Annexures - Home | SSWM · 2018-02-12 · ANNEXURE 12. LIST OF WATER BODIES AND THEIR DETAILS ..... 180 ANNEXURE 13. MINUTES OF THE CTF ... Task 4.Conducting Awareness Generation

Annexures

GIZ ASEM City Sanitation Plan for Raipur

Alchemy Urban Systems (P) Ltd., 2

ANNEXURE 1. THE APPROACH & METHODOLOGY ..................................................... 149

ANNEXURE 2. LAND USE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................... 157

ANNEXURE 3. SLUM SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ........................................................... 159

ANNEXURE 4. LAND USE CODES & SPACE UTILIZATION FACTORS ............................ 163

ANNEXURE 5. ASSUMPTIONS – WATER CONSUMPTION FOR VARIOUS LAND USE CATEGORIES 165

ANNEXURE 6. ASSUMPTIONS – SOLID WASTE PER CAPITA FOR VARIOUS LAND USE CATEGORIES 167

ANNEXURE 7. WARD DETAILS ...................................................................................... 168

ANNEXURE 8. MUNICIPAL ZONES DEMARCATED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES 170

ANNEXURE 9. WARD WISE CLASSIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ............ 171

ANNEXURE 10. WARD WISE DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECTED POPULATION ................ 174

ANNEXURE 11. WARD WISE PROJECTION OF WATER DEMAND, SEWAGE GENERATION & SOLID WASTE GENERATION ........................................................................................... 177

ANNEXURE 12. LIST OF WATER BODIES AND THEIR DETAILS ..................................... 180

ANNEXURE 13. MINUTES OF THE CTF MEETING .......................................................... 184

ANNEXURE 14. POLICY PAPER – CITY SANITATION TASK FORCE ............................. 198

ANNEXURE 15. ORGANOGRAM OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ....................... 203

ANNEXURE 16. WARD SELECTION FOR PILOT AWARENESS CAMPAIGN ................... 204



ANNEXURE 1. THE APPROACH & METHODOLOGY

1.1. Key Aspects of the Approach

1.1.1. Achieving 100% sanitation

The goal of the exercise is to achieve 100% sanitation in the city. The following are the indicators

of 100% sanitation:

Primary Indicators as mandated by National Urban Sanitation Policy

Every citizen has access to a toilet & the city is „Open Defecation Free‟

All the sewage generated is collected, treated and disposed off safely

Secondary Indicators

Secondary indicators are optional and are not mandated by the NUSP. However for holistic

sanitation in a city it is important that the following indicators are also addressed. It is

recommended to include the following indicators also into the CSP.

All the solid waste generated is collected, treated and disposed off safely

All water bodies and drainages are preserved and kept clean

All the storm water drains are kept clean.

Every aspect of the process and infrastructure provision must integrate community participation

and must be inclusive. In addition water and waste water management must be carried out in an

environmentally sustainable manner, recycling andreusing the byproducts as far as possible.

1.1.2. Building local institutions and community participation

The creation of the city sanitation task force, the 100% sanitation campaign (pilots), an

integrated city sanitation plan and capacity building and training are seen as the 4 key

elements of CSP. The 4 key tasks are divided into sub-components as follows.



The CTF is the institutional structure that will hold the vision of “Total Sanitation”. With this context it

shall ensure the successful implementation of the 100% sanitation campaign as well as oversee the

plan and project formulation, implementation and operations.

1.1.3. Centralized and decentralized approaches

Most local governments prioritize centralized collection and treatment systems for managing

domestic wastewater and municipal solid waste. However, as rapid population growth in urban

areas exceeds the supply of sanitation services, it has become increasingly evident that such

conventional treatment systems are not optimal solutions to tackling wastewater and sewage in

developing countries.

The section of correct technology choice is one of the key challenges for reaching 100 % sanitation

access. Some Technologies may already exist; in that case it is the goal of the planners and

engineers to optimize existing infrastructure and reduce redundancy but maintain flexibility with

user satisfaction as the primary goal.

It is important that a holistic technical approach, which incorporates centralized and decentralized

systems are chosen. A mix of options (including conventional and non-conventional solutions) needs

to be chosen to address the sanitation issues as a whole at a city wide level. The planning

approach has to define the project-specific social, cultural, economic, health and environmental

priorities which will influence technology selection and the system design. Technologies that

promote recycle and reuse of treated wastewater should be preferred.

1.2. Methodology

The four key services have been broken down into a series of executable tasks as follows. These

tasks are not linear and many of the activities will happen in parallel and in an iterative manner.



1.2.1. The City Sanitation Task Force (CTF)

The process of formation of City Sanitation Task Force (CTF) and aspects required for institutional

functioning are described in this section.

Task 1. Stakeholder Mapping

In consultation with the municipal corporation, a wide range of stakeholders were mapped. These

stakeholders were briefed about the City Sanitation Plan and the role of CTF.

Task 2.Defining Agenda, Institutional Structure, Roles and Responsibilities for t he CTF

A policy paper on the agenda, institutional structure, roles and responsibilities is drafted and this is

shared with the municipal corporation for feedback. (referannexure no.11 for the policy paper)

Task 3.Conducting the CTF formation meeting

The stakeholders identified with the Municipal Corporation were invited for the CTF formation

meeting. The CSP consultants and GTZ Environment Cell along with the Municipal Corporation

organized the meeting.

A presentation on CTF was made to the participants. The goal for the city was set to achieve

100% sanitation. The participants were divided into groups to discuss issues with regard to

sanitation. Each group discussed the issues identified.

Task 4.Preparing the Operations Manual

An operations manual shall be prepared for the CTF to carry out its functions. This will include (not

an exhaustive list)

Detailed roles and responsibilities of the various entities involved,

Standard operating procedures for meetings, decision making, carrying out of other functions

Task 5.Preparation of Guidelines

This will include:

Guidelines forupdating city sanitation GIS & data base

Guidelines for facilitating and overseeing implementation of awareness generation programs and

meeting relevant stakeholders from time to time

Guidelines for facilitating and overseeing implementation of CSP proposals, managing bids and

selection of consultants and contractors

Guidelines for facilitating and overseeing periodic capacity building activities.

Task 6.Preparing the M & E manual

The M & E manual will contain

Procedures for evaluating CSP proposals

Procedures for periodically evaluating 100% sanitation status based on set of objective indicators

of outputs, processes and outcomes(as prescribed in Annexure III/Section 4 of the National Urban

Sanitation Policy).

Procedures for monitoring sanitation status from time to time based on similar indicators



1.2.2. The 100% Sanitation Campaign

An action plan for awareness generation and conducting one pilot awareness generation program

is suggested for 100% sanitation campaign.

Task 1. Mapping of Sanitation Issues & Target Groups

The first step would be the identification of issues related to sanitation in the city. Some of the

common issues with respect to sanitation in a city could include:

Slum dwellers have no access to clean toilets or accustomed to defecate in the open

Other citizens choose to defecate in the open in public areas as toilets are absent

People are unaware of the water cycles in a city and that poor sanitation could mean water

contamination and poor health

Sewage and solid waste often find their ways to natural drains/nallas

There are many more issues with respect to awareness on sanitation that need to be addressed

and there are different stakeholders. The solutions to these issues may require specific problem

solving interventions or changing mindsets. Both shall be addressed.

The CTF formation meeting has identified various issues and awareness generation needs.

Discussions with various stakeholders at the city level also have helped in identifying issues and

target group.

Task 2.Formulating an action plan for Awareness Generation

A short term, medium term and long term action plan for continuous awareness creation shall be

created. Different media shall be employed such as television advertisements, school competitions,

street plays and debates, etc

Existing campaigns in the country shall also be linked and utilized where possible.

Task 3.Preparation of target specific IEC material

Based on the finalization of target groups and the action plan, material for information, education

and communication shall be prepared and used. Readily available material shall be customized

and used wherever possible.

Task 4.Conducting Awareness Generation Programs

The selection of target groups and the wards shall be based on consultations with the CTF. The

attempt will be to reach out to the maximum number of citizens. The experience from this pilot shall

be used to revisit the plan for awareness generation. The communication tools for various target

groups shall be identified through consultations and tested on ground.

Task 5.Community Based Information System

A Community Based Information System shall be conceptualized into which the local partner will

capture disaggregated community level data. Specialemphasis will be given to capturing the

concerns of the poor in the city level plans. The detailed data collection that shall be carried out in

2 wards as part of the sanitation planning exercise shall be used as a reference for this purpose.



1.2.3. Capacity Building & Training

Task 1.Benchmarking of capacities

The existing human resource, infrastructure, hardware and software shall be benchmarked and

assessed for adequateness to achieve 100% sanitation.

Task 2.Training needs assessment

Knowledge areas shall be identified. Areas where in house capacities require to be built as well

as potential for private sector vendor development will be assessed.

Task 3.Formation of a Technical Core Group

A technical core group consisting of the city engineers, health officers, key officials of the

sanitation department of the Municipal Corporation and interested private sector engineering

professionals. The technical core group shall also be a part of the CTF.

Task 4.Training Workshop Series

A plan for training requirements shall be formulated based on the needs assessment. 2 or 3

thematic areas shall be selected for pilot training sessions to improve the „Plan for Training of the

Technical Core Group‟. Through the experiences of pilot training sessions this plan shall be revised.

1.2.4. City Sanitation Plan

Task 1.Preparation of Base Map

A detailed base map has been prepared on GIS platform for Raipur. The following layers and

attributes have been incorporated.

No. Data/feature Source

1 All natural and manmade features as seen including

building footprints, roads, water bodies and

drainages, etc.

Existing maps and available

satellite data

2 All administrative boundaries – Municipal

Corporation, census wards, villages, etc.

Existing maps

The following layers of information have been incorporated from the available sources

Location of slums

Existing sewerage network, pumping stations, STPs, etc

Water supply network map, both existing and proposed

Contour data from Survey of India Toposheet and Sewerage PPR

The base map will be enriched by adding attributes from the secondary sources and primary

survey.



Task 2.Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data has been collected, mapped and is used for service delivery analysis.

Demographics

Topography

Water supply – source, quantity and quality of water supplied

Sanitation – sewerage infrastructure and public toilets

Solid waste management

Data on employment in the Municipal Corporation

No. of sanctioned pots, filled and vacant posts are collected to analyse the institutional capacity.

Data on Municipal finances

Annual budgets of the last five years have been collected from the Municipal Corporation.

Master plan and development control regulations

Task 3. Field Surveys and Consultations

The field surveys and consultation are conducted to assess

Primary and secondary sources of water

Disaggregate Water demand

Access to sewerage infrastructure and toilets in slums

Disaggregate sewerage infrastructure demand

Typology of development

Note: This data can be captured through a statistical sampling methodology. However we have

devised a land use survey based methodology which works better in capturing the characteristics of

the local context and status of infrastructure provision over space. This makes project formulation

easier. This has been successfully used in many cities by the consultants.

The following shall be the methodology to capture the data:

The city is divided into blocks. These blocks have roads on all sides. The blocks are smaller in the

case of peripheral areas where there is less development and smaller in central city areas, where

development is higher.

A land use survey is conducted in each of these block and the blocks are divided into parcels

based on the land use typology. To illustrate: High end villas and MIG flats are differentiated as

the water demand and therefore sewage generation is likely to be different.

A questionnaire survey is used in each unique land use typology block to capture data on typical

size of a dwelling unit, typical size of a family, predominant water sources, secondary water

sources, quality perceptions, mode of sewage disposal, mode of solid waste disposal, etc. In

addition in slums questions are asked on individual toilets, public toilet seats, their usability,

hygiene behavior etc. Willingnes to pay for access to a sewerage system was also captured as

part of the survey.



Task 4.GIS Based Mapping System

The mapping and the database on sanitation is integrated into a GIS based system. This is used

for further analysis and decision on technology choice. A guideline shall be prepared indicating

how the database can be updated regularly and attached to other information system.

Task 5.Assessing Demand Supply Gap in a disaggregate manner

All the relevant data collected has been integrated in a GIS platform. The data generated

through the field surveys have been added as attributes to the base map (as prepared for the

whole city). Based on this data the population is distributed at the disaggregated land use

typology level. The population at the ward level is controlled using census figures. This data is then

used to disaggregate water demand, sewage generation and solid waste generation.

Raipur has sewer network covering 25% of the area. This was laid in 1992, but is not functioning

effectively because of inadequate sewerage connections. Also the sewage collected is treated

only at the primary level before discharging to the river Kharoon. Many of the households and

establishments have individual septic tanks, but the grey water overflow from these are let into

open drainage channels or open lands, which ultimately is drained to lakes and other water

bodies. Towards the outskirts of the city, open lands between developments are filled with grey

water. Dump sites can be seen all over the cityand all the open drains and nallahs are choked

with solid waste. Therefore the demand supply gap alone will not present a good picture of the

gravity of the situation. A stress analysis will then be carried out using additional indicators such as

population density, land use, availability of sewage disposal and solid waste management

systems, etc.

To illustrate a high density slum pocket with no access to toilets, sewerage or solid waste

management would present a greater sanitation problem than some other area. Similarly a

hospital with no systems would pose a greater threat than a high end residential area.

Task 6.Consultation with the CTF

After the assessment of demand supply situation and the situation analysis, a consultation shall be

organised with the CTF. The findings of assessment shall be presented.

Task 7.Assessing Technology Options

Based on the situation analysis an internal workshop will be organized to discuss possible

strategies and approaches for solving the sanitation issues. Here technology options will be

discussed and decided upon by the experts in the team. Based on this discussion, schematic designs

will be prepared. The technological options identified will be verified for their feasibility based on

the Municipal finances and availability of funds.

Task 8.Strategies and Project Formulation

Strategies and solutions shall be prepared for all the un-served areas in the city. In addition, a

strategy to address the sanitation needs of future population growth shall also be formulated

through project solutions as well as recommendations to policy and legislation.

The strategies shall focus on strengthening existing systems rather than unsustainable capital

expenditure. Special emphasis shall be given to address issues pertaining to livelihood linkages of

the urban poor with sanitation sector, user charges, etc. to develop strategies that are financially

self-sustaining.



Task 9.Draft City Sanitation Plan

Based on the situation analysis, strategy formulation and technology selection, a draft city

sanitation plan shall be prepared for Raipur. This shall include schematic designs, broad cost

estimates and an implementation strategy. The draft plan will also include recommendations to the

legislative framework and a broad assessment of training and capacity building needs.

Task 10.Consultation with CTF

The draft CSP, implementation plan and various other recommendations shall be presented to the

CTF.

Task 11.Final city sanitation plan

The relevant suggestions and recommendations received through the consultation shall be

incorporated in finalising the CSP.



ANNEXURE 2. LAND USE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

*

( / )

– – /

( )

( )

1

Guesthouse,

,

-

(occupancy rate)

[Y/ N] ,

[Y/ N] ,



/

_____ A –B –C--

( ) ( )

[ ]

-

tanker

OHT



*

*

A B C

[ ]

?

?

?

?

/

/ /

ANNEXURE 3. SLUM SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE



( ) ( )

[ ]

-tanker

OHT



-tanker

*

*

A B C

[ ]

?

?

?

?

/



/ /

.

[ / ]

What percentage of people do you think

cannot afford it?

?

How much will they be able to pay?

?



ANNEXURE 4. LAND USE CODES & SPACE UTILIZATION FACTORS

Land use subcategory Code SUF JOBS SUF RES SUF VIS

Average unit size

Jobs Residents

Visitors

Commercial Mall/Large Shops

Ca 0.025 0 0.6 200 5 0 120

Small Shops Cb 0.25 0 3.5 20 5 0 70

Market Cc 0.0833 0 1.944 180 15 0 350

Commuinty Hall/ Cinema Hall/ Marriage Hall/ Auditorium

Ce 0.0058 0 0.205 1900 11 0 390

Hotel/Guest House/Hostel Cf 0.012 0 0.015 1500 18 0 23

Dairy Cg 0.009 0 0.075 2000 18 0 150

Godowns/Warehouses Ch 0.0389 0 0.011 900 35 0 10

Big Industries Ia 0.125 0 0.05 1000 125 0 50

Small Industires Ib 0.25 0 0.5 400 100 0 200

Hospital/Clinic Na 0.12 0.1 0.5 500 60 50 250

School Nb 0.028 0 1.186 1180 33 0 1400

School + Residential Nc 0.0313 0.02667 1.8 1500 47 40 2700

College Nd 0.0892 0 1.675 1200 107 0 2010

College + Residential Ne 0.1375 0.01 0.417 1200 165 12 500

Offices Nf 0.121 0 0.435 1000 121 0 435

Religious Ng 0.1133 0 1.367 150 17 0 205

Army/Defence Ni 0.0083 0 0 2400 20 0 0



HIG Residential Ra 0.0029 0.01143 0.0006 350 1 4 0.2

HIG Apartment Rb - 0.02 0.001 200 0 4 0.2

Residential + Commercial Rc - 0.0375 0.3333 120 0 4.5 40

Row Houses Rd - 0.0375 0.0017 120 0 4.5 0.2

MIG Residential Re - 0.05 0 100 0 5 0

LIG Residential Rf - 0.09167 0 60 0 5.5 0

Slum Rg - 0.325 0 20 0 6.5 0

Ashram/Hostel Rh 0.0044 0.03333 0.2778 1800 8 60 500

MIG Apartment Rj - 0.0375 0 120 0 4.5 0

LIG Apartment Rk - 0.08333 0 60 0 5 0

Services Sa 0.04 0 0 100 4 0 0

Sulabh Complex Sc 0.025 0 5 40 1 0 200

Bus Stop Ta 0.02 0 4 50 1 0 200

Logistic Tc 0.025 0 0.115 200 5 0 23

Taxi Stand/Parking Td 20 0 0 1

Village V - 0.09833 0.0033 60 5.9 0.2



ANNEXURE 5. ASSUMPTIONS – WATER CONSUMPTION FOR VARIOUS LAND USE CATEGORIES

Land use subcategory Code Jobs Residents Visitors

Commercial Mall/Large Shops Ca 20 0 5

Small Shops Cb 10 0 2

Market Cc 20 0 2

Community Hall/Cinema Hall/Marriage Hall/Auditorium Ce 20 0 12

Hotel/Guest House/Hostel Cf 20 0 80

Dairy Cg 20 0 2

Godowns/Warehouses Ch 20 0 2

Big Industries Ia

Small Industires Ib

Hospital/Clinic Na 70 70 70

School Nb 20 0 20

School + Residential Nc 20 70 30

College Nd 20 0 30

College + Residential Ne 20 70 30

Offices Nf 20 0 5

Religious Ng 20 0 2

Army/Defence Ni

HIG Residential Ra 0 180 0

HIG Apartment Rb 150 0

Residential + Commercial Rc 130 0

Row Houses Rd 130 0

MIG Residential Re 130 0

LIG Residential Rf 70 0

Slum Rg 50 0

Ashram/Hostel Rh 20 110 5

MIG Apartment Rj 110 0

LIG Apartment Rk 70 0

Services Sa

Sulabh Complex Sc 15



Logistic Tc 20 2

Village V 0 70 0



ANNEXURE 6. ASSUMPTIONS – SOLID WASTE PER CAPITA FOR VARIOUS LAND USE CATEGORIES

Land use subcategory Code Jobs Residents Visitors

Commercial Mall/Large Shops Ca 340 120

Small Shops Cb 340 10

Market Cc 200 0

Commuinty Hall/Cinema Hall/Marriage Hall/Auditorium Ce 100 90

Hotel/Guest House/Hostel Cf 100 150

Dairy Cg 90

Godowns/Warehouses Ch 100

Big Industries Ia

Small Industires Ib

Hospital/Clinic Na 150 150 100

School Nb 120 90

School + Residential Nc 120 150

College Nd 120 90

College + Residential Ne 120 150

Offices Nf 120

Religious Ng 120

Army/Defence Ni

HIG Residential Ra 400

HIG Apartment Rb 400

Residential + Commercial Rc 340

Row Houses Rd 340

MIG Residential Re 340

LIG Residential Rf 150

Slum Rg 100

Ashram/Hostel Rh 100 100 90

MIG Apartment Rj 340

LIG Apartment Rk 150

Bus stop Ta 90 90

Logistic Tc 90 90

Village V 100



ANNEXURE 7. WARD DETAILS

WARD NO. NAME

1 Veer Savarkar Nagar Ward

2 Ram Krishna Param Hansh Ward

3 Sant Kabir Das Ward

4 Yatiyatan Lal Ward

5 Banjari Mata Mandir Ward

6 Virangana Avanti Bai Ward

7 Veer Shivajee Ward

8 Netajee Kanahaiya Lal Bajari Ward

9 Thakkar Bapa Ward

10 Baal Ganga Dhar Tilak Ward

11 Daanvir Bhama Shah Ward

12 Shaheed Manmohan Singh Bakshi Ward

13 Shaheed Bhagat Singh Ward

14 Ishwari Charan Shukla Ward

15 Swami Atma Nand Ward

16 Shaheed Chuda Mani Nayak Ward

17 Ram Sagar Para Ward

18 Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel Ward

19 Sant Ramdas Ward

20 Indiragandhi Ward

21 Raman Mandir Ward

22 Rajeev Gandhi Ward

23 Rani Laxmi Bai Ward

24 Ravi Shankar Shukla Ward

25 Mahatma Gandhi Ward

26 Kusha Bhau Thakare Ward

27 Bhim Rao Ambedkar Ward

28 Maharshi Balmiki Ward

29 Netajee Subhash Chandra Bose Ward

30 Kali Mata Ward

31 Shankar Nagar Ward

32 Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh Ward

33 Lal Bahadur Shashtri Ward

34 Guru Govind Singh Ward

35 Shaheed Hemu Kalani Ward

36 Hawaldar Abdul Hameed Ward

37 Jawahar Lal Neharu Ward

38 Tatya Para Ward



39 Sadar Bazar Ward

40 Babu Jag Jeevan Ram Ward

41 Maulana Abdul Rauf Ward

42 Civil Line Ward

43 Mother Teresa Ward

44 Guru Ghasi Das Ward

45 Rani Durga Vati Ward

46 Rajendra Prasad Ward

47 Arvind Dixit Ward

48 Bhagvati Charan Shukla Ward

49 Moti Lal Neharu Ward

50 Shaheed Pankaj Vikram Ward

51 Ravindra Nath Tagore Ward

52 Chandra Shekhar Azaad Ward

53 Mureshwar Rao Gadre Ward

54 Shaheed Rajeev Pandey Ward

55 Shaheed Brigradiar Usmaan Ward

56 Vipin Bihari Soor Ward

57 Swami Vivakanand Ward

58 Brahaman Para Ward

59 Kankali Para Ward

60 Thakur Pyarelal Ward

61 Mahant Laxmi Narayan Das Ward

62 Mahamaya Mandir Ward

63 Shyama Prasad Mukharjee Ward

64 Vaman Rao Lakhe Ward

65 Kamred Sudhir Mukharjee Ward

66 Sundarlal Sharma Ward

67 Khoob Chand Baghel Ward

68 Madhav Rao Sapre Ward

69 Pt.dindayal Upadhayay Ward

70 Sant Ravi Das Ward



ANNEXURE 8. MUNICIPAL ZONES DEMARCATED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES

Zone Number Address Total Number of

Wards in the Zone Ward Number

Zone 1 Machhi Talab, Gudiyari, Raipur 10 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 19

Zone 2 Shahid Smarak School, Fafadih Chowk, Raipur 8

6, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27

Zone 3 Shankar Nagar, below water tank, Raipur 8

24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 42

Zone 4 Beside Veterinary hospital, Gandhi Chowk, Raipur 10

32, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

Zone 5 Sakharam Dubey School, Vivekanand Aashram, Raipur 8

59, 60, 61, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69

Zone 6 Near Filter Plant, Bhatagaon, Raipur 10

39, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 62, 63

Zone 7 Nayapara School, Ganj Dabri, Tatyapara, Raipur 8

16, 17, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 58

Zone 8 Mahoba Bazar, Housing Board Colony, Raipur 8 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 68, 70

Source : Website of RMC (2010)



ANNEXURE 9. WARD WISE CLASSIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL

Ward Dev Potential 2011-2021 Dev Potential 2021-2031 Dev Potential 2031-2041

1 High High High

2 High High Medium

3 Medium High High

4 Medium High High

5 High Low Low

6 High Medium Medium

7 Medium Low Low

8 V High High Medium


10 Medium Medium Low

11 High High Medium

12 High High Medium


14 High High Medium

15 Medium Low Low

16 Low Low Low

17 Low Low Low

18 High Medium Low

19 Low Low Low

20 Low Low Low

21 Low Low Low

22 Medium Low Low

23 Medium Low Low

24 Low Low Low

25 Low Low Low

26 High V High V High



29 V High Medium High

30 High Medium Low



31 High Medium Low

32 Medium Low Low

33 Low Low Low

34 Low Low Low

35 Low Low Low

36 Low Low Low

37 Low Low Low

38 Low Low Low

39 Low Low Low

40 Low Low Low

41 Low Low Low

42 Low Low Low

43 Low Low Low

44 Medium Low Low

45 V High High High

46 V High V High V High


48 Low Low Low

49 Medium Low Low

50 Medium High High

51 V High V High V High


53 Medium Medium High


55 Low Low Low

56 Low Low Low

57 Low Low Low

58 Low Low Low

59 Low Low Low

60 Low Low Low

61 Low Low Low


63 Medium V High V High




65 High Medium Low

66 High Medium Low

67 V High V High Low



70 Low High High



ANNEXURE 10. WARD WISE DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECTED POPULATION

Year Population (In Lakhs) Decadal Growth rate

1971 2.06 64.08

1981 3.38 36.09

1991 4.60 65.0

2001 7.59 50.99

2011 11.46 63.17

2021 18.70 57.0

2031 29.36 39.71

2041 41.02 0.0

Ward Pop_2001 Pop_2011

from landuse

survey

Proj_Pop_2021 Proj_Pop_2031 Proj_Pop_2041

1 11984 20706 37271 66624 112886

2 12352 23882 42987 76841 99295

3 12356 21307 34943 68555 116160

4 12285 20257 33221 65177 110435

5 11365 21121 38017 36661 46832

6 9849 17474 31453 46712 72653

7 11765 21441 35163 37217 47542

8 12154 18915 37073 60859 78643

9 11355 20098 39392 64665 83561

10 12127 16916 27743 45221 37509

11 10410 14554 26197 46828 60512

12 11382 20528 36950 66049 85350

13 11231 18202 35676 58565 75679

14 9848 17588 31659 56590 73127

15 11347 16245 26643 28199 36022

16 10513 18506 24427 32122 41033

17 9665 11753 15514 20401 26061

18 11910 17211 30979 46008 38162

19 11600 15962 21070 27708 35394



20 12104 15490 20447 26888 34347

21 9495 16195 21378 28112 35911

22 10051 19495 31973 33840 43228

23 10280 20532 33672 35639 45526

24 10051 11949 15773 20742 26496

25 10347 12770 16857 22167 28317

26 11968 14935 26883 56936 104392

27 10600 21029 37852 80168 146989

28 12430 22638 40748 86301 158234

29 10413 17670 34633 47236 96333

30 9267 18487 33276 49419 40991

31 10258 12681 22825 33898 28117

32 10731 17467 28646 30320 38731

33 9902 16534 21824 28699 36661

34 10364 13302 17559 23090 29495

35 10681 13463 17771 23369 29852

36 10802 12410 16381 21542 27518

37 10945 13066 17247 22680 28972

38 12032 14188 18728 24627 31459

39 9261 11065 14606 19207 24535

40 9466 10612 14008 18421 23531

41 9430 12044 15899 20907 26707

42 12078 15039 19852 26105 33347

43 12247 18050 23826 31331 40022

44 11987 17760 29126 30828 39380

45 10958 15704 30781 50530 85617

46 10126 21447 42035 81760 149907

47 10594 12252 20093 32752 27166

48 12000 13681 18058 23747 30335

49 11218 18026 29562 31289 39969

50 9468 12431 20386 39996 67769

51 10387 19318 37863 73645 135029

52 11107 13050 23489 49749 91215

53 12050 24055 39449 64303 131140



54 9710 13471 22092 36010 29869

55 11562 15385 20308 26706 34114

56 10259 12993 17151 22553 28810

57 9433 11327 14951 19661 25115

58 9632 12414 16387 21549 27527

59 9551 11211 14799 19460 24859

60 9931 12425 16402 21568 27551

61 10366 13162 17374 22847 29185

62 10806 17398 34101 55980 72338

63 12251 21541 35327 82120 150567

64 11417 14184 23262 37918 31452

65 9565 12001 21602 32082 26611

66 9934 15047 27084 40223 33364

67 11497 22385 43876 85339 49636

68 9678 18258 32865 69605 127621

69 10400 17935 35153 57707 74570

70 12303 13745 18144 44226 74936



ANNEXURE 11. WARD WISE PROJECTION OF WATER DEMAND, SEWAGE GENERATION & SOLID WASTE GENERATION

Item Unit Assumptions

Water Demand MLD 135 LPCD*

Sewage generation MLD @ 80% of water demand

Solid waste generation Metric Tons 450 gm. Per person

Note - * - Without unaccounted for water

Ward

No.

2021 2031 2041

Water

demand

Sew

gen

SW

gen

Water

demand

Sew

gen

SW gen Water

demand

Sew

gen

SW

gen

1 5.0 4.0 16.8 9.0 7.2 30.0 15.2 12.2 50.8

2 5.8 4.6 19.3 10.4 8.3 34.6 13.4 10.7 44.7

3 4.7 3.8 15.7 9.3 7.4 30.8 15.7 12.5 52.3

4 4.5 3.6 14.9 8.8 7.0 29.3 14.9 11.9 49.7

5 5.1 4.1 17.1 4.9 4.0 16.5 6.3 5.1 21.1

6 4.2 3.4 14.2 6.3 5.0 21.0 9.8 7.8 32.7

7 4.7 3.8 15.8 5.0 4.0 16.7 6.4 5.1 21.4

8 5.0 4.0 16.7 8.2 6.6 27.4 10.6 8.5 35.4

9 5.3 4.3 17.7 8.7 7.0 29.1 11.3 9.0 37.6

10 3.7 3.0 12.5 6.1 4.9 20.3 5.1 4.1 16.9

11 3.5 2.8 11.8 6.3 5.1 21.1 8.2 6.5 27.2

12 5.0 4.0 16.6 8.9 7.1 29.7 11.5 9.2 38.4

13 4.8 3.9 16.1 7.9 6.3 26.4 10.2 8.2 34.1

14 4.3 3.4 14.2 7.6 6.1 25.5 9.9 7.9 32.9

15 3.6 2.9 12.0 3.8 3.0 12.7 4.9 3.9 16.2

16 3.3 2.6 11.0 4.3 3.5 14.5 5.5 4.4 18.5

17 2.1 1.7 7.0 2.8 2.2 9.2 3.5 2.8 11.7

18 4.2 3.3 13.9 6.2 5.0 20.7 5.2 4.1 17.2

19 2.8 2.3 9.5 3.7 3.0 12.5 4.8 3.8 15.9

20 2.8 2.2 9.2 3.6 2.9 12.1 4.6 3.7 15.5

21 2.9 2.3 9.6 3.8 3.0 12.7 4.8 3.9 16.2

22 4.3 3.5 14.4 4.6 3.7 15.2 5.8 4.7 19.5

23 4.5 3.6 15.2 4.8 3.8 16.0 6.1 4.9 20.5



24 2.1 1.7 7.1 2.8 2.2 9.3 3.6 2.9 11.9

25 2.3 1.8 7.6 3.0 2.4 10.0 3.8 3.1 12.7

26 3.6 2.9 12.1 7.7 6.1 25.6 14.1 11.3 47.0

27 5.1 4.1 17.0 10.8 8.7 36.1 19.8 15.9 66.1

28 5.5 4.4 18.3 11.7 9.3 38.8 21.4 17.1 71.2

29 4.7 3.7 15.6 6.4 5.1 21.3 13.0 10.4 43.4

30 4.5 3.6 15.0 6.7 5.3 22.2 5.5 4.4 18.4

31 3.1 2.5 10.3 4.6 3.7 15.3 3.8 3.0 12.7

32 3.9 3.1 12.9 4.1 3.3 13.6 5.2 4.2 17.4

33 2.9 2.4 9.8 3.9 3.1 12.9 4.9 4.0 16.5

34 2.4 1.9 7.9 3.1 2.5 10.4 4.0 3.2 13.3

35 2.4 1.9 8.0 3.2 2.5 10.5 4.0 3.2 13.4

36 2.2 1.8 7.4 2.9 2.3 9.7 3.7 3.0 12.4

37 2.3 1.9 7.8 3.1 2.4 10.2 3.9 3.1 13.0

38 2.5 2.0 8.4 3.3 2.7 11.1 4.2 3.4 14.2

39 2.0 1.6 6.6 2.6 2.1 8.6 3.3 2.6 11.0

40 1.9 1.5 6.3 2.5 2.0 8.3 3.2 2.5 10.6

41 2.1 1.7 7.2 2.8 2.3 9.4 3.6 2.9 12.0

42 2.7 2.1 8.9 3.5 2.8 11.7 4.5 3.6 15.0

43 3.2 2.6 10.7 4.2 3.4 14.1 5.4 4.3 18.0

44 3.9 3.1 13.1 4.2 3.3 13.9 5.3 4.3 17.7

45 4.2 3.3 13.9 6.8 5.5 22.7 11.6 9.2 38.5

46 5.7 4.5 18.9 11.0 8.8 36.8 20.2 16.2 67.5

47 2.7 2.2 9.0 4.4 3.5 14.7 3.7 2.9 12.2

48 2.4 2.0 8.1 3.2 2.6 10.7 4.1 3.3 13.7

49 4.0 3.2 13.3 4.2 3.4 14.1 5.4 4.3 18.0

50 2.8 2.2 9.2 5.4 4.3 18.0 9.1 7.3 30.5

51 5.1 4.1 17.0 9.9 8.0 33.1 18.2 14.6 60.8

52 3.2 2.5 10.6 6.7 5.4 22.4 12.3 9.9 41.0

53 5.3 4.3 17.8 8.7 6.9 28.9 17.7 14.2 59.0

54 3.0 2.4 9.9 4.9 3.9 16.2 4.0 3.2 13.4

55 2.7 2.2 9.1 3.6 2.9 12.0 4.6 3.7 15.4

56 2.3 1.9 7.7 3.0 2.4 10.1 3.9 3.1 13.0

57 2.0 1.6 6.7 2.7 2.1 8.8 3.4 2.7 11.3



58 2.2 1.8 7.4 2.9 2.3 9.7 3.7 3.0 12.4

59 2.0 1.6 6.7 2.6 2.1 8.8 3.4 2.7 11.2

60 2.2 1.8 7.4 2.9 2.3 9.7 3.7 3.0 12.4

61 2.3 1.9 7.8 3.1 2.5 10.3 3.9 3.2 13.1

62 4.6 3.7 15.3 7.6 6.0 25.2 9.8 7.8 32.6

63 4.8 3.8 15.9 11.1 8.9 37.0 20.3 16.3 67.8

64 3.1 2.5 10.5 5.1 4.1 17.1 4.2 3.4 14.2

65 2.9 2.3 9.7 4.3 3.5 14.4 3.6 2.9 12.0

66 3.7 2.9 12.2 5.4 4.3 18.1 4.5 3.6 15.0

67 5.9 4.7 19.7 11.5 9.2 38.4 6.7 5.4 22.3

68 4.4 3.5 14.8 9.4 7.5 31.3 17.2 13.8 57.4

69 4.7 3.8 15.8 7.8 6.2 26.0 10.1 8.1 33.6

70 2.4 2.0 8.2 6.0 4.8 19.9 10.1 8.1 33.7



ANNEXURE 12. LIST OF WATER BODIES AND THEIR DETAILS

LAKE_NO NAME OF THE WATERBODY VILLAGE AREA in HA

W01L01 Nakti Talab Hirapur 3.79

W01L02 Jharnaha Talab Hirapur 0.70

W01L03 Tengna Talab Hirapur 0.84

W01L04 Bada Talab Jarvai 0.61

W01L05 Dabri Jarvai 1.07

W01L06 Bandhawa Talab Jarvai 1.71

W01L07 Cherka Talab Atari 0.76

W01L08 Naya Talab Atari 0.31

W02L01 Jagrain Talab-Ashok Nagar Gudiyari 0.10

W02L02 Tintaria Gogaon 1.09

W02L03 Darri Talab Gogaon 0.20

W02L04 Dabri Gogaon 0.53

W02L05 Daba Talab Kota 1.43

W02L06 Gaon Dabari Talab Kota 0.44

W02L07 Nistaari / Naya Talab Kota 1.94

W02L09 Bhawnia Talab Hirapur 2.21

W03L01 Bandhwa Talab Gogaon 3.13

W03L02 Bichdi Talab Gogaon 0.08

W03L03 Chitwan Talab Gogaon 1.42

W04L01 Naya Talab Gondwara 0.80

W04L01 Bandhwa Talab-1 Bhanpuri 3.83

W04L02 Dabri Gondwara 0.33

W04L02 Darri Talab Bhanpuri 1.01

W04L03 Bada Talab Gondwara 1.78

W04L03 Chhantwa Talab Bhanpuri 1.70

W04L04 Chhota Talab Gondwara 0.89

W05L01 Bandhwa talab-2 Bhanpuri 1.21

W05L02 Sendhwar Bhanpuri 0.86

W07L01 Pankhatia Talab Khamtarai 1.41

W07L02 Chhotwa Talab Khamtarai 1.78

W07L03 Nistari Talab Khamtarai 0.45

W07L04 Dongia Talab Khamtarai 1.53

W08L01 Machchi Talab Gudiyari 0.59

W08L01 Naya Talab Gudiyari 1.53

W11L01 Kukri Talab Gudiyari 1.06

W12L01 Krishna Nagar - Gaddha Talab - Darri Kota 2.14

W12L02 Mahant Talab Kota 1.91

W12L03 Pathu Talab Kota 0.84

W13L01 Tatibabh Talab Tatibandh 1.38

W13L02 Ayappa Talab Tatibandh 0.64

W13L03 Tatibandh - 3 Tatibandh 0.52

W13L05 Chuiha Talab Hirapur 1.94



W13L06 Dabri Hirapur 0.44

W14L01 Dumar Talab Dumartalab 1.70

W14L02 Niji Talab/Bada Talab Dumartalab 2.23

W15L01 Jora Talab-Jorapara Raipur Khas 0.00

W15L02 Karbala Pond Raipur Khas 3.04

W16L01 Kari Talab Raipur Khas 0.46

W16L02 Dhobin Talab Raipur Khas 1.63

W16L03 Amma Pond Raipur Khas 3.13

W16L04 Ghorahi Talab Raipur Khas 2.43

W16L05 Ramakund Pond Raipur Khas 0.48

W17L01 Ram Sagri Talab-Ransagarpara Raipur Khas 0.00

W22L01 Nistari - Sahupara Talab Fafadih 1.07

W24L01 Raja Talab Pandri 5.38

W25L02 Pandari Tahari Talab Pandri 1.39

W26L01 Hagariya Talab Daldal Seoni 0.48

W26L02 Bandhwa Talab Daldal Seoni 2.86

W26L03 Bade talab-Shitla Talab Daldal Seoni 5.36

W26L04 Hadha Talab Daldal Seoni 0.43

W26L05 Bhatin Dabari Talab Daldal Seoni 0.26

W26L06 Naya Talab Daldal Seoni 0.51

W26L07 Nao Dabri Daldal Seoni 0.17

W26L08 Bade Talab Saddu 1.67

W26L09 Chhao Talab Saddu 0.57

W26L10 Chota Talab Saddu 0.79

W26L11 Dabri Saddu 0.30

W26L12 Madhiya Talab Mova 1.26

W28L01 Nistari Talab Labhandi 0.76

W28L02 Chhote Talab Labhandi 0.39

W28L03 Bade Talab Labhandi 0.31

W28L04 Dabri-1 Labhandi 1.14

W28L05 Dabri-2 Labhandi 0.31

W28L06 Shiv Mandir Talab/Chotte Talab Telibandha 0.39

W28L07 Bade Dabri - Avanti Vihar Telibandha 1.05

W29L01 Bandhwa Talab - Purana Talab Kamridih 2.01

W29L02 Dabri Khamridih 0.51

W29L03 Naya Talab Khamridih 0.79

W30L01 Dodhgi Talab Pandri 0.34

W36L01 Rajbandha Talab Raipur Khas 0.20

W38L02 Handi Talab (Old) Raipur Khas 5.85

W42L01 Katora Talab Telibandha 1.08

W43L01 Telibandha Telibandha 10.31

W45L01 Laxchi Talab Purena 1.89

W45L02 Dabri Purena 0.83

W46L01 Dabri Amlidih 0.68

W46L02 Amali Talab Amlidih 1.40



W46L03 Ama Dabri Amlidih 0.52

W47L01 Satbahania Talab Telibandha 0.30

W49L02 Naraiya Talab-1 Tikrapara 4.58

W49L03 Naraiya Talab-2 Tikrapara 1.27

W49L04 Chhiuya Talab Tikrapara 0.43

W51L01 Pachpedi Talab Tikrapara 0.71

W51L02 Lalpur Talab - Purana Lalpur 1.06

W51L03 Naya Lalpur Talab Lalpur 0.31

W51L04 Naya Talab Lalpur 0.63

W52L01 Halka Talab Mathpurena 1.55

W52L02 Nawa Talab/Shitla Talab Mathpurena 0.49

W52L03 Dabri Mathpurena 1.94

W52L04 Bandhawa Mathpurena 2.22

W52L05 Dongia Mathpurena 0.83

W54L01 Sarjubandha Mathpara 15.77

W56L01 Chironji Talab Mathpara 1.33

W56L02 Chironji Talab-2 Mathpara 0.69

W56L03 Dabri(Near Ramakrishna Nursery) Tikrapara 1.29

W56L04 Gabrapara Dabri Tikrapara 0.27

W57L01 Budha Talab Raipur Khas 27.19

W58L01 Kankali Talab Raipur Khas 0.78

W60L01 Turki Talab Raipur Khas 0.26

W60L02 Danganiya Talab Dangania 0.94

W62L01 Bahiya Talab-Kukripara Bhatagaon 2.29

W62L02 Chowkhadia Talab Raipur Khas 1.26

W63L01 Anchi Talab Bhatagaon 5.19

W63L02 Naya Talab Bhatagaon 0.48

W63L03 Bhalaya Bhatagaon 0.86

W63L04 Darri Talab Bhatagaon 0.89

W64L01 Gopia Dabri Raipur Khas 0.63

W64L02 Khadan Talab Bhimnagar Raipur Khas 0.39

W65L01 Khadan talab Gandhi Nagar Raipur Khas 0.13

W65L02 Khadan Talab Krishna nagar Raipur Khas 1.32

W65L03 Khokho Talab Raipur Khas 4.82

W65L04 Bandhwa Talab Raipur Khas 2.57

W65L05 Pahaldua Talab Raipur Khas 1.63

W66L01 Pahari Talab Tikrapara 1.93

W66L02 Amar Puri Talab Raipur Khas 0.74

W67L01 Changorbhata Talab Changorbhata 1.39

W67L02 Naya Talab Changorbhata 0.87

W68L01 Bade Jora Raipura 1.33

W68L02 Chotte Jora Raipura 0.56

W68L03 Gadahi Talab Raipura 1.17

W68L04 Pankhatia Raipura 1.09

W68L05 Duska Talab Raipura 0.47



W68L06 Kalarin Raipura 0.64

W68L07 Hagaria Raipura 0.66

W68L08 Limali Raipura 1.19

W68L09 Bandhawa Raipura 2.09

W68L10 Kota Dabri Raipura 0.74

W68L11 Chhota Kot Dabri Raipur 0.88

W68L12 Baba Kuti Dabri Raipur 0.44

W69L01 Bada Talab Dangania 2.08

W70L01 Naya Talab Sarona 3.09

Source : PPR for Sewerage, Drainage and Lake Protection Works



ANNEXURE 13. MINUTES OF THE CTF MEETING

Introduction

The National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP) formulated by the Ministry of Urban development

(MoUD) aims at integrating a city wide approach to sanitation, to reach the poor and the unserved.

The NUSP outlines the vision of urban sanitation as:

“All Indian cities and towns become totally sanitized, healthy and livable and ensure and sustain good

public health and environmental outcomes for all their citizens with a special focus on hygienic and

affordable sanitation facilities for the urban poor and women”

Raipur has scored 274 and falls in the red category in the recent National Urban Sanitation Rating

released by the Ministry of urban Development. Under the NUSP, city of Raipur has to prepare the

City sanitation Plan (CSP). In order to make planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of city

wide sanitation more participatory and representative, NUSP has suggested creation of City Task

Force (CTF). Also capacity building and awareness campaign are recognized as integral part to

achieve 100% sanitation.

GTZ-ASEM is supporting the preparation of City Sanitation Plan for Raipur. The consortium formed by

CDD Society, Alchemy Urban Systems and CEPT University is preparing the CSP for Raipur. The

Leading partner for Raipur, Alchemy, has undertaken background studies about the city. The

stakeholders to be part of the CTF were identified with the help of the Municipal Corporation. A three

hour session was organized with the participation of various stakeholders to form the City Task Force

(CTF). In this meeting the stakeholders also identified issues with regard to sanitation.

Roll out of the program

The meeting deviated from the original agenda and sequence. The program started with a round of

self-introductions by all the participants. The original agenda is annexed to this report (refer Table

10.1).

Outline of the meeting is as follows:

Introduction Sri. AlokChandravanshi, Deputy

Commissioner, Raipur Nagar Nigam

Introduction to GTZ‟s technical involvement in Raipur Dr. Pratibha Singh, GTZ Consultant,

Environmental Cell, Raipur Nagar Nigam

Brief introduction and welcome of participants Dr. Dirk Walther, Senior Technical Advisor,

Indo-German Environment Programme-ASEM,

Sustainable Urban Development , GTZ

Introduction to City Sanitation Plan and City Task

Force

Sri. B.R. Balachandran, Team leader

Power point presentation on City Sanitation Plan and Sri. AlokChandravanshi, Deputy Commissioner



City Task Force

Address

Sri. Sanjay Srivastav, Standing Committee

Chairman, Raipur Nagar Nigam

Address

Smt. Kiran MayeeNayak, Mayor, Raipur

Nagar Nigam

Group formation and discussion

Moderated by Sri. AlokChandravanshi,

Deputy Commissioner, Raipur Nagar

Nigamand Sri. B.R. Balachandran, Team

leader

Address

Dr. A. Boaz, Additional Conservator of Forest

Closing remarks

Sri. B.R. Balachandran, Team leader

Vote of thanks Dr. AmritChopra, Health Officer, Raipur

Nagar Nigam

Introduction to City Sanitation Plan for Raipur

Sri. AlokChandravanshi

Deputy Commissioner

Raipur Municipal Corporation

Introduction to City sanitation Plan

Introduction to the technical team and their assistance

Dr. Pratibha Singh

GTZ Consultant, Environmental Cell


Involvement of GTZ in Raipur with the State Government and the Raipur Nagar Nigam

Purpose of the present meeting as per National Urban Sanitation Policy

Expectations from the City Task force

Dr. Dirk Walther

Senior Technical Advisor

Indo-German Environment Programme-ASEM

Brief introduction



Welcome to participants

Presentation on the City Sanitation Plan and City

Task Force

Mr. B.R. Balachandran

Team Leader, City Sanitation Plan Team

Alchemy Urban Systems Pvt. Ltd.

Bangalore

As there was no power supply Mr. B.R. Balachandran, the team leader for the City Sanitation Plan for

Raipur presented orally the intentions of City Sanitation Plan and the City Task Force.

For the content refer next section and the attached presentation in Annexure3

Sri. AlokChandravanshi

Deputy Commissioner


Subsequent to Mr. Balachandran‟s presentation, the power supply was restored and the PowerPoint

presentation was run by Sri. AlokChandravanshi.

The presentation dealt with the following aspects:

Background

National Urban Sanitation Policy

Need for City Task Force

Preparation of City Sanitation Plan

Methodology

Raipur‟s position in the national level ranking

Issues with respect to sanitation in Raipur

Efforts of Municipal Corporation to improve the sanitation scenario

Vision for the city

Need for citizens participation

City Sanitation Task Force (CTF)



Participation in CTF

Stages of involvement

Operational aspects

Address

Sr. Sanjay Srivastav

Chairman, Standing Committee


Proper planning is required to change the sanitation situation in Raipur.

The planning process should not be done hastily and should be deliberated adequately.

Awareness generation amongst the public could be a major hurdle in the planning process. He stressed

on the need of awareness campaign.

The technical capacity of the Municipal Corporation is limited and it needs to take help from outside.

Smt. Kiran MayeeNayak

Mayor


Implementation of sanitation proposals was always a question.

Usually sanitation is seen as the job of Municipal Corporation. It is required that everybody should

work towards making Raipur a better city in terms of sanitation.

The City Task Force should take awareness as a major thrust area. CTF should also include the urban

poor.

Gender participation in the CTF is also important.

The field surveys should cover all neighborhoods involving people.

There is a need for finding land for public toilets.

To achieve 100 % sanitation, the city should keep a deadline of 2-3 years and also should strive

towards improving the ranking of the city every year by 50-60 positions up.

Group Formation and Discussion

The presentation on the sanitation scenario and the role of CTF was followed by the group formation



to discuss issues pertaining to sanitation in Raipur. The issues were broadly classified in to different

headings including

Awareness and behavior

Institutional and financial capacity

Infrastructure and

Others

8 groups were formed with 4 – 5 members in each group. Each group was distributed with cards of

different colours to write down the issues with respect to each of the above indicated. The groups held

an internal discussion for 20 minutes after which each group has presented their observations on all the

matters concerning to sanitation.

Infrastructure

Solid waste:

Raipur lack proper system for collection & disposal of solid waste from all the sources

Need for door to door garbage collection and the collection and removal of garbage has to be

ensured.

Need for proper disposal technology and also segregation is required

Garbage should never be disposed in the open. The garbage should be placed in closed bags and

handed over to the garbage collectors

There should be penalty for the people who keep garbage in front of the houses

Need for garbage bins in public places and it should be collected timely

The garbage points should be identified and monitored on the daily basis

Garbage collecting bins should be mandatory near shops and hotels

Adequate and proper garbage carrying vehicles are required. Need for proper mechanism for the

transfer of solid waste (hand crafts, mini tractors or trucks)

Proper disposal of glass, plastic, paper, after completion of social gatherings, marriages and meetings

has to be ensured

Provision for disposal of e- waste, thermocol and plastic is required

The waste should be managed at decentralized level. The garbage should be processed locally and

income can be generated from that.

It is important to obtain site clearance for landfill sites. Solid waste should not be dumped anywhere as

is being practiced today. There are high chances of ground water getting contaminated.

Complaints and problems should be sorted out ward wise.

Sewerage:

There is no sewer network in the city and the entire effluent flows in the open drains

The existing STP is not functional. Proper repairs and maintenance should be done for the existing

treatment plant.

There is a need for proper drainage and sewerage System.



Laying of sewer lines in already developed areas are a big problem. Alternative approaches should

be looked at to address the sanitation scenario of developed areas. New technology should be

adopted in already developed areas to treat sewage.

The sewage/effluent flowing to the drain/nallas should be treated first and then discharged in to the

water bodies.

Ponds/tanks are very important and only storm water should be drained into that.

The sewage should be recycled and the treated water should be used for gardens, cleaning, industries

and firefighting.

The drains are not built properly and people should be involved in the making of it. Otherwise they

think that it belongs to RMC.

Drain/nallah should be properly designed to carry the liquid waste.

Complaints and problems occurred in any ward should be taken in action as early as possible and has

to satisfy the complainer by solving the problem.

Encroachment upon the sewage drains must be banned so that the flow of sewage is not restricted

Public toilets and Individual toilets:

Open defecation is a major issue.

Availability/Affordability of latrine facility should be made possible for each and every family of the

city, particularly in slums.

Lack of public toilets at important public places is a major concern.

Public toilets are there, but they are located far from the users.

Construct private and community toilets.

In the slums, start with public toilets. To promote individual toilets, they should be subsidized wherever

possible.

Construction of public toilets can be outsourced

Temporary toilets have to be provided for the floating population

Pollution of waterbodies:

Improvement & beautification of existing tanks are needed.

Remove encroachments to protect water bodies and environment.

Liquid waste mixed the solid waste flow into the nalla.

All the open drains flow into the nallas which reaches the talab polluting the water bodies.

Others:

Lack of technical knowhow.

Lack of correct data

Lack of regular monitor.

Lack of accurate road map

Magnitude of the problem

Road map for filling the gaps



Providing the adequate finance.

Monitoring the quality of work.

Institutional& Financial Capacities

Planning

Lack of Phase wise planning & constructing.

Funding

Lack of funds for development activities.

Funds can be tapped from donor agencies, international institutions and Government grants.

Monitoring

There should be monitoring system

A responsible body to accomplish and enforce the compulsory requirements

Committees can be formed at the ward and tola level for monitoring.

Includewomen and youth

Capacity building

Enough resource should be there in the working institution, so that plan can be implemented.

Working staff in the institution should be provided with proper training.

Technical assistance

Technical assistance on waste water disposal can be sourced from NEERI Nagpur

International institutions can be approached for technical assistance.

Management

Involving private institutions for the management of public toilets and solid waste.

There should be one leader and four sub leaders for every road in Raipur city and should be given

with identity card which must be authorized by Nagar Nigam

Financing

There is no system for using recycled waste. Subsidy should be offered for treatment and reuse of

waste

The earnings of garbage workers should be linked to the payment of households. The households

should pay the garbage workers directly

Awareness

Awareness need

There is a need for the change in the attitude of people regarding sanitation. Creating awareness

among the people regarding sanitation &related health issues, solid waste disposal is necessary.

Awareness is needed to let people know their responsibility and to encourage them for their own

welfare and make them participate.



Creating awareness through different sources

Street Plays

Through the media

Door to door awareness by distributing pamphlets

Hoardings in restaurant parking areas in public places

Conducting competitions like drawings, paintings, debates, exhibitions etc .

There should be a chapter in the schools &college curriculum regarding sanitation.

Mohallasamitis, eco clubs, women groups and students groups can be formed for creating awareness

and ensuring a clean environment.It can also create sense of ownership among citizens.

Prizes should be given to the clean and beautiful colonies.

Theareas which are worst affected should be focused in the beginning

Time to time there should be awareness campaign by RMC/NGO‟s on the following aspects

Need for segregation of solid waste

Garbage should not be thrown away indrainage channels and should be disposed in containers kept

by RMC.

Harmful effects of open defecation

Leaders of the poor people should be incorporated in the task force so that they make aware poor

people about cleanliness.

If the city is to be developed as clean , healthy and beautiful then:

Participation of Youth and women is required.

Participation of the citizens of the city no matter what community they belong should be incorporated in

the planning process.

Let people to be emotionally attached in the way that they take planning process to their own benefit.

This is the key process of making any plan successful.

In identifying the stakeholders and educating them, priority has to be given to

Students

Slum Pockets

Religious place

Institutions

Hotel, restaurants, hospital

Dharmashala

Function/marriage hall

Others

Roads are not fully/well paved leading to dumping of waste at roadsides

There is a need for proper pond management



Need for rain water management

Adequate sanitation facilities for the floating population should be provided

Control diarrhea and other diseases

Old water pipes should be replaced

People must be aware of budgets, construction work taking place in their own wards.

Introduce enforcement

Political will is required to implement sanitation policy

Address

Dr. A. Boaz

Additional Chief Conservator of Forest

In the case of solid waste management, there is no point in segregating unless the downstream systems

are in place. If the household segregate the waste, the waste collectors normally don‟t. So the entire

system should be planned. The systems of waste management should be in place.

It is also required to examine whom we need to educate and create awareness. When the system of

rickshaw based solid waste collection was introduced in few posh housing colonies, the residents

refused to pay Rs. 20/month.

In creating awareness and behavioral change, we should stop wishful thinking and need to start

enforcing things.

Systems and practices that are eco-friendly need to be looked at.

The water bodies and lakes should be restored using ecosystem principles. Natural edge should be

given to water bodies at least for 50% of the perimeter. The flora and fauna could be damaged if

the lakes are dredged in one go. Eco-restoration of lakes has to be done.

Sewer lines in new developments should be mandatory

Use technology like GPS, to monitor the movement of vehicle carrying the city solid waste.

The Gaurav Path of Raipur,which is a major attraction of the city does not even have one dust bin or

even toilet.

It is required that all citizens start the change from their house and premises to make an effect in the

overall city.

Closing Remarks and Articulating the Vision

After the issue identification and discussion by the participants, the need for city sanitation task force

and city sanitation plan was felt with a clear vision of 100% sanitation. It was decided that city



sanitation task force would comprise of the members from all sections of the society, the core activities

of the task force would include :

Provide guidance in making of city sanitation plan

Actively participate in implementation of the plan

Primary responsibility in spreading of awareness

Support the training and capacity building exercises

Vote of Thanks

Dr. AmritChopra

Health Officer

Municipal Corporation, Raipur

Dr. Chopra thanked all the invitees and participants

The population of Raipur has increased tremendously after it has become the capital city. But the

capacity of health department at the Municipal Corporation has not increased and the old staff has

retired as well so there is a practical difficulty in maintaining the city cleanliness.

The sanitation scenario of Raipur being grim will be addressed with all citizens participation

The municipal Corporation will take active forward planning in achieving 100% sanitation



Originally proposed agenda for the meeting

4: 0 - 4: 5 PM Shri O.P. Chaudhary, Commissioner

Welcome address

4: 5 - 5:00 PM Smt Kiran MayeeNayak, Mayor

Key noteaddress

5:00 - 5:15 PM Sri. Sanjay Srivastav, Sabhapati

Citizens involvement in preparation of CSP

5:15 - 5:25 PM Dr. Pratibha Singh, GTZ

A brief on technical assistance to Raipur Nagar Nigam

5:25 - 5:45 PM Technical team

Presentation on City Sanitation Task Force (CTF)

5:45-7:15 PM Discussion and formulation of CTF

ModeratedbySri Alok Kumar Chandravanshi, Deputy

Commissioner

7:15 - 7:25 PM Technical team

Summarising the discussions

7:25-7:30PM Dr. Amrit Chopra, Health Officer

Vote of thanks



List of Participants

NAME ORGANISATION DESIGNATION PHONE

NUMBER

EMAIL ID

1 Smt.

KiranMayeeN

ayak

Nagar Nigam, Raipur Hon. Mayor

2 Sri. Sanjay

Srivastav

Nagar Nigam, Raipur Hon. Sabhapati

3 Sri.

AlokChandra

vanshi

Raipur Nagar Nigam Deputy

Commissioner

[email protected]

4 Dr.

PiyushPandey

BhilaiInstitute of Technology,

Raipur

Principal 9669871234

[email protected]

5 Sri. S.C. Jha Raipur development

authority, Raipur

Assistant

Engineer

9302809108 [email protected]

6 Sri. O.P.

Mishra

RMC Raipur In charge

Engineer


7 Dr.

AmritChopra

Nagar Nigam, Raipur Health Officer 9301953206 -

8 Sri. Prakash

Kumar Rabte

Regional office, CECB,

Raipur

Jr. Scientist 07712573897 -

9 Sri.

BhaskarDwive

di

CARDS, Raipur Director 9826158403 [email protected]

10 Sri. Shafique

Ahmed

Hotel Union Jn. Sec 9425502191 [email protected]

m

11 Sri.

R.N.Konher

PMU-JNNURM, Raipur Project

Specialist

9479174265 ravikonher@ hotmail.com

12 Sri. K.C.

Gilchrist

Christian Officers and

Leaders Association

Managing

Director


13 Sri. M.M.

Shakeel

SamajVikasDevelopmentSup

port Organisation

Research

Manager


14 Sri. Rakesh

Kumar Divya

SamajVikasDevelopment

Support Organisation

Research

Manager


15 Sri. R.K.

Sharma

Sankalp Secretary 9827958846 [email protected]

16 Mrs.

ArchanaBondr

iya

PMU-JNNURM, Anand

Nagar, Raipur

Specialist

(Social

Development

and Community

Mobilization)

9926166469 archanabondriya@rediffmail.

com

17 Sri.

SumangalUpa

dhaya

- Press Manager 9301953293

18 Sri.

S.K.Deshmukh

CTAG Former Deputy

General

Manager

(Project), Bhilai


mailto:[email protected]







Steel plant

19 Dr. N.D.

Mishra

Nagar Nigam, Raipur ZHO.5 9301953226

20 Dr.SamirBajp

ai

NIT, Raipur Associate Prof. 9826167065 [email protected]

21 Sri. RR.

Vishwakarma

PHE Project Dn., Raipur Assistant

Engineer


22 Sri. K.

Panigrahi

Centre for Ground Water

Recharge, Raipur

Sr.Hydro-

geologist

9424203408 paniwalapanigrahi@rediffmai

l.com

23 Sri. N.S.

Rathore

Nagar Nigam, Raipur EE 9301953212 -

24 Sri. Amit

Kumar Doye

Divine India Youth

Association (DIYA)

Coordinator 9926994842 [email protected]

25 Sri .A.K. Singh Sulabh International, Raipur Vice Chairman 0771 2241779 -

26 Sri. Md.

Aslam

Sulabh International, Raipur P.O 0771 2241779 -

27 Dr.

PreetamMishr

a

Municipal Corporation,

Raipur

ZHO 093019-

53230

-

28 Sri. J.K. Shah CARDS PO 9407007999 -

29 Dr. B. K.

Mishra

Nagar Nigam, Raipur ZHO 9301953233 -

30 Dr. Shiv

Sharma

Nagar Nigam, Raipur ZHO 9301953228 -

31 Prof. M. K.

Sharma

PMU-JNNURM, Anand

Nagar, Raipur

Coordinator

training and

research

9425290293 sharmamaheshkumar@yahoo.

co.in

32 Sri.

AlokMahawar

NIVAS(NirmanVikasAnusand

hanSansthan)

President 9827142100 [email protected]

33 Sri. Aseem

Mishra

PRIA (Participatory Research

in Asia)

Programme

officer


34 Sri.

UsatMahapat

ra

PRIA (Participatory Research

in Asia)

Animator 9300523319 usat.mahapatra_indosoft@ya

hoo.co.in

35

Dr. Alka

Singh

Regional Center for Urban

and Environmental Studies,

Lucknow (Ministry of

UD,GOI)

Coordinator,

PMU-JNNURM,

Chhattisgarh

06858-3029 [email protected],

[email protected]

36 Miss.

RuchiGortiya

Karunya International, President and

state convener


37 Dr. A. Boaz Additional

Conservator of

Forest











38 Mr. Dirk

Walther

GTZ Senior Advisor,

Indo-German

Environment

Programme-

ASEM,

Sustainable

Urban

Development

011

40610030/31

[email protected]

39 Sri. B.R.

Balachandran

Alchemy Urban Systems Director, 9343377911 [email protected]

40 Dr. Pratibha

Singh

GTZ Environmental Cell Consultant 9685713844 [email protected]

m

41 Ms. Rejitha

P.K.

Alchemy Urban Systems Project

Coordinator










ANNEXURE 14. POLICY PAPER – CITY SANITATION TASK FORCE

14.1. Background

The Ministry of Urban Development of India through its National Urban Sanitation Policyseeks to

address the gap in sanitation infrastructure and move Indian cities towards Total

Sanitation,through a „Systems‟ driven approach. Therefore equal or greater importance has been

awarded, in the City Sanitation Planning (CSP) process, to development of local institutions, a

systematic process of community awareness generation as well as long term monitoring and

evaluation of sanitation status in the urban area.

Therefore the following document describes in brief the National urban Sanitation Policy – its

objectives, need for City Sanitation Task Force, its institutional structure, preparing a City

Sanitation Plan, stages of involvement and the idea of working groups.

14.2. An overview of the National Urban Sanitation Policy

14.2.1. Vision

The Ministry of Urban Development of India envisages the vision for Urban Sanitation as “All

Indian cities and towns become totally sanitized, healthy and live-able and ensure and sustain

good public health and environmental outcomes for all their citizens with a special focus on

hygienic and affordable sanitation facilities for the urban poor and women” (Ministry of Urban

development, 2008). To achieve this goal the Government through the policy encourages cities to

introduce a „City Sanitation Task Force (CTF)‟ at city- level. The task force, to perform in a better

way should have a particular agenda, an organization setup, specific roles and responsibilities

and also time chart to follow.

14.2.2. Objectives of the policy

The overall goal of this policy is to transform Urban India into community driven, totally sanitized,

healthy and liveable cities and towns. The specific goals are:

Awareness Generation and Behaviour Change:

Generating awareness amongst communities and institutions about sanitation, adoption of healthy

sanitation practices and its linkages with public and environmental health

Open Defecation Free Cities:

Provision of safe and hygienic sanitation facilities for the urban dwellers to control open

defecation and environmental hazards

Integrated City-Wide Sanitation:

Mainstreaming sanitation and re-orienting institutional thinking, planning and implementing

measures related to sanitationin all sectors and departmental domains as a cross-cutting



issue.Waste from all the sanitation facilities including human excreta and liquid wastes must be

disposed of safely.

Proper Operation & Maintenance of all Sanitary Installations:

Strengthening ULBs to provide sustainable sanitation services and promoting proper usage,

regular upkeep and maintenance of household,community and public sanitation facilities

14.3. Legal Status of the CTF

The CTF shall be a non-statutory body. However it is recommended that a council resolution be

passed recognizing the CTF as body that will be involved in achieving the goals of the National

Urban Sanitation Policy.

14.4. Key Roles and Responsibilities

1. The CTF must participate in a multi-stakeholder, multi-party meeting in the preparatory

stage, and take a formal resolution to make the city 100% Sanitized, and publicize the

same.

2. The City Sanitation Task Force will be responsible for:

Launching the City wide 100% Sanitation Campaign

Generating awareness amongst the city‟s citizens and stakeholders

Approving materials and progress reports provided by the implementing agency, other

public agencies, as well as NGOs and private parties contracted by the Implementing

Agency, for different aspects of implementation

Approving the City Sanitation Plan for the city prepared by the Sanitation Implementation

Agency after consultations with citizens

Undertaking field visits from time to time to supervise progress

Issue briefings to the press/media and state government about progress

Providing overall guidance to the Implementation Agency

Recommend to the ULB about fixing of responsibilities for city-wide sanitation on a

permanent basis

14.5. Institutional structure

The CTF at local level shall constitute the different parts of the public, private, community and

voluntary sectors; allowing different initiatives and services to support one another so that they

can work together more effectively. The Urban Local Body shall be the nodal implementing

agency for implementing the City Sanitation Plan



Public bodies

Urban Local Bodies ( ULBs)

Urban Development

Authority (UDA)

Departments working on

water supply, solid waste,

drainage, etc

Civil Society

Public Health Engineering Department

People from civic affairs, health, urban

poverty

Private Organisations

Contractors working in sanitation

sector

Chamber of commerce

Other professional

groups

Hoteliers

Industries

Market association

Voluntary Organisations -

NGO's

Water and Sanitation

Urban development

and slums

Health and Environment

Service providers

Unions of safai karamcharis,

Sewerage sanitary workers,

Recycling agents /

kabaris, etc

Stakeholders

Cultural institutions

Education intitutions

Representative of cantonment

area

Communities

Slum areas

RWA's

NGO's

The following is an illustrative list of stakeholders who can become members of the CTF.



14.6. Working Groups

It is proposed that different working groups be created in CTF to ensure focused efforts to

different aspects of the sanitation planning and implementation. Illustrative list of working groups

and possible stakeholders who can participate are as follows:

1. Technical core group (TCG)

City engineers

Sanitation related service provider agencies

Para-statal agencies

Other private sector engineers

2. Voices of the Economically Weaker Section

NGOs working with the urban poor

3. Sanitation Awareness Group

Institutions, schools

NGOs

4. The city residents’ group

RWAs‟

Cantonment

Housing board colonies

5. City growth and development group

Chamber of commerce, hoteliers

Builders & developers

14.7. Meetings and Consultations

The CTF shall convene once in 2 months for undertaking progress review and discussion of key

issues pertaining to the planning and implementation

The CTF working groups shall convene once a month of focused discussions at the planning

stage. Thereafter it may convene once in 2 months

The individual members of the CTF shall participate in informal consultations with the planning

agency to guide and inform the process



14.8. Draft Standard Operational Procedures

14.8.1. City Sanitation Task Force

Call for Meetings

The Municipal Corporation shall appoint one officer for organizing and coordinating the CTF

meetings. This officer shall send invitation letters to the members of the CTF at least 1 week prior

to the decided date of the CTF meeting. This shall include the agenda for the meeting.

Conducting meetings

Each meeting shall discuss issues as per agenda laid out for the meeting first. In addition the head

of each working group shall briefly outline the progress of work and key concerns pertaining to

that working group‟s focus area.

Towards the end of the meeting the tentative agenda and date for the next meeting shall be

decided.

Documentation of Proceedings

The municipal officer in-charge of the CTF meetings shall organize for each meeting to be

recorded in the form of minutes, clearly outlining the summary of discussions, decisions taken and

action points recorded with responsibility allocation. Each „Minutes of Meeting‟ shall be prepared

and sent to the members of the CTF within a week from the date of meeting

14.8.2. CTF Working Groups

Call for meetings

The working groups shall appoint one person to head each group. The working group meetings

can be held at a mutually convenient place and time once a month. The meetings can be called for

through informal communication (phone, email, letters)

Conducting and documenting meetings

In addition the task of documenting proceedings may be taken up in rotation by the different

members of the working group. The minutes of meeting shall be prepared and shared at the next

CTF meeting with the other members of the CTF.



ANNEXURE 15. ORGANOGRAM OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION



ANNEXURE 16. WARD SELECTION FOR PILOT AWARENESS CAMPAIGN

This note details out the selection of wards for pilot awareness campaign. Most of the wards within

RMC have similar problems with regard to sanitation. However, it is required to prioritise based

on the severity of the issue.

Please note that where ever urban poor is referred, it includes slums, low income settlements and

villages together.

16.1. Approach toward selection

The wards that have to be selected for pilot awareness campaign need to be of high impact

value. These wards should demonstrate the wide range of issues that need awareness generation.

Thus the wards to be selected should represent

Wide range of issues to be addressed

Wide range of target groups

Wide range of messages to capture to carry out the campaign in other wards

16.2. Selection criteria

Land use, socio-economic profile and access to toilets are used as the selection criteria. Each ward

is prioritized as High, Mediumor Low prioritybased on these parameters.The selection criteria are

explained as below.

Landuse pattern – Wards which have predominantlyslums, villages, low income settlements

and commercial (small shops) are givenhigh priority. The wards with predominantly middle

income residential and large commercialareas were given medium priority and the wards

with predominantly high income residential and institutional were given low priority.

Land use Priority level

Slums, villages, low income

settlements and commercial (small

shops)

High

Middle income residential and large

commercial areas

Medium

High income residential and

institutions

Low

Socio-economic profile–Wards which have predominantly low income settlements were

given high priority. Wards which have predominantly mix of low as well as middle income

settlements were given medium priority and wards which have predominantly mix of

middle income as well as high income were given low priority.\

Socio-economic profile Priority level



Predominant low income settlements High

Mix of low as well as middle income

settlements

Medium

Mix of middle income as well as high

income settlements

Low

Wastewater disposal mechanism -Wards having predominantly no system for disposal

and are draining the wastewater into open drains/nallasare given high priority.Wards

having predominantly septic tanks and the overflow is drained in to the open drains are

given medium priority and the wards having predominantly municipal sewer network or

septic tanks are given low priority.

Wastewater disposal mechanism Priority level

No system, open drainage/nalla High

Septic tank &open nalla Medium

Septic tank& Municipal sewer

network

Low

Access to toilets- Wards having predominantly open defecation are given high priority.

Wards having predominantly community toilets or a combination of individual and

community toilets were given medium priority and the wards having predominantly

individual toiletswere given low priority.

Access to toilets Priority level

Open defecation,

Community toilets and open

defecation

Individual toilets and open

defecation

Individual, community and open

defecation

High

Individual and community toilets

Community toilets

Medium

Individual toilets Low

16.3. Prioritization of wards

In each ward, all the parameters used for selection criteria are prioritized as low, medium and

high. Scoring for each criterion is done and all the scores were added up to arrive final scores to

decide the priority order. Most of the wards were of equal final scores. So those with the first

three scores are categorized as Category A, Category B and Category C. All the wards in

Category A have the same level of issues and same priority and similarly for Category B and

Category C. The table is shown below.



Selection Criteria for Detailed Ward Survey

Attributes/ Parameters

Ward

No. Ward Name Land Use pattern

Scoring

_LU

pattern Socio economic profile

Scoring

_socio

econom

ic

profile Wastewater disposal mechanism

Scoring_W

astewater

disposal

mechanis

m Access to sanitation

Scoring_

acc to

sanitatio

n

Scori

ng

Priority

category

29

NetajeeSubash

Chandra Bosh

Residential, Commercial(

large shops),College,

offices, Religious,Slum

and water bodies,Open

land and agricultural 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Open drainage/Open nalla> No

system > Septic tank & open nalla 3

Open defecation

>Individual&OD> Individual 3 12 A

53 MureshwarRaoGadre

Commercial(small shops),

school, Religious, Open

land ,Slums,

Khadan/Dabri 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Open drainage/Open nalla 3 Indi_comm& OD 3 12 A

4 YatiyatanLal

Residential, Industrial,

Commercial,Mixed use,

Market, Villages, slums,

Open land,

Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank > No system 2

Open defecation > Individual &

Open defecation > Individual 3 11 B

5 Banjari Mata Mandir

Residential, Mixed use,

Slums, School,

Commercial, Open land,

Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank & open nalla> Septic tank 2 Open defecation > Individual 3 11 B

7 Veer Shivajee

Residential, Slum,

Commercial, Godowns,

religious, and Water

bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank > No system 2

Open defecationv> Individual &

Open defecation > Individual >

Individual_comm_&OD 3 11 B

12

ShaheedManmohan

Singh Bakshi


slums, Commercial,

Hotels/Guest house,

Open land, Agricultural,

and Water bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank > Septic tank & open nalla 2

Individual&OD>Indi_comm&OD>

Open defecation > Individual 3 11 B

18

SardarBallahBhai

Patel

Residential, Slums,

School, Open land and

Water bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank > Septic tank & open nalla 2 Indi_comm&OD> Individual 3 11 B

19 SantRamdas

Residential, Commercial

(large shops),Slums,

offices, School, Open

land 3

Predominantly low


Indi_comm&OD>Community&OD

> Open defecation, 3 11 B

23 Rani LaxmiBai Residential, Slums,

Market, School, 3

Predominantly low 3 Septic tank > Septic tank & Open nalla 2

Community&OD>Individual&OD3 11 B



Colleges, Religious and

Waterbodies

income > Individual

27

Dr.

BhimRaoAmbedkar

Residential,

Commercial(small

shops),Mixed use, Slums,

Market, Hospital, School,

Offices,Slum and water

bodies,Open land and

agricultural 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Open Drainage/Open nalla> Septic

tank > No system 3

Individual > Open defecation

>Individual&OD 2 11 B

38 Tatya Para

Residential,


Mixed use, Slums,

Market, College,

Religious 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank & open nalla> Septic tank 2 Indi_comm&OD>Individual&OD 3 11 B

46 Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Residential,

Commercial(Large

shops), Community

halls/cinema halls/

auditorium, Hotels/Guest

house, Mixed use, Slums,

Market, School,

Colleges,

Offices,Religious,

Village, Slum and water

bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Open drainage/open nalla> Septic

tank > No system > Septic tank & open

nalla> Municipal Sewer network 3


>Individual&Community>Indi_co

mm&OD>Community&OD 2 11 B

49 Pt. Motilal Nehru

Residential, Slums,


Colleges, Offices,Slum,

open land and

agricultural 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Open drainage/Open nalla> Septic

tank & open nalla 3 Individual >Community&OD 2 11 B

52 Chandra Shekar Azad

Residential,


Dairy, Hospital, Mixed

use, Slums, Market,

School, Village, open

land, Agricultuaral and

waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Open drainage/Open nalla 3


>Indi_comm&OD>Individual&OD 2 11 B

59 Kankali Para

Schools,

Residential,Mixed use,

Slums,Open land 3

Predominantly low

income 3


tank & open nalla 3

Individual > Community

>Individual&Community 2 11 B

63

Dr. Shyam Prasad

Mukharjee

Commercial(large

shops), Dairy, Small

industries,

Schools,Residential,

Mixed use, Slums,Open

land, Village, 3

Predominantly low


Individual >Indi_comm&OD>

Open defecation 2 11 B



Agricultural and Water

bodies

3 SantKabir Das

Residential, Industrial,

School, Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3


tank & open nalla 3 Community > Individual 1 10 C

6 Virangana Avanti Bai

Residential, School,

College, Offices, Open

land and Water bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank & open nalla> Septic tank 2

Individual >Community&Open

defecation 2 10 C

9 ThakkarBapa


Slums, and Water

bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Septic tank & open nalla> Septic tank

> Open drainage/Open nalla 2


>Individual&Open defecation

>Individual_comm&OD 2 10 C

11 DaanvirBhama Shah


Commercial, Offices,

Open lands, Agricultural,

Logistics, and Water

bodies 2

Predominantly low


Indi_comm&OD>Community&OD

> Individual >Individual&OD 3 10 C

14

Pt.IshwariCharanShau

kla

(Predominantly

institutional) Residential,

Slums, Village,

Commercial, Schools,

Colleges, Logistics, Open

land and Waterbodies 1

Predominantly low

income 3


tank & open nalla> Municipal sewer

network > No system 3

Individual&OD> Open

defecation > Individual 3 10 C

21 Raman Mandir

Residential, slums, Mixed

use, Offices, Market 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Septic tank & Open nalla> Septic tank

> Open Drainage/Open nalla, 2

Individual

>Community&OD>Indi_comm&O

D 2 10 C

22 Rajeev Gandhi

Residential, Slums,


Market, Community

halls/cinema halls/

auditorium, School,

Offices, Open land,

Burial ground, 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank > Septic tank & Open nalla 2

Individual&Community>

Individual >Individual&OD, 2 10 C

26 KushaBhauThakare

Small Industries, School,

Residential, slums,

Village, Waterbodies,

Open land and

agricultural 2 Low and middle 2

Open Drainage/Open nalla, Septic

tank and Septic tank & Open nalla 3 Individual&OD> Individual 3 10 C

33 LalBahadurShashtri

High income and Low

income residential, Slums 3

Predominantly low

income 3

No system > Municipal Sewer network

> Septic tank, and 3 Community > Individual 1 10 C

34 Guru Govind Singh

Residential,


Mixed use, Slums,

School, Religious 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Septic tank & open nalla> Open

drainage/Open nalla 2

Community > Individual

>Individual&OD 2 10 C



42 Civil Line

Residential,


Community halls/cinema

halls/ auditorium,

Hotels/Guest house,

Mixed use,

Slums,Hospital, School,

Colleges,

Offices,Religious, Slum

and water bodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Septic tank > Open drainage/open

nalla> Municipal Sewer network 2 Individual >Community&OD 2 10 C

43 Mother Teresa


Hospital, School,


and water bodies 2 Middle and low income 2


tank > Septic tank & open nalla 3

Community&OD>Individual&Com

munity, > Individual > Community

> Open defecation, 3 10 C

50

ShaheedPankajVikra

m

Residential,

Commercial(small and

large shops), Large

industries,

Hotels/Guesthouse,

Mixed use, Slums,


Offices,Slum, open land

and waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3


tank > Municipal Sewer network 3 Individual > Community 1 10 C

58 BrahamanPapra

Mixed use, low income

residential 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Open drainage/Open nalla 3 Individual 1 10 C

60 Thakur Pyarelal


Schools,College,


Slums,Open land,

Agricultural 3 Low and middle 2

Open drainage/Open nalla> No

system > Septic tank & open nalla 3

Community > Individual

>Individual&OD 2 10 C

65

KamaredSudhirMukarj

ee

Low income residential,

Open land, Agricultural

and Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Open drainage/Open nalla 3 Individual 1 10 C

70 SantBavi Das

Agricultural, small

Industries, Waterbodies,

Villages,slums,

commercial 3

Predominantly low

income 3


drainage/Open nalla 2 Individual > Open defecation 2 10 C

1 Veer Savarkar Nagar

Predominantly

agricultural, Logistics,

Industrial, Residential,

Commercial, markets,

Dairy, Villages, Water

bodies 2 Middle and low income 2



Individual & Open defecation >

Individual > Open defecation 3 9 D



2

Ram Krishna

Paramhansh

Industrial, Residential,

Mixed use, Hospital,

Schools, Commercial,

Slums, Logistics,

Waterbodies 2 Low ,middle income 2


tank > Septic tank & open nalla 3

Community >Individual&Open

defecation > Individual > Open

defecation

>Individual&Community 2 9 D

8

NetajeeKanahaiyaLal

Bajari


slums, Water bodies 3 Low and middle 2




>Individual&Open defecation 2 9 D

16

ShaheedChudaManin

ayak

Residential, Slums,

Commercial (large

shops), Markets,


halls/ auditorium,

Hospitals, School, and

Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3

Septic tank > Open Drainage/ Open

nalla 2 Individual 1 9 D

25 Mahatma Gandhi

Residential,


Mixed use, Slums,


Slum and water bodies 2 Low and middle 2

Septic tank > Septic tank & Open

nalla> Open Drainage/Open nalla 2

Indi_comm&OD> Individual >

Open defecation

>Individual&OD 3 9 D

32

Shaheed Veer

narayan Singh

Residential,


large shops),

Hotel/Guest house,

Dairy, School, College,

Religious,Slum, Open

land and water bodies 2 Low and middle 2


> Municipal Sewer network 2

Open defecation > Individual

>Individual&OD 3 9 D

37 Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru

Residential,

Commercial(large and

small shops), Mixed use,

Slums, Market, School,

Religious 2 Low and middle income 2 Septic tank > Septic tank & open nalla 2 Indi_comm&OD>Individual&OD 3 9 D

40 Babu Jag Jeevan Ram

Residential,



halls/ auditorium,

Hotels/Guest house,

Mixed use, Slums,


Offices,Slum and water

bodies 2 Low and middle income 2


tank & open nalla> Septic tank > No

system > Municipal Sewer network 3


>Individual&Community>Commu

nity&OD 2 9 D

41 Maulana Abdul Rauf

Residential,


shops), Mixed use,

Slums, Market, Hospital,

School, Colleges, 2 Middle and low income 2

Open drainage/open nalla> Municipal

Sewer network > Septic

tank&opennalla 3

Individual >Community&OD>

Open defecation 2 9 D




44 Guru Ghasi Das

Residential,

Commercial(Large

shops), School,


and water bodies 2 Middle and low income 2


tank 3


Community >Community&OD>


47 L.T.Arvind Dixit

Residential, School,

Religious, Commercial

(small shops) 2

Predominantly low

income 3

Municipal Sewer network > Septic tank

> Septic tank & open nalla> Open

drainage/open nalla 2 Individual >Individual&OD 2 9 D

51 Ravindranath Tagore

Residential,


large shops), Small

industries, Religious,

Slums, Market,

Hospital,Village, open

land and waterbodies 2 Low and middle 2

Septic tank > Septic tank & open

nalla> Open drainage/Open nalla>

No system 2

Indi_comm&OD>Individual&OD>



55

ShaheedBrigradiarUs

mann Residential, Slums 3

Predominantly low

income 3


drainage/Open nalla 2 Individual 1 9 D

56 De. VipinBihariSoor

Low income residential,

Slums, Open land,

Agricultural and

Waterbodies 3

Predominantly low

income 3 Septic tank & open nalla 2 Individual 1 9 D

64 VamanRaoLakhe


Slum, School, Market,

and Waterbodies 3 Low and middle 2 Open drainage/Open nalla 3


Individual > Community 1 9 D

67 Khoob Chand Baghel

Commercial(Large

shops), Residential,

Village, Open land,

Agricultural and

Waterbodies 2

Predominantly middle


Individual&OD>Community&OD

> Individual > Open defecation 3 9 D

68 MadhavRaoSapre

Commercial(large

shops), Market,


halls, Dairy, Small

Industries, Hospitals,

Schools,College,

Religious, Residential,

Villages, Logistics, Open

land and Agricultural 2


income 1


tank & open nalla 3

Community&OD> Open

defecation >Individual&OD>

Individual 3 9 D

13 ShaheedBhagat Singh

Commercial, Community

halls/cinema halls/

auditorium, Hospitals, 2 Middle and low 2

Septic tank > Open drainage/Open

nalla> Septic tank & open nalla>

Municipal sewer network 2

Individual >Community&OD>

Open defecation 2 8 D



Schools, Religious,

Residential, Slums,

Logistics, Water bodies

24

Pt. Ravi Shankar

Shukla

Residential,


Hotels/Guest house,

Offices, Slums, Market,

School, Colleges,

Religious and

Waterbodies 2 Low and middle 2 Septic tank & Open nalla> Septic tank 2

Individual

>Individual&Community>Individu

al&OD 2 8 D

30 Kalimata

Residential,

Commercial(smallshops),

Hotel/Guest house,

School, College,

Religious,Slum and water

bodies,Open land 2 Low and middle 2


drainage/Open nalla> No system 2


>Individual&OD> Open

defecation 2 8 D

45 RanuDurgaVati

Residential,

Commercial(Large

shops), Hotels/Guest

house, Mixed

use,School,

Offices,Religious,

Village, Slum and water

bodies 2


income 1


tank & open nalla> Septic tank 3

Individual

>Individual&Community> Open

defecation >Community&OD 2 8 D

48

Pt.

BhagavatiCharanShuk

la

Residential,


large shops),

Hotels/Guesthouse,

Mixed use, Slums,


Colleges, Religious,

Offices,Slum 2


income 1

Municipal Sewer network > Open

drainage/open nalla> Septic tank >

No system 2

Community&OD> Individual >

Community 3 8 D

57 Swami Vivakanand



halls/ auditorium,

Hospital, school,


mixed use, ,Slums 2


income 1


tank 3


>Individual&Community>

Community 2 8 D

61

MahantLaxmi

Narayan Das

Schools,College,Offices,


Slums,Open land,

Agricultural and

Waterbodies 2



Individual

>Individual&Community>

Community 2 8 D

62 MahamayaMandir Commercial(large

shops), Schools,Offices, 2


income 1


tank & open nalla 3

Individual >Indi_comm&OD>

Community >Community&OD 2 8 D




Slums,Open land,

Agricultural and Water

bodies

66 Pt. Sundarlal Sharma


shops), Hospitals,

Schools,College,

Residential, Slums,Open

land, Agricultural and

Waterbodies 2


income 1

Open drainage/Open nalla> Municipal

sewer network 3


>Individual&Community 2 8 D

10

Baal Ganga

DharTilak

Residential, Commercial,

schools, slums, and

Waterbodies 2


income 1 Septic tank & open nalla> Septic tank 2 Individual >Individual&OD 2 7 E

15 Swami Atmanand

Residential, Slums,

Railway station, Logistics,

Schools, Colleges,

Offices, Open land and

Water bodies 3 Low and middle 2 Septic tank > Septic tank & open nalla 1 Individual 1 7 E

17 Ram Sagar Para


Slums, Small industries,

Open land, Railways 3


income 1

Septic tank & Open nalla> Open

Drainage/ Open nalla> Septic tank 2 Individual >Individual&OD 1 7 E

28 MaharshiBalmiki

Residential,


large shops),Market,

Hotel/Guest house,

Hospital, School,

Religious,Slum and water

bodies,Open land and

agricultural 2

predominantly middle

income 1


> Open drainage/Open nalla 2 Individual >Individual&OD 2 7 E

31 Shankar Nagar

Residential,

Commercial(smallshops),

Hotel/Guest house,

School, College,

Religious,Slum, Open

land 2

predominantly middle

income 1




>Individual&OD 2 7 E

35 HsaheedHemuKalani

Residential,


small shops), Mixed use,

Slums, Market, Hospital,

School, Offices, Bus stop,

Religious 2


income 1

Septic tank > Septic tank/open nalla>

Municipal Sewer network 2


>Indi_comm&OD>Individual&Co

mmunity,Individual&OD 2 7 E

36

Hawaldar Abdul

Hameed

Residential,



halls/ auditorium, Mixed 1 Low and middle income 2

Septic tank > Open drainage/Open

nalla 2


>Individual&Community>Indi_co

mm&OD 2 7 E



use, Slums, Market,

Hospital, School,

Colleges, Offices,Slum

39 Sadar Bazar

Commercial(Large

shops), Mixed use,

Offices,School, Low

income residential 2


income 1 Septic tank 1 Individual&OD> Individual 3 7 E

69 Pt.DindayalUpadhaya

Commercial(large

shops),

Hotels/Guesthouse,

auditorium, Hospitals,

Schools,College, Offices


Slums, Logistics, Water

bodies 2


income 1


drainage/Open nalla> Septic tank 2

Individual

>Indi_comm&OD>Individual&OD 2 7 E

54

Shaheed Rajeev

Pandey


Religious, Open land ,

Agricultural, Mixed use,

low income residential 2


income 1



Individual

>Individual&Community 1 6 E

20 Indira Gandhi

Commercial(large

shops), small shops,


halls/ auditorium, School,

Religious, Open land,

Burial ground,

Residential, mixed use,

Water bodies and

drains 2


income 1 Septic tank 1 Individual 1 5 E



The selection of wards for pilot

awareness campaign needs to be a

political decision of RMC. However,

it is recommended that the following

parameters is to be used for the

selection

Each ward should be from different

category listed here. i.e. one ward

can be of Category A and the other

of Category C, so that not just

similar issues are addressed.

Location of the ward. One ward can

be from the core area of the city

and other from the peripheral area,

so that wide range of concerns of

the stakeholders are addressed

Figure 1Map showing the priority wards

16.4. Comparison of Prioritized wards:

Many wards in RMC present the same picture and are in need of awareness campaign. However

the wards which fall in the worst sanitation scenario are classified as Category A, Category B and

Category C. All of them are listed in this section and a comparison of various decision making

parameters are also presented.

16.4.1. Category A

The highest priority wards are Ward No. 29 (NetajiSubash Chandra Bose) and Ward No. 53

(MureshwarRaoGadre).

The percentage of urban poor population in Ward 53 is higher than Ward 29

Percentage of population who dispose of waste water to open drainage channels/ nalla

are higher in Ward 53.

In ward 53 there is more of open defecation, even though there is some level of accessto

individual and community toilets

11.4.1.2 Population/Urban poor population in the priority wards

Ward No. Ward name Total population Urban poor

population

% of Urban

poor

population

29 NetajiSubash Chandra Bose 17670 13306 75.30

53 MureshwarRaoGadre 24054 24054 100.00



11.4.1.2 Waste water disposal mechanism

11.4.1.3 Access to toilets

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

29 53

CATEGORY A - WASTE WATER DISPOSAL MECHANISM

No_System

Open_Drainage/Open_Nalla

Septic_Tank_&_Open_Nalla

Septic_tank

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

29 53

CATEGORY A - ACCESS TO TOILET

Open_Defecation

Individual_&_OD

Indi_Commu_&_OD

Individual



16.4.2. Category B

There are 14 wards in Category B as the next priority.

The percentage of urban poor population in Ward 19 and 18 are the highest


are highest in Ward 63, 49 and 27

Except Ward 59 all the wards have open defecation


Ward

No.

Ward name Total population Urban poor

population

% of Urban

poor

population

4 YatiyatanLal 20256 18782 92.72

5 Banjari Mata Mandir 21120 19215 90.98

7 Veer Shivajee 21440 16079 75.00

12 ShaheedManmohan Singh

Bakshi

20527 17642 85.95

18 SardarBallahBhai Patel 17210 16858 97.95

19 SantRamdas 15962 15962 100.00

23 Rani LaxmiBai 20531 15822 77.06

27 Dr. BhimRaoAmbedkar 22859 14446 63.20

38 Tatya Para 14187 10194 71.85

46 Dr. Rajendra Prasad 21446 14623 68.19

49 Pt. Motilal Nehru 18025 14196 78.76

52 Chandra Shekar Azad 13049 11143 85.39

59 Kankali Para 11211 10337 92.20

63 Dr. Shyam Prasad Mukharjee 21541 19043 88.40




11.4.2.3 Access to toilets

16.4.3. Category C

There are 17 wards in Category C as the next priority.

The percentage of urban poor population in Ward 65, 70 and 3 are the highest


are highest in Ward 65, 3, 14, 43 and 58

Open defecation is highest in Ward 14, 43, 11, 26 and 34

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

4 5 7 12 18 19 23 27 38 46 49 52 59 63

CATERGORY B - WASTE WATER DISPOSAL MECHANISM

No_System



Septic_tank

Muni_Sewer_Network

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

4 5 7 12 18 19 23 27 38 46 49 52 59 63

CATEGORY B - ACCESS TO TOILET

Open_Defecation

Community_&_OD

Individual_&_OD

Indi_Commu_&_OD

Individual_&_Community

Community

Individual




Ward Total

population

Urban poor

population

% of Urban

poor

population

3 SantKabir Das 21306 20819 97.71

6 Virangana Avanti Bai 17474 13613 77.90

9 ThakkarBapa 20097 15667 77.96

11 DaanvirBhama Shah 14554 11620 79.84

14 Pt.IshwariCharanShaukla 17588 15846 90.10

21 Raman Mandir 16195 15109 93.29

22 Rajeev Gandhi 19495 15854 81.32

26 KushaBhauThakare 14934 9387 62.86

33 LalBahadurShashtri 16533 15880 96.05

34 Guru Govind Singh 13302 10860 81.64

42 Civil Line 15039 10806 71.85

43 Mother Teresa 18049 8775 48.62

50 ShaheedPankajVikram 12430 9827 79.06

58 BrahamanPapra 12414 11163 89.92

60 Thakur Pyarelal 12425 7480 60.20

65 KamaredSudhirMukarjee 12001 12001 100.00

70 SantBavi Das 13745 13745 100.00


0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

3 6 9 11 14 21 22 26 33 34 42 43 50 58 60 65 70

CATEGORY C - WASTEWATER DISPOSAL MECHANISM

No_System



Septic_tank

Muni_Sewer_Network



11.4.3.3 ACCESS TO TOILETS

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

3 6 9 11 14 21 22 26 33 34 42 43 50 58 60 65 70

CATEGORY C - ACCESS TO SANITATION

Individual

Individual_&_Community

Community

Individual_&_OD

Community_&_OD

Indi_Commu_&_OD

Open_Defecation



16.5. Wards already recommended by GTZ - ASEM Environment Cell, Raipur

The wards suggested by GTZ are

1. Ward 34 (Guru Gobind Singh Ward)

High density of slum population in the city

People‟s participation has been demonstrated in construction of community toilet complex

People active and ensures that the drains and streets get cleaned by following up with the

Councillor of the Ward.

2. Ward 19 (SantRamdas Ward)

Located in highly congested business area of the city

slum area mostly has pucca houses but is classified as a slum due to absence of piped

water supply and house hold latrines

The 2 wards suggested by GTZ are in the first three categories of priority wards identified by the

team. Ward 34 is in Category C and Ward 19 is in category B. So both of them can be selected

for pilot awareness campaign.

The following graphs compare the population/ urban poor population, access to toilet and waste

water disposal mechanism.

Population Access to toilet

Waste water disposal mechanism

Annexures - Home | SSWM · 2018-02-12 · ANNEXURE 12. LIST OF WATER BODIES AND THEIR DETAILS ..... 180 ANNEXURE 13. MINUTES OF THE CTF ... Task 4.Conducting Awareness Generation

Documents