Top Banner
Differences Between API- 2000 5 th and 6 th Editions Brad Otis April 26, 2010 2010 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting
21

Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Apr 13, 2017

Download

Engineering

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Differences Between API-2000 5th and 6th Editions

Brad OtisApril 26, 2010

2010 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting

Page 2: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly or indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation the expressions "Shell", "Group" and "Shell Group" are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Group companies in general. Likewise the words "we", "us" and "our" are also used to refer to Group companies in general or those who work for them. The expressions are also used where there is no purpose in identifying specific companies.

Shell Global Solutions is a network of independent technology companies in the Shell Group. In this presentation the expression ‘Shell Global Solutions’ is sometimes used for convenience where reference is made to these companies in general, or where no useful purpose is served by identifying a particular company.  The information contained in this presentation contains forward-looking statements, that are subject to risk factors which may affect the outcome of the matters covered. None of Shell International B.V., any other Shell company and their respective officers, employees and agents represents the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth in this presentation and none of the foregoing shall be liable for any loss, cost, expense or damage (whether arising from negligence or otherwise) relating to the use of such information.

The information contained in this presentation is intended to be general in nature and must not be relied on as specific advice in connection with any decisions you may make. Shell Global Solutions is not liable for any action you may take as a result of you relying on such material or for any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of you taking this action. Furthermore, these materials do not in any way constitute an offer to provide specific services. Some services may not be available in certain countries or political subdivisions thereof.

Copyright © 2010 Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc. All copyright and other (intellectual property) rights in all text, images and other information contained in this presentation are the property of Shell International B.V. or other Shell companies. Permission should be sought from Shell International B.V. before any part of this presentation is reproduced, stored or transmitted by any means, electronic or mechanical including by photocopy, recording or information storage and retrieval system.

 

Page 3: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Agenda Recent History Significant Differences

o Normal Tank Ventingo Internal Deflagrationo Flame Propagation Through PVVso Refrigerated Tank Ventingo Testing of Venting Devices

Path Forward

Page 4: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Recent History API-2000 5th Edition

o Published April 1998o Work started on 6th edition

ISO - 28300o New work item submitted in June 2006o Convert and update API-2000 into ISO Standard o FDIS 28300 submitted Jan 2008o Memo highlighting differences issuedo FDIS approved with no negative ballots

API adopted-back in Dec 09 with no negative ballots Now working 2nd edition of ISO-28300 (API-2000 7th

edition)

Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document

Page 5: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant DifferencesNormal Tank Venting EN 14015 Tank Venting

o EN 14015 Tank design standard used in Europeo Venting model based on theory and validated via testo Applicable to any tank service, any temperature, and

any sizeo Therefore placed in main body of ISO standard

API-2000 5th Edition Tank Venting o Venting model based on theory with simplified

assumptionso Applicable to hexane or similar services, temperature

< 120 F, and tanks < 180,0000 bblso Therefore placed in Annex A of ISO standard

Page 6: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

EN-14015 Validation TestTests and model calculations at Hoechst in 1980 and 1981

• Tank: V = 617 m3; D = 8,5 m; H = 10,6 m• 17 °C ≤ Δ T ≤ 26 °C• Water (rain) flow density: about 60 kg/m2h• TRbF-model calculation

Page 7: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant DifferencesNormal Tank Venting - continued Discussion

o Both methods are acceptable when applied correctlyo Both were included

• To fill gap where Annex A method does not apply• To allow continued use of the Annex A method• To ensure global support for the FDIS

o EN-14015 vent loads can be higher than Annex A• Calculations and comparison courtesy of Protego

(USA) Inc.

Page 8: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Calculation – ExamplesTank 1

Tank:- Height: 5m- Diameter: 7m- Tank volume: 192.4 m3- Pump in rate: 96 m3/h- Pump out rate: 96 m3/h- Vertical tank- No insulation- MAWP: 7.5 mbar- MAWV: 2.5 mbar

Page 9: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Inbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1

Inbreathing requirements Tank 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

API 2000 EN 14015,North, VPHexane

EN 14015,North, VP>

Hexane

EN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane

EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane

EN 14015,South, VPHexane

EN 14015,South, VP>

Hexane

TRbF 20

Vent

ing

requ

irem

ents

[m3/

h]

Pump out Thermal

Page 10: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Outbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1

226

116 117 123 130

118 122109

Outbreathing requirements Tank 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

API 2000, FP<37.8C

API 2000, FP>=37.8C

EN 14015,North

EN 14015, 42-58

EN 14015,South

TRbF 20 TRbF 20-2 TRbF 20-3

Vent

ing

requ

irem

ents

[m3/

h]

Pump in Thermal

H/D = 0.5H/D = 2

H/D = 0.71

Page 11: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Small tanks (<3,180 m3)

Comparision Venting Requirements for Thermal Inbreathing

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

100 200 500 1000 2000 3180

Tank Volume [m3]

Ven

ting

Req

uire

men

ts [m

3/h]

API 2000 EN 14015, North, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, North, VP> Hexane, T>= 25CEN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, South, VP Hexane, T< 25CEN 14015, South, VP>Hexane, T>=25C TRbF 20

Page 12: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Large tanks (>3,180 m3)

Comparision Venting Requirements for Thermal Inbreathing

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

5000 10000 20000 50000 100000

Tank Volume [m3]

Ven

ting

Req

uire

men

ts [m

3/h]

API 2000 EN 14015, North, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, North, VP> Hexane, T>= 25CEN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, South, VP Hexane, T< 25CEN 14015, South, VP>Hexane, T>=25C TRbF 20

Outside scope of API 2000

Page 13: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Small tanks (<3,180 m3)

Comparision Venting Requirements Outbreathing, Thermal

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

100 200 500 1000 2000 3180

Tank Volume [m3}

Ven

ting

Req

uire

men

ts [m

3/h]

API, FP<37.8C API, FP>37.8C EN 14015, North EN 14015, 42-58 EN 14015, South TRbF 20

Page 14: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Large tanks (>3,180 m3)

Comparision Venting Requirements Outbreathing, Thermal

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

5000 10000 20000 50000 100000

Tank Volume [m3}

Ven

ting

Req

uire

men

ts [m

3/h]

API, FP<37.8C API, FP>37.8C EN 14015, North EN 14015, 42-58 EN 14015, South TRbF 20

Outside scope of API 2000

Page 15: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant DifferencesNormal Tank Venting - continued Discussion

o “Operational experience with petroleum or petrochemical fluid storage tanks indicates that tank failures/damage due to vacuum have not been caused by inadequate venting when that relief system is designed using the method in this Annex”

o Tanks that meet the criteria in Annex A can have tank vents designed using the method shown in Annex A.

o Tanks that don’t meet the Annex A criteria, then the general method in 4.3.2.1 should be used.

Questions?

Page 16: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant Differences

Internal Deflagration New section on tank internal deflagration Provides examples on how this may be mitigated Previously no “home” for this issue Detailed presentation on this on 4/28/10 at API-2000

meeting

Questions?

Page 17: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant Differences

Flame Propagation Through PVV The 5th edition states “A flame arrester is not

considered necessary for use in conjunction with a PV valve venting to atmosphere because flame speeds are less than vapor velocities across the seats of PV.”

Recent controlled experiments have shown that flash back through a PVV is possible during very low unstable outflow conditions or if there is an external flammable vapor cloud that ignites with sufficient overpressure to lift the vacuum pallet.

Page 18: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant Differences

Flame Propagation Through PVV - continued API-2010 and NFPA-30 have language similar to what

was stated in the 5th edition of API-2000 Until those standards are updated, there will appear to

be an inconsistency on this issue.

Questions?

Page 19: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant Differences

Refrigerated Tank Venting Completely re-written Previously was based on hexane Borrowed heavily from EN14620 and EN1473

Questions?

Page 20: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Significant Differences

Testing of Venting Devices New section to provide consistency in capacity testing Combination of API 2000 5th edition section 4.6 and EN

14015 Annex L.6.

Questions?

Page 21: Api 2000 5th vs 6th final

Path Forward

2nd Edition of ISO-28300 is being worked now Fall 2010 is deadline for submitting new items