Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

1/34

Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25)

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

2/34

Notable Headlines

Ann Marie Buerkle under pressure over her support for Medicare overhaul [The Post-Standard,6/27/11]

Palin Continues Support of Buerkle [capitoltonight.com,7/15/11]

Residents gather in Manlius to hear Buerkle defend Ryan Medicare plan [Eagle Observer, 7/04/11]

Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle rushes to swearing-in ceremony, waits and misses her first House vote[Syracuse.com,1/05/11]

Freshman GOPer Didn't Know Government Paid For Her Health Benefits [TPMDC, 2/4/11]

Editorials

Greece Post: Heating-Aid Change Could Leave Many in the Cold

In November 2011, a Greece Post editorial called for Buerkle to put aside party loyalty and ensure thatthose who need heating aid get the assistance they need. New York could lose $85 million in Low IncomeHome Energy Assistance funds if the House version of the $3.4 billion program passes. [Greece Post,Editorial,11/15/11]

Mes senger Post : Buerkles Tried to [Turn] Back the Clock By Cutting Planned Parenthood

In March 2011, the Messenger Post editorial board criticized Buerkles statements that her vote to

eliminate federal funding was not motivated by ideology.

If theres anything that makes the House Republicans budget cutting appear to be driven more byideology than fiscal prudence, its the provision taking all federal funding some $330 million awayfrom Planned Parenthood, the board wrote. This budget cut has very little to do with saving money. It ispart of the larger goal of turning back the clock, not just on abortion, but on birth control and access toreproductive health services that have saved or improved countless lives. And Rep. Buerkle shouldntsound so shocked when that fact is pointed out. [Messenger Post, 3/14/11]

Budget IssuesSaid Our Worst Fears Came True When Super Committee Collapsed

In November 2011, Buerkle reaffirmed her opposition to the Budget Control Act and said that it was not agood idea to hand over power to the 12-person Super Committee.

2

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

3/34

Buerkle said the committee failed because Democrats would not put entitlements on the table andRepublicans would not raise taxes. Buerkle said she would not be open to tax increases and said shewould have looked at cutting stimulus funds.

Buerkle did not support changing automatic cuts that were to take place. She said, Thats what the

American people are so disgusted about with Washington, where they change the rules as they go. Ithought it was a bad idea. But those who voted for this Budget Control Act, this is exactly what theysigned up for. And unfortunately all of the things we do in Washington have consequences. [syracuse.com,11/22/11]

Criticized Super Committee Failure

In November 2011, Buerkle criticized the Super Committee failure at a town hall meeting andcalled automatic cuts set to go into effect draconian.

When asked about the Grover Norquist tax pledge, Buerkle acknowledged that she signed thepledge but her constituents and not raising taxes were more important. She said, My pledge isntto Grover Norquist. My pledge is to the people of this district. I wont raise your taxes. [TheCitizen,11/23/11]

Concerned About Potential Deep Cuts If Deficit Panel Failed to Meet Deadline

In November 2011, Buerkle expressed concern about deep cuts that could emerge if the deficit reductionpanel failed to reach a compromise, and said that the potential for deep cuts reaffirmed her opposition tothe Super Committee

Buerkle said, That's why I voted against the Budget Control Act, because I didn't think delegating ourauthority to 12 members was the right thing to do. I know what's best for the people of the 25th District.

It's unfortunate, but I think and I'm optimistic that they will reach an agreement. Buerkle said that shewas especially concerned about potential deep cuts in defense spending and the impact on veterans.[centralny.ynn.com,11/11/11]

Buerkle: Cut, Cap, and Balance Would Have Avoided Downgrade

In October 2011, Buerkle affirmed her support for Cut, Cap, and Balance and said that it would haveavoided the S&P downgrade.

Buerkle said that S&P talked about the downgrade because we failed to put out any sort of mid-term orlong-term plan. She also discussed concerns she had with the final debt ceiling bill and said, I just never

got past those concerns. Those questions weren't answered. No one could assure me that we weren't goingto raise taxes -- that there wasn't a loophole (in the bill) to raise taxes. [auburnpub.com, 10/10/11]

Said She Would Have Voted Against Final Debt Ceiling Compromise Even if the Vote was Closer

In August 2011, Buerkle was the only Republican in New York and one of 66 Republicans in the Houseto vote against the final debt ceiling compromise.

3

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

4/34

Buerkle said she objected to the bipartisan committee charged with coming up with deficit-reductionlegislation and to the automatic trigger provision.

Buerkle said, That seems like a bad way to govern, by defaultThats the role of Congress todetermine where we are going to cut.

Buerkle said she would have voted against the bill even if the vote had been closer and risked default.Asked if default was a real possibility without legislation she said, No one knows what would haveoccurred if it had not passed. [syracuse.com, 8/03/11]

Voted Against Final Debt Ceiling Compromise Legislation

In August 2011, Buerkle voted against the final debt ceiling compromise legislation, the Budget ControlAct of 2011.

The framework would cut $917 billion in spending over a decade, raise the debt limit initially by $900

billion and assign a special congressional committee, with members from the House and the Senate andappointed by congressional leadership, to find another $1.5 trillion in deficit savings by late November.

If Congress met that deadline and deficit target, or voted to send a balanced budget amendment to thestates, the debt ceiling would be raised an additional $1.5 trillion. The plan guaranteed a vote on thebalanced budget amendment between October and the end of 2011.

If Congress failed to take either step, or debt savings of at least $1.2 trillion were not produced, the planallows the president to obtain a $1.2 trillion debt ceiling increase. That would trigger automatic spendingcuts across the government including in defense and Medicare to take effect starting in 2013. TheMedicare cuts would only affect provider reimbursements. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The bill was passed by the full House, 269-161. [Bloomberg, 8/01/11; S 356, 8/01/11]

Voted Against Reids Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Buerkle voted against Sen. Harry Reids plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Reids plan called for raising the debt limit by $2.4 trillion, requiring no additional debt ceiling vote untilafter the 2012 election.

The plan included $1.2 trillion in discretionary spending cuts over 10 years, mandatory spending cuts of$100 billion, $1 trillion in savings from winding down combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and$400 billion in interest savings. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The CBO score of Reids plan said it would reduce the deficit by $2.2 trillion. The bill was rejected by thefull House, 173-246. [New York Times, 7/25/11; HR 2693,7/30/11]

Buerkle: It would be Irresponsible to Just Raise the Debt Ceiling

4

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

5/34

In July 2011, Buerkle said, We cannot just raise the debt ceiling. That would be irresponsible, that wouldbe pouring gasoline on a fire. It just would be wrong to do. What we need to do, and what this bill is thatwe will vote on, this bill caps discretionary spending until 2016 at 2010 levels. [WRVO, 7/29/11]

Voted in Favor of Boehners Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Buerkle voted in favor of Speaker John Boehners plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Boehners plan called for an immediate debt ceiling raise of $900 billion, spending cuts of $917 billionover 10 years, and an additional debt ceiling vote in six months. The legislation contained no revenueincreases.

Under Boehners plan, the second debt ceiling raise was conditional on the passage of a balanced budgetamendment by both Houses of Congress and the creation of a select joint committee on deficit reduction.

The CBO score of Boehners plan said it would reduce the deficit by $850 billion. The bill was approved

by the full house, 218-210. [ABC News, 7/29/11; S 627, 7/29/11]

Buerkle: President and the Senate Should Get on Board with House

In July 2011, Buerkle said in regards to the debt ceiling negotiations, Neither the Senate nor thepresident have offered anything. Everything that you have heard has come from the House. It was theContinuing Resolution, it was the budget, last week it was Cut, Cap and Balance, and this week its thisbill here. We are trying every which way to send a reassuring message to the markets, to the Americanpeople, that we can get our fiscal house in order, and it would sure be helpful if the Senate and thepresident could get on board. [WRVO, 7/29/11]

Called on Senate to Stop Passing the Buck and Do Their Job on Debt Ceiling Issue

In July 2011, in response to warnings from Sen. Chuck Schumer on the consequences of debt default,Buerkle called on Schumer to support the Republican debt ceiling plan or offer his own proposal. TheRepublican plan passed the House with a vote of 234-190.

Buerkle said, The Gang of 234 has put their plan on the tableWe call upon Senator Schumer to cometogether with us and act swiftly to protect the families of New York from having their American dreamobliterated under the crushing debt heaped upon our kids and grandkids.

Buerkle added, The Senate needs to stop passing the buck and do their job. Senator Schumer needs to dohis job for the sake of New Yorks middle class families that are suffering from his inaction. [The Post-Standard, 7/22/11]

Voted in Favor of Cut, Cap and Balance Plan

In July 2011, Buerkle voted in favor of the Cut, Cap and Balance Act, legislation requiring deep spendingcuts, a federal spending cap and a balanced budget amendment in order to raise the federal debt ceiling.

5

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

6/34

Under Cut, Cap and Balance, discretionary spending in fiscal year 2012 would be reduced below fiscalyear 2008 levels except for Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans affairs. The plan provided auniversal spending cap after 2012. The legislation contained no revenue increases.

The bill was approved by the full House, 234-190. [New York Times, 7/21/11; HR 2560, 7/19/11]

Buerkle: The Greatest Threat to our National Security is our Debt

In June 2011, Buerkle commented, This debt, this deficit, weakens us. If you talk to the Department ofDefense or the Joint Chiefs of Staff, they will tall you that the greatest threat to our national security is ourdebt. [The Post Standard,6/30/11]

Buerkle: Protests Against Ryan Plan Based on Inaccurate Information

In June 2011, Buerkle said that protests against her vote for the Ryan Medicare reform bill were based oninaccurate information spread by Democrats looking to scare senior citizens.

Buerkle said, This is, I think, the most despicable campaign- when you prey upon seniors and theirfearsAnd they are the most vulnerable people. Even if this proposal were adopted, it wont affectanyone 55 and over. [The Post-Standard, 6/27/11]

Introduced Legislation to Cut Funding to Congressional Operating Budgets

In June 2011, Buerkle introduced the Just Do Your Job Act of 2011, which would cut off federal fundingto the House and Senate budget committees and leadership officesin any year they failed to pass abudget.

Buerkle commented, This legislation provides a solution to this dereliction of duty by cutting funding for

operations that cannot or refuse to comply with the lawEven the Libyan government, in the middle of acivil war, passed a budget in June 2011. [The Post-Standard,6/24/11]

Voted for Homeland Security Funding Cuts

In June 2011, Buerkle voted for an amendment to the Homeland Security appropriations bill that wouldexpand eligibility for Homeland Security grants. Buerkle also voted for the final passage of the bill,which cuts $1.1 billion in Homeland Security funds.

Buerkle commented, I voted to put Syracuse and other cities that were cut out of homeland security backinto the poolIt was in the best interests of my district. [Poughkeepsie Journal, 6/06/11]

Voted Against Clean Debt Ceiling Raise

In May 2011, Buerkle voted against HR 1954, a clean federal debt ceiling raise of $2.4 trillion.

The bill was rejected by the full House, 97-318. [HR 1954, 5/31/11]

Buerkle Pledged To Vote Against Clean Debt Limit Increase

6

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

7/34

In a May 2011 press release, Buerkle said, The over-spending problem must be brought under control. Iwill not vote to raise the debt limit until Congress, particularly the Senate, and the Administrationseriously address spending. [Office of Congresswoman Buerkle, 5/31/11]

Syracuse Lost Potential $1 Million In DHS Security Grants Due To Budget Cuts

In May 2011, The Post Standard reported that due to budget cutbacks, the Syracuse area will no longer beeligible for grants under the Urban Areas Security Initiative of the DHS. In 2009, the Syracuse area wasawarded more than $1 million in grants. In response to Democratic criticism, Buerkle said thatDemocrats have offered no other budget alternatives but that she would consider working to restore thefunds. [Post Standard, 5/20/11]

Buerkle Voted For Reductions In Food Assistance For New Yorkers

In May 2011, The Post Standard reported that the Ryan budget would cut $12 billion per year for the next

ten years from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by converting it from a federalprogram to block grants for each state. New Yorkers receiving aid from SNAP rose from 1.86 million in2008 to 3.15 million in 2009. Buerkle voted for the Ryan budget plan. [Post Standard, 5/17/11]

Voted for Ryan Budget, to End Medicare

On April 15, 2011, Buerkle voted for Rep. Paul Ryans budget proposal, which would end Medicare. [HCon. Res. 34, Vote #277, 4/15/11]

Buerkle: Ryan Budget is Serious and Commendable

On April 5, 2011, Buerkle showed support for Rep. Paul Ryans budget proposal.Rep. Ryans Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2012 is a serious and in-depth proposal that addresses thefiscal crisis facing this nation. Congressman Ryan and the Budget Committee have done a commendablejob in proposing a course towards fiscal responsibility. [] This budget resolution proposes to recommitthis Congress to a fiscally responsible course that will preserve the American Dream for our children andgrandchildren. [Office of Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle,4/05/11]

Called for Even Greater Budget Cuts Above $2 Billion Per Week

In a March 2011, Buerkle suggested reducing the budgetary deficit with cuts greater than those entailed inthe continuing resolution.

We voted for the two-week (continuing resolution) extension, and now we just voted for the three-weekCR extension. Each one of those extensions includes a $2 billion cut per week, but thats really notenough, because of what were spending. The interest on the debt exceeds that $2 billion cut. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Called Further Budget Cuts a Condition to Raising the Debt Ceiling

In March 2011, Buerkle stated that she was noncommittal on voting to raise the debt ceiling.

7

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

8/34

To say I would vote to raise it ... I wouldnt say that until Im satisfied with the reforms and with thesteps and the cuts that would be a reasonable and responsible raising of the debt ceiling, she said. [ThePost-Standard,3/27/11]

Supported House Budget Cuts that Would Cut Funding for Poison Control Centers

In 2011, WSYR Channel 9 News reported that a proposal was approved in the House budget bill thatwould cut more than $500,000 from the Upstate New York Poison Center. Buerkle voted for the Housebudget.

As many as 80,000 calls come in to the Upstate New York Poison Center every year. More than half ofthose calls come from the public, and just about 40 percent come from hospitals. [9wsyr.com, 3/24/11]

Opposed to High Speed Rail in Upstate New York

In 2011, Buerkle signed onto a letter with Tom Reed to urge Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood toabandon plans for a high speed rail line for New York State. [The-Leader.com, 3/24/11]

Voted to Defund NPR

In 2011, Buerkle supported to defund National Public Radio. [publicbroadcasting.net,3/18/11]

Buerkle Supported Massive Spending Cuts in GOP Budget

In February 2011, Buerkle voted in support of the GOP budget. The amendments in the budget stripfunding to implement Obamas health care reform plan, halt federal aid to Planned Parenthood, eliminatefederal funding for public broadcasting and prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency fromregulating pollution that causes global warming. Buerkle said, The government does a lot of goodthingsI dont think anyone disputes that. But we are out of money. For every dollar we spend, 42 centsis borrowed. Its just not the way we should do business. And the only way we can change that is to stopspending. [Post-Standard, 2/20/11]

Buerkle Responded to DCCC Attack on Plans to Trim Federal Budget

In January 2011, Buerkle responded to DCCC ads attacking the GOP for plans to trim the federal budget,characterizing them as hurting education and stifling the research-and-development needed to create jobs.Liza Lowrey, a spokesman for Buerkle, also emailed to object to the hysteria of the DCCC's charges.We're coming off a historic election and the American people want less government, less spending, and

less taxes. The DCCC interjecting this type of hysteria in discussions is not helpful. There needs to be afrank discussion with the American people and this congress is ready to do that. [New York Observer,1/31/11]

Buerkle Named Vice Chair of Oversight Panel on Spending, Stimulus Programs

In January 2011, Darrell Issa assigned Buerkle to a leading role on his Subcommittee on RegulatoryAffairs, Stimulus Oversight and Government Spending. The subcommittee has broad-ranging oversight of

8

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

9/34

federal spending, including education, agriculture and communications policy. Both Buerkle and Issa saythey want to work through the committee to shrink government and reduce federal spending.[Syracuse.com, 1/18/11]

Business and Consumer IssuesCriticized Proposed Agricultural Regulations

In December 2011, Buerkle sent a letter to Labor Secretary Solis regarding her concerns about farmingregulations in New York and proposed labor restrictions on non-proprietor-owned family farms.

Buerkle said, As written, several of the hazardous occupation orders will restrict anyone under the age of16 not only from working on family farms, but also from participating in important agricultural youthprograms such as 4-H and Future Farmers of AmericaThese proposed regulations will limit access andopportunities of family members under the age of 16 to gain agriculture experience and training. [Penfield

Post, 12/8/11]

Buerkle: We are Going to be Watching Warren and the CFPB Very Carefully

In July 2011, Buerkle questioned Elizabeth Warren on how the Consumer Financial Protection Bureausrules would impact businesses.

Buerkle said, My purpose in questioning Elizabeth Warren was to let her know that we are going to bewatching her and the CFPB very carefully. We will make sure that they do not create more bureaucracyand regulatory red tape to further burden our businessesThe horrific June job numbers are strongindication that this economy is not recovering. The last thing our job creators need is further government

regulation impeding growth. [auburnpub.com,7/14/11]

Campaign Finance Issues

Received Fundraising Boost from Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman

In November 2011, Buerkle received a fundraising boost from Rep. John Mica, chair of theTransportation and Infrastructure Committee.

Mica headlined a breakfast at the Genessee Grand Hotel for Buerkles re-election and then toured the

Syracuse Connective Corridor. Hosts paid $1,000 for PACS and $500 for individuals while guests paid$500 for PACS and $250 per individual. [auburnpub.com, 11/28/11]

Called on by Opponent Maffei to Return Koch Money

In October 2011, Former Rep. Maffei called on Buerkle to donate the $1,000 from Koch Industries tocharity after Bloomberg News reported that they profited from doing business with Iran.

9

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

10/34

Maffei gave the $3,500 he received from the Koch brothers PAC to the Families of Freedom ScholarshipFund. The Koch brothers have been big supporters of the Tea Part movement, which Buerkle has stronglyembraced. [capitaltonight.com, 10/18/11]

Maffei Donated Dirty Koch Money

In October 2011, Maffei donated a $3,500 Koch industries contribution to charity after reports ofthe companys business dealings with Iran.

Maffei called for Buerkle to do the same and said, In light of the recent report that KochIndustries has been doing business with Iran, I not only will never take another cent from them,but I am giving their past donations away to charity. [Politico, 10/18/11]

Maffei Wanted Buerkle to Donate Koch Money To Charity

In October 2011, Maffei donated a $3,500 Koch industries contribution to charity after reports ofthe companys business dealings with Iran.

Maffei called for Buerkle to do the same and said, In light of the recent report that KochIndustries has been doing business with Iran, I not only will never take another cent from them,but I am giving their past donations away to charity. [auburnpub.com,10/18/11]

Opponent Maffei Had More Cash on Hand After Q3

In October 2011, former Rep. Maffei reported having $287,774 compared to Buerkles $247,089.

Buerkles district could lose its seat when New York makes final redistricting plans. [capitaltonight.com,10/17/11]

Maffei Rose Ahead of Buerkle in Fundraising

In October 2011, former Rep. Maffei had more cash on hand than Buerkle, who has been markedas a below-average fundraiser.

Buerkle made 6th place on National Journals list of Top 10 House fundraising Flops. Aspokeswoman for Buerkle said, Fundraising is always an issue. But her priority has been, andwill continue to be, the people of the district and doing the work in Washington. [Syracuse.com,10/17/11]

Received $1,000 From Family Research Council PAC

Buerkle received $1,000 from Family Research Council Action PAC on August 8, 2011.[Ann Marie Buerklefor Congress, 2011 October Quarterly FEC Report, Filed 10/14/11]

Made In-Kind Donation of Commercial Cookware and Basket

On September 25, 2011, Buerkle made an in-kind donation of commercial cookware and basket, valuedat $465, to Victor Job. [Ann Marie Buerkle for Congress, 2011 October Quarterly FEC Report, Filed 10/14/11]

10

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

11/34

Reported Stronger Fundraising Numbers for Second Quarter

In July 201l, CapitolTonight.com reported Buerkles fundraising showing for the second quarter wasconsiderably stronger than her first-quarter numbers. In April, she reported taking just $65,150 in netcontributions much of which ($54,000) came from Washington, DC-based PACs. At the time, Buerkles

staff said she was taking a break from fundraising to focus on her job as a freshman member of the House.Buerkle raised a total of $121,493 in the second quarter. [capitoltonight.com, 7/15/11]

Fundraising Totals Lower than Predecessor

In July 2011, Auburnpub.com reported Buerkles fundraising totals are lower than those offormer Rep. Dan Maffei in his first two fundraising quarters as a member of Congress. MaffeisJuly 2009 filing shows he raised nearly $380,000 in the quarter, and at that point, had raisedapproximately $890,000 for the cycle. [auburnpub.com, 7/15/11]

Reported Campaign Contributions from Sarah Palin

In July 2011, Buerkle reported $1,000 in campaign contributions from Citizens United, $5,000 from theRepublican Mainstreet PAC, and $5,000 from Sarah Palins PAC. [Ann Marie Buerkle for Congress, 2011 JulyQuarterly FEC Report, filed 7/13/11]

Crime & Public Safety Issues

Called for Holders Resignation over Fast and Furious Program

In November 2011, Buerkle, along with 41 other members of Congress, called for Eric Holders

resignation over the Fast and Furious gun-running program.

Buerkle said, Today, I stand with over 40 other Members of the United States Congress in calling for theresignation of United States Attorney General Eric Holder. He has failed to uphold the duties of the officeof United States Attorney General and has lost public confidence. The botched Operation Fast andFurious has harmed U.S. and Mexico cross-border relationsThe administrations failure to coordinateits efforts in combating weapons trafficking has been a glaring omission in one of our countrys greatestnational security interests. It is likely to lead to a rift in the bilateral relationship with one of our closesttrading partners. [dailycaller.com,11/15/11]

Called for Holders Resignation over Fast and Furious Program

In November 2011, Buerkle called for Eric Holders resignation over the Fast and Furious gun-running program.

Buerkle said, His actions throughout his time as attorney general have led to questions of hiscompetence and truthfulness. The evidence obtained through congressional hearings on OperationFast and Furious indicates that he allowed for an estimated 1,800 guns to walk into the hands of

11

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

12/34

Mexican drug cartels. These same guns have been linked to the deaths of an estimated 300 people,including two U.S. Border Patrol Agents. [syracuse.com,11/15/11]

Said Holders Actions Illustrated a Disregard to the United States Constitution

In November 2011, Buerkle called for Holders resignation over the Fast and Furious programand said that his actions illustrated a disregard to the United States Constitution.

Buerkle said, Attorney General Holders actions have illustrated a disregard to the United StatesConstitution. The 2nd amendment is a sacred right of individuals and, unfortunately, its integrityhas been undermined by the Attorney General. The Office of the U.S. Attorney General is taskedwith upholding and protecting our Constitution. The U.S. government is responsible to theAmerican people to hold Eric Holder accountable for his failure to properly carry out the duties ofthis office. [capitaltonight.com,11/16/11]

Economic and Financial IssuesOpposed Gillibrands Upstate Works Act

In December 2011, Buerkle said she opposed Sen. Kirsten Gillibrands five-part plan, the Upstate WorksAct, which would provide federal tax credits, loans and grants to stimulate economic growth.[poughkeepsiejournal.com, 1/03/12]

Helped Secure $10.2 Million Grant for Syracuse University

In January 2012, Buerkle told constituents about her work securing federal funding for projects in the

district, and lauded a recent project at Syracuse University.

We were instrumental in getting the $10.2 million grant for Syracuse University and the Near West SideInitiative and I think that is really going to help this area. Help connect Syracuse University with this areaand really improve the quality of life on the near West Side, Buerkle said. [ynn.com, 1/06/12]

Voted Against Obamas Request to Raise the Debt Limit

In January 2012, Buerkle expressed her disapproval of Obamas request to raise the debt limit.

We have an obligation to our creditors to pay our debt, but also have an obligation to the American

people to live within our means, Buerkle. Continuing to raise the debt limit without correspondingfiscal restraint is irresponsible and will burden future generations with our spending problem. [PenfieldPost, 1/19/12]

Voted for REINS Act

12

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

13/34

In December 2011, Buerkle voted for the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS)Act, which would require Federal agencies to submit regulations with an annual economic impact of $100million or greater to Congress for approval. The bill passed the House by a vote of 241-184.

Buerkle said that the act would put accountability in the hands of the people's elected representatives,

rather than unelected agency officials. Regulation promoted by government agencies place tremendousburdens on businesses and industries, and hinder job creation. She also said that regulations are ill-considered and unnecessary [and] stifle American innovation and leave the economy stagnant. Inaddition, she said the Act would guarantee accountability and transparency in the regulatory process, andensure that we are working to support our job creators, not standing in their way. [Irondequoit Post, 12/10/11]

Said Both Parties Need to Let Private Sector Create Jobs

In November 2011, Buerkle said that both parties needed to let the private sector create jobs, or else voterfrustration would continue to rise.

Buerkle said, I think the economy and jobs is on everybody's mind. And rather than attacking thoseproblems, there's all this partisan bickering going on and I think that's the frustration you hear withpeople. We've got to go something to get this economy going, we've got to put a pro-growth economicagenda in place. [cnycentral.com,11/22/11]

Blamed Democrats for High Unemployment Rate

In November 2011, Buerkle blamed Democrats for the 9 percent unemployment rate.

Buerkle said, With more than 14 million workers unemployed, we must do everything possible toremove barriers to job growth and investment in the American economy. Since January, the House haspassed 17 job creation bills that will motivate the private sector to create jobs. These bills are sitting in theSenate, where Senate leadership refuses to take action on them. Its time for the Senate to stop weighingdown our economy and delaying job growth. It is time for the Senate to take up these bills and showAmerica where it stands on getting our nation back to work. [mpnnow.com, 11/06/11]

Claimed that Stimulus Package Has Not Reduced Unemployment

In March 2011, Buerkle said that the stimulus package did not create jobs.

Weve spent close to a trillion dollars, with $800 billion for the stimulus plan and it cost us $300 billionon interest to borrow that money. Unemployment didnt go down. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Some of the Projects Were Good

In March 2011, Buerkle claimed that some of the jobs created by the stimulus package were good.

Some of the projects were good, it wasnt all bad, but thats a different philosophy. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

13

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

14/34

Education Issues

Cosponsored Legislation Advocating School Vouchers in the DC Area

In 2011, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, on which Buerkle was a member,

debated the Scholarships for Opportunity and Results Act (SOAR). SOAR encouraged Washington, DCfamilies to choose the schools that are the best fit for their children through a school voucher system.

Buerkle, a co-sponsor of SOAR, voted to advance the bill out of Committee for consideration by the fullHouse of Representatives. [Buerkle Bulletin,03/14/11]

Voted to Support School-Voucher System in Washington D.C.

In 2011, Buerkle voted in support of a program to re-enact the District of Columbia's school-vouchersystem.

A rising tide lifts all boats. School choice means competition. Just like any free market, competitiondrives improvement in quality. The parents and students in our nation's capital deserve a qualityeducation. The SOAR Act not only reauthorizes the Opportunity Scholarships and allows new students toapply; it also provides money for public charter schools and public school improvements in the District ofColumbia. [The Independent Womens Forum, 4/01/11]

Claimed School Voucher Program Doesnt Spend Any New Money

In 2011, Buerkle claimed that the DC voucher program doesnt spend any additional money.

The act does not spend any new money; it reauthorizes and reallocates existing funding to allow

the Opportunity Scholarship program to continue. It is important we take proven successes like theOpportunity Scholarships and keep them going. [The Independent Womens Forum,4/01/11]

Energy Issues

Opposed Obamas Rejection of Keystone Pipeline

In January 2012, Buerkle expressed her disapproval of Obamas rejection of the Keystone Pipeline.

I am extremely disappointed that President Obama decided to reject the Keystone XL pipeline. Thepipeline provided an excellent opportunity for the President to show the American people he is seriousabout creating jobs and moving the United States toward energy independence, Buerkle said. What thiscountry needs are job creating initiatives as well as an energy policy that reduces our dependence on oilfrom the Middle East. The President had an opportunity to address both issues and he failed to do so.[auburnpub.com,1/20/12]

Buerkle: Principle Behind BULB Act is What is Important

14

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

15/34

In July 2011, Buerkle said industry support for regulations governing light bulb efficiency didnt matteras much as the principle behind the BULB Act, legislation repealing those regulations. Buerkle was oneof the 20 original co-sponsors of the BULB Act.

Buerkle said, The underlying theme here is that I dont believe the government should be in the business

of picking winners and losersLet the market decide. [The Post-Standard,7/13/11]

Buerkle Supported Restarting Off-Shore Drilling.

In May 2011, Congressional Documents and Publications reported that Buerkle commented, PresidentObamas ongoing freeze on offshore drilling in the U.S. is increasing our nations dependence on unstableforeign energy suppliersThe focus in the House this week has been on increasing oil production tobring down fuel costs and to increase jobs. [Congressional Documents and Publications, 5/12/11]

Buerkle: If An Energy Initiative Is Valid, The Market Will Support It

According to The Post Standard, in April 2011, at a town hall meeting, Buerkle, spoke againstgovernment incentives to develop renewable energy resources like solar power. If an energy initiative isvalid, the market will support it, she said. [The Post Standard, 4/28/11]

Buerkle Sought to End Government Regulation of Light Bulbs

In February 2011 Buerkle made evident her intention to end government regulation of light bulbs. Thecurrent regulation as it stands mandates that incandescent bulbs be phased out in favor of more efficientCFL bulbs by 2012. Buerkle said, It goes back to the fundamental question of, What is going to succeedin the market? The government should not be mandating the use of one light bulb or the otherLet themarket decide. She signed onto The BULB (Better Use of Lightbulbs) Act, which would endgovernment regulation concerning types of light bulbs available to consumers. [Syracuse.com, 2/8/11]

Environmental Issues

Dodged Question on Climate Change

In June 2011, in response to questions about her stance on climate change, Buerkle stated that she had anadvisory council on energy and the environment. When called out for not directly answering the question,Buerkle commented that she was very aware of climate change but declined any other further response.[Eagle Observer, 7/04/11]

Would Not Commit To Transferring Onondaga Lake Cleanup to Local Stakeholder

By April 2011, Buerkle had yet to commit to sponsoring legislation that would transfer management ofthe $1.1 billion Onondaga Lake cleanup from the Army Corps of Engineers to a group of local scientistsand stakeholders.

15

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

16/34

Legislation that would transfer control to local stakeholders had been previously sponsored by DanMaffei, a Democrat, as well as James Walsh, a Republican. [syracuse.com, 4/08/11]

Ethics Issues

Sold Controversial Shopping Plaza in Camilus

In November 2011, Buerkle sold a Camilus shopping center that had been a campaign issue due todelinquent taxes for $1.96 million.

Buerkles 2010 opponent Dan Maffei accused her of owing about $30,000 in county taxes on the propertyBuerkle said she sold the properties because they required too much of her time. She said that proceedsfrom the sale would not be used to pay campaign debts, but did not say her plans with the money.

It was not revealed who the buyer was at the time of sale. [syracuse.com,12/11/11]

Buerkle Missed First Vote to Pose for Photo With Boehner

In January 2011, following her swearing in ceremony, Ann Marie Buerkle missed her first House vote topose for a photo with newly-elected Speaker John Boehner. According to Syracuse.com, By leaving theHouse floor, Buerkle missed the first vote on a resolution by the 112th Congress and her first as a memberof the House of Representatives. [Syracuse.com, 1/05/11]

Foreign Policy Issues Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea

Said the President Should Not Have Blank Check for Libya

In July 2011, Buerkle voted to restrict funds for military operations in Libya. Buerkle said, The power ofthe purse plays an important part in the US government's system of checks and balances...The Presidentshould not have a blank check to conduct wars without the consultation and authorization of Congress.[auburnpub.com,7/11/11]

Supported Cuts to U.S. Foreign Aid

In 2011, Buerkle supported U.S. cuts to foreign aid, saying that America couldnt justify supportingother nations.

"How do we justify spending this money in other countries, and not having it available for the Americanpeople," she asked. [voanwes.com, 3/15/11]

Criticized Obama for Not Following the Appropriate Process in Bombing Libya

In March 2011, Buerkle claimed that the president did not follow the appropriate process in going intoLibya.

16

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

17/34

I dont think the president followed the appropriate process. He should have come to Congress and heshould have come to the American people, she said. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Questioned the U.S. Goal in Bombing Libya

Buerkle questioned the mission of the US military in Libya.

What is our mission there? The president has said its time for Gadhafi to go. But if werecomplying with a U.N. resolution, and thats what he used as his justification to go in there and tosend in the missiles, its humanitarian, its to protect the people from being slaughtered. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Gay and Lesbian Issues

Honored by GOP Gay Rights Group

In February 2012, the Log Cabin Republicans, a national GOP organization dedicated to representing theinterests of gays and lesbians, honored Buerkle and three other House Republicans at the annualConservative Political Action Conference. [syracuse.com,2/07/12]

Gun Issues

Buerkle Did Not Believe in Restricting Gun Rights

In February 2011, Buerkle was asked about restricting gun rights following the shooting of Rep. Giffords.Buerkle said she did not support any restrictions on gun rights, and that the shooter was mentally ill andwould have gotten a gun one way or another. Its a fact that Americans have the right to bear arms, shesaid. [The Post-Standard, 2/03/11]

Health Care Issues

Introduced Help Our Hospitals Act of 2011

In December 2011, Buerkle introduced the Help Our Hospitals Act of 2011 that would repeal a section of

the Affordable Health Care Act that cut Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital payments to hospitals.

Buerkle said, This legislation is a step in the right direction in the fight to repeal the onerous provisionsin the Presidents Health Care Law. The Presidents call for DSH payment cuts of this nature ignores theneeds of low income patients and is dangerous to our hospitals economic stability. [Gates Chili Post,12/15/11]

Received Award from RetireSafe, Attacked by DCCC

17

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

18/34

In December 2011, RetireSafe gave Buerkle the Standing Up For Americas Seniors award for her workto protect seniors' health care benefits by ensuring access to affordable medications through MedicarePart D and opposing proposals that threaten to limit access to health care and increase premiums forseniors in the Medicare program.

Jesse Ferguson from the DCCC said, Representative Ann Marie Buerkle voted to end Medicare andnearly double health care costs for seniors and there is no special interest group that can pull the woolover New York seniors' eyes about it. The only award that Representative Ann Marie Buerkle deserves isone for being the favorite of corporate special interests and leaving New York seniors out in the cold.[auburnpub.com,12/7/11]

Health Care Law Would Disrupt Medicare

On June 28, 2011, Buerkle told a town hall audience in Manlius that the 2010 health care reform lawwould disrupt Medicare and indicated that the Ryan plan was necessary to save the program.

Now the one thing youre not hearing is that the health care lawdisrupts Medicare as we know it Itis very important, the health care law disrupts Medicare. It cuts Medicare by $500 billion and it alsocreated the independent advisory board- 15 bureaucrats, appointed not elected officials, who will makethe health care decisions for Medicare recipients, Buerkle said.

If we dont put plans out, if we dont come to the table, there isnt going to be Medicare. Paul Ryansproposal does not change Medicare for anyone that is 55 and above. [Manlius Town Hall,6/28/11]

Buerkle: Protests Against Republican Medicare Reform Based on Inaccurate Information

In June 2011, Buerkle said that protests against her vote for the Ryan Medicare reform bill were based on

inaccurate information spread by Democrats looking to scare senior citizens.

Buerkle said, This is, I think, the most despicable campaign- when you prey upon seniors and theirfearsAnd they are the most vulnerable people. Even if this proposal were adopted, it wont affectanyone 55 and over. [The Syracuse Post-Standard, 6/27/11]

Claimed that Health Care Reform Ignored the Big Problems

In March 2011, Buerkle claimed that Health Care Reform ignored the big problems.

The health care system in this country is broken. And picking at some of these things treats the

symptoms rather than the big problems, she said. [The Post-Standard,3/27/11]

Buerkle Did Not Know Government Paid for Congressional Healthcare

During a February 2011 town hall meeting, Buerkle was confused about the controversy over acceptingcongressional healthcare and taxpayers were not paying for it. Then after being handed a note from astaffer, she changed her statement. Just like most employees, she pays part and then her employer, thegovernment, pays the rest. [TPMDC, 2/4/11]

18

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

19/34

Buerkle Unaware She Received Government Healthcare Plan

In February 2011, Buerkle denied that she received health care that was paid for by taxpayers. Accordingto the Post-Standard, during a town hall meeting, Buerkle, who voted to repeal the health care reformact, was twice asked about the health insurance she receives as a government employee. At first she saidshe couldnt understand why people were so interested in her health insurance, and that taxpayers didntpay anything for it. She later corrected herself after being handed a note from a staffer. Like mostemployees, she pays for a portion of her insurance and her employer, the government, pays the rest, shesaid. [The Post-Standard, 2/3/11]

Buerkle Would Not Cut Medicaid

In February 2011, Buerkle was asked by parents of a disabled child whether she supported potential cutsto Medicaid. Buerkle said she doesnt support cutting services for people like the the couples son.Theres a legitimate role of government in some places, she said. [The Post-Standard, 2/3/11]

Immigration and Border Issues

Israel

Buerkle Said Obamas Support Of Israel Rang Hollow

In May 2011, Rep. Buerkles office released a statement on President Obamas speech on the Middle Eastcommenting, President Obama's words of support for Israel ring hollow when considering the context of

his remarks. In his speech, he continued a long and unsavory tradition of many American liberals byimplying moral equivalence between the Israeli government and the Hamas-led Palestinian government.[Office of Congresswoman Buerkle, 5/20/11]

Labor and Working Family Issues

Buerkle: We Cant Afford to Lose 174th Fighter Wing

In January 2012, Buerkle said she would fight to keep the 174th Fighter Wing base in her district.

The base employs in the district more than 1,500 people and the annual economic impact is somewherearound $96 million. We can't afford to lose it. It doesn't make sense to lose it, Buerkle said. [9wsyr.com,1/27/12]

Led Agricultural Task Force

19

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

20/34

In December 2011, Buerkle announced that she would lead an agricultural task force to confront issuesthat impede food production. She planned to meet with a collective of farmers to discuss concerns andissues that impact district farms.

Buerkle expressed concern in a letter to U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis about the unintended

consequences of limiting access to valuable agricultural experience and training.

Family farms are a proud tradition in New York state and are essential in training a new generation tocarry on the important work of farming, Buerkle said. [auburnpub.com,1/03/12]

Lone New Yorker Against Job-Training Program

In October 2011, Buerkle was the only member of New Yorks 29-member delegation to vote againstextending a program that would retrain workers who lost their jobs due to international competition.

The trade adjustment assistance bill would provide job training and other aid to 8,590 New Yorkers who

lost their jobs in FY2010. The bill passed with bipartisan support. Conservative lobbying groups calledthe program wasteful and a spokeswoman for Buerkle said, I think there was some disagreement over theeffectiveness of the program and whether it was duplicating existing programs. And what about workerswho lost their jobs due to reasons other than trade? [Syracuse.com, 10/18/11]

National Security Issues

Named Defense Authorization Act Conferee

In December 2011, Buerkle was appointed by Boehner to serve as a conference committee member on the

FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act.

Buerkle said, I am pleased to have been selected by Speaker Boehner to serve as a conferee for theNational Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2012. As a conferee I will have the opportunity toadvocate for defense-related initiatives that are essential to protecting our country and supporting our menand women in uniform. I look forward to working with my House and Senate colleagues to pass a fiscallyresponsible bill that meets the needs of our military and its personnel. [Penfield Post,12/12/11]

Buerkle Voted For Patriot Act Provisions

In February 2011, Buerkle voted to extend certain provisions of the Patriot Act. Buerkle said, The three

provisions that are due to expire on February 28th continue to give law enforcement personnel the criticaltools necessary to fight terrorism in a cyber-dominated world. The purpose of this 10-month extension isto allow the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees time to fully debate potential changes andexercise proper oversight and consideration.As Vice Chair of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee onTerrorism, Nonproliferation and Trade, I look forward to working aggressively to address issues thatthreaten our national security and keep terrorist activities and terrorist access to weapons of massdestruction at bay.[AuburnPub.com, 2/15/11]

20

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

21/34

Other Social Issues

Attended Anti-Abortion Rally

In January 2012, Buerkle spoke at the 39th Annual March For Life, where she called the attendeesheroes and thanked them for leading the fight for the right to life.

Ladies and gentleman, every life, regardless of the circumstance, has intrinsic value because it wascreated by God, Buerkle said. We know that. We now need to convince the rest of the country.[CSPAN, 01:16:03,1/23/12]

Had No Idea On Debate to Make School Food Healthier

In November 2011, Buerkle admitted to having no idea about the debate over the Obama administrationsefforts to make school food healthier.

Buerkle was one of two New York Republicans to vote no on a bill that called 1/8 cups of tomato pastea serving of vegetables. [capitaltonight.com,11/21/11]

Stated that Entitlement Reform May Affect Individuals Younger than 55

In March 2011, Buerkle stated that entitlement reform may affect individuals 55 and younger.

When questioned during an interview about a possible age for social security and Medicare cuts, Buerklesaid she heard maybe 55 and younger, that being where the discussion starts. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Claimed that Seniors Wont be Affected by Entitlement Reform

In 2011, Buerkle moved to reassure seniors that they would not be affected by entitlement reform.The thing we have to do, if youre talking about Social Security, is to reassure seniors that thisisnt going to affect them. We have a contract with our seniors and its very important that wedont alarm them. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

Stem Cells

Tax Issues

Denounced Payroll Tax Holiday

In December 2011, Buerkle labeled the payroll tax proposal as an insult to the American people duringa news conference with many Republican House members. [Democrat and Chronicle,12/22/12]

21

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

22/34

Signed Letter to Encourage Leadership to Act on Repatriation

In December 2011, Buerkle signed a letter to GOP leadership to act on repatriation of overseas capital.

The letter said, Estimates have shown that at least $1.4 trillion in foreign earnings are kept overseasbecause of the uncompetitive tax policies here in the U.S. Unlocking this capital has the possibility ofcreating over 2.9 million new jobs, and increasing GDP by nearly $360 billionAs negotiations continuewith the White House and Congressional Democrats on a number of expiring tax provisions,appropriation bills and comprehensive tax reform, we strongly urge you to consider repatriation taxpolicy, this session, to stimulate the economy and get Americans back to work. [Frank Guinta Press Release,12/06/11]

Supported Smaller Government, Flattening Tax Code in Town Hall

In September 2011, Buerkle called for reducing government at town hall, calling for less involvement insmall businesses.

When asked about taxation, Buerkle supported a reduction in corporate taxes and called for a flattening ofthe tax code. She said, I think the rich should pay their fair share. We have a tax code that allows thewealthiest to hire accountants and lawyers to find the loopholes to get tax breaks. [Irondequoit Post,09/01/11]

Buerkle Wont Vote to Raise Taxes

On June 28, 2011, Buerkle told a town hall audience in Manlius that she would not vote to raise any taxes.I believe right now at this point and I know personally I will not vote to raise taxes on the Americanpeople. [Manlius Town Hall, 6/28/11]

Cutting Corporate Tax Rate Would Help U.S. Get Fiscal House in Order

In March 2011, Buerkle recommended that the US reduce the corporate tax rate as a way to encouragebusinesses to stay in the United States.

But we also need to reduce corporate taxes in this country. We are second (to Japan) in our corporate rate... Weve got to do things that are going to entice businesses to stay here, and work with them, and createcertainty and not regulate them to death and not tax them to death. ... Weve got to get our fiscal house inorder. [The Post-Standard,3/27/11]

Claimed Corporations Were Being Regulated to Death

In 2011, Buerkle said that part of the problem with keeping businesses in the United States wasburdensome regulations.

Weve got to do things that are going to entice businesses to stay here,and work with them, andcreate certainty and not regulate them to death and not tax them to death. [The Post-Standard, 3/27/11]

22

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

23/34

Buerkle: Why Do We Want to Punish the Rich? They Worked Hard for Their Money?

In 2011, during a town hall meeting, Buerkle questioned why there was the notion of class warfare inAmerica.

The middle class is being screwed, she said. But theyre not being hurt by the wealthy. They are beinghurt by the federal governmentWhy do we have class warfare? she added. Why do we want to punishthe rich? They worked hard for their money. [Syracuse.com,3/23/11]

Tea Party

Transportation Issues

Lobbied for TIGER Grants for Local Project

In December 2011, Syracuse received a $10 million TIGER grant to fund the next two phases of theSyracuse Connective Corridor project. The Post-Standard reported that Buerkle had advocated for thefunding with federal transportation officials including Rep. John Mica, Republican chairman of theHouse Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. [Post-Standard, 12/12/11]

Voted to Cut $1.3 Billion of Funding for TIGER Grants

In February 2011, Buerkle voted for a bill that would cut $1.28 billion in funding for TIGERgrants from the Department of Transportations budget including $650 million throughtermination of the program and $630 million through rescissions of previously appropriatedfunding. [H.R. 1,Vote #147, 2/19/11; House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, accessed 12/14/11]

New York Would Have Lost $28.6 Million in Funding, 11,800 Jobs

Buerkles vote to terminate the TIGER grant program would have cost New York $28,600,171 inlost funding for transportation projects and 11,803 jobs. [House Committee on Transportation andInfrastructure, 2/15/11]

Womens Issues

Praised by Susan B. Anthony List President

In February 2012, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, praised Buerkle for hersupport of pro-life legislation.

Congresswoman Buerkle has co-sponsored and advocated for nearly every pro-life bill in Congressincluding the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, the Protect Life Act, the Abortion

23

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

24/34

Nondiscrimination Act, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act and the Child Interstate AbortionNotification Act, Dannenfelser said. [humanevents.com,2/02/12]

Received Honors from Susan B. Anthony List

In February 2012, Buerkle received the Distinguished Leader Award from the Susan B. Anthony list.

Buerkle also praised those who attended the event. You support women in a crisis pregnancy and thecrisis pregnancy centers. You help them and you help support their unborn children and once the babiesare born, she said. You are the heroes. [cbn.com,2/02/12]

Attended Anti-Abortion Rally

In January 2012, Buerkle spoke at the 39th Annual March For Life, where she called the attendeesheroes and thanked them for leading the fight for the right to life.

Ladies and gentleman, every life, regardless of the circumstance, has intrinsic value because it wascreated by God, Buerkle said. We know that. We now need to convince the rest of the country.[CSPAN, 01:16:03,1/23/12]

Criticized HHS Policy to Exclude Pro-Life Groups from Trafficking

In December 2011, Buerkle criticized an HHS policy that would exclude pro-life groups from receivingfederal grants for trafficking victims.

Buerkle said, Now we are going to ask 12-year-olds to make life-changing decisions. You dont knowthe trauma of abortion. This will only add to the trauma already experienced by the victims.[nationalrighttolifenews.org,12/07/11]

Called a Chump by Planned Parenthood

In November 2011, Planned Parenthood called Buerkle, a long-time supporter of anti-abortion rights, andsaid, The 2010 election ushered in a new crop of legislators opposed to womens health. Of those, feware more dangerous and extreme than Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (R-NY). [Watertown Daily Times, 11/10/11]

Said That Democrats Would Have Defunded the Military Before Planned Parenthood

In October 2011, Buerkle during a speech at the Values Vote Summit said that Democrats would havedefunded the military before Planned Parenthood.

Buerkle said, in the CR debate, what astounded me about the continuing resolution debate early inMarch, was that the White House and the Democrats drew the line in the sand about defunding PlannedParenthood. They would have defunded our military before they defunded Planned Parenthood. That isthe titanic struggle were up against. The two different visions for this nation. [C-SPAN, 10/07/11]

Voted in Committee to Defund UN Population Control

24

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

25/34

In October 2011, Buerkle during a speech at the Values Vote Summit spoke about her vote in the ForeignAffairs Committee to defund the UN Population Control $50 million.

Buerkle said, We are up against a titanic struggle right here and now. Last week in our Foreign AffairsCommittee, we voted to defund the UN Population Control, the $50 million. And if you could hear the

arguments on the other side, you would have a sense of, and you all know this from what you hear, asense of what were up against. [C-SPAN, 10/7/11]

Believed that Planned Parenthood is Both an Ideological and Budgetary Issue

In March 2011, Buerkle said that defending entities like Planned Parenthood and NPR was both anideological and a budgetary issue.

I think its a combination of both. Whether or not someone favors abortion, or is in favor of choice, themajority of Americans dont want their tax dollars to subsidize abortion. Thats what was argued whenPlanned Parenthood gets $300 million plus a year in funding. The inability to clearly articulate whatsTitle X and whats used for abortion ... Money is fungible. [The Post-Standard,3/27/11]

Voted to Defund Planned Parenthood

In 2011, Buerkle voted to defund Planned Parenthood. [mpnnow.com,03/14/11]

Mes senger Post : Buerkle Tried to [Turn] Back the Clock By Cutting Planned Parenthood

In March 2011, the Messenger Post editorial board criticized Buerkles claim that her vote to eliminatefederal funding was not motivated by ideology.

If theres anything that makes the House Republicans budget cutting appear to be driven more byideology than fiscal prudence, its the provision taking all federal funding some $330 million awayfrom Planned Parenthood, the board wrote. This budget cut has very little to do with saving money. It ispart of the larger goal of turning back the clock, not just on abortion, but on birth control and access toreproductive health services that have saved or improved countless lives. And Rep. Buerkle shouldntsound so shocked when that fact is pointed out. [Messenger Post, 3/14/11]

Buerkle Co-Sponsored Anti-Abortion Bill

In January 2011, Buerkle co-sponsored H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act. The billwould permanently ban federal subsidies for abortion services, and also cut off federal subsidies and tax

credits for any health insurance plans that include coverage of abortions. On the same day, she co-sponsored another bill that would rewrite President Barack Obamas health care reform law to prohibitfederal subsidies for abortion services. [The Post-Standard, 1/23/11]

Buerkle Planned to Speak to Anti-Abortion Rally on the National Mall

25

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

26/34

In January 2011, Buerkle planned to speak to the March for Life rally. The annual event commemoratesthe anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a woman's right tochoose an abortion. [The Post-Standard, 1/23/11]

Buerkle Said Health Care Bill Uses Taxpayer Funds for Abortions

In January 2011, Buerkle said, For over 30 years, the Democrats and Republicans have worked togethereach year to ensure that taxpayer dollars do not subsidize abortion. The Affordable Care Act represents adeparture from that compact. Specifically, this law will allow $11 billion in taxpayer funds to be used forabortions at community health centers. [The Post-Standard, 1/23/11]

Veterans Issues

House Passed Buerkles Veterans Assault Bill

In October 2011, Buerkle had her first bill, the Veterans Sexual Assault Prevention and Health CareEnhancement Act, pass through with such widespread support that it did not require a roll call vote.

The bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to develop a policy for reporting and trackingsexual assaults and other safety incidents at VA medical facilities. [Syracuse.com, 10/11/11]

Introduced Legislation to Address Sexual Assault in VA Facilities

In June 2011, Buerkle co-sponsored legislation that would require the VA to track all sexual assaults andbetter assess those at risk of committing crimes. From January 2007 to last July, there were 284 cases ofalleged, attempted or confirmed sex assaults at Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities.

Buerkle commented, Its just inexcusable in veterans hospitals what is going onIts got to be stopped.Its got to be addressed right now. [USA Today,6/8/11]

Buerkle Supported Increasing COLA For Veterans Benefits

In a May 2011 press release, Buerkle announced her support of an increase in disabled veterans cost ofliving allowances. Buerkle commented, This is the right thing to do for our veterans. This legislationwill help to alleviate some of the financial strain on these families as we experience a significant rise ingas and food prices. [Office of Congresswoman Buerkle, 5/3/11]

Miscellaneous

Rebuked by Holder for Criticism

In February 2012, Buerkle criticized Attorney General Eric Holder during a hearing on the failed Fast andFurious gun-walking operation and was subsequently rebuked.

26

8/4/2019 Ann Marie Buerkle Clipbook

27/34

How many more Border Patrol agents would have had to die as part of Operation Fast and Furious foryou to take responsibility? Buerkle asked.

Holder responded that such a question was beneath a member of Congress.

As a member of Congress, I mean, really, is that the way in which you want to be seen, you want to beknown? Holder said. [Politico, 2/02/12]

Accused of Not Being Conservative Enough

In February 2012, Spencer accused Buerkle of not being conservative enough.

Maybe in New York Ann Marie seems conservative, but a New York conservative sort of isnt reallywhat I think most Americans would find to be conservative, Spencer said.

Shes a lawyer, and any lawyer tells you that you should read the whole contract. I cant believe she readthe whole bill when it came to NDAA. Im not even sure it would have been possible. But when you signa provision that leaves something up in the air as what is a terrorist and then go on to say any terrorist canbe picked up even if theyre an American citizen by the president, held without trial, no hearing, justpick em off and you can end up in Gitmo, thats not constitutional government. Thats not reallyconservative. [capitaltonight.com,2/08/12]

Returned Personal Office Money to Treasury

In September 2011, Buerkle reported that she expected to return about 10 percent of her office budget tothe Treasury. She spent 59.6 percent of her $1,404,731 budget as of September 30. [lohud.com,12/22/11].

Did Not Give Staffers Year-End Bonuses

In January 2012, Buerkle opted not to reward her staff with year-end bonuses.

Its consistent with us asking the American people to just tighten their