Top Banner
APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents
15

APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

Theodora Dixon
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source

documents

Page 2: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Objectives To define the different components of APPARTS

To practice the skill of APPARTSing

To consider how this activity might be useful in your own classroom

Page 3: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Common Core State Standards

CC Reading Standards:1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to

support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text…

2. …Provide an objective summary of the text.

7. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principals and use of legal reasoning and the premise, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy.

Page 4: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Introduction and Acknowledgements

Activity borrowed from Matthew Ellington

About me

Page 5: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Supplies You will need either a piece of paper and a pen

or a word doc.

Page 6: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

What do you notice? What do you see?

Page 7: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

What do you notice? What do you see?

Page 8: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

What do you notice? What do you see?

Page 9: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

What do you notice? What do you see?

Page 10: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.
Page 11: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Analysis Questions Who created these woodcuts? How do you know? What is their point of view? How do you know?Where and when was this source produced? How

might this effect the meaning of the source?What do you know that would help you further

understand the primary source?For whom were the woodcuts created? How might this

affect the reliability of the source?Why were these woodcuts produced at the time they

were produced?What point is the Document trying to convey?What inferences can you draw from this document?

And ask yourself ‘so what’ in relation to that.

Page 12: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

APPARTS !Congratulations you just figured out how to

analyze primary sources

Page 13: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

APPARTS A = author – who is the speaker?

P = Place and time – When was this written/said. What else was going on?

P = Prior Knowledge – What else was going on? What other events are connected to this?

A = Audience – who is the intended audience? Who is being spoken to?

R = Reason – What is the purpose? Why was this said/written?

T = The Main Idea – Summarize the author’s point. What is this about?

S = Significance – Why is this important? What impact did it have?

Page 14: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

Let’s try it againRead through the two lists

In your table group, APPARTS the documents

Page 15: APPARTS A quick and dirty method for analyzing primary source documents.

1993 DBQ Individually, using your notes from APPARTSing

the two lists, create a thesis statement that addresses the following prompt:

Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled by people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. Why did this difference in development occur?