BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Analytical Comparison between (BOT) (BOOT) and other PPP Projects Presented By: Presented To: Bhavin Sharma Dr. Vishakha V Sakhare 2015H130059P (Assistant Professor)
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Analytical Comparison between (BOT) (BOOT) and other PPP Projects
Presented By: Presented To:
Bhavin Sharma Dr. Vishakha V Sakhare2015H130059P (Assistant Professor)
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Content
1. Why PPP??
2. Definition of PPPs in India
3. Objectives of a PPP?
4. Advantages of PPP
5. When should PPP be used?
6. Risk Involved
7. PPP Types 1. BOT
2. BOOT
3. FP
8. Analytical Comparison & Conclusion
9. References2
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Why PPP in infrastructure?
• Physical infrastructure– roads
– transportation systems
– water and sanitation networks
• They involve large investments that can put a strain on the public purse. This strainis especially great for countries, such as India, whose economies are undergoingrapid development and urbanisation and have a great need for expandedinfrastructure.
• Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly being used by governments andpublic sector authorities throughout the world as a way of increasing access toinfrastructure services for their citizenry and economies at a reduced cost.
3
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Definition of PPPs in India
4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
According to “The Department of Economic Affairs (DEA), Ministry of Finance (GOI)
An arrangement between a government or statutory entity or governmentowned entity on one side and a private sector entity on the other, for theprovision of public assets and/ or related services for public benefit, throughinvestments being made by and/or management undertaken by the privatesector entity for a specified time period, where there is a substantial risksharing with the private sector and the private sector receives performancelinked payments that conform (or are benchmarked) to specified, pre-determined and measurable performance standards.
5
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Objectives of a PPP in infrastructure
Increase the availability of infrastructure services
To do so with greater efficiency (lower cost for the level of services provided) than could be achieved using the traditional public sector approach
6
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Advantages of PPP
• Access to private sector finance
• Efficiency advantages from using private sector skills and from transferring risk to the private sector
• Potentially increased transparency
• Enlargement of focus from only creating an asset to delivery of a service, including maintenance of the infrastructure asset during its operating lifetime
• This broadened focus creates incentives to reduce the full life-cycle costs (i.e., construction costs and operating costs)
All of these provide strong reasons in favour of using PPPs in India and elsewhere.
7
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Investments through PPP Models
The following chart shows the increasing trend of investments in infrastructure through PPPs,
during the period 1990 to 2008. 8
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
When should PPP be used?
• The public sector environment is suited to supporting PPPs
• The project is suitable to being carried out as a PPP
• The potential barriers to successful project implementation havebeen identified and can be overcome
• Given that these conditions are satisfied, the project must becommercially viable for the private sector and offer value formoney (VFM) for the public sector
9
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Risk - a critical focus of PPP design
• "Risk is the chance of an event occurring which would cause actual project circumstances to differ from those assumed when forecasting project benefits and costs”
(Risk Management & Contractual Issues, Partnerships Victoria)
• The parties involved in a project can affect the amount of risk by:
– The level of influence they have over events
– The level of information they have about the present and the future
10
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
For e.g. (influence they have over events)
• The Public Sector
It has certain powers and advantages in the process of land acquisition thatmean it is sometimes better suited to this task and taking the associated risks.
• By Private Sector
The private sector is exposed to competitive pressures that force it toestablish improved management practices. It is also often the technologyleader. This means it may be better suited to managing the design andconstruction risks.
11
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
PPP Options/ Types
12
Full privatization, the private sector assumesownership of the infrastructure (design, build,operation and maintenance and finance)
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Responsibility of Sectors
13
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Build Operate Transfer (BOT)
• In this approach a private party or concessionaire retains a concession for afixed period from a public party, called principal (client), for thedevelopment and operation of a public facility
• The development consists of the financing, design and construction of thefacility, managing and maintaining the facility adequately, and making itsufficiently profitable
• The concessionaire secures return of investment by operating the facilityand, during the concession period, the concessionaire acts as owner. At theend of the concession period, the concessionaire transfers the ownership ofthe facility to the principal at no cost
14
The most common examples are roads, bridges, water and sewer systems,
airports, ports and public buildings
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Stages of BOT Project
Construction
(Built) [B]
Operation
[O]
Transfer
[T]
15
Preliminary Study
Selection Process
Project Implementation
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages Dis-advantages
Utilization of private sector's investment instead of public sector's
Very complicated from the viewpoint of technical and financial issues and need high level experts and consultants
Transferring all the risk to private sector
Increasing expenditures of users in operation time
Transferring technical knowledge is one of the most important benefits of this method for developing countries
Contrast between benefits of private sector with public sector
16
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT)
• It is a founding model and a form of concession in which a public authoritymakes an agreement with a private company (concessionaire) to Design Build,Own and Operate a specific piece of an infrastructure
• such as power, transport, water, and telecom industries, within receiving theright to achieve income from the facility under a period of time
• (concession period approximately 15-25 years), and later transferring it backinto public ownership through a single organization or consortium (BOOTprovider)
• The earned income can be based on a variety of arrangements, ranging from afixed annual fee (flat rate) to the measured quantity supplied (unit rate) and"Take-or-pay" arrangements are effectively two part tariffs expressed in adifferent manner.
17
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Advantages and Disadvantages
18
Advantages Dis-advantages
Strong financial incentives for the BOOT operator
Higher cost for the end user due to the BOOT provider accountability of 100 percent financing and on-going maintenance
Risk mitigation through the involvement of multiple participants
Time consuming and resource hungry management and monitoring of the operating contract with the BOOT operators
Increase the project certainty and early interest recovering through involving a BOOT operator
Requirement of a rigorous selection process in selecting a BOOT partner
Efficient designs, High accountability
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Full Privatization
• It is a service contract between a public authority and a private sectorconcessionaire, where the public authority pays the concessionaire to deliverinfrastructure and related services
• Typically, the concessionaire, who builds the infrastructure asset, is financiallyresponsible for its condition and performance throughout the asset lifetime,or the duration of the agreement
19
Full privatization, the private sector assumes ownershipof the infrastructure (design, build, operation andmaintenance and finance)
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages Dis-advantages
Engages in a competitive process to achieve the best project for the best cost
Government risk
Establishes performance standards and payment mechanisms
Non-complete contracts and uncertainty over a long horizon are other FP challenges
Faster procurement
20
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Analytical Comparison
• BOOT versus BOT
– The definition of BOOT and BOT is very close together and the onlydifference is the ownership of facilities in BOOT and because of this, qualityof the work is vital to private
– BOOT is more efficient
– The BOOT contracts have the tendency to work well when the purpose ofthe project is to offer a service, but if the aim is to improve a service ormake more efficient a system, this modality is not recommended. Thesemethodologies increment the complexity of the financial study
21
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
• FP versus BOT & BOOT
⁻ In FP, private sector has a role as engineer or constructor, Ownership, operation and financing
⁻ On the other hand a pure private is responsible for all matter.
⁻ In BOOT final owner is public, but concession for a long period of time (25-30 year) is regarded to private
⁻ The ownership shifts from public to private as we move from FP to BOOT
⁻ Also private sector accepts more risk and preparing capital investment in BOOT/BOT
22
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
• Clear law and regulation and Stable political and economical environment is an important factor that effect BOOT/BOT project more than FP
• The degree of involvement in BOOT/BOT is restricted
• Advantage of this, is releasing from project jobs
• Disadvantage is low control of government on project
• Britain vs. turkey is a good example
– Crises in political relation of two countries caused the
– British party leave project dam building in turkey because Turkish government was not involved with project document, they were unable to continue the project
23
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Conclusions
Comparison AspectMethod Risk Public
supportDuration period
Involvement Investment Cost for end user
Efficiency
BOT 90% by private sector
Vital Long term (20-30)
Less public 70-100% by privatesector
Higher Medium-high
BOOT 90% by private sector
Vital Long term (30+)
Less public 70-100% by private sector
Higher High
FP 90% by public sector
Not important
Short term Nil Lower by public sector
Lower -Higher
High- Low
24
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
References
• World Bank Group[US] https://ppiaf.org/
• http://finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/dea.asp
• Thomas, S. M, measuring the impacts of delivery system on project performance, Construction Industry Institute, 2003
• Prof. Drs. Ir. Sebastiaan C.M. Menheere, P. S, Case Studies On Build Operate Transfer. Delft, The Netherlands, Delft University of Technology, 1996
• Verhoeven, L., BOT in Netherlands, university of technology, Delft, Netherlands, 1997
• Menheere, C. P., Case studies on Build, Operation, and Transfer, 1996
• Canada, P. (2010, may-June). P3 Canada Fund. Retrieved May 30, 2010, from public-private partnerships Canada: http://www.p3canada.ca/_files/file/P3C_Project_Submission_Guide_Round_Two_EN.pdf
• http://toolkit.pppinindia.com/highways/sitemap-gts%20.php?links=intro1
25
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus