RRISD Grievance 1 – Erik Okerholm 2/3/2012 Page 1Is support of this grievance, I refer you to the following link to RRISD webpage, quote and image: https://www.roundrockisd.org/index.aspx?page=3876#charter “Objective The objective of the C itizen’s Boundary Committee is to ensure that campus boundary changes provide an optimum attendance pattern for each school affected while considering campus demographics, district growth, and the financial impact of the proposed changes, particularly in the area oftransportation. The committee shall consider balancing enrollments for all elementary campuses around the Elsa England Elementary School area, and look at all high school campuses to relieve the projected growth at Cedar Ridge H igh School .”Based on the above statement in the Boundary Committee (BC) Charter I do not feel the District has done the proper due diligence in pr eparation for this Boundary Discussion or Decision. You have broken your own policy by not having hearings at RRHS and WWHS, when in fact “all” high school (HS) campuses were mentioned in this Charter you published online. The fact that The Administration did not have a hearing at those schools should not preclude you (the Board or Administration) now from calling
3
Embed
Another Grievance filed against the Round Rock ISD Superintendant
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/3/2019 Another Grievance filed against the Round Rock ISD Superintendant
The objective of the Citizen’s Boundary Committee is to ensure that campus boundary changes provide
an optimum attendance pattern for each school affected while considering campus demographics,district growth, and the financial impact of the proposed changes, particularly in the area of
transportation. The committee shall consider balancing enrollments for all elementary campuses around
the Elsa England Elementary School area, and look at all high school campuses to relieve the projected
growth at Cedar Ridge High School.”
Based on the above statement in the Boundary Committee (BC) Charter I do not feel the District has
done the proper due diligence in preparation for this Boundary Discussion or Decision. You have broken
your own policy by not having hearings at RRHS and WWHS, when in fact “all” high school (HS)
campuses were mentioned in this Charter you published online. The fact that The Administration did not
have a hearing at those schools should not preclude you (the Board or Administration) now from calling
In addition to the extra hearings at the mentioned schools, I feel that The District and Administrationshould reiterate and clarify the Charter to the public, Boundary Committee, if reconvened, and/or The
Board to relieve them and their analysis from the unfounded restriction of only addressing boundaries
and student movement as they relate to CRHS, MHS, and SPHS.
Unfortunately the BC and Board have expressed their interpretation of said BC Charter and their
perceived restriction that is in direct conflict with the literal and accurate interpretation of the published
Charter and ability to widen the scope of their analysis and recommendations in this boundary process.
That is in direct conflict with what is best for the majority of communities, families, and more