Analytical Method Development and Validation Bob Seevers.

Analytical Method Development and Validation

Bob Seevers

Importance of Analytical Methods in Development Stability Studies

• Without analytical methods it is not possible to know what has happened during stability– Assay– Impurities/Degradation Products– Dissolution– Chiral Purity– Preservative Content

Interactive Role of Analytical Methods and Stability Data

• This is a chicken and egg problem– Need analytical methods to generate stability data– Need stability information to develop methods

• Start with preliminary method based on what is known of drug substance– Can determine content of drug substance– Known or expected degradants are separated

• Use preliminary method to analyze stress stability studies– Stress deliberately creates significant degradation– Can evaluate ability of method to separate degradants

• Use this information to modify/improve method

Types of Stress Studies

• Photostability• High Temperature• Low Temperature• Oxidation• pH extremes

Selection of Chromatographic Mode

• HPLC• Reversed-phase HPLC• Chiral HPLC• GC• TLC• Electorphoresis

Identifying Degradants

• Predicting routes of degradation– Acid/base hydrolysis of esters and amides– Oxidation of thiols, alcohols and amines– Loss of methyl groups

• Synthesizing possible degradants– Prepare possible degradant– Known Structure– Test it in potential analytical method

• Detectability• Separation from parent peak

Assay Run Time vs. Detection/Resolution

• Long run times for an assay mean that stability testing will take more time and cost more

• Shorter run times mean that testing will go faster and be less expensive but– Lower resolution– Some peaks may not be separated

Validation Protocol

• A validation protocol lays out ahead of time the experimental design that will be used to establish the validity the analytical methods– Reagent, solvents– Sample, standard, solution preparation– Identify equipment to be used– Chromatographic conditions– System suitability– Calculations

ICH Q2 Validation of Analytical Procedures

• Types of Analytical Procedures to be Validated – Identification tests; – Quantitative tests for impurities' content; – Limit tests for the control of impurities; – Quantitative tests of the active moiety in samples

of drug substance or drug product or other selected component(s) in the drug product.

• See also USP General Chapter <1225>, Validation of Compendial Methods

With Regard to Stability

• Types of Analytical Procedures to be Validated – Identification tests; – Quantitative tests for impurities' content; – Limit tests for the control of impurities; – Quantitative tests of the active moiety in samples

of drug substance or drug product or other selected component(s) in the drug product. • Drug product assay• This will also include quantifying dissolution results

Typical Validation Characteristics

• Accuracy• Precision– Repeatability– Intermediate Precision

• Specificity• Detection Limit • Quantitation Limit • Linearity• Range• Robustness

Accuracy

• Closeness of agreement between the value found and either – the value accepted as a conventional true value– or an accepted reference value

Accuracy for Drug Substance

• Several methods of determining accuracy are available: – application of an analytical procedure to an

analyte of known purity (e.g. reference material); – comparison of the results of the proposed

analytical procedure with those of a second well-characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined;

– accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have been established.

Accuracy for Drug Product

• Several methods for determining accuracy are available: – application of the analytical procedure to synthetic mixtures

of the drug product components to which known quantities of the drug substance to be analysed have been added;

– in cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of all drug product components , it may be acceptable either to add known quantities of the analyte to the drug product or to compare the results obtained from a second, well characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined;

– accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have been established.

Precision

• Precision of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement (degree of scatter) between a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogeneous sample under the prescribed conditions.– Repeatability– intermediate precision– reproducibility.

• The standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation) and confidence interval should be reported for each type of precision investigated.

Repeatability

• Repeatability should be assessed using: – a minimum of 9 determinations covering the

specified range for the procedure (e.g., 3 concentrations/3 replicates each);

– or – a minimum of 6 determinations at 100% of the

test concentration.

Intermediate Precision

• Depends on the circumstances under which the procedure is intended to be used.

• Look at effects of random events on the precision of the analytical procedure.– Days– Analysts– equipment, etc.

• It is not considered necessary to study these effects individually. The use of an experimental design (matrix) is encouraged.

Reproducibility

• Reproducibility is assessed by means of an inter-laboratory trial. Reproducibility should be considered in case of the standardization of an analytical procedure, for instance, for inclusion of procedures in pharmacopoeias. These data are not part of the marketing authorization dossier.

Specificity

• Specificity is the ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in the presence of components which may be expected to be present. Typically these might include impurities, degradants, matrix, etc.

• Lack of specificity of an individual analytical procedure may be compensated by other supporting analytical procedure(s).

Identity

• Able to discriminate between compounds of closely related structures which are likely to be present.

• The discrimination of a procedure may be confirmed by obtaining positive results (perhaps by comparison with a known reference material) from samples containing the analyte, coupled with negative results from samples which do not contain the analyte.

Detection Limit

• The detection limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value.

• Can be determined– Visually– Signal to Noise– Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope

Detection Limit: Signal to Noise

• This approach can only be applied to analytical procedures which exhibit baseline noise.

• Comparing measured signals from samples with known low concentrations of analyte with those of blank samples and establishing the minimum concentration at which the analyte can be reliably detected.

• A signal-to-noise ratio between 3 or 2:1 is generally considered acceptable for estimating the detection limit.

Detection Limit: Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope

• The detection limit (DL) may be expressed as: DL = 3.3 σ/S – σ = the standard deviation of the response– S = the slope of the calibration curve

• The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte. The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways, for example:– Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank – Based on the Calibration Curve

Quantitation Limit

• The quantitation limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. The quantitation limit is a parameter of quantitative assays for low levels of compounds in sample matrices, and is used particularly for the determination of impurities and/or degradation products.

Quantitation Limit

• Visual Evaluation • Signal-to-Noise• Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope

– quantitation limit (QL) may be expressed as: QL = 10 σ/S– σ = the standard deviation of the response

• S = the slope of the calibration curve• The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of

ways, for example:– Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank – Based on the Calibration Curve

Linearity

• The linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample.

• Test results should be evaluated by appropriate statistical methods, for example, by calculation of a regression line by the method of least squares. – correlation coefficient, y-intercept, slope of the regression

line and residual sum of squares should be submitted– minimum of 5 concentrations is recommended

Range• The range of an analytical procedure is the interval between the upper

and lower concentration (amounts) of analyte in the sample (including these concentrations) for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a suitable level of precision, accuracy and linearity.

• The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: – For the assay of a drug substance or a finished (drug) product:

normally from 80 to 120 percent of the test concentration; – For content uniformity, covering a minimum of 70 to 130 percent of

the test concentration, unless a wider more appropriate range, based on the nature of the dosage form (e.g., metered dose inhalers), is justified;

– For dissolution testing: +/-20 % over the specified range

Robustness

• The robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. – stability of analytical solutions; – extraction time. – influence of variations of pH in a mobile phase– influence of variations in mobile phase composition– different columns (different lots and/or suppliers)– Temperature– flow rate.

Method Validation Report

• Provide results of validation effort• Explain – Choice of acceptance criteria– How method was developed

• Method Validation Report will be submitted to regulators

Revalidation May be Necessary

• Changes in the synthesis of the drug substance;

• Changes in the composition of the finished product;

• Changes in the analytical procedure.