Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013
Dec 27, 2015
Annual Report to the Public
October Board Meeting 2013
NLRSD Student Enrollment
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
District Enrollment 9110 9368 9334 8974 8970 9119 8862 8545 8610
8100
8300
8500
8700
8900
9100
9300
9500
NLRSD Enrollment Breakdown
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
KindergartenGrade 6Grade 9
Elementary Accreditation Status
• Amboy Elementary- Fully Accredited• Boone Park Elementary- Fully Accredited• Crestwood Elementary- Fully Accredited• Glenview Elementary- Fully Accredited• Indian Hills Elementary- Fully Accredited• Lakewood Elementary- Fully Accredited• Lynch Drive Elementary- Fully Accredited• Meadow Park Elementary - Fully Accredited• North Heights Elementary - Fully Accredited• Park Hill Elementary - Fully Accredited• Pike View Elementary - Fully Accredited• Redwood Preschool – Fully Accredited• Seventh Street Elementary - Fully Accredited
Secondary Accreditation Status
• Ridgeroad Middle School – Fully Accredited• Lakewood Middle School – Fully Accredited• North Little Rock Academy – Fully Accredited• North Little Rock High School – Fully
Accredited
ESEA PRELIMINARY STATUS FOR 2012-2013ACCOUNTABILITY
STATUS DESCRIPTIONADE ENGAGEMENT/
DISTRICT AUTONOMY
EXEMPLARY
HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PROGRESS HIGH TAGG HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH TAGG HIGH PROGRESS
VERY LOW ADE ENGAGEMENT/VERY HIGH
DISTRICT AUTONOMY
ACHIEVING
MEET ALL 3-YR PERFORMANCE RATE, GROWTH RATE AND GROWTH AMOS FOR ALL STUDENTS AND TAGG
MEET ALL 1-YR PERFORMANCE AND GRADUATION RATE AMOS FOR ALL STUDENTS AND TAGG, BUT MISS GROWTH AMOS FOR ALL STUDENTS OR TAGG
VERY LOW ADE ENGAGEMENT/HIGH DISTRICT AUTONOMY
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT DOES NOT MEET PERFORMANCE, GRADUATION RATE OR GROWTH AMOS FOR ALL STUDENTS AND TAGG
LOW TO MODERATE ADE ENGAGEMENT/MODERATE DISTRICT AUTONOMY
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FOCUS
SCHOOLS WITH LARGEST, PERSISTENT GAPS BETWEEN NON-TAGG AND TAGG
HIGH ADE ENGAGEMENT/ LOW DISTRICT AUTONOMY
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY
SCHOOLS WITH PERSISTENTLY LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT IN MATH AND LITERACY OVER THREE YEARS FOR ALL STUDENTS
VERY HIGH ADE ENGAGEMENT/LOW
DISTRICT AUTONOMY
North Little Rock School Status
Priority schools include the bottom 5% of schools with the lowest levels of student performance. Focus schools include 10% of Title I schools with the largestTAGG/Non-TAGG achievement gaps. Needs Improvement schools scored above the bottom 5%, and do not have significant achievement gaps between their TAGG/Non-TAGG. Needs Improvement schools have at least one academic area or subgroup needing advancement. Achieving schools met all their performance goals in 2013 for their TAGG and combine population. Exemplary schools include the top 1% of schools that had high performance, high TAGG and high progress.
Focus schools- Crestwood, Indian Hills, Lynch Drive (status pending), No. Heights, Pike View, Seventh Street, Lakewood Middle
Needs Improvement schools- Amboy, Lakewood Elementary, Meadow Park, Park Hill, Ridgeroad Middle, North Little Rock High, North Little Rock Academy, NLRSD
Achieving Schools- Glenview, Boone Park
Amboy (NI)
Boone Park (A
)
Crestwood (N
IF)
Glenview (A
)
Indian Hills
(NIF)
Lake
wood (NI)
Lynch
Drive (N
IF)
Mead
ow Park (N
I)
North Heigh
ts (N
IF)
Park Hill(
NI)
Pike View (N
IF)
Seve
nth St
reet (NIF)
NLRSD
(NI)
0102030405060708090
100
TAGGAll Students
2013 Math Performance AMO
DID NOT MEET 2013 AMOs
Amboy (NI)
Boone Park (A
)
Crestwood (N
IF)
Glenview (A
)
Indian Hills
(NIF)
Lake
wood (NI)
Lynch
Drive (N
IF)
Mead
ow Park (N
I)
North Heigh
ts (N
IF)
Park Hill(
NI)
Pike View (N
IF)
Seve
nth St
reet (NIF)
NLRSD
(NI)
0102030405060708090
100
TAGGAll Students
DID NOT MEET 2013 AMOs
2013 Literacy Performance AMO
Spring ACTAAP 2013
MATH LITERACY
80% 77%73%
77%
60%
81%
Elementary Proficiency Rates
3rd 4th 5th
620 students
tested
675 students
tested
652 students
tested
620 students
tested
675 students
tested
652 students
tested
NLRSD Elementary Longitudinal Math Performance
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3rd 67 66 71 76 77 80
4th 63 66 63 71 75 73
5th 55 61 63 64 66 60
52.5
57.5
62.5
67.5
72.5
77.5
82.5
Profi
cien
cy P
erce
ntag
e
NLRSD Elementary Longitudinal Literacy Performance
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3rd 55 57 61 72 73 77
4th 58 64 66 79 82 77
5th 55 58 68 68 82 81
52.5
57.5
62.5
67.5
72.5
77.5
82.5
Profi
cien
cy P
erce
ntag
e
Elementary Areas of Focus/Goals
Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) Reflex Math STAR Math Assessment Use of Math Coaches in some schools Math Curriculum Maps/Units have been revised
and developed More Technology use by students and teachers After School Programs targeted to meet the
differentiated, prescriptive needs of struggling learners
Lakewood Middle (NIF)NLR High (NI)
NLRSD (NI)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TAGGAll Students
TAGGAll Students
2013 Math Performance AMO
DID NOT MEET 2012 AMOs
Lakewood Middle (NIF)NLR High (NI)
NLRSD (NI)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TAGGAll Students
TAGGAll Students
2013 Literacy Performance AMO
DID NOT MEET 2012 AMOs
Spring ACTAAP 2013
MATH LITERACY
59%56%
61% 61%58%
69%66%
16%
74%
Secondary Proficiency Rates
6th 7th 8th Aglebra I Geometry Grade 11
43 students
tested
598 students
tested
618 students
tested
607 students
tested
600 students
tested
557 students
tested
618 students
tested
607 students
tested
600 students
tested
NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Math Performance
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
6th 61 66 60 67 59 59
7th 52 59 63 66 65 61
8th 44 53 55 52 54 58
Algebra I 46 51 61 66 81 66
42.5
47.5
52.5
57.5
62.5
67.5
72.5
77.5
82.5
Profi
cien
cy P
erce
ntag
e
NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Math Performance
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Geometry 52 48 55 55 63 16
20
30
40
50
60
70
Profi
cien
cy P
erce
ntag
e
NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Literacy Performance
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
6th 50 51 56 59 58 56
7th 41 52 59 58 74 61
8th 54 64 71 71 76 69
11th 50 58 58 58 68 74
42.5
47.5
52.5
57.5
62.5
67.5
72.5
77.5
82.5
Profi
cien
cy P
erce
ntag
e
Current 9th Grade Cohort
MATH-COMBINED LITERACY-COMBINED
545507
598 607634670692 677
712768
714772
Scale Scores
Grade 3: 2008 Grade 4: 2009 Grade 5: 2010Grade 6: 2011 Grade 7: 2012 Grade 8: 2013
Current 9th Grade Cohort
MATH-COMBINED LITERACY-COMBINED
67%
55%
66% 64%63%68%67%
59%65%
74%
58%
69%
Proficiency Rate
Grade 3: 2008 Grade 4: 2009 Grade 5: 2010Grade 6: 2011 Grade 7: 2012 Grade 8: 2013
Secondary Areas of Focus/Goals
Credit Recovery
Change in grade level coding
Sequencing of math courses
College and Career Readiness Skills
Common Core Unit Development
NLRSD Graduation AMOs (high schools only)
Baseline graduation rates for 2011 were used to determine AMOs. 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate represents the percentage of students
graduating out of the students expected to graduate. Percentage of students not graduating in 2011-2012 were calculated for each
school for All Students, TAGG and NCLB subgroups.
Cohort Subgroup
2012: # of Students
(587)
2012: % of Cohort
2011: # of Students
(863)
2011: % of Cohort
% of Change
On-Time Graduates
430 73.2% 537 62.2%
11%Non-Graduates (4 years)
157 26.8% 326 37.8%
43%
19%
13%
10%
8%
7%
Non-Graduates Cohort Subgroups
Dropped for Lack of At-tendance
Finished 2012/ 2013 No Shows
Enrolled in GED Prog. Graduated > 4 yearsEnrolled at Another School Other
NLRSD Graduation Rate Cont.
Students can only be removed from their graduation cohort if he/she has not repeated a grade while enrolled in your district and:1. Enrolled in another school in Arkansas2. Death3. Enrolled in private school4. Enrolled in home school5. Enrolled in another school out of state
Cohort Subgroup # of Students (587) % of Cohort
Enrolled at Another School & Repeated
12 Students who left our district on grade level for any of these reasons will
not reflect in our graduation rate.
Home School & Repeated 1
Moved Out of State & Repeated
1
Total 14 2.4%
Cohort Subgroup # of Students (587) % of Cohort
Enrolled in GED Prog. 20 1/2 of students who pursued a GED had repeated at least one grade. Only 2 students who graduated in more than 4 years repeated at least one grade before their senior year.Graduated > 4 years 14
Total 34 5.8%
Non-Graduates Cohort Subgroup
# of Students % of Non Graduates % of Cohort
Repeated Grade in District
83 53.9% 14.1%
Did Not Repeat Grade in District
71 46.1% 12.1%
NLRSDLongitudinal Avg. ACT Performance
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
NLRSD 20 20.2 20.3 20 19.8
AR 20.6 20.3 19.9 20.3 20.2
19.1
19.3
19.5
19.7
19.9
20.1
20.3
20.5
20.7
20.9
Avg
. Com
posi
te A
CT S
core
% of ACT-Tested Students for NLRSD in 2013 Ready for College-Level Coursework
English Algebra Social Science Biology All 4
NLRSD 0.59 0.33 0.31 0.25 0.16
AR 0.63 0.35 0.39 0.29 0.2
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
English Composition: 18 on ACT English TestAlgebra: 22 on ACT Mathematics TestSocial Science: 22 on ACT Reading Test
Biology: 23 on ACT Science Test
NLRSDLongitudinal Adv. Placement Performance
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
NLRSD 29.2 35.7 34.9 37.6 27.8
AR 31.4 32.2 33.1 33.8 33.5
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
% o
f Tot
al S
tude
nts
with
Sco
res
3+
NLRSD: Math/Science2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score
Biology Calculus AB Calculus BC Chemistry Physics B0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
NLRSDAR
NLRSD: Math/Science2013 IB Mean Score
Biology HL Biology SL Physics HL Math Studies SL0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NLRSDWorld-Wide
NLRSD: Arts2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score
Studio Art: 2-D Design Portfolio
Studio Art: 3-D Design Portfolio
Studio Art: Drawing Portfolio
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
NLRSDAR
NLRSD: Liberal Arts2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score
Eng. Lang. & Comp.
Eng. Lit. & Comp.
Pyschology Spanish Lang.
U.S. History World History
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
NLRSDAR
NLRSD: Liberal Arts2013 IB Mean Score
English
A: Lit.
HL
Span
ish AB SL
Span
ish B SL
Hist. A
mericas
HL
Pyschology
HL
Pyschology
SL
Film SL
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NLRSDWorld-Wide
Gifted and Talented
• Total of 1049 students K-12 are identified• Various K-12 programs throughout the district• One of only 5 IB schools in the state
(Bentonville, Springdale, Hot Springs and Mt. Saint Mary)
• IB and CCSS are closely aligned – Globally recognized
• 95% of IB students graduate from college