Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado Jeff Lukas - [email protected]Western Water Assessment CIRES, University of 38 th Annual Colorado Water Workshop Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, CO July 17, 2013 2013
24
Embed
Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado Jeff Lukas - [email protected] Western Water Assessment CIRES, University.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – average year
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 40 MAF
ET : -30 MAF
Runoff: 10 MAF
(MAF = million acre-feet)
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – drought year
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 30 MAF
ET : -24 MAF
Runoff: 6 MAF
While precipitation declines only 25% vs. average year, runoff declines 40% due to ET component increasing as proportion of precipitation
(MAF = million acre-feet)
Using tree rings to reconstruct past droughts
Douglas-fir, south San Juans, CO
1977 1983
Tree growth is typically limited by moisture availability
So:– a dry year leads to a narrow growth ring– a wet year leads to a wide growth ring
Ancient trees and wood are abundant across western Colorado
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
An
nu
al F
low
, MA
F
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005
2002
1977, 2002: in the lowest 10 reconstructed annual flows since 762
Meko et al. 2007. Medieval Drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Geophysical Research Letters; data available at http://treeflow.info
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005, with 20-year running mean
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
Water Year
An
nu
al F
low
, M
AF
Instrumental record
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005, with 20-year running mean
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
Water Year
An
nu
al F
low
, M
AF
0
5
10
15
20
25
1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180
Ann
ual f
low
, MA
F
Mid-1100s megadrought
46 of 57 years were dry
Future projections from global climate models
Jan. 2070
Temperatures – Going up!
Source: Marty Hoerling, NOAA ESRL PSD; data available from http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/
1950 2000 2050 2100
50°F
60°F
Western Colorado annual temperatures - ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions scenario
Observed temp.
+4ºF by 2050
1950 2000 2050 2100
32”
16”
Western Colorado annual precipitation – ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions
Precipitation – Up? Down?
Observed precip.
Source: Marty Hoerling, NOAA ESRL PSD
Runoff – Probably down, but continued high variability!
Observed runoff
Data: http://gis.usbr.gov/Streamflow_Projections/
0
10
20
30
40
50
1950 2000 2050 2100
Annu
al R
unoff
, MAF
Upper Colorado River Basin annual runoff – ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – average year, median 2050 projection (+4oF, no precip change)
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 40 MAF
ET : -31 MAF
Runoff: 9 MAF
Even though precipitation doesn’t change, runoff declines ~10% to 9 MAF due to increasing ET
+
-
Projections for Western Colorado from all GCM runs used in the most recent studies
Source: Denver Water & Joint Front Range Climate Change Vulnerability Study, as printed in Kerr, Science, 25 Nov 2011
More runoff
Less runoff
Median 2050
The “new normal” in a (yet) warmer climate
• Increased evaporation and transpiration• More rain and less snow in fall and spring• Reduced spring snowpack• Earlier peak runoff • Reduced annual flows (unless precip gains cancel out)• Reduced summer soil moisture• Greater plant moisture stress and crop water use
• These are all impacts currently associated with drought…they will occur more often in a warming climate
• Any future drought will be more severe, and will tend to persist longer, for a given precipitation deficit
Don’t fixate on trend: impacts will still be most deeply felt in low-precipitation (drought) years
Middle photo: Jane Stulp
Dust-on-snow also makes snow melt sooner, and probably reduces overall runoff
• Already has significant hydrologic impact; likely to get worse in future with warming/drying of source regions
• Impacts are in same direction as those caused by warming
Photos by Chris Landry, CSAS
Future drought: expectations from tree rings, instrumental record, and climate model projections
• Ancient trees tell us that the natural hydroclimatic variability is larger than the last 100 years would suggest (extreme short-term droughts & megadroughts)
• The instrumental record tells us precipitation drives drought, but temperature (ET) is also a big factor
• The climate models tell us that the temperature (ET) dial will continue to get turned up, but much more uncertain about precipitation
• Drought conditions will likely be more frequent and severe in the future
• Given the uncertainties in future climate, “scenario-based” planning is more appropriate than traditional “single-target” planning
• Please contact me ([email protected]) with questions or requests for information