Top Banner
Appendix A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
101

Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Aug 14, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Appendix A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Page 2: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Table A-1: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 18 79 44 48 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

3/31/06 - 5/6/08 32 129 61 56 1.10 4.49 2.12 1.9710/1/52 - 5/6/08 8 676 72 58 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 7 326 79 70 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.443/31/06 - 5/6/08 19 461 92 78 0.66 16.07 3.21 2.7210/1/52 - 5/6/08 9 461 76 64 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 15 308 106 93 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.243/31/06 - 5/6/08 26 351 116 108 0.92 12.24 4.04 3.7510/1/52 - 5/6/08 18 862 99 82 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 11 384 70 42 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.463/31/06 - 5/6/08 18 460 84 57 0.63 16.03 2.93 1.9910/1/52 - 5/6/08 16 544 95 79 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 12 448 89 59 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.043/31/06 - 5/6/08 17 395 89 64 0.59 13.75 3.11 2.2210/1/52 - 5/6/08 9 395 59 47 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 5 537 105 47 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.643/31/06 - 5/6/08 18 651 112 53 0.63 22.68 3.91 1.8410/1/52 - 5/6/08 3 934 43 25 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1 156 32 13 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.453/31/06 - 5/6/08 9 148 35 28 0.32 5.15 1.21 0.9710/1/52 - 5/6/08 1 388 21 14 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1 31 8 4 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.133/31/06 - 5/6/08 5 64 18 18 0.19 2.24 0.63 0.6310/1/52 - 5/6/08 1 1435 22 12 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0 19 6 3 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.123/31/06 - 5/6/08 5 66 14 13 0.17 2.32 0.50 0.4410/1/52 - 5/6/08 1 383 23 13 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0 116 9 2 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.083/31/06 - 5/6/08 6 206 22 13 0.21 7.17 0.78 0.4410/1/52 - 5/6/08 2 814 34 18 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1 236 41 15 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.513/31/06 - 5/6/08 9 315 55 33 0.30 10.99 1.92 1.1610/1/52 - 5/6/08 4 513 50 38 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 3 82 34 33 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.153/31/06 - 5/6/08 9 126 46 44 0.30 4.38 1.62 1.5310/1/52 - 5/6/08 6 653 68 54 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88

Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0 537 53 28 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.963/31/06 - 5/6/08 5 651 63 40 0.17 22.68 2.20 1.4010/1/52 - 5/6/08 1 1435 55 39 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordRiver

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. NeponsetANNUAL

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. Neponset

E. Br. NeponsetSEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

RegressionR2 Value

0.71

0.75

0.65

0.89

0.88

0.83

0.89

0.90

0.85

0.81

0.25

0.62

0.80

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

Page 3: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-2 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-2: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Great Pond Dam Outlet

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 3.8 16.8 9.3 10.2 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.6 143.8 15.4 12.3 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.5 69.3 16.8 14.9 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.0 98.0 16.2 13.7 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 3.2 65.5 22.5 19.8 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.8 183.2 21.1 17.5 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.3 81.6 15.0 8.9 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.4 115.7 20.1 16.8 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.6 95.2 18.9 12.4 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.9 83.9 12.5 10.1 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.1 114.1 22.4 10.0 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.6 198.5 9.1 5.4 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 33.2 6.8 2.8 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.1 82.5 4.5 2.9 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.1 6.6 1.6 0.8 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.1 305.0 4.8 2.5 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.1 4.0 1.2 0.7 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.1 81.4 4.8 2.7 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.1 24.7 2.0 0.5 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.4 172.9 7.1 3.8 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 50.2 8.8 3.1 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.8 109.0 10.6 8.1 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.5 17.4 7.2 7.0 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.3 138.8 14.4 11.4 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.1 114.1 11.2 5.8 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.1 305.0 11.7 8.3 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

Note: A range of flow statistics for Great Pond Dam Outlet (drainage area = 6.1 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 4: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-3 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-3: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Sunset Lake Dam Outlet

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.31 1.38 0.76 0.84 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.13 11.78 1.26 1.01 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.12 5.68 1.37 1.22 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.16 8.03 1.33 1.12 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.26 5.37 1.84 1.62 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.31 15.02 1.73 1.43 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.19 6.69 1.23 0.73 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.28 9.49 1.65 1.38 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.21 7.80 1.55 1.02 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.15 6.88 1.03 0.83 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.09 9.36 1.83 0.82 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.05 16.27 0.75 0.44 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.02 2.72 0.56 0.23 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.01 6.76 0.37 0.24 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.01 0.54 0.13 0.06 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.01 25.00 0.39 0.20 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.01 0.33 0.10 0.06 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.01 6.67 0.40 0.22 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.01 2.02 0.16 0.04 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.03 14.17 0.59 0.31 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.01 4.11 0.72 0.25 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.07 8.93 0.87 0.66 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.04 1.43 0.59 0.57 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.10 11.38 1.18 0.94 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.01 9.36 0.92 0.48 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.01 25.00 0.96 0.68 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

Note: A range of flow statistics for Sunset Lake Dam Outlet (drainage area = 0.5 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 5: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-4 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-4: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Farm River at Monatiquot River

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 8.1 35.5 19.7 21.6 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.4 304.0 32.6 26.1 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 3.1 146.5 35.5 31.5 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 4.1 207.3 34.3 28.9 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 6.7 138.4 47.5 41.8 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 8.1 387.5 44.6 37.0 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.9 172.6 31.6 18.9 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 7.1 244.7 42.5 35.6 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 5.4 201.4 40.0 26.3 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 4.0 177.4 26.5 21.3 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.3 241.4 47.3 21.1 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.3 419.7 19.3 11.4 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.5 70.1 14.4 5.8 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 174.5 9.4 6.2 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.3 13.9 3.4 1.7 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 645.0 10.1 5.2 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 8.5 2.5 1.6 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 172.2 10.2 5.7 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 52.1 4.1 1.1 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.8 365.7 15.1 8.1 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.3 106.1 18.6 6.5 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.7 230.5 22.5 17.1 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.1 36.9 15.2 14.8 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.7 293.6 30.5 24.2 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 241.4 23.7 12.4 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 645.0 24.8 17.5 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

Note: A range of flow statistics for Farm River at Monatiquot River (drainage area = 12.9 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 6: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-5 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-5: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Cochato River at Former Diversion

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 6.7 29.5 16.4 17.9 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.8 252.2 27.0 21.6 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.6 121.5 29.4 26.1 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.4 171.9 28.5 24.0 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 5.6 114.8 39.4 34.7 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 6.7 321.4 37.0 30.7 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.1 143.2 26.2 15.7 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 5.9 203.0 35.3 29.5 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.5 167.0 33.2 21.8 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.3 147.1 22.0 17.7 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.9 200.2 39.2 17.5 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.1 348.1 16.0 9.4 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.4 58.2 11.9 4.8 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 144.8 7.8 5.1 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 11.6 2.8 1.4 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 535.0 8.4 4.3 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 7.1 2.1 1.3 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 142.8 8.5 4.7 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 43.2 3.4 0.9 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.7 303.3 12.5 6.7 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.3 88.0 15.4 5.4 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.4 191.2 18.7 14.2 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.9 30.6 12.6 12.3 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.2 243.5 25.3 20.1 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 200.2 19.7 10.3 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 535.0 20.6 14.6 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

Note: A range of flow statistics for Cochato River at former diversion (drainage area = 10.7 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 7: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-6 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-6: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Cochato River at Monatiquot River

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 7.0 30.6 17.0 18.6 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.9 261.6 28.0 22.4 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.7 126.1 30.5 27.1 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.6 178.3 29.6 24.9 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 5.8 119.1 40.9 36.0 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 6.9 333.4 38.4 31.8 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.3 148.5 27.2 16.2 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 6.1 210.6 36.6 30.6 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.6 173.3 34.4 22.6 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.4 152.6 22.8 18.4 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.0 207.7 40.7 18.2 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.1 361.2 16.6 9.8 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.4 60.3 12.4 5.0 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 150.2 8.1 5.3 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 12.0 2.9 1.4 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.3 555.0 8.7 4.5 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 7.3 2.2 1.3 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 148.1 8.8 4.9 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 44.9 3.6 0.9 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.7 314.6 13.0 6.9 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.3 91.3 16.0 5.6 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.5 198.3 19.3 14.7 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.0 31.7 13.1 12.8 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.3 252.6 26.3 20.8 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.2 207.7 20.4 10.6 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.2 555.0 21.4 15.1 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

Note: A range of flow statistics for Cochato River at Monatiquot River (drainage area = 11.1 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 8: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-7 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Table A-7: Annual and Monthly Flow Statistics for Monatiquot River at Hollingsworth Dam

Min Max Mean Median Min Max Mean MedianMonatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 16.2 71.3 39.6 43.3 0.63 2.75 1.53 1.67

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 6.9 610.4 65.4 52.4 0.26 23.57 2.52 2.02Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 6.3 294.2 71.2 63.2 0.24 11.36 2.75 2.44

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 8.3 416.1 69.0 58.1 0.32 16.07 2.66 2.24Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 13.5 278.0 95.4 83.9 0.52 10.73 3.68 3.24

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 16.2 778.0 89.6 74.3 0.63 30.04 3.46 2.87Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 9.9 346.5 63.5 37.9 0.38 13.38 2.45 1.46

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 14.3 491.3 85.4 71.4 0.55 18.97 3.30 2.76Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 10.8 404.3 80.3 52.8 0.42 15.61 3.10 2.04

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 8.0 356.1 53.2 42.8 0.31 13.75 2.05 1.65Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 4.7 484.6 94.9 42.4 0.18 18.71 3.67 1.64

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 2.7 842.7 38.8 22.9 0.10 32.54 1.50 0.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 1.0 140.8 28.9 11.7 0.04 5.44 1.11 0.45

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.6 350.4 18.9 12.4 0.02 13.53 0.73 0.48Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.5 28.0 6.8 3.3 0.02 1.08 0.26 0.13

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.6 1295.0 20.2 10.5 0.02 50.00 0.78 0.40Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.4 17.1 5.0 3.1 0.02 0.66 0.19 0.12

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.6 345.7 20.6 11.4 0.02 13.35 0.79 0.44Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.4 104.7 8.3 2.2 0.02 4.04 0.32 0.08

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 1.6 734.2 30.3 16.2 0.06 28.35 1.17 0.63Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.7 213.0 37.3 13.1 0.03 8.22 1.44 0.51

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 3.4 462.8 45.1 34.3 0.13 17.87 1.74 1.32Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 2.3 74.0 30.6 29.8 0.09 2.86 1.18 1.15

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 5.4 589.4 61.3 48.6 0.21 22.76 2.37 1.88Monatiquot 3/31/06 - 5/6/08 0.4 484.6 47.6 24.8 0.02 18.71 1.84 0.96

E. Br. Neponset 10/1/52 - 5/6/08 0.6 1295.0 49.9 35.2 0.02 50.00 1.92 1.36

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

ANNUAL

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

Month Flow (cfs) Flow per Drainage Area (cfs/mi2)Period of RecordGage

Note: A range of flow statistics for Monatiquot River at Hollingsworth Dam (drainage area = 25.9 mi2) have been estimated by adjusting to the Monatiquot River gage (drainage area = 28.7 mi2) and the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2).

Page 9: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-8 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of Annual Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (1952-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-1

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset RiverAnnual Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.9901x - 6.3975R2 = 0.8488

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-2

Page 10: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-9 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of January Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2007-2008)

East Br Neponset (2007-2008)

East Br Neponset (1953-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-3

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset RiverJanuary Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.781x - 1.1484R2 = 0.7088

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10 30 50 70 90 110 130

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-4

Page 11: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-10 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of February Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (1952-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-5

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset RiverFebruary Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.7651x + 12.146R2 = 0.7462

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-6

Page 12: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-11 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of March Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2007-2008)

East Br Neponset (2007-2008)

East Br Neponset (1952-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-7

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset RiverMarch Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.8811x + 8.9704R2 = 0.6532

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-8

Page 13: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-12 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of April Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (1953-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-9

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset RiverApril Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.9697x - 6.9925R2 = 0.8909

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-10

Page 14: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-13 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of May Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (2006-2008)

East Br Neponset (1953-2008)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-11

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River May Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 1.2367x - 15.531R2 = 0.8753

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-12

Page 15: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-14 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of June Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1953-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-13

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River June Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.9801x + 0.9318R2 = 0.8309

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-14

Page 16: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-15 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of July Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1953-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-15

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River July Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 1.3576x - 12.862R2 = 0.8879

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-16

Page 17: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-16 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of August Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1953-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-17

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River August Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.6369x - 3.469R2 = 0.8052

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-18

Page 18: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-17 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of September Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1953-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-19

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River September Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.3092x + 1.3261R2 = 0.248

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-20

Page 19: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-18 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of October Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1952-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-21

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River October Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.635x - 4.1875R2 = 0.6232

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 50 100 150 200 250

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-22

Page 20: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-19 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of November Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1952-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-23

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River November Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.9087x - 6.0583R2 = 0.7998

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-24

Page 21: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-20 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Comparison of December Flow Duration Curves for theMonatiquot River (No. 01105583) and East Branch Neponset River (No. 01105500) Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Monatiquot (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (2006-2007)

East Br Neponset (1952-2007)

Note: Flow data for the East Branch Neponset River gage (drainage area = 27.2 mi2) have been multiplied by a factor of 1.06 to reflect the drainage area at the Monatiquot River gage (28.7 mi2).

FIGURE A-25

Regression Relationship between Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River December Flows from 3/31/06 to 5/6/08

y = 0.832x - 2.653R2 = 0.8967

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

East Branch Neponset River Flow (cfs)

Mon

atiq

uot R

iver

Flo

w (c

fs)

FIGURE A-26

Page 22: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-21 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Great Pond Dam OutletBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage(10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-27

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Great Pond Dam Outlet: 6.1

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Sunset Lake Dam OutletBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage (10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-28

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Sunset Lake Dam Outlet: 0.5

Page 23: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-22 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Farm River at Monatiquot RiverBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage (10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-29

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Farm River at Monatiquot River: 12.9

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Cochato River at Former DiversionBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage (10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-30

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Cochato River at Former Diversion: 10.7

Page 24: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-23 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Cochato River Monatiquot RiverBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage (10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-31

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Cochato River at Monatiquot River: 11.1

Annual Flow Duration Curve for Monatiquot River at Hollingsworth DamBased on adjusted data from the Monatiquot River and East Branch Neponset River Gages

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of Time Flow is Equaled or Exceeded

Flow

(cfs

)

Adjusted from Monatiquot Gage (3/06 - 5/08)

Adjusted from E Branch Neponset Gage (10/52 - 5/08)

FIGURE A-32

Drainage Areas (mi2): Monatiquot Gage: 28.7 E Branch Neponset Gage: 27.2 Monatiquot River at Hollingsworth Dam: 25.9

Page 25: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Appendix B: Water Level Records

Page 26: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Tabl

e B

-1:

Wat

er L

evel

Dat

a fo

r Ric

hard

i Res

ervo

ir, U

pper

Pon

d, a

nd L

ower

(Gre

at) P

ond

from

Aug

ust 2

005

to P

rese

nt

Ele

vatio

n (ft

)V

olum

e (M

G)

% F

ull

Ele

vatio

n (ft

)V

olum

e (M

G)

% F

ull

Ele

vatio

n (ft

)V

olum

e (M

G)

% F

ull

8/8/

2005

8/14

/200

58/

15/2

005

125.

8953

6.4

90.0

%99

.62

150.

497

.0%

132.

1436

6.2

56.0

%8/

15/2

005

8/21

/200

58/

22/2

005

126.

0754

8.3

92.0

%98

.91

148.

896

.0%

133.

0241

2.0

63.0

%8/

22/2

005

8/28

/200

58/

29/2

005

126.

1956

0.2

94.0

%95

.12

133.

386

.0%

133.

2741

8.6

64.0

%8/

29/2

005

9/4/

2005

9/5/

2005

125.

2750

0.6

84.0

%97

.29

142.

692

.0%

134.

2549

7.0

76.0

%9/

5/20

059/

11/2

005

9/12

/200

512

6.56

584.

198

.0%

94.2

912

4.0

80.0

%13

3.77

431.

666

.0%

9/17

/200

59/

25/2

005

9/26

/200

512

5.52

518.

587

.0%

91.8

711

3.2

73.0

%13

5.39

549.

484

.0%

9/17

/200

59/

25/2

005

9/26

/200

512

5.52

518.

587

.0%

93.6

212

4.0

80.0

%13

5.35

549.

484

.0%

9/26

/200

510

/2/2

005

10/3

/200

512

5.52

572.

296

.0%

95.6

213

6.4

88.0

%13

3.52

431.

666

.0%

10/3

/200

510

/9/2

005

10/1

0/20

0512

6.39

584.

198

.0%

98.9

514

8.8

96.0

%13

5.44

549.

484

.0%

10/1

0/20

0510

/16/

2005

10/1

7/20

0512

6.77

596.

010

0.0%

101.

6215

5.0

100.

0%13

6.77

654.

010

0.0%

10/2

4/20

0510

/30/

2005

10/3

1/20

0512

6.77

596.

010

0.0%

101.

6215

5.0

100.

0%13

6.77

654.

010

0.0%

3/13

/200

63/

19/2

006

3/20

/200

612

6.48

584.

198

.0%

101.

6215

5.0

100.

0%13

4.27

497.

076

.0%

3/30

/200

64/

5/20

064/

6/20

0612

6.54

584.

198

.0%

101.

6215

5.0

100.

0%13

4.02

484.

074

.0%

4/24

/200

64/

30/2

006

5/1/

2006

125.

9454

8.3

92.0

%10

1.62

155.

010

0.0%

133.

7745

7.8

70.0

%5/

1/20

065/

7/20

065/

8/20

0612

6.06

554.

393

.0%

100.

3215

1.9

98.0

%13

4.48

510.

178

.0%

5/8/

2006

5/14

/200

65/

15/2

006

126.

7759

6.0

100.

0%10

1.62

155.

010

0.0%

136.

7765

4.0

100.

0%9/

11/2

006

9/17

/200

69/

18/2

006

125.

2746

4.9

78.0

%10

1.62

155.

010

0.0%

130.

7728

7.8

44.0

%10

/9/2

006

10/1

5/20

0610

/16/

2006

125.

9654

2.4

91.0

%89

.62

99.2

64.0

%13

2.44

405.

562

.0%

11/6

/200

611

/12/

2006

11/1

3/20

0612

5.77

530.

489

.0%

97.2

913

8.0

89.0

%13

4.44

497.

076

.0%

11/6

/200

611

/12/

2006

11/1

3/20

0612

5.77

530.

489

.0%

97.2

913

8.0

89.0

%13

4.44

497.

076

.0%

11/1

3/20

0611

/19/

2006

11/2

0/20

0612

6.31

572.

296

.0%

97.2

915

1.9

98.0

%13

4.77

582.

189

.0%

6/18

/200

76/

24/2

007

6/25

/200

712

6.48

524.

588

.0%

101.

6215

5.0

100.

0%13

4.27

536.

382

.0%

7/16

/200

712

6.47

572.

296

.0%

100.

0015

1.7

97.9

%13

1.77

313.

948

.0%

7/23

/200

712

6.23

572.

296

.0%

95.6

613

4.9

87.0

%13

2.36

313.

948

.0%

8/6/

2007

126.

3556

6.2

95.0

%89

.12

91.5

59.0

%13

3.19

313.

948

.0%

9/7/

2007

125.

2548

8.7

82.0

%86

.62

60.5

39.0

%13

1.33

313.

948

.0%

9/24

/200

712

5.27

500.

684

.0%

90.9

010

5.4

68.0

%12

8.27

183.

128

.0%

10/1

/200

712

4.89

484.

381

.3%

91.3

011

0.0

71.0

%12

7.52

156.

924

.0%

10/9

/200

712

4.68

470.

879

.0%

92.1

211

4.7

74.0

%12

6.77

130.

820

.0%

10/1

5/20

0712

4.18

435.

073

.0%

92.6

211

9.3

77.0

%12

6.77

130.

820

.0%

10/2

2/20

0712

4.93

482.

781

.0%

88.1

288

.357

.0%

126.

2711

1.1

17.0

%10

/29/

2007

124.

6847

0.8

79.0

%85

.87

58.9

38.0

%12

6.00

104.

616

.0%

12/1

0/20

0712

4.24

435.

073

.0%

89.6

297

.663

.0%

125.

4391

.514

.0%

12/2

4/20

0712

3.97

417.

270

.0%

92.6

211

9.4

77.0

%12

6.02

111.

117

.0%

12/3

1/20

0712

4.68

464.

878

.0%

99.4

614

8.8

96.0

%12

6.93

137.

321

.0%

12/3

1/20

0712

4.68

464.

878

.0%

99.4

614

8.8

96.0

%12

6.93

137.

321

.0%

1/6/

2008

124.

6849

4.6

83.0

%99

.28

148.

896

.0%

128.

1818

3.1

28.0

%1/

15/2

007

126.

0755

4.2

93.0

%10

1.62

155.

010

0.0%

129.

7724

8.5

38.0

%1/

22/2

008

126.

0758

4.0

98.0

%10

1.62

155.

010

0.0%

130.

9330

0.8

46.0

%1/

28/2

008

126.

3157

2.1

96.0

%10

0.12

151.

998

.0%

131.

7734

6.6

53.0

%2/

4/20

0812

6.31

554.

293

.0%

101.

0315

3.4

99.0

%13

2.52

385.

859

.0%

2/25

/200

812

6.93

560.

294

.0%

102.

3715

1.7

97.9

%13

6.77

523.

280

.0%

Ric

hard

i Res

ervo

irU

pper

Pon

dG

reat

Pon

dSt

art

Dat

eEn

dD

ate

Rep

ort

Dat

e

Page 27: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Appendix C: Records from Massachusetts Dam Safety on:

Hollingsworth Dam (also called Armstrong Dam) Sunset Lake Dam Great Pond Dam

Page 28: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Hollingsworth Dam (also called Armstrong Dam)

Page 29: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 30: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 31: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 32: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 33: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 34: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 35: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 36: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 37: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 38: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 39: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 40: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 41: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 42: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 43: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 44: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 45: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 46: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 47: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 48: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 49: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 50: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 51: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 52: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 53: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 54: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Sunset Lake Dam

Page 55: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 56: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 57: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 58: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 59: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 60: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 61: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 62: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results

Great Pond Dam

Page 63: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 64: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 65: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 66: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 67: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 68: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 69: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 70: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 71: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 72: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 73: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 74: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 75: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 76: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 77: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 78: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 79: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 80: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 81: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 82: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 83: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 84: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 85: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 86: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 87: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 88: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 89: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 90: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 91: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 92: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 93: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 94: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 95: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 96: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 97: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 98: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 99: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 100: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results
Page 101: Appendix A- Hydrologic Assessment Results...Feasibility Analysis to Restore A-1 Existing Data Report River Herring to the Fore River June 2008 APPENDIX A: Hydrologic Assessment Results