Appellate Brief Writing - Iowa Defense Counsel … · Appellate Brief Writing ... Standard or scope of appellate review ... Conversion of proof briefs to final briefs. 28. RESOURCES.

1

Appellate Brief Writing

By The Honorable Thomas D. WatermanJustice – Iowa Supreme Court

2

Combine the ideal brief with the stellar oral argumentPractice the ABC’s

– Accuracy– Brevity– Clarity

3

THE IDEAL BRIEFProvides effortless comprehensionWins the Judge’s heart and mindGives a roadmap to desired resultSpoonfeeds the facts and law so that

ruling practically writes itselfScalia: “The overarching objective of a

brief is to make the court’s job easier.”

4

ACCURACYNever misstate the law or the facts

Comply with the rules:– Contents of brief– Word limits– Format– Citation form– Deadlines

5

Proofread – zero tolerance for:– Typos– Grammar errors– Misspellings– Miscitations

Be true to the “record”

6

PROOFREADING REMINDERS

Borrow another set of eyesFinish early – well before deadlineDo authority checks:

– Keycite cases– Check quotations– Check citations to “record”– Don’t rely 100% on spell check (examples:

principle vs. principal)

7

Check your edits (compare old to new draft)

Table of Authorities – check for consistency

8

BREVITYOptimize organization (theme and

sequence)Make every word countEliminate clutter:

– Useless detail– Needless repetition– Weak points

Edit unnecessary wordsPrefer the active voice

9

CLARITYScalia: “Value clarity above all other

elements of style”Use table of contents with informative

headingsOrient the reader:

– Provide context up front– Give the “big picture” so that supporting

detail falls into place; use “themes”– Scalia: put question first– Professor Terrell: Roadmap w/matching

road signs “make reader smart”

10

Consider a “Summary of Argument”

Use bullet points/lists Use quotations effectively:

– Lead in sentence– Don’t over-quote– Proper emphasis– Internal citations– Don’t “lead with your chin” by omissions

11

• Use footnotes effectively:– String citations– Tangential issues of possible interest

12

Eliminate distractions:– Abbreviations that must be decoded– Awkward sentences– Big words– Tough sells

Specify relief requestedCitations:

– Always give jump cites– Give volume and page number with short

cites

13

PRACTICE POINTERS Case law selection:

– Cite to both reviewing court and to court of last resort on governing law

– Beware outcome– Honor duty to cite adverse authority– String citations (use parentheticals or a lead

in sentence or replace with single case that surveys the field)

– “Unpublished” authority– Analyze key cases

14

Questions of first impression:– Brief the law from other jurisdictions

(trend? majority rule?)– Show how your proposed rule fits with

existing law (conversely, show how opponent’s conflicts)

– Show how policy behind the rule is furthered

– Argue ramifications (slippery slope/flood gates vs. deterrence)

– Get help from Amci– Address Restatement (Third) position

15

• Attempts to overturn precedent:- Stare decisis: argue “precedent on

precedent” –- Was targeted decision wrongly decided at

the time? Dissents?- Scholarly criticism? Minority view?- Have changing circumstances eroded

purpose behind rule? - Has rule led to problems or fallen out of

step with other developments? -Legislative inacquiescence?

16

Rifle vs. Shotgun – factors to consider:

– Don’t invite reversible error– Maintain credibility (don’t use “loser”

argument)– Don’t dilute strong arguments with weak ones– Know your audience (will judge split the

baby? will the opponent give up?)– Education value (priming the pump vs.

spoiling a surprise)– Alternative grounds for affirmance on appeal– Increasing comfort level for desired outcome

17

Frame the issues persuasivelyStatement of the facts:

– Tell a story that fits theme– Correct opponent’s “spin”– Poison the well?

Prefer understatement to exaggerationArgue standard/scope of review

18

Before briefing:

Determine the “record” earlyAscertain the governing rules earlyExpect no second extension of time or relief

from page limits – finish early!Keep opponent honest (Motion to Strike?)Consider seeking Amicus brief(s)

19

APPELLANT’S BRIEF (Iowa)See Iowa R. App. P. 6.903 et. seq.

• Table of Contents- Informative headings and subheadings

should read like a summary of argument• Table of Authorities

- Organization (cases alphabetically; statutes numerically; other authorities)

- No jump cites; “passim”

20

- Consistency with abbreviations/citation form in text

- Proofreading

• Statement of Issues- Vitally important to frame issues effectively

Statement of the Case- Introductory sentence should orient reader

21

-Short procedural history of caseStatement of Facts

- Organize thematically- Tell a story that fits theme- Quote favorable passages from ruling(s)

below- Don’t be conclusory or overtly

argumentative – let the facts persuade- Goal “compels” outcome – Prof. Terrell

22

• Routing Statement- See Iowa R. App. 6.903(2)(d) & 6.1101- Strategic Considerations

• Argument– Consider a “summary of argument”– Standard or scope of appellate review

- How much leeway to be given to tribunal below

23

- Preservation of error- Purposes:-Appellate court gets to go second-Trial court is to get opportunity to

correct error-Opponent to get chance to respond below-Therefore, can’t raise new issue on appeal

- Sequence of arguments

24

• Short Conclusion- Be specific and clear on relief sought

25

APPELLEE’S BRIEF• (Re)frame issues presented for review• Statement of Case/Facts

– Do own or “tell rest of the story”?– Quote favorable parts of ruling(s) below

• Standard/Scope of Review• Preservation of Error/Waiver• Sequence of Argument• Conclusion

26

REPLY BRIEFSReply Briefs:

– Refocus reader on your world view (without rearguing initial brief)

– Scalia: Reply should be “self-contained” for “retro-readers”

– Highlight opponent’s overt and tacit concessions

– Repair damage to your position– Distinguish opponent’s cases succinctly

27

APPENDIX• See Iowa R. App. P. 6.905• Contents must be from “record”• Index (Table of Contents)• Transcripts – identify witness on every page• Don’t over/under designate • If not in record, try:

- judicial notice- stipulation- argue “legislative fact”

• Conversion of proof briefs to final briefs

28

RESOURCES1. Scalia & Garner, Making Your Case, The Art

of Persuading Judges2. Strunk & White, The Elements of Style3. Roget’s Thesaurus4. Webster’s (or your favorite dictionary)5. Black’s Law Dictionary6. Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations7. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations8. America’s Popular Proverbs and Sayings9. Blue Book (or “Maroon” book) but follow the

governing Court Rules (e.g. Iowa R. App. P. 6.14(5))

29

WRITER’S BLOCK• Leading causes

- Unresolved issues or muddled thinking- Distractions- Feeling overwhelmed- Chicken – egg problems

• Remedies- Think it through- Outline First- Write discrete sections (marathon analogy)

30

- Use checklists- Do something else- Quiet time

31

INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS• Better odds if both sides join• Focus on standards (granted “sparingly” –

“fat chance”)• Institutional bias against piecemeal

appeals- increased costs- disrupts trial court proceedings- increases workload- unstated reason -- most issues “go away”

through settlement or resolution on other grounds

32

• Court will want to know:- Why can’t it wait?- Did trial court get it wrong or right?

• Best candidates:- Dispositive legal issue that is question of

first impression with split in authority in other jurisdictions

- Privilege or confidentiality with irreparable harm that cannot be cured on appeal after final judgment

Thirty-day deadline (but possible to obtain review of earlier interlocutory orders that are intertwined). Hammer v. Branstad

33

• Consider conditional resistance/cross-appeal

• Consider limited remand• Look for similar cases under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(6). See Benco Mortgage Co. v. Steil, 351 N.W.2d 784, 787 (Iowa 1984)

34

APPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW

• Focus on grounds in Iowa R. App. P. 6.1103

• But still argue merits• 20-day deadline• If granted, reversal or modification likely

35

THANK YOU