Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2018 Queens Island

January 2019

Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2018 Queens Island

Prepared by

Bombardier Aerostructures & Engineering Services Short Brothers Plc Airport road, Queen’s Island, Belfast, BT3 9DZ Permit Reference: P0135/06A

Acknowledgement

Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows:

Version Date Approval

Rev:

This report has been reviewed and approved by the following Bombardier personnel:

_ Dr Colette Eastwood,

Table of Contents

Description Page No.

Executive Summary 1 Section 1.0: Introduction 2 Section 2.0: Solvent Reduction Scheme 3 Section 3.0: Air Emission Results 6 Section 4.0: Review of Fugitive Emissions 7 Section 5.0: Water Emission Results 8 Section 6.0: SPMP Summary 9 Section 7.0: Reports Summary

Section 7.1: Environmental Management System (EMS) Targets 11 Section 7.2: Energy Efficiency Review 12 Section 7.3: Raw Material Review 18 Section 7.4: Waste Minimisation Audit 18 Section 7.5: Water Efficiency Audit 18 Section 7.6: Pollution Inventory Report (PIR) 18

Appendix Appendix I Water Emission Reports Appendix II NIW Compliance Reports Appendix III Energy Efficiency Audit Appendix IV Raw Material Review Appendix V Waste Minimisation Audit Appendix VI Water Efficiency Audit Appendix VII Pollution Inventory Report (PIR)

1

Executive Summary

The following report contains information required to be submitted by Bombardier Aerostructures and Engineering Services, Short Brothers Plc (BA) to the regulating agency, Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA), as per the Bombardier Aerospace Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) Permit No P0135/06A. Each section relates to a specific reporting condition outlined in the permit. The structure follows the requirements for annual reporting. Third party reports, spreadsheets or tables, such as external laboratory results and waste spreadsheets are presented in the appendix section at the end of the report. This report demonstrates full environmental compliance with Permit P0135/06A.

2

Section 1.0: Introduction

1.1 Introduction

During 2018 Bombardier Aerostructures and Engineering Services, Short Brothers Plc (BA) made significant investment, and deployed substantial resources, in addressing all aspects of emissions to air, water and land at its Queen’s Island facility. A transfer of production activities to Queens Island as part of the wider company consolidation strategy resulted in an increase in some of the headline target areas such as water consumption and hazardous waste. Areas targeted include:

Tonnage of hazardous waste generated decreased by 9%

Tonnage of recycled waste increased by 11%

Total waste decreased by 2%

Total VOC decreased by 10% Annual production hours increased by 5% in 2018 compared to 2017. The application of LEAN principles through the Achieving Excellence System (AES), which is deployed

at all BA facilities, and the continued rigid implementation of our Environmental Management System

(EMS) have contributed greatly to continual improvement. These systems are driving improvement

projects that will bring BA to the next level of compliance and efficiency.

Significant environmental improvement projects in 2018 included:

Installation of new revised Acid Neutralisation Plant (ANP)

Removal of HCl scrubber and storage tank at Derwent Effluent Treatment Plant

Removal of DI Plant at Derwent Effluent Treatment Plant

Management of Change project software implemented (PEMAC)

Teamworks project management tool implemented to assist with all FM Services projects

Safteykleen paint gun cleaning training

Critical Equipment List review (all sites)

HAZOPS for the following: C04 Derwent Plant

C04 Kurion Plant

C04 Isoprep Skid

C04 Chemi-mill rinse skid

C97 Auto & Manual Line

C97 Effluent Treatment Plant

C97 DI Plant

BA undertakes sampling at all the water emissions points identified within the Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) Permit. (Appendix I) NI Water records show that all BA discharges were within its trade effluent compliance range in 2018 for

MFF1 and AFF1. (Appendix II)

3

Section 2.0: Solvent Reduction Scheme

Significant improvements were made in 2018 on reducing overall solvent usage at the Queen’s Island facility. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) reductions can be attributed to;

Reduced VOC content of Diastone-SRM wipes and liquid solvent by a further 5% on 2017’s 5% reduction (10% reduction in total since 2016)

Continued use of solvent recycler at C88 Paintshop has further reduced consumption of Brushwash and VOC reduction.

Senior Management led engagement with solvent reduction initiatives

Ongoing identification programme to approve and introduce low VOC alternatives and to substitute and/ or eliminate use of high VOC materials

Wipe access at Tool Cribs / stores has improved reporting process via Business Warehouse aiding analysis of solvent consumption across all sites

Effective and correct use of VOC containing materials (wipes and thinners for correct applications, reduced solvent waste e.g. wipes- keeping container lids closed) highlighted via Bgreen and awareness training programmes.

Training of paintshop operators on site by Safetykleen specialists

Solvent focussed Process Control Specification (PCS) checks at Daily Morning Meetings (DMM)

Bombardier demonstrated compliance with the Solvent Reduction Scheme for 2018. An actual emission ratio of 0.49 vs target emission of 0.58. The target emission for 2018 was 22,491kgs of VOC, and BA’s actual emission for 2018 was 19,890kgs VOC, see table 1.0 below.

Table 1.0 – BA Solvent Reduction Scheme results 2018

ACTUAL EMISSION

SOLVENT (kgs VOC) 29,483 18,890

SOLIDS (kgs) 38,778

COMPLIANCE YES/NO YES

0.58

0.49

SOLVENT REDUCTION SCHEME

0.58 x Total Solids Target Emission

22,491 22,491

Table 2.0 – Comparison of target emission vs actual emission

Target Emission

Kgs

Actual Emission

kgs

(Target vs Actual ) % change

2016 17,647 14,961 -15%

2017 23,709 22,203 -6%

2018 22,491 18,890 -16%

4

At each of the Environmental Working Groups (EWG), solvent management has a dedicated section which is discussed in great detail. Site specific reports are generated for each meeting with targets reviewed and problems (if any) highlighted. The data is split into the four solvent use activities: Product Coating, Product Cleaning, Equipment Cleaning, Tool Coating and charted versus target. The sites find this report extremely useful as it allows them to dissect at a local level procurement trends, repeat ordering and problem solvents which are consumed in high volumes. Target solvents are those which either have proliferated or can be reduced through the application of specific recovery or reduction technologies. The main target solvents identified in previous years on the Queen’s Island site included Brushwash, perchloroethylene (PCE) and thinners. These solvents are monitored monthly and reported at EWG’s. Where applicable they are eliminated or substituted for a lower VOC alternative. Figure 1.0 below shows the percentage comparison of the main target solvents. Figure 1.0 – Comparison of Target Solvent usage 2016 - 2018

Table 3.0 – Comparison of target solvent usage 2016 – 2018

Product 2016 2017 2018 % Diff (2017 vs 2018)

Brushwash 7371.00 6715.80 5569.20 -10%

PFSR 8456.34 6851.19 6049.20 -4%

T17 Thinners 107.90 8.30 58.10 600%

66 C 28 Thinners 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%

C25 90S Thinners 701.25 212.50 0.00 -100.0%

From table 3.0 above, target solvents are monitored internally by BA and measured versus previous year. As demonstrated in figure 1.0 there has been a progressive reduction year on year of these ‘target’ solvents especially thinners; C25 90S which was not procured at all in 2018 and 66 C 28 which has been completely substituted. Although a 600% increase in T17 Thinners was experienced, this equates to a relatively small increase in actual VOC therefore causing minimal impact of Queens Island overall emissions.

5

For 2018 onwards, new ‘target solvents’ have been identified. These include big hitters to the company or those which can be easily reduced through various initiatives highlighted in the section below.

Table 4.0 – Comparison of newly identified target solvent usage 2016 – 2018

Product 2016 2017 2018 % Diff (2017 vs 2018)

Brushwash 7371.00 6715.80 6075.49 -10%

Safetykleen 4560.33 3435.96 3066.12 -11%

PFSR 8456.34 6851.19 6599.13 -4%

Diestone Med 5589.00 3214.87 4910.10 53%

Diestone Lrg 446.40 372.44 168.53 -55%

Figure 2.0 – Comparison of Target Solvent usage 2016 – 2018

As evident in Figure 2.0, Brushwash has decreased. This has been aided by the consistent audits conducted by the Environmental Department, solvent Process Control Specification (PCS) checks and the introduction of the solvent recycler in 2016. Safetykleen usage reduced since 2016 also. This correlates with a reduction in throughput at the paint shops however ongoing annual training of the operators on the use of the gun cleaning equipment as seen pickups in VOC at the likes of C04. PFSR solvent continued to show a decreasing trend. Increased awareness of solvent use and a 10% reduction in solvent content of wipes has helped. Diestone consumption increased in 2018 vs 2017. This is directly correlated with increased production on A220 contract. It is the only approved solvent on the contract. Initiatives are underway with M&P and the solvent wipe distributer to explore low / no VOC alternatives. This is an ongoing project.

6

Further initiatives are planned for 2019 and include;

Continued monitoring of storage and disposal of solvent based cleaning materials.

Complete test programme and secure approval for use of A2519 zero solvent wipe to be used at all sites for general cleaning and cleaning prior to painting on composites.

Ongoing engagement with M&P team to identify, approve and introduce low VOC alternatives to substitute and / or eliminate use of high VOC materials. Focus on Diastone DLS wipes which are extremely volatile and emit a large volume of VOC. Also, further work with suppliers to reduce solvent content of already approved wipes on site.

Exploring use of different cloth materials used in solvent wipes for different applications.

Use of a low VOC solvent or other technology to remove rubber maskant from hooks used at Robotic Spray.

Enhanced audit protocol for ordering, delivering, storing, issuing, disposal and use of solvent based cleaning materials.

Best Alternative Technologies - Investigate potential alternatives for surface cleaning solvents and spray gun cleaners.

It is envisaged that the implementation of initiatives outlined above will lead to further solvent and VOC reductions throughout 2019.

7

Section 3.0: Air Emissions Results

A review of the monitoring and analysis was carried out for all air emission points from 2008 – 2015. BA prepared a proposal to the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) to reduce the amount of monitoring completed. A permit variation was submitted to the NIEA which was accepted in principle in 2017. In December 2018 a revised Queens Island permit P0135/06A/V7 was granted and as a result a reduced monitoring regime implemented. Air monitoring results have not been included for 2018 in this report as agreed with the Regulator and will subsequently be submitted thereafter as an appendix. A continuous emission monitor Gas Chromatography Flame Ionising Detector (GC-FID) is installed on the outlet of the Solvent Recovery Plant (SRP). This was serviced once and calibrated twice in 2018. No exceedances were recorded for VOC (expressed as PCE) in 2018 as can be seen in table 4.0, the average daily concentration for each month is recorded and shows that BA have remained below the permitted limit of 20 mg/m3 daily average. The final outlet is the discharge to atmosphere.

Table 5.0 – Monthly Summary of CEMS Emission Concentrations from Solvent Recovery Plant at C04 2018

Year Month

Final Outlet (Avg Daily concentration mg/m3)

PPC Limit 20 mg/m3

2018 JAN 0.13

2018 FEB 0.06

2018 MAR 1.68

2018 APRIL 0.06

2018 MAY 0.04

2018 JUNE 0.05

2018 JULY 0.03

2018 AUG 0.03

2018 SEPT 0.03

2018 OCT 0.03

2018 NOV 0.02

2018 DEC 0.02

8

Section 4.0: Review of Fugitive Emissions

Fugitive emissions at the facility arise from solvents contained in paints, sprays, wipes and cleaning chemicals. The quantity of emission from these sources is calculated using the DEFRA solvent management plan guidance tool. The total fugitive emissions for 2018 from these sources are calculated at 17,817 kg/VOC (Figure 2.0). This figure is greater than last year, due to the transfer of work from Hawlmark to the Queen’s island facility.

Figure 3.0 – Review of fugitive emissions 2016 – 2018

9

Section 5.0: Water Emission Results

BA engaged with Northern Ireland Water (NIW) in 2018 with the goal of establishing discharge consents for all process emissions to the foul system. We are awaiting a decision from NIW to review the consent for AFF1 based on total flow and PCE limit. NIW have completed 12 rounds of monthly sampling at our main emission points arising at our Queen’s Island Facility based effluent treatment plants; MFF1 and AFF1. BA also undertakes sampling at all the foul and storm water emissions points identified within the PPC Permit. Results for can be found in appendix I with accompanying NIW reports of compliance (appendix II) where consents are in place. A revised Trade Effluent discharge consent was received in December 2018 with revised limits to align with the Queens Island permit. The emissions data demonstrates that BA were 100% in 2018.

10

Section 6.0: SPMP Summary

The main focus of the SPMP during 2018 was to review and update the 2017 list of SPMP bunds and the frequency of bund checks, either weekly or monthly, as based on level of risk. This review also enabled any new processes to be included within the overall SPMP design programme for Queen’s Island. Bund numbering was reviewed and new bund labels were obtained and attached to all bunds. 6.1 Condition Score Summary A summary hard standing status for 2018 (Table 6.0) and the bund condition score summary (table 7.0) below contain information relating to the conditions of the bunds recorded for each check in 2018. The condition of each bund and hard standing area is rated on a score of 1 – 5. Table 6.0 lists the number of checks on hard standing that occurred in 2018. Table 7.0 summarises the number of checks that have returned condition scores. The most frequent condition score for bunds was 2 (very good condition) and no bunds recorded a maximum condition score of 5 (very poor condition). There were a total of 2863 SPMP checks and 18 hardstanding checks in 2018. Table 6.0 Summary hard standing status for 2018

Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Score 5

Hard Standing 18 0 0 0 0

Table 7.0 Bund Condition Score Summary for 2018

Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Score 5

Bunds 858 1663 320 22 0

11

The overall quality of the bunding and hard standing areas can be viewed in figure 4.0 and figure 5.0

respectively.

Figure 4.0 – Graph showing the number of bunds vs condition status

Figure 5.0 – Graph showing the number of hard standing (H/S) locations vs condition status

There were no issues with the bunds or hard standing in 2018.

12

Section 7.0: Annual Reports

7.1 Environmental Management System (EMS)

BA have operated an EMS which has been certified to ISO 14001 since 1998 and awarded to ISO14001:2015 standard in December 2016. The organisation uses the EMS to systematically identify the environmental risks, potential impacts and compliance requirements that need to be managed by our business. The EMS ensures that regular reviews of BA operations identify the most significant environmental aspects and provides the information to establish targets which deliver continual improvement. 2018 marked the end of a five year programme overseen by Bombardier Inc., who has set environmental and energy reduction targets for 2014 - 2018, using 2013 as a baseline. These objectives and targets are key to the establishment of the environmental management plans and action plans that deliver environmental improvements across all operations. On the ground the EMS is maintained at each business unit by cross functional Environmental Working Groups. The EWGs in each area consist of production managers, functional managers, maintenance and all other stakeholders whose activities have the potential to impact on the environment. Targets are set for each business unit that are consistent with the targets imposed by Bombardier Inc., whilst also addressing the significant environmental issues at each business unit. The EWGs produce Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) to achieve the objectives and targets. The EMPs are shared out across its functional teams to improve awareness and ownership across the business. The Environmental Department provide templates and support to ensure a consistent and effective approach. Progress against targets is monitored comprehensively in a variety of ways including GRACIS reporting, senior management reviews and local working groups. Example of Main Factory Environmental Management Plan

The EMS is also subject to regular external audits. During 2018 two surveillance audits were carried out by the external auditor (LRQA), in June and December. No non-conformances were raised during these visits which is considered to be a significant achievement given the scale and diversity of BA activities. On a triannual basis Bombardier Inc. engage independent audit teams to evaluate environmental compliance as a global benchmarking exercise. An external audit was completed in October with the final report due in January 2019. In addition, BA Belfast participates annually in the Northern Ireland Environmental Benchmarking Survey which measures environmental management and performance. The company was awarded Top performer in the annual benchmarking survey for the second year running and mentioned its ‘Platinum’ status. This is considered to be further recognition of the robust arrangements in place for delivering compliance and continual improvements.

13

7.2 Energy Efficiency – Schedule 4

Bombardier Aerospace, Belfast has a 5 year energy strategy to utilise onsite power generation for maximum reduction of fossil fuel dependency, hence reducing greenhouse gas emissions, energy costs and supporting long term competitiveness. Renewable technologies include:

Photovoltaic panels at C-Series Facility

Biomethane combustion engines

Energy from waste plant

Detailed below is information relating to the site’s energy consumption as well as a breakdown per fuel type. It also includes a summary of improvement projects that have been initiated with a view to reducing energy usage and carbon/ greenhouse gas emissions across the site. The efficient use of energy and the increased use of renewable and low carbon technologies is a key part of BA strategy for the future. The high cost of energy and the drive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions requires BA to continue the improvement plans already undertaken, results of which can be seen in Tables 7.0 & 8.0. The improvement plans identified and introduced this year will further reduce the energy related carbon footprint.

Table 7.0 lists the energy consumption in 2018 for electricity, gas and oil.

Table S4.1 Energy Consumption

Delivered MWh Primary MWh MWh/tonne % of total

Electricity 28,349 73,708 20,865 63.7

Gas 56,830 56,830 11,614 35.5

Oil 766 766 225 0.7

Other- LPG 156 156 36 0.1

Table 8.0 shows the changes in type and amount of energy consumed over the past 3 years.

Electricity

(MWh) Gas

(MWh) Oil (litres)

2015 29,299 55,982 25,305

2016 26,073 51,262 22,710

2017 27,048 50,455 49,475

2018 28,349 56,830 70,300

2018 saw an increase across all fuel types when compared with 2017. This was mainly due increased heating requirements throughout Q1 of 2018, an unusually cold and prolonged heating season compounded by an unusually hot summer / cooling season.

EU ETS Variation in 2018 saw the addition emission sources for Queens Island Permit (UN-N-IN-12121)

14

Energy Monitoring

Site energy consumption reports are generated weekly & monthly by the energy department via an online energy management tool and distributed to all Production Managers (Figure 6.0). Information is reviewed and fed back at Environmental Working Groups. Opportunities for improvement are reported to the Energy Department and logged on the Register of Opportunities.

Monthly energy (Electricity) usage reports for use at environmental working groups:

Figure 6.0

Any issues or discrepancies with the data will be discussed at the site’s EWG meeting to identify causes of the abnormal consumption and potential corrective actions. Energy monitoring is an essential tool in providing visibility to the main stakeholders and managers across the sites. The Queen’s Island site was registered and is fully compliant under the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS). An energy survey was completed in 2015 and due for reassessment by end of 2019. The identified opportunities have been incorporated into the organisation ‘Opportunities Register’ for progression.

Equipment Upgrades

2018 has seen the continued upgrading of equipment to more energy efficient systems where necessary. Specific projects completed this year include;

1. Installation of efficient gas boilers at Engineering Building

2. Further installation of LED lighting to replace standard lighting. LED lighting uses far less energy to provide the same LUX levels of lighting in areas at Clinty.

3. Additive added to the heating system to increase efficiency of the heating system and reduce gas consumption. Engineering Building

15

Training

Energy Training overview with FM Shift Operators to highlight opportunities and raise awareness.

Figure 6.0 Sample training material – Green Energy Pyramid

Energy Management Essentials course for FM Services team to provide tools to better control Energy on Bombardier sites

Figure 7.0 Sample training material – Cost of compressed air leaks

16

7.3 Raw Material Review BA closely reviews the amount of raw material used at the facility by way of monitoring the ratio of input material to product output. Raw material use is reviewed on a continuous basis by a number of departments within the company, not only for environmental reasons but as a cost saving incentive. There are various initiatives employed by the company to track and minimise raw material use and waste, these are outlined in appendix IV. The report covers the period of 2016 – 2018. 7.4 Waste Minimisation Audit In accordance with condition 2.4.2.1 of the permit, BA conducted a waste minimisation audit to cover the period of 2016 – 2018. The report takes into account all landfill, recyclable and hazardous waste across the Main factory and C04 facilities. Waste reduction continues to be an important corporate target which is filtered down to all aspects of the business through the environmental team. Waste is continually monitored and reviewed and reduction initiatives are implemented where possible. This continuous monitoring and measurement ensures that waste reduction and minimisation is always a top priority for the company. The report can be found in appendix V. 7.5 Water Efficiency Audit The efficient use of water as a resource is a vital part of BA strategy for the future. The high cost of use and the overall increase in demand on this resource requires BA to continue the improvement plans already undertaken. Bombardier will continue to implement improvements on the chemical treatment lines where the majority of water is used and when sourcing new equipment, water efficiency will be assessed as part of the technical requirement document. The full audit report can be found in appendix VI. 7.6 Pollution Inventory Report (PIR) PIR report is in appendix VII. This report contains information on the emissions to air, land and water from the permitted facility; there are some variations in the report compared to 2017 figures;

o Water Cadmium emissions reduced by 83% Copper emissions reduced by 75% Chromium emissions reduced by 34% Nickel emissions reduced by 86% Zinc emissions reduced by 96%.

o Waste

Non-hazardous waste disposed increased by 7% Hazardous waste recovered reduced by 11% Other waste disposed (non-haz) reduced by 1% Other waste recovered (non-haz) increased by 8%

o Energy

17

Gas consumption increased by 13% Electricity consumption increased by 9% Oil consumption increased by 45% Water consumption increased by 40%. Increased rates at Queens Island, increased man hours (+5%) and an exceptionally cold Winter Q1 gave rise to these increases.

Appendix I – Water Emission Results

QI S1 & W1 Report 2018

Permit No P0135/06A

S1 RELEASES TO SEWER

Release Summary for Short Brother PLC

Permit Number: P0135/06A

Location: 3 Airport Road, Queens Island, Belfast, BT3 9DZ

Emissions Point: Main Factory Effluent Treatment Plant MFF1

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3,000

10

3

1

January 7.42 13.00 77.00 1.00 0.41 0.37

February 7.21 16.00 36.00 6.50 2.80 0.90

March 7.49 10.00 5.00 0.71 0.62 0.03

April 7.21 10.00 21.00 1.43 1.40 0.10

May 8.00 12.00 123.00 0.40 0.33 0.00

June 6.71 10.00 65.00 0.33 0.14 0.00

July 6.93 28.00 73.00 0.54 0.44 0.04

August 7.13 12.00 65.00 0.07 0.02 0.00

September 7.29 34.00 55.00 0.80 0.50 0.03

October 7.51 27.00 53.00 0.03 0.01 0.01

November 7.02 14.00 26.00 0.30 0.27 0.00

December 6.85 13.00 67.00 0.10 0.06 0.01

Note: Signed on behalf of the Operator. Date: 02/01/19


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Effluent Treatment Plant MFF3

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 7.32 10.00 804.00 0.06 0.03 0.00

April 7.79 16.00 528.00 0.08 0.01 0.00

July 7.28 10.00 2020.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

October 8.39 10.00 2520.00 0.02 0.01 0.00

Note:

Signed on behalf of the Operator.. Date: 02/01/19


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Vapour Blast (MFF4)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 7.68 83.00 36.00 0.02 0.01 0.00

April 8.06 120.00 7.00 0.06 0.01 0.00

July 7.99 79.00 14.00 0.65 0.02 0.00

October 8.34 36.00 31.00 0.01 0.01 0.00

Note:

Signed on behalf of the Operator. Date: 02/01/19


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Boiler House (Boiler Blow Down) PE1 (MFF5)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 7.83 16.00 26.00 0.02 0.01 0.00

April 9.20 110.00 36.00 1.09 0.02 0.00

July 8.36 33.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00

October 9.81 51.00 28.00 0.01 0.01 0.00

Signed on behalf of the Operator Date: 02/01/19


Permit No P0135/06A

W1 RELEASES TO WATER




Emissions Point: Main Factory Compressor 1 (MFS2)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 & ≤9

50

None Visible

January 6.74 42.00 None

April 6.27 17.00 None

July 6.46 11.00 None

October 6.05 10.00 None



Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Compressor 2 (MFS3)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 & ≤9

50

None Visible







Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Airport Factory Effluent Treatment Plant (AFF1)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3,000

10

3

1

January 7.80 27.00 49.00 1.10 0.01 0.02

February 8.80 37.00 52.00 1.10 0.01 0.02

March 7.20 40.00 15.00 0.83 0.31 0.00

April 7.61 15.00 27.00 0.87 0.29 0.00

May 8.70 240.00 24.00 0.44 0.04 0.00

June 7.88 11.00 11.00 0.73 0.24 0.00

July 7.92 120.00 16.00 2.24 0.36 0.01

August 7.89 88.00 15.00 0.73 0.25 0.01

September 8.08 140.00 32.00 1.40 1.10 0.01

October 9.30 260.00 39.00 0.20 0.12 0.01

November 8.20 59.00 19.00 0.20 0.19 0.00

December 8.36 16.00 5.00 0.03 0.02 0.00

Note



Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Airport Factory Compressor 3 (AFS2)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 and ≤9

50

None Visible






Appendix II – NIW Compliance Reports

Code: T34110 Form No. TE 34

Northern Ireland Water is a trademark of Northern Ireland Water Limited, incorporated in Northern Ireland, Registered Number: NI054463, Registered Office: Westland House, Old Westland Road, Belfast, BT14 6TE.

Page 1 of 1

Northern Ireland Water

Environmental Regulation

Westland House

40 Old Westland Road

Belfast

BT14 6TE

Tel: 03457 44 00 88

www.niwater.com

Bombardier Aerospace C04 Main Factory Airport Road Queen's Island Belfast BT3 9DZ

Your Ref:

Our Ref: T34110

Date: 31st January 2019 Dear Mr Conlon, Trade Effluent Compliance A recent compliance assessment has indicated that over the 12 month period, January to

December 2018, your discharge was deemed to be compliant, as 90% of all parameter

results, or above, were within the specified limits of your trade effluent Consent.

Please ensure that your trade effluent discharge is kept within the specified limits

throughout 2019.

If you have any queries or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me

on 028 90 354 813 extension 20283.

Yours faithfully Naomi Ferres Trade Effluent Officer

Date from :

Date to : Report Generated on :

Trade Effluent Sample Details

1-JAN-2018

31-DEC-2018 10:07:3829-Jan-19

Authorised by:Bombardier Aerospace -ETP C04 Sample Point

Bombardier Aerospace ETP C04

Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road

Queen's Island

Sample Date Sample ID Parameter Reason Code MaxMinUnitsValue

Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-18-268226107-Feb-2018 0.42 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34110TES-18-269288812-Apr-2018 0.82 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34110TES-18-272493224-May-2018 1.24 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34110TES-18-275102208-Aug-2018 0.01 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34110TES-18-278113101-Nov-2018 0.28 100mg/l as N

AmmoniaParameter Count 5

Average 0.6 mg/l as N


Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-18-268226107-Feb-2018 58.2 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-18-269288812-Apr-2018 83.6 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-18-272493224-May-2018 32.1 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-18-275102208-Aug-2018 23.28 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-18-278113101-Nov-2018 88.8 1000mg/l O2

Chemical Oxygen Demand SettledParameter Count 5

Average 57.2 mg/l O2


Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-18-268226107-Feb-2018 8.09 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-18-269288812-Apr-2018 8.01 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-18-272493224-May-2018 8.37 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-18-275102208-Aug-2018 8.53 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-18-278113101-Nov-2018 9.16 105pH value

Parameter Count 5Average


Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-18-268226107-Feb-2018 157 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-18-269288812-Apr-2018 157 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-18-272493224-May-2018 134 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-18-275102208-Aug-2018 111 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-18-278113101-Nov-2018 119 400mg/l

Suspended SolidsParameter Count 5

Average 135.6 mg/l


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-18-268226107-Feb-2018 886.7 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-18-269288812-Apr-2018 1077.014 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-18-272493224-May-2018 667.325 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-18-275102208-Aug-2018 872.725 10000ug/l

Page 1 of 2

All analysis is carried out according to the relevant NI Water inhouse methods

Result values in red bold type have failed their permitted consent conditions

Date from :



1-JAN-2018

31-DEC-2018 10:07:3829-Jan-19

Authorised by:Bombardier Aerospace -ETP C04 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road

Queen's Island


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-18-278113101-Nov-2018 1100 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals

Parameter Count 5Average 920.8 ug/l

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 2



Code: T34109 Form No. TE 34

Northern Ireland Water is a trademark of Northern Ireland Water Limited, incorporated in Northern Ireland, Registered Number: NI054463, Registered Office: Westland House, Old Westland Road, Belfast, BT14 6TE.

Page 1 of 1

Northern Ireland Water

Environmental Regulation

Westland House

40 Old Westland Road

Belfast

BT14 6TE

Tel: 03457 44 00 88

www.niwater.com

Bombardier Aerospace C97 Main Factory Airport Road Queen's Island Belfast BT3 9DZ

Your Ref:

Our Ref: T34109

Date: 31st January 2019 Dear Mr Conlon, Trade Effluent Compliance A recent compliance assessment has indicated that over the 12 month period, January to

December 2018, your discharge was deemed to be compliant, as 90% of all parameter

results, or above, were within the specified limits of your trade effluent Consent.

Please ensure that your trade effluent discharge is kept within the specified limits

throughout 2019.

If you have any queries or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me

on 028 90 354 813 extension 20283.

Yours faithfully Naomi Ferres Trade Effluent Officer

Date from :



1-JAN-2018

31-DEC-2018 10:06:2429-Jan-19

Authorised by:Bombardier Aerospace ETP C97 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road,

Queens Island,


Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-18-268225907-Feb-2018 0.01 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34109TES-18-269288612-Apr-2018 0.04 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34109TES-18-272493124-May-2018 0.05 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34109TES-18-275102108-Aug-2018 -0.02 100mg/l as NAmmonia AUDITT34109TES-18-278113001-Nov-2018 0.14 100mg/l as N

AmmoniaParameter Count 5

Average 0.0 mg/l as N


Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-18-268225907-Feb-2018 108.8 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-18-269288612-Apr-2018 64.6 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-18-272493124-May-2018 84.8 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-18-275102108-Aug-2018 41.2 1000mg/l O2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-18-278113001-Nov-2018 102.8 1000mg/l O2

Chemical Oxygen Demand SettledParameter Count 5

Average 80.4 mg/l O2


Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-18-268225907-Feb-2018 6.87 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-18-269288612-Apr-2018 7.48 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-18-272493124-May-2018 7.06 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-18-275102108-Aug-2018 7.44 105pH valueHydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-18-278113001-Nov-2018 7.43 105pH value

Parameter Count 5Average


Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-18-268225907-Feb-2018 5 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-18-269288612-Apr-2018 6 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-18-272493124-May-2018 54 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-18-275102108-Aug-2018 23 400mg/lSuspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-18-278113001-Nov-2018 12 400mg/l

Suspended SolidsParameter Count 5

Average 20.0 mg/l


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-18-268225907-Feb-2018 159.16 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-18-269288612-Apr-2018 1585.86 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-18-272493124-May-2018 299.64 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-18-275102108-Aug-2018 213.122 10000ug/l

Page 1 of 2



Date from :



1-JAN-2018

31-DEC-2018 10:06:2429-Jan-19

Authorised by:Bombardier Aerospace ETP C97 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road,

Queens Island,


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-18-278113001-Nov-2018 290 10000ug/lTotal Heavy Metals

Parameter Count 5Average 509.6 ug/l

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 2



Appendix III – Energy Efficiency Audit

QI Energy Efficiency Report 2018

P0135/06A

Energy Efficiency Report - Queen’s Island 2016 – 2018

Introduction

Due to the increased demands on natural resources worldwide, more and more focus is placed

on heavy resource users like industry to manage and where possible conserve consumption

of valuable resources such as energy. The report contains information relating to the site

energy consumption and a breakdown of usage. It also includes details of any new projects

designed to minimise energy use.

Data has been collated over the 3 year period through bills and metering. The information was

then used to generate reports to show energy use across the site. Plans from FM services and

each site’s environmental working group plan to minimise energy use have been included

(figure 2).

Energy Reduction Projects

Energy reduction and efficiency projects are normally identified and initiated by Plant

Engineering (FM and Projects) and then handed over to Operations and Maintenance to

continue to manage and implement. Energy efficiency has been a key focus for the company

over the past 3 years and are moving towards renewable energy sources where possible.

FM Energy Projects Queen’s Island Top Projects 2016 - 2018

i. Replace steam heating system at engineering building with LPHW gas heating

ii. Put in sensors to turn off external lights during the day across the site.

iii. Compressed air system audit to identify leaks and repair.

iv. Reduce steam boiler pressure from Central Boiler House. Estimated saving

10,000,000 kWh/yr.

v. Stop weekend working at satellite sites. Estimated saving 4,000,000 kWh/yr.

vi. Replace boiler 5 economiser to increase boiler efficiency. Estimated saving

1,000,000 kWh/yr.

vii. Weekly league table of energy users against budget sent out to all managers (figure

1).


P0135/06A

Figure 1. Energy performance league table

C04 Top Projects 2016 - 2018

i. LED lighting installed within the Clinty building

ii. Review compressed air distribution with aim to reduce compressed air when not

required.

iii. Review Nitrogen generation loading with aim to reduce.

Main Factory Top Projects 2016 - 2018

i. Switch to Nitrogen generation at night instead of during the day.

ii. Supply spray booth 4 in North End paint shop with compressed air from paint facility

compressor to maximise utilization of paint facility compressor.

iii. Improve BMS (building management system) temperature control by calibrating all

temperature sensors.


P0135/06A

Operations Energy Projects

Main Factory Assembly Energy Reduction Plan Example

Figure 2. Site by site environmental management plans for energy reduction

From 2017 to date, Environmental Working Groups no longer have dedicated targets to

reduce energy consumption at their sites. This is because FM (Facilities Management)

Services manage / track energy usage across the sites and are responsible for implementing

energy and cost reduction initiatives.

Energy is reviewed monthly through working groups with emphasis on site suggestions for

energy consumption channelled through the FM Site Lead, shift variance reporting, new or

planned processes which impact energy consumption and highlighting any anomalies.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

30-D

ec

06-J

an

13-J

an

20-J

an

27-J

an

03-F

eb

10-F

eb

17-F

eb

24-F

eb

03-M

ar

10-M

ar

17-M

ar

24-M

ar

31-M

ar

07-A

pr

14-A

pr

21-A

pr

28-A

pr

05-M

ay

12-M

ay

19-M

ay

26-M

ay

02-J

un

09-J

un

16-J

un

23-J

un

30-J

un

07-J

ul

14-J

ul

21-J

ul

28-J

ul

04-A

ug

11-A

ug

18-A

ug

25-A

ug

01-S

ep

08-S

ep

15-S

ep

22-S

ep

29-S

ep

06-O

ct

13-O

ct

20-O

ct

27-O

ct

03-N

ov

10-N

ov

17-N

ov

24-N

ov

01-D

ec

08-D

ec

15-D

ec

22-D

ec

NO. Who Days Status PDCA

1 P.M. 3

2 P.M. 3

3 P.M. 2

4 P.M. 3

5 P.M. 2

6 P.M. 2

7 P.M. 2

8 P.M. 3

9 P.M. 3

10 P.M. 3

11 P.M. 0

12 P.M. 3

31/12/16

Plant Engineering

EMP1 Reduce normalised energy consumption by 3% of 2013 levels in 2015 EMP MANAGER END DATESTART DATE

MASTERPLAN 2016 BUSINESS UNIT/FUNCTION DEPARTMENTCseries

Paul Miller 01/01/16

Switch off recrculation AHUs in LCA to reduce consumption

Develop Proposals to automate nitrogen air compressor shut

down and start up ON HOLD DUE TO 4 SHIFTS

Investigate potential to reduce nitrogen purity levels during

autoclave cures

Identify energy wardens for all areas & commence checks

(including audible air leaks)

Review lighting levels in all areas with a view to securing a

reduction

Review temperature & humidity settings with a view to securing

reduction

Review compressed air systems with a view to securing

savings. Leak detection completed weekly

Energy Generation from Solar PV Modules

Introduce a shut down and start up procedure for the Nitrogen

air compressors at weekends

Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16

Track energy consumption on E sight each month & report via

EWG

Establish additional load centres & issue names for all

Arrange E sight demo for additional personnel

Oct 16 Nov 16 Dec 16

Q2 Q3 Q4

Actions

Quarter

Month/Year

Week

Week starting Monday

TIMING

Q1

Apr 16 May 16 Jun 16 Jul 16 Aug 16 Sep 16


P0135/06A

Project Team Energy Projects

i. When sourcing new equipment energy efficiency is a key part of the technical

requirement document sent out to contractors.

ii. The paint spray booths and cure rooms are now directly gas heated instead of steam

and electricity.

iii. The energy from waste plant, biomass boilers and PV panels all help to reduce the

site’s reliance on fossil fuel sources through the renewable energy strategy.


P0135/06A

Energy Usage Figures 2016 - 2018

2016 2017 2018

Electricity (MWh) 26073 27048 28349

Gas (MWh) 51262 50455 56830

Oil (l) 22710 49475 70300

LPG (l) 10497 17449 20897 Table 1. Energy usage figures 2016 - 2018

Chart 1. Energy usage figures 2016 – 2018

Conclusion

2018 saw an increase across all fuel types when compared with 2017. This was mainly due increased heating requirements throughout Q1 of 2018, an unusually cold and prolonged heating season compounded by an unusually hot summer / cooling season. It was noted electricity consumption increased from 2016 – 2018. This is partly due to Treatments closure at Hawlmark with work being processed through C97 and Machine Shop. Metal profiling contracts from the CBR facility are now centralised within the Main Factory Fabrications area also. These are both large energy using processes which have resulted in an increase. Gas consumption remained consistent in 2017 compared to 2016. 2018 use is at the highest it’s been in 3 years. LPG rose with the introduction of forklifts changing from diesel.

The company will continue to focus on energy efficiency projects and the renewable energy strategy.

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

Electricity (MWh) Gas (MWh) Oil (l) LPG (l)

Main Factory and C04 Energy Use

2016 2017 2018

Appendix IV – Raw Material Review

Queen’s Island Raw Material Review 2019

P0135/06A

Raw Material Review – Queen’s Island

Introduction BA closely reviews the amount of raw material used at the facility by way of continuously

monitoring the ratio of input material to product output. There are various initiatives

employed by the company to track and minimise raw material use and waste, these are

outlined below. This report covers the period of 2016 – 2018.

Attrition Reporting

As can be seen from the attrition report for 2018 in appendix 1, each area in the company

record scrap parts and problems. Tickets are raised to ensure that the root cause for scrap is

identified and rectified before anymore parts can be lost. It is extremely important for BA to

track attrition as aircraft parts are generally made out of very expensive material (aluminium

or carbon fibre) and require a lot of processing, for example, chemical anodising and chemical

etching which are also costly and time consuming.

Parts may need to be scrapped due to a wide range of issues e.g.

Operator error

Equipment error

Material not up to specification from vendor

Chemical treatment problems

Metal work bending problems

The quality of aircraft parts is rigorously checked at every step of the process to reduce the

possibility of any faulty or defective parts being released from the site.

Lean engineering is one of the core principles within BA and therefore a lot of time and

resource is invested in optimising processes to use the least amount of raw material and

generate the least amount of waste. As new contracts or parts are added to the BA production

line then scrap may rise slightly while the bugs in the process are ironed out.


P0135/06A

REACh Committee

BA is one of the forerunners in Northern Ireland as regards the REACh regulations. BA has a

dedicated chemical management team who review all materials purchased against legal

requirements and best practise standards.

All products are required to be delivered with a European Safety Data Sheet, the product is

then reviewed by a number of in-house experts from each relevant department; H&S,

environment, waste and quality. Once all departments have reviewed the product it will

either be rejected or accepted. This is an on-going process as products are frequently

reclassified and new products are always coming in.

The company will review any up and coming legislation as part of the REACh process to

identify products in use which may become a banned substance or have restricted use. There

is continuing research by the Materials and Planning department to find replacements for

some of the more toxic chemicals used on the Belfast site, for example, investigations are

underway to find a replacement for the chromic acid used in the anodising treatment tanks

and low solvent alternatives to some of the cleaning solvents.

An overview of REACh at Bombardier is attached in appendix 2.

Design for the Environment

Part of BA’s corporate social responsibility plan is to implement Design for the Environment

(DfE) in all new products and to apply the process to existing products where feasible. The

goal of DfE is to develop aircraft which contribute to sustainable mobility. This entails

factoring in the environmental impacts of each product at the development phase,

throughout its life cycle and so that when the aircraft is at the end of its usable life that all

parts can be recycled.

DfE helps the company to produce environmentally compatible aircraft and anticipate any

future, more stringent legislation in this area.

Our DfE approach consists of the following elements:


P0135/06A

applying a lifecycle perspective - examining environmental impacts at the production, use and disposal stage of a product's lifecycle

maximizing recyclability and recoverability - using materials featuring high recyclability and a high recycled material content; marking plastic components and batteries according to associated standards as well as other components that need special end-of-life treatment

eliminating hazardous substances - screening out the presence of hazardous substances as well as related toxic emissions

ensuring transparent communication - communicating our products' environmental efficiency through Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) with complete transparency by applying associated ISO standards

investing in technologies - improving energy efficiency and reducing air emissions, resource consumption and waste

involving suppliers - ensuring our suppliers comply with our environmental, social and quality standards and, through our Supplier Code of Conduct, uphold UN Global Compact environmental requirements

DfE is being trialled on the design and construction of the Global Express machined bulkhead

in C97 and the Global Express skin panel in C04, flowcharts describing the processes are

attached in appendix 3.

Conclusion

Raw material use is reviewed on a continuous basis by a number of departments within the

company, not only for environmental reasons but as a cost saving incentive.

http://csr.bombardier.com/en/products/our-approach/environmental-product-declarations/transportation

http://www.bombardier.com/en/corporate/corporate-governance/supplier-code-of-conduct?docID=0901260d80093008

http://csr.bombardier.com/en/governance/united-nations-global-compact

http://csr.bombardier.com/en/governance/united-nations-global-compact


P0135/06A

Appendix 1 Attrition Report 2018


P0135/06A


P0135/06A

k0542341

Rectangle


P0135/06A

k0542341

Rectangle

k0542341

Rectangle

k0542341

Rectangle


P0135/06A

k0542341

Rectangle

k0542341

Rectangle


P0135/06A

Appendix 2 REACh Overview

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

REACH OVERVIEW

BA Belfast October 2018

Event: ISO 140001 Audit

Presenter: Angela Lyttle

Title: REACH Coordinator, Belfast

Date: November 2018

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Agenda

BELFAST INTEGRATED CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT - REACH +

BA BELFAST REACH IN A NUTSHELL (SUMMARY)

CHALLENGE – NO 1 REACH AUTHORISATION

REACH AUTHORISATION SUMMARY MATRIX

CHALLENGE – NO 2 BREXIT

2

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Now MSDS Online

SDS Management/Analysis

SDS Manifest Portfolio

Maintained

Data Integrity

System Development

Hazmat

ECHA

Chemical

Regulation

Tracking

Internal Supply

Chain Mapping

Impact

Assessments

IAEG WG5

Industry Wide

Supply Chain

Risk

Management

Information in the Supply Chain

Baerd-Gen-031 Communications and Data

Gathering

Governance of OEM BOM Supply Related

Information

Impact Assessments

Reportable Parts Listing for Granta

Recording MDFs in CMS

Belfast Integrated Chemical Management – REACH+

REACH High Level Task Outline and Dependency Diagram

Business Continuity

Core Belfast SDS Data

Regulatory Compliance

Industry Liaison

Supply Chain Liaison

SVHC Tracking

Belfast Products of Concern

Product Risks Identified

Liaison with Belfast

Stakeholders

Historical Use Data Recorded

Ensure Alignment with

Granta

IT Support Projects

Reportable Substances Calcs

Article 33 Declaration

Requirements

Chemical

Regulatory

Impact on

Belfast

Respond to Declaration

Requests from : Airbus,

Rolls-Royce , P&W, GE etc.

as required

Customer Liaison

P&C Interface

Granta

Approval Management

For On Site Materials

Montreal Legal

Approval /

Guidance

CMS & BW

Authorisation

Consortia

ADS UK

Hazmat

Support

IAEG WG8

Brexit

2a

42

1

3

6

8

2b

5

Downstream User

Notifications

Downstream User Notifications

to ECHA and Customers

- SVHCs are present

- >0.1% presence in articles

- 1 tonne per annum threshold

Authorised Uses Notifications to ECHA

Tonnage calcs submitted

> 1tonne per annum 7

REACH

AUTHORISATION

RAC & SEAC

Recommendations

Commission

Decisions

E, H&S Site

Engagement

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

BA Belfast REACH in a Nutshell (summary)

1. ECHA Chemical Regulation Tracking

We track ECHA regulatory updates

We pay a subscription for Yordas Live (was Chemtrac) for additional supporting substance related information

2. Chemical Regulatory Impact on Belfast

We regularly run SVHC information through our various databases to identify products of concern (i.e. those containing SVHCs)

We issue business related bulletins to communicate information on specific products with Annex 14 ingredients & continuity concerns

2a. Business Continuity Core Belfast SDS Data: We clash ECHA SVHC Cas #s against SDS ingredient information to extract a list of substances and mixtures that we provide in Belfast and assess the business impact involving many function teams

2b. Supply Chain Liaison:

We gather SVHC data from non BA Designed part manufacturers & clash the same ECHA SVHC Cas #s against information which we have gathered from our supply chain in the form of Material Declaration Forms (MDFs).

This allows us to communicate to our Customers per our legal obligation (Article 33 of REACH)

3. Article 33 Declaration Requirements

The Candidate List substance concentration threshold of 0.1% w/w applies to every article supplied.

The communication obligations arise from the presence of the Candidate List substance in the article.

We respond to Customer REACH Declaration Requests

Engineering use Granta as a tool for materials analysis of BA designed parts

4. Downstream User Notifications

We inform customers about the presence of SVHCs in the article we supply

We provide ‘safe use instructions’ as required

We calculate SVHC usage per annum

We will have to notify ECHA about our use of Authorised substances (REACH -IT)

4

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Our BA Belfast REACH in a Nutshell (summary)…….continued

5

5. Hazmat All new on site materials go through a multi-discipline assessment process for approval – REACH is an approver

New products are added to the SDS analysis and considered for business continuity purposes

6. Regulatory Compliance – Industry Liaison We are active members of IAEG (WG2 – Substitution/Replacement Technologies and WG5 – Authorisation Surveillance)

We participate in ADS UK Hazmat Meetings

We seek internal legal advice for external communications

7. REACH Authorisations Belfast Lead Team on REACH Authorisation

IAEG WG5 – Consortia

Track ECHA – submitted consultations

Interpret Recommendations and proposals

Advise internal stakeholders E,H&S about RMMs and OCs for continued use beyond Authorisation

8. Current Risk Monitoring – Brexit Engaged in IAEG WG8 (Brexit Impact) developments

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

No 1 Challenge

REACH Authorisation

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Challenge – No 1 Authorisation

7

We are dependent on a variety of products that contain SVHCs on Annex 14 of REACH and are therefore also dependent on

the applications for continued use of those products being approved by the Commission

There are various applications for Authorisation (consultation numbers) that are of interest to us and aerospace as a whole.

We monitor those consultations in relation to progress through the approval stages.

We provide an overview on an eRoom for all internal stakeholders to keep them informed of developments.

Each on site stakeholder group has had the task of preparing for the continued use of the applied for substances by taking

section 9 of the RAC and SEAC Recommendations and ensuring we comply with all RMMS and OCs now

Regular meetings on Authorisation Obligations post full approval will commence with these same stakeholders as soon as

one of the Authorisations in our supply chain is given full approval.

Our use must have as a minimum RMMs and OCs as outlined in section 9 of the RAC and SEAC recommendations and be

totally aligned with the final Commission Report (On site E, H&S will be responsible and accountable).

E, H&S will have to provide user data to allow Notifications to ECHA which will commence as required legally for Authorised

substances in use by us.

We will then be subject to discretionary HSE (UK Regulator) spot checks regarding the use of these products on our site.

We must comply – or we cannot buy!

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

REACH Authorisation Summary Matrix

8

\\aero\ukfs\it\reach\AUTHORISATION INFORMATION\COMPLIANCE for AUTH

SUBSTANCES\Authorisation Summary.xlsx

Authorisation Summary Matrix

Substance Name CAS Number Sunset Date Product Name Manufacturer Consortium

Consultation Number(s)

Covering Our Use

Recommended

Review Period

Lead Applicant

Name Current StatusDibutyl phthalate (DBP) 84-74-2 21/02/2015 PL-8 Vishay No NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTLead sulfochromate yellow 1344-37-2 21/05/2015 PROMASTIC 600 CT PART A BASE Manor Coatings No NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFAST

Lead chromate molybdate sulfate red 12656-85-8 21/05/2015 PROMASTIC 600 CT PART A BASE Manor Coatings No NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFAST

Chromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 Bonderite M-CR ALCRM1200 Henkel 0032-02 7 Years Lanxess Opinion AdoptedChromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 Bonderite M-CR ALCRM1500 Henkel 0032-02 7 Years Lanxess Opinion AdoptedChromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 Chromic Acid Solution Brenntag 0032-02 0032-04 7 Years Lanxess Opinion AdoptedChromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 Chromic Conversion Coating for Cadmium SIFCO N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTChromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 H-Cement Vishay N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTChromium trioxide 1333-82-0 21/09/2017 H-Cement Thinner Vishay N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFAST

Chromic acid 7738-94-5 21/09/2017 Bonderite M-CR 1001 AERO Henkel CTAC0032-02

0032-047 Years Lanxess Opinion Adopted

Sodium dichromate 10588-01-9 21/09/2017 Sodium Chromate Solution 60% Brenntag CTAC 0043-02 7 Years Brenntag Opinions AdoptedSodium dichromate 10588-01-9 21/09/2017 Chromating Salt SLOTOPAS SL 11 Dr. Ing. Max Schlotter NOT REQUIRED N/A N/A EXEMPTION ASSUMED FOR LAB Sodium dichromate 10588-01-9 21/09/2017

Chromic Conversion for Cadmium SIFCO N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFAST

Sodium dichromate 10588-01-9 21/09/2017 Chromic Conversion Coating for Cadmium SIFCO N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTSodium dichromate 7789-12-0 21/09/2017 Same as CAS Number: 10588-01-9 (See Above) Potassium dichromate 7778-50-9 21/09/2017 LCI 400 CSB/COD/DCO Hach Lange N/A NOT REQUIRED N/A N/A EXEMPTION ASSUMED FOR LAB Potassium dichromate 7778-50-9 21/09/2017 Potassium Dichromate Fisher Scientific N/A NOT REQUIRED N/A N/A EXEMPTION ASSUMED FOR LAB Dichromium tris(chromate) 24613-89-6 22/01/2019 Bonderite M-CR 1132 AERO Henkel CTAC 0045-02 7 Years Henkel Opinions AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 10P20-13 High Solids Epoxy Primer Akzo Nobel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 10P4-2NF Fluid Resistant Epoxy Primer Akzo Nobel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 10P20-44; High Solids Epoxy Primer Akzo Nobel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 463-12-8 Fluid Resistant Primer, Green (065724) Akzo Nobel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 Aerodur HS Primer 37092, green 059132 BAC 452 Akzo Nobel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 Scotch-Weld EC-3960 Structural Adhesive Primer 3M CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 Hysol EA 9257 Gal Henkel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 Hysol EA 9258.1 5 Gal Henkel CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 515X349 Curing Solution PPG CCST 0046-02 7 Years Akzo Nobel Opinion AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 BR 6747-1 Water Based Primer, 20-40% Solids Cytec GCCA 0117-01 7 Years Wesco Aircraft Opinions AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 BR 6750 Water Based Primer 20% Solid Cytec GCCA 0117-01 7 Years Wesco Aircraft Opinions AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 BR 127 Corrosion Inhibiting Primer, 10% Solids Cytec GCCA 0117-01 7 Years Wesco Aircraft Opinions AdoptedStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 High Solids Corrosion Resistant Epoxy Primer, Green (CM0483928) Sherwin-Williams N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTStrontium chromate 7789-06-2 22/01/2019 HI-SOLIDS YELLOW EPOXY PRIMER Hentzen N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFASTPotassium hydroxyoctaoxodizincatedichromate 11103-86-9 22/01/2019 CELEROL Wash Primer 913-21 0113 gelbgrun / yellow green Mankiewicz

Potassium hydroxyoctaoxodizincatedichromate 11103-86-9 22/01/2019 P99 Wash Primer Yellow PPG Industries CCST 0047-02 7 Years PPG Industries Opinion Adopted

Potassium hydroxyoctaoxodizincatedichromate 11103-86-9 22/01/2019 Metaflex FCR Primer, Yellow Akzo Nobel N/A NO AUTHORISATION COVER N/A N/A BANNED FOR USE IN BELFAST

Pentazinc chromate octahydroxide 49663-84-5 22/01/2019 463-6-4 Aluminized Epoxy Primer Akzo Nobel CCST 0118-02 7 Years Aviall Services Inc. Opinion Adopted

Pentazinc chromate octahydroxide 49663-84-5 22/01/2019 CELEROL Wash Primer 913-21 0113 gelbgrun / yellow green Mankiewicz CCST 0118-02 7 Years Aviall Services Inc. Opinion Adopted

1-bromopropane (n-propyl bromide) 106-94-5 04/07/2020 ENSOLV 5408 Enviro Tech Ltd N/ANOT REQUIRED - BUSINESS

DECISIONN/A N/A

ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY

FOUND4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR-1422 A1/2, Part A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR-1422 B1/2, Part A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR-1435, Part A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR 1771 B2 PART A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR 1773 B 1/2 PART A PPG EAAC NO APPLICATION EVIDENT TBD TBD POSSIBLE

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR 1773 B2 PART A PPG

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PR 1776M B 1/2 PART A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PS 890 C 24 PART A PPG4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 PS 890 C 48 PART A PPG

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated 9036-19-5 04/01/2021 AC-930 DEFOAMER AC Products Company N/A NO APPLICATION INTENDED N/A N/AWILL BE BANNED FOR USE IN

BELFAST

4-Nonylphenol, branched and linear, ethoxylated 127087-87-0 04/01/2021 Electrolyte Marking Ink (EM16A) Indestructible Paint N/A NO APPLICATION INTENDED N/A N/AWILL BE BANNED FOR USE IN

BELFAST

CTAC

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

REACH Authorisation Update - Sept 2018

9 This information needs shared by Eco Design to all BA business units

Committees’ opinions on applications for authorisation available September 2018

The consolidated opinions of the Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC) are available on

the ECHA website for:

three uses of chromium trioxide (EC 215-607-8, CAS 1333-82-0) by HAPOC GmbH & Co KG.;

two uses of pentazinc chromate octahydroxide (EC 256-418-0, CAS 49663-84-5) by Aviall Services Inc and Finalin

GmbH; and

one use of dichromium tris(chromate) (EC 246-356-2, CAS 24613-89-6) by Wesco Aircraft EMEA, LTD;

one use of strontium chromate (EC 232-142-6, CAS 7789-06-2) by Wesco Aircraft EMEA, LTD; PPG Central (UK) Ltd in

its legal capacity as only representative of PRC DeSoto International Inc. –OR5; and Cytec Engineered Materials Ltd in its

legal capacity as only representative of Cytec Industries Inc. (THIS IS THE GCCA APPLICATION WHICH INCLUDES

BONDING PRIMERS)

The 3 substances above in red are of interest to us.

Each of them have been given a recommended 7 year review period (or extension beyond the sunset date).

Site checks need to be carried out by E,H&S teams to ensure we are compliant with the guidance outlined in section 9 of the RAC and SEAC joint recommendations.

All RMMS and OCs must be in line with the guidance or we need to cease using the products– it is therefore essential that all evidence is gathered by E,H&S to show compliance going forward.

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

No 2 Challenge

BREXIT

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Challenge – No 2 BREXIT

11

Industry guidance and engagement – via IAEG WG8 & UK ADS Hazmat Group

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.

Q&A?

12

PR

IVA

TE

AN

D C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L

© B

om

bard

ier

Inc. or

its s

ubsid

iarie

s. A

ll rig

hts

reserv

ed.


P0135/06A

Appendix 3 DfE Flowchart on Global Express in C97 and C04


P0135/06A


P0135/06A


P0135/06A


P0135/06A

Appendix 4 DfE Environmental Product Declaration

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION DID No: BM3010.03.43.01

REVISION: B

DATE: 2016-04-29

PAGE: 1 of 3

BT0027-01 MW REV 2015-04 © 2016 Bombardier Inc.

THIS DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID) GIVES INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO STANDARDIZE THE FORMAT AND TECHNICAL CONTENT OF A BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE DELIVERABLE. USE THIS DID FOR ANYONE THAT PRODUCES A DELIVERABLE, WHICH MUST BE INCLUDED IN A DELIVERABLE REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT (DRD) OR OTHER CONTRACT DELIVERABLE.

1 RESPONSIBILITY 2 DID TITLE

DFEN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ON MANUFACTURING COMPONENTS

3 DELIVERABLE PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION

The Environmental Data on Manufacturing Components deliverable provides data in order to perform an environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on a Bombardier Aerospace (BA) product. The purpose of an LCA is to calculate the resource consumption and environmental impacts of a BA product throughout its life cycle. The process used to assess the environmental impacts of the product (from extraction and manufacture of materials, to the end-of-life) is based on [1] ISO 14040:2006 and [2] ISO 14044:2006. The results will allow BA to understand the environmental footprint of the product. Doing a Life Cycle Assessment on BA products enables BA to:

support our commitment towards Corporate Social Responsibility and BA Health, Safety, and Environmental Policy

understand and improve the environmental performance of BA products by integrating environmental criteria as early as possible in the design phase

be in the lead in terms of design for environment in the aerospace industry where the Life Cycle approach is becoming increasingly important

In order to help BA meet this goal, suppliers are asked to give data related to their products. The information requested includes:

material inventory of final components

energy and water consumption

waste generated during the manufacturing process

Bombardier Aerospace is responsible to do the life-cycle assessment of their products. Suppliers can be asked to give details on specific items, if required.

4 DELIVERABLE PREPARATION STANDARDS AND OTHER REFERENCES

BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE DOCUMENTS

BM3010.03.28.02 Mass Status Report

BM3010.03.59.01 DMC Predictive Analysis

BM7043.03.10.01 Marking Polymers for End-of-Life Identification

BP-00075 Environmental Data on Manufacturing Components

OTHER DOCUMENTS

[1] ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework

[2] ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

032802.pdf

035901.pdf

../BM7043/031001.pdf

../Boiler/BP-00075.xlsm


REVISION: B

DATE: 2016-04-29

PAGE: 2 of 3


(CONTINUED)

BA Bombardier Aerospace LCA Life Cycle Assessment

BOM Bill of Material WP Work Package

DID Data Item Description

EPD Environmental Product Declaration

5 DELIVERABLE FORMAT AND GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL

Use BP-00075 to fulfill the needs of this deliverable. This boilerplate is a MS Excel file containing 6 tabs to be filled by the supplier: Supplier Info, Checklist, Materials, Energy and Water Inputs, S & L Outputs, and End of Life.

The cut-off rules were setup to help make the breakdown of components easy. Only material contained in final components that will fly must be included. Type Specification data is included in the LCA study. Options data are not included by default. However, BA may request the supplier to give data for Options to issue customized EPD.

Information on the energy and waste from subtier suppliers is not needed, except if a significant part of a work package is outsourced and manufactured in one facility (> 20% w/w of the total WP). The material breakdown is needed for all components that are part of the entire work package, even though it is provided by subtier suppliers. If a supplier has several facilities where different parts are manufactured, only the energy from the final assembly facility is included. In that case, the other facilities will become subtier suppliers then the previously described cut-off rule applies.

Material information is used to assess the environmental footprint at the extraction phase. Energy consumption and waste data are used to assess the footprint at the component manufacturing and assembly phase.

Use the generic boilerplate BP-00075 to create the environmental data. The boilerplate has a predefined structure, content, and formulas. The instructions on how to fill the boilerplate are identified on the first page of BP-00075.

6 DELIVERABLE TECHNICAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. SCOPE

This deliverable is needed more than once and must be regularly updated, as the program evolves. The accuracy of the data must improve through the different phases of the program. Data recorded from suppliers is kept internally and is not shared with any other external units.

2. REQUIREMENTS

BP-00075 must have the same level of detail as the last Mass Status Report (see BM3010.03.28.02 for more details).

BOM is requested to the level of detail defined in BM3010.03.59.01.





032802.pdf

035901.pdf


REVISION: B

DATE: 2016-04-29

PAGE: 3 of 3


(CONTINUED)

3. TECHNICAL CONTENT

3.1 SUPPLIER INFORMATION

Fill this tab with specific information on the supplier.

3.2 CHECKLIST

This list is to ensure the quality of the delivered boilerplate by the supplier.

3.3 MATERIALS

Fill this tab with specific information on the materials in the WP.

To facilitate reuse and recycle of polymers, Bombardier encourages its suppliers to mark the polymers used in the materials. See BM7043.03.10.01 for more information on polymer marking.

3.4 ENERGY AND WATER INPUTS

Fill this tab with the quantities of energy and water used by the supplier.

3.5 SOLID AND LIQUID OUTPUTS

Fill this tab with the quantities of waste produced by the supplier.

../BM7043/031001.pdf

Appendix V – Waste Minimisation Audit

Queen’s Island Waste Minimisation Audit 2019

P0135/06A

Waste Minimisation Audit – Queen’s Island 2016 – 2018

Introduction In accordance with condition 2.4.2.1 of the permit, we have conducted a waste minimisation audit to cover the period of 2016 – 2018. The report takes into account all landfill, recyclable and hazardous waste across the Main factory and C04 facilities. Main Factory

2016 2017 2018

General Waste 129.95 115.8 117.6

Hazardous 53.43 156.31 136.53

Direct Hours worked 1,738,794 1,638,146 1,544,337

Tonnes/200000hrs

General Waste 353.8 316.63 299.77

Hazardous 214.19 664.14 751.32

Total 567.99 980.77 1051.09

Table 1. Main factory waste figures

Chart 1 & 2: Main factory general waste absolute and normalised


P0135/06A

Chart 3 & 4: Main factory hazardous waste absolute and normalised

Chart 5: Main factory total waste normalised


P0135/06A

C04

2016 2017 2018

General Waste 116.56 83.76 71.28

Hazardous 23.03 29.18 24.23

Direct Hours worked

343,600 290,945 260,350

Tonnes/200000hrs

General Waste 858.93 629.65 558.73

Hazardous 134.4 172.06 192.28

Total 993.33 801.71 751.01

Table 2: C04 waste figures

Chart 6 & 7: C04 general waste absolute and normalised


P0135/06A

Chart 8 & 9: C04 hazardous waste absolute and normalised

Chart 10: C04 total waste normalised


P0135/06A

Summary of Figures

Main Factory general waste decreased by approx. 15 tonne in 2018 vs 2016. This can be attributed

to improved recycling, increased awareness and the internal waste audits conducted by the Waste

Supervisor. It is worth mentioning new waste generating processes such as Vapour Blast and Barrel

Rumbling have added an estimated 10 tonne per annum which is included in the overall figure. The

normalised general waste chart (Chart 2) shows a good decrease in waste generated in this tri-

annual reporting period.

Hazardous waste has increased in the Main Factory since 2016 with a marked increase noted from

2016 to 2017. This is a result of increased production from the CBR Facility in Newtownards which

closed in 2016. A revamp of the Machine Shop profiling and coolant recycling equipment resulted in

floor pits, sumps and gullies needing cleaned which added considerable volumes of coolant to the

total for 2017 also. Since then, a greater emphasis on improving coolant recycling has resulted in

reduced raw material being purchased therefore less waste. Waste coolant evaporation is also

monitored monthly by the Environmental Dep which has led to waste being evaporated twice maybe

three times where possible. Normalised waste figures for hazardous waste show an increasing trend

as explained above. (Chart 4)

C04 general waste has decreased steadily since 2016, from approx. 117 tonne to approx. 71 tonne in

2018. This is attributed to a marked decrease in labour hours at that facility as well as improved

recycling, increased awareness and the internal waste audits conducted by the Waste Supervisor.

Normalised waste data for general waste also mimics this trend as demonstrated in chart 7.

Hazardous waste has remained fairly constant since 2016. Although a reduced number of training

hours have contributed to this, throughput has remained steady. This can be demonstrated in Chart

9. All up as a facility, normalised total waste has reduced by approx. 250 tonne since 2016.

Carbon Fibre Composite Waste

For some years now, Bombardier have been striving to provide the market with more fuel efficient,

lower noise impact and lower emission generating aircraft. This journey presents a new challenge; as

the organisation transitions from reliance on traditional metal structure towards more lightweight

carbon fibre based composite material, the volume of carbon based waste streams has

increased. Through technology and improved scheduling, significant improvements have been made

in specifying materials and cutting material to minimise waste. Carbon and composite materials are

notoriously difficult waste streams. In the past year we have been actively exploring reuse outlets

for our materials to ensure we maintain our excellent landfill diversion rates. We have diverted over

20tonnes of carbon & carbon fibre composite material into reuse programmes so far in 2018. In the

next 12 months we will be focused on securing viable outlets for the material.


P0135/06A

Waste Audits

There have been continuing waste audits by the environmental team over the past 3 years to try and

identify areas where there are issues with waste segregation and to find alternative recycling

streams. The audits are circulated to all the managers in the facilities and discussed at the

environmental working groups. The following audits can be found in appendix 1:

Main Factory Fabs 18/09/18

C04 10/04/18

Recycling Arrow Reports

Each site has a number of dedicated recycling stations which are checked on a daily basis by the

onsite waste contractor. The recycling stations all have recycling arrows (figure 1) attached to a

nearby noticeboard, these arrows are marked up on a daily basis as green for all bins compliant or

red of there is any cross contamination, which can either be recyclables in the general waste bins or

general waste in the recycling bins, a short explanation is written on the back of the arrow if any

non-compliances are picked up.

Figure 1. Blank recycling arrow

At the end of each month all the recycling arrows for each area are collected and a monthly report is

compiled and communicated to each site via the environmental working group. A 2018 report for

WPU is included in appendix 2 of this report. These are then reviewed and discussed at the

environmental working groups in each area.

Revised Waste Reports

Waste reports took a new format in 2016. The reports are more visual with detailed breakdowns

available for general, recycled, hazardous and total waste. These are available to view via the

Intranet ‘Bnet’ and communicated at Environmental Working Groups.


P0135/06A

Figure 2. Main factory fabrications 2018 EMP for Hazardous Waste

Environmental Management Programs (EMP)

As part of the ISO14001 environmental working groups sites are set waste reduction targets related

to reducing landfill waste, increasing recycling and reducing hazardous waste production. These

targets are achieved at a site level through environmental management programs. The working

groups will identify areas which they feel they can directly influence and achieve improvements. The

initiatives are recorded on EMPs and tracked throughout the year. Examples of the site programs

over the last 3 years are shown below in figures 2 – 4.

BOMBARDIERselect report detail SITE: REPORT: Year to date

NON HAZARDOUS WASTE

GENERALW WOOD FOODWASTE PLASTIC CARDBOARD PAPER

ACTUAL 22.36 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00

NORMALISED 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00

CARBON FIBRE METAL

AUTOCLAVE

BAGGING

WHITE NYLON

BREATHER MASKANT

GREEN PET

BREATHER

ACTUAL 0.00 667.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NORMALISED 0.00 340.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FILTER CAKE (non) ABRASIVES (non) PFD (non) CARBON (Re-use)

ACTUAL 12.32 13.82 15.04 0.00

NORMALISED 6.28 7.05 7.67 0.00

HAZARDOUS WASTE

OIL & WATER PFD ALKALI ACID COOLANT HYDAULIC OILS SOLVENTS

ACTUAL 5.44 0.00 11.90 0.00 72.12 0.00 4.51

NORMALISED 2.77 0.00 6.07 0.00 36.77 0.00 2.30

PAINT WASTE

(liquid)

PAINT WASTE

(solid) OILY RAGS RTM MISC RESIN

ACTUAL 4.20 12.89 2.30 0.00 1.20 0.00

NORMALISED 2.14 6.57 1.17 0.00 0.61 0.00

INK CARTRIDGES BATTERIES ACID RAGS WEEE AEROSOLS LAB SMALLS

ACTUAL 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.72 0.04 0.00

NORMALISED 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.88 0.02 0.00

ABRASIVE MEDIA OIL & DIESEL PACKAGING SOLVENT RAGS FILTER CAKE (haz) TOTAL HAZ

ACTUAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116.34

NORMALISED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.31

MAIN FACTORY FABRICATION

WASTE REPORT

3%0%

0%0%

0%

0%0%

91%

0%0%0%0%2%2%2%

Non-Haz Waste BreakdownGENERALWWOODFOODWASTEPLASTICCARDBOARDPAPERCARBON FIBREMETALAUTOCLAVE BAGGINGWHITE NYLON BREATHERMASKANTGREEN PET BREATHERFILTER CAKE (non)ABRASIVES (non)PFD (non)

0% 11%0%

65%

0%4%

4%

12%2%0%1%0%0%0%0%2%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%

Haz Waste BreakdownPFDALKALIACIDCOOLANTHYDAULIC OILSSOLVENTSPAINT WASTE (liquid)PAINT WASTE (solid)OILY RAGSRTMMISCRESININK CARTRIDGESBATTERIESACID RAGSWEEEAEROSOLSLAB SMALLSABRASIVE MEDIAOIL & DIESELPACKAGING


P0135/06A

Figure 3. Main factory fabrications 2018 EMP for Hazardous Waste

Figure 4. C04 2014 EMP for reduction of hazardous waste

Conclusion

Waste reduction continues to be an important corporate target which is then filtered down to all

aspects of the business through the environmental team. Waste is continually monitored and

reviewed and reduction initiatives are implemented where possible. This continuous monitoring and

measurement ensures that waste reduction and minimisation is always a top priority for the

company.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

02-Jan

09-Jan

16-Jan

23-Jan

30-Jan

06-F

eb

13-F

eb

20-F

eb

27-F

eb

06-M

ar

13-M

ar

20-M

ar

27-M

ar

03-A

pr

10-A

pr

17-A

pr

24-A

pr

01-M

ay

08-M

ay

15-M

ay

22-M

ay

29-M

ay

05-Jun

12-Jun

19-Jun

26-Jun

03-Jul

10-Jul

17-Jul

24-Jul

31-Jul

07-A

ug

14-A

ug

21-A

ug

28-A

ug

04-S

ep

11-S

ep

18-S

ep

25-S

ep

02-O

ct

09-O

ct

16-O

ct

23-O

ct

30-O

ct

06-N

ov

13-N

ov

20-N

ov

27-N

ov

04-D

ec

11-D

ec

18-D

ec

25-D

ec

NO. Who Days Status PDCA

1 JG 2

2 JG 2

3 JG 2

4 MF 3

5 AB 0

6 AB 2

7 MM 3

8 AB 0

9 JG 3

EMP MANAGER David Mcclelland START DATE 01/01/18

Mar 18 Apr 18

MASTERPLAN 2018 BUSINESS UNIT/FUNCTION Main Factory Fabs DEPARTMENT

TIMING

Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3

May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 Nov 18 Dec 18

END DATE 31/12/18EMP1 Reduce normalised hazardous waste by 10% of 2017 levels in 2018

Sep 18 Oct 18

Actions

Review the paint waste process

Q4

Month/Year

Week


Jan 18 Feb 18

Crush paint cans to reduce the amount of waste leaving site.

Paint waste PCS

Plan waste for shut downs

Coolant waste at machine shop

Installation of coolant tanks to reduce waste

Can crusher to be moved to fully implement paint protocol

New evaporator

Paint protocol training

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

02-J

an

09-J

an

16-J

an

23-J

an

30-J

an

06-F

eb

13-F

eb

20-F

eb

27-F

eb

06-M

ar

13-M

ar

20-M

ar

27-M

ar

03-A

pr

10-A

pr

17-A

pr

24-A

pr

01-M

ay

08-M

ay

15-M

ay

22-M

ay

29-M

ay

05-J

un

12-J

un

19-J

un

26-J

un

03-J

ul

10-J

ul

17-J

ul

24-J

ul

31-J

ul

07-A

ug

14-A

ug

21-A

ug

28-A

ug

04-S

ep

11-S

ep

18-S

ep

25-S

ep

02-O

ct

09-O

ct

16-O

ct

23-O

ct

30-O

ct

06-N

ov

13-N

ov

20-N

ov

27-N

ov

04-D

ec

11-D

ec

18-D

ec

25-D

ec

NO. Who Weeks Status PDCA

1 MS 52 2

2 OTMs 52 2

3 EWG 52 2

4 EWG 52 2

5 52 2

6 OTMs 1 2

7 MS 2

Feb 18 Mar 18

Review monthly waste reports as part of row 1 metric at monthly review

Review and identify opportunities for improvement

Rubber Maskant Recycling plan

Communicate waste performance at DMM

Review Veolia waste mangement plan and targets

Jan 18 Oct 18

Quarter

Month/Year

Week


TIMING

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Actions

Nov 18 Dec 18Apr 18 May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 Sep 18

PCS checks carried out as part of DMM process

Waste audit carried out by Mark Stewart

MASTERPLAN 2018 BUSINESS UNIT/FUNCTION DEPARTMENTC04 Airport West

Paul Foy 01/01/18 31/12/18EMP1 Non hazardous waste reduction by 10% Actual EMP MANAGER END DATESTART DATE


P0135/06A

Appendix 1 Waste Segregation Audits – Main Factory Fabs 2018 & C04 2018

REF No. March-001

Waste Audit Assessment Date: 10/04/2018

Contractor: Contact No. 07557374462

Task:

Site: BOMBARDIER

Area:

Location:

Nominated Person: MARK STEWART MARK STEWART

Stage of works at audit (i.e. % complete):

1 Y2 Y3 Y4 N5 Recycling Station (1) Are goal-post in place? Y6 Y7 Y8 N

9 Y10 Y11 Y12 N13 Recycling Station (Back paint) Are goal-post in place? Y14 N15 Y16 N

17 Y18 Y19 Y20 N21 Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Are goal-post in place? Y22 N23 Y24 N

25 Are any contaminated bins being communicated on the HSE action register?N

26 Y27 Y28 N29 Y

Auditor Print Name:

Signature:

Contractor Print Name :

Signature:

Item

14/22

25

External bins - Are bins in good working condition?

External bins - Any contamination in the bin?

External bins - Is housekeeping being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

External bins - Are bins in the correct location?

There is no recycling arrow. (MS to arrange to have arrow in place) CLOSED 10/04/2018

Cannot find HSE register for the back paint shop. ( MS to tie up with Neil Bennet)

Recycling Station (Back paint) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

Comments

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Are all the bins labelled?

Recycling Station (Chemi-mill) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station (1) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station (1) Are all the bins labelled?

Recycling Station (1) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station (1) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station (1) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station (1) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station (Back paint) Are all the bins labelled?

REF. No. ASSESSMENT FACTOR:- (5) Very Good; (4) Good; (3) Average; (2) Poor; (1) Very Poor. Applicable

Yes(Y)

No(N)CRITERIA

Recycling Station (1) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station? C-Series ( Station 1)

VEOLIA

WASTE AUDIT

Main Factory

C04

REF No. Sept-001

Waste Audit Assessment Date: 18/09/2018

Contractor: Contact No. 07557374462

Task:

Site: BOMBARDIER

Area:

Location:

Nominated Person: MARK STEWART MARK STEWART

Stage of works at audit (i.e. % complete):

1 Y

2 Y

3 N

4 N

5 Recycling Station ( 74 ) Are goal-post in place? Y

6 Y

7 Y

8 N

9 Y

10 Y

11 N

12 N

13 Recycling Station ( 73 ) Are goal-post in place? Y

14 Y

15 Y

16 N

17 Y

18 Y

19 N

20 N

21 Recycling Station ( ERG ) Are goal-post in place? N

22 Y

23 Y

24 N

25 Are any contaminated bins being communicated on the HSE action register?Y

26 Y

27 Y

28 N

29 N

Auditor Print Name:

Signature:

Contractor Print Name :

Signature:

Item

3,11,19

21

29

External bins - Are bins in good working condition?

External bins - Any contamination in the bin?

External bins - Is housekeeping being kept to a high standard?

No goal posts in place however there is a notice board.

Fridge, wooden pallets needs removed. (Removed 20/09/2018)

No general waste lable on front of bin. (MS has now put labels on bins 18/09/2018)

Comments

Recycling Station (ERG ) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station (ERG ) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station ( ERG ) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

External bins - Are bins in the correct location?

Recycling Station (ERG ) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station?

Recycling Station ( ERG ) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station ( ERG ) Are all the bins labelled?

Recycling Station ( ERG ) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station ( 73 ) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station (73 ) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station ( 73 ) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

Recycling Station (73 ) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

Recycling Station (73 ) Are all the bins labelled?

REF. No. ASSESSMENT FACTOR:- (5) Very Good; (4) Good; (3) Average; (2) Poor; (1) Very Poor. Applicable

Yes(Y)

No(N)CRITERIA

Recycling Station ( 74 ) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station?

Recycling Station (74 ) Is ther any potential materials that could be diverted from general waste?

Recycling Station ( 73 ) Are all the bins located at Recycling Station?

Recycling Station ( 73 ) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station ( 74 ) Are all the bins standardized and in good conditions?

Recycling Station (74 ) Are all the bins labelled?

Recycling Station ( 74 ) Is there any contamination in the bins?

Recycling Station ( 74 ) Is the recycling arrow being marked up correctly?

Recycling Station (74 ) Is the housekeeping around the recycling station being kept to a high standard?

VEOLIA

WASTE AUDIT

FABS

MAIN FACTORY


P0135/06A

General Reycling % Days No Issues Comments General Reycling % Days No Issues Comments General Reycling % Days No Issues

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

21 23 96% 14 20 85% 22 22 100%

16 23 85% 18 20 95% 20 22 95%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 20 22 95%

22 23 98% 20 20 100% 18 22 91%

19 23 91% 20 20 100% 17 22 89%

23 23 100% 14 20 85% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 19 20 98% 22 22 100%

23 23 100% 19 20 98% 21 22 98%

LCA office 23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

LCA Tea-bay 23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

Tooling Tea-bay 23 23 100% 20 20 100% 22 22 100%

23 23 23 20 20 20 22 22 22

Average Overall % 99% 98% 99%

WORKING DAYS

PL1 - F Mckeown / G Stewart

PL2 - F Mckeown / G Stewart

A10 -A Butler

Assembly

A1 - G Small / I McKimm (T'Box)

A2 - G Small/ I McKimm (T'Box)

A7 - A Butler

A8 - A Butler

A3 - G Small/ I McKimm (T'Box)




A9 -A Butler

Fabrications

February MarchJanuary

Geoff Mitchell

PL3 -F Mckeown / G Stewart

PL4 -F Mckeown / G Stewart

PL5 & 6- F Mckeown / G Stewart

Geoff Mitchell

Geoff Mitchell

Chris O'Doherty

Keith Weir

Zone 6

Zone 7


P0135/06A

Appendix 2 Recycling Arrow Audit – WPU 2018

Appendix VI – Water Efficiency Audit

QI Water Efficiency Report 2019

P0135/06A

Water Efficiency Report - Queen’s Island 2016 -2018

Introduction This report presents our water efficiency audit findings for 2016-2018. During this time a

number of improvement projects were initiated in order to identify where and how energy

efficiency measures would be best met.

Metering analysis was conducted over a 3 year period at the Airport and Main site facilities.

In cases where the actual water use far exceeded the expected water usage, further studies

were undertaken to identify the reason for such discrepancies.

Bombardier Aerospace Belfast has an annual target to reduce water consumption by 5%,

based on 2013 figures whereas Bombardier has a corporate target. The target is cascaded

down to the business unit’s Environmental Working Groups (EWGs). These working groups

identify areas where both FM Services & Plant Engineering can implement fixes to reduce

water use. The environmental department are also very proactive in water reduction

initiatives. These are communicated at energy review meetings and also logged on a ‘Register

of Opportunities’.

The Queen’s Island site has seven fiscal water meters, which are supported with a further

sixteen sub meters. Data can be viewed remotely via an online energy reporting tool.

A summary of performance for the Queen’s Island complex for the period 2016-2018 is

presented in the following table;

Year Consumption (m3) Year on year

performance (%)

2016 106,499

2017 118,788 12% increase

2018 148,039 25% increase

The table shows that water consumption has significantly increased on the Queen’s Island

complex, with a rise in consumption of 39%.


P0135/06A

Improvement Projects

Improvement programmes and projects were started across the site to firstly identify any

potential losses in the system and where water use is excessive or could be improved in

general.

At the Airport Road West facility it was reported an approx. 20m3 per day of water entering

the site was unaccounted for. It was found that insufficient and inaccurate metering was a

root cause for discrepancy in data. This on-going project includes: validating existing

meters, replacing faulty meters, installing additional sub meters, identifying leaks, ensuring

data is collated regularly through eSight and drawings produced.

The following projects and plans form part of the triannual efficiency program.

Location - Centre 04

A Hydrocyclone and Advanced Media Filtration system as well as automated bleed and feed

controls were installed during 2015 to treat and remove solids and pollutants from the

solutions within rinse tanks in the line. In 2017 the rinse tanks moved from spray rinse to

immersion due to operational concerns. This resulted in a marked increase of 500% water

consumption. As a result, additional improvements have since been made to further optimise

the filtration system, the use of tank solutions and ultimately minimise discharge as waste.

2018 water consumption saw a reduction of 55%.

In 2016 an Isoprep Skid was installed at the Superbee tank 2 (Cleanline). This was previously

a bleed and feed system resulting in added trade effluent and increased water consumption.

Consumption is now virtually zero as a result.

This dramatically reduced the amount of solution being disposed of for treatment and as a

result significantly reduced water consumption.


P0135/06A

Centre 30 water consumption was noted at an Environmental Working Group as being

considerably high during weekend and non-production hours. Equated to approx. 40m3 per

day, 14,600m3 per annum. After further investigation it was found this water was not used

for production and on a loop direct to sewer.

Location - Centre 97

Install of a turco rinse skid at C97 in 2016 to recycle rinse waters from the Turco tank on the

Autoline resulted in the process going from a total loss system to 80% recovery has greatly

help cut consumption totals.

Conclusion

The efficient use of water as a resource is a vital part of BA strategy for the future. The high

cost of use and the overall increase in demand on this resource requires BA to continue the

improvement plans already undertaken. Bombardier will continue to implement

improvements on the chemical treatment lines where the majority of water is used and

when sourcing new equipment, water efficiency will be assessed as part of the technical

requirement document.

BA Belfast achieved an overall reduction of 6% for the period 2016 to 2018. BA will

continue to strive to reduce its water consumption further and has identified projects for

introduction during 2019 such as increased metering on plant and equipment, management

of change for all new plant and equipment to address such issues as consumption, water

recycling, waste etc.

Appendix VII – Pollution Inventory Report (PIR)

Q79/1 V0 Pollution Inventory Reporting

Pollution Inventory reporting form Annual releases to air, controlled waters, land and off-site transfers in wastewater and of waste The Pollution Prevention and Control (Industrial Emissions) Regulations (NI) 2013 Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR Regulations)

Please read through this form and the guidance notes carefully before you start to fill it in. You can get general and sector-specific guidance on completing this form from www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/pollution-home/pol-emission-reg.htm. To fill in this form you'll need:

• Details of your chemical releases to theenvironment • Details of your chemical transfers inwastewater • Details of your waste transfers• PI reporting guidance• Relevant sector specific guidance note (ifavailable)

We issue this form to enable collection of information from you annually on the quantities of specified substances released to air, waters and land, the quantities of specified substances transferred off-site in wastewater and the quantities of waste transferred off-site.

Once we have collected and processed the release and transfer data, it is made available to the general public through our Public Registers and submitted to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR).

Who is required to complete this form?

You need to complete this form if you operate a PPC process and are regulated by us or if you operate a process listed in Annex 1 of the E-PRTR Regulations.

Completed forms must be submitted to us by 31st January following each reporting year. Please see our website for further information on these requirements.

How to fill in the form? Everyone must fill in part 1. Then fill in the other parts of the form that apply to you. Finally, complete the qualification notes and the declaration on page 16.

Format of the PI form The form consists of eight parts:

• Part 1 - About the operator and site• Part 2 - Releases to air• Part 3 - Releases to land• Part 4 - Releases to waters• Part 5 - Off-site transfers in wastewater• Part 6 - Off-site waste transfers• Part 7 - Waste transfers to other countries• Part 8 - Qualification and declaration

However you send us the information, make sure you keep a copy for your own records.

http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/pollution-home/pol-emission-reg.htm





How to contact us If you need help filling in the form, please contact the person who sent you it or call our general enquiries number shown below. General enquiries: 02890 569299 (Mon–Fri 8–6) Email: [email protected] Website: www.doeni.gov.uk/niea If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, please tell us how we can improve it. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily.

The Data Protection Act 1998 We, the NI Environment Agency, will process the information you provide to create, maintain and publish your Pollution Inventory report, comply with the E-PRTR and so that we can:

• deal with your application;• make sure you keep to the conditions of thelicence, permit or registration; • process renewals; and• keep the public registers up to date.

We may also process or release the information to: • offer you documents or services relating toenvironmental matters; • consult the public, public organisations andother organisations; • carry out research and development work onenvironmental issues; • provide information from the public register toanyone who asks; • prevent anyone from breaking environmentallaw, investigate cases where environmental law may have been broken, and take any action that is needed; • assess whether customers are satisfied withour service, and to improve our service; and • respond to requests for information under theFreedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (if the Data Protection Act allows).

We may pass the information on to our agents or representatives to do these things for us.

Part 1 About you and your site 1.1 Authorisation, licence or permit number

1.2 Operator’s details Operator’s name - Authorisation, licence or permit holder

Site Name

Site Address

Postcode

1.3 Contact Details Title First Name Last Name Position

Contact numbers, please include area code Phone Fax Mobile Email

1.4 NACE and NOSE-P codes NACE codes refer to main economic activity. NOSE-P codes refer to release sources. See the associated guidance notes for specific codes.

• 4-figure NACE code for the maineconomic activity

• 5-figure NOSE-P code for the mainpolluting process carried out on site

• other relevant NOSE-P codes for otherpolluting processes on the site

2 of 16

P0135/06A

Bombardier

Queens Island

Airport Road,Queens Island,Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Dr

Colette

Eastwood

Environmental Manager

028 90733569

028 90733202

[email protected]

2 5 1 6

1 0 5 1 0

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/


1.5 Calendar year this report covers

The next five questions ask for information on a voluntary basis.

1.6 How many employees did you have at 31 December of the reporting year?

1.7 How long was your site operational for during the reporting year?

hours 1.8 What was the total annual output from your main economic activity during the reporting year? Product of the main activity

quantity Units used, for example kWh, tonnes:

1.9 What was your annual consumption of the following during the reporting year? Electricity MWh Gas MWh Oil MWh Coal MWh Water cubic metres

1.10 Please give your email and/or web address for enquiries from the public Email

Web

1.11 Confidentiality The form enables you to say whether you consider any (or all) of the information you are providing is confidential.

If you consider some of the information is confidential: • tick the appropriate box below• list any supporting documents submitted in the

appropriate box in the section below• tick the Confidentiality box next to the

appropriate items on the form.

If you claim confidentiality for all the information you give on the form: • you do not need to tick the Confidentiality box

for each release or transfer• tick the appropriate box in the Confidentiality

section below• please ensure your written justification covers

all the information given in the form• list any supporting documents submitted in the

appropriate box in the section below.If you do not enclose a written justification for each item included in the confidentiality claim, we are likely to reject it straight away. We will determine your claim for confidentiality within a period of 28 days from the date of the application or within an agreed longer period.

I am enclosing documents to prove that: • some of the information is confidential: I have

ticked the appropriate boxes on the form• all of the information is confidential

Please list the documents you are including to support your claim. Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

1.12 How to calculate releases to the environment When you fill in the reporting form: • your total release figure should include

fugitive and notifiable releases. If the totalrelease figure is below the reportingthreshold it should be reported as ‘brt’.

• you must provide a separate figure for anynotifiable releases and transfers if you hold apermit or authorisation which requiresspecific notification to us.

This does not apply to sites operating solely under a waste management licence. • write ‘n/a’ (not applicable) against

substances not released.

3 of 16

2018

28,349

56,830

70,300

162,420


Part 2 Releases to air * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:

• method M, C, E (measurement, calculation, estimation)• notifiable releases• detailed method

Metric units allowable are: kt (kilotonnes), t (tonnes), kg (kilogrammes), g (grammes), mg (milligrammes)

CAS no. Substance Reporting thresholds

in kg

Total releases (including notifiable releases) Notifiable releases Confidential? Justification must be provided

Common Name (Alternative Name)

n/a, brt or releases

Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 7664-41-7 Ammonia 1,000 1332-21-4 Asbestos 1

124-38-9 Carbon dioxide 10,000,000**

124-38-9 Carbon dioxide from qualifying renewable fuel source (reportable)

630-08-0 Carbon monoxide 100,000 74-90-8 Hydrogen cyanide 100

10024-97-2 Nitrous oxide 10,000 2551-62-4 Sulphur hexafluoride 10

Organics 309-00-2 Aldrin 1 120-12-7 Anthracene 10

71-43-2 Benzene 1,000 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 106-99-0 Butadiene (1,3-

Butadiene) 100

56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane)

10

57-74-9 Chlordane 1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 1

67-66-3 Chloroform (Trichloromethane)

100

50-29-3 Dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT)

1

75-09-2 Dichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene chloride)

1,000

60-57-1 Dieldrin 1 117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-

phthalate (DEHP) 10

72-20-8 Endrin 1 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride

(1,2-Dichloroethane) 1,000

75-21-8 Ethylene oxide (1,2-Epoxyethane)

1,000

76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 1 608-73-1 Hexachlorocyclo-

hexane- all isomers 1

4 of 16

t

kg

C

C

C_ETS

C_IPCC

32,069.00

35.40

t

kg

release

brt



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

193-39-5 Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene

1

58-89-9 Lindane 1 74-82-8 Methane 10,000 71-55-6 Methyl chloroform

(1,1,1-trichloroethane)

10

2385-85-5 Mirex 1 91-20-3 Naphthalene 100

608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 1 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 1 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethane

(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane)

10

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 100 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1

12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all isomers

1

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1,000 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1,000

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 10 7440-50-8 Copper 10 7439-92-1 Lead 100 7439-97-6 Mercury 1 7440-02-0 Nickel 10 7782-49-2 Selenium 100 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Chlorine & inorganic compounds- as HCl 10,000 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as I-TEQ

0.00001

Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as WHO-TEQ

0.00001

Fluorine & inorganic compounds - as HF 1,000 Halons 1 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) 1 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 100 Nitrogen oxides - NO & NO2 as NO2 100,000 Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs)

10,000

Particulate matter - PM2.5 1,000 Particulate matter - PM10 1,000 Particulate matter - total 10,000 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 10 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.1 Polychlorinated biphenyls as WHO-TEQ 0.00001 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

5

Sulphur oxides - SO2 & SO3 as SO2 100,000

5 of 16

100,000 Sulphur dioxide

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

17.52

114.45

2.88

0.09

0.15

69.97

828.93

2,360.48

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

releases

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt


Part 3 Releases to land * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 1

Organics 15972-60-8 Alachlor 1

309-00-2 Aldrin 1 120-12-7 Anthracene 1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 1 71-43-2 Benzene 200** 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 1

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 1 50-29-3 Dichlorodiphenyl-

trichloroethane (DDT) 1


10

60-57-1 Dieldrin 1 117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-

phthalate (DEHP) 1

330-54-1 Diuron 1 115-29-7 Endosuflan 1

72-20-8 Endrin 1 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 200** 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride

(1,2-Dichloroethane) 10


10

76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 1 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 1

608-73-1 Hexachlorocyclo-hexane- all isomers

1

193-39-5 Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene

1

34123-59-6 Isoproturon 1 58-89-9 Lindane 1

2385-85-5 Mirex 1

6 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 1 122-34-9 Simazine 1 108-88-3 Toluene 200**

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 1

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 10 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 200**

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 5 7440-47-3 Chromium 50 7440-50-8 Copper 50 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - penta, octa & deca

1

Chlorides - as Cl 2,000,000 Cyanides - as CN 50 Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as I-TEQ

0.0001


0.0001

Fluorides - as F 2,000 Halogenated organic compounds - as AOX

1,000

Nitrogen 50,000 Nonylphenol & nonylphenol ethoxylates

1

Organotin compounds - as SN 50 Phenols - phenol & simple substituted - as C

20

Phosphorus 5,000 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as WHO-TEQ

0.0001

Short chain (C10-C13) chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs)

1

Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 1 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 1

7 of 16


Part 4 Releases to waters * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold TBA = to be advised Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 0.1

Organics 74070-46-5 Aclonifen TBC 15792-60-8 Alachlor 0.1

309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0005 120-12-7 Anthracene 0.1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 0.05 71-43-2 Benzene 10 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 191-24-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

42576-02-3 Bifenox TBA 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride

(tetrachloromethane) 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 0.1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 0.1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 0.1


5

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 0.1 28159-98-0 Cybutryne TBA 52315-07-8 Cypermethrin 0.005


0.0005


10

62-73-7 Dichlorvos 0.0005 15307-86-5 Diclofenac TBA

115-32-2 Dicofol TBA 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0005

117-81-7 Di(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP)

0.1

330-54-1 Diuron 0.05 115-29-7 Endosuflan 0.0005

72-20-8 Endrin 0.0005 50-28-2 17-beta-estradiol (E2) TBA

8 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

57-63-6 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2)

TBA

100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 10 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride



1

206-44-0 Fluoranthene 0.1 76-44-8 Heptachlor (&

heptachlor epoxide) 0.1

36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1 25637-99-4 Hexabromocyclo-

dodecane 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 0.01 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.1


0.01

465-73-6 Isodrin 0.0005 34123-59-6 Isoproturon 0.01

58-89-9 Lindane 0.1 2385-85-5 Mirex 0.1

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 0.1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 0.05 1763-23-1 Perfluorooctane

sulphonic acid & its derivatives (PFOS)

0.1

124495-18-7

Quinoxyfen TBA

122-34-9 Simazine 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 1 886-50-0 Terbutryn TBA 108-88-3 Toluene 10

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 0.1 12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all

isomers 0.01

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 0.001

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 10

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 20 7440-50-8 Copper 20 7439-89-6 Iron 1,000 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

9 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa- and deca-BDE

0.1


0.0001


0.0001


1,000


1

Octylphenol & octylphenol ethoxylates

1


20


5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.001 Polychlorinated biphenyls as WHO-TEQ

0.0001


0.1

Total organic carbon (TOC) 50,000 Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 0.005 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 0.1

10 of 16


Part 5 Off-site transfers in waste water * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.TBA = to be advised Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 0.1

Organics 74070-46-5 Aclonifen TBA 15972-60-8 Alachlor 0.1

309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0005 120-12-7 Anthracene 0.1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 0.05 71-43-2 Benzene 10 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 191-24-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

42576-02-3 Bifenox TBA 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride

(tetrachloromethane) 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 0.1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 0.1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 0.1


5

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 0.1 28159-98-0 Cybutryne TBA 52315-07-8 Cypermethrin 0.005


0.0005


10

62-73-7 Dichlorvos TBA 15307-86-5 Diclofenac TBA

115-32-2 Dicofol TBA 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0005

117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP)

0.1

330-54-1 Diuron 0.05 115-29-7 Endosuflan 0.0005

72-20-8 Endrin 0.0005 50-28-2 17-beta-estradiol (E2) TBA

11 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

57-63-6 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2)

TBA

100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 10 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride



1

206-44-0 Fluoranthene 0.1 76-44-8 Heptachlor (&

heptachlor epoxide) 0.1

36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1 25637-99-4 Hexabromocyclo-

dodecane 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 0.01 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.1


0.01

465-73-6 Isodrin 0.0005 34123-59-6 Isoproturon 0.01

58-89-9 Lindane 0.1 2385-85-5 Mirex 0.1

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 0.1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 0.05 1763-23-1 Perfluorooctane

sulphonic acid & its derivatives (PFOS)

0.1

124495-18-7

Quinoxyfen TBA

122-34-9 Simazine 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 1 886-50-0 Terbutryn TBA 108-88-3 Toluene 10

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 0.1 12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all

isomers 0.01

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 0.001

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 10

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 20 7440-50-8 Copper 20 7439-89-6 Iron 1,000 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

12 of 16

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

C

C

C

C

C

C

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

0.00

0.27

19.98

4.45

0.54

0.54

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa- and deca-BDE

0.1


0.0001


0.0001


1,000


1

Octylphenol & octylphenol ethoxylates

1


20


5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.001 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as WHO-TEQ

0.0001


0.1

Total organic carbon (TOC) 50,000 Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 0.005 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 0.1

13 of 16


Part 6 Off-site waste transfers *see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.For the calendar year, report the total annual tonnage of hazardous or other waste transferred off-site in the appropriate table cell.

Reporting thresholds The total of all hazardous waste transfers should be reported regardless of tonnage. For other waste, an annual reporting threshold of 5 tonnes applies. If the tonnage is below this threshold, insert “brt” in the cell. Hazardous wastes are identified in the EWC by an asterisk against the code number. Liquid transfers to a wastewater treatment works should be reported as substance specific releases to wastewater.

Waste Type Tonnes Method Detailed method* Confidential Justification must be provided.

M, C or E

Hazardous waste disposed (00 00 01)

Hazardous waste recovered (00 00 02)

Other waste disposed (Non-hazardous 00 00 03)

Other waste recovered (Non-hazardous 00 00 04)

14 of 16

44.82140.71

386.44

1185.41

MM

M

M

M_WEIGHM_WEIGH

M_WEIGH

M_WEIGH


Part 7 Hazardous Waste Transfers to other countries For the calendar year

7.1 Report any transfers of hazardous waste for disposal or recovery to outside the UK. There is no reporting threshold.

Quantity tonnes

Operation disposal recovery Method weighing calculation estimation

Name of recoverer/disposer

Company address of recoverer/disposer

Country Address of actual recovery/disposal site receiving the waste transfer

Country

7.2 Give details of further transfers to other countries Quantity

tonnes Operation disposal recovery Method weighing calculation estimation

Name of recoverer/disposer

Company address of recoverer/disposer

Country

Address of actual recovery/disposal site receiving the waste transfer

Country

Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

15 of 16


Part 8 Qualification and declaration

8.1 Qualification notes

Please advise why releases and transfers have changed from previous years. Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

8.2 Declaration If you deliberately make a statement that is false or misleading, you may be liable to prosecution. I declare that as far as I know, the information on this form is true. Tick this box to confirm that you understand and agree with the declaration above.

Name Title First Name Last Name Position

Today’s date (DD/MM/YY)

8.3 What happens next Send the filled in form and any other documents to the NI Environment Agency’s office. Remember to keep a copy for your records.

16 of 16

Electricity +9%Gas +13%Oil +45%Water +40%

Haz Waste Dispose +7%Haz Waste Recovered -11%Other waste disposed (non-haz) -1%Other waste recovered (non-haz) +8%

Tonnage C02 increased 7%

Dr

Colette

Eastwood

Environmental Manager

30/01/19

Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2018 Queens Island

Documents