Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention: A Critical Connection October 30, 2014 Anurag Malani, M.D. Medical Director, Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs St. Joseph Mercy Health System Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Michigan
64
Embed
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention: A Critical Connection October 30, 2014 Anurag Malani, M.D. Medical Director, Infection Prevention and.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention:
A Critical Connection
October 30, 2014
Anurag Malani, M.D.Medical Director, Infection Prevention and
Antimicrobial Stewardship ProgramsSt. Joseph Mercy Health System
Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Michigan
Outline
Reasons for urgency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs)
Understand the purpose, goals, and provide overview of an ASP
Describe ASPs in key settings Summary and case studies
What is Antimicrobial Stewardship?
“The selection of the optimal antimicrobial agent, route of administration, dose, and duration to provide maximal clinical benefit, while minimizing unintended consequences.”
Why Antimicrobial Stewardship?
Up to 50% of abx use is inappropriate High quantity, poor quality
Inappropriate & unnecessary abx use can lead to selection of resistant pathogens
Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase Emergence of antimicrobial resistance leads to
significant impact on pt morbidity & mortality, health care costs
Dellit TH, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159-77
Why Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care?
Implementation of ASP in LTCF has been limited U.S. population continues to age
Estimated 21% of population in 2040 > 65 y More than 15,000 nursing homes
High prevalance of colonization and infection with MDRO
Failure to control abx use in LTCF can also affect surrounding hospitals
Rhee S, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:237-46
How We Acquire Antibiotic Resistant Organisms in Hospitals
Spellberg B et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:155-164
Impending Crisis of New Antibiotics
Last new class of drugs active against GNB, in the 1970s, – “Trimethoprim”
No new classes of antimicrobials in the foreseeable future
No new drugs to deal with multi-resistant GNB until 2018
WHO – “Antibiotic resistance” as one of major threats to human health
1. Bartlett J. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:S4. 2. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Forms/ECDC_DispForm.aspx?ID=444.
Evolving Resistance, The“ESKAPE” Organisms
Enterococcus faeciumStaphylococcus aureusKlebsiella pneumoniaeAcinetobacter baumanniiPseudomonas aeruginosaEnterobacter species
Bartlett J. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:S4. .
Controlling Resistance?
A combination of BOTHEffective antimicrobial stewardship
program
ANDComprehensive infection control program
Have been shown to limit the emergence and transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria
Dellit TH, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159-77
Antimicrobial Stewardship Works
Valiquette L, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:112-121
Impact of a Reduction in the Use of High-Risk Antibiotics on the Course of an Epidemic ofClostridium difficile-Associated Disease Caused by the Hypervirulent NAP1/027 Strain
Antimicrobial Stewardship Reduces Costs
Standiford H, et al. Infect Cont Hosp Epi 2012;33:338-46.
Clinical outcomes better with antimicrobial stewardship
Reduce or attenuate advancing antimicrobial resistance
Improve patient outcomes and reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials- Decrease Clostridium difficile infection
- Decrease morbidity and mortality
- Decrease length of stay
Decrease healthcare expenditures and antimicrobial costs
Ohl CA. Seminar Infect Control 2001;1:210-21Dellit TH, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159-77
Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Prospective audit with intervention and
feedback Formulary restriction and preauthorization Educations Streamlining and de-escalating Dose optimization Guidelines and clinical pathways Parenteral to oral conversion
Dellit TH, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159-77
Antimicrobial Stewardship Partners
Information Technology
Clinical Pharmacists
Infection Control
Microbiology Lab
Clinicians & Residents
ID Physicians & Fellows
Abx SubcommitteePharmacy and Therapeutics Committee
Administration
SJMAA Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
Focus on restricted abx- New starts, duration
Interventions- Approve- Stop abx- Change/Narrow abx- Obtain ID Consult- Against ASP advice
SJMAA Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
Outcomes from SJMAA ASP (2009-10)
Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomesof patients pre-ASP compared to patients post-ASP
Multivariable analysis for association of ASP and patient outcomes
Malani AN, et al. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:145-8.
Flow Diagram of Outcomes from ASP
Malani AN, et al. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:145-8.
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012Percent Change
Antimicrobial agents total costs
1,503,748 1,274,837 1,231,079 1,221,275-18.8
(-784,053)
Total patient days 147,955 144,783 146,332 146,310
Antimicrobial costs per patient day (average)
10.16 8.81 8.41 8.35 -17.8
Targeted antimicrobial agents
462,404 297,851 278,998 342,997-25.8
(-467,360)
Antimicrobial Costs by Fiscal Year
Incidence and mortality of CDI are increasing in US
An
nu
al M
orta
lity R
ate
p
er M
illion
Po
pu
latio
n
1. Elixhauser A, et al. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Statistical Brief #50. April 2008. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb50.pdf.
2. Redelings MD, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1417-1419.
# o
f C
DI
Ca
se
s p
er
10
0,0
00
Dis
ch
arg
es
National Efforts on Antimicrobial Stewardship
SHEA Task Force IDSA and PIDS CDC Get Smart Campaign – Core Elements
www.cdc.gov/getsmart/ JTC National Patient Safety Goals
(NPSG) 07.03.01 California Senate Bill 739
22% of 135 surveyed CA hospitals influenced to initiate an ASP
Trivedi K, Rosenberg J. Infect Cont Hosp Epi 2013;34:379-84.
Daily activities of IPs/HEs vital for ASPImplementation of evidenced-based
practice and prevention care bundles (hand hygiene, isolation precautions, environmental cleaning, etc)
No transmission of infection = Avoidance of abx
Role of the Infection Preventionist
Identification and surveillance of MDROs Monitoring and reporting of trends of MDROs Promote high compliance with hand hygiene Track and analyze trends in antimicrobial
resistance Educate multidisciplinary rounding teams about
NHSN surveillance definitions of HAIs Partners for accountability – share findings with
and progress to stakeholders and providers
Moody J, et al Infect Cont Hosp Epi 2012;33:328-30.
Barriers for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care
Limited staffing and infrastructure Having clinical providers off-site Decision-making based on communications from
front-line staff Limited diagnostic testing on-site leads to delays
in obtaining, processing, and specimen results
Trivedi K, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:281-89.
Recommendations for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care
Composition of ASP team are different Staff pharmD, IP, Administration – Med. Director,
DON, rep. from nursing/medical staff When available: ID physician (telemedicine)
Development of ASP in settings with limited resources should be approached as “menu of interventions and strategies”
Successful ASPs have been implemented in variety of nonuniversity settings
Trivedi K, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:281-89.
Strategies for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care
Education – complete ASP educational offering Incorporate high-abx prescribing disciplines in
ASP (i.e. hospitalist) Use nonphysician HCP as extenders of ASP Develop, calculate, track basic metrics
Antimicrobial cost/pt day MDRO and CDI trends
Prepare an annual antibiogram Allow pharmacy to make automatic conversions
(IV to PO; dosing: aminoglycoside/vanc,renal)
Trivedi K, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:281-89.
Strategies for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care
Incorporate evidenced-based guidelines into order sets and protocols Loeb criteria proposed to improve abx use McGeer criteria – surveillance definitions in LTCF
Trivedi K, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:281-89.
How to start Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long Term Care
Identify all interested parties Buy-in from administration
Medical director, DON
Understand current institutional approaches for treating infectious disease syndromes
Identify physician champions Target 2 to 4 abx-related issues
Formulary restriction, etc
Trivedi K, et al. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:281-89.
Stewardship at Transitions of Care
All pts to get parenteral abx seen by ID prior to d/c at Cleveland Clinic
Targeting pts at transitions of care (hospital to community) is an AS strategy
Shrestha , et al Infect Cont Hosp Epi 2012;33:401-04.
Current State of Stewardship at SJMAA
Track all restricted antimicrobials Track all antimicrobials in high risk pts Use software for surveillance, tracking, clinical
decision support Development of bundles for specific
infections/syndromes Use of antimicrobial timeouts and rapid
diagnostic testing Lead quality initiatives related to abx use (i.e.
SCIP)
Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Infection-Prevention Measures
1. Stulberg JJ, et al. JAMA 2010;303:2479-2485.
2. File T, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:S15-22.
Clostridium difficle Infection Powerplan
Antimicrobial Management Page
Summary
Primary mission of ASPs is patient safety Goals of ASPs are to ensure that there are
systems and support to help providers use antibiotics optimally
ASPs can improve pt outcomes, reduce tx costs, reduce CDI, & reduce or slow the development of resistant organisms
ASPs can and must be implemented across continuum of care
Case # 1
49 y/o F, hx of Downs Recurrent hospitalizations, most recently 1 wk prior Hx of recent clogging of J-tube No fevers WBC 4.5 U/A shows + LE, + nitrites, 10 WBC Urine cx shows MDRO
Case # 1
49 y/o F, hx of Downs Recurrent hospitalizations, most recently 1 wk prior Hx of recent clogging of J-tube No fevers WBC 4.5 U/A shows + LE, + nitrites, 10 WBC Urine cx shows MDRO
* Final Report *URINE CULTURE + SUSCEPTIBILITY Source: URINE Collected: 04/17/11 1219 --------------------------------------------- Culture (Final) COLONY COUNT: >100,000 CFU/ML Escherichia coli THIS ORGANISM PRODUCES AN EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA- LACTAMASE (ESBL). IT SHOULD BE REGARDED AS RESISTANT TO ALL CEPHALOSPORINS, REGARDLESS OF THE RESULTS OF ROUTINE SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING.
E.coli ______ MIC 0006054646 ___ __________ AMIKACIN 4 S AMPICILL/SULBAC >=32 R AMPICILLIN >=32 R AZTREONAM >=64 R CEFAZOLIN >=64 R CEFEPIME 16 R CEFTRIAXONE >=64 R CIPROFLOXACIN >=4 R ERTAPENEM <=0.5 S ESBL POSITIVE GENTAMICIN >=16 R MEROPENEM <=0.25 S NITROFURANTOIN <=16 S TOBRAMYCIN >=16 R TRIMETH-SULFA >=320 R
Case # 1
A. Start Ertapenem. B. Start Amikacin.C. Start Meropenem.D. No treatment.
Case # 1Take Home Points
No need to treat asymptomatic bacteriuria
- No urinary tract signs or symptoms- Typical pathogens (not contaminants)- Urine appropriately collected
145 patients with a positive urine culture, defined by having any growth of bacteria or
yeast on a urine culture
70 with asymptomatic
bacteriuria
75 had a UTI based on guideline review
43 treated for a UTI
27 not treated for a UTI
Treatment of Positive Urine Cultures in Hospitalized Patients:A Key Driver of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use – SJMH AA
145 patients with a positive urine culture, defined by having any growth of bacteria or
yeast on a urine culture
57 with asymptomatic
bacteriuria
88 had a UTI based on guideline review
37 treated for a UTI
20 not treated for a UTI
Treatment of Positive Urine Cultures in Hospitalized Patients:A Key Driver of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use – Livingston
Case # 2
83 year old male s/p AAA repair Extubated in PACU and tx to the 2000 unit 4 days later, develops respiratory distress, SICU
tx, and reintubation. Further evaluation:
New infiltrate on CXR WBC 26.5Tmax 101.9
Case # 2
Started on Cefepime and Vancomycin. Has PCN allergy (rash).
After 1 wk, WBC decreased to 13.7 Final culture & sensitivities from sputum show: Direct Smear: Moderate neutrophils, GNB
Culture (Final): Enterobacter aerogenes
Enterobacter aerogenes
MIC INTAmpicillin/SulbAmpicillinAztreonamCefazolinCefepimeCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinGentamicinMeropenemPiper/TazobacTobramycinTrimeth-Sulfa
816<=1>=64<=1<=1<=0.25<=1<=0.25<=4<=1<=20
RRSRSSSSSSSS
Case # 2
Pt received 72 hours of Cefepime/Vancomycin Readdress abx regimen given cx results
A. Continue Cefepime and Vancomycin B. Continue Cefepime. D/C Vancomycin.C. De-escalate Cefepime to a different abx. D/C
Vancomycin.
Case # 2Take Home Points
Antibiotic Timeout (reasons for abx use) Streamlining and de-escalating Duration for abx course Clear plans when transitions of care (tx to/from
ICUs/discharge summaries/ECFs)
Case # 3
Case # 3
88 y/o male, hx of dementia, presented with confusion/weakness
Recent stay at an ECF, presented with foley WBC 13.4 Started on Ceftriaxone Cefepime/Vancomycin Blood cx: ¾ CNS Urine cx: alpha hemolytic streptococcus U/A 57 WBC, + LE
Case # 3
No fevers, exam significant for L knee effusion/pain
ID c/s stopped all abx Underwent arthrocentesis Pseudogout A few days later, started on IV flagyl for CDI Changed over to PO flagyl D/C back to ECF
Case # 3
While at ECF, receives ertapenem for ESBL
E. Coli bacteriuria, and then nitrofurantoin for VRE bacteriuria
Presents 1 month from previous admission with abdominal pain, diarrhea, lethargy, WBC 15.9
Started on IV ceftriaxone/flagyl Seen by ID
Case # 3
A. Add po VancomycinB. D/C Ceftriaxone, add po Vancomycin. C. Change abx to ZosynD. No treatment
Case # 3
Severe CDI Pt eventually goes on hospice despite maximal
medical tx for a wk
Case # 3Take Home Points
Aware of adverse effects of abx including CDI, MDRO, etc
Improved abx use improves pt outcomes AS through continuum of care is critical