2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 1 API Gas Lift Design • API RP 11V6: Recommended Practice for Design of Continuous Flow Gas Lift Installations ---- Using Injection Pressure Operated Valves • By Sid Smith
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 1
API Gas Lift Design
• API RP 11V6: Recommended Practice for Design of Continuous Flow Gas Lift Installations ----Using Injection Pressure Operated Valves
• By Sid Smith
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 2
INTRODUCTIONS
PLEASE TELL US THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:
NameWork Location
Job (role)Number of Years Experience
Gas Lift Background- hands on- previous training
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 3
Design Outline• Introduction (20)• General Design (20)• Inflow & Outflow &
…….Tubing (45)• Facilities (15)
• Gas Inj. Pressure (15)• Mandrels & Valves (30)• Temperature (15)• Gas Passage (15)
• Design Methods: .Constant Rate (30) .Variable Rate (30) .Intermittent (15) .Equilibrium Curve (45)
• API Example # 1 (45)
• API Example # 2 (45)
• API Example # 3 (45)
• Summary (15)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 4
0. Introduction :API RP 11L6• RP to provide guidelines, procedures
and recommendations. See other API RP’s. (Also ISO documents)
• 1 Scope: Guidelines for continuous flow using injection pressure valves
• 2 Intent: Maximize production and . Minimize costs
• 3 Definitions• 4 General Design Considerations
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 5
S.V.
Continuous Intermittent
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 6
Typical continuous flow gas lift installation
Injection gas into wing valve and then downthe casing-tubing annulus.
Well equipped with tubing, side pocket mandrels,wireline retrievable gas lift valves and a single production packer located just above the producing zone.
Note: Upper gas lift valves closed and gas enters gas lift valve near bottom.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 7
4.1 General
• Complete system!• Combination of concepts and experience• Continuous flow gas lift has advantages
and limitations.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 8
Continuous GL Strengths• Flexible lift capacity• Handles sand OK• Deviated holes OK• Permits wire line op• Tubing fully open• High GLR beneficial• Low well R&M
• Low surface profile• Compatible /SSSV’s• Permits sounding• Easy BHP surveys• Permits PL surveys• Dual lift feasible• Tolerates bad design
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 9
Continuous GL Weakness• High back pressure imposed• Needs uninterrupted high pressure gas• Compressor expenses often high• Heading problem with low rates• Potential gas freezing & hydrate problem• Increased friction w/low gravity crude• Valve interference & high inj. point• Corrosion, Scale, & paraffin• Efficient dual lift difficult• Requires excellent data for good design
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 10
• Inject gas as deep as feasible• Conserve injection pressure• Ensure upper valves stay closed• Be able to work down to bottom• Check for ample gas passage• Plan for changes in rate• Avoid heading conditions• Minimize costs & Maximize rates
GL Design Guidelines
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 11
Types of Installations• Conventional (Tubing): Inject gas down
annulus & produce up tubing.• Annulus: Inject gas down tubing & produce
up annulus• Special: Slim-hole, Dual, Concentric, etc• Open installation: No packer or SV• Semi-closed: Packer but no SV
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 12
IPV UNLOADINGHow do we inject gas into a well in the first place?How do we inject gas into a well in the first place?
This process of replacing the completion brine with injection gas is calledunloading and it is done only once after the initial completion and after any well servicing where the casing to tubing annulus is filled with liquid.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 13
IPV UNLOADINGGas is injected into the casing - tubing annulus and the pressure pushes the brine through each of the gas lift valves which are wide open. This is a particularly dangerous time for the valves. If the differential is too high the liquid velocity can be enough to cut the valve seat. Then, the valve will not be able to close and the design will not work.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 14
IPV UNLOADINGOperators must allow sufficient time for unloading. The rule from API RP 11V5 is to take 10 minutes for each 50 psi increase in casing pressure up to 400 psig. After that point a 100 psi increase every 10 minutes is acceptable until gas injects into the tubing. To get up to 1000 psig should require at least 2 hr, 20 min. A good practice is to assign an operator to the well for the duration of this operation.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHPBrine may go out the tubing or into the reservoir.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 15
IPV UNLOADINGOnce the brine level is below the top valve, gas will enter the tubing and begin lifting the well. If the tubing pressure is less than the SBHP the reservoir will begin to contribute. The first production from the reservoir is normally recovered completion brine.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 16
IPV UNLOADINGWhen the second valve is uncovered, gas will begin to enter the tubing at the secondvalve.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 17
IPV UNLOADINGIn the case of IP valves, the injection gas rate into the well at the surface must be regulated to control the gas entry to approximately the design rate of one valve. Since two valves are passing injection gas, the pressure in the casing annulus will fall.
Gas from casing 500 mcfd
Gas tocasing 500 mcfdGas fromcasing 500 mcfd
+500
-500
-500
With more gas leaving casing than entering, the injection pressure must fall.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 18
IPV UNLOADING
When the casing pressure falls enough, the top valve will close based on valve mechanics in a good design.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 19
IPV UNLOADINGSince there is still more casing pressure than tubing pressure at the bottom valve and the bottom valve is still open, the injection gas will continue to displace the brine in the annulus until the third valve is uncovered.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 20
IPV UNLOADINGOnce again with more gas leaving the casing through two valves, the casing pressure will fall until the second valve closes. Obviously if there were more valves deeper the unloading process would continue.
Pressure
Dep
th
SBHPWhat would happen if the third valve injected too much gas?
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 21
IPV UNLOADING
Valve 1 injectingValve 1 injecting
Valve 2 injecting, 1 closesValve 2 injecting, 1 closes
Valve 3 injecting, 2 closesValve 3 injecting, 2 closes
Valve 4 (orifice) injecting, 3 closes
Valve 4 (orifice) injecting, 3 closes
Start gas to wellStart gas to well
Time
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 22
4.2 Well Performance(Inflow and Outflow)
Well Productivity: A well’s ability to produce fluids related to a reduction in
bottom hole pressure
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 23
Inflow:Pseudo-Steady-State-Radial
• Qo = C*k*h*(Pr-Pwf) . . Bo*µ*[Ln(Re/Rw)-0.75+S+Dq]
• Qo = J *(Pr-Pwf) or J = Qo/(Pr-Pwf)• Where J = PI = Productivity Index• Specific PI = J/h• C= 0.00708 bpd Oilfield Units• 1/C = 141
(After Darcy)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 24
Inflow: Flow into Well from the Reservoir• PI = Productivity Index=J (in bfpd/psi)• Note: PI for single phase flow • PI=Change in Rate/Change in Pressure• PI=Rate/(Pr-Pwf) in bfpd/psi• Rate in bfpd =Ql = PI * (Pr-Pwf)• Drawdown = ∆P=(Pr-Pwf) = Rate/PI
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 25
PI Problem # 1B
• Given: Pr = 2500 psig (172.4 bar)=Pb• Pwf = 1750 psig (120.7 bar)• Ql = 1500 BPD (238.5 m^3)• Find: PI, Qmax, &
Ql @ 500 psig (34.5 bar) & Pwf if Ql = 3000 BPD (476.9 m^3)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 26
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
PWF;
FLO
WIN
G PR
ESSU
RE (P
SIA)
OR
(kPa
)
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
Pr
Pwf
Qmax
PI = 1500/(2500-1750) = 2 bpd/psio
PI Problem # 1B when Pb= 0
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 27
It is more accurate to describe Well Productivity in terms of:
Multi-phase, radial-flow
This means it handles flow of both liquids AND gas,
which changes the curve
This method is called:
Inflow Performance Relationshipor IPR
INFLOW PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
Producing Rate (Q/Qmax) ratio
Inta
ke P
ress
ure
(Pw
f/Pr)
ratio
Vogel IPRQ=1-0.2*(Pwf/Pr)-0.8*(Pwf/Pr)̂ 2
Initial slope = -1.8
x
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 29
Inflow: Vogel IPR• Ql/Qmax=1-0.2(Pwf/Pr)-.8(Pwf/Pr)^2• Ql/Qmax=1-v*(Pwf/Pr)-(1-v)*(Pwf/Pr)^2• For multiphase flow• Need well test rate (Ql), Pr & Pwf• Find pressure ratio: Pwf/Pr• Find production ratio: Ql/Qmax =(x1)
from graph• Calculate Qmax: Qmax = Ql/(x1)• Once Qmax known, find other rates
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 30
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
PWF;
FLO
WIN
G PR
ESSU
RE (P
SIA)
OR
(kPa
)
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
x
IPR Fetkovich: Qo/Qm = [1- Pwf2 /Pr2]n n=1
Initial Slope = -2.0
Ratio 1/1000
n>.5n< 1TypicallyN=.8
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 31
Combination PI & IPR Problem• Given:• Pr = 2800 psi ; Pb = 1800 psi• Pwf = 2300 psi ; Ql1 = 500 bpd• Find: Qb, Qa, Qmax &
Ql2 @ Pwf = 900 psig• Solution: Just divide into a • PI + IPR problem
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 32
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M̂3/D)
PWF;
FLO
WIN
G P
RES
SUR
E (P
SIA
) O
R (k
Pa)
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
Pr= 2800
Pb=1800
Qmax
Pwf=2300PI = 1.0
Slope = - 1.8
For Pr > Pb)
Qb
Qa
ox
PI + IPR Vogel
Now you know how to find the well’s inflow
Use PI for single-phase flow
Use IPR for multi-phase flow
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 34
Outflow Introduction • Flow from perforations to storage tanks• Requires a good vertical flow correlation• Also a horizontal flowline correlation• Learn to use pressure-depth (gradient)
curves• Draw tbg outflow performance curves
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 35
Gas Sales
Oil
Pwf
PI or IPR Inflow
Outflow
Pr
Pwh
Psep
Inflow & Outflow Analysis
Flowline:Gradient Curves
Tubing Performance:Gradient Curves
X X
TankSTB
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 36
Outflow: Multiphase Vertical Flow• Empirical Models• Gilbert (CA oil wells)-developed 1940 to1950 but published in 1954• Poettmann & Carpenter (no slip) -1952• Baxendell & Thomas (high rate extension of P&C)-1961• Duns & Ros (lab data)-1961• Ros & Gray (improved D&R)-1964• Hagedorn & Brown (most used--slip?)-1964• Orkiszewski (Exxon composite)-1967• Beggs & Brill (incline flow)--1973• MMSM ( Moreland-Mobil-Shell-Method)-1976• Mechanistic Models $• Aziz, Grover & Fogarasi-1972• OLGA –Norwegian- 1986• Ansari. Et al. – 1990• Choksi, Schmidt & Doty-1996• Brill, et al-ongoing
Shell : Zabaras-1990
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 37
.
.
AGL_GRAD: GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVES
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
) or
(bar
)
GLR=250(44.5) 500(89) 750(134) 1000(178) 1250(223) 1500(267)
0 GLR0 GLR
g = 0.42
50% cut
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 38
Flow Regimes
Single Phase FlowBubble(y)
Plug or Piston
Slug or Churn
Annular
Mist
Above Bubble Point
Slightly below BP
Bubbles grow
Bubbles connect and expand
Oil up tubing wallwith gas at higher velocity up center
Gas with oil droplets
(Surface)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 39
Water Cut Effect on Gradient
0 35 65 95 100Water Cut (%)
γo
0.42 psi/ft
γw
As per ROS with Shell
Gradientpsi/ft
(.46+)
(.38+)
(Lab tests)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 40
Outflow: Find Pwf: Case 1• Given: Tubing ID = 1.995 inches
Rate = 800+ bpd• Cut = 50%+,GOR = 1200, GLR = 600• Pwh=440 psig, Flow Surf. Temp =100 ‘F• Well Depth = 5100’, • BH Temp = 180 ‘F, Water SG = 1.074• Oil Gravity = 35 ‘API, Gas SG = 0.65• Static BHP = 2060 psig• Find Pwf & PI (Find the correct chart)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 41
440
5100’
1560
Gradient =0.42 psi/ft
2800’
7900’
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 42
Outflow Example• Case 1: Find Pwf = 1560 psig
from 800 BPD graph• Calculate PI = Prod/Drawdown• PI = 800/(2060-1560) = 1.6 BPD/psi
• Problem B: Find Pwh for a Pwf of 1200 psig?
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 43
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
1
2
3Th
ousa
nds
PRODUCTIOPN RATE (BPD) OR (M̂ 3/D)
PW
F; F
LOW
ING
PRE
SS
URE
(PS
IA) O
R (k
Pa)
IPR TBG-1 TBG-2 TBG-3
OIL WELL INFLOW & OUTFLOW PERFORMANCEA 6000 ft flowing well with GLR = 500 and 10% WOR
Production Rate in BPD
1.995” 2.441” 2.992”
Pwf
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 44
Outflow: Summary• Essential to have a good multiphase flow
program or gradient charts• Use well test data & correlation to find Pwf• Calculate PI or IPR for each well• Construct tbg perf curves• Select most profitable tbg size• Size flowline (Typically same as tubing)• Minimize Back-pressure and Maximize Rate
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 45
Tubing Size Guideline• In both flowing & gas lift wells, the size of
tubing is critical.• Too large a size results in heading, loading
up, and unstable flow.• Too small a size results in excessive
friction and loss of production.• For best results, use the following:
1.995” ID-- 200 to 1000 bfpd 2.441” ID-- 500 to 1500 bfpd 2.992” ID-- 1000 to 3000 bfpd 3.958” ID-- > 3000 bfpd
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 46
.
0 1 2 3 4 51
2
3
4
5
Thousands
Thou
sand
s
RATE (BFPD)
Pwf:
BH F
low
ing
Tubi
ng P
ress
ure
(PSI
G)
1.995"
2.441"
2.992"
3.467"
3.958"
TUBING PERFORMANCE (OUTFLOW) CURVESFOR 10,000 FT WELL W/ 1000 GLR & 50% CUT
Typical Tubing Curves
Rate in 1000 BFPD
Pwfin
1000psi
PI’s
Pwh = 100 psig
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 47
4.4 Facilities
• John Martinez
GL Surface EquipmentAPI Manual Chapter 4
API RP 11V7
Consultant
TestingTreatingCompressionDehydrationDistributionMeteringMiscellaneous
XX
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 49
A TypicalGas LiftSystem
A TypicalGas LiftSystem
DehydratorO
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 50
GL Surface Gas Facilities (49)• GL is a system type AL; thus, all components
must operate efficiently• Freezing often a problem requiring
dehydration, heaters, or methanol injection• Most important & expensive are the
compressors. • Proper piping & good meters are essential for
accurate gas measurement • Manifolds to distribute the gas & adequate
separation/treating are also important• Plus controls--all are some of our favorite
things
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 51
Simple SystemSimple System
Inflow
Outflow
Stocktank
sales
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 52
GL Compression• Reciprocating & Centrifugal• One --economical but all eggs in one basket
Two - most practical; Three -- allows better maintenance; >3 -- too expensive
• Need high reliability (>96 %) [< 1 day/month]
• Low suction Pressure (< 100 psia)• Adequate discharge pressure !• Adequate cooling System• Good maintenance important
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 53
Piping, Distribution, Metering
• Provide good operating and maintenance plus minimize investment
• Keep back-pressure low!• Adequate separation & scrubbing• Follow good piping practices• Provide for pigging and traps• Install gas meters properly (GPSA)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 54
Choke-Regulation Control for Gas Lift Well
Meter Run
PgPio(0)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 55
4.5 Gas Injection Pressure • Has a large effect on efficiency and
operation of continuous flow GL wells• Too high a pressure results in
needless investment of compressors & lines
• Need enough pressure to inject near bottom ( 100 ft above perforations) at the planned rate.
• Request suction pressure < 100 psig• See paper by J.R. Blann, JPT Aug. 84
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 56
Depth,(ft)
Pressure (psig)
14001000600
x400 bpdx500 bpd
x600 bpd
x700 bpd
Gas Injection Pressures, psig
Equilibrium Curve
Benefit from Higher Gas Injection Pressure
0
Dw
x 200 bpd
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 57
Gas Injection Pressure• For the system, select an injection gas pressure
that will permit well gas injection just above the producing zone.
• Install pressure recorder at well and record pressure for a minimum of 24 hours. The pressure variation should be less than 100 psi.
• Use average gas injection pressure recorded at the well for gas lift design. No safety factor should be necessary.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 58
Kick-Off Injection Gas Pressure
• If available, allows deeper lift.• Normally not practicable in multi-well
installations.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 59
References/Bibliography• Clegg, JD; S.M. Bucaram; N.W. Hein Jr.:
Recommendations and Comparisons for Selecting Artificial-Lift Methods,” JPT Dec 93
• Neely, Clegg, Wilson, & Capps: “Selection of Artificial Lift Methods: A Panel Discussion,” SPE 56th Annual Fall Meeting Oct 81
• Redden, Sherman, & Blann: “Optimizing Gas-Lift Systems,” SPE 5150 , 1974
• Winkler & Smith: Camco Gas LIft Manual 1962• Brown: “The Technology of Artificial Lift Methods”• API Recommended Practices 11V8
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 60
APIMandrelSee API 11V1And ISO 17078-1
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 61
API Mandrel Selection Guideline
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 62
Gas Lift Mandrels• Conventional--Tubing Retrievable• Side-pocket--Wireline Retrievable (Oval or Round)• Connections same as tubing (avoid crossovers)• Material normally 4130• Valve Receptacle 1” or 1.5”• With Guard and Orienting Sleeve• Drift to tbg size; Fluid Passage (S) • Internal test pressure-to tbg rating• External test pressure to max collapse case• Check clearance; Min spacing 90 ft• Plastic coating (optional--Drift check after coating)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 63
4.7 Gas Lift Valves • Conventional (Tubing Retrievable)• Wireline Retrievable *• Valve size : 0.625”, 1.0” & 1.5” *• Closing Force: Gas Charged*, Spring Loaded;
Combination Spring-Gas • Valve Type: Injection Pressure Operated*;
Dummy; ...Production Pressure Operated; Pilot; Orifice; Other
• Flow Configuration: Type 1*,2, 3, or 4 • Service Class: Standard *; SCC • Reference API Spec 11V1 & ISO 17078-2
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 64
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 65
Typical Gas Lift Valves
BK-1
BK
R20
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 66
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 67
Gas Lift Valves Guidelines• Use a 3-ply bellows-- single-element, unbalanced valve
w/ a nitrogen charged dome and/or a spring• Choice between: Injection Pressure* or
Production Pressure (Fluid) Operated.• Use reverse flow (check) valve in each • Age valve and shelf test• Standard Monel Seats or Solid Carbide• Use Orifice Valve w/ check on bottom• Dummy all unused mandrels• Consider combination Gas-charged & Spring- loaded
for set pressures > 1500 psi (Field Experience)• Use screened orifice/nozzle-Venturi on bottom
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 68
Gas Lift Mandrel & Valve Summary
• Purchase mandrels as per: …………………API Spec 11V1 or ISO 17078-1
• Purchase valves as per: API Spec 11V1 or ISO 17078-2
• Follow proposed ISO 17078-3 for running, pulling, and kick-over tools, and latches
• Select suitable type valves• Check on shop to observe practices• Keep good records of performance
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 69
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 70
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
In an IPO valve, high pressure nitrogen in the dome exerts pressure on the inside of the bellows. This causes the bellows to extend down and pushes the ball on the seat.
In an IPO valve, high pressure nitrogen in the dome exerts pressure on the inside of the bellows. This causes the bellows to extend down and pushes the ball on the seat.
Nitrogen pressure
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 71
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
Gas from the casing tries to get into the valve. The pressure acts on the outside of the bellows, trying to compress the bellows.
Gas from the casing tries to get into the valve. The pressure acts on the outside of the bellows, trying to compress the bellows.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 72
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
Fluid from the production tubing tries to force the stem off the seat.
Fluid from the production tubing tries to force the stem off the seat.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 73
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
When the valve opens gas moves through the valve and out the nose.
When the valve opens gas moves through the valve and out the nose.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 74
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
The valve is in the closed position now.
What it take to get this valve open?
Let’s look first at the forces trying to close the valve.
The valve is in the closed position now.
What it take to get this valve open?
Let’s look first at the forces trying to close the valve.
AbAb
PbPb
Closing force = Pb* (Ab)
where:
Pb = nitrogen pressure
Ab = area of the bellows
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 75
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
Now the opening forces:Now the opening forces:
Opening force = Ppd (Ap) + Piod(Ab - Ap)
where:
Ppd = tubing pressure
Piod = casing pressure
Ap = port area
Ab = bellows area
ApApPpdPpd
PiodPiod
The casing pressure only acts on this area when the valve is closed.
ApAb
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 76
IPO G/L VALVE OPENING BEHAVIOR
The solutionThe solutionThe valve begins to come open when the opening and closing forces are equal.
Pb (Ab) = Ppd (Ap) + Piod(Ab - Ap)
For a given Pb we could solve for Piod the pressure at which the valve should open.
Or for a design case of Piod and Ppd, we could solve for the correct Pb.
ApApPpdPpd
PiodPiodAbAb
PbPb
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 77
Piod
Ppd
Pb
Unbalanced pressurecharged valve
Ppd=0
PbPvo
Test RackSet Pressure
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 78
Test Rack Set Pressures, Pvo • Simple Injection Pressure Operated Valve where
well forces ready to open valve: (1) Pb*Ab = Piod *(Ab-Ap) + Ppd * Ap
• For Test rack conditions where Ppd = 0: (2) Pb *Ab = Pvo * (Ab-Ap)
• Then by substitution: (3) Pvo * (Ab-Ap) = Piod *(Ab-Ap) + Ppd * Ap
• Or: (4) Pvo = Piod + Ppd *Ap/(Ab-Ap) and by• definition Ap /(Ab-Ap)=Ap/Ab/(1-Ap/Ab) = PPEF
Correct for Shop temperature for bellows charged valvePvo = [Ppd*PPEF+Piod]*Ct
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 79
TABLE A (OILFIELD UNITS)TYPICAL INJECTION PRESSURE VALVES WITH CHARGED NITROGEN BELLOWSRETRIEVABLE GAS LIFT VALVES
VALVE Ab PORT (MONEL) Ap/Ab Ap/AbOD BELLOWS SIZE SIZE RATIO (1-Ap/Ab)(IN) (IN^2) (IN) (1/64") Mfg PPEF
------- ------- ------- ------- (MONEL) (MONEL)1.5 0.77 0.1875 12 0.0380 0.0395
0.77 0.2500 16 0.0670 0.0718 0.77 0.3125 20 0.1040 0.1161 0.77 0.3750 24 0.1480 0.1737 0.77 0.4375 28 0.2010 0.2516 0.77 0.5000 32 0.2620 0.3550
1.0 0.31 0.1250 8 0.0430 0.0449 0.31 0.1875 12 0.0940 0.1038 0.31 0.2500 16 0.1640 0.1962 0.31 0.2813 18 0.2070 0.2610 0.31 0.3125 20 0.2550 0.3423 0.31 0.3750 24 0.3650 0.5748
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 80
Test Rack Set Pressure: Example
• Given: XXXXX 1-inch BK valve w/ 3/16” port w/monel seat. Find PPEF = 0.1038 (mfg. data)
• Pio=Csg pressure @ valve depth=1060 psig• Ppd =Tbg pressure @ depth = 420 psig • Tv = Valve Temp @ depth = 121 ‘F• Tshop = 60 ‘F (Valve temp in shop)• Find from Table 4-1 that Ct = 0.88• Thus: Pvo = [PPEF*Ppd+Pio]*Ct• Pvo = [0.1038*420+1060]*0.880= 971 psig
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 81
Well Name: Examplejoe PRESSURE (Pv) 1000 PSIATEMPERATURE COR. FACTORS TEMP.in Shop (Ts) 60 'F
(F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct)61 0.998 101 0.916 141 0.847 181 0.787 221 0.735 261 0.69062 0.996 102 0.914 142 0.845 182 0.786 222 0.734 262 0.68963 0.993 103 0.912 143 0.843 183 0.784 223 0.733 263 0.68864 0.991 104 0.910 144 0.842 184 0.783 224 0.732 264 0.68765 0.989 105 0.909 145 0.840 185 0.781 225 0.730 265 0.686
66 0.987 106 0.907 146 0.839 186 0.780 226 0.729 266 0.68567 0.985 107 0.905 147 0.837 187 0.779 227 0.728 267 0.68368 0.982 108 0.903 148 0.836 188 0.777 228 0.727 268 0.68269 0.980 109 0.901 149 0.834 189 0.776 229 0.726 269 0.68170 0.978 110 0.899 150 0.832 190 0.775 230 0.724 270 0.680
71 0.976 111 0.898 151 0.831 191 0.773 231 0.723 271 0.67972 0.974 112 0.896 152 0.829 192 0.772 232 0.722 272 0.67873 0.972 113 0.894 153 0.828 193 0.771 233 0.721 273 0.67774 0.970 114 0.892 154 0.826 194 0.769 234 0.720 274 0.67675 0.968 115 0.890 155 0.825 195 0.768 235 0.719 275 0.675
76 0.965 116 0.889 156 0.823 196 0.767 236 0.717 276 0.67477 0.963 117 0.887 157 0.822 197 0.765 237 0.716 277 0.67378 0.961 118 0.885 158 0.820 198 0.764 238 0.715 278 0.67279 0.959 119 0.883 159 0.819 199 0.763 239 0.714 279 0.67180 0.957 120 0.882 160 0.817 200 0.761 240 0.713 280 0.670
81 0.955 121 0.880 161 0.816 201 0.760 241 0.712 281 0.66982 0.953 122 0.878 162 0.814 202 0.759 242 0.711 282 0.66883 0.951 123 0.876 163 0.813 203 0.758 243 0.710 283 0.66784 0.949 124 0.875 164 0.811 204 0.756 244 0.708 284 0.66685 0.947 125 0.873 165 0.810 205 0.755 245 0.707 285 0.665
86 0.945 126 0.871 166 0.808 206 0.754 246 0.706 286 0.66487 0.943 127 0.870 167 0.807 207 0.753 247 0.705 287 0.66388 0.941 128 0.868 168 0.805 208 0.751 248 0.704 288 0.66289 0.939 129 0.866 169 0.804 209 0.750 249 0.703 289 0.66190 0.937 130 0.865 170 0.803 210 0.749 250 0.702 290 0.660
91 0.935 131 0.863 171 0.801 211 0.747 251 0.701 291 0.65992 0.933 132 0.861 172 0.800 212 0.746 252 0.700 292 0.65893 0.931 133 0.860 173 0.798 213 0.745 253 0.698 293 0.65794 0.929 134 0.858 174 0.797 214 0.744 254 0.697 294 0.65695 0.927 135 0.856 175 0.795 215 0.743 255 0.696 295 0.655
96 0.925 136 0.855 176 0.794 216 0.741 256 0.695 296 0.65497 0.924 137 0.853 177 0.793 217 0.740 257 0.694 297 0.65498 0.922 138 0.851 178 0.791 218 0.739 258 0.693 298 0.65399 0.920 139 0.850 179 0.790 219 0.738 259 0.692 299 0.652
100 0.918 140 0.848 180 0.788 220 0.736 260 0.691 300 0.651(F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct)
API Gas Lift ManualTable 4.1
Temperature Correctionfor
Nitrogen Charged Bellows
1000 psia & 60 ‘F
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 82
Table 4-1 Page 40 (Program CT_TEMP)Temperature Correction Factors for Nitrogen
• Based of 60 F’ and Pbv = 1000 psig• ‘F Ct• 121 .880• Where: Ct =1/[1.0+ (Tv(n)-60) x M/Pbv]• For Pbv<1238 psia :
M=3.054xPbv^2/10000000+1.934xPbv/1000-2.26/1000• For Pbv> 1238 psia :
M=1.804xPbv^2/10000000+2.298xPbv/1000-2.67/10
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 83
AGL_SET:INJECTION PRESSURE VALVE DESIGNExample
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
DEPTH (ft) of (meters)
PRES
SUR
E (p
si) o
r (ba
r)
INJ GAS TBG Temp VALVE SPACING
420
1060
121o 150 o
: Pvo1= ?Calculate Valve Set Pressures
121 135
145
Gg=.03
Gf=.15
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 84
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 85
4.10 Temperature
• Determine Surface Static and …………...Reservoir Static Temperatures
• Calculate Static Gradient• Measure Flowing Temperature for
different rates• Never use static for design basis• Design on estimated production rate
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 86
AGL_TEMP: FLOWING TEMPERATURE PROFILE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
TEM
PERA
TURE
('F)
of
('C)
STATIC TEMP FLOW TEMP
Static
Flowing
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 87
Temperature• The surface and bottom hole temperatures
are relatively constant in a given field but change through-out the world
• The field static temperature gradient should be known or measured as well as the reservoir temperature from well logs
• Field data when available is best but the flowing temperature can be calculated
• Normally a linear temperature increase approach with depth is adequate
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 88
IsothermalGradient Map
1.2
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 89
• Example:Ql =2250 bpd through 3.5” Tbg• Well Depth = 5500’ , BHT = 180 ‘F• Geothermal Gradient =
(180-75)/(5500/100) =1.9 ‘F/100’• Solution: intersection of 2250/1.5 =
1500 bpd & 1.9 GG find flow GG = 1.0 ‘F/100’
• Flowing Surf Temperature = 180 - 1.0*5500/100 = 125 ‘F
Kirkpatrick Correlation
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 90
Fig. 6-9 KirkpatrickFig 6-9 KirkpatrickChart to be used directly for 2.5” tubing
For 2” tubing, multiply rate by 2For 3” tubing, divide by 1.5
1.9
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 91
Temp Computer Program Solution
• “Predicting Temperature Profiles in a Flowing Well,” by Sagar, Doty & Schmidt
• Also for gas lift wells• For multi-phase flow: Regression
analysis--- many assumptions• Check against real field data
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 92
(OILFIELD = E; METRIC = M)E or MEUnit Selection15
mcfd0 Qi:Gas Lift Inj. Rate14
'F125 Twh =Flowingft*0 Di: Depth of Gas Inj.*13
-0.0043 SGM2:CORRECTION ft5,500 Dw: Total Well Depth12
-0.0043 SGM1:CORRECTIONin7.000 CSG: Casing OD11
1.00E-04 A2: COEf.in3.500 OD: Tubing OD10
1.21E-04 A1: COEF.air=10.700 SGi: SG Gas (Air = 1)9
#N/AU2:HEAT t.c.sp.gr.1.060 SGw: SG. Water8
121.22 U1:HEAT t.c.'API40.0 API: Oil Weight7
lbm/sec8.23 Wt2:MASS FLOW mcfd750 Qg:Form. Gas Rate6
lbm/sec8.23 Wt1:MASS FLOW bwpd250 Qw:Water Rate5
sp.gr.0.825 SGo: OIL wt.bopd2000 Qo:Oil Rate4
't2.306 f:DIM.TIME'F180 Tf:Temp of Formation3
BTU/lbm0.542 Cpl:SPEC. HEAT 'F75 Ts: Temp.Surf.Static2
'F/100'1.909 Tg:TEMP GRADpsi100 Pwh: Wellhead Pressure1
--CALCULATIONS----INPUT DATA---
VERSION 8.0dbFlowing Temperature ExampleWell Name
(C) COPYRIGHT 2003**PREDICTING TEMPERATURE PROFILES**14-Aug-06
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 93
Temperature data• API Gas Lift Manual & API RP11V6• C.V. Kirkpatrick “The Power of Gas”• K.E. Brown “The Technology of Artificial
Lift Methods,” Volume 2a• Sagar, Doty & Schmidt, “Flowing
Temperature Profiles in a Flowing Well”• Winkler & Eads, “Algorithm for more accurately
predicting nitrogen-charged gas lift valve operations at high pressures and temperatures”
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 94
4.12 Gas Passage• Use the minimum size port (choke) that
will pass the desired rate of gas!• Check Valve Port size for amount of gas
passage that is possible• Use Thornhill-Craver Equation/Chart• Make Gas Gravity & Temp Correction• Predict on high side• Use next higher standard port/orifice
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 95
Upstream:Piod
SGg=
Tv =
Pb
port
Ppd
square-edgeorifice
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 96
Thornhill-Craver Chart: Example• Find corrected gas throughput (Qgi)• Given: Upstream Pressure (Piod)=1000 psig• Downstream Pressure (Ppd)= 790 psig• Orifice Size (Valve Port) = 12/64”• Temperature of valve = 160 ‘F• Gas SG = 0.75• Find from chart : Qgi = 660 MCFD• From Correction Chart find: Cc = 1.17• Actual Qgi = 660/1.17 = 564 MCFD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 97
Choke Chart660
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 98Cc=
x
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 99
Orifice/Choke Problems
• Orifice/Choke Problem # 1• Upstream Pressure = 1250 psig• Downstream Pressure = 1150 psig• Valve Port Size = 8/64 inch• GG = 0.7 & Temp @ Depth = 180 ‘F• How much gas can be Injected?• What size orifice for Injection GAS Volume
of 850 MCFD?
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 100
Constant Injection Pressure Test of Gas Lift Valve
See API RP 11V2
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 101
Typical VPC Gas-Lift Valve Performance PlotFig. 1
Camco BK with12/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with16/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with20/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Flow
rate
- (M
scf/d
)
Downstream Pressure - (psig)
0
500
1000
1500
0 200 400 600 800 1000
(after Decker & Dunham)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 102
Comparison of Gas-Lift Valve Performance Based on VPC ModelVs. Performance Based on Thornhill-Craver Model
Fig. 2
Camco BK with12/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with12/64thsThornhillPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Flow
rate
- (M
scf/d
)
Downstream Pressure - (psig)
0
200
400
600
800
0 200 400 600 800 1000 APIPvo(n) = Test rack opening
pressure for nth valvePcf = Injection gas pressure
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 103
Nozzle-VenturiGas Lift Valve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 104
GasInjectionRate
Production Pressure
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 105
Production Pressure
P ~ TubingPressure
The pressure down-stream of ball is nearly equal to the tubing (production) pressure.
Injection Pressure > P> Tubing pressure
Injection Pressure. This pressure is greater than the pressure downstream of the ball.
Large pressuredrop, largesuction force onball, small gapbetween balland seat
The gas injection rate through the valve is reduced as the valve throttles closed.
Pressures Acting on anPressures Acting on anUnchoked ValveUnchoked Valve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 106
P ~ TubingPressure
P ~ TubingPressure
The pressure down-stream of the ball is held higher by the choke.
Injection Pressure
Small pressuredrop, smallsuction force onball, more gapbetween balland seat
Largepressuredrop
The gas injection rate through the valve is higher because the valve ball is held off of the seat by the higher pressure beneath the ball.
Choke
Pressures Acting on aPressures Acting on aChoked ValveChoked Valve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 107
Plot of Injection Rate vs. PressureUnloading Gas-Lift Valve with Choke vs. Valve with no Choke
Using Gas-Lift Valve/Choke Model
Macco R-1D3/16" port10/64" chokePc = 1200 psiPt = 325 psi
Note that choked valve remainsopen over entire range andactually transmits much more gas.It "snaps" closed when closingpressure is reached.
Choked
Unchoked
Comparison Between Choked and Unchoked Valves
(After Dunham, Decker, & Waring)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 108
4.9 Design Methods• Need to space mandrel/valves to permit working to the
lowest possible depth• Find the location of the first valve• Injection Pressure Operated Valves • (1) Constant Rate Design• (2) Variable Rate Design • (3) Intermittent Design*• (4) Equilibrium Curve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 109
Graphical Solution--Gas Lift Spacing.........................
• Need to space mandrel/valves to permit working to the lowest possible depth
• You will learn to space using different techniques--depending on type valve
• Find the location of the first valve• Injection Pressure Operated Valves • (1) Constant Rate Design*• (2) Variable Rate Design • (3) Intermittent Design: Other Designs
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 110
1st Mandrel/Valve...................................• Depth of 1st Valve is the same for most designs• Strictly a U-tube case where the outlet and inlet
pressures are nearly balanced• Outlet Po. = Pwh+Depth(1)*[Liquid Grad (Gs)]
Inlet Pi. = Pg + Gg * Depth(1) -Psf• Example: Pwh = 100 psig,
Gs= .465 psi/ft, Pg = 1000 psig, • Gg = .03 psi/ft, Psf = 20 psi or about 50’(min)• 100+D(1)*.465=1000+.03*D(1)-20• D(1) = [1000-100-20]/[.465-.03] = 2023 ft
.
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 15000
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.1
Pg, Surface Gas Injection Pressure, psig
Gas
Gra
dien
t, ps
i/ft SGg 0.6
SGg 0.7
SGg 0.8
SGg 0.9
Injection Gas GradientFor Ts= 75 'F & Tf = 175 'F
API GL ManualPage 44 Fig. 4.7
x
Pgd=Pg x e(0.1875xGxD/(TaxZ)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 112
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0200400600800
1000120014001600180020002200240026002800
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Gs = 0.465
Gg = 0.03Pio
Pwh
Gf = 0.1
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 113
Exception to depth of 1st Valve
• In most cases the depth of the 1st valve is as outlined.
• But for relatively deep, high PI wells with low injection pressures, the depth of first valve can be placed at the static fluid level. After any workover where the well is loaded with SW, it may be necessary to swab the fluid level to the normal fluid level.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 114
SGiTgs Twh
Injection PressureValveWorksheet
Psep
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 115
Constant Rate Design:for Injection Pressure Operated Valve with good well data
• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line (Pgd) & Grad. • Find location of 1st Valve• Select desired rate • Select two points (Dw1 & Dw2) from gradient
curve for desired rate. Plot gradient curve for desired rate on graph paper.
• Use unloading gradient to find intersection with Pgd. Move back up-hole to achieve necessary PD.
• This is depth of 2nd Valve.• Repeat until Dw is reached or min space
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 116
Constant Rate Design Problem• Pg = 1200 psig; SGg = .65; Gg = 0.033 psi/ft• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Pwh = 100 psig; Psep = 50 psi;Dw=8000’• Max rate = 600 bpd; Cut 50 %; 35 API; • Tgs = 75 ‘F; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf = 180 ‘F (650 psi @ 4000’)• Tbg = 1.995” ID; GLR = 1000; (1300 psi @ 8000’ )• Min Space = 500’; PD = 20 psi• Solution: Use program or gradient curves to find pressures @
depth for desired rate. Draw Ppd(1)…Ppd(n)• Find 1st Valve @ about 2600’ w/ Ppd(1) = 445 psig• Extend .465 psi/ft gradient to Pgd. Move back up-hole until
a 20 psi PD results. D(2) = about 4450’• Continue until 500’ min spacing reached.• Find operating valve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 117
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SUR
E (p
si)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
1464
1200
x
x
Constant Rate Design
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 118
WELL NAME: WS-Space for Constant RateD(n) Ppd(n) Pio(n) Piod(n) Tv CT Pvo(n) Qgi
DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T-R INJ GAS ft psi psi psi 'F - psi mscfd
(INPUT) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------0 100 1200 1200 100 - -
2600 442 1200 1284 126 0.869 1156 9154450 721 1180 1323 145 0.838 1171 9285750 935 1160 1343 158 0.817 1176 8846625 1087 1140 1347 166 0.804 1173 7687150 1181 1120 1340 172 0.796 1164 6287550 1254 1100 1329 176 0.790 1153 4447950 1329 1080 1317 180 0.785 1142 #N/A
¼” S.O.Dummy
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 119
A. Mandrel Spacing: Constant Rate for injection pressure valves
• Given: Pwh=Psep =100 psig; Pg = 1400 psig• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Twh = 120 F’; Tf=200 ‘F• SGi = 0.7; Dw= 10000’; Dmin = 500’• PD = 25 psi; Tubing = 3.5” OD• Max rate = 2000 bpd @ max depth• Total Rgl = 1000 CF/B• Space mandrels & find max injection depth
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 120
GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVESFOR 2.992" ID TUBING & 1000 GLR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (FEET)
FLO
WIN
G T
BG P
RE
SSUR
E (P
SIG
)
3000 bpd
2500 bpd
2000 bpd
1500 bpd1000 bpd500 bpd
Gradient = 0.465 psi/ft
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 121
0 0.000 200 #N/A0.0 1840 10000 Dw
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A12
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A11
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A10
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A9
1626 1184 #N/A1307 0.750 200 1612 12251828 9950 8
1632 1210 #N/A1320 0.754 196 1626 12501720 9500 7
1634 1235 573 1331 0.760 192 1637 12751603 9000 6
1637 1259 1189 1342 0.765 188 1647 13001490 8500 5
1637 1283 1520 1352 0.771 184 1656 13251374 7973 4
1610 1301 1806 1351 0.783 176 1642 13501164 6965 3
1550 1313 1894 1335 0.803 163 1600 1375853 5331 2
1455 1323 1834 1302 0.835 144 1526 1400472 2980 1
--120 1400 1400100 0
----------------------------------------------------------------(INPUT)
psipsimscfdpsi-'Fpsipsipsift
@ depthSurf closeINJ GAST-RTEMP@ VALVEV openSURFTBG PRES DEPTHNO.
V closePvc(n)QgiPvo(n)CTTvPiod(n)Pio(n)Ppd(n)D(n)
Pvcd(n)Constant Rate Problem AWELL NAME:
S.O.DD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 122
Variable Gradient Design for limited data
• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line (Pgd)• Draw Upper Design Line (UDL) {Pgd-Pwh}• Find location of 1st valve @ D(1). (Same approach)• Calculate Pseudo Tbg Pressure@ surface:
Ps = Pwh + 0.2 *(Pg-Pwh)• Find Ppd(n) at total depth or total injection depth:
Note: (Ppd(n) < Pgd-200 psi)• Connect these two points: Lower Design Line (LDL)• Find intersection of LDL @ D(1): Extend using
unloading gradient to intersection w/ Pig (UDL). No pressure adjustment necessary. Locate D(2)
• Continue spacing until Dw reached or Min Space
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 123
Variable Rate Design Problem• Pg = 1200 psig; SGg = .65; Gg = 0.033 psi/ft• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Pwh = 100 psig; Psep = 50 psi;Dw=8000’• Rate = 200-600 bpd; Cut 50 %; 35 ‘API• Tgs = 75 ‘F; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf = 180 ‘F• Tbg = 1.995” ID; GLR = 1000;• Min Space = 500’• Calculate Pseudo Tbg Pressure@ surface:
Ps = Pwh + 0.2 *(Pg-Pwh)= 100 + 0.2 (1200-100) = 320 psig• Find Ppd(n) at total depth or total injection depth: • Ppd(n) = 1200 + .033x8000 -200 =1264 psig @ 8000’ [max] • Connect these two points: Lower Design Line (LDL)• Find D(1) {Same approach as before}• Find intersection of LDL...Ppd(1) @ D(1): Extend using unloading
gradient to intersection w/ Pig (UDL). Locate D(2), D(3)….D(n)• Continue spacing until Dw reached or Min Space
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Variable RateInjection Pressure Valves
320
1264
Bellows Injection Pressure Operated Valves
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Variable RateProducing Pressure (Fluid) Valves
Spring Production Pressure Operated Valves
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 126
Intermittent Design
• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line, Pgd:UDL• Find location of 1st Valve. • Select design rate -Use small ported unloading valves• Find Int. Spacing Factor (Fs):
API GLM - Page 106, Fig 8-4 • Pdp(n) =Fs*Dw+Pwh; Connect Pwh & Pdp(n): LDL• From intersection of LDL & D(1) extend unloading
gradient (Sg) to UDL. Move back up-hole until the PD is reached. This is location of D(2). Find D(3)...
• Continue same procedure until Dw reached.• Select large ported or pilot operating valve
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 127
Intermittent Spacing Example• Well Depth = 8000’• Pressure of injection Gas = 1000 psig• Injection Gas Gravity = 0.60• Sep. pres =50 psig & Flow TP=100 psig• Planned Production Rate = 400 BPD• Kill Fluid Gradient = 0.465 psi/ft• Tubing OD = 2 3/8” & Casing OD = 7”• Valve DP = 20 psig: Space Valves
0 100 200 300 400 5000.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Rate in BPD
Spac
ing
Fact
or (S
F) in
psi
/ft 1.61"ID
1.995"ID
2.441"ID
2.992"ID
Intermittent Gas LiftSpacing Factors Fig. 8.4
o
oo
Intermittent Gas Lift
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 129
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0100200300400500600700800900
100011001200130014001500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Intermittent Lift Spacing
Spacing Factor = .1
1192
100 +8000x.1
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 130
Mandrel Spacing Summary• You have learned methods for
spacing valves: • (2)Constant Rate for Injection Pressure Valves;
(3) Variable Gradient for Inj. & Prod. Pressure Valves; (4) Intermittent design for Inj. Pressure Valves.
• Good spacing is essential for good operation & being able to work down to the lowest possible valve
• Plan ahead for changing conditions.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 131
B. Mandrel Spacing: Variable Gradient for injection pressure operated Valves
Given: Psep = 100 psig; Pg = 1400 psigGs = 0.465 psi/ft; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf=160 ‘FSGi = 0.65; Dw= 7000’; Dmin = 500’PD = 25 psi; Tubing = 3.5” ODRate ? = 1500+ bpd from 7000’+Total Rgl = 750 CF/B Calculate Pseudo Tubing PressureSpace mandrels & find max injection depth
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 132
C. Mandrel Spacing: Intermittent Gas Lift. for injection pressure valves
Given: Psep= 50 psig; Pwh = 50 psig; Pg = 800 psigGs = 0.465 psi/ft; Tgs=75’F;Twh =100‘F; Tf=150‘FSGi = 0.70; Dw= 7,000’ ; Gg = 0.024 psi/ftPD = 25 psi; Tubing = 2.875” ODRate = 200 bpd from 7,000’Use intermittent lift spacing factors for LDL (.055)Space mandrels
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 133
Equilibrium Curve• Definition: A curve that connects the intersection of the
natural flowing gradients with the gas lift producing gradients.
• Draw graph of Pressure Vs Depths. Plot upper flowing gradient curves for selected rates for GL conditions.
• Find from PI or IPR various Pwf’s for different rates at total depth.
• Draw the lower gradient curves and find the intersection with the appropriate upper gradient curve
• Maximum production rate will be about 200 psi less than the gas injection pressure.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 134
Gf 0.42 psi/ft
120 ‘F
GasLiftManual
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 135
PrPwf
o
E.C.
Upper Gradient Curves (Trace)
Lower Gradient Curves(0.42 psi/ft above BP)
200
200 bpd200 bpd
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 136
E.C.
After Jack Blann
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 137
Equilibrium Curve Problem• Find the rate and the lift depth for the following
planned gas lift well:• Well Depth = 10,000’; Tubing size = 3.5” OD• Gas Injection Pressure = 1400 psig; Pwh = 100 psig• Temp @ Surface = 75 F’; BH Temp = 200 F’• Pr= 3000 psig; Pb = 500 psig• PI = 2.0• Lower flowing gradient = 0.42 psi/ft (if Pwf > Pb)• Planned GLR = 1000 during gas lift
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 138
GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVESFOR 2.992" ID TUBING & 1000 GLR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
DEPTH (FEET)
FLO
WIN
G T
BG
P
RE
SS
UR
E (P
SIG
)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 139
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SUR
E (p
si) o
r (ba
r)
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GAS INJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 140
5. Continuous Flow ProblemsAPI RP 11V6
• 5.1 Example Problem No. 1• 5.2 Example Problem No. 2• 5.3 Example Problem No. 3
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 141
5. API RP 11V6: Injection Pressure Operated Valves:Example Problem No. 1:
Typical Well with Good Data• Pwh = 100 psig• Pg = 1250-1200 psig• Ts = 78 ‘F• Twh = 108 ‘F• Tf = 178 ‘F• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft• Dw = 8000 ft.• Pgd at Dw = 1440 psig• Water Cut 50%• Pr = PB* = 2125 psig
• Rgo = 700 & Rgl = 350• Psp = 75 psig• Sgi = 0.6 (.65)• Pl1 = 400 psig @ 2500’• Pl2 = 880 psig @ 6000’• PD = 25 psig• Dmin = 250’• Tbg. = 2.441” ID• Valve = 1” w/3/16” port• Rate = 200 BPD @ 1941 psig
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 142
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
PWF;
FLO
WIN
G PR
ESSU
RE (P
SIA)
OR
(kPa
)
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
API RP 11V6: Example # 1
PI = 1000/1000 =1.0
1941 psig
1125 psi
Pr=2125 psig
Qmax = 1325
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 143
1442 8000
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.145 5730 953 1000 10
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.139 5343 1116 900 9
OK1431 1108 7634 0.132 4997 1261 800 8
OK1412 980 7015 0.126 4681 1394 700 7
OK1395 868 6455 0.119 4388 1517 600 6
OK1380 769 5945 0.113 4115 1632 500 5
OK1366 681 5477 0.106 3857 1740 400 4
OK1353 602 5045 0.100 3612 1843 300 3
OK1340 532 4645 0.093 3379 1941 200 2
OK1329 470 4273 0.087 3155 2035 100 1
1200 100 0 0.080 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwfRATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRESSUR
E (p
si) o
r
(bar
)
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GAS INJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 144
Optimum Injection Gas
• Use the available injection gas to make the most oil production and greatest profit
• Split the gas between wells to achieve such results
• However; installation of additional compressors to achieve max rate seldom justified! {Parkinson’s Gas Law}
• Experience: Maximum profit @ about 50% of max injection to achieve max rate
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 145
.
0 1 2 3 4 5500
1000
1500
2000
2500
ThousandsTotal Gas (Formation+Injection) in MCFD
Pt: T
ubin
g Pr
essu
re @
500
0 ft
in P
SIG
Gas Lift PerformanceFor 2.992"Tbg & 2000 BPD
Excessive GasOpti-mumGas
@ 5000’
Max Rate
Excessive Gas
InsufficientGas
MMCFD
Typical
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 146
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Thousands
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
) or (
bar)
GLR=250(44.5) 500(89) 750(134)1000(178) 1250(223) 1500(267)
AGL_GRAD: GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVES EXAMPLE FOR 1000 BPD UP 2.875" OD TUBING
0
1000
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 147
BOPD
Gas Injection Rate in MCFD
Max Oil Rate
Max OCI
Max Profit
TYPICAL CASE
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 148
Plot
Plot IPRand SelectedGLROutflowCurves
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 149
5.1.6 Injection Gas Required @ Depth
• For a production rate of 800 BFPDFor a Rgl of : (Correction Factor @ 178 ‘F & Gg of .65 = 1.11)
1500: (1500x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 920 x1.11= 1021 MCFD
1200: (1200x800 - 350x800)/1000 = 680 x1.11= 755 MCFD
1000: (1000x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 520 x1.11=577 MCFD
800: (800x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 360 x1.11=400 MCFD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 150
AGL_TEMP: FLOWING TEMPERATURE PROFILE
050
100150200250300
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
TEM
PERA
TURE
'F
of 'C
STATIC TEMP FLOW TEMP
Tf=178 ‘F
Ts = 78 ‘F
Twh= 108 ‘F
5.1.7 Temperature
.
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 15000
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.1
Pg, Surface Gas Injection Pressure, psig
Gas
Gra
dien
t, ps
i/ft SGg 0.6
SGg 0.7
SGg 0.8
SGg 0.9
Injection Gas GradientFor Ts= 75 'F & Tf = 175 'F
API GL ManualPage 44 Fig. 4.7
Pgd=Pg x e(0.1875xGxD/(TaxZ)
o
5.1.8 Gas Gradient
o
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 152
5.1.10 Valve Setting Depths• First Valve Setting Depth• Tubing pressure = casing pressure – Psf• Max unloading flowing pressure = .
gas injection pressure- Psf• Pwh + gs x D(1) = Pg + gg x D(1) – Psf• 100+0.465 x D(1)= 1200+ .03xD(1) -20• (.465-.03)xD(1) = 1200-100-20=1080• D(1) = 1080/.435 = 2483 ft • Adjusted D(1) = 2475 ft (close as you can read chart)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 153
0.42
2325x
o
o
0.465
.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 154
5.1.12 Subsequent Valve Setting Depths
• Ppd(n)+gsxDbv=(pg-nxPD)+ ggx(D(n)+Dbv-Psf • For valve(2)• 400+.465xDbv=(Pg-25)+.03x(2483+Dvb)-20• Dbv =1907 ft• D(2) = 2483+1907 = 4390 ft about 4375 ft• D(3) = 5797 about 5800 ft (as close as can read chart) • D(4) = 6783 about 6775 ft• D(5) = 7434 about 7425 ft• D(6) = 7820 Adjustment to 7690 ft (half-way between D(5) & D(7)
• D(7) = 8000+ Adjustment to 7940 ft (30 ft above packer)
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 155
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 156
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0200
400600
80010001200
1400
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SURE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
API RP 11V6: Example # 1
0.465
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 157
5.1.14 Valve Selection
• In this case, one-inch, unbalanced, nitrogen-charged bellows valves without a spring was selected. (A common practice in some areas.)
Piod
Ppd
Pb
Port Size = ?
PPEF = ?
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 158
755 Thornhill-Craver Equation
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 159
I” Inj. Pressure w/ 12/64” port
2475’ 130 .104 400 42 1275 1317 .869 1144
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 160
WELL NAME: API RP 11V6: Example # 1D(n) Ppd(n) Pio(n) Piod(n) Tv CT Pvo(n) Qgi
NO. DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T-R INJ GAS ft psi psi psi 'F - psi mscfd
(INPUT) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 0 100 1200 1200 108 - - 1 2475 397 1200 1273 130 0.863 1134 9312 4375 648 1175 1302 146 0.835 1143 9403 5800 851 1150 1315 159 0.815 1145 9194 6775 996 1125 1315 167 0.803 1138 8325 7425 1095 1100 1304 173 0.795 1126 7096 7690 1137 1075 1282 175 0.792 1108 6047 7940 1176 1050 1258 177 0.789 1089 46514/64” SO
Summary: Table 2 – Test Rack Pressure Calculation--Modified
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 161
5.1.16 Summary for Example Problem No. 1
• Predicted rate of about 800 BFPD• Lift from Screened Orifice near bottom• Gas injection rate of about 680(755) MCFD• Flowing surface temperature of about 108 “F• Anticipated operating surface gas injection of 1075 psig• After installation, production tests should be run to optimize
production and injection gas rates.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 162
.
• .
*•*max=7100x.465=
3300 psig160
**Pi from 0.1 to 1.0 bpd/psiMin PI = 0.1Av. PI = 0.4Max PI = 1.0
Note: 2 3/8 inch tbg
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 163
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 164
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.100 5247 778 250 4
OK1028 588 5405 0.094 4005 1300 200 3
OK990 415 3801 0.088 2814 1800 150 2
OK953 265 2254 0.082 1624 2300 100 1
900 80 0 0.070 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwfRATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
API Example 2: Assume PI = 0.1 bpd/psi
7000 700 1060
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 165
NO1064 1232 6937 0.166 4005 1300 800 7
NO1035 955 5684 0.154 3410 1550 700 6
OK1008 725 4540 0.142 2814 1800 600 5
OK983 534 3490 0.130 2219 2050 500 4
OK960 378 2523 0.118 1624 2300 400 3
OK939 253 1631 0.106 1029 2550 300 2
OK919 156 804 0.094 433 2800 200 1
900 80 0 0.070 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwfRATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
API Example 2: Assume PI = 200/500=0.4 bpd/psi & Pr = 3300 psi
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 166
1068 7100
NO1011 1079 4670 0.214 2100 2100 1200 10
OK994 879 3954 0.202 1862 2200 1100 9
OK979 709 3313 0.190 1624 2300 1000 8
OK965 567 2736 0.178 1386 2400 900 7
OK952 447 2213 0.166 1148 2500 800 6
OK941 347 1737 0.154 910 2600 700 5
OK931 265 1302 0.142 671 2700 600 4
OK921 197 903 0.130 433 2800 500 3
OK913 143 536 0.118 195 2900 400 2
OK905 101 197 0.106 0 3000 300 1
900 80 0 0.070 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwfRATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUIDAPI Example 2: PI = 1 bpd/psi
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 167
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRE
SSU
RE (p
si) o
r (ba
r)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
API Example 2: Variable Gradient Design
Pg= 900 psi
1060
860
Pwh’= 160+.2x(900-160)=308 psi
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 168
Pwh= .2x(900-160)+160
Min. Spacing = 200 ft
1060860
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 169
853 687 #N/A711 0.802 173 853 720866 7000
854 711 358 722 0.813 165 857 740780 6047
872 734 429 739 0.815 163 876 760762 5847
889 756 489 755 0.818 161 894 780742 5610
903 778 543 771 0.822 159 910 800713 5281
914 799 589 786 0.827 155 923 820676 4846
922 820 628 799 0.834 151 934 840630 4290
926 841 654 811 0.842 145 940 860574 3599
926 861 665 821 0.853 138 943 880507 2757
921 880 668 830 0.867 130 940 900432 1753
--115 900 900308 0
----------------------------------------------------------------(INPUT)
psipsimscfdpsi-'Fpsipsipsift
@ depthSurf closeINJ GAST-RTEMP@ VALVEV openSURFTBG PRES DEPTH
V closePvc(n)QgiPvo(n)CTTvPiod(n)Pio(n)Ppd(n)D(n)
Pvcd(n)Example #2WELL NAME:
DummyDummy
¼” s. orifice
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 170
AGL_SET:INJECTION PRESSURE VALVE DESIGNExample
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) of (meters)
PRE
SS
URE
(psi
) or (
bar)
INJ GAS TBG Temp VALVE SPACING
No. 2API
Pwf
Pr = 3300 psi
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 171
A.Summary: Problem # 2• The design results are for Injection Pressure
Operated Valves.• This spacing is too wide for Production
Pressure Operated (PPO) Valves.• For PPO Valves, the top of the design line
should be based on 30 or 40% of the difference between Pio1 and Pwh.
• The resulting closer spacing permits the uppermost PPO Valves to close as unloading progresses deeper in the well.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 172
B.Summary: Problem # 2
• Original mandrel spacing for new wells must be carefully thought out.
• When little or no well productivity info is available, mandrel spacing should be closer, mainly in the upper part of the string.
• Mandrel spacing must be sufficient to last for the lifetime of the completion.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 173
C.Summary: Problem # 2
• Flexible design from 250 to 1100 BFPD• Minimum of 10 mandrels • “Valve” to lift from near total depth • Drop injection pressure 20 psi on each
lower valve to deter multi-point injection• Use ¼-inch screened orifice on bottom
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 174
API RP 11V6: 5.3 Example No. 3 - Fixed MandrelUsing Injection Pressure Operated Valves
• Pr = Pws = 3350 psig• Pb = 1500; (Standing)• Test Rate = 200 BFPD• Pwh = 120 psig• API Oil = 35o; GOR = 400• Cut = 50 %:Water
SG=1.074• Tbg = 1.995” ID• Dw=8000’TVD/9936’MD• Pwf = 2550 psig (Fig 21)• Ts = 74 ‘F• Tf = 180 ‘F
• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft• Pg = 1150 to 1250 psig• Sgi = 0.7• Mandrel = Oval Side Pocket• Min Spacing = 500’• PD= 20 psig• GL Valve = 1” w/ 3/16” port• Casing = &’ OD• Directional Well• Gg = 0.032• Twh = Measured: 100 ‘F
• Use all known information
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 175
5.3.2 Well Data• Pr = Pws = gsx(Depth-SFL) + Pwh• Pws = 0.465 x (8000 – 900*) + 50 = 3350 psig
…..from sonic fluid level measurement • Pwf = 2550 psig from Fig. 21
• Pb = Bubble Point Using Standing’s = 1500 psia
• Gg = 0.032 psi/ft Fig. 5
• Temp. gradient = 100x(180-100)/8000= 1 ‘F/100’
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 176
API RP 11V6Example # 3
2550 psig
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 177
GOR = 400SGg = 0.85Oil Gr. = 35Ff = 180
BP = 1500 psia
Bubble Point
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 178
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
PWF;
FLO
WIN
G P
RES
SUR
E (P
SIA
) OR
(kPa
)
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
5.3 API Example Problem No. 3
Pws = 3350 psig
Pwf = 2550 psig
PI = 200/(3350-2550) = .25 bpd/psi
Qmax = 670 bpd
BP
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 1791501 8000
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A10
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A9
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A8
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A7
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.142 6076 808 600 6
OK1477 1078 7370 0.130 4803 1343 500 5
OK1415 796 5728 0.118 3833 1750 400 4
OK1359 569 4236 0.106 2881 2150 300 3
OK1307 388 2853 0.094 1929 2550 200 2
OK1259 249 1568 0.082 976 2950 100 1
1200 120 0 0.070 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwfRATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
Maximum Production Rate 0f 500+ bfpd from 7370 ft
API 11V6 Example # 3: Equilibrium Curve Data
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 180
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRES
SUR
E (p
si) o
r (ba
r)
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GAS INJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
200 BPD500 BPD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 181
Well Data: Mandrel Spacing: Well straight to 1500’ then Directional
• No. Dtv / Dm• 0 0’ 0’• 1 2350’ 2450’• 2 3460’ 3921’• 3 4345’ 5094’• 4 5000’ 5962’• 5 5500’ 6624’• 6 6000’ 7287’• 7 6500’ 7949’• 8 7000’ 8612’• 9 7500’ 9274’• 10 7900’ 9804’
41+ degree angle from2450’ to total depth
Dtv TD Dm
o 1500’
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 182
*
* Fluid rate---50% cut
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 183
Gas Passage Chart
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 184
PPEF = 0.104
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 185
API RP 11V6 Example # 3
ORIGINALSPACINGDESIGN
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 186
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
PRE
SS
URE
(psi
)
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
API RP 11V6: Example # 3- Ideal spacing
500 bfpd
Requires pulling tubing to re-space
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 187
AGL_SET:INJECTION PRESSURE VALVE DESIGNExample
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) of (meters)
PRE
SS
URE
(psi
) or
(bar
)
INJ GAS TBG Temp VALVE SPACING
Valve installed in each mandrel
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 188
API RP 11V6 Example Problem No. 3
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 189
QgiMCFD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 190
PPEF = 0.104Pvo = (PPEFxPpd+Piod) x CT
Ppd PPEF CT
.88.104
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 191
4345 D
5500 D
D
WELL NAME: API RP 11V6: Fixed Mandrels-Example # 3D(n) Ppd(n) Pio(n) Piod(n) Tv CT Pvo(n) Qgi
NO. DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T-R INJ GAS ft psi psi psi 'F - psi mscfd
(INPUT) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 0 120 1200 1200 100 - - 1 2350 406 1200 1275 124 0.873 1150 9172 3460 562 1180 1288 135 0.854 1151 9183 5000 800 1160 1315 150 0.829 1159 9184 6000 968 1140 1323 160 0.813 1158 8485 6500 1056 1120 1315 165 0.806 1148 7616 7000 1147 1100 1307 170 0.799 1139 6267 7500 1240 1080 1298 175 0.792 1129 3938 7900 1317 1060 1286 179 0.786 1118 #N/A
1/4” SODummy
4345 D5500 D
D
API RP 11V6 Example # 3:Table 7 - Mandrel/Valve Summary
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 192
Summary Example Problem No. 3
• Calculated a PI = 0.25 bfpd• Used Equilibrium Curve to predict a rate of 500+ bfpd
from about 7500 ft.• Spaced valves using TVD• Recommended valves @ 2350, 3460, 5000, 6000,
6500 & 7000 ft with dummies @ 4345, 5500 & 7900 ft plus a 14/64 inch screened orifice @ 7500 ft to pass 500 MCFD
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 193
Summary for Design• The better the data, the more specific the design.• The poorer the data, the more flexible the design.• If feasible, design to lift from near bottom.• Carefully select the tubing size.• For better valve performance, use 1 ½-inch valves.
Select the smallest port that will pass the required injection gas.
• For most wells, use a screened orifice as the bottom injection “valve.”
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 194
Impact of Significant Variables• INJECTION PRESSURE: The higher the injection gas pressure, the
wider the mandrel spacing and the deeper the maximum lift depth can be.
• FLOWING WELLHEAD TUBINE PRESSURE: The higher the pressure, the lower the maximum producing rate and the higher the injection gas requirement will be.
• TUBING SIZE: Larger tubing sizes permit higher producing rates and wider mandrel spacing.
• UNLOADING GRADIENTS: Higher gradients mean closer mandrel spacing and shallower maximum lift depths.
• INJECTION GAS GRAVITY: Higher gas gravity means wider mandrel spacing and higher test rack opening pressures for gas lift valves.
• CLOSER MANDREL SPACING: Permits near optimum gas lift performance and unloading the well with less injection gas volume.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 195
DESIGN PRINCIPLES
• CLOSER MANDREL SPACING IS PREFERRED.
• HIGHER PRODUCTIVITY WELLS REQUIRE CLOSER MANDREL SPACING NEAR TOP OF WELL.
• MANDREL SPACING SHOULD BE BASED ON WELL LIFE CYCLE ESPECIALLY OFFSHORE.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 196
GOOD GAS-LIFT PRACTICES
• Streamlined Wellhead• Flowline Size• Separator Pressure• Well Conditioning
f/Unloading• Unloading Precautions
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 197
UNLOADING PRECAUTIONS
• Don’t Cut Out the Valves!• Buildup Injection Pressure Slowly• 5 psi/min. to 400 psi• 10 psi/min. Until Gas Production• Then increase Gas Injection Rate
to the Desired Value
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 198……………….GasLift Workshop - Smith & Clegg 2/3/2006 Page 82
PreferencesSINGLE COMPLETIONS PREFERRED OVER DUALS.LARGER OD (1.5”) GAS LIFT VALVES PERMIT SMALLER INJECTION PRESSURE DROPS FOR CONTINUOUS FLOW IN SMALLER PORT SIZES.MANDRELS W/ORIENTING SLEEVES BETTER FOR HIGHLY DEVIATED WELLS.RuleOfThumb: FLOWLINE SIZE SHOULD BE ONE STANDARD SIZE LARGER THAN TUBING SIZE.STREAMLINING WELLHEADS REDUCES FLOWING WELLHEAD BACKPRESSURE & INJECTION GAS REQUIREMENT.
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 199
Summary
• You have learned to do a complete gas lift design using an equilibrium curve to determine the max rate, various graphical methods for spacing, and how to calculate the test rack pressures for injection pressure operated valves.
• You how know more than most people about gas lift---hopefully!
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 200
This is to certify that
________________
Completed the
API Gas-LiftDesign Course
Sid Smith