Anatomy of a Patent Claims and Claim Charts Infringement Dr. Tal Lavian http://cs.berkeley.edu/~tlavian [email protected] UC Berkeley Engineering, CET 1
Dec 22, 2015
Anatomy of a PatentClaims and Claim Charts
Infringement
Dr. Tal Lavianhttp://cs.berkeley.edu/~tlavian
[email protected] Berkeley Engineering, CET
1
Anatomy of a Patent 2
TitleFiling dateField of SearchReferencesAbstractDrawingsDisclosure (aka Specification)
Background Brief Summary of Invention Brief Description of Drawings Detailed Description of Invention
Claims
INVENTORS
Classification Numbers
TITLE
PRIOR ART
ASSIGNEE
ABSTRACT
Issue date
Filing Date
3
Related history
Anatomy of a Patent – Title4
Title Short (<500 characters) Sometimes terse or misleading Usually the wording from an independent claim Example:
Slide-to-unlock patent’s title: “Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image”
Slide-to-unlock patent’s first independent claim: “A method of unlocking a hand-held device [by continuously moving an unlock image]”
Anatomy of a Patent – Filing Date
Filing date is critical for establishing priority date for prior art Generally, patent can be invalidated by prior art
existing up to one year before the priority date This was important since the U.S. used to be
under first-to-invent system Courts deciding infringement cases would look
to conception and reduction to practice (often filing) dates to determine who invented first
6
Anatomy of a Patent – Filing Date (cont.)
Filing date even more important now that U.S. has updated to first-to-file system Means under nearly all circumstances, first
person to file patent is considered proper inventor by the law No more consideration of conception or
reduction to practiceAll other countries have first-to-file system,
as well
7
Anatomy of a Patent – Field of Search
Field of Search Numerical classifications to which patent applies or is
cross-referenced These are the PTO numbering schemes, classes and
sub-classes Example: Slide-to-unlock patent classifications include:
715/863: Data processing: presentation processing of document, operator interface processing, and screen saver display processing; gesture-based
345/173: Computer graphics processing and selective visual display systems; touch panel
345/179: Computer graphics processing and selective visual display systems; stylus
Examiners use to locate prior art
8
Anatomy of a Patent – References and Abstract
8
References Other patents cited in the disclosure Optionally other material
Abstract Brief description of the technical disclosure of the
invention Permits the reader to quickly determine the nature
and gist of the invention. Not relied upon for PTO or legal analysis
However, sometimes used by judges to determine the claimed invention
For this reason, it is often a paraphrase of the first claim (obviates possibility of misinterpretation)
Anatomy of a Patent – Drawings9
Drawings illustrate the invention, at least one required
Typically show the “preferred embodiment” of each element of the invention
May include block diagrams, schematics, flow-charts
Anatomy of a Patent – Drawings (cont.)
Must be drawn according to strict PTO rules Line width, font size, etc. Can be done with Visio or similar drawing
programs Can submit preliminary drawing with initial
applicationand follow up later with final drawings(after first office action)
Good for defending patent claims and fulfilling the enablement requirement (a picture’s worth a thousand words)
10
Anatomy of a Patent – Disclosure: Background
11
Describes the field of invention Short description of the area invention applies to
Describes the prior art What has been done before and how the present
invention differs or improves upon that Prior art may be from other patents or any other
public source (old magazine articles, technical papers, text books, product literature, etc.)
Explains why the invention is useful Describes problem it solves or improvements it makes
Anatomy of a Patent – Disclosure: Brief Introduction
12
Brief summary of the invention Summarizes the specific invention being claimed
(however, must be complete enough not to limit scope of claims)
Brief description of drawings Describes what is shown in each drawing and
identifies the type of drawing (e.g., block diagram, cross section, etc.)
Anatomy of a Patent – Disclosure: Detailed Description
13
This is the main description of how the invention works Describes one or more “preferred embodiments” Also mentions other alternatives Defines terms used, which is important for claim
interpretation Must be detailed enough for one skilled in the art to
construct or use the invention (thus fulfilling the enablement requirement)
Usually relies on detailed references to figures
Anatomy of a Patent – Claims14
Most important part of the patent Precisely define the boundaries of the invention Meaning of words, phrases, and punctuation is critical
Court cases often turn on the interpretation of claims (often called “claim construction”) Drafting claims is a sophisticated art. Must be
Narrow enough to exclude all prior art Broad enough to be useful
Applies to many products or variations Hard to design around Able to survive challenges
Anatomy of a Patent – Claims: Two Basic Types
15
Independent claims Stand by themselves Comprise a set of limitations (or elements) that define the
scope of an invention Example: Claim 1 - An apparatus for moving objects
consisting of one or more round disks with axles connecting said round disks
Dependent claims Depend on an independent claim or another dependent
claim Add additional limitations (i.e., make more narrow and thus,
more patentable) Example: Claim 2 – Apparatus of Claim 1 wherein the
said axles are affixed to said round disks using aball bearing assembly
Claims
Specification
16
Anatomy of a Patent – Claims: Specific Types
17
Activity claims: Used for processes, methods, or uses
Example: claim for the method of distributing multimedia across mobile platforms
Referred to as method, process, or use claims
Physical entity claims Used for products (e.g., material) or apparatuses (e.g.,
device, system, or article) Example: claim for a device used to diagnose certain
types of pancreatic cancer Referred to as product or apparatus claims
Summary of Patent Anatomy18
Claims are the key description of inventionDisclosure describes preferred embodiment
(implementation) of invention, defines terminology
Filing date establishes date for considering prior art
Claim Chart
Element-by-element breakdown of a patent’s claims compared to an allegedly infringing product Often used by prosecution for infringement
analysisVery useful for visualizing which aspects of
the claims are read upon by potentially infringing devices
Example: Slide-to-Unlock vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab
19
US# 8046721— Slide to Unlock — Claim 1
Slide-to-unlock patent claim 1 Samsung Galaxy Tab
A method of unlocking a hand held electronic device device including a touch sensitive display the method comprising:
(Each of these rows would be filled with Galaxy Nexus features that read upon the claim elements in the opposite column)
detecting a contact with the touch sensitive display at a first predefined location corresponding to an unlock image;
e.g., The Galaxy Nexus has a touch screen that detects contact and which displays unlock images.
continuously moving the unlock image on the touch sensitive display in accordance with movement of the contact while continuous contact with the touch screen is maintained wherein the unlock image is a graphical interactive user interface object with which a user interacts in order to unlock the device; and
e.g., To unlock the Galaxy Nexus, the user must slide her finger across the touch screen, maintaining continuous contact while interacting with the unlock image.
unlocking the hand held electronic device if the moving the unlock image on the touch sensitive display results in movement of the unlock image from the first predefined location to a predefined unlock region on the touch sensitive display.
e.g., Once the user completes sliding the unlock image from the starting point to the ending point on the touch screen, the Galaxy Nexus is unlocked.(To prove infringement, need to show each and every element of a claim.)
Patent Infringement
Most of the time: Scenario:
Company A thinks Company’s B’s product infringes, sues B B has legal counsel perform due diligence, counsel says
“You’ll probably lose.” B agrees to settle with A and either
Stop producing the infringing product License A’s patent in order to continue infringing
Sometimes: Scenario:
Same as above, but B decides to go to court to defend their product
2
(Direct) Patent Infringement –Options
A sues B. B decides to take the case to trial. What are B’s options?
3
Patent Infringement –Defense: Patent Invalidity
Argue for patent invalidity: Perform prior art search to find prior art to
invalidate the patent claims Can show that A shouldn’t have gotten patent in the first
place Use claim construction to determine the breadth
of the claims Argue that claims are too broad, invalid
Demonstrate inequitable conduct on A’s behalf by providing evidence for clear intent to deceive the Patent Office
Show that A’s patent has expired
4
Patent Infringement –Defense: Non-infringing Use
Methods of demonstrating non-infringing use:
Perform an infringement analysis comparing A’s patent claims to B’s product features If not every element of one of A’s patent’s
claims found in B’s product, then not infringing
Prove that B already had a license for A’s patentPerhaps B already licensing A’s technology
from C, in which case no infringement
5
Patent Infringement –Uncommon Defenses
Prior user defense Applies only to business method patents If the defendant can prove use of the patented process
at least one year before its application was filed, not infringing Must be an “innocent infringer” i.e., did not know of the
patent
Laches Plaintiff is not allowed to assert patent rights if it can
be shown they delayed enforcement to increase potential damages from defendant
6
Patent Infringement – Basics
What does it mean to infringe a patent? Manufacture, import, sell, or offer to sell
patented technology Courts’ test for infringement has two steps:
Analyze the claims to construe their meaning (a.k.a. “claim construction”)
Attempt to apply the claims to the accused infringing product (a.k.a. seeing if the claims “read on” the product’s features)
7
Patent Infringement – Doctrine of Equivalents
Doctrine of Equivalents (DoE) – a product may still infringe a patent without directly infringing its claims if it performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to yield substantially the same result
8
Patent Infringement –Doctrine of Equivalents (cont.)
Purpose of DoE is to prevent potential infringers from making insignificant changes to a patented product in order to circumvent the claims
There are exceptions to DoE, which include Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents
Essentially, even if a product directly infringes on a patent’s claims, if it does so in a substantially different way to achieve a substantially different result, then it doesn’t infringe
Example: you invent a method of curing cancer using Edison’s light bulb would not infringe
This defense is very rare
9
Patent Infringement –Slide-to-Unlock Hypothetical
Assume Apple sued Samsung for infringing the slide-to-unlock patent with its Galaxy Tab.
First, the court would construe the claim language in a Markman hearing to determine the meaning of key terms
Second, the court would use a claim chart to analyze the degree to which the slide-to-unlock patent’s claim read on the Galaxy Tab’s unlock system
10
Slide-to-unlock patent claim 1 Samsung Galaxy Tab
A method of unlocking a hand held electronic device device including a touch sensitive display the method comprising:
(Each of these rows would be filled with Galaxy Tab features that read upon the claim elements in the opposite column)e.g., The Galaxy Tab has a touch screen that detects contact and which displays unlock images.
detecting a contact with the touch sensitive display at a first predefined location corresponding to an unlock image;
The Galaxy Tab has a touch screen that detects contact. Detects contact at the beginning of the unlock inage.
continuously moving the unlock image on the touch sensitive display in accordance with movement of the contact while continuous contact with the touch screen is maintained wherein the unlock image is a graphical interactive user interface object with which a user interacts in order to unlock the device; and
e.g., To unlock the Galaxy Tab, the user must slide her finger across the touch screen, maintaining continuous contact while interacting with the unlock image.
unlocking the hand held electronic device if the moving the unlock image on the touch sensitive display results in movement of the unlock image from the first predefined location to a predefined unlock region on the touch sensitive display.
e.g., Once the user completes sliding the unlock image from the starting point to the ending point on the touch screen, the Galaxy Tab is unlocked.
(To prove infringement, need to show each and every element of a claim.)
Patent Infringement –Slide-to-Unlock Hypothetical (cont.)
The claim chart must clearly indicate that the Galaxy Tab infringes Apple’s patent
What can Samsung do to defend itself?
12
Slide-to-Unlock Patent–Prior Art
Prior art listed as other patents under “References Cited”
However, other undiscovered or undisclosed prior art is often revealed in court Example: if Apple sued for slide-to-unlock
infringement in the U.S., defendant (ie, Samsung) might cite Neonode N1m (early smartphone released in 2005) as prior art in an attempt to invalidate patent
33
Slide-to-Unlock Patent – Prior Art (cont.)34
Slide-to-unlock function four minutes in
Patent Infringement –Hypothetical Samsung Defense
Samsung could: Try to invalidate the patent with prior art, such as
the Neonode N1m’s unlocking system Argue that the patent’s claims are too broad Look for evidence of inequitable conduct on
Apple’s behalf while filing for the slide-to-unlock patent
Argue that the Galaxy Tab doesn’t include every element of the claims
What do you think would be the result of this case?
13