtected Phases 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 28.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39Clearance Time (s) 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 614v/s Ratio Prot c0.29v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.74Uniform Delay, d1 19.3Progression Factor 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.8Delay (s) 24.1Level of Service CApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis28: Parker Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 29
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 14 10 4 11 7 15 46 378 84 21 608 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1719 1770 1812 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.15 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1353 1583 1719 285 1812 535 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84Adj. Flow (vph) 20 14 6 16 10 22 55 455 101 25 724 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 21 0 0 12 0 0 0 4Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 34 2 0 27 0 55 544 0 25 724 8Turn Type Perm Prot Split Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 21.0 4.7 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21.0 4.7 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 472 115 139 882 260 906 770v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.02 0.30 c0.39v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.19 0.05 0.00v/c Ratio 0.08 0.00 0.24 0.40 0.62 0.10 0.80 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 17.4 31.2 11.5 13.3 9.8 15.2 9.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 1.1 1.9 1.3 0.2 5.0 0.0Delay (s) 18.2 17.4 32.3 13.4 14.6 9.9 20.2 9.3Level of Service B B C B B A C AApproach Delay (s) 18.1 32.3 14.5 19.7Approach LOS B C B B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.5 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis29: Grayson Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 30
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 4 3 11 71 12 21 84 543 66 12 560 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.97 0.99 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 1752 1828 1854Flt Permitted 0.92 0.78 0.86 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1575 1406 1590 1827Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 20 88 15 26 97 624 76 14 659 19RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 5 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 15 0 0 112 0 0 792 0 0 691 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 7.9 33.3 33.3Effective Green, g (s) 7.9 7.9 33.3 33.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.68 0.68Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 226 1076 1237v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.08 c0.50 0.38v/c Ratio 0.06 0.50 0.74 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 17.5 18.8 5.1 4.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 1.7 2.7 0.6Delay (s) 17.6 20.6 7.8 4.7Level of Service B C A AApproach Delay (s) 17.6 20.6 7.8 4.7Approach LOS B C A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.2 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Heinz Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 31
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 10 55 50 36 24 201 740 86 30 457 79Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1670 1768 1770 1834 1770 1821Flt Permitted 0.95 0.84 0.31 1.00 0.13 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1604 1511 576 1834 248 1821Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Adj. Flow (vph) 14 12 65 79 57 38 216 796 92 35 531 92RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 15 0 0 7 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 45 0 0 159 0 216 881 0 35 612 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 476 449 333 1060 143 1053v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.11 0.37 0.14v/c Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.65 0.83 0.24 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 16.3 17.7 9.1 11.0 6.6 8.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.2 4.3 5.7 0.9 0.8Delay (s) 16.7 19.9 13.4 16.6 7.5 9.4Level of Service B B B B A AApproach Delay (s) 16.7 19.9 16.0 9.3Approach LOS B B B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 20 59 19 13 59 156 980 48 50 443 47Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1828 1515 1810 1511 3484 4978Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1622 1515 1478 1511 3484 4978Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 18 30 89 27 19 84 173 1089 53 63 561 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 82 0 0 77 0 2 0 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 48 7 0 46 7 0 1313 0 0 673 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 67.5 21.8Effective Green, g (s) 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 67.5 21.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.61 0.20Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 120 117 120 2138 987v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 c0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.00 c0.03 0.00v/c Ratio 0.38 0.06 0.39 0.06 0.61 0.68Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 46.9 48.1 46.8 13.2 40.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.2 2.2 0.2 0.1 2.0Delay (s) 49.9 47.1 50.3 47.0 4.9 42.8Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 48.1 48.2 4.9 42.8Approach LOS D D A D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 75.1 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis35: University Avenue & 8th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 36
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 14 872 454 71 1198 610 60 45Volume Left 14 0 0 71 0 0 22 11Volume Right 0 0 18 0 0 11 33 25cSH 353 1700 1700 780 1700 1700 252 157Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.51 0.27 0.09 0.70 0.36 0.24 0.29Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 8 0 0 23 28Control Delay (s) 15.6 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 23.7 36.9Lane LOS C B C EApproach Delay (s) 0.2 0.4 23.7 36.9Approach LOS C E
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 1196 22 12 1440 6 43 58 13 20 88 116Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3427 3433 1785 1640Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.94 0.71 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 190 3427 3218 1298 1594Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1300 24 13 1565 7 47 63 14 22 96 126RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 32 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1323 0 0 1585 0 0 120 0 0 212 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 82.5 82.5 82.5 28.5 28.5Effective Green, g (s) 82.5 82.5 82.5 28.5 28.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 131 2356 2212 308 379v/s Ratio Prot 0.39v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.49 0.09 c0.13v/c Ratio 0.09 0.56 0.72 0.39 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 6.3 9.5 11.5 38.4 40.2Progression Factor 2.38 2.34 0.71 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.2 3.7 5.9Delay (s) 15.5 22.7 8.4 42.1 46.1Level of Service B C A D DApproach Delay (s) 22.7 8.4 42.1 46.1Approach LOS C A D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis38: Dwight Way & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 39
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 335 509 73 62Volume Left (vph) 13 77 10 20Volume Right (vph) 25 23 36 11Hadj (s) 0.00 0.04 -0.24 -0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.9 4.8 5.8 6.1Degree Utilization, x 0.46 0.68 0.12 0.10Capacity (veh/h) 694 735 524 513Control Delay (s) 12.1 17.2 9.6 9.8Approach Delay (s) 12.1 17.2 9.6 9.8Approach LOS B C A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 14.4HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis39: Heinz Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 40
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 80 111 64 32Volume Left (vph) 16 20 24 8Volume Right (vph) 18 11 27 12Hadj (s) -0.06 0.01 -0.15 -0.15Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.04Capacity (veh/h) 837 832 810 804Control Delay (s) 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.4Approach Delay (s) 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.4Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 7.7HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 19.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 108 1436 8 10 930 98 9 6 4 20 2 23Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3536 1770 3476 1767 1770 1491Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.83 0.80 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 466 3536 279 3476 1510 1490 1491Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 117 1561 9 11 1011 107 10 7 4 22 2 25RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 24 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1570 0 11 1115 0 0 17 0 22 3 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Effective Green, g (s) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.05 0.05 0.05Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 407 3086 243 3034 69 68 68v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.32 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.04 0.01 c0.01v/c Ratio 0.29 0.51 0.05 0.37 0.25 0.32 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 1.2 1.6 0.9 1.3 50.7 50.9 50.2Progression Factor 2.44 3.46 0.91 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.8 0.3Delay (s) 3.8 5.9 0.9 1.4 52.6 53.6 50.5Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 5.7 1.4 52.6 51.9Approach LOS A A D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 5.2 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis41: University Avenue & 10 Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 42
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 7 1028 515 413 825Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 7 0 1 0 0cSH 561 1700 1700 461 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.60 0.30 0.00 0.49Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis50: Addison Street EB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 51
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 44 66 1201 1067 35Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1645 1719 3438 3422Flt Permitted 0.98 0.20 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1645 354 3438 3422Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 45 58 82 1501 1199 39RTOR Reduction (vph) 43 0 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 0 82 1501 1236 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 8.2 42.8 42.8 42.8Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 44.3 44.3 44.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.74 0.74 0.74Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 266 261 2538 2527v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.44 0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.23v/c Ratio 0.23 0.31 0.59 0.49Uniform Delay, d1 21.9 2.7 3.6 3.2Progression Factor 1.00 0.15 0.13 1.36Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.4 0.8 0.1Delay (s) 22.3 2.8 1.3 4.4Level of Service C A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.3 1.3 4.4Approach LOS C A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 3.4 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis51: Allston Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 52
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis52: Bancroft Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 53
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 5.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis55: Grayson Street & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 56
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 100 75 157 1222 891 123Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1689 1719 3438 3359Flt Permitted 0.97 0.24 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1689 441 3438 3359Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 123 93 173 1343 938 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 24 0 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 0 173 1343 1059 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 4 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.4 92.6 92.6 92.6Effective Green, g (s) 18.4 92.6 92.6 92.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.77 0.77 0.77Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 259 340 2653 2592v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.39 0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.39v/c Ratio 0.74 0.51 0.51 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 5.2 5.1 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 10.9 5.4 0.7 0.5Delay (s) 59.4 10.5 5.8 5.0Level of Service E B A AApproach Delay (s) 59.4 6.4 5.0Approach LOS E A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis56: Heinz Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 57
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 10 54 90 1368 871 67Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 1719 3438 3393Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1562 1719 3438 3393Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 12 68 106 1609 990 76RTOR Reduction (vph) 64 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 106 1609 1063 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type ProtProtected Phases 4 5 2 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 6.2 12.1 95.8 79.7Effective Green, g (s) 6.2 12.1 95.8 79.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.11 0.87 0.72Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 88 189 2994 2458v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.06 c0.47 0.31v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.18 0.56 0.54 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 46.4 1.7 6.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.01 0.36 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 1.8 0.3 0.6Delay (s) 50.5 48.9 0.9 6.6Level of Service D D A AApproach Delay (s) 50.5 3.9 6.6Approach LOS D A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 6.2 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 58
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 48.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.6% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 97 295 164Volume Left (vph) 35 13 0Volume Right (vph) 41 0 8Hadj (s) -0.15 0.04 0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.8 4.4 4.5Degree Utilization, x 0.13 0.36 0.20Capacity (veh/h) 686 802 771Control Delay (s) 8.5 9.8 8.6Approach Delay (s) 8.5 9.8 8.6Approach LOS A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 9.2HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 35.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: University Frontage South & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 15
Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 60 295 192Volume Left (vph) 28 0 18Volume Right (vph) 9 29 0Hadj (s) 0.04 -0.03 0.05Departure Headway (s) 5.0 4.2 4.4Degree Utilization, x 0.08 0.35 0.24Capacity (veh/h) 652 830 788Control Delay (s) 8.5 9.5 8.8Approach Delay (s) 8.5 9.5 8.8Approach LOS A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 9.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 32.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Addison Street & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 16
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 207 133 314 239Volume Left (vph) 48 11 51 33Volume Right (vph) 87 80 24 5Hadj (s) -0.17 -0.31 0.02 0.05Departure Headway (s) 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.4Degree Utilization, x 0.31 0.20 0.46 0.36Capacity (veh/h) 594 575 637 618Control Delay (s) 10.9 9.8 12.7 11.4Approach Delay (s) 10.9 9.8 12.7 11.4Approach LOS B A B B
Intersection SummaryDelay 11.5HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 125.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 88 47 1127 768Volume Left 0 0 41 26Volume Right 88 47 47 104cSH 454 240 830 476Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.05Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 18 4 4Control Delay (s) 14.8 23.6 1.6 1.7Lane LOS B C A AApproach Delay (s) 14.8 23.6 1.6 1.7Approach LOS B C
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 239 142 131 36 96 37 63 743 28 39 542 78Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1773 1770 1850 1770 1815Flt Permitted 0.77 0.86 0.20 1.00 0.13 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1371 1545 377 1850 239 1815Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 260 154 142 39 104 40 68 808 30 42 589 85RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 15 0 0 2 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 537 0 0 168 0 68 836 0 42 666 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 24.8 24.8 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2Effective Green, g (s) 24.8 24.8 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 523 589 181 888 115 871v/s Ratio Prot c0.45 0.37v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.11 0.18 0.18v/c Ratio 1.03 0.28 0.38 0.94 0.37 0.76Uniform Delay, d1 20.1 13.9 10.7 16.0 10.7 13.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.86Incremental Delay, d2 46.3 0.3 5.9 18.9 4.2 3.1Delay (s) 66.4 14.2 16.6 35.0 13.9 15.0Level of Service E B B C B BApproach Delay (s) 66.4 14.2 33.6 15.0Approach LOS E B C B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 34.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis26: University Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 26
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 860 879 774 791 88 24Volume Left 7 0 16 0 38 4Volume Right 0 26 0 33 40 14cSH 461 1700 473 1700 143 119Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.52 0.03 0.47 0.61 0.20Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 3 0 81 18Control Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 63.7 42.9Lane LOS A A F EApproach Delay (s) 0.3 0.5 63.7 42.9Approach LOS F E
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 27
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBR2 SELLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 158 135 182 50 195 58 618 0 281 0 99Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1792 1583 1681 1681 1583 1770Flt Permitted 0.70 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1792 1583 1681 1761 1583 1770Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 193 165 253 69 212 71 672 0 343 0 108RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 325 0 0 322 212 64 0 679 124 0 108Turn Type Perm Split Perm Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 2 6 6 3 8 7Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 19.4 19.4 4.0 29.0 29.0 5.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 19.4 19.4 4.0 29.0 29.0 5.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.06Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 398 351 77 584 525 101v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.04 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.13 c0.39 0.08v/c Ratio 1.29 0.81 0.60 0.83 1.16 0.24 1.07Uniform Delay, d1 34.7 32.2 30.5 41.4 29.2 21.2 41.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 158.7 11.5 2.9 50.4 90.9 1.1 109.5Delay (s) 193.4 43.7 33.5 91.7 120.1 22.2 150.7Level of Service F D C F F C FApproach Delay (s) 193.4 39.7 87.5 62.3Approach LOS F D F E
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 86.6 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.4 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.0% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 28
Movement SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 439 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00Frt 0.85Flt Protected 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1583Flt Permitted 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 477 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 478 0Turn Type customProtected Phases 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 543v/s Ratio Prot 0.30v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 27.0Progression Factor 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.3Delay (s) 42.3Level of Service DApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis28: Parker Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 29
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 19 13 49 57 2 50 15 888 35 19 734 3Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1703 1770 1852 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.15 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1810 1583 1703 289 1852 176 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84Adj. Flow (vph) 27 19 70 83 3 72 18 1070 42 23 874 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 63 0 48 0 0 2 0 0 0 1Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 46 7 0 110 0 18 1110 0 23 874 3Turn Type Split Prot Split Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 2 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 7.5 7.5 10.1 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 7.5 10.1 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 193 168 244 174 1114 106 1120 952v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.06 c0.60 0.47v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.13 0.00v/c Ratio 0.24 0.04 0.45 0.10 1.00 0.22 0.78 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 28.9 28.3 27.7 6.0 14.0 6.4 10.6 5.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.5 1.3 0.3 26.0 1.0 3.6 0.0Delay (s) 31.8 28.8 29.0 6.2 40.0 7.5 14.1 5.6Level of Service C C C A D A B AApproach Delay (s) 30.0 29.0 39.4 13.9Approach LOS C C D B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.5 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis29: Grayson Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 30
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 33 66 54 7 13 8 896 49 20 859 6Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.98 0.99 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1708 1755 1849 1859Flt Permitted 0.94 0.55 0.99 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 1616 992 1836 1802Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 32 59 118 67 9 16 9 1030 56 24 1011 7RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 86 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 79 0 0 1093 0 0 1042 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 10.1 39.8 39.8Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 10.1 39.8 39.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.69 0.69Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 173 1262 1239v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.08 c0.60 0.58v/c Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.87 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 21.4 21.4 7.0 6.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 1.9 6.5 5.3Delay (s) 22.4 23.3 13.4 12.0Level of Service C C B BApproach Delay (s) 22.4 23.3 13.4 12.0Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 57.9 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Heinz Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 31
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 78 52 183 134 17 43 64 788 67 43 984 21Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1695 1747 1770 1841 1770 1857Flt Permitted 0.87 0.49 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1485 882 201 1841 210 1857Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Adj. Flow (vph) 93 62 218 213 27 68 69 847 72 50 1144 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 55 0 0 16 0 0 5 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 318 0 0 292 0 69 914 0 50 1167 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 441 262 116 1064 121 1074v/s Ratio Prot 0.50 c0.63v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 c0.33 0.34 0.24v/c Ratio 0.72 1.11 0.59 0.86 0.41 1.09Uniform Delay, d1 20.1 22.5 8.7 11.3 7.5 13.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.8 89.6 7.9 7.1 2.3 54.0Delay (s) 29.9 112.1 16.6 18.4 9.8 67.5Level of Service C F B B A EApproach Delay (s) 29.9 112.1 18.3 65.2Approach LOS C F B E
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 8 193 78 7 34 50 809 71 42 1163 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.99Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1784 1528 1781 1534 3466 5001Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1015 1528 1125 1534 3466 5001Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 88 12 292 111 10 49 56 899 79 53 1472 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 251 0 0 42 0 6 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 41 0 121 7 0 1028 0 0 1645 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 41.5 41.2Effective Green, g (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 41.5 41.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.38 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 213 156 213 1308 1873v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.03 c0.11 0.00v/c Ratio 0.71 0.19 0.78 0.03 0.79 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 45.2 41.9 45.7 40.9 30.3 32.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.1 0.4 21.1 0.1 0.5 5.0Delay (s) 60.3 42.3 66.8 41.0 7.1 37.1Level of Service E D E D A DApproach Delay (s) 46.9 59.3 7.1 37.1Approach LOS D E A D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 163.5 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis35: University Avenue & 8th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 36
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 30 1170 611 39 1049 552 83 44Volume Left 30 0 0 39 0 0 26 8Volume Right 0 0 26 0 0 27 40 29cSH 436 1700 1700 431 1700 1700 71 84Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.69 0.36 0.09 0.62 0.32 1.16 0.52Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 7 0 0 158 57Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 258.5 87.9Lane LOS B B F FApproach Delay (s) 0.2 0.3 258.5 87.9Approach LOS F F
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1642 15 14 1302 10 38 37 29 12 43 38Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3433 3429 1723 1681Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.91 0.87 0.96Satd. Flow (perm) 245 3433 3139 1523 1629Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1785 16 15 1415 11 41 40 32 13 47 41RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1800 0 0 1441 0 0 101 0 0 80 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 170 2389 2184 349 373v/s Ratio Prot c0.52v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.46 c0.07 0.05v/c Ratio 0.15 0.75 0.66 0.29 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 6.2 11.7 10.3 38.2 37.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 2.3 1.6 2.1 1.3Delay (s) 8.1 13.9 11.8 40.3 38.8Level of Service A B B D DApproach Delay (s) 13.8 11.8 40.3 38.8Approach LOS B B D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis38: Dwight Way & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 39
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 529 536 153 45Volume Left (vph) 22 39 26 16Volume Right (vph) 14 46 71 8Hadj (s) 0.03 0.00 -0.21 -0.01Departure Headway (s) 5.4 5.4 6.5 7.2Degree Utilization, x 0.80 0.80 0.28 0.09Capacity (veh/h) 646 649 505 442Control Delay (s) 26.4 26.6 12.1 10.9Approach Delay (s) 26.4 26.6 12.1 10.9Approach LOS D D B B
Intersection SummaryDelay 24.2HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis39: Heinz Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 40
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 187 162 173 108Volume Left (vph) 14 80 53 15Volume Right (vph) 68 15 87 32Hadj (s) -0.17 0.08 -0.21 -0.11Departure Headway (s) 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.9Degree Utilization, x 0.24 0.22 0.23 0.15Capacity (veh/h) 720 683 711 671Control Delay (s) 9.1 9.3 9.1 8.7Approach Delay (s) 9.1 9.3 9.1 8.7Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 9.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 944 14 32 1168 99 18 7 18 138 4 119Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 1770 3488 1710 1770 1525Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.86 0.77 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 311 3532 474 3488 1505 1437 1525Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 55 1026 15 35 1270 108 20 8 20 150 4 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 17 0 0 68 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 1040 0 35 1374 0 0 31 0 150 65 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 84.1 84.1 84.1 84.1 16.9 16.9 16.9Effective Green, g (s) 84.1 84.1 84.1 84.1 16.9 16.9 16.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.15 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 238 2700 362 2667 231 221 234v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 c0.39 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.07 0.02 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.23 0.39 0.10 0.52 0.13 0.68 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 3.7 4.3 3.3 5.0 40.2 44.0 41.2Progression Factor 0.47 0.47 2.02 2.32 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 8.0 0.7Delay (s) 3.1 2.3 6.7 11.8 40.5 52.0 41.8Level of Service A A A B D D DApproach Delay (s) 2.3 11.6 40.5 47.2Approach LOS A B D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis41: University Avenue & 10 Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 42
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 5 1009 530 578 1155Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 5 0 25 0 0cSH 556 1700 1700 462 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.59 0.31 0.00 0.68Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis50: Addison Street EB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 51
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 69 72 1185 1485 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1637 1719 3438 3419Flt Permitted 0.98 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1637 171 3438 3419Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 61 91 90 1481 1669 64RTOR Reduction (vph) 16 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 0 90 1481 1730 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 46.3 46.3 46.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.2 47.8 47.8 47.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.74 0.74 0.74Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 126 2528 2514v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.43 0.51v/s Ratio Perm c0.52v/c Ratio 0.48 0.71 0.59 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 24.3 4.8 4.0 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.67 0.43 3.30Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 25.2 0.8 0.1Delay (s) 25.6 28.4 2.6 15.3Level of Service C C A BApproach Delay (s) 25.6 4.0 15.3Approach LOS C A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis51: Allston Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 52
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis52: Bancroft Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 53
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 89.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis55: Grayson Street & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 56
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 150 98 1249 1601 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1660 1719 3438 3396Flt Permitted 0.98 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1660 154 3438 3396Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 132 185 108 1373 1685 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 43 0 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 0 108 1373 1796 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 4 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 82.0 82.0 82.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 82.0 82.0 82.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.75 0.75 0.75Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 287 115 2563 2532v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.40 0.53v/s Ratio Perm c0.70v/c Ratio 0.95 0.94 0.54 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 11.9 5.9 7.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.23 0.10 0.54Incremental Delay, d2 40.6 62.9 0.7 0.2Delay (s) 85.7 77.5 1.3 4.2Level of Service F E A AApproach Delay (s) 85.7 6.8 4.2Approach LOS F A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis56: Heinz Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 57
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 132 73 1280 1847 37Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1572 1719 3438 3426Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1572 1719 3438 3426Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 32 165 86 1506 2099 42RTOR Reduction (vph) 108 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 0 86 1506 2140 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type ProtProtected Phases 4 5 2 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 11.0 9.1 91.0 77.9Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 9.1 91.0 77.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.08 0.83 0.71Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 142 2844 2426v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.05 c0.44 c0.62v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.57 0.61 0.53 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 47.2 48.7 2.9 12.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.21 0.82 0.85Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 2.4 0.2 3.9Delay (s) 51.9 61.3 2.6 14.5Level of Service D E A BApproach Delay (s) 51.9 5.8 14.5Approach LOS D A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 58
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 115.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.7% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 148.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 101 83 712 738Volume Left 0 0 42 53Volume Right 101 83 16 111cSH 500 478 874 885Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.17 0.05 0.06Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 15 4 5Control Delay (s) 14.0 14.1 1.3 1.5Lane LOS B B A AApproach Delay (s) 14.0 14.1 1.3 1.5Approach LOS B B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 133 51 33 18 63 36 37 483 12 55 467 86Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 1750 1770 1854 1770 1805Flt Permitted 0.77 0.94 0.35 1.00 0.40 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1400 1662 658 1854 738 1805Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 145 55 36 20 68 39 40 525 13 60 508 93RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 29 0 0 1 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 224 0 0 98 0 40 537 0 60 592 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 14.1 14.1 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9Effective Green, g (s) 14.1 14.1 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 329 391 405 1140 454 1110v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.06 0.06 0.08v/c Ratio 0.68 0.25 0.10 0.47 0.13 0.53Uniform Delay, d1 20.9 18.7 4.7 6.3 4.8 6.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.88Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.3 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.8Delay (s) 26.6 19.0 5.2 7.7 4.8 6.6Level of Service C B A A A AApproach Delay (s) 26.6 19.0 7.5 6.4Approach LOS C B A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 14 6 54 18 23 126 31 561 15 37 568 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 1519 1823 1516 3510 5062Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1450 1519 1587 1516 3510 5062Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 21 9 82 26 33 180 34 623 17 47 719 6RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 75 0 0 164 0 1 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 30 7 0 59 16 0 673 0 0 771 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 60.4 23.4Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 60.4 23.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.58 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 127 133 139 133 2019 1128v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.04 0.01v/c Ratio 0.24 0.05 0.42 0.12 0.33 0.68Uniform Delay, d1 44.6 43.9 45.4 44.2 11.7 37.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.3 1.7Delay (s) 45.6 44.1 47.5 44.6 3.8 39.1Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 44.5 45.3 3.8 39.1Approach LOS D D A D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 27.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 1794 70 27 1395 36 30 39 59 21 45 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3415 3413 1667 1709Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.77 0.91 0.92Satd. Flow (perm) 195 3415 2638 1541 1593Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 1950 76 29 1516 39 33 42 64 23 49 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 19 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 2024 0 0 1582 0 0 121 0 0 92 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 136 2376 1836 353 365v/s Ratio Prot 0.59v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 c0.60 c0.08 0.06v/c Ratio 0.35 0.85 0.86 0.34 0.25Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 13.6 13.9 38.7 37.8Progression Factor 1.56 1.55 1.04 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.5 2.6 1.7Delay (s) 12.1 21.5 15.0 41.3 39.5Level of Service B C B D DApproach Delay (s) 21.3 15.0 41.3 39.5Approach LOS C B D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 19.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 50 895 15 22 1078 122 12 8 24 100 9 101Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3531 1770 3473 1689 1770 1541Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.91 0.79 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 352 3531 513 3473 1558 1467 1541Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 54 973 16 24 1172 133 13 9 26 109 10 110RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 23 0 0 87 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 988 0 24 1300 0 0 25 0 109 33 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 13.2 13.2 13.2Effective Green, g (s) 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 13.2 13.2 13.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.13 0.13 0.13Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 2784 405 2739 196 184 194v/s Ratio Prot 0.28 c0.37 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.05 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.19 0.36 0.06 0.47 0.13 0.59 0.17Uniform Delay, d1 2.8 3.3 2.5 3.8 40.8 43.4 41.0Progression Factor 0.33 0.34 2.30 3.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 5.0 0.4Delay (s) 2.2 1.4 5.7 11.9 41.1 48.4 41.4Level of Service A A A B D D DApproach Delay (s) 1.4 11.8 41.1 44.7Approach LOS A B D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis48: University Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 49
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 300.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 141.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 109.0 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 84 67 653 642Volume Left 0 0 39 37Volume Right 84 67 14 117cSH 558 511 951 943Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.13 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 11 3 3Control Delay (s) 12.6 13.1 1.1 1.0Lane LOS B B A AApproach Delay (s) 12.6 13.1 1.1 1.0Approach LOS B B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 147 35 29 13 48 40 34 411 15 32 422 75Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1724 1770 1850 1770 1806Flt Permitted 0.77 0.95 0.39 1.00 0.45 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1391 1650 734 1850 835 1806Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 160 38 32 14 52 43 37 447 16 35 459 82RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 33 0 0 2 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 220 0 0 76 0 37 461 0 35 533 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 40.6 40.6 40.6 40.6Effective Green, g (s) 15.4 15.4 40.6 40.6 40.6 40.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 330 391 458 1156 522 1128v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 c0.30v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.05 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.67 0.19 0.08 0.40 0.07 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 22.5 19.8 4.8 6.1 4.8 6.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.37Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.7Delay (s) 27.5 20.1 5.2 7.1 6.1 9.6Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 27.5 20.1 7.0 9.4Approach LOS C C A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 25 18 63 15 13 150 48 557 8 35 702 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1521 1815 1519 3515 5045Flt Permitted 0.80 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1485 1521 1537 1519 3515 5045Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 38 27 95 21 19 214 53 619 9 44 889 28RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 65 9 0 40 20 0 681 0 0 958 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 55.3 27.9Effective Green, g (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 55.3 27.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.53 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 142 143 142 1851 1341v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.01 0.03 0.01v/c Ratio 0.47 0.06 0.28 0.14 0.37 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 43.4 44.3 43.7 14.6 34.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.3 1.8Delay (s) 47.6 43.6 45.4 44.2 5.4 36.8Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 45.2 44.4 5.4 36.8Approach LOS D D A D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 42.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 1838 21 20 1356 25 59 48 26 33 19 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3431 3419 1747 1606Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.84 0.78 0.89Satd. Flow (perm) 225 3431 2868 1399 1444Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 28 1998 23 22 1474 27 64 52 28 36 21 68RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 28 2020 0 0 1522 0 0 138 0 0 92 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 93.5 93.5 93.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 93.5 93.5 93.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 162 2468 2063 296 305v/s Ratio Prot c0.59v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.53 c0.10 0.06v/c Ratio 0.17 0.82 0.74 0.47 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 5.9 12.5 10.9 44.8 43.2Progression Factor 1.79 1.75 1.13 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.8 0.2 5.2 2.5Delay (s) 11.1 22.7 12.5 50.0 45.7Level of Service B C B D DApproach Delay (s) 22.5 12.5 50.0 45.7Approach LOS C B D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 48 866 6 34 1011 87 17 6 23 90 12 101Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.93 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3535 1770 3487 1692 1770 1545Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.87 0.77 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 406 3535 540 3487 1502 1430 1545Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 52 941 7 37 1099 95 18 7 25 98 13 110RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 22 0 0 97 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 948 0 37 1191 0 0 28 0 98 26 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 12.9 12.9 12.9Effective Green, g (s) 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 12.9 12.9 12.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 2831 432 2793 176 168 181v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 c0.34 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.16 0.33 0.09 0.43 0.16 0.58 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 2.5 3.0 2.3 3.3 43.7 46.0 43.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 2.16 2.53 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 5.1 0.4Delay (s) 3.6 3.3 5.1 8.4 44.1 51.1 44.0Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 3.3 8.3 44.1 47.1Approach LOS A A D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis48: University Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 49
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 266.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 134.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
Movement Summary
University Ave / Frontage Road / IH 80 WB Ramp
Weekday PM Peak Hour Future 2030
Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement
Site: Weekday PMF 2030 H:\TETP\000000 - General Projects\103691 - Berkley CA\Sept 2009 Part 2 New Alignment\SIDRA\University RA with Mitigation.aap Processed Sep 29, 2009 04:38:28PM A1771, WSA, Large Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com
Roundabout
Vehicle Movements
Mov ID Turn Dem Flow (veh/h)
%HV Deg of Satn (v/c)
Aver Delay (sec)
Level of Service
95% Back of Queue
(ft)
Prop. Queued
Eff. Stop Rate
Aver Speed (mph)
Northbound Frontage Rd 3L L 36 2.8 0.300 9.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.66 24.4
8T T 212 1.9 0.300 3.5 LOS A 51 0.43 0.39 26.7
8R R 76 2.6 0.300 4.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.47 26.4 Approach 324 2.2 0.300 4.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.44 26.4
I-80 Off Ramp
11L L 155 1.9 0.184 10.8 LOS B 28 0.55 0.75 24.2 16T T 3 25.0 0.182 4.6 LOS A 28 0.55 0.54 26.4
16R R 1 50.0 0.182 5.6 LOS A 28 0.55 0.62 26.0
Approach 161 3.1 0.184 10.6 LOS B 28 0.55 0.74 24.2
Westbound University Ave
1L L 272 1.8 0.252 10.4 LOS B 46 0.57 0.72 24.2
6T T 234 3.0 0.252 5.0 LOS A 46 0.58 0.56 26.2 6R R 11 8.3 0.250 6.0 LOS A 45 0.58 0.64 25.8
Approach 518 2.5 0.252 7.9 LOS A 46 0.57 0.64 25.0
Southbound Frontage Rd
7L L 10 9.1 0.208 10.6 LOS B 34 0.60 0.78 24.1 4T T 209 1.9 0.207 4.7 LOS A 34 0.60 0.53 26.1
4R R 20 5.0 0.057 7.1 LOS A 8 0.59 0.66 25.7
Approach 240 2.5 0.207 5.2 LOS A 34 0.60 0.55 26.0
Eastbound University Ave
5L L 72 1.4 0.171 10.9 LOS B 29 0.59 0.74 24.1
2T T 152 3.3 0.171 5.0 LOS A 30 0.58 0.56 26.2 2R R 107 1.9 0.171 5.8 LOS A 30 0.58 0.62 25.8
Approach 331 2.4 0.171 6.6 LOS A 30 0.58 0.62 25.6
All Vehicles 1574 2.5 0.300 6.7 LOS A 51 0.55 0.59 25.5
Page 1 of 1Movement Summary
9/29/2009about:blank
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 64.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 125.6 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 138.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & Dwight Crescent Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 158 135 182 50 195 58 618 281 99 439 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1792 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1862Flt Permitted 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 1792 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 193 165 253 69 212 71 672 343 108 477 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 35 0 0 0 68 0 0 215 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 323 0 0 322 144 71 672 128 108 478 0Turn Type Split Split Perm Prot Perm ProtProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 8Actuated Green, G (s) 17.9 17.0 17.0 4.8 33.8 33.8 6.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.9 17.0 17.0 4.8 33.8 33.8 6.0 35.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 336 297 94 694 590 117 719v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.18 0.04 c0.36 c0.06 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.08v/c Ratio 0.94 0.96 0.48 0.76 0.97 0.22 0.92 0.66Uniform Delay, d1 35.9 36.5 32.9 42.4 27.9 19.4 42.1 23.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 32.4 37.7 1.2 28.6 27.2 0.8 59.3 2.3Delay (s) 68.2 74.2 34.2 71.0 55.2 20.3 101.4 25.3Level of Service E E C E E C F CApproach Delay (s) 68.2 58.3 45.2 39.4Approach LOS E E D D
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.7 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 176.8 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis54: Dwight Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 64.8 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 114.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated
West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 114.7 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.7% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
Movement Summary
University Ave / Frontage Road / IH 80 WB Ramp
Weekend Midday Peak Hour Future 2030
Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement
Site: Weekend MDF 2030 H:\TETP\000000 - General Projects\103691 - Berkley CA\Sept 2009 Part 2 New Alignment\SIDRA\University RA with Mitigation.aap Processed Sep 29, 2009 04:40:34PM A1771, WSA, Large Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com
Roundabout
Vehicle Movements
Mov ID Turn Dem Flow (veh/h)
%HV Deg of Satn (v/c)
Aver Delay (sec)
Level of Service
95% Back of Queue
(ft)
Prop. Queued
Eff. Stop Rate
Aver Speed (mph)
Northbound Frontage Rd
3L L 76 2.6 0.158 9.6 LOS A 22 0.43 0.68 24.4 8T T 52 1.9 0.159 3.8 LOS A 22 0.43 0.42 26.7
8R R 31 3.2 0.158 4.5 LOS A 22 0.43 0.49 26.4
Approach 159 2.5 0.158 6.7 LOS A 22 0.43 0.56 25.5
I-80 Off Ramp
11L L 78 2.6 0.093 9.7 LOS A 13 0.49 0.70 24.5
16T T 2 33.3 0.094 4.1 LOS A 13 0.49 0.48 26.6 16R R 1 50.0 0.091 5.1 LOS A 13 0.49 0.57 26.2
Approach 83 4.8 0.093 9.4 LOS A 13 0.49 0.69 24.6
Westbound University Ave
1L L 96 2.1 0.180 9.9 LOS A 29 0.47 0.68 24.4 6T T 300 3.0 0.180 4.0 LOS A 30 0.46 0.44 26.6
6R R 11 8.3 0.179 4.9 LOS A 30 0.46 0.53 26.2
Approach 408 2.9 0.180 5.4 LOS A 30 0.46 0.50 26.0
Southbound Frontage Rd
7L L 8 11.1 0.110 10.0 LOS B 16 0.50 0.71 24.3
4T T 110 1.8 0.110 4.0 LOS A 16 0.50 0.45 26.5 4R R 102 2.9 0.109 5.4 LOS A 16 0.52 0.59 26.0
Approach 221 2.7 0.110 4.9 LOS A 16 0.51 0.52 26.2
Eastbound University Ave 5L L 147 2.0 0.198 9.2 LOS A 33 0.39 0.63 24.6
2T T 201 3.0 0.198 3.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.38 26.9
2R R 139 2.2 0.198 4.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.47 26.4 Approach 487 2.5 0.198 5.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.48 26.0
All Vehicles 1358 2.8 0.198 5.7 LOS A 33 0.44 0.52 25.9
Page 1 of 1Movement Summary
9/29/2009about:blank
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID - Mitigated
West Berkeley Project EIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 142.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group