APPealing Curriculum Tool Kit Tanya Heard, Fort Bend ISD Educational Technology Coordinator http://TodaysMeet.com/ISTEE2013APPealing Monday, June 24, 13
APPealing Curriculum Tool KitTanya Heard, Fort Bend ISD
Educational Technology Coordinator
http://TodaysMeet.com/ISTEE2013APPealing
Monday, June 24, 13
Fort Bend ISD
45 Elementary Schools
14 Middle Schools
11 High Schools
Monday, June 24, 13
Work Shop Objectives
Create Digital Based Lesson Plans for Higher Order Thinking
Original Bloom’s Taxonomy
Updated Bloom’s Taxonomy
Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy
Lesson Creation Ideas
Suggested Apps
Monday, June 24, 13
Brief History of Bloombased on The New Taxonomy of Objectives by Marano & Kendall
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classi:ication of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (1956) by Benjamin Bloom editor
Bloom Taxonomy may have had minimal in0luence on curriculum development; however, it has a strong effect on evaluation.
Monday, June 24, 13
Bloom’s Taxonomy proved to be a powerful tool for objectives-‐based evaluation in that it allowed for a level of detail in stating goals that had not previously been readily attained.
1984 the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) called for an updated to the Bloom’s Taxonomy to include current research and theory on the nature of knowledge.
Brief History of Bloombased on The New Taxonomy of Objectives by Marano & Kendall
Monday, June 24, 13
Bloom’s Taxonomy proved to be a powerful tool for objectives-‐based evaluation in that it allowed for a level of detail in stating goals that had not previously been readily attained.
1984 the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) called for an updated to the Bloom’s Taxonomy to include current research and theory on the nature of knowledge.
Monday, June 24, 13
Brief History of Bloombased on The New Taxonomy of Objectives by Marano & Kendall
Learning NC: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/4719
Monday, June 24, 13
Criticisms of Bloom’s based on The New Taxonomy of Objectives by Marano & Kendall
Learning NC: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/4719
Oversimpli0ied the nature of thought and the relationship to learning (Furst, 1994).
The Evaluation Level should not be the 0inal step in thinking and problem solving (Bloom, 1956).
The Hierarchical structure of Bloom’s Taxonomy simply did not hold together well from logical or empirical perspectives (Rohwer and Sloane, 1994).
Monday, June 24, 13
1990’s Update of Bloom’sUpdate by Lorin Anderson
Thinking requires active engagement
Monday, June 24, 13
Bloom’s Digital TaxonomyPosted byDanny Mass: eduloghttp://maasd.edublogs.org/2012/04/26/linking-ipads-blooms-taxonomy/
Monday, June 24, 13
Bloom’s Digital TaxonomyAssembled by Kathy Schrockhttp://educationaltechnologyguy.blogspot.com/2011/10/android-apps-related-to-blooms-taxonomy.html
Monday, June 24, 13
Bloom’s Digital TaxonomyAssembled by Langwitcheshttp://edgalaxy.com/journal/2012/5/23/blooms-ipad-taxonomy.html
Monday, June 24, 13
Resources for Finding Apps
Apps Gone Free App Shopper
Tech Chef 4 UApple Distinguished
Educators site
Monday, June 24, 13
Resources for Activity Ideas
iPad Lesson Ideas - Ideas for Integrating iPads into your Lesson Plans
App-y Meal
Apptivities
Monday, June 24, 13
Suggested Apps Building Lessons
Socrative AR
Freedom Stories
AR Aurasma
Edmod Trading Cards Keynote
ARBasketball Pic Collage Mobile DE
NearPod i-nigma Khan Academy
Creative Book
BuilderAR String BaiBoard
Monday, June 24, 13
AR Basketball
Monday, June 24, 13
QR CodesQR Generator: QRStuff.com
Story Cubes
The Amazing QRace
Monday, June 24, 13
AR Freedom Stories
Monday, June 24, 13
AR String
Monday, June 24, 13
AR Aurasma
Monday, June 24, 13
APPealing Curriculum Tool KitTanya Heard
[email protected], June 24, 13